View source for Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]] [[Category:Wikipedia edit warring]]
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} 
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 444
|algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid=" ns="4" title="Wikipedia:Administrators&#039; noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>khi
  
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->

== [[User:DinosaursKing]] reported by [[User:Toddy1]] (Result: Page protected) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Largest prehistoric animals}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|DinosaursKing}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1050004667&oldid=1048084491 06:01, 15 October 2021] changed "Otodus megalodon" to "C. megalodon"

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1055501471&oldid=1054573621 06:46, 16 November 2021] changed "O. megalodon" to "C. megalodon" and added 20.3 metre 103 tonne claim
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1056968376&oldid=1056963586 16:42, 24 November 2021] changed "O. megalodon" to "C. megalodon" and added 20.3 metre 103 tonne claim
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1057512337&oldid=1057378493 02:17, 28 November 2021] revert to preferred version of the Mackerel sharks (Lamniformes) section
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1057922853&oldid=1057906753 12:50, 30 November 2021] revert to preferred version of the Mackerel sharks (Lamniformes) section
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1058074243&oldid=1058010308 08:32, 1 December 2021] revert to preferred version of the Mackerel sharks (Lamniformes) section
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1058097610&oldid=1058084912 12:47, 1 December 2021] revert to preferred version of the Mackerel sharks (Lamniformes) section
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1058162665&oldid=1058126247 21:14, 1 December 2021] partial revert to preferred version of the Mackerel sharks (Lamniformes) section.  The difference between [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1058162665&oldid=1058097610 this version and his/her previous version] shows that he/she has accepted that it is ''Otodus megalodon''.  

'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADinosaursKing&type=revision&diff=1058075535&oldid=1058074908]

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''<br>
*[[Talk:Largest prehistoric animals#Mackerel sharks (Lamniformes)]]
*[[User talk:DinosaursKing#Megalodon]]
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIshan87&type=revision&diff=1058083735&oldid=1057926236 User talk:Ishan87]

'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADinosaursKing&type=revision&diff=1058102988&oldid=1058077865]

<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 13:35, 1 December 2021‎ (UTC)<br>
amended<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 21:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

I understand that the subject in question is [[User:DinosaurKing]]. However, [[User:Ishan87]] is still not off the hook. While reading through his userpage, i found evidence of multiple 1st, 2nd, and 3rd warnings. Also, i found that many copyvio files that had been uploaded by his account are falsely claimed to be his own. However, the first user to break the three revert rule was [[User:DinosaurKing]]. Still, [[User:Ishan87]] had been making continous possibly unconstructive edits. Just wanted to add some helpful information. Please notify me if i have seen wrongly. --[[User:InternetScavenger89|<span style="color:#ff809">'''Internet'''</span><span style="color:#b9898">'''Scavenger'''</span>]][[User talk:InternetScavenger89|<span style="color:#ff9a00">'''89'''</span>]] 17:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
:I agree that Ishan87 is a problem here; DinosaurKing's version is the status quo at least. Both are edit warring however. {{AN3|p}} [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 21:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
How was any of my edits on that page unproductive may I ask? I updated scientific names as well as size estimations of quite a few animals matching according to the pages of those animals. The links I used are also there, you guys can check them up. Still why are you accusing me of warring? All that DinosaursKing guy did was change things (a section in particular) back to whatever he likes, which's not acceptable to Wikipedia standards. He has no contribution in Wikipedia other than subbornly sticking up to that 1 page and undoing whatever he doesn't like. Still you're blaming me? Please be real.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ishan87|Ishan87]] ([[User talk:Ishan87#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ishan87|contribs]]) 14:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC)</span>
:There has been continued discussion on the article's talk page, but no consensus that I can see, and now that the protection has ended the edit war is continuing, with 3 more reverts by [[user:Ishan87]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&diff=1058772571&oldid=1058510156] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&diff=1058778937&oldid=1058774378] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&diff=1059011420&oldid=1058785459] and four more by [[user:DinosaursKing]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&diff=1058774378&oldid=1058772571] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&diff=1058785459&oldid=1058778937] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&type=revision&diff=1059027543&oldid=1059011420] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Largest_prehistoric_animals&diff=1059068278&oldid=1059055140]. There's also one revert since the protection ended by [[User:Toddy1]], who is participating in the talk page discussion and is not edit warring. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 07:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
:I blocked DK for 72 hours before seeing this. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 07:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:67.71.190.59]] reported by [[User:SinkingInMercury]] (Result: Semi) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Harley Quinn}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|67.71.190.59}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058683263&oldid=1058667538&diffmode=source]

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058206086&oldid=1058196772&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058259723&oldid=1058228242&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058323774&oldid=1058269558&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058491862&oldid=1058363441&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058603288&oldid=1058595761&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058667538&oldid=1058603539&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1058761304&oldid=1058761065&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Quinn&diff=1059019209&oldid=1058764395&diffmode=source]

'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:67.71.190.59&diff=1058603703&oldid=1050290819&diffmode=source]

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:67.71.190.59&diff=1058699765&oldid=1058603703&diffmode=source]

'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:67.71.190.59&diff=1059025166&oldid=1058750590&diffmode=source]

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
*'''Result:''' Semiprotected one year. In the past the article has sometimes been protected for a long time. This particular IP editor reverts constantly and has no experience in using talk pages. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 02:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:Masem]] reported by [[User:SquidHomme]] (Result: No violation) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Squid Game}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Masem}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Squid_Game&diff=1059055939&oldid=1059055777]

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Squid_Game&diff=1058058358&oldid=1058057697]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Squid_Game&diff=1059055256&oldid=1059054720]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Squid_Game&diff=1059055939&oldid=1059055777]

'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Masem&diff=1059057620&oldid=1059055195]

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Masem&diff=1058059448&oldid=1057767945]

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
* The information that SquidHomme has been trying to add (related to a story that a student in North Korea had been executed for importing copies of ''Squid Game'' into the country) had been discussed earlier on the talk page and it was determined that there was enough doubt raised by reliable sources to not include. (See [[Talk:Squid Game#Death penalty in North Korea for owning squid games]]. My first revert allude to this disproven story. SquidHomme asked on my talk page about what sources were there to disprove it and I provided the talk page link: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Masem&diff=1058059573&oldid=1058059477]. Apparently they could not see that despite the clear links on the talk page, and claimed that if I couldn't provide sources that disproved it, they would readd the material -- which itself is a precursor to their own edit warring. I had reiterated the talk page section in today's discussion on my talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Masem&diff=1059055195&oldid=1059055124] and also repeated the talk page section link in one of the reverts. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Squid_Game&diff=1059055939&oldid=1059055777] There's a bit of [[WP:CIR]] aspects here as they do not seem to be able to read the clear talk page section (linked to them) where the discussion and source links discrediting the story have been provided and other editors have established the information should not be included. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 05:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
*{{AN3|nv}} [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 05:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:Scope creep]] reported by [[User:NemesisAT]] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Interlake Maritime Services}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Scope creep}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059070711&oldid=1058939772&diffmode=source]

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059070711&oldid=1058939772]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059096486&oldid=1059094240&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059125785&oldid=1059125505]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059136102&oldid=1059135174&diffmode=source]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059111548&oldid=1059097959]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059132336&oldid=1059129863&diffmode=source]

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interlake_Maritime_Services&diff=1059127630&oldid=1059126493]

'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scope_creep&diff=1059137799&oldid=1058987094]

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
I've also had some talk page warnings from Scope creep. We had a disagreement the previous day in which they accused me of edit warring, however I don't believe this to be the case. They have also reverted my edits without any explanation ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Victory_Brinker&diff=1058941877&oldid=1058939821 example]).

===Deproding and reverting redirects===
::I didn't accuse you of edit warring at any time while I have been in here, until you edit warred.  These are the reason why we are here: Yesterday, two articles were deprodded for no reason that I can see and an article was reverted after being reviewed by two new page reviewers in good standing. The subject started to edit war to restore the article and I reverted at back to the redirect. I reviewed the articles and the references looked atrocious. This is the article: {{pagelinks|Victory Brinker}}. The subject has no existance outwith the show, there was no secondary sources, but somehow had be reverted back to the article, which was never explained, really. The prod's he took off were {{pagelinks|Wondernet}} and {{pagelinks|SuperSonic (ISP)}}. There was seven of these ISP articles originally  created and four of them were deleted by A7, created by by mix of UPE/Paid/WP editors. {{pagelinks|Wondernet}} has been sent to Afd and will be deleted as will the other one, as they're generic, but they had to go to Afd as well. They're was no work by the editor to determine, why they were prodded in the first place, no work to determine anything really, it had to go to Afd. No attempt to build consensus. No mention of the guidelines.

===Conversation yesterday===
::I had a conversation with {{userlinks|NemesisAT}} yesterday, trying to find out why they deprodded the articles without any reason. The [[User talk:Scope creep#Victory Brinker|conversation]] didn't go anywhere really, even though I attempted to determine why, but there was no reason behind it. In the conversation, the editor states ''I wrote in the history "add ref, decline PROD. Has had more than one appearance on different programs, so I feel she may be notable". I'm sorry, I don't need to provide any more reasoning than that.'' No attempt to build consensus. 
::The reference I reviewed on {{pagelinks|Victory Brinker}} was about the show. They're is no secondary links on this [[WP:BLP]].  The article was reverted back to redirect. The editor seemed to think that prod was somehow outside consensus. I reviewed on NPP was [{{pagelinks|Interlake Maritime Services}}, twice. It is now at Afd at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interlake Maritime Services]]. The article is a brochure article, it was at prodd, but it was deprodded by editor {{userlinks|Kablammo}}, even though the four references were routine coverage. It was sent to Afd. {{userlinks|NemesisAT}} who voted to keep in the discussion: 

::::''Regardless of the level of sourcing on Interlake Maritime Services specifically, the company has been active for a while as Interlake Steamship Company[4] and appears to have recently restructured after taking over the operation of the Lake Michigan Carferry Service.''. 

::That was their rationale and that is when I had an epiphany. This whole insn't about deprod, although that is part of it. The whole is [[WP:ARS]] at work. Here is another editor complaining about {{userlinks|NemesisAT}} on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big John (dinosaur)]] stating they are [[WP:ARS]] and that is when it clicked. The editor is stating of the Afd:

::''The Article Rescue Squadron is essentially organised canvassing for inclusionists, which explains the sloppy reasoning of the keep votes so far.'' On here,  {{userlinks|NemesisAT}} who is part of the group. Here something insightful, that I noticed today. On {{userlinks|NemesisAT}}, he is getting a Dobos Torte from 7&6=thirteen. Which brings it today.


===Yesterday===
::Yesterday, {{pagelinks|Interlake Maritime Services}} was sent to Afd. I participated due to doing the review, it came on the watchlist. After I did review of the three routine annoucement references and 1 primary ref to the company, {{userlinks|NemesisAT}} decided to vote take part, stating: 

::''Regardless of the level of sourcing on Interlake Maritime Services specifically, the company has been active for a while as Interlake Steamship Company[4] and appears to have recently restructured after taking over the operation of the Lake Michigan Carferry Service.''

::which to me, looked like a UPE. I asked him about, he no, I said fine. Later, he started updating the article. One part of the update was adding a sentence to the end of the {{pagelinks|Interlake Maritime Services}} Subsidiaries section, for article that had previously been deleted. References were put on them:

::* Interlake Logistics Services - this division formerly operated a chartered cargo ship Montville[5]
::* Interlake Port Services

::None of that exists on Wikipedia. There is no context here. I took it off, they put it back on. I issued disruptive warning x 2. He went to the talk page, stating ''Please can you explain your motivation? '', we talked. I stated:
:: ''There is no context for those links'' He stated:
:: ''Sorry, I don't follow this reasoning at all''. 

There is no links, no information of Wikipedia on it at all. No attempt to build consensus. No mention of the guidelines, in the past three days. No mention of [[WP:V]], [[WP:NCORP]] or [[WP:SIGCOV]]. Nothing, no mention of any guidelines. It was just another ARS attempt to save the article from AFD.  It went back and forward several times and here we are. I am really tired of this bunch. I have identified about 13 of them. They work with their own ideology and no interest in building consensus, discussing guidelines or making the thing fair.  I intend to make a complaint to the WMF about them after Christmas. I came across this Afd today, and I took part in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vesey Alfred Davoren]]. Look at the pile on at the end. NOTE: It is not all the ARS there though. It is important to state that. After the relist.  '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 20:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

:The first time I heard about them was from another editor complaining about them. Since then, I've been alerted to a few AfD discussions through the project page which I followed. That is the limit of my involvement with ARS, though I'm not sure how that is relevant here. 7&6=thirteen left a message at mine and Jamesallain85's talk page after we both voted in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vesey Alfred Davoren]].
:Regarding [[Victory Brinker]], your first edit summary claimed the PROD hadn't been contested. It had, by myself, so I reverted what appeared to be an edit made in error. You reverted me without reason. I don't believe I was edit warring here, and I object to having my edits reverted without even an attempt at an explanation. Per [[WP:BLAR]], if the redirect was restored, the next step should be discussion or AfD. 
:Scope creep nominated [[Interlake Maritime Services]] for deletion apparently in retaliation to me deprodding two articles (see our discussion on their talk page). Scope creep removed these bullet points (which I didn't add, btw) four times with [[Talk:Interlake Maritime Services|differing reasons each time]] and sent me two warning templates again with different reasoning each time. Scope creep's summary above is incomplete. They actually wrote {{tq|There is no context for those links, not in a see also section. See also sections entries, usually point to something internally to Wikipedia.}} to which I replied {{tq|Sorry, I don't follow this reasoning at all. The links weren't in a "See also" section, the section is titled "Subsidiaries"}}. Scope creep then accused me of {{tq|adding a reference with no context merely to win an Afd and keep that article. That was the reason it was added.}}
:I think that's enough for now. [[User:NemesisAT|NemesisAT]] ([[User talk:NemesisAT|talk]]) 20:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
:*I hope that [[User:Scope creep]] will respond and explain why they should not be blocked for violating the  3RR at [[Interlake Maritime Services]]. All this stuff about [[WP:ARS]] is interesting but not germane to the edit warring charge. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
::True, but there is always an underlying cause and that is it. It was a clear violation of edit warring as its defined. We were both edit warring that day, not because I normally do that because the process was followed. The editor was edit warring on the [[Victory Brinker]] article for the same reason. I removed the links with different reasons edit summaries because he wasn't willing believe me, to trust me what I was saying. I don't think the editor was interested in the reason. I've worked with 100's of editor's on articles hoping to meet [[WP:HEY]] and if the article was updated to a decent quality, I would have given them help. I've helped in articles that I considered absolutly rank, no use to wikipedia, man nor beast and still, but I've still helped folk when they made a really good argument for it. Here there was no logic to it.  Regarding the prod, usually there was a decent argument left in edit summary. When you see that and it makes sense, it is natural just to move on and forget about it. There was nothing there, apart from a message about references. Regarding the [[Victory Brinker]] that was reviewed by myself and another editor. It was badly referenced. He wanted it to taken to Afd, without suppyling any kind of rational reason, for it. It is within process to redirect badly written and very poor quality articled, so I restored as it was on my watchlist. I sent the Interlake article to Afd as it is the process. Not because of retaliation. I sent the other deprodded for the exact same reason. I have done with 100's of articles  It is an advert article with no place on wikipedia. The editors additions of those list entities would have made it more brochure article. The reference on the text could have went anywhere on the article, it didn't need there. All in all, it has been a crap experience.  '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 15:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
:::[[WP:PROD]] suggests AfD as an alternative if a PROD is contested. [[WP:BLAR]] suggests the next step after a redirect is objected to is AfD. I don't have strong feelings about that article itself and I also understand that [[WP:BLAR]] is a valid alternative to deletion. I don't particularly like articles being redirected without discussion as it can easily be done without other potentially interested editors noticing and in this case I felt my objection to the PROD should be enough to suggest I didn't want the article turned into a redirect either. Hence why I restored it, per [[WP:BLAR]]. What I really object to is editors using their NPP privileges as an excuse to revert me without any explanation whatsoever, as you did.
:::{{tq|I removed the links with different reasons edit summaries because he wasn't willing believe me, to trust me what I was saying.}} This sounds like edit warring to me. How can I trust you when your reasoning varies each time, and you send me warning templates for daring to disagree? [[User:NemesisAT|NemesisAT]] ([[User talk:NemesisAT|talk]]) 16:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:Ekdalian]] reported by [[User:Suthasianhistorian8]] (Result: Block, warning) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Singh}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Ekdalian}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1059138384&oldid=1059138252]

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1059138384&oldid=1059138252]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1059137279&oldid=1059136421]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1059061109&oldid=1059028681]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1058970430&oldid=1058955893]
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1058970430&oldid=1058955893]

'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [link]

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suthasianhistorian8&oldid=1059071591#December_2021]
 (note on my user talk page)
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ekdalian#Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion]

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />


User keeps making frivolous threats and accusations. First he made numerous edits removing the sentence that Singh was a common Rajput suffix/surname by the 16th century, he obviously didn't bother to read any sources before edit warring and this was proven on my talk page. After making 3-4 edits removing that for no reason, he then added it back after realizing he was wrong and removing sourced claims. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1059070061&oldid=1059062990]. He now keeps reverting edits to fix his oddly placed and worded statements that are already repeated in the article within the same paragraph. He is absolutely insistent on unnecessarily repeating himself in the article and making redundant edits. He clearly has a poor grasp of the English language as seen here, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1059138252&oldid=1059137922] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&diff=1059070061&oldid=1059062990], and is insisting on edit warring to repeat a claim in the leading sentence that is already mentioned in the ending sentence of the article === "it eventually became a common surname adopted by different communities." while in the very same paragraph it goes on to say "As a surname or a middle name, it is now found throughout the world across communities and religious groups, becoming more of a title than a surname". On top of that, he frequently vandalizes various caste articles and keeps making baseless threats. [[User:Suthasianhistorian8|Suthasianhistorian8]] ([[User talk:Suthasianhistorian8|talk]]) 18:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
*I've blocked Suthasianhistorian8 for two weeks. The bases may be found in the block log and at the user's Talk page. I'm not closing this report, though, because {{U|Ekdalian}} also edit-warred at the article. I'll leave that aspect of this report to another administrator.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 18:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
:*'''Result:''' [[User:Suthasianhistorian8]] has been blocked two weeks by Bbb23. I'm '''warning''' [[User:Ekdalian]] that his own reverts don't qualify for exemption under [[WP:NOT3RR]], even if the other party sems to be violating common sense. In such cases it's better to report the other party to admins right away and avoid breaking 3RR yourself. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:37.172.150.148]] reported by [[User:Tommi1986]] (Result: Pblocks) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Christian Rosa}}

'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|37.172.150.148}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' 

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1059191309|00:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059190565|00:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059189660|00:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059188290|23:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059154114|19:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059152978|19:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff|oldid=1059150439|diff=1059151512|label=Consecutive edits made from 19:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC) to 19:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|1059151192|19:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|1059151305|19:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|1059151512|19:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059149696|19:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059148945|19:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""

'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
#{{diff2|1059190655|00:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}}
#{{diff2|1059190962|00:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}}

'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
The IP editor is attempting to edit war in a 1978 birth date or equivalent ("aged 43"), when some other source give the date as 1982. I apologise for edit warring with the IP here, I thought I was justified on BLP grounds. [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Result:''' Another admin has taken care of this by applying partial blocks to two IPs. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:162.222.25.236]] reported by [[User:Kaseng55]] (Result: Blocked) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Austin S. Miller}}

'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|162.222.25.236}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' 

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1059219470|04:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1059219285|04:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Information"
# {{diff2|1059219109|04:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Information"
# {{diff2|1059218579|04:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} ""

'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
#  {{diff2|1059219218|04:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on [[:Austin S. Miller]]."
#  {{diff2|1059219402|04:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:Austin S. Miller]]."

'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

Continues to add his own personal view by alerting readers that there are some scammers impersonating the subject. I warned him, but he never listened. [[User:Kaseng55|Kaseng55]] ([[User talk:Kaseng55|talk]]) 04:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)	
* {{AN3|b|31 hours}} '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 04:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

{{reply to|Acroterion}} I found another user. Look like a ban evasion or a meatpuppet. The IP address is [[Special:Contributions/2600:1004:B156:140:8560:5DD9:7E6F:3E70|2600:1004:B156:140:8560:5DD9:7E6F:3E70]]. [[User:Kaseng55|Kaseng55]] ([[User talk:Kaseng55|talk]]) 04:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
:[[User:Acroterion]] has now taken care of the second IP. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 14:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:Paki.tv]] reported by [[User:Mujinga]] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|London Action Resource Centre}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Paki.tv}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1057759957]

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1059166570]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1059261407]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1059277010]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1059279384]

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' 
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1059278930] 
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1059276449]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:London_Action_Resource_Centre&oldid=1059178642]

'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paki.tv&oldid=1059281021]

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

It's a long running dispute as shown on the talkpage. The latest section for that is [[Talk:London_Action_Resource_Centre#Continued_adding_of_disputed_text]] which includes my recent attempts to engage, with no response in the last 24 hours [[User:Mujinga|Mujinga]] ([[User talk:Mujinga|talk]]) 15:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:Serols]] reported by [[User:ToBeFree]] (Result: Semi) ==

*'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates}}
*'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Serols}}

I need a second opinion about [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates&action=history&offset=20211208230000 the current page history of "LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates"] in the context of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive442#User%3ASerols_reported_by_User%3AToBeFree_%28Result%3A_Resolved%29 an earlier report]. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 20:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

:The thing is, it's not even unsourced. If Serols was at least correct about removing unsourced material, but no, the source says "for attempting to resemble women", and the reverted contributor tried to add "because they were cross-dressing". Serols reverts them for adding "unsourced content" and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&diff=1059306767&oldid=1059306603&diffmode=source requests page protection] for "persistent vandalism". I'm really out of hope here. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 21:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

::The [https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/09/07/uae-stop-policing-gender-expression source] says: {{tq|The two Singaporeans, Muhammed Fadli Abdul Rahman and Nur Qistina Fitriah Ibrahim, told Human Rights Watch they were wearing jeans, sneakers, and long-sleeved button-down shirts at the time of their arrest. Fadli, a cisgender male fashion photographer, said he wore a chain around his neck and has an ear piercing and a nose piercing, while Ibrahim, a transgender woman who works as a model, had long hair. Police told them their arrest was on the grounds of "looking feminine."}} But it's not just that edit that's being disputed, it's also the one about "In September 2016, the Government passed ''Federal Decree No 4''"...? [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 21:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
:::When someone uses the edit summary [[Special:Diff/1059307107|"not providing a reliable source"]] (sorry, I accidentally misquoted that from mind above), I expect it to primarily refer to addition, not removal, of material. Anyway: [[WP:3RR]], [[WP:ROLLBACKUSE]]. Three unexplained reverts of good-faith contributions, one additional incorrectly explained revert, a protection request for "persistent vandalism". Add five incorrect warnings for things that didn't happen. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:188.70.52.70&oldid=1059306124 One], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:188.70.52.70&diff=1059306332&oldid=1059306124&diffmode=source two], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2A00:1851:8000:42C5:D9C0:3B3D:E6D:4DFD&oldid=1059306650 three], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2A00:1851:8000:42C5:D9C0:3B3D:E6D:4DFD&diff=1059306660&oldid=1059306650&diffmode=source four], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2A00:1851:8000:42C5:D9C0:3B3D:E6D:4DFD&diff=1059307109&oldid=1059306660&diffmode=source five]. [[File:Emoji_u1f610.svg|20px|alt=😐]] [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 21:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

At 18:21, 8 December 2021‎ [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates&type=revision&diff=1059307107&oldid=1059306980 Serols reverted the addition of "because they were cross-dressing", and gave as a reason: ''not providing a reliable source (WP:CITE, WP:RS)''].  The [https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/09/07/uae-stop-policing-gender-expression cited source] did not mention the words "cross-dressing".  Serols did the same thing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates&type=revision&diff=1059306657&oldid=1059306508 at 18:17, 8 December 2021] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates&type=revision&diff=1059306329&oldid=1059306289 18:15, 8 December 2021], but with no edit summary.  In each case Serols placed warning templates on the talk page of the editors reverted. In two out of three cases the warnings mentioned that the problem was that the edits reverted were not supported by reliable sources, which was both correct and helpful. Though Serols was probably right to make those reverts, he/she was not reverting clear cut vandalism so the three reverts count towards the three-revert rule.

The reverts at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates&type=revision&diff=1059306121&oldid=1059306099 18:13] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates&type=revision&diff=1059306166&oldid=1059306121 18:14] count as one revert because there were no edits by other users between them.‎ Serols was reverting vandalism, and the warning messages Serols left on the editor's talk pages were appropriate.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 23:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
:I would wholly support this analysis. Editing, particularly by anon IPs, who are based in the region, can often get a bit fraught. I have encountered a series of crusading [[WP:SPA]]s, on this and similar articles, over the years. Not always easy to "police." [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 15:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
::Hello [[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] and [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]], thank you for your comments. The fact is, that I have read this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates&diff=1059308055&oldid=1059307107 editing] and accepted it. For me, this edit was the only one, that complied with the rules. Regards --[[User:Serols|Serols]] ([[User talk:Serols|talk]]) 16:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

There has been a short additional discussion at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serols&oldid=1059483660#Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion_2 Serols's talk page], and it does resolve my concerns. Thanks to everyone! [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 19:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Result:''' The page at [[LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates]] has been semiprotected for one year by [[User:ToBeFree]] under [[WP:ARBGS]], which looks to be a reasonable step. I've discussed with ToBeFree and Serols on their talk pages whether any further action is needed, though I have none to propose at this time. Serols is getting close to the point where loss of his rollback flag should be considered. If you believe something is unsourced and your response is to get into an edit war, that's not advisable. In this particular case the material really *was* sourced and some discussion might have helped realize that. Neither the IP nor Serols used the talk page, which is the place where this could have been worked out. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:49.178.80.27]] reported by [[User:Laterthanyouthink]] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Photograph}}

'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|49.178.80.27}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' 

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1059401914|06:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "But it is. It is an example."
# {{diff2|1059230506|06:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1059218244 by [[Special:Contributions/MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) What photo would you like then?"
# {{diff2|1059217128|04:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1059202807 by [[Special:Contributions/MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) This is an example.  Mugshot"
# {{diff2|1059202037|01:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1059098841 by [[Special:Contributions/MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) Unexplained."

'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

Pattern of unconstructive editing and argumentative - pretty sure it's the same person who got blocked the other day under another IP. [[User:Laterthanyouthink|Laterthanyouthink]] ([[User talk:Laterthanyouthink|talk]]) 06:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

:Also tendentious edit warring at {{la|Patty Hearst}}. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 15:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:142.68.17.77]] reported by [[User:Aloha27]] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|CBN (AM)}}

'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|142.68.17.77}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' 

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1059442589|13:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1059441584 by [[Special:Contributions/Aloha27|Aloha27]] ([[User talk:Aloha27|talk]])"
# {{diff2|1059435848|12:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1059376287 by [[Special:Contributions/Aloha27|Aloha27]] ([[User talk:Aloha27|talk]]) Ramona Dearing no longer does Cross Talk"
# {{diff2|1059374727|02:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1059335740 by [[Special:Contributions/Aloha27|Aloha27]] ([[User talk:Aloha27|talk]])"

'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

Block evasion Again. IP JUST came off a two week block by Jezebel's Ponyo. 
SPI case exists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/47.55.50.49 <span style="border:1px solid #FFFFFF">[[User:Aloha27|<b style="color:#9E0508;background:#FFFFFF">&nbsp; Aloha27</b>]] [[User talk:Aloha27|<span style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#9E0508">&nbsp;<small>talk</small>&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 13:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:2A04:4A43:4D7E:8961:611C:579A:C33A:C141]] reported by [[User:Wiqi55]] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dhu al-Qarnayn}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2A04:4A43:4D7E:8961:611C:579A:C33A:C141}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=1058263127&oldid=1058261502]

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=1058470071&oldid=1058461808]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=1058828227&oldid=1058821217]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=1059273042&oldid=1059137120]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=1059368062&oldid=1059301815]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=1059369763&oldid=1059368062]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=1059433192&oldid=1059415060]

'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2A04:4A43:4D7E:8D64:183D:9F5C:9D64:7922]

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' User talk:

# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2A04:4A43:4D7E:8D64:183D:9F5C:9D64:7922&diff=1058822247&oldid=1058461594 Comment in warning]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2A04:4A43:4D7E:A4CA:6DED:5FC8:82A4:F0EF Section in talk] (both linked in edit summaries: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=prev&oldid=1059137120] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=prev&oldid=1059415060])

'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2A04:4A43:4D7E:8961:611C:579A:C33A:C141]

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

Dynamic IP is replacing long-standing sourced content with poorly-sourced personal opinion. They use specious edit summaries to claim that sources were provided even though their sources failed verification (no mention of early Muslim commentators). They also ignored my requests for quotes in edit summaries (e.g., [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhu_al-Qarnayn&diff=prev&oldid=1058423722]) and on their talkpage ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2A04:4A43:4D7E:8D64:183D:9F5C:9D64:7922&diff=1058822247&oldid=1058461594], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2A04:4A43:4D7E:A4CA:6DED:5FC8:82A4:F0EF]). I had asked for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&diff=prev&oldid=1058913196 page protection] to force the IP to talk, I was advised to warn the user and report them to AIV or ANI. It's been a while since I've been in a dispute so I hope this is the right forum. [[User:Wiqi55|<b style="color: #4682B4;">Wiqi</b>]][[User talk:Wiqi55|<sup style="color: #99BADD;">(55)</sup>]] 14:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

== [[User:49.178.80.27]] reported by [[User:Laterthanyouthink]] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Patty Hearst}}

'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|49.178.80.27}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' 

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1059447958|14:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Criminal as per article."
# {{diff2|1059402034|06:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Criminal, as per the article. These are not my words."
# {{diff2|1059401846|06:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "How about criminal."
# {{diff2|1059217322|04:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)}} "It says she was a member of Symbionese"

'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
#  {{diff2|1059400450|06:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Welcome to Wikipedia!"
#  {{diff2|1059401042|06:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on [[:Modern history of Saudi Arabia]]."
#  {{diff2|1059401998|06:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "General note: Unconstructive editing on [[:Patty Hearst]]."
#  {{diff2|1059402366|06:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion."
#  {{diff2|1059516080|22:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} "Warning: Disruptive editing on [[:Patty Hearst]]."

'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

Same behaviour on Patty Hearst article [[User:Laterthanyouthink|Laterthanyouthink]] ([[User talk:Laterthanyouthink|talk]]) 22:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)