View source for Discrimination

{{Short description|Prejudicial treatment based on membership in a certain group}}
{{About| prejudicial treatment|the ability to distinguish one thing from another|Discrimination (information)}}
{{Distinguish|Discriminant}}
{{Redirect|Bigot}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2020}}
[[File:Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler in streetcar terminal, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma by Russell Lee.jpg |thumb|272px|An African-American man drinking from a [[Racial segregation in the United States|racially segregated]] water cooler marked "Colored", in [[Oklahoma City]] {{circa|1939}}|alt=]]
{{Discrimination sidebar|state=collapsed}}
'''Discrimination''' is the process of making unfair or prejudicial [[Distinction (sociology)|distinctions]] between people based on the groups, classes, or other categories to which they belong or are perceived to belong,<ref>{{Cite web|title=What drives discrimination and how do we stop it?|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/discrimination/|access-date=2020-10-13|website=www.amnesty.org|publisher=[[Amnesty International]]|language=en|quote=Discrimination occurs when a person is unable to enjoy his or her human rights or other legal rights on an equal basis with others because of an unjustified distinction made in policy, law or treatment.}}</ref> such as [[Racial discrimination|race]], [[Sexism|gender]], [[Ageism|age]], [[Class discrimination|class]], [[Religious discrimination|religion]], or [[Sexual orientation discrimination|sexual orientation]].<ref name="apa-discrimination">{{Cite web|date=2019-10-31|title=Discrimination: What it is, and how to cope|url=https://www.apa.org/topics/discrimination|access-date=2020-10-13|publisher=[[American Psychological Association]] |quote=Discrimination is the unfair or prejudicial treatment of people and groups based on characteristics such as race, gender, age or sexual orientation.}}</ref> Discrimination typically leads to groups being unfairly treated on the basis of perceived statuses based on ethnic, racial, gender or religious categories.<ref name="apa-discrimination"/><ref>{{cite web|title=discrimination, definition|url=http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/american-english/discrimination |work=Cambridge Dictionaries Online|publisher=Cambridge University|access-date=March 29, 2013}}</ref> It involves depriving members of one group of opportunities or privileges that are available to members of another group.<ref>Introduction to sociology. 7th ed. New York: [[W. W. Norton & Company]] Inc, 2009. p. 334.</ref>

Discriminatory traditions, policies, ideas, practices and laws exist in many countries and [[institution]]s in all parts of the world, including some, where such discrimination is generally decried. In some places, countervailing measures such as quotas have been used to redress the balance in favor of those who are believed to be current or past victims of discrimination. These attempts have often been met with controversy, and sometimes been called [[reverse discrimination]]. 

==Etymology==

The term ''discriminate'' appeared in the early 17th century in the English language. It is from the [[Latin language|Latin]] ''discriminat-'' 'distinguished between', from the verb ''discriminare'', from ''discrimen'' 'distinction', from the verb ''discernere'' (corresponding to "to discern").<ref>{{cite web|title=Definition of discrimination; Origin|url=http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/discriminate?q=discriminate|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514145943/http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/discriminate?q=discriminate|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 14, 2013|work=Oxford Dictionaries|publisher= Oxford University|access-date=January 14, 2013}}</ref> Since the [[American Civil War]] the term "discrimination" generally evolved in [[American English]] usage as an understanding of prejudicial treatment of an individual based solely on their race, later generalized as membership in a certain socially undesirable [[Social group|group]] or social category.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Introduction to sociology |publisher=[[W. W. Norton & Company]] Inc. |year=2009 |edition=7th |location=New York |page=324 |medium=Print}}</ref> 
Before this sense of the word became almost universal, it was a synonym for discernment, tact and culture as in "taste and discrimination", generally a laudable attribute; to "discriminate against" being commonly disparaged.<ref>{{cite book|editor=Simpson, J.A. |title=The Oxford Dictionary |edition=2nd |year=1989 |volume=IV |page=758 |publisher=Clarendon Press |isbn=0-19861216-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Macquarie Concise Thesaurus — Australia's National Thesaurus |editor=Richard Tardif |year=1985 |publisher=The Macquarie Library |isbn=0-94975797-7}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=January 2024}}

==Definitions==

Moral philosophers{{who|date=November 2024}} have defined{{when|reason=When was this definition ratified?|date=November 2024}} discrimination using a [[Morality|moralized]] definition. Under this approach, discrimination is defined as acts, practices, or policies that wrongfully impose a relative disadvantage or deprivation on persons based on their membership in a salient social group.<ref>{{Citation|last=Altman|first=Andrew|title=Discrimination|date=2020|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/discrimination/|encyclopedia=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Summer 2020|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|quote=[A]s a reasonable first approximation, we can say that discrimination consists of acts, practices, or policies that impose a relative disadvantage on persons based on their membership in a salient social group. [...] [W]e can refine the first-approximation account of discrimination and say that the moralized concept of discrimination is properly applied to acts, practices or policies that meet two conditions: a) they wrongfully impose a relative disadvantage or deprivation on persons based on their membership in some salient social group, and b) the wrongfulness rests (in part) on the fact that the imposition of the disadvantage is on account of the group membership of the victims.|access-date=2020-10-13}}</ref> This is a comparative definition. An individual need not be actually harmed in order to be discriminated against. They just needs to be treated ''worse'' than others for some arbitrary reason. If someone decides to donate to help orphan children, but decides to donate less, say, to children of a particular race out of a racist attitude, they will be acting in a discriminatory way even if they actually benefit the people they discriminate against by donating some money to them.<ref>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, "Private Discrimination: A Prioritarian, Desert-Accommodating Account", ''San Diego Law Review'', 43, 817–856 (2006); Oscar Horta, "Discrimination in Terms of Moral Exclusion", ''Theoria: Swedish Journal of Philosophy'', 76, 346–364 (2010).</ref> Discrimination also develops into a source of [[oppression]], the action of recognizing someone as 'different' so much that they are treated inhumanly and degraded.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Thompson |first=Neil |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nVIJDAAAQBAJ&q=equality&pg=PP1 |title=Anti-Discriminatory Practice: Equality, Diversity and Social Justice |date=2016 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-137-58666-7 |language=en }}{{Dead link|date=February 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>

This moralized definition of discrimination is distinct from a non-moralized definition—in the former, discrimination is wrong by definition, whereas in the latter, this is not the case.<ref name="Altman 2020">{{Citation |last=Altman |first=Andrew |title=Discrimination |date=2020 |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/discrimination/ |encyclopedia=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Summer 2020 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2020-12-29}}</ref>

The [[United Nations]] stance on discrimination includes the statement: "Discriminatory behaviors take many forms, but they all involve some form of exclusion or rejection."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cyberschoolbus.un.org/discrim/id_8_ud_print.asp |title=United Nations CyberSchoolBus: What is discrimination? |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140601211521/http://cyberschoolbus.un.org/discrim/id_8_ud_print.asp |archive-date=2014-06-01 }}</ref> The [[United Nations Human Rights Council]] and other international bodies work towards helping ending discrimination around the world.

==Types==

===Age===

{{Main|Ageism|Adultism}}
[[Ageism]] or age discrimination is discrimination and stereotyping based on the grounds of someone's age.<ref>{{cite web|title=Definition of Ageism|url=http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ageism?q=ageism|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514145002/http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ageism?q=ageism|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 14, 2013|work=Oxford Dictionaries|publisher=Oxford University Press|access-date=December 4, 2012}}</ref> It is a set of beliefs, norms, and values which used to justify discrimination or subordination based on a person's age.<ref name="KirkpatrickKatsiaficas1987">{{cite book|last1=Kirkpatrick|first1=George R.|last2=Katsiaficas|first2=George N.|last3=Kirkpatrick|first3=Robert George|author4=Mary Lou Emery|title=Introduction to critical sociology|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xdf2QupEaHgC&pg=PA261|access-date=January 28, 2011|year=1987|publisher=Ardent Media|isbn=978-0-8290-1595-9|page=261}}</ref> Ageism is most often directed toward elderly people, or adolescents and children.<ref>Wilkinson J and Ferraro K, "Thirty Years of Ageism Research". In Nelson T (ed). ''Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons''. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002</ref><ref>[http://www.youthrights.org/oppressed.php "Young and Oppressed"]. youthrights.org. Retrieved April 11, 2012. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728105250/http://www.youthrights.org/oppressed.php |date=July 28, 2011}}</ref>

Age discrimination in hiring has been shown to exist in the United States. Joanna Lahey, professor at The [[Bush School of Government and Public Service]] at [[Texas A&M]], found that firms are more than 40% more likely to interview a young adult job applicant than an older job applicant.<ref>Lahey, J. (2005) [https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib33.html Do Older Workers Face Discrimination?] Boston College. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120414230847/https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib33.html |date=April 14, 2012}}</ref> In Europe, Stijn Baert, Jennifer Norga, Yannick Thuy and Marieke Van Hecke, researchers at [[Ghent University]], measured comparable ratios in Belgium. They found that age discrimination is heterogeneous by the activity older candidates undertook during their additional post-educational years. In Belgium, they are only discriminated if they have more years of inactivity or irrelevant employment.<ref>Baert, S., Norga, J., Thuy, Y., Van Hecke, M. (In press) [http://users.ugent.be/~sbaert/BaertNorgaThuyVanHecke_GettingGreyHairs_JEP.pdf Getting Grey Hairs in the Labour Market: An Alternative Experiment on Age Discrimination] Journal of Economic Psychology.</ref>

In a survey for the [[University of Kent]], England, 29% of respondents stated that they had suffered from age discrimination. This is a higher proportion than for [[Sexism|gender]] or [[Racism|racial]] discrimination. [[Dominic Abrams]], social psychology professor at the university, concluded that ageism is the most pervasive form of [[prejudice]] experienced in the UK population.<ref>(2006) [http://www.ageconcern.org.uk/AgeConcern/media/how_ageist_is_britain.pdf How Ageist is Britain?] London: Age Concern. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051027165812/http://www.ageconcern.org.uk/AgeConcern/media/how_ageist_is_britain.pdf |date=October 27, 2005}}</ref>

===Caste===
{{See also|Caste}}

According to [[UNICEF]] and [[Human Rights Watch]], [[caste]] discrimination affects an estimated 250 million people worldwide and is mainly prevalent in parts of Asia (India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal, Japan) and Africa.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unicef.org/protection/index_discrimination.html|title=Discrimination|work=[[UNICEF]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110608013440/http://www.unicef.org/protection/index_discrimination.html|archive-date=2011-06-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://hrw.org/english/docs/2001/08/29/global1815.htm|title=Global Caste Discrimination|work=[[Human Rights Watch]]|access-date=April 26, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081115074446/http://hrw.org/english/docs/2001/08/29/global1815.htm|archive-date=November 15, 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> {{As of|2011}}, there were 200 million [[Dalit]]s or [[Scheduled Castes]] (formerly known as "untouchables") in India.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://idsn.org/india-official-dalit-population-exceeds-200-million/|title=India: Official Dalit population exceeds 200 million|date=May 29, 2013|publisher=International Dalit Solidarity Network|access-date=July 30, 2014}}</ref>

===Citizenship or nationality===
{{Main|Discrimination based on nationality}}
Discrimination on the basis of [[nationality]], [[citizenship]] or [[naturalization]] is usually included in [[Employment discrimination|employment laws]].<ref>[http://dwd.wisconsin.gov/er/discrimination_civil_rights/publication_erd_14009_pweb.htm Race, Color, National Origin and Ancestry], State of Wisconsin {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121024061935/http://dwd.wisconsin.gov/er/discrimination_civil_rights/publication_erd_14009_pweb.htm |date=October 24, 2012 }}</ref> It may vary from laws that regulate hiring and firing based on citizenship, to forced retirement, compensation and pay, etc., based on immigration status. In the [[Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf|GCC]] states, in the workplace, preferential treatment is given to full citizens, even though many of them lack experience or motivation to do the job. State benefits are also generally available for citizens only.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/emiratisation-wont-work-if-people-dont-want-to-learn|title=Emiratisation won't work if people don't want to learn|author=Ayesha Almazroui|access-date=April 26, 2016 |archive-date=April 26, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160426083228/http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/emiratisation-wont-work-if-people-dont-want-to-learn |url-status=dead |date=March 18, 2013 }}</ref> Citizenship discrimination may show as a "level of acceptance" in a team regarding new team members and employees who differ from the citizenship of the majority of team members.<ref>Christiane Schwieren, [http://sgr.sagepub.com/content/39/6/643.abstract Mechanisms Underlying Nationality-Based Discrimination in Teams. A Quasi-Experiment Testing Predictions From Social Psychology and Microeconomics] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151231234833/http://sgr.sagepub.com/content/39/6/643.abstract |date=2015-12-31 }}, Maastricht University</ref> Citizenship discrimination can be sometimes connected with racial discrimination<ref>{{cite web|title=Race and National Origin Discrimination|url=https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/frontpage/faq/race-origin.html|website=Office for Civil Rights|publisher=U.S. Department of Education|access-date=December 16, 2017}}</ref> although it can be separate.

===Class===
{{Excerpt|Class discrimination|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs}}

===Disability===
{{Main|Disability discrimination}}

Discrimination against people with [[Disability|disabilities]] in favor of people who are not is called [[ableism]] or [[disablism]]. Disability discrimination, which treats non-disabled individuals as the standard of 'normal living', results in public and private places and services, educational settings, and social services that are built to serve 'standard' people, thereby excluding those with various disabilities. Studies have shown that disabled people not only need employment in order to be provided with the opportunity to earn a living but they also need employment in order to sustain their mental health and well-being. Work fulfils a number of basic needs for an individual such as collective purpose, social contact, status, and activity.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Vornholt|first=Katharina|author2=Sjir Uitdewilligen |author3=Frans J.N. Nijhuis |title=Factors Affecting the Acceptance of People with Disabilities at Work: A Literature Review|journal=Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation|date=December 2013|volume=23|issue=4|pages=463–75|doi=10.1007/s10926-013-9426-0|pmid=23400588|s2cid=10038886|url=https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/309d145f-bd62-4b5b-826b-a08c64b00bb0}}</ref> A person with a disability is often found to be socially isolated and work is one way to reduce his or her isolation. In the United States, the [[Americans with Disabilities Act]] mandates the provision of equality of access to both buildings and services and is paralleled by similar acts in other countries, such as the [[Equality Act 2010]] in the UK.

===Excellence===
{{Excerpt|Discrimination of excellence|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs}}

===Language===
[[File:Corsican nationalism.jpg|thumb|Nationalists in [[Corsica]] sometimes spray-paint or shoot traffic signs in [[French language|French]].]]
{{Excerpt|Linguistic discrimination}}

===Name===
Discrimination based on a person's name may also occur, with researchers suggesting that this form of discrimination is present based on a name's meaning, its pronunciation, its uniqueness, its gender affiliation, and its racial affiliation.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 =Silberzhan | first1 =Raphael | title =It Pays to be Herr Kaiser | journal =Psychological Science | volume =24 | issue =12 | pages =2437–2444 | date =May 19, 2013 | doi =10.1177/0956797613494851 | pmid =24113624 | s2cid =30086487 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last =Laham | first =Simon | title =The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith more than Mr. Colquhoun | journal =Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | volume=48 | issue =2012 | pages =752–756 | date =December 9, 2011 | doi =10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.002 | s2cid =6757690 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last =Cotton | first =John | title =The "name game": affective and hiring reactions to first names | journal =Journal of Managerial Psychology | volume =23 | issue =1 | pages =18–39 | date =July 2007 | doi =10.1108/02683940810849648 | s2cid =4484088 | url =https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=mgmt_fac | url-access =subscription }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last =Bertrand | first =Marianne | title =Are Emily and Brendan More Employable than Lakisha and Jamaal? | journal =The American Economic Review | volume =94 | issue =4 | pages =991–1013 | date =September 2004 | doi =10.1257/0002828042002561 | url =http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00216.pdf }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = Easton | first=Stephen | title=Blind recruiting study suggests positive discrimination common in the APS | newspaper=The Mandarin | date=June 30, 2017 }}</ref> Research has further shown that real world recruiters spend an average of just six seconds reviewing each résumé before making their initial "fit/no fit" screen-out decision and that a person's name is one of the six things they focus on most.<ref>{{cite news | last = Smith | first =Jacquelyn | title =Here's What Recruiters Look At In The 6 Seconds They Spend On Your Résumé | newspaper =Business Insider | date =November 4, 2014 }}</ref> France has made it illegal to view a person's name on a résumé when screening for the initial list of most qualified candidates. Great Britain, Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands have also experimented with name-blind summary processes.<ref>{{cite news | title =No names, no bias | newspaper =The Economist | date =October 29, 2015 }}</ref> Some apparent discrimination may be explained by other factors such as name frequency.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 =Silberzhan | first1=Raphael | last2=Simonsohn | first2=Uri | last3=Uhlmann| first3=Eric| title =Matched-Names Analysis Reveals No Evidence of Name-Meaning Effects: A Collaborative Commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann | journal = Psychological Science | volume =25 | issue =7 | pages =1504–1505 | date =February 4, 2014|url=http://www.socialjudgments.com/docs/Silberzahn_Simonsohn_Uhlmann_2014_Collaborative_Commentary_and_Online_Supplement.pdf | doi=10.1177/0956797614533802 | pmid=24866920 | s2cid=26814316 }}</ref> The effects of name discrimination based on a name's fluency is subtle, small and subject to significantly changing norms.<ref>{{cite news | title =The Power of Names | newspaper =The New York Times | date =May 29, 2013 }}</ref>

===Race or ethnicity===

{{Main|Racism|Racial discrimination|Discrimination based on skin color|Ethnic penalty|Racial segregation}}
[[File:Anti Arab sign in Pattaya Beach Thailand.jpg|thumb|[[Anti-Arabism|Anti-Arab]] sign in [[Pattaya Beach]], [[Thailand]]]]
[[File:No entrance for poles1.jpeg|thumb|German warning in [[Occupation of Poland (1939–1945)|German-occupied Poland]] 1939 – "[[Nur für Deutsche|No entrance for Poles]]!"|left]]
[[File:37431682 eb5832e644.jpg|left|thumb|[[Racial antisemitism|Antisemitic]] graffiti in [[Lithuania]]. The words read ''Juden raus'' (German for ''Jews out'') and ''Hasse'' (presumably a misspelling of ''Hass'', German for ''hate'').]]
[[Image:Segregation 1938b.jpg|right|thumb|250px|An [[African-American]] child at a segregated drinking fountain on a courthouse lawn, [[North Carolina]], US 1938]]

Racial and ethnic discrimination differentiates individuals on the basis of real and perceived racial and ethnic differences and leads to various forms of the [[ethnic penalty]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kislev|first=Elyakim|date=2016-09-19|title=Deciphering the 'Ethnic Penalty' of Immigrants in Western Europe: A Cross-Classified Multilevel Analysis|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-016-1451-x|journal=Social Indicators Research|volume=134|issue=2|pages=725–745|doi=10.1007/s11205-016-1451-x|s2cid=157454886|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref name="carmichael & woods, 2000">{{cite journal | title=Ethnic Penalties in Unemployment and Occupational Attainment: Evidence for Britain |author1=Carmichael, F. |author2=Woods, R. | journal=International Review of Applied Economics | year=2000 | volume=14 | issue=1 | pages=71–98 | doi=10.1080/026921700101498|s2cid=154020583 }}</ref> It can also refer to the belief that groups of humans possess different behavioral traits corresponding to physical appearance and can be divided based on the [[Supremacism|superiority]] of one [[Race (human categorization)|race]] over another.<ref name="Dennis">{{cite journal|author=Dennis, Rutledge M.|title=Social Darwinism, scientific racism, and the metaphysics of race|journal=Journal of Negro Education|volume=64|issue=3|pages=243–52|year=1995|doi=10.2307/2967206|jstor=2967206}}</ref><ref name="oxforddictionaries.com">[https://web.archive.org/web/20120708012611/http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism Racism] Oxford Dictionaries</ref><ref name="Ghani">{{cite book |last=Ghani |first=Navid |editor-last=Schaefer |editor-first=Richard T. |title=Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Society |date=2008 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4129-2694-2 |pages=1113–1115 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YMUola6pDnkC&q=racism |chapter=Racism}}</ref><ref name="newman, D.M.">{{cite book | last = Newman | first = D. M. | title = Sociology : exploring the architecture of everyday life | publisher = SAGE | location = Los Angeles | year = 2012 | edition = 9th | isbn = 978-1-4129-8729-5 | page = 405 | quote = racism: Belief that humans are subdivided into distinct groups that are different in their social behavior and innate capacities and that can be ranked as superior or inferior.}}</ref> It may also mean [[prejudice]], discrimination, or antagonism directed against other people because they are of a different race or [[ethnicity]].<ref name="oxforddictionaries.com"/><ref name="Ghani"/>

Modern variants of [[racism]] are often based in social perceptions of biological differences between peoples. These views can take the form of [[social actions]], practices or beliefs, or [[political systems]] in which different races are ranked as inherently superior or inferior to each other, based on presumed shared inheritable traits, abilities, or qualities.<ref name="oxforddictionaries.com"/><ref name="Ghani"/><ref name="newman">{{cite book | last = Newman | first = D.M. | title = Sociology: exploring the architecture of everyday life | publisher = Sage | location = Los Angeles | year = 2012 | edition = 9th | isbn = 978-1-4129-8729-5 | page = 405 | quote = racism: Belief that humans are subdivided into distinct groups that are different in their social behavior and innate capacities and that can be ranked as superior or inferior.}}</ref> It has been official government policy in several countries, such as [[South Africa]] during the [[apartheid]] era. Discriminatory policies towards ethnic minorities include the race-based discrimination against ethnic [[Malaysian Indian|Indians]] and Chinese in Malaysia<ref>"[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7121534.stm Malaysia's lingering ethnic divide]". March 4, 2008. BBC News.</ref> The concept of multiracism has been used to explain the varieties of race discrimination.<ref>Bonnett, A. 2022, ''Multiracism'', Polity, ISBN 978-1509537327</ref> After the [[Vietnam War]], many [[Vietnamese boat people|Vietnamese refugees]] moved to Australia and the United States, where they faced discrimination.<ref>Levine, Bertram. (2005). "Not All Black and White". J. Cropp (Ed.), ''Resolving Racial Conflict'', 193–218. London: University of Missouri Press.</ref>
Westerners might get paid more than other immigrants in [[Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf|GCC]] states.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thenational.ae/uae/western-workers-favoured-in-uae-survey-respondents-say-1.21895|title='Western workers favoured in UAE', survey respondents say|website=The National|date=April 18, 2015|language=en|access-date=2019-07-08}}</ref>

===Region===

{{see also|Regional discrimination in China}}
Regional or geographic discrimination is a form of discrimination that is based on the region in which a person lives or the region in which a person was born. It differs from national discrimination because it may not be based on national borders or the country in which the victim lives, instead, it is based on prejudices against a specific region of one or more countries. Examples include discrimination against Chinese people who were born in regions of the countryside that are far away from cities that are located within China, and discrimination against [[Americans]] who are from the [[Southern United States|southern]] or [[Northern United States|northern]] regions of the United States. It is often accompanied by discrimination that is based on accent, dialect, or cultural differences.<ref name="Accent">{{Cite web | url=https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/accent-discrimination/ | title=Accent Discrimination Law and Legal Definition|publisher=USLegal}}</ref>

===Religious beliefs===
{{Main|Religious discrimination|Religious exclusivism}}

{{Status of religious freedom}}
[[File:Lotshampa refugees in Beldangi Camp.jpg|thumb|In the 1990s, Bhutan [[Bhutanese refugees|expelled its Hindu population or forced it to leave the country]] in order to preserve [[Bhutan]]'s Buddhist culture and identity.]]
Religious discrimination is valuing or treating people or groups differently because of what they do or do not believe in or because of their feelings towards a given [[religion]]. For instance, the Jewish population of Germany, and indeed a large portion of Europe, was subjected to discrimination under [[Adolf Hitler]] and his Nazi party between 1933 and 1945. They were forced to live in ghettos, wear an identifying star of David on their clothes, and sent to concentration and death camps in rural Germany and Poland, where they were to be tortured and killed, all because of their Jewish religion. Many laws (most prominently the Nuremberg Laws of 1935) separated those of Jewish faith as supposedly inferior to the Christian population.

Restrictions on the types of occupations that [[Jews|Jewish]] people could hold were imposed by Christian authorities. Local rulers and church officials closed many professions to religious Jews, pushing them into marginal roles that were considered socially inferior, such as tax and rent collecting and [[moneylending]], occupations that were only tolerated as a "[[necessary evil]]".<ref>"[https://web.archive.org/web/20050721005923/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0718_050718_ashkenazim.html Did Discrimination Enhance Intelligence of Jews?]". National Geographic News. July 18, 2005 </ref> The number of Jews who were permitted to reside in different places was limited; they were concentrated in [[ghetto]]s and banned from owning land. In Saudi Arabia, non-[[Muslim]]s are not allowed to publicly practice their religions and they cannot enter [[Mecca]] and [[Medina]].<ref name="mackeymecca">[[Sandra Mackey]]'s account of her attempt to enter Mecca in {{cite book|title=The Saudis: Inside the Desert Kingdom|last=Mackey|first=Sandra|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|year=1987|isbn=978-0-393-32417-4|pages=63–64}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> Furthermore, private non-Muslim religious gatherings might be raided by the [[religious police]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108492.htm|title=Saudi Arabia|last=Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information|first=Bureau of Public Affairs|date=2008-09-19|website=2001-2009.state.gov|language=en|access-date=2019-07-24}}</ref> In Maldives, non-Muslims living and visiting the country are prohibited from openly expressing their religious beliefs, holding public congregations to conduct religious activities, or involving Maldivians in such activities. Those expressing religious beliefs other than Islam may face imprisonment of up to five years or house arrest, fines ranging from 5,000 to 20,000 rufiyaa ($320 to $1,300), and deportation.<ref>{{cite web |title=Maldives |url=https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-report-on-international-religious-freedom/maldives/ |website=United States Department of State |access-date=30 March 2022}}</ref>

In a 1979 consultation on the issue, the United States commission on civil rights defined religious discrimination in relation to the [[Civil and political rights|civil rights]] which are guaranteed by the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]]. Whereas religious civil liberties, such as the right to hold or not to hold a religious belief, are essential for [[Freedom of Religion]] (in the United States as secured by the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]]), religious discrimination occurs when someone is denied "equal protection under the law, equality of status under the law, equal treatment in the administration of justice, and equality of opportunity and access to employment, education, housing, public services and facilities, and public accommodation because of their exercise of their right to religious freedom".<ref>U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1979: ''Religious discrimination. A neglected issue. A consultation sponsored by the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington. D.C., April 9–10, 1979''</ref>

===Sex, sex characteristics, gender, and gender identity ===
{{Main|Sexism}}
{{See also|Homophobia|Misogyny|Misandry|Discrimination against intersex people|Transphobia||Discrimination against non-binary gender persons|Violence against LGBT people}}

[[Sexism]] is a form of discrimination based on a person's sex or gender. It has been linked to [[stereotype]]s and [[gender role]]s,<ref>{{cite book |last=Matsumoto |first=David |title=The Handbook of Culture and Psychology |url=https://archive.org/details/handbookculturep00mats |url-access=limited |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-19-513181-9 |page=[https://archive.org/details/handbookculturep00mats/page/n213 197] }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Nakdimen |first=K. A. |title=The Physiognomic Basis of Sexual Stereotyping |journal=[[American Journal of Psychiatry]] |year=1984 |volume=141 |issue=4 |pages=499–503 |doi=10.1176/ajp.141.4.499 |pmid=6703126 }}</ref> and may include the belief that one sex or gender is intrinsically superior to another.<ref name=":0a">{{Cite book|title=SOC 2018|last=Witt|first=Jon|date=2017|publisher=McGraw-Hill Education|isbn=9781259702723|edition=5th|location=New York|oclc=968304061}}{{page needed|date=May 2018}}</ref> Extreme sexism may foster [[sexual harassment]], [[rape]], and other forms of [[sexual violence]].<ref>Forcible Rape Institutionalized Sexism in the Criminal Justice System| Gerald D. Robin Division of Criminal Justice, University of New Haven</ref> Gender discrimination may encompass sexism and is discrimination toward people based on their [[gender identity]]<ref name="Macklem">{{cite book |last=Macklem |first=Tony |year=2003 |title=Beyond Comparison: Sex and Discrimination |location=New York |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-82682-2 }}</ref> or their gender or sex differences.<ref name="Lenhart">{{cite book|title=Clinical Aspects of Sexual Harassment and Gender Discrimination: Psychological Consequences and Treatment Interventions|author=Sharyn Ann Lenhart|publisher=[[Routledge]]|year=2004|isbn=978-1135941314|page=6|access-date=April 20, 2018|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Rt2SAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA6|quote=GENDER OR SEX DISCRIMINATION: This term refers to the types of gender bias that have a negative impact. The term has legal, as well as theoretical and psychological, definitions. Psychological consequences can be more readily inferred from the latter, but both definitions are of significance. Theoretically, gender discrimination has been described as (1) the unequal rewards that men and women receive in the workplace or academic environment because of their gender or sex difference (DiThomaso, 1989); (2) a process occurring in work or educational settings in which an individual is overtly or covertly limited access to an opportunity or a resource because of a sex or is given the opportunity or the resource reluctantly and may face harassment for picking it (Roeske & Pleck, 1983); or (3) both.}}</ref> Gender discrimination is especially defined in terms of [[workplace inequality]].<ref name="Lenhart"/> It may arise from social or cultural customs and norms.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/12/football/iran-blue-girl-sahar-khodayari-spt-intl/index.html|title=FIFA must act after death of Iran's 'Blue Girl,' says activist|author=Christina Macfarlane, Sean Coppack and James Masters|website=CNN|date=September 12, 2019 }}</ref>

[[Intersex]] persons experience [[Discrimination against intersex people|discrimination]] due to innate, atypical [[sex characteristics]]. Multiple jurisdictions now protect individuals on grounds of ''intersex status'' or ''[[sex characteristics]]''. South Africa was the first country to explicitly add intersex to legislation, as part of the attribute of 'sex'.<ref>[http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/2005-022.pdf Judicial Matters Amendment Act, No. 22 of 2005] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018193130/http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/2005-022.pdf |date=October 18, 2017 }}, Republic of South Africa, Vol. 487, Cape Town, January 11, 2006.</ref> Australia was the first country to add an independent attribute, of 'intersex status'.<ref name="expmem">{{cite web|url=http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fems%2Fr5026_ems_1fcd9245-33ff-4b3a-81b9-7fdc7eb91b9b%22 |title=Australian Parliament, Explanatory Memorandum to the Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Bill 2013 |access-date=October 6, 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141219231017/http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p%3Bquery%3DId%3A%22legislation/ems/r5026_ems_1fcd9245-33ff-4b3a-81b9-7fdc7eb91b9b%22 |archive-date=December 19, 2014}}</ref><ref>[http://oii.org.au/21774/welcome-senate-inquiry-anti-discrimination/ We welcome the Senate Inquiry report on the Exposure Draft of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill 2012] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140101205811/http://oii.org.au/21774/welcome-senate-inquiry-anti-discrimination/ |date=2014-01-01}}, [[Organisation Intersex International Australia]], February 21, 2013.</ref> Malta was the first to adopt a broader framework of 'sex characteristics', through legislation that also ended modifications to the sex characteristics of minors undertaken for social and cultural reasons.<ref name="gate-malta">{{cite web |url=http://transactivists.org/2015/04/08/making-depathologization-a-matter-of-law-a-comment-from-gate-on-the-maltese-act-on-gender-identity-gender-expression-and-sex-characteristics/ |title=Making depathologization a matter of law. A comment from GATE on the Maltese Act on Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics |last1=Cabral |first1=Mauro |author-link=Mauro Cabral |date=April 8, 2015 |publisher=[[Global Action for Trans Equality]] |access-date=2015-07-03 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150704213308/http://transactivists.org/2015/04/08/making-depathologization-a-matter-of-law-a-comment-from-gate-on-the-maltese-act-on-gender-identity-gender-expression-and-sex-characteristics/ |archive-date=July 4, 2015}}</ref><ref name="oiieu-malta">{{Cite web |last= |date=April 1, 2015 |title=OII-Europe applauds Malta's Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics Act. This is a landmark case for intersex rights within European law reform |url=http://oiieurope.org/press-release-oii-europe-applauds-maltas-gender-identity-gender-expression-and-sex-characteristics-act/ |access-date=2023-01-17 |website=Oii Europe}}</ref> Global efforts such as the United Nations [[Sustainable Development Goal 5]] is also aimed at ending all forms of discrimination on the basis of gender and sex.<ref>{{Cite web|last=sdgcounting|date=2017-06-06|title=SDG 5 Indicators|url=https://medium.com/sdgs-resources/sdg-5-indicators-5fe7d2b13b58|access-date=2020-09-23|website=Medium|language=en}}</ref>

===Sexual orientation===

[[File:Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2015 Parade-17b.jpg|thumb|LGBT activists at [[Cologne Pride]] carrying a banner with the flags of over 70 countries where [[LGBT rights by country or territory|homosexuality is illegal]]]]
[[File:Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill protest.jpg|thumb|right|Protests in [[LGBT culture in New York City|New York City]] against [[Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill|Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Bill]]]]
{{See also|Heterosexism|Heteronormativity|Biphobia|Homophobia}}

One's [[sexual orientation]] is a "predilection for homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality".<ref>''World English Dictionary'', [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sexual+orientation "Sexual Orientation"]</ref> Like most minority groups, homosexuals and bisexuals are vulnerable to prejudice and discrimination from the majority group. They may experience hatred from others because of their sexuality; a term for such hatred based upon one's sexual orientation is often called [[homophobia]]. Many continue to hold negative feelings towards those with non-heterosexual orientations and will discriminate against people who have them or are thought to have them. People of other uncommon sexual orientations also experience discrimination. One study found its sample of heterosexuals to be more prejudiced against [[asexuality|asexual people]] than against homosexual or bisexual people.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Intergroup bias toward "Group X": Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals |first1=Cara C. |last1=MacInnis |first2=Gordon |last2=Hodson |journal=Group Processes & Intergroup Relations |doi=10.1177/1368430212442419 |volume=15 |number=6 |pages=725–743 |year=2012|s2cid=3056711 }}</ref>

[[Employment discrimination]] based on sexual orientation varies by country. Revealing a lesbian sexual orientation (by means of mentioning an engagement in a rainbow organisation or by mentioning one's partner name) lowers employment opportunities in [[Cyprus]] and Greece but overall, it has no negative effect in Sweden and Belgium.<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1080/13545701.2010.541858|title = Women's Sexual Orientation and Labor Market Outcomes in Greece| journal=Feminist Economics| volume=17| pages=89–117|year = 2011|last1 = Drydakis|first1 = Nick|s2cid = 154771144}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1108/IJM-02-2012-0026|title = Sexual orientation discrimination in the Cypriot labour market. Distastes or uncertainty?| journal=International Journal of Manpower| volume=35| issue=5| pages=720–744|year = 2014|last1 = Drydakis|first1 = Nick| hdl=10419/62444|s2cid = 10103299|url = https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6684| hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref>Ahmed, A. M., Andersson, L., Hammarstedt, M. (2011) [http://www.ifau.se/upload/pdf/se/2011/wp11-21-are-homosexuals-discriminated-against-in-the-hiring-process.pdf Are gays and lesbians discriminated against in the hiring situation?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150529055358/http://www.ifau.se/upload/pdf/se/2011/wp11-21-are-homosexuals-discriminated-against-in-the-hiring-process.pdf |date=2015-05-29 }} Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation Working Paper Series 21.</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1111/irj.12078|title = Career lesbians. Getting hired for not having kids?| journal=Industrial Relations Journal| volume=45| issue=6| pages=543–561|year = 2014|last1 = Baert|first1 = Stijn| citeseerx=10.1.1.467.2102|s2cid = 34331459}}</ref> In the latter country, even a positive effect of revealing a lesbian sexual orientation is found for women at their fertile ages.

Besides these academic studies, in 2009, [[International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association|ILGA]] published a report based on research carried out by Daniel Ottosson at Södertörn University College in [[Stockholm, Sweden]]. This research found that of the 80 countries around the world that continue to consider [[homosexuality]] illegal, five carry the [[Capital punishment|death penalty]] for homosexual activity, and two do in some regions of the country.<ref>"[https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7883204&page=1 New Benefits for Same-Sex Couples May Be Hard to Implement Abroad]". ABC News. June 22, 2009.</ref> In the report, this is described as "State sponsored homophobia".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ilga.org/statehomophobia/ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2009.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100502074613/http://www.ilga.org/statehomophobia/ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2009.pdf|url-status=dead|title=ILGA: 2009 Report on State Sponsored Homophobia (2009)|archive-date=May 2, 2010}}</ref> This happens in [[Muslim|Islamic]] states, or in two cases regions under Islamic authority.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ilga.org/news_results.asp?LanguageID=1&FileID=1111&ZoneID=7&FileCategory=50|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091029185853/http://www.ilga.org/news_results.asp?LanguageID=1&FileID=1111&ZoneID=7&FileCategory=50|url-status=dead|title=ILGA:7 countries still put people to death for same-sex acts|archive-date=October 29, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.religionfacts.com/homosexuality/islam.htm|title=Islamic views of homosexuality|access-date=April 26, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150415225546/http://www.religionfacts.com/homosexuality/islam.htm|archive-date=April 15, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> On February 5, 2005, the [[The New Humanitarian|IRIN]] issued a reported titled "Iraq: Male homosexuality still a taboo". The article stated, among other things that [[honor killings]] by Iraqis against a gay family member are common and given some legal protection.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irinnews.org/report.asp?ReportID=51540&SelectRegion=Middle_East|title=AU welcomes progress in peace process|work=IRIN|access-date=April 26, 2016|date=2004-09-29}}</ref> In August 2009, Human Rights Watch published an extensive report detailing torture of men accused of being [[LGBT rights in Iraq|gay in Iraq]], including the blocking of men's anuses with glue and then giving the men laxatives.<ref>"[https://www.hrw.org/en/node/85049/section/3 They Want Us Exterminated]". Human Rights Watch. August 16, 2009.</ref> Although gay marriage has been legal in [[South Africa]] since 2006, same-sex unions are often condemned as "un-African".<ref>Harrison, Rebecca. "[https://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE52C3MN20090313 South African gangs use rape to "cure" lesbians]". Reuters. March 13, 2009.</ref> Research conducted in 2009 shows 86% of black lesbians from the [[Western Cape]] live in fear of sexual assault.<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/12/eudy-simelane-corrective-rape-south-africa | title=Raped and killed for being a lesbian: South Africa ignores 'corrective' attacks| newspaper=The Guardian| date=2009-03-12| last1=Kelly| first1=Annie}}</ref>
{{further|LGBT rights by country or territory}}
[[File:NYC Pride 2019 05.jpg|thumb|The [[NYC Pride March]] is the [[List of largest LGBT events|world's largest LGBT event]]. Regional variation exists with respect to [[toleration|tolerance]], the [[antithesis]] of discrimination, in different parts of the world.]]
A number of countries, especially those in the [[Western world]], have passed measures to alleviate discrimination against sexual minorities, including laws against anti-gay [[hate crimes]] and workplace discrimination. Some have also legalized same-sex marriage or civil unions in order to grant same-sex couples the same protections and benefits as opposite-sex couples. In 2011, the [[United Nations]] passed its first resolution recognizing LGBT rights.

===Reverse discrimination===

{{Main|Reverse discrimination}}
{{see also|Bumiputera (Malaysia)}}
[[File:Protesto contra o sistema de cotas.jpg|thumb|upright|Students protesting against [[racial quota]]s in Brazil: "''Quer uma vaga? Passe no vestibular!''" ("Do you want a spot? Pass the entrance exam!")]]

[[Reverse discrimination]] is discrimination against members of a dominant or majority group, in favor of members of a minority or historically disadvantaged group.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Reverse Discrimination |url=https://www.findlaw.com/employment/employment-discrimination/reverse-discrimination.html |access-date=2023-01-17 |website=Findlaw |language=en-US}}</ref>

This discrimination may seek to redress [[social inequalities]] under which minority groups have had less access to privileges enjoyed by the majority group. In such cases it is intended to remove discrimination that minority groups may already face. Reverse discrimination can be defined as the unequal treatment of members of the majority groups resulting from preferential policies, as in college admissions or employment, intended to remedy earlier discrimination against minorities.<ref>{{cite web|title=Reverse Discrimination|url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/reverse+discrimination |website=dictionary.com}}</ref>

Conceptualizing [[affirmative action]] as reverse discrimination became popular in the early- to mid-1970s, a time period that focused on under-representation and action policies intended to remedy the effects of past discrimination in both government and the business world.<ref name="Embrick">{{cite book |last1=Embrick |first1=David G. |editor1-last=Schaefer |editor1-first=Richard T. |title=Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Society, Volume 1 |date=2008 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-41-292694-2 |pages=12–19 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YMUola6pDnkC&q=%22reverse+discrimination%22&pg=PT64 |chapter=Affirmative Action in Education}}</ref>

==Anti-discrimination laws==
{{Main|Anti-discrimination law|List of anti-discrimination acts}}{{Expand section|date=July 2022}}

=== Australia ===

* [[Racial Discrimination Act 1975]]
* [[Sex Discrimination Act 1984]]
* [[Disability Discrimination Act 1992]]
* [[Age Discrimination Act 2004]]

=== Canada ===

* [[Ontario Human Rights Code]] 1962
* [[Canadian Human Rights Act]] 1977<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca/eng/content/what-discrimination-1 |title=What is Discrimination? |publisher=Canadian Human Rights Commission |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180415190505/https://www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca/eng/content/what-discrimination-1 |archive-date=2018-04-15 |url-status=dead |access-date=2018-04-15}}</ref>

=== Hong Kong ===

* Sex Discrimination Ordinance (1996){{citation needed|date=March 2022}}

=== India ===
[[Article 15 of the Constitution of India]] prohibits discrimination against any citizen on grounds of caste, religion, sex, race or place of birth etc.<ref>{{cite web |title=What is Article 15 of the Indian Constitution? Important Features and Provisions |url=https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/article-15-1561544384-1 |website=Jagranjosh.com |date=May 12, 2020}}</ref> Similarly, the [[Constitution of India]] guarantees several rights to all citizens irrespective of gender, such as [[right to equality]] under Article 14, right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.<ref>{{cite web |title= Women rights in India |url= http://www.womenlawsindia.com/legal-awareness/women-rights-in-india/ |access-date= January 13, 2024 |archive-date= December 6, 2023 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20231206140643/http://www.womenlawsindia.com/legal-awareness/women-rights-in-india/ |url-status= dead }}</ref> 

[[Indian Penal Code]], 1860 (Section 153 A) – Criminalises the use of language that promotes discrimination or violence against people on the basis of race, caste, sex, place of birth, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation or any other category.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-02-25 |title=Pawan Khera arrest {{!}} Section 153A: its use and misuse |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/section-153a-its-use-and-misuse-pawan-khera-arrest-supreme-court-8465400/ |access-date=2024-01-13 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref>

=== Israel ===

* [[Prohibition of Discrimination in Products, Services and Entry into Places of Entertainment and Public Places Law, 2000]]
* [[Employment (Equal Opportunities) Law, 1988]]
* [[:he:חוק_שוויון_זכויות_לאנשים_עם_מוגבלות|Law of Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities, 1998]]

=== Netherlands ===

* Article 137c, part 1 of [[Wetboek van Strafrecht]] prohibits insults towards a group because of its race, religion, sexual orientation (straight or gay), handicap (somatically, mental or psychiatric) in public or by speech, by writing or by a picture. Maximum imprisonment one year of imprisonment or a fine of the third category.<ref name="c3">€ 7,800</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001854/TweedeBoek/TitelV/Artikel137c/geldigheidsdatum_27-12-2012|title=wetten.nl – Regeling – Wetboek van Strafrecht – BWBR0001854|access-date=April 26, 2016}}</ref>
* Part 2 increases the maximum imprisonment to two years and the maximum fine category to 4,<ref name="c4">€ 19,500</ref> when the crime is committed as a habit or is committed by two or more persons.
* Article 137d prohibits provoking to discrimination or hate against the group described above. Same penalties apply as in article 137c.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001854/TweedeBoek/TitelV/Artikel137d/geldigheidsdatum_27-12-2012|title=wetten.nl – Regeling – Wetboek van Strafrecht – BWBR0001854|access-date=April 26, 2016}}</ref>
* Article 137e part 1 prohibits publishing a discriminatory statement, other than in formal message, or hands over an object (that contains discriminatory information) otherwise than on his request. Maximum imprisonment is 6 months or a fine of the third category.<ref name="c3" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001854/TweedeBoek/TitelV/Artikel137e/geldigheidsdatum_27-12-2012|title=wetten.nl – Regeling – Wetboek van Strafrecht – BWBR0001854|access-date=April 26, 2016}}</ref>
* Part 2 increases the maximum imprisonment to one year and the maximum fine category to 4,<ref name="c4" /> when the crime is committed as a habit or committed by two or more persons.
* Article 137f prohibits supporting discriminatory activities by giving money or goods. Maximum imprisonment is 3 months or a fine of the second category.<ref name="c2">€ 3,900</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001854/TweedeBoek/TitelV/Artikel137f/geldigheidsdatum_27-12-2012|title=wetten.nl – Regeling – Wetboek van Strafrecht – BWBR0001854|access-date=April 26, 2016}}</ref>

=== United Kingdom ===

* [[Equal Pay Act 1970]] – provides for equal pay for comparable work.
* [[Sex Discrimination Act 1975]] – makes discrimination against women or men, including discrimination on the grounds of marital status, illegal in the workplace.
* [[Human Rights Act 1998]] – provides more scope for redressing all forms of discriminatory imbalances.
* [[Equality Act 2010]] – consolidates, updates and supplements the prior Acts and Regulations that formed the basis of [[anti-discrimination law]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Equality considerations under the Equality Act 2010, including fulfilment of the PSED for the Collective Agreed Framework in relation to annual leave payments: additional guidance|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-holiday-pay-for-voluntary-overtime-equalities-impact-assessment/equality-considerations-under-the-equality-act-2010-including-fulfilment-of-the-psed-for-the-collective-agreed-framework-in-relation-to-annual-leave|access-date=2021-07-05|website=GOV.UK|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Chapter 1: Introduction and overview of the programme|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/access-to-work-holistic-assessments-provider-guidance/chapter-1-introduction-and-overview-of-the-programme|access-date=2021-07-05|website=GOV.UK|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Equality Act 2010: guidance|url=https://www.gov.uk/guidance/equality-act-2010-guidance|access-date=2021-07-05|website=GOV.UK|date=June 16, 2015 |language=en}}</ref>

=== United States ===

* [[Equal Pay Act of 1963]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.finduslaw.com/equal_pay_act_of_1963_epa_29_u_s_code_chapter_8_206_d|title=Equal Pay Act of 1963 – EPA – 29 U.S. Code Chapter 8 § 206(d)|access-date=April 26, 2016|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111123114909/http://finduslaw.com/equal_pay_act_of_1963_epa_29_u_s_code_chapter_8_206_d |archive-date=November 23, 2011}}</ref> – (part of the [[Fair Labor Standards Act]]) – prohibits wage discrimination by employers and labor organizations based on sex.
* [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]] – many provisions, including broadly prohibiting discrimination in the workplace including hiring, firing, workforce reduction, benefits, and sexually harassing conduct.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.finduslaw.com/civil_rights_act_of_1964_cra_title_vii_equal_employment_opportunities_42_us_code_chapter_21|title=Civil Rights Act of 1964 – CRA – Title VII – Equal Employment Opportunities – 42 US Code Chapter 21|access-date=April 26, 2016|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111229033506/http://finduslaw.com/civil_rights_act_of_1964_cra_title_vii_equal_employment_opportunities_42_us_code_chapter_21 |archive-date=December 29, 2011}}</ref>
* [[Fair Housing Act]] of 1968 prohibited discrimination in the sale or rental of housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability. The [[Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity]] is charged with administering and enforcing the Act.
* [[Pregnancy Discrimination Act|Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978]], which amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – covers discrimination based upon pregnancy in the workplace.<ref>{{cite web
 |title=Pregnancy Discrimination Act
 |url=http://employment.findlaw.com/employment/employment-employee-discrimination-harassment/employment-employee-pregnancy-discrimination-top/pregnancy-discrimination-act.html
 |access-date=2008-05-14}}</ref>
* [[Violence Against Women Act|Violence Against Women Act of 1994]]
* Many states have anti-discrimination laws, such as [[Florida]]'s civil rights laws found in State Statute 760.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://fchr.myflorida.com/history-of-the-florida-commission-on-human-relations|title=History of the Florida Commission on Human Relations|accessdate=2025-03-12|publisher=State of Florida}}</ref>

===United Nations documents===

Important UN documents addressing discrimination include:
* The [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]] is a declaration adopted by the [[United Nations General Assembly]] on December 10, 1948. It states that:" ''Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.''"<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141208080853/http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html|url-status=dead|title=The Universal Declaration of Human Rights<!-- Bot generated title -->|archive-date=December 8, 2014}}</ref>
* The [[International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination]] (ICERD) is a United Nations convention. The Convention commits its members to the elimination of [[racial discrimination]]. The convention was adopted and opened for signature by the United Nations General Assembly on December 21, 1965, and entered into force on January 4, 1969.
* The [[Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women]] (CEDAW) is an international treaty adopted in 1979 by the United Nations General Assembly. Described as an international [[bill of rights]] for women, it came into force on September 3, 1981.
* The [[Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]] is an international human rights instrument treaty of the United Nations. Parties to the convention are required to promote, protect, and ensure the full enjoyment of human rights by persons with disabilities and ensure that they enjoy full equality under the law. The text was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 13, 2006, and opened for signature on March 30, 2007. Following ratification by the 20th party, it came into force on May 3, 2008.

===Exemptions===
{{See also|Conscription and sexism|Religious exemption}}
The Anti-discrimination laws of most countries allow and make exceptions for [[discrimination based on nationality]] and immigration status.<ref name="Fennelly">{{Cite journal |last1=Fennelly |first1=David |title=Racial Discrimination and Nationality and Migration Exceptions: Reconciling CERD and the Race Equality Directive |last2=Murphy |first2=Clíodhna |date=2021 |journal=Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights |volume=39 |pages=308–328 |doi=10.1177/09240519211055648 |issue=4|s2cid=243839359 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The [[International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination]] (CERD) does not prohibit discrimination by nationality, citizenship or naturalization but forbids discrimination "against any particular nationality".<ref>[https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination]</ref>

== International cooperation ==

* Global Forum against Racism and Discrimination<ref>{{Cite web |title=Global Forum against Racism and Discrimination UNESCO |url=https://www.ohchr.org/en/2021/03/global-forum-against-racism-and-discrimination-unesco |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=OHCHR |language=en}}</ref>
* The International Coalition of Inclusive and Sustainable Cities (ICCAR) launched by UNESCO in 2004<ref>{{Cite web |title=ICCAR {{!}} ECCAR |url=https://www.eccar.info/en/iccar |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.eccar.info |language=en}}</ref>
* [[The Slave Route Project|Routes of Enslaved Peoples]] project 

==Theories and philosophy==

[[Social theories]] such as [[egalitarianism]] assert that [[social equality]] should prevail. In some societies, including most developed countries, each individual's civil rights include the right to be free from government sponsored social discrimination.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.weblocator.com/attorney/mn/law/concivrig.html#30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19991023101723/http://www.weblocator.com/attorney/mn/law/concivrig.html#30 |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 23, 1999 |title=Civil rights |access-date= March 20, 2019 }}
</ref> Due to a belief in the capacity to perceive pain or suffering shared by all animals, [[Abolitionism (animal rights)|abolitionist]] or [[Veganism|vegan]] egalitarianism maintains that the interests of every individual (regardless of their species), warrant [[equal consideration of interests|equal consideration]] with the interests of humans, and that not doing so is [[speciesist]].<ref name="singerethics-sentience">{{cite book |title=Practical Ethics |last=Singer |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Singer |orig-year=1993 |year=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0-521-43971-8 |edition=Second |pages=[https://archive.org/details/practicalethics00sing_0/page/57 57–58] |chapter=Equality for Animals? |quote=If a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration. ... This is why the limit of sentience&nbsp;... is the only defensible boundary of concern for the interests of others. ... Similarly those I would call 'speciesists' give greater weight to their own species when there is a clash between their interests and the interests of those of other species.|title-link=Practical Ethics }}</ref>

Philosophers have debated as to how inclusive the definition of discrimination should be. Some philosophers have argued that discrimination should only refer to wrongful or disadvantageous treatment in the context of a socially salient group (such as race, gender, sexuality etc.) within a given context. Under this view, failure to limit the concept of discrimination would lead to it being overinclusive; for example, since most murders occur because of some perceived difference between the perpetrator and the victim, many murders would constitute discrimination if the social salience requirement is not included. Thus this view argues that making the definition of discrimination overinclusive renders it meaningless. Conversely, other philosophers argue that discrimination should simply refer to wrongful disadvantageous treatment regardless of the social salience of the group, arguing that limiting the concept only to socially salient groups is arbitrary, as well as raising issues of determining which groups would count as socially salient. The issue of which groups should count has caused many political and social debates.<ref name="Altman 2020"/>

Based on realistic-conflict theory<ref>{{Cite book |title=Group conflict and co-operation |last=Sherif |first=M. |publisher=Routledge |year=1967 |location=London}}</ref> and social-identity theory,<ref>{{Cite book |title=The social psychology of intergroup relations |last1=Tajfel |first1=H. |last2=Turner |first2=J. C. |publisher=Brooks/Cole |year=1979 |editor-last=Austin |editor-first=W.G. |location=Monterey, CA |pages=33–47 |chapter=An integrative theory of intergroup conflict |editor-last2=Worchel |editor-first2=S.}}</ref> Rubin and Hewstone<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Rubin | first1 = M. | last2 = Hewstone | first2 = M.|display-authors=etal| year = 2004 | title = Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al | journal = Political Psychology | volume = 25 | issue = 6| pages = 823–844 | doi=10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00400.x | hdl = 1959.13/27347 | hdl-access = free }}</ref> have highlighted a distinction among three types of discrimination:
# ''Realistic competition'' is driven by self-interest and is aimed at obtaining material resources (e.g., food, territory, customers) for the in-group (e.g., favoring an in-group in order to obtain more resources for its members, including the self).
# ''Social competition'' is driven by the need for self-esteem and is aimed at achieving a positive social status for the in-group relative to comparable out-groups (e.g., favoring an in-group in order to make it better than an out-group).
# ''Consensual discrimination'' is driven by the need for accuracy<ref>{{Cite web |title=Prejudice & Discrimination Theories #2 |url=https://www.integratedsociopsychology.net/society/prejudice-discrimination/prejudice-discrimination-theories-2/ |access-date=2023-01-17 |website=Keith E Rice's Integrated SocioPsychology Blog & Pages |language=en-GB}}</ref> and reflects stable and legitimate intergroup status hierarchies (e.g., favoring a high-status in-group because it is high status).

===Labeling theory===

[[File:Zajęcia Akademii Edukacji Antydyskryminacyjnej w Centrum Żydowskim w Oświęcimiu.jpg|thumb|An anti-discrimination education workshop at the [[Auschwitz Jewish Center in Oświęcim|Auschwitz Jewish Center]], Poland, 2019]]
Discrimination, in [[labeling theory]], takes form as mental categorization of minorities and the use of [[stereotype]]. This theory describes difference as deviance from the norm, which results in internal devaluation and [[social stigma]]<ref>{{Cite book| last=Slattery| first=M. | year=2002 | title=Key Ideas in Sociology | publisher=Nelson Thornes| isbn=978-0-7487-6565-2 | pages=134–137}}</ref> that may be seen as discrimination. It is started by describing a "natural" social order. It is distinguished between the fundamental principle of fascism and social democracy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Skoll |first=Geoffrey R. |date=2010 |title=The Theory of Fear / Chapter 3 / States and Social Control |url=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9780230112636_3.pdf |journal=The Theory of Fear|doi=10.1057/9780230112636_3 }}</ref>{{Clarify|date=May 2013}} The [[Nazis]] in 1930s-era Germany and the pre-1990 [[Apartheid]] government of South Africa used racially discriminatory agendas for their political ends. This practice continues with some present day governments.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Adam|first1=Heribert|title=Anti-Semitism and Anti-Black Racism: Nazi Germany and Apartheid South Africa|journal=Telos|date=July 1, 1996|volume=1996|issue=108|pages=25–46|doi=10.3817/0696108025|s2cid=145360794}}</ref>

===Game theory===

Economist [[Yanis Varoufakis]] (2013) argues that "discrimination based on utterly arbitrary characteristics evolves quickly and systematically in the experimental laboratory", and that neither classical [[game theory]] nor [[neoclassical economics]] can explain this.<ref>{{cite book|chapter=Chapter 11: Evolving domination in the laboratory
|author=Yanis Varoufakis
|page=13
|year=2013
|title=Economic Indeterminacy: A personal encounter with the economists' peculiar nemesis
|series=Routledge Frontiers of Political Economy
|isbn=978-0-415-66849-1
|publisher=Routledge}}</ref>

In 2002, Varoufakis and Shaun Hargreaves-Heap ran an experiment where volunteers played a computer-mediated, multiround [[hawk-dove game]]. At the start of each session, each participant was assigned a color at random, either red or blue. At each round, each player learned the color assigned to his or her opponent, but nothing else about the opponent. Hargreaves-Heap and Varoufakis found that the players' behavior within a session frequently developed a discriminatory convention, giving a [[Nash equilibrium]] where players of one color (the "advantaged" color) [[pure strategy|consistently]] played the aggressive "hawk" strategy against players of the other, "disadvantaged" color, who played the acquiescent "dove" strategy against the advantaged color. Players of both colors used a [[mixed strategy]] when playing against players assigned the same color as their own. The experimenters then added a [[prisoners' dilemma|cooperation]] option to the game, and found that disadvantaged players usually cooperated with each other, while advantaged players usually did not. They state that while the equilibria reached in the original hawk-dove game are predicted by [[evolutionary game theory]], game theory does not explain the emergence of cooperation in the disadvantaged group. Citing earlier psychological work of [[Matthew Rabin]], they hypothesize that a norm of differing entitlements emerges across the two groups, and that this norm could define a "fairness" equilibrium within the disadvantaged group.<ref>{{citation|journal=[[The Economic Journal]]
|author1=Shaun Hargreaves-Heap
|author2=Yanis Varoufakis
|title=Some experimental evidence on the evolution of discrimination, co-operation and perceptions of fairness
|date=July 2002|volume=112
|issue=481
|pages=679–703|doi=10.1111/1468-0297.00735|s2cid=59133304
}}</ref>

==Effects on health==
{{excerpt|Psychological impact of discrimination on health}}
==See also==
{{Portal|Society}}
* [[Class discrimination]]
* [[Classicide]]
* [[Cultural appropriation]]
* [[Cultural assimilation]]
* [[Cultural genocide]]
* [[Dehumanization]]
* [[Dignity]]
* [[Discrimination against asexual people]]
* [[Discrimination against atheists]]
* [[Discrimination against drug addicts]]
* [[Discrimination against members of the armed forces in the United Kingdom]]
* [[Discrimination against people with HIV/AIDS]]
* [[Discrimination based on skin color]]
* [[Discrimination of excellence]]
* [[Economic discrimination]]
* [[Equal opportunity]]
* [[Equality before the law|Equal rights]]
* [[Normalization of antisemitism]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}
<!--See Richey, Warren. "Affirmative Action's Evolution." The CS Monitor. Staff Writer of the Christian Science Montior, 2003. May 3, 2007 <http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0328/p01s01-usju.html>. -->

==External links==
{{Commonscat|Prejudice and discrimination}}
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Wiktionary}}
{{Library resources box|by=no|onlinebooks=no|about=yes|wikititle=discrimination}}
* [http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/employment_discrimination Employment discrimination –Topics.law.cornell.edu]
* Legal definitions
** [https://web.archive.org/web/20020312030853/http://www.hreoc.gov.au/legal/index.html Australia]
** [https://web.archive.org/web/20061212181501/http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/legislation_policies/human_rights_act-en.asp Canada]
** [http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/ch2.html Russia]
** [http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html US]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080214123639/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/dossier/dossier_23.htm Discrimination Laws in Europe]
* [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1594425 Behavioral Biology and Racism]

{{Discrimination}}
{{Abuse}}
{{Types of crime}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Discrimination| ]]
[[Category:Barriers to critical thinking]]
[[Category:Social justice]]
[[Category:Concepts in social philosophy]]
[[Category:Abuse]]