Tachyony: Imported page

2022-02-08T17:47:20Z

Imported page

New page

<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Failed DYK nominations from January 2022]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. '''Please do not modify this page.''' Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''

The result was: '''withdrawn by nominator''', closed by [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 11:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC) 
{{DYK conditions}}
{{DYK header|Lesley Johnson}}
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Lesley Johnson|Lesley Johnson}}
* ... that in 2004 '''[[Lesley Johnson]]''' published "Sentenced to Everyday Life: Feminism and the Housewife" and she became a deputy vice chancellor at [[Griffith University]]? Source: [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KTrWfjmNgtIC&newbks=0&hl=en&source=newbks_fb&redir_esc=y book here, then see article]
* '''alt1'''... that '''[[Lesley Johnson]]''', who is twice an Australian professor emeritus, is an expert on [[feminism]] and [[Housewife|housewifery]]?
** ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Healy (theologian)]]
** ''Comment'': If you see an error or you can make an improvement then please be bold and make the edit. Sad no image ... anyone got one?
Created by [[User:Oronsay|Oronsay]] ([[User talk:Oronsay|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) at 10:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC).
* I will review this as per QPQ requirements. [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 13:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
** So, the hook is sourced to Google Books. I have sought assistance at [[WT:RS]] if this falls under [[WP:RS]]. We'll do a full review once they have an advice on this. [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 21:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
***Can a hook have two sources? The bio has a reference to a review of the book and, separately, a ref for her position at Griffith University?--[[User:Oronsay|Oronsay]] ([[User talk:Oronsay|talk]]) 04:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
**** A hook can have several refs "The Antipodean, outstanding, Wikipedian who..." might require three. [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 08:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

{{DYK checklist

|newness = y
|length = y
|eligibilityother =
|sourced = y
|neutral = y
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother =
|hookcited = y
|hookinterest = y
|hookother =
|picfree = NA
|picused =
|picclear =
|qpq = y
|status = y
|comments = Plagiarism: This originally was found to be "Violation Possible" but upon closer inspection the "violations" were proper names (which were rather long) and lengthy quote on why she was appointed Member of the Order of Australia. Hookinterest: To be honest it is uninteresting, but I've read through the article and cannot come up with a more interesting one.
|sign = [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 15:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
}}
:[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The hook needs to be interesting to be promoted. You just said it wasn't. I agree with you also. She published a book, like so many people have done, and that book doesn't have an article. She also has a career, like so many people have, without saying anything interesting about it. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 00:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
:{{u|Howard the Duck}} [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 00:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
::If that's the case, we'd need an interesting hook for this to go. [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 05:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
:::I'm drawing a blank as well—[[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]], got anything? Ping Kavyansh.Singh and EEng if not. [[User:Theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theleekycauldron|contribs]]) (she/[[Singular they|they]]) 09:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
::::Alt1 might rise a bit above the "not interesting" judgement. {{ping|oronsay}} may have a view. If passed then this is a good candidate for [[Women's History Month]]. [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 09:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
::::Alt1 is just as uninteresting as Alt0. [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 12:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::I'm drawing a blank on a possible hook at the moment. I would suggest checking if there's anything known about her personal life and see if there could be something usable there. Otherwise I'd recommend marking the nomination for closure for not having anything hook-worthy. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|contributions]]) 09:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly>

Template:Did you know nominations/Lesley Johnson - Revision history

Tachyony: Imported page