Tachyony: Imported page

2021-12-19T16:18:17Z

Imported page

New page

{|
| style="background:#e6f2ff; border:1px solid #a3b1bf; padding:1em; vertical-align:top; width:70%;"|
Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia

[[File:Cscr-candidate.png|left|50px|alt=This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.]]
Welcome to '''featured list candidates'''! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be [[Wikipedia:Featured lists|featured lists]] (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the [[Wikipedia:Featured list criteria|featured list criteria]].

Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at [[Wikipedia:Peer review|peer review]]. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org significant contributors to the list] should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and at peer review at the same time. Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. Please do not split featured list candidate pages into subsections using header code (if necessary, use bolded headings).

The featured list director, [[User:Giants2008|Giants2008]], or his delegates, [[User:PresN|PresN]] and [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]], determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will last at least ten days (though most last a month or longer) and may be lengthened where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. For a nomination to be [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log#Full current month log|promoted]] to FL status, [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] must be reached that it meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log|archived]] if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:
* actionable objections have not been resolved; or
* consensus for promotion has not been reached; or
* insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met.

It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve ''critical'' comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.

After a reasonable time has passed, the director or delegates will decide when a nomination is ready to be closed. A [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Instructions|bot will update the list talk page]] after the list is promoted or the nomination archived; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the <code><nowiki>{{FLC}}</nowiki></code> template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the <code><nowiki>{{Article history}}</nowiki></code> template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.

{{purge|''Purge the cache to refresh this page''}} – [[#toc|Table of contents]] – [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Instructions|Closing instructions]] – [[tools:~dispenser/summary/Featured list candidates|Checklinks]] – [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py?headlinks=Wikipedia:Featured list candidates|Dablinks]] – [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/rdcheck.py?headlinks=Wikipedia:Featured list candidates|Check redirects]]

| style="background:#E6F2FF; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; padding:1em; vertical-align:top;" |
{{shortcut|WP:FLC}}
{{FLpages}}
|-
| colspan="2" style="background:#f5faff; border:1px solid #a3b1bf; padding:1em;"|
Nomination procedure
{{Template:Featured article tools/without list}}
# Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the [[Wikipedia:Featured list criteria|FL criteria]] and that any [[WP:PR|peer reviews]] are closed and archived.
# Place <code><nowiki>{{subst:FLC}}</nowiki></code> on the talk page of the nominated list.

# From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on [[WT:FLC|the FLC talk page]] for assistance.
# Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> and save the page.
# Finally, place <code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber}}</nowiki></code> at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary.

Supporting and objecting

Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

* To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the ''whole'' FLC page).
* To support a nomination, write <code><nowiki>* '''Support'''</nowiki></code>, '''followed''' by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this.
* To oppose a nomination, write <code><nowiki>* '''Object'''</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>* '''Oppose'''</nowiki></code>, '''followed''' by your reason(s). Each objection must provide '''a specific rationale that can be addressed'''. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. References on style and grammar do not always agree; if a contributor cites support for a certain style in a standard reference work or other authoritative source, reviewers should consider accepting it. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed. To withdraw the objection, strike it out (with <code><nowiki><s> ... </s></nowiki></code>), rather than removing it. Alternatively, reviewers may hide lengthy, resolved commentary in a cap template with a signature in the header. This method should be used only when necessary, because it can cause the FLC archives to exceed [[Wikipedia:Template limits|template limits]].
* If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so after the reviewer's signature, rather than striking out or splitting up the reviewer's text. Per [[WP:TALK|talk page guidelines]], nominators should not cap, alter, strike, break up or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page, with a diff to the reviewer's talk page showing the request to reconsider.
* Graphics (such as {{tl|done}} and {{tl|not done}}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time.
* To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write <nowiki>* '''Comment'''</nowiki> followed by your advice.
|}

Template:FLC-instructions - Revision history

Tachyony: Imported page