<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.tachyony.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Wikipedia%3AOne_hundred_words</id>
	<title>Wikipedia:One hundred words - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.tachyony.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Wikipedia%3AOne_hundred_words"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.tachyony.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:One_hundred_words&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-15T22:41:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.5</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.tachyony.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:One_hundred_words&amp;diff=5907&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Tachyony: Imported page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.tachyony.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:One_hundred_words&amp;diff=5907&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2022-01-18T00:39:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Essay|WP:100W|WP:100WORDS}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{nutshell|Sources with at least 100 words of coverage of a topic generally constitute [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] of that topic.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emoji u1f4af.svg|thumb|right|200px|One hundred words of prose could be taken to be a notability indicator.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the present time, the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]] provides inadequate guidance as to what level of coverage is significant. The example presently offered (a large book) should obviously not be taken as a minimum standard for significant coverage, as most topics that meet this criterion have not had entire books written about them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is therefore suggested that one hundred non-repetitious words, written in more or less continuous prose,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Publications such as biographical dictionaries are sometimes written in a highly abbreviated language that conveys more information in fewer words. If a source is written in language that looks more like a set of notes than complete sentences, the figures offered in this essay will be too high.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in one or more sources, is clearly significant coverage in all cases. This figure is, however, only suggested as a maximum. Fifty such words would likely be significant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[These numbers were inspired by the length of articles in the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;New Discovery Encyclopedia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Rainbow Books, 1990), though they are not averages or any other kind of statistic. They roughly correspond with the length of a decent sized paragraph. They also happen to be round numbers.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage]] (a close reading of existing guidance)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:What is significant coverage?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia Essays}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikipedia essays about notability]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tachyony</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>