Guerrilla warfare: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Georgethedragonslayer
 
imported>OSINTsparrow
m Punctuation edits.
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Form of irregular warfare}}
{{Short description|Warfare by small groups against regular forces}}
{{Distinguish |Gorilla}}
{{other uses|Guerrilla (disambiguation)|Guerrilla Warfare (disambiguation)}}
{{Redirect-multi|2|Guerrilla|Guerrilla War|other uses|Guerrilla (disambiguation)|and|Guerrilla Warfare (disambiguation)}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{Multiple issues|{{Original research|date=October 2024}}
{{Original research|date=October 2024}}
{{More footnotes|date=September 2010}}
{{More footnotes|date=September 2010}}
}}
}}
[[File:As Guerrilhas na Guerra Peninsular (Roque Gameiro, Quadros da História de Portugal, 1917).png|thumb|upright=1.3|''Guerrilla warfare during the [[Peninsular War]]'', by [[Alfredo Roque Gameiro|Roque Gameiro]], depicting a Portuguese guerrilla ambush against French forces]]
[[File:As Guerrilhas na Guerra Peninsular (Roque Gameiro, Quadros da História de Portugal, 1917).png|thumb|upright=1.3|''Guerrilla warfare during the [[Peninsular War]]'', by [[Alfredo Roque Gameiro|Roque Gameiro]], depicting a Portuguese guerrilla ambush against French forces]]
{{History of war}}
{{History of war}}
'''Guerrilla warfare''' is a type of [[unconventional warfare]] in which small groups of [[irregular military]], such as rebels, [[Partisan (military)|partisan]]s, [[paramilitary]] personnel or armed [[civilian]]s, which may include [[Children in the military|recruited children]], use [[ambush]]es, [[sabotage]], [[terrorism]], [[Raid (military)|raids]], [[petty warfare]] or [[hit-and-run tactics]] in a [[rebellion]], in a [[violence|violent conflict]], in a [[war]] or in a [[civil war]] to fight against regular [[military]], [[police]] or rival [[insurgency|insurgent]] forces.{{sfn|Asprey|2023}}
'''Guerrilla warfare''' is a type of [[unconventional warfare]] in which small groups of [[irregular military]], such as rebels, [[Partisan (military)|partisan]]s, [[paramilitary]] personnel or armed [[civilian]]s, which may include [[children in the military]], use [[ambush]]es, [[sabotage]], [[terrorism]], [[Raid (military)|raids]], [[petty warfare]] or [[hit-and-run tactics]] in a [[rebellion]], in a [[violence|violent conflict]], in a [[war]] or in a [[civil war]] to fight against regular [[military]], [[police]] or rival [[insurgency|insurgent]] forces.{{sfn|Asprey|2023}}


Although the term "guerrilla warfare" was coined in the context of the [[Peninsular War]] in the 19th century,{{sfn|OED|2023}} the tactical methods of guerrilla warfare have long been in use. In the 6th century [[Anno Domini|BC]], [[Sun Tzu]] proposed the use of guerrilla-style tactics in ''[[The Art of War]]''.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9110197/guerrilla-warfare Encyclopædia Britannica, Guerrilla warfare]</ref> The 3rd century BC Roman general [[Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus]] is also credited with inventing many of the tactics of guerrilla warfare through what is today called the [[Fabian strategy]], and in China [[Peng Yue]] is also often regarded as the inventor of guerrilla warfare. Guerrilla warfare has been used by various factions throughout history and is particularly associated with revolutionary movements and popular resistance against invading or occupying armies.
Although the term "guerrilla warfare" was coined in the context of the [[Peninsular War]] in the 19th century,{{sfn|OED|2023}} the tactical methods of guerrilla warfare have long been in use. In the 6th century [[Anno Domini|BC]], [[Sun Tzu]] proposed the use of guerrilla-style tactics in ''[[The Art of War]]''.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9110197/guerrilla-warfare Encyclopædia Britannica, Guerrilla warfare]</ref> The 3rd century BC Roman general [[Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus]] is also credited with inventing many of the tactics of guerrilla warfare through what is today called the [[Fabian strategy]], and in China [[Peng Yue]] is also often regarded as the inventor of guerrilla warfare. Guerrilla warfare has been used by various factions throughout history and is particularly associated with revolutionary movements and popular resistance against invading or occupying armies.


[[Strategy and tactics of guerrilla warfare|Guerrilla tactics]] focus on avoiding head-on confrontations with enemy armies, typically due to inferior arms or forces, and instead engage in limited skirmishes with the goal of exhausting adversaries and forcing them to withdraw (see also [[attrition warfare]]). Organized guerrilla groups often depend on the support of either the local population or foreign backers who sympathize with the guerrilla group's efforts.
[[Strategy and tactics of guerrilla warfare|Guerrilla tactics]] focus on avoiding head-on confrontations with enemy armies, typically due to inferior arms or forces, and instead engage in limited skirmishes with the goal of exhausting adversaries and forcing them to withdraw (see also [[attrition warfare]]). Organized guerrilla groups often depend on the support of either the local population or foreign backers who sympathize with the guerrilla group's efforts.<ref>''Guerrilla Warfare'' (1987), John Pimlott (Author), {{ISBN|0861242254}}</ref>


== Etymology ==
== Etymology ==
[[File:6-de-junio-1808.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Spanish guerrilla resistance to the Napoleonic French invasion of Spain at the [[Battle of Valdepeñas]]]]
The Spanish word {{lang|es|guerrilla}} is the diminutive form of {{lang|es|guerra}} ("war"); hence, "little war". The term became popular during the early-19th century [[Peninsular War]], when, after the defeat of their regular armies, [[Guerrilla warfare in the Peninsular War|the Spanish and Portuguese people successfully rose]] against the [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleonic]] [[Grande Armée|troops]] and defeated a highly superior army using the guerrilla strategy in combination with a [[scorched earth policy]] and [[people's war]] (see also [[attrition warfare against Napoleon]]). In correct [[Spanish language|Spanish]] usage, a person who is a member of a {{lang|es|guerrilla}} unit is a {{lang|es|guerrillero}} ({{IPA|es|geriˈʎeɾo|}}) if male, or a {{lang|es|guerrillera}} ([[Help:IPA/Spanish|[geriˈʎeɾa]]]) if female. [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Arthur Wellesley]] adopted the term "guerrilla" into [[English language|English]] from Spanish usage in 1809,{{sfn|OED|2023}} to refer to the individual ''fighters'' (e.g., "I have recommended to set the Guerrillas to work"), and also (as in Spanish) to denote ''a group or band'' of such fighters. However, in most languages ''guerrilla'' still denotes a specific style of warfare. The use of the [[diminutive]] evokes the differences in number, scale, and scope between the guerrilla army and the formal, professional army of the state.{{sfn|etymonline|2023}}
The Spanish word {{lang|es|guerrilla}} is the diminutive form of {{lang|es|guerra}} ("war"); hence, "little war". The term became popular during the early-19th century [[Peninsular War]], when, after the defeat of their regular armies, [[Guerrilla warfare in the Peninsular War|the Spanish and Portuguese people successfully rose]] against the [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleonic]] [[Grande Armée|troops]] and defeated a highly superior army using the guerrilla strategy in combination with a [[scorched earth policy]] and [[people's war]] (see also [[attrition warfare against Napoleon]]). In correct [[Spanish language|Spanish]] usage, a person who is a member of a {{lang|es|guerrilla}} unit is a {{lang|es|guerrillero}} ({{IPA|es|geriˈʎeɾo|}}) if male, or a {{lang|es|guerrillera}} ([[Help:IPA/Spanish|[geriˈʎeɾa]]]) if female. [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Arthur Wellesley]] adopted the term "guerrilla" into [[English language|English]] from Spanish usage in 1809,{{sfn|OED|2023}} to refer to the individual ''fighters'' (e.g., "I have recommended to set the Guerrillas to work"), and also (as in Spanish) to denote ''a group or band'' of such fighters. However, in most languages ''guerrilla'' still denotes a specific style of warfare. The use of the [[diminutive]] evokes the differences in number, scale, and scope between the guerrilla army and the formal, professional army of the state.{{sfn|etymonline|2023}}


==History==
==History==
{{Main|History of guerrilla warfare}}
{{Main|History of guerrilla warfare}}
[[File:Elas vo Ksanti.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Guerrillas of the [[Greek People's Liberation Army]] in Xanthi during [[World War II]]]]
[[File:Elas vo Ksanti.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Guerrillas of the [[Greek People's Liberation Army]] in Xanthi during [[World War II]]]]
[[File:Sov partizans.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|[[Soviet partisans]] on the road in [[Nazi-occupied Belarus]] during the 1944 counter-offensive]]
Prehistoric tribal warriors presumably employed guerrilla-style tactics against enemy tribes:
Prehistoric tribal warriors presumably employed guerrilla-style tactics against enemy tribes:
{{blockquote|Primitive (and guerrilla) warfare consists of war stripped to its essentials: the murder of enemies; the theft or destruction of their sustenance, wealth, and essential resources; and the inducement in them of insecurity and terror. It conducts the basic business of war without recourse to ponderous formations or equipment, complicated maneuvers, strict chains of command, calculated strategies, timetables, or other civilized embellishments.{{sfn|Keeley|1997|p=75}}}}
{{blockquote|Primitive (and guerrilla) warfare consists of war stripped to its essentials: the murder of enemies; the theft or destruction of their sustenance, wealth, and essential resources; and the inducement in them of insecurity and terror. It conducts the basic business of war without recourse to ponderous formations or equipment, complicated maneuvers, strict chains of command, calculated strategies, timetables, or other civilized embellishments.{{sfn|Keeley|1997|p=75}}}}
Line 27: Line 25:
Evidence of [[conventional warfare]], on the other hand, did not emerge until 3100 BC in Egypt and Mesopotamia. The Chinese general and strategist [[Sun Tzu]], in his ''[[The Art of War]]'' (6th century BC), became one of the earliest to propose the use of guerrilla warfare.{{sfn|Leonard|1989|p=728}} This inspired developments in modern guerrilla warfare.{{sfn|Snyder|1999|p=46}}
Evidence of [[conventional warfare]], on the other hand, did not emerge until 3100 BC in Egypt and Mesopotamia. The Chinese general and strategist [[Sun Tzu]], in his ''[[The Art of War]]'' (6th century BC), became one of the earliest to propose the use of guerrilla warfare.{{sfn|Leonard|1989|p=728}} This inspired developments in modern guerrilla warfare.{{sfn|Snyder|1999|p=46}}


In the 3rd century BC, [[Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus]], used elements of guerrilla warfare, such as the evasion of battle, the attempt to wear down the enemy, to attack small detachments in an ambush{{sfn|Laqueur|1977|p=7}} and devised the [[Fabian strategy]], which the [[Roman Republic]] used to great effect against [[Hannibal]]'s army, see also ''His Excellency : George Washington'': the Fabian choice.{{sfn|Ellis|2005|pp=99–102}} The Roman general [[Quintus Sertorius]] is also noted for his skillful use of guerrilla warfare during [[Sertorian War|his revolt]] against the [[Roman Senate]]. In China, Han dynasty general [[Peng Yue]] is often regarded as the inventor of guerrilla warfare due to his use of irregular warfare in the [[Chu–Han Contention|Chu-Han contention]] to attack Chu convoys and supplies.<ref>{{Cite web |title=彭越,一个历史量身打造的游击战术的鼻祖 |url=https://www.sohu.com/a/367455192_120507727 |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=www.sohu.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=彭越游击战:刘邦反楚的重要推手 |url=https://m.szonline.net/think/contents/20240218/202402735054.html |access-date=29 October 2024}}</ref>
In the 3rd century BC, [[Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus]], called ''Cunctator'' ("delayer"), used elements of guerrilla warfare, such as the evasion of battle, the attempt to wear down the enemy, to attack small detachments in an ambush{{sfn|Laqueur|1977|p=7}} and devised the [[Fabian strategy]], which the [[Roman Republic]] used to great effect against [[Hannibal]]'s army, see also ''His Excellency : George Washington'': the Fabian choice.{{sfn|Ellis|2005|pp=99–102}} The Roman general [[Quintus Sertorius]] is also noted for his skillful use of guerrilla warfare during [[Sertorian War|his revolt]] against the [[Roman Senate]]. In China, Han dynasty general [[Peng Yue]] is often regarded as the inventor of guerrilla warfare due to his use of irregular warfare in the [[Chu–Han Contention|Chu-Han contention]] to attack Chu convoys and supplies.<ref>{{Cite web |title=彭越,一个历史量身打造的游击战术的鼻祖 |url=https://www.sohu.com/a/367455192_120507727 |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=www.sohu.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=彭越游击战:刘邦反楚的重要推手 |url=https://m.szonline.net/think/contents/20240218/202402735054.html |access-date=29 October 2024}}</ref>


In the [[Byzantine Empire]], guerrilla warfare was frequently practiced between the eighth through tenth centuries along the eastern frontier with the Umayyad and then Abbasid caliphates. Tactics involved a heavy emphasis on reconnaissance and intelligence, shadowing the enemy, evacuating threatened population centres, and attacking when the enemy dispersed to raid.{{sfn|McMahon|2016|pages=22–33}} In the later tenth century this form of warfare was codified in a military manual known by its later Latin name as ''[[De velitatione bellica]]'' ('On Skirmishing') so it would not be forgotten in the future.{{sfn|Dennis|1985|p=147}}
In the [[Byzantine Empire]], guerrilla warfare was frequently practiced between the eighth through tenth centuries along the eastern frontier with the Umayyad and then Abbasid caliphates. Tactics involved a heavy emphasis on reconnaissance and intelligence, shadowing the enemy, evacuating threatened population centres, and attacking when the enemy dispersed to raid.{{sfn|McMahon|2016|pages=22–33}} In the later tenth century this form of warfare was codified in a military manual known by its later Latin name as ''[[De velitatione bellica]]'' ('On Skirmishing') so it would not be forgotten in the future.{{sfn|Dennis|1985|p=147}}


The Normans often made many forays into Wales, where the Welsh used the mountainous region, which the Normans were unfamiliar with, to spring surprise attacks upon them.{{sfn|Hooper|Bennett|1996|pp=68-}}
The Normans often made many forays into Wales, where the Welsh used the mountainous region, which the Normans were unfamiliar with, to spring surprise attacks upon them.{{sfn|Hooper|Bennett|1996|pp=68–}}
 
[[Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba]] successfully employed guerrilla warfare during the [[Italian Wars]], where his Italian lieutenant and successor [[Prospero Colonna]] was called ''Cuntatore'' after Quintus Fabius Maximus due to their similar tactics. Guerrilla warfare eventually became one of the specialties of the Spanish ''[[tercio]]s'', including techniques like the [[camisado]].<ref>Baquer, M. A. (2006). ''La escuela Hispano-Italiana de Estrategia. Guerra y sociedad en la monarquía hispánica''. Vol. 1, 2006, ISBN 84-8483-235-X, págs. 367-380</ref>


Since [[the Enlightenment]], ideologies such as [[nationalism]], [[liberalism]], [[socialism]], and [[religious fundamentalism]] have played an important role in shaping insurgencies and guerrilla warfare.{{sfn|Hanhimäki|Blumenau|Rapaport|2013|pp=46–73}}
Since [[the Enlightenment]], ideologies such as [[nationalism]], [[liberalism]], [[socialism]], and [[religious fundamentalism]] have played an important role in shaping insurgencies and guerrilla warfare.{{sfn|Hanhimäki|Blumenau|Rapaport|2013|pp=46–73}}
Line 37: Line 37:
In the 17th century, [[Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj]], founder of the [[Maratha Kingdom]], pioneered the ''Shiva sutra'' or ''[[Ganimi Kava]]'' (Guerrilla Tactics) to defeat the many times larger and more powerful armies of the [[Mughal Empire]].{{sfn|Duff|2014}}
In the 17th century, [[Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj]], founder of the [[Maratha Kingdom]], pioneered the ''Shiva sutra'' or ''[[Ganimi Kava]]'' (Guerrilla Tactics) to defeat the many times larger and more powerful armies of the [[Mughal Empire]].{{sfn|Duff|2014}}


The Second Pazhassi War (1800-1805) was launched by Kerala Varma [[Pazhassi Raja]] against [[Company rule in India|Company rule]] in Wayanad and Malabar. Renowned for his expertise in guerrilla warfare, he strategically used the dense forests and rugged terrain to launch surprise attacks on the East India Company. He was supported by the Kurichiya and Kuruma tribes, skilled hunters and archers who played a crucial role in the war. Recently, a cave discovered in Cherambadi, Nilgiris, is believed to have been a hideout used by Pazhassi Raja during the conflict. The conflict arose after the [[East India Company]] (EIC) imposed heavy taxes through Raja’s uncle, Vira Varma, violating a prior agreement. In 1796, the EIC attempted to arrest Pazhassi Raja, but he evaded capture and intensified his attacks. After initial setbacks, Raja signed a peace treaty with the British in 1797, but hostilities resumed in 1800 over Wayanad. The prolonged conflict ended when Pazhassi Raja was ambushed and killed on November 30, 1805, at Mavila Thodu near the Kerala-Karnataka border. “Kerala Simham” (Lion of Kerala), today, he is remembered as one of India’s earliest freedom fighters.{{fact|date=July 2025}}
During the [[Dominican Restoration War]] between 1863 and 1865, Spanish soldiers were deprived of supplies and weapons as insurgents intercepted mule [[Train (military)|supply trains]], captured arms depots containing rifles, cannons, and ammunition, and burned towns they could not hold to deny the Spanish access to supplies and shelter.<ref>{{cite web |title=Victory, Stalemate and Defeat During the Spanish Caribbean Insurgencies of 1868–1878 |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1012792.pdf|pages=27, 29}}</ref>


[[File:Fortaleza San Luis - Monumento a los Héroes de la Restauración.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|Siege of the [[Fortaleza San Luis]] by the Dominican rebels by Melanio Guzmán]]
The Riffian [[Berbers|Berber]] military leader [[Abd el-Krim]] ({{circa | 1883}} – 1963) and his father{{sfn|islamicus|2023}} unified the Berber tribes under their control and took up arms against the Spanish and French occupiers during the [[Rif War]] in 1920. For the first time in history, [[tunnel warfare]] was used alongside modern guerrilla tactics, which caused considerable damage to both the colonial armies in Morocco.{{sfn|Boot|2013|pp=10–11, 55}}
The [[Dominican Restoration War]] was a guerrilla war between 1863 and 1865 in the [[Dominican Republic]] between nationalists and [[Spain]], the latter of which [[Spanish occupation of the Dominican Republic|had recolonized the country]] 17 years after its independence. The war resulted in the withdrawal of Spanish forces and the establishment of a second republic in the Dominican Republic.{{sfn|Pons|1998}}


[[File:Hogan's Flying Column.gif|thumb|upright=1.3|[[Seán Hogan]]'s [[flying column]] of the IRA's [[3rd Tipperary Brigade]], during the [[Irish War of Independence]]]]
In the early 20th century [[Michael Collins (Irish leader)|Michael Collins]] and [[Tom Barry (Irish republican)|Tom Barry]] both developed many tactical features of guerrilla warfare during [[Irish War of Independence|the guerrilla phase of the 1919–1921 Irish War of Independence]]. Collins developed mainly urban guerrilla warfare tactics in [[Dublin|Dublin City]] (the Irish capital). Operations in which small [[Irish Republican Army (1919–1922)|Irish Republican Army]] (IRA) units (3 to 6 guerrillas) quickly attacked a target and then disappeared into civilian crowds.{{sfn|Ferriter|2020}}{{sfn|historyireland|2003}} In [[County Cork]], Tom Barry was the commander of the IRA [[3rd Cork Brigade|West Cork brigade]]. Fighting in west Cork was rural, and the IRA fought in much larger units than their comrades in urban areas. These units, called "[[flying column]]s",{{sfn|Chisholm|1911|p=585}} engaged British forces in large battles, usually for between 10–30 minutes.
The Moroccan military leader [[Abd el-Krim]] ({{circa | 1883}} – 1963) and his father{{sfn|islamicus|2023}} unified the Moroccan tribes under their control and took up arms against the Spanish and French occupiers during the [[Rif War]] in 1920. For the first time in history, [[tunnel warfare]] was used alongside modern guerrilla tactics, which caused considerable damage to both the colonial armies in Morocco.{{sfn|Boot|2013|pp=10–11, 55}}


In the early 20th century [[Michael Collins (Irish leader)|Michael Collins]] and [[Tom Barry (Irish republican)|Tom Barry]] both developed many tactical features of guerrilla warfare during [[Irish War of Independence|the guerrilla phase of the 1919–1921 Irish War of Independence]]. Collins developed mainly urban guerrilla warfare tactics in [[Dublin| Dublin City]] (the Irish capital). Operations in which small [[Irish Republican Army (1919–1922)|Irish Republican Army]] (IRA) units (3 to 6 guerrillas) quickly attacked a target and then disappeared into civilian crowds frustrated the British enemy. The best example of this occurred on [[Bloody Sunday (1920)|Bloody Sunday]] (21 November 1920), when Collins's assassination unit, known as [[The Squad (Irish Republican Army unit)|"The Squad"]], wiped out a group of British intelligence agents ("the [[Cairo Gang]]") early in the morning (14 were killed, six were wounded) – some regular officers were also killed in the purge. That afternoon, the [[Black and Tans|Royal Irish Constabulary]] force consisting of both regular RIC personnel and the [[Auxiliary Division]] took revenge, shooting into a crowd at a football match in [[Croke Park]], killing fourteen civilians and injuring 60 others.{{sfn|Ferriter|2020}}{{sfn|historyireland|2003}}
The [[Algerian revolution|Algerian Revolution]] of 1954 started with a handful of Algerian guerrillas. Primitively armed, the guerrillas fought the French for over eight years. This remains a prototype for modern insurgency and counterinsurgency, terrorism, torture, and asymmetric warfare prevalent throughout the world today.{{sfn|Horne|2022}} In [[South Africa]], [[African National Congress]] (ANC) members studied the Algerian War, prior to the release and apotheosis of [[Nelson Mandela]];{{sfn|Drew|2015|pp=22–43}} in their [[intifada]] against Israel, [[Palestinian fedayeen|Palestinian fighters]] have sought to emulate it.{{sfn|Chamberlin|2015}} Additionally, the tactics of [[Al-Qaeda]] closely resemble those of the Algerians.{{sfn|Boeke|2019}}


In West [[County Cork]], Tom Barry was the commander of the IRA [[3rd Cork Brigade|West Cork brigade]]. Fighting in west Cork was rural, and the IRA fought in much larger units than their fellows in urban areas. These units, called "[[flying column]]s",{{sfn|Chisholm|1911|p=585}} engaged British forces in large battles, usually for between 10 – 30 minutes. The [[Kilmichael Ambush]] in November 1920 and the [[Crossbarry Ambush]] in March 1921 are the most famous examples of Barry's flying columns causing large casualties to enemy forces.
==Theoretical works==
[[File:Women guerrilla.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Lakhdari, Drif, Bouhired and Bouali. Female Algerian guerrillas of the [[Algerian War|Algerian War of Independence]], {{circa|1956}}.]]
The growth of guerrilla warfare was inspired in part by theoretical works on guerrilla warfare, starting with the ''Manual de Guerra de Guerrillas'' by [[Matías Ramón Mella]] written in the 19th century:{{blockquote|...our troops should...fight while protected by the terrain...using small, mobile guerrilla units to exhaust the enemy...denying them rest so that they only control the terrain under their feet.{{sfn|Kruijt|Tristán|Álvarez|2019}}}}Mao Zedong's ''[[On Guerrilla Warfare]]'',{{sfn|Mao|1989}} [[Che Guevara]]'s [[Guerrilla Warfare (book)|''Guerrilla Warfare'']],{{sfn|Guevara|2006}} and Lenin's ''Guerrilla warfare''{{sfn|Lenin|1906}} were all written after the successful revolutions carried out by them in China, Cuba and Russia, respectively. Those texts characterized the tactic of guerrilla warfare as, according to [[Che Guevara]]'s text, being "used by the side which is supported by a majority but which possesses a much smaller number of arms for use in defense against oppression".{{sfn|Guevara|2006|p=16}}
The [[Algerian revolution|Algerian Revolution]] of 1954 started with a handful of Algerian guerrillas. Primitively armed, the guerrillas fought the French for over eight years. This remains a prototype for modern insurgency and counterinsurgency, terrorism, torture, and asymmetric warfare prevalent throughout the world today.{{sfn|Horne|2022}} In [[South Africa]], [[African National Congress]] (ANC) members studied the Algerian War, prior to the release and apotheosis of [[Nelson Mandela]];{{sfn|Drew|2015|pp=22-43}} in their [[intifada]] against Israel, [[Palestinian fedayeen|Palestinian fighters]] have sought to emulate it.{{sfn|Chamberlin|2015}} Additionally, the tactics of [[Al-Qaeda]] closely resemble those of the Algerians.{{sfn|Boeke|2019}}


The Mukti Bahini (Bengali: মুক্তিবাহিনী, translates as "freedom fighters", or liberation army), also known as the Bangladesh Forces, was the guerrilla resistance movement consisting of the Bangladeshi military, paramilitary and civilians during the [[Bangladesh Liberation War]] that transformed [[East Pakistan]] into Bangladesh in 1971. An earlier name [[Mukti Bahini|Mukti Fauj]] was also used.
=== Writings of T. E. Lawrence ===
[[T. E. Lawrence]], best known as "Lawrence of Arabia", introduced a theory of guerrilla warfare tactics in an article he wrote for the Encyclopædia Britannica published in 1938. In that article, he compared guerrilla fighters to a gas. The fighters disperse in the area of operations more or less randomly. They or their cells occupy a very small intrinsic space in that area, just as gas molecules occupy a very small intrinsic space in a container. The fighters may coalesce into groups for tactical purposes, but their general state is dispersed. They are extremely difficult to "defeat" because they cannot be brought to battle in significant numbers.


==Theoretical works==
Lawrence wrote down some of his theories while ill and unable to fight the Turks in his book ''[[Seven Pillars of Wisdom]]''. There, he reviews [[Carl von Clausewitz|von Clausewitz]] and other theorists of war, and finds their writings inapplicable to his situation. The Arabs could not defeat the Turks in pitched battle since they were individualistic warriors not disciplined soldiers used to fight in large formations.
The growth of guerrilla warfare was inspired in part by theoretical works on guerrilla warfare, starting with the ''Manual de Guerra de Guerrillas'' by [[Matías Ramón Mella]] written in the 19th century:{{blockquote|...our troops should...fight while protected by the terrain...using small, mobile guerrilla units to exhaust the enemy...denying them rest so that they only control the terrain under their feet.{{sfn|Kruijt|Tristán|Álvarez|2019}}}}
=== Maoist thought ===
[[File:Simple_guerrilla_organization.svg|right|thumb|250x250px|Simplified guerrilla warfare organization]]
[[File:Dautranh.jpg|right|thumb|303x303px|The classic "3-phase" Maoist model as adapted by North Vietnam's Ho Chi Minh and Võ Nguyên Giáp.<ref>Võ Nguyên Giáp, ''Big Victory, Great Task'', Pall Mall Press, London (1968)</ref>]]
[[Mao Zedong]] argued that guerrilla [[insurgency]], or what he referred to as a "war of revolutionary nature," can be conceived of as part of a [[Continuum (theory)|continuum]].<ref>On Guerrilla Warfare, by Mao Zedong, 1937, [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/1937/guerrilla-warfare/index.htm See the text of Mao's work online] at www.marxists.org</ref> On the low end are small-scale raids, ambushes and attacks. The upper end is composed of a fully integrated political-military strategy, comprising both large and small units, engaging in constantly shifting mobile warfare, both on the low-end "guerrilla" scale, and that of large, mobile formations with modern arms.


More recently, Mao Zedong's ''[[On Guerrilla Warfare]]'',{{sfn|Mao|1989}} [[Che Guevara]]'s [[Guerrilla Warfare (book)|''Guerrilla Warfare'']],{{sfn|Guevara|2006}} and Lenin's ''Guerrilla warfare'',{{sfn|Lenin|1906}} were all written after the successful revolutions carried out by them in China, Cuba and Russia, respectively. Those texts characterized the tactic of guerrilla warfare as, according to [[Che Guevara]]'s text, being "used by the side which is supported by a majority but which possesses a much smaller number of arms for use in defense against oppression".{{sfn|Guevara|2006|p=16}}
The [[Maoism|Maoist]] Theory of People's War divides warfare into three phases. In Phase One, the guerrillas earn the population's support by distributing [[propaganda]] and attacking the organs of government. In Phase Two, escalating attacks are launched against the government's military forces and vital institutions. In Phase Three, conventional warfare and fighting are used to seize cities, overthrow the government, and assume control of the country. Mao Zedong's seminal work, ''On Guerrilla Warfare'',<ref name="mncuqf">Mao, op. cit.</ref> has been widely distributed and applied most successfully in [[Vietnam]], by military leader and theorist [[Võ Nguyên Giáp]], whose "Peoples War, Peoples Army"<ref name="ocgaog">''Peoples War, Peoples Army'', Võ Nguyên Giáp</ref> closely follows the Maoist three-phase approachs." Some authors have stressed this interchangeability of phases inherent in this model and guerrilla warfare more generally, especially as applied by the Vietcong guerrilla.<ref>Dan Jakopovich, "Time Factor in Insurrections", ''Strategic Analysis'', Vol. 32,  No. 3, May 2008.</ref>


=== Foco theory ===
=== Foco theory ===
{{Main|Foco}}
{{Main|Foco}}In the 1960s, the [[Marxist]] revolutionary [[Che Guevara]] developed the ''foco'' ({{langx|es|foquismo|link=no}}) theory of [[revolution]] in his book ''[[Guerrilla Warfare (book)|Guerrilla Warfare]]'',{{sfn|Guevara|2006|p=13}} based on his experiences during the 1959 [[Cuban Revolution]]. This theory was later formalized as "focal-ism" by [[Régis Debray]]. Its central principle is that [[vanguardism]] by [[Cadre (politics)|cadres]] of small, fast-moving [[paramilitary]] groups can provide a focus for popular discontent against a sitting regime, and thereby lead a general [[insurrection]]. Although the original approach was to mobilize and launch attacks from rural areas, many ''foco'' ideas were adapted into urban guerrilla warfare movements.
[[File:Nigerien MNJ fighter technical gun.JPG|thumb|A [[Tuareg people|Tuareg]] rebel fighter with a [[DShK]] on a [[Technical (vehicle)|technical]] in northern Niger, 2008]]
=== Nasution's ''Fundamentals of Guerrilla Warfare'' ===
{{Blockquote|Why does the guerrilla fighter fight? We must come to the inevitable conclusion that the guerrilla fighter is a social reformer, that he takes up arms responding to the angry protest of the people against their oppressors, and that he fights in order to change the social system that keeps all his unarmed brothers in ignominy and misery.| [[Che Guevara]]{{sfn|Guevara|2006|p=17}}}}
The fullest expression of the Indonesian army's founding doctrines is found in [[Abdul Haris Nasution]]'s 1953 ''[[Fundamentals of Guerrilla Warfare]]''.<ref>Abdul Haris Nasution,''Fundamentals of Guerrilla Warfare'', Informations Service of the Indonesian Armed Forces, Jakarta, 1953.https://archive.org/details/AbdulHarisNasutionFundamentalsOfGuerrillaWarfare</ref> The work is a mix of reproduced strategic directives from 1947 to 1948, Nasution's theories of guerrilla warfare, his reflections on the post-Japanese occupation period, and the likely crises to come. The work contains similar principles to those espoused or practiced by other theorists and practitioners from [[Michael Collins (Irish leader)|Michael Collins]] in Ireland, [[T. E. Lawrence]] in the Middle East and Mao in China in the early Twentieth Century. Nasution willingly shows his influences, frequently referring to some guerrilla activities as "Wingate" actions. The work substantially differs from other theorist/practitioners in that General Nasution was one of the few men to have led both a guerrilla and a counter-guerrilla war. This dual perspective on the realities of "people's war" leaves the work refreshingly free of the perceived hyperbole and ideological leanings of similar revolutionary works from the period.<ref>http://smallwarsjournal.com/mag/docs-temp/59-mcelhatton.pdf ''Guerrilla Warfare and the Indonesian Strategic Psyche'', Small Wars Journal article by Emmet McElhatton</ref>


In the 1960s, the [[Marxist]] revolutionary [[Che Guevara]] developed the ''foco'' ({{langx|es|foquismo|link=no}}) theory of [[revolution]] in his book ''[[Guerrilla Warfare (book)|Guerrilla Warfare]]'',{{sfn|Guevara|2006|p=13}} based on his experiences during the 1959 [[Cuban Revolution]]. This theory was later formalized as "focal-ism" by [[Régis Debray]]. Its central principle is that [[vanguardism]] by [[Cadre (politics)|cadres]] of small, fast-moving [[paramilitary]] groups can provide a focus for popular discontent against a sitting regime, and thereby lead a general [[insurrection]]. Although the original approach was to mobilize and launch attacks from rural areas, many ''foco'' ideas were adapted into urban guerrilla warfare movements.
== Strategy and tactics ==
[[File:Afrikaner Commandos2.JPG|thumb|upright=1.0|Boer guerrillas during the [[Second Boer War]] in South Africa]]
=== Strategic models of guerrilla warfare ===
Modern insurgencies and other types of warfare may include guerrilla warfare as part of an integrated process, complete with sophisticated [[doctrine]], organization, specialist skills and [[propaganda]] capabilities. Guerrillas can operate as small, scattered bands of raiders, but they can also work side by side with regular forces, or combine for far ranging mobile operations in [[squad]], [[platoon]] or [[battalion]] sizes, or even form conventional units. Based on their level of sophistication and organization, they can shift between all these modes as the situation demands. Successful guerrilla warfare is flexible, not static.


== Strategy, tactics and methods ==
==== Contemporary Patterns ====
{{See also|Strategy and tactics of guerrilla warfare}}
Some contemporary guerrilla warfare do not follow the Maoist template at all, and might encompass vicious ethnic strife, religious fervor, and numerous small, 'freelance' groups operating independently with little overarching structure. These patterns do not easily fit into phase-driven categories or three-echelon structures as in the People's Wars of Asia.
[[File:Afrikaner Commandos2.JPG|thumb|upright=1.0|Boer guerrillas during the [[Second Boer War]] in South Africa]]
[[File:Estonian forest brothers relaxing and cleaning their guns after a shooting exercise in Veskiaru, Järva County, Estonia, 1953. (47953893422).jpg|thumb|upright=1.0|The Estonian [[Forest Brothers]] relaxing and cleaning their guns after a shooting exercise in [[Veskiaru]], [[Järva County]], [[Estonian SSR]], in 1953]]


=== Strategy ===
Some jihadist attacks may be driven by a generalized desire to restore a reputed golden age of earlier times. Ethnic attacks likewise may materialize as bombings, assassinations, or genocidal raids as a matter of avenging perceived slights or insults, rather than a final eventual shift to conventional warfare.<ref>[http://www.smallwarsjournal.com/documents/kilcullen1.pdf ''Counterinsurgency Redux''] – David Kilcullen, 2006, retrieved June 1, 2007</ref> Environmental conditions, such as increasing urbanization and easy access to information and media also complicate the contemporary scene, and can include vast networks of peoples bound by religion and ethnicity stretched across the globe.<ref>FRANK G. HOFFMAN, "Neo-Classical counterinsurgency?", United States Army War College, ''Parameters Journal'': Summer 2007, pp. 71-87.</ref>
Guerrilla warfare is a type of [[asymmetric warfare]]: competition between opponents of unequal strength.{{sfn|Tomes|2004}} It is also a type of [[irregular warfare]]: that is, it aims not simply to defeat an invading enemy, but to win popular support and political influence, to the enemy's cost. Accordingly, guerrilla [[strategy]] aims to magnify the impact of a small, mobile force on a larger, more cumbersome one.{{sfn|Creveld|2000|pp=356–358}} If successful, guerrillas weaken their enemy by [[Attrition warfare|attrition]], eventually forcing them to withdraw.


=== Tactics ===
=== Tactics ===
{{See also|Asymmetric warfare}}
Guerrilla tactics are on [[Intelligence (information gathering)|intelligence]], [[ambush]], [[deception]], [[sabotage]], and [[espionage]], undermining an authority through long, low-intensity confrontation. A guerrilla army may increase the cost of maintaining an occupation or a colonial presence above what the foreign [[Power (international)|power]] may wish to bear. Against a local regime, the guerrilla fighters may make governance impossible with terror strikes and sabotage. These tactics are useful in demoralizing an enemy, while raising the morale of the guerrillas.
Tactically, guerrillas usually avoid confrontation with large units and formations of enemy troops but seek and attack small groups of enemy personnel and resources to gradually deplete the opposing force while minimizing their own losses. The guerrilla prizes mobility, secrecy, and surprise, organizing in small units and taking [[advantage of terrain]] that is difficult for larger units to use. For example, [[Mao Zedong]] summarized basic guerrilla tactics at the beginning of the [[Chinese Civil War]] as:<blockquote>"The enemy advances, we retreat; the enemy camps, we harass; the enemy tires, we attack; the enemy retreats, we pursue."{{sfn|Mao|1965|p=124}} </blockquote>At least one author credits the ancient Chinese work ''[[The Art of War]]'' with inspiring Mao's tactics.{{sfn|McNeilly|2003|pp=6-7}} In the 20th century, other communist leaders, including North Vietnamese [[Ho Chi Minh]], often used and developed guerrilla warfare tactics, which provided a model for their use elsewhere, leading to the Cuban "[[foco]]" theory and the anti-[[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Mujahadeen]] in [[Afghanistan]].{{sfn|McNeilly|2003|p=204}}


=== Unconventional methods ===
[[File:Hogan's Flying Column.gif|thumb|upright=1.3|[[Seán Hogan]]'s [[flying column]] of the IRA's [[3rd Tipperary Brigade]], during the [[Irish War of Independence]]]]Guerrilla operations typically include a variety of strong surprise attacks on transportation routes, individual groups of police or military, installations and structures, economic enterprises, and targeted civilians. Attacking in small groups, using camouflage and often captured weapons of that enemy, the guerrilla force can constantly keep pressure on its foes and diminish its numbers, while still allowing escape with relatively few casualties. The intention of such attacks is political, aiming to demoralize target populations or governments, or goading an overreaction that forces the population to take sides. Examples range from the chopping off of limbs in various internal African rebellions, to the suicide attacks in [[Israel]] and [[Sri Lanka]], to sophisticated manoeuvres by [[Viet Cong]] and [[Vietnam People's Army|NVA]] forces against military bases and formations.
Guerrilla groups may use [[improvised explosive device]]s and [[Logistics|logistical]] support by the local population. The opposing army may come at last to suspect all civilians as potential guerrilla backers. The guerrillas might get political support from foreign backers and many guerrilla groups are adept at public persuasion through [[propaganda]] and use of force.{{sfn|Detsch|2017}} Some guerrilla movements today also rely heavily on children as combatants, scouts, porters, spies, informants, and in other roles.{{sfn|Child Soldiers International|2016}} Many governments and states also [[child soldier|recruit children]] within their armed forces.{{sfn|United Nations Secretary-General|2017}}{{sfn|Child Soldiers International|2012}}
[[File:Ambush-vc274vs11med.jpg|thumb|Main Force 274 Regiment versus 11th Armored cav, 1966, Vietnam]]
=== Comparison of guerrilla warfare and terrorism ===
No commonly accepted [[Definitions of terrorism|definition of "terrorism"]] has attained clear consensus.{{sfn|Emmerson|2016}}{{sfn|Halibozek|Jones|Kovacich|2008|pp=4–5}}{{sfn|Williamson|2009|p=38}} The term "terrorism" is often used as political propaganda by [[belligerent]]s (most often by governments in power) to denounce opponents whose status as [[Terrorism|terrorists]] is disputed.{{sfn|Sinclair|Antonius|2012|p=30}}{{sfn|Rowe|2002|pp=3–4}}


While the primary concern of guerrillas is the enemy's active military units, actual [[Terrorism|terrorists]] largely are concerned with non-military agents and target mostly civilians.{{sfn|Tamer|2017}}
==== Ambushes ====
[[Ambush|Ambushes]] have been used for as long as guerrilla warfare has been a tactic, and many guerrilla and insurgent groups have used ambushes as a way of defeating superior enemy forces with minimal risk to the insurgents. The ability of an insurgent force to launch an attack against unsuspecting enemy forces and then withdraw in order to avoid engaging superior enemy reinforcements makes ambushes a very useful tactic for guerrilla and insurgent forces.


==Weapons of guerrilla warfare==
==== Assassinations ====
Insurgent groups have often employed assassination as a tool to further their causes. Assassinations provide several functions for such groups, namely the removal of specific enemies and as propaganda tools to focus the attention of media and politics on their cause. Assassinations were notably used as a tactic of guerilla warfare during the [[Irish War of Independence]], [[the Troubles]], the [[Basque conflict]], the [[Years of Lead (Italy)|Italian Years of Lead]], the [[Vietnam War]], and the [[Israeli–Palestinian conflict|Israeli-Palestinian conflict]].
[[File:Vcorganization2.jpg|thumb|268x268px|Simplified view of the Viet Cong organization. Functions such as security or propaganda were duplicated at each level.]]


Due to the fluid nature of irregular warfare, the weapons of guerrillas vary widely and reflect on the resources available to the unconventional force.
=== Organization ===
===Molotov cocktail===
Guerrilla warfare resembles rebellion, yet it is a different concept. Guerrilla organization ranges from local rebel groups of a few dozen guerrillas to thousands of fighters, deploying from cells to regiments. Typically, the organization has political and military wings, to allow the political leaders "plausible denial" for military attacks.<ref name="ReferenceA">"Insurgency & Terrorism: Inside Modern Revolutionary Warfare", Bard E. O'Neill</ref> The most fully elaborated guerrilla warfare structure is by the Chinese and Vietnamese communists during the revolutionary wars of East and Southeast Asia.<ref name="ReferenceB">Inside the VC and the NVA, Michael Lee Lanning and Dan Cragg</ref>
The [[Molotov cocktail]] is a generic name used for a variety of [[Improvisation|improvised]] [[Incendiary device|incendiary weapons]]. Due to the relative ease of production, they are frequently used by amateur protesters and non-professionally equipped fighters in [[urban guerrilla warfare]]. They are primarily intended to set targets ablaze rather than instantly destroy them. A Molotov cocktail is a breakable glass bottle containing a flammable substance such as [[gasoline|gasoline/petrol]] or a [[napalm]]-like mixture, with some motor oil added, and usually a source of ignition such as a burning cloth [[Capillary action|wick]] held in place by the bottle's stopper. The wick is usually soaked in alcohol or [[kerosene]], rather than gasoline.
===Improvised explosive devices===
[[File:Cougar Hit By IED.jpg|thumb|right|This [[Cougar (MRAP)|Cougar]] in Al Anbar, Iraq, was hit by a directed charge IED approximately 300–500 lbs in size.]]
An [[improvised explosive device]] ('''IED'''), also known as a '''roadside bomb''', is a homemade [[bomb]] constructed and deployed in ways other than in [[conventional warfare|conventional]] [[military]] action. It may be constructed of conventional military explosives, such as an artillery round, attached to a detonating mechanism. IEDs may be used in [[terrorist]] actions or in [[unconventional warfare]] by [[guerrilla warfare|guerrilla]]s or [[commando]] forces in a [[theater (warfare)|theater of operations]]. In the second [[Iraq War]], IEDs were used extensively against US-led Coalition forces and by the end of 2007 they had become responsible for approximately 63% of Coalition deaths in Iraq. They were also used in Afghanistan by insurgent groups, and caused over 66% of the Coalition casualties in the [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|2001–2021 Afghanistan War]].<ref>{{cite web|title=home.mytelus.com|url=http://home.mytelus.com/telusen/portal/NewsChannel.aspx?CatID=National&ArticleID=news/capfeed/national/n102529A.xml|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314021502/http://home.mytelus.com/telusen/portal/NewsChannel.aspx?CatID=National&ArticleID=news%2Fcapfeed%2Fnational%2Fn102529A.xml|archive-date=2012-03-14|access-date=2012-05-11|publisher=home.mytelus.com}}</ref>


Throughout [[The Troubles]], the [[Provisional IRA]] made extensive use of remote control IEDs against the British security forces. Initially, bombs were detonated either by timer or by simple command wire, but later in the conflict, bombs could be detonated by radio control; simple servos from [[radio-controlled aircraft]] were used to close the electrical circuit and supply power to the detonator. Roadside bombs were also extensively used; they were typically placed in a drain or culvert along a rural road and detonated by remote control when British security forces vehicles were passing. The IRA also used secondary devices to attack British reinforcements sent in after an initial blast as occurred in the [[Warrenpoint Ambush]]. IRA bombs became highly sophisticated, featuring [[anti-handling device]]s such as a [[Mercury switch|mercury tilt switch]] or [[microswitch]]es. These devices would detonate the bomb if it was moved in any way. Typically, the safety-arming device used was a clockwork [[Memopark timer]], which armed the bomb up to 60 minutes after it was placed by completing an electrical circuit supplying power to the anti-handling device. Depending on the particular design, an independent electrical circuit supplied power to a conventional timer set for the intended time delay, e.g. 40 minutes. However, some electronic delays developed by IRA technicians could be set to accurately detonate a bomb weeks after it was hidden. After the British developed jammers, IRA technicians also developed devices that required a sequence of [[Selective calling|pulsed radio codes]] to arm and detonate them that were harder to jam.
==== Law and order ====
Insurgents may attempt to create a parallel system of "justice" with punishment, beatings, and killings of criminals in order to integrate themselves with the populace. Especially in corrupt regimes where there is a deficit of true justice, people's and revolutionary courts aim to legitimize the insurgents as a government in waiting. This is doubly so if insurgents are seen as bringing order in failed regimes, regime weak in control, and situations in which the security forces are widely feared. An example of guerrilla law-and-order is found in the [[Myanmar civil war (2021-present)|Myanmar Civil War]], where groups such as the [[National Unity Government of Myanmar|National Unity Government]] and [[Karen National Union]] established their own systems of education, law enforcement, and civil service.<ref>[https://thediplomat.com/2024/09/normalizing-abnormalities-life-in-myanmars-liberated-zone/ Normalizing Abnormalities: Life in Myanmar’s Resistance Zone] Helen Li. [[The Diplomat (magazine)|The Diplomat]]. September 16, 2024</ref><ref>[https://asiatimes.com/2024/11/from-war-to-governance-in-resistance-liberated-areas-of-myanmar/ From war to governance in resistance-liberated areas of Myanmar] Aung Thura Ko Ko. November 27, 2024. [[Asia_Times]]</ref><ref>[https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-judicial-system-06262024032102.html War, lack of resources complicate judicial plans in Myanmar rebel zones] Kiana Duncan. July 26, 2024. [[Radio_Free_Asia]]</ref>


Starting six months before the [[Soviet–Afghan War|invasion]] of [[Afghanistan]] by the [[USSR]] on 27 December 1979, the [[Afghan mujahideen]] were supplied by the CIA, among others, with large quantities of many different types of [[anti-tank mine]]s. The insurgents often removed the explosives from several anti-tank mines and combined the explosives in a tin cooking-oil can in order to ensure that a target vehicle would be destroyed.<ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last=Ali Ahmad Jalali |first=Lester W. Grau |title=The Other Side of the Mountain: Mujahideen Tactics in the Soviet-Afghan War |date=3 July 2012 |publisher=United States Marine Corps Studies and Analysis Division |isbn=978-1-62358-055-1 |pages=126–127 |language=English}}</ref> By combining the explosives from several mines and placing them in tin cans, the insurgents made them more powerful, but sometimes also easier to detect by Soviet sappers using [[Demining|mine detectors]]. After an IED was detonated, the insurgents often used direct-fire weapons such as machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades to initiate an ambush. Afghan insurgents also made IEDs from Soviet unexploded ordnance, such as 250-500 kg (500-1000) aerial bombs.<ref name=":3" /> The devices were triggered by a variety of methods, including remote control, pressure plates (some designed to detonate only after several vehicles drove over them), tripwires, pressure-release plates held down by roadblocks, and electrical cables that triggered only when the metal tracks of a tank or BMP drove over them;<ref name=":4" /> these devices were hidden under roads and mountain passes and inside water wells, abandoned caves and buildings.<ref name=":4" /> The Soviets responded by issuing soldiers with [[flak jacket]]s, reinforcing and sandbagging the floors of their vehicles, and riding on top of vehicles instead of inside them,<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Grau |first=Lester W. |title=IEDs, Land Mines, and Booby Traps in the Soviet-Afghan War |url=https://www.benning.army.mil/infantry/magazine/issues/2019/Summer/pdf/15_LP_Grau_txt.pdf |publisher=U.S. Army |work= Infantry Magazine |date=Summer 2019 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221003142109/https://www.benning.army.mil/infantry/magazine/issues/2019/Summer/pdf/15_LP_Grau_txt.pdf |archive-date= Oct 3, 2022 }}</ref> but casualties remained high, with 1,995 Soviet soldiers and 1,191 vehicles lost to mines and IEDs during the Soviet-Afghan War.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Grau |first=Lester W. |title=The Bear Went Over the Mountain: Soviet Combat Tactics in Afghanistan |pages=82 |language=English}}</ref>
==== Propaganda ====
 
[[File:Nigerien MNJ fighter technical gun.JPG|thumb|A [[Tuareg people|Tuareg]] rebel fighter with a [[DShK]] on a [[Technical (vehicle)|technical]] in northern Niger, 2008]]
During the [[First Chechen War|First]] and [[Second Chechen War]]s, the separatist [[Chechen Republic of Ichkeria]] made use of IEDs extensively against the [[Russian Armed Forces]] once they were forced to rely on guerrilla tactics, constructing them from a variety of materials such as 155mm artillery shells, 82mm mortar shells, unexploded ordnance and industrial explosives.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Billingsley |first=Dodge |title=Fangs of the Lone Wolf: Chechen Tactics in the Russian-Chechen Wars 1994-2009 |pages=172 |language=English}}</ref> These devices were usually command-detonated using an electrical command wire and hidden in sewer lines, piles of trash, destroyed vehicles, or placed directly on or under the surface or [[Shoulder (road)|shoulder]] of a road, as well in trees or hillsides.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Kulikov |first=Sergey |date= |title=The Tactics of Insurgent Groups in the Republic of Chechnya |url=https://community.apan.org/cfs-file/__key/docpreview-s/00-00-08-44-77/2013_2D00_11_2D00_01-The-Tactics-of-Insurgent-Groups-in-the-Republic-of-Chechnya-_2800_Kulikov_2900_.pdf}}</ref> Sometimes, insurgents combined antitank with antipersonnel devices, with one charge to target a vehicle, the other to target infantry dismounting from the vehicle.<ref name=":2" /> For propaganda purposes, IED teams often had a cameraman whose job was to record IED attacks and post it online.<ref name=":1" />
[[Propaganda]] is used to sell to the populace the legitimacy, morality and ability of the insurgents, while simultaneously portraying the government and its security forces in a negative light. This propaganda can be [[Propaganda of the deed|of the deed]], spectacular acts of assassination, sabotage and violence, relying on the mass media to spread the insurgents message. Older means of disseminating messaging include [[Pamphlet|pamphletting]] (e.g. [[Thomas Paine]]'s [[Common Sense (pamphlet)|Common Sense]]) and through use of the oral tradition of stories, [[Irish rebel song|rebel]] and [[Revolutionary song|revolutionary songs]]. Modern insurgents often use the internet.<ref>[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-65906961 The mobile game funding a revolution in Myanmar] [[BBC_News]]. August 27, 2023. Oliver Slow.</ref>
 
Since the [[War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)|2001 invasion of Afghanistan]], the [[Taliban]] and its supporters have used IEDs against [[NATO]] and Afghan military and civilian vehicles. This has become the most common method of attack against NATO forces, with IED attacks increasing consistently year on year; according to a report by the Homeland Security Market Research in the US, the number of IEDs used in Afghanistan had increased by 400 percent since 2007 and the number of troops killed by them by 400 percent, and those wounded by 700 percent. It has been reported that IEDs are the number one cause of death among NATO troops in Afghanistan.
 
Beginning in July 2003, the [[Iraqi insurgency (Iraq War)|Iraqi insurgency]] used IEDs to target invading coalition vehicles. Many of these IEDs were made from military explosives looted from munitions bunkers following the [[2003 invasion of Iraq|2003 invasion]], such as landmines stripped of their explosives, 155-millimetre [[Shell (projectile)|artillery shells]] rigged with [[blasting cap]]s and modified aviation bombs of 500 lb or more, detonated by systems such as pull-wires and mechanical [[detonator]]s, cell-phones, garage-door openers, [[Electrical cable|cables]], [[radio control]] (RC), and infrared lasers among others. To counter increasing armor protection, the insurgents have also developed IEDs that make use of [[Explosively formed penetrator|explosively formed projectiles]] (EFPs); these are essentially cylindrical shaped charges usually constructed with a machined concave metal disc (often copper) facing the target, pointed inward. The force of the shaped charge turns the disc into a high velocity slug, capable of penetrating the armor of most enemy vehicles. Commonly positions for IEDs include on [[utility pole]]s, [[road signs]] or [[tree]]s, buried underground or in piles of garbage, disguised as rocks or bricks, and even inside dead animals. Typically they explode underneath or to the side of the vehicle, however, IEDs in elevated positions such as on road signs are able hit less protected areas. It has been estimated by the ''[[Washington Post]]'' that as much as 64% of U.S. deaths in Iraq occurred due to IEDs.
 
IEDs have also been used extensively by other groups, such as [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoists]] in India,<ref>{{Cite news|last=Sethi|first=Aman|date=2010-04-04|title=Troop fatality figures show changing Maoist strategy|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/Troop-fatality-figures-show-changing-Maoist-strategy/article13656817.ece|access-date=2021-06-18|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> [[ISIS|ISIL]] in Syria and across the world, and by the [[Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam]] (LTTE) in [[Sri Lanka]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Suicide Terrorism: A Global Threat|url=https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/srilanka/globalthreat.html|access-date=2009-10-18|publisher=PBS}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=2006-04-13|title=13 killed in blasts, arson in Sri Lanka|work=[[The Hindu]]|location=Chennai, India|url=http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/13/stories/2006041304711500.htm|url-status=dead|access-date=2009-10-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060414141621/http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/13/stories/2006041304711500.htm|archive-date=2006-04-14}}</ref>
 
===Acquiring conventional weapons===
====Legal civilian firearms====
 
Initial weapons of the guerrilla can include firearms that are legal for the civilian population to own. Depending on the country, these can range from [[muzzleloaders]] and double-barreled shotguns to bolt-action and semi-automatic rifles. These arms can either be legally purchased or stolen. In Cuba, [[Fidel Castro]] and his supporters used [[.22 long rifle|.22LR rifles]] in their [[Attack on the Moncada Barracks|attack on the Moncada Barracks]].<ref>de la Cova, Antonio Rafael (2007). The Moncada Attack: Birth of the Cuban Revolution. University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-57003-672-9. p.72</ref>
====Captured enemy weapons====
Insurgencies have long made use of weapons stolen, captured or otherwise procured from enemy forces due to the ease of procuring them and their ammunition, something that is very important to an insurgency which will be poorly equipped and will need whatever weaponry it can get. Such weapons are typically acquired by either looting them from enemy soldiers that they have defeated, by having infiltrators and sympathisers in the enemy forces steal munitions and secretly supply it to them, by gathering munitions abandoned by retreating, advancing or neglectful enemy soldiers, or by purchasing munitions sold by enemy soldiers on the [[black market]].
 
During [[World War II]], firearms captured from the [[Axis powers]] were used extensively by [[Resistance during World War II|resistance movements]] in Europe and the Pacific, due to their availability. These weapons were used alongside weapons supplied by the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]] and weapons inherited from their countries' previous militaries. Methods of acquiring weapons included purchasing them on the black market from Axis soldiers or their allies or stealing from German supply depots or transports.<ref>Rafal E. Stolarski, [http://www.polishresistance-ak.org/25%20Article.htm ''The Production of Arms and Explosive Materials by the Polish Home Army in the Years 1939–1945''.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160823094606/http://www.polishresistance-ak.org/25%20Article.htm |date=2016-08-23 }} Archived 30 October 2022 at the [[Wayback Machine]] Translated from Polish by Antoni Bohdanowicz. Article on the pages of the London Branch of the Polish Home Army Ex-Servicemen Association. Retrieved 14 March 2008.</ref> Special efforts were also made to capture weapons from the Axis, such as raids were conducted on trains and vehicles carrying equipment to the front, as well as on guardhouses and [[gendarmerie]] posts, that proved highly successful. Sometimes weapons were taken from individual Axis soldiers accosted in streets or were brought over by defecting [[Collaboration with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy|Axis collaborators]]. During the [[Warsaw Uprising]], the Polish [[Home Army|Armia Krajowa]] (AK, Home Army) even managed to capture several German armored vehicles, most notably a [[Jagdpanzer 38 Hetzer]] light tank destroyer renamed "Chwat" and an [[Sd.Kfz. 251]] [[armoured personnel carrier]] renamed "Grey Wolf".<ref>Evan McGilvray (19 July 2015). [https://books.google.com/books?id=YYQwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR6 ''Days of Adversity: The Warsaw Uprising 1944''.] Helion & Company. pp. 6–. {{ISBN|978-1-912174-34-8}}</ref> Captured German weapons used by European resistance groups included the [[Karabiner 98k]] bolt-action rifle and [[MP 40]] submachine gun, while resistance groups in the Pacific used captured Japanese weapons such as the [[Nambu pistol]] and [[Arisaka]] bolt-action rifle.
 
During the [[First Indochina War]], the Indochinese [[Viet Minh]] used weapons abandoned by or captured from the Japanese during WWII, but also made use of weapons captured from the French and their [[French Indochina]] administration, such as the [[MAS-36 rifle|MAS-36]] and [[MAS-49 rifle|MAS-49]] rifles, [[MAT-49]] submachine gun and the [[FM 24/29 light machine gun|FM 24/29]], [[Reibel machine gun|Reibel]], [[Vickers machine gun|Vickers]] and [[Hotchkiss Mle 1914 machine gun|Hotchkiss M1914]], [[Hotchkiss M1922 machine gun|M1922]] and [[Hotchkiss M1929 machine gun|M1929]] machine guns.
 
Japanese and French weapons continued to see service with the [[Liberation Army of South Vietnam]] of the [[Viet Cong]] during the [[Vietnam War]], with regular units using them during the early stages of the war, before they were passed down to militia units. They also used U.S-made weapons captured from the [[South Vietnam]]ese [[Army of the Republic of Vietnam]], such as [[M1911 pistol|M1911]] pistols, [[Thompson submachine gun|Thompson]] and [[M3 submachine gun|M3]] submachine guns, [[M1 Garand]] rifles, [[M1 carbine|M1]] and [[M2 Carbine|M2]] carbines and [[M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle|M1918 BAR]] and [[M1919 Browning machine gun|M1919 Browning]] machine guns, which they either captured in ambushes or raids or purchased off of the black market, the latter case being made possible by [[Corruption|corrupt]] ARVN military officers illegally selling munitions for profit. Later in the war following the U.S intervention, more modern U.S weapons such as [[M14 rifle|M14]] and [[M16 rifle|M16]] rifles, [[M60 machine gun|M60]] and [[M2 Browning]] machine guns and [[M79 grenade launcher|M79]] grenade launchers were captured from U.S forces and the increasingly modernised ARVN.
====Plausible deniability and sanitized arms====
[[Plausible deniability]] allows the supply of arms by governments to insurgents without the need for over elaborate ruses. For instance, the sheer number of [[AKM]] (an upgraded version of the AK-47 rifle) manufacturers and [[AKM#Users|users]] in the world means that governments can supply these weapons to insurgents with plausible deniability as to exactly from where and from whom the guns were acquired. Governments of nations with self-sufficient arms industries may intentionally remove identifying marks of their weapons for this purpose.<ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0515/p02s01-woiq.html In gun seizures, some surprise finds] {{Webarchive|url= http://web.archive.org/web/20030529080449/https://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0515/p02s01-woiq.html|date=May 29, 2003}} On 2003 seizure that found a sanitized Sig Sauer pistol. ''[[The Christian Science Monitor]]''. (May 15, 2003 edition, author Warren Richey)</ref> For example, the [[Yugoslavia]]n [[Zastava M48]]BO (for ''bez oznake'', 'without markings') rifle was manufactured with no markings save for a serial number. These were made in Yugoslavia for delivery to [[Egypt]] prior to the [[Suez Crisis]] of 1956. Yugoslavia was technically a neutral country, and by sanitizing the rifles sold to the Egyptians, it hoped to distance itself from the conflict between [[Egypt]] and [[Israel]]. Only a few hundred of the few thousand made were delivered to Egypt, the rest remaining in storage in Yugoslavia until the post-Yugoslav states rediscovered them. They are currently being sold to civilian collectors.<ref>[https://www.breachbangclear.com/yugoslavian-m48-mauser/ Zastava M48 Mauser: Milsurp Gem] Breach, Bang, Clear. Bucky Lawson. June 16, 2023</ref><ref>[https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2017/06/27/syrian-civil-war-wwii-weapons-used/ Syrian Civil War: WWII weapons used] WWIIAfterWWII. June 27, 2017</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20060222085140/http://www.marstar.ca/Y-E-48BO.htm Marstar Canada] firearm's retailer's info page on Yugoslavian M-48BO "sanitized" rifle.</ref>


===Soviet Bloc weaponry===
==== Recruitment of sympathizers within the state ====
Due to the massive exportation of weaponry by the [[Soviet Union]] and the [[Eastern Bloc]] to communist governments and insurgencies in foreign countries, as well as the production of Soviet-made weaponry by many militaries around the world, Soviet-made weapons and their copies are widely available, being present in most [[Third World]] countries throughout [[Asia]], [[Africa]] and the [[Middle East]]. Of particular notability is the [[AK-47]] assault rifle and its [[AKM]] variant which have seen service in almost every conflict since the [[Korean War]] in the militaries of [[Third World]] countries and insurgent groups due to its wide availability, simplicity, reliability, durability and ease of use, however they are just two of countless other types of Soviet [[World War II]]-era weapons, such as the [[TT pistol]], [[Mosin–Nagant]] bolt-action rifle, [[PPSh-41]] submachine gun, [[RPD machine gun|RPD]] and [[SG-43 Goryunov]] medium machine guns and [[DShK]] heavy machine gun, and [[Cold War]]-era weapons such as the [[AK-74]] assault  rifle, [[RPK]] light machine gun, [[PK machine gun|PK]] general-purpose machine gun, [[Dragunov sniper rifle|SVD-63 Dragunov]] sniper rifle and [[RPG-2]] and [[RPG-7]] rocket launchers.
Insurgent organizations may recruit members of the government's civil and security forces to their cause or to have their own members join them. In addition to providing intelligence and possibly providing aid, doing so allows insurgent members to gain military training and skills which they would not otherwise be able to access. These members may then serve as a [[Cadre (military)|cadre]] to train other insurgents; those who rise high enough may become [[agents of influence]].[[File:Estonian forest brothers relaxing and cleaning their guns after a shooting exercise in Veskiaru, Järva County, Estonia, 1953. (47953893422).jpg|thumb|upright=1.0|Estonian [[Forest Brothers]] relaxing and cleaning their guns after a shooting exercise in [[Veskiaru]], [[Järva County]], [[Estonian SSR]], in 1953]]


The first large-scale usage by an insurgency of the Kalashnikov series weapons was during the [[Vietnam War]], when massive numbers of Soviet, Chinese and [[Eastern Bloc]]-produced AKs and RPKs, along with limited numbers of PKs and SVD-63s, were provided by communist countries to [[North Vietnam]], which supplied them to the [[South Vietnamese]] [[Viet Cong]], [[Laos|Laotian]] [[Pathet Lao]] and [[Cambodia]]n [[Khmer Rouge]]. Due to the massive numbers of weapons that were supplied, they became the primary weapons of these groups and of the [[North Vietnamese army]], replacing [[World War II]]-era French and Soviet-produced bolt-action rifles and submachine guns and supplanting weapons captured from [[United States|U.S]] and South Vietnamese forces.
==== Intelligence ====
====Rocket-propelled grenades====
For successful operations, surprise must be achieved by the guerrillas. If the operation has been betrayed or compromised, it is usually called off immediately. Intelligence is also extremely important, and detailed knowledge of the target's dispositions, weaponry and morale is gathered before any attack.
[[File:Rebel in northern Central African Republic 04.jpg|thumb|A rebel in northern Central African Republic with an RPG]]
[[Rocket-propelled grenades]] (RPGs) were used extensively during the [[Vietnam War]] (by the [[Vietnam People's Army]] and [[Vietcong|Viet Cong]]),<ref>[http://www.mrfa.org/ccbfund.htm CCB-18 Memorial Fund] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006174558/http://www.mrfa.org/ccbfund.htm|date=2014-10-06}}</ref> [[Soviet invasion of Afghanistan]] by the [[Mujahideen]] and against South Africans in [[Angola]] and [[Namibia]] (formerly [[South West Africa]]) by [[SWAPO]] guerrillas during what the South Africans called the [[South African Border War]]. Twenty years later, they are still being used widely in recent conflict areas such as [[Chechnya]], [[Iraq]], and [[Sri Lanka]].


The RPG still remains a potent threat to armored vehicles, especially in situations such as [[urban warfare]] or [[jungle warfare]], where they are favored by guerrillas. They are most effective when used in restricted terrain as the availability of cover and concealment can make it difficult for the intended target to spot the RPG operator. Note that this concealment is often preferably outdoors, because firing an RPG within an enclosed area may create a dangerous [[backblast area|backblast]].
Intelligence can be harvested in several ways. Collaborators and sympathizers will usually provide a steady flow of useful information. Employment or enrollment as a student may be undertaken near the target zone, community organizations may be infiltrated, and even romantic relationships struck up as part of intelligence gathering.<ref name="cmeuqr">Lanning/Cragg, op. cit.</ref> Public sources of information are also invaluable to the guerrilla; modern computer access via the World Wide Web makes harvesting and collation of such data relatively easy.<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/05/AR2005080501138.html Terrorist use of web spreads]</ref> The use of on-the-spot reconnaissance is integral to operational planning.


In Afghanistan, [[Mujahideen]] guerrilla fighters used RPG-7s to destroy [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] vehicles. To assure a kill, two to four RPG shooters would be assigned to each vehicle. Each armored-vehicle hunter-killer team could have had as many as 15 RPGs per unit.<ref>{{cite magazine | first = Jim | last = Wilson | title = Weapons of the Insurgents | magazine = Popular Mechanics | date = March 2004 | volume = 181 | issue = 3 | issn = 0032-4558 | publisher = Hearst Magazines}}</ref> In areas where vehicles were confined to a single path (a mountain road, swamps, snow, urban areas), RPG teams trapped convoys by destroying the first and last vehicles in line, preventing movement of the other vehicles. This tactic was especially effective in cities. Convoys learned to avoid approaches with overhangs and to send infantrymen forward in hazardous areas to detect the RPG teams. Multiple shooters were also effective against heavy tanks with [[reactive armor]]: The first shot would be against the driver's viewing prisms. Following shots would be in pairs, one to set off the reactive armor, the second to penetrate the tank's armor. Favored weak spots were the top and rear of the turret.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2012-07-19|title=Army News {{!}} News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Army Times|url=http://www.armytimes.com/legacy/new/0-ARMYPAPER-1722465.php|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120719055905/http://www.armytimes.com/legacy/new/0-ARMYPAPER-1722465.php|archive-date=2012-07-19|access-date=2021-06-18|website=archive.is}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The RPG-7 On the Battlefields of Today and Tomorrow|url=https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1998/infantry-rpg.htm|access-date=2021-06-18|website=globalsecurity.org}}</ref>
==== Relationships with civilian populations ====
Relationships with civilian populations are influenced by whether the guerrillas operate among a hostile or friendly population. A friendly population is of immense importance to guerrilla fighters, providing shelter, supplies, financing, intelligence and recruits, being the key lifeline of any guerrilla movement. Popular mass support in a confined local area or country, however, is not always strictly necessary. Guerrillas and revolutionary groups can still operate using the protection of a friendly regime, drawing supplies, weapons, intelligence, local security and diplomatic cover.


The Mujahideen sometimes used RPG-7s at extreme range, exploded by their 4.5-second self-destruct timer, which translates to roughly 950m flight distance, as a method of long distance approach denial for enemy infantry and reconnaissance.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|date=2016-02-01|title=Dead Men Risen: The Welsh Guards and the Defining Story of Britain's War in ... - Toby Harnden - Google Books|isbn=9781849168052|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WYI0VodiSFkC&dq=rpg+7+self-destruct+timer&pg=PT608|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160201165302/https://books.google.com/books?id=WYI0VodiSFkC&pg=PT608&dq=rpg+7+self-destruct+timer&hl=en&sa=X&ei=K_4fT6rLAsHRrQfk69iUDA&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=rpg%207%20self-destruct%20timer&f=false|archive-date=2016-02-01|access-date=2021-06-18|last1=Harnden|first1=Toby|publisher=Quercus }}</ref>
An apathetic or hostile population makes life difficult for guerrilla fighters, and strenuous attempts are usually made to gain their support. These may involve both persuasion and calculated policy of intimidation. Guerrilla forces may characterize a variety of operations as a liberation struggle, but this may or may not result in sufficient support from affected civilians. Other factors, including ethnic and religious hatreds, can make a simple national liberation claim untenable. Whatever the exact mix of persuasion or coercion used by guerrillas, relationships with civil populations are one of the most important factors in their success or failure.<ref>"Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam", Robert Thompson</ref>[[File:6-de-junio-1808.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Spanish guerrilla resistance to the Napoleonic French invasion of Spain at the [[Battle of Valdepeñas]]]]
==== Terrorism and other crimes against humanity ====
In some cases, the use of [[terrorism]] can be an aspect of guerrilla warfare. Terrorism is used to focus international attention on the guerrilla cause, kill opposition leaders, extort money from targets, intimidate the general population, create economic loss, and keep followers and potential defectors in line. The use of terrorism can also provoke the greater power to launch a disproportionate response, which may alienating a civilian population sympathetic to the terrorist's cause. Such tactics may backfire and cause the civil population to withdraw its support, or to back countervailing forces against the guerrillas.<ref name="ReferenceA2">"Insurgency & Terrorism: Inside Modern Revolutionary Warfare", Bard E. O'Neill</ref>


In the [[History of Iraq (2003–2011)|period following the 2003 invasion of Iraq]], the RPG became a favorite weapon of the insurgent forces fighting U.S. troops. Since most of the readily available [[RPG-7]] rounds cannot penetrate [[M1 Abrams]] tank armor from almost any angle, it is primarily effective against soft-skinned or lightly armored vehicles, and infantry. Even if the RPG hit does not completely disable the tank or kill the crew, it can still damage external equipment, lowering the tank's effectiveness or forcing the crew to abandon and destroy it. Newer RPG-7 rounds are more capable, and in August 2006, an RPG-29 round penetrated the frontal ERA of a [[Challenger 2]] tank during an engagement in [[al-Amarah]], [[Iraq]], and wounded several crew members.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2016-03-15|title=News|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/|url-status=dead|access-date=2021-06-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315231128/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/|archive-date=March 15, 2016|issn=0307-1235}}</ref>
As an [[initiation]], new recruits, especially forced ones, may be encouraged or forced to participate in atrocities, such as torture, rape and murder, unwilling recruits will be forced to do this against their own communities and families or be killed themselves. The goal of these atrocities is to divorce the new recruit from their previous life and bind them to the insurgency; criminals in their own eyes and in the eyes of society, such recruits will be led to believe that they cannot go back to their previous lives and have no other family other than the insurgency. In order to break the hold the insurgency may hold over such members, the authorities may offer amnesties and pardons for crimes committed.{{Citation needed|date=May 2025}}


During the [[South African Border War]], the Soviet RPGs used by [[SWAPO]] guerrillas and their [[Angola]]n supporters posed a serious threat to [[South Africa]]'s lightly armored [[armored personnel carrier|APCs]], which could be easily targeted as soon as they stopped to disembark troops.  During the [[First Chechen War|First]] (1994–1996) and [[Second Chechen War]]s (1999–2009), [[Chechnya|Chechen]] rebels used RPGs to attack Russian tanks from basements and high rooftops. This tactic was effective because tank main guns could not be depressed or raised far enough to return fire, in addition, armor on the very top and bottom of tanks was usually the weakest. Russian forces had to rely on [[artillery]] suppression, good crew gunners and infantry screens to prevent such attacks. Tank columns were eventually protected by attached [[self-propelled anti-aircraft gun]]s ([[ZSU-23-4 Shilka]], [[9K22 Tunguska]]) used in the ground role to suppress and destroy Chechen ambushes. Chechen fighters formed independent "cells" that worked together to destroy a specific Russian armored target. Each cell contained small arms and some form of RPG ([[RPG-7]]V or [[RPG-18]], for example). The small arms were used to button the tank up and keep any infantry occupied, while the RPG gunner struck at the tank. While doing so, other teams would attempt to fire at the target in order to overwhelm the Russians' ability to effectively counter the attack. To further increase the chance of success, the teams took up positions at different elevations where possible. Firing from the third and higher floors allowed good shots at the weakest armor (the top).<ref>{{Cite web|date=2010-04-30|title=Foreign Military Studies Office Publications - Russian-Manufactured Armored Vehicle Vulnerability in Urban Combat: The Chechnya Experience|url=http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/rusav/rusav.htm|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100430184415/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/rusav/rusav.htm|archive-date=2010-04-30|access-date=2021-06-18}}</ref> When the Russians began moving in tanks fitted with [[Reactive armor|explosive reactive armor]] (ERA), the Chechens had to adapt their tactics, because the RPGs they had access to were unlikely to result in the destruction of the tank.
Insurgents often [[Kidnapping|kidnap]] and take hostage members of the general public or military for the provision of funding or the release of prisoners. The kidnapping of family members may be used to coerce co-operation, the provision of information, or the right to use property as a safe house. High-value hostages may be taken in order to force the release of captured comrades and as media spectaculars. Creating a fear of kidnapping reinforces a message that the state and its security forces cannot provide protection.{{Citation needed|date=November 2021}}


Using RPGs as improvised anti-aircraft batteries has proved successful in Somalia, Afghanistan and Chechnya. [[Helicopter]]s are typically ambushed as they land, take off or hover. In [[Afghanistan]], the [[Mujahideen]] often modified RPGs for use against Soviet helicopters by adding a curved pipe to the rear of the launcher tube, which diverted the backblast, allowing the RPG to be fired upward at aircraft from a prone position. This made the operator less visible prior to firing and decreased the risk of injury from hot exhaust gases. The Mujahideen also utilized the 4.5-second timer on RPG rounds to make the weapon function as part of a [[flak]] battery, using multiple launchers to increase hit probabilities.<ref name=":0" /> At the time, Soviet helicopters countered the threat from RPGs at landing zones by first clearing them with anti-personnel [[Suppression fire|saturation fire]]. The Soviets also varied the number of accompanying helicopters (two or three) in an effort to upset Afghan force estimations and preparation. In response, the Mujahideen prepared dug-in firing positions with top cover, and again, Soviet forces altered their tactics by using air-dropped [[Thermobaric weapon|thermobaric fuel-air bombs]] on such landing zones. As the U.S.-supplied [[FIM-92 Stinger|Stinger]] [[surface-to-air missile]]s became available to them, the Afghans abandoned RPG attacks as the smart missiles proved especially efficient in the destruction of unarmed Soviet transport helicopters, such as [[Mil Mi-17]]. In [[Somalia]], both of the [[UH-60 Black Hawk]] helicopters lost by U.S. forces during the [[Battle of Mogadishu (1993)|Battle of Mogadishu]] in 1993 were downed by RPG-7s.
[[File:Women guerrilla.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Lakhdari, [[Zohra Drif|Drif]], [[Djamila Bouhired|Bouhired]] and [[Hassiba Ben Bouali|Bouali]]. Female Algerian guerrillas of the [[Algerian War|Algerian War of Independence]], {{circa|1956}}.]]


===Homemade or improvised firearms===
==== Sabotage ====
[[File:Home-made 12-gauge shotgun used by Bosniac fighters.jpg|thumb|right|A crude but effective improvised 12-gauge shotgun used during the [[Bosnian War]]]]
[[Sabotage]] against infrastructure, such as power stations, airports and reservoirs at the upper end, and for example electricity pylons, substations, telephone exchanges and railway tracks at the lower end make real to the populace that an insurgency is underway; and if sustained can affect the quality of life of the populace.{{Citation needed|date=November 2021}} Sabotage was notably used by a variety of forces during the [[World War II|Second World War]], the [[Malayan Emergency]], the [[Vietnam War]], the [[Soviet–Afghan War|Soviet-Afghan War]], and the [[Nicaraguan Revolution]] and reactive [[Contras|Contras Insurgency]].
{{main|Improvised firearm}}


The [[Błyskawica submachine gun|Błyskawica]] (Lightning) was a simple [[submachine gun]]  produced by the [[Armia Krajowa]], or Home Army, a Polish [[resistance movement]] fighting the [[Germany|Germans]] in [[History of Poland (1939–45)|occupied Poland]]. It was produced in underground workshops. Its main feature was its simplicity, so that the weapon could be made even in small workshops, by inexperienced engineers. It used threaded pipes for simplicity.
=== Withdrawal ===
Guerrillas must plan carefully for withdrawal once an operation has been completed, or if it is going badly. The withdrawal phase is sometimes regarded as the most important part of a planned action, and to get entangled in a lengthy struggle with superior forces is usually fatal to insurgent, terrorist or revolutionary operatives. Withdrawal is usually accomplished using a variety of different routes and methods and may include quickly scouring the area for loose weapons, evidence cleanup, and disguise as peaceful civilians.<ref name="mncuqf2">Mao, op. cit.</ref>


In some cases, guerrillas have used improvised, repurposed firearms. One example is described by [[Che Guevara]] in his book ''[[Guerrilla Warfare (book)|Guerrilla Warfare]]''. Called the "M-16", it consists of a 16 gauge [[sawed-off shotgun]] provided with a bipod to hold the barrel at a 45-degree angle.  This was loaded with a [[blank (cartridge)|blank cartridge]] formed by removing the shot from a standard shot shell, followed by a wooden rod with a [[Molotov cocktail]] attached to the front.  This formed an improvised [[Mortar (weapon)|mortar]] capable of firing the incendiary device accurately out to a range of 100 meters.<ref>{{cite book |title=Guerrilla Warfare |author=Ernesto "Che" Guevara |year=1961 |publisher=Praeger}}</ref>
== Additional factors ==


[[Flare gun]]s have also been converted to firearms.  This may be accomplished by replacing the (often plastic) barrel of the flare gun with a metal pipe strong enough to chamber a [[shotgun shell]], or by inserting a smaller bore barrel into the existing barrel (such as with a [[caliber conversion sleeve]]) to chamber a firearm cartridge, such as a [[.22 Long Rifle]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/ct/Newsletters/PSN%20Newsletter%20Winter%202003.pdf |title=Project Safe Neighborhoods |author=US Department of Justice, District of Connecticut |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040725095406/http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/ct/Newsletters/PSN%20Newsletter%20Winter%202003.pdf |archive-date=2004-07-25 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/964416.P.pdf |title=UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARRY WILLIAM DOWNER |author=UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT |access-date=2013-04-13 |archive-date=2012-03-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120306034152/http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/964416.P.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
=== Ethical dimensions ===
Civilians may be attacked or killed as punishment for alleged [[Collaborationism|collaboration]], or as a policy of intimidation and coercion. Such attacks are usually sanctioned by the guerrilla leadership with an eye toward the political objectives to be achieved. Attacks may be aimed to weaken civilian morale so that support for the guerrilla's opponents decreases. [[Civil war|Civil wars]] may also involve deliberate attacks against civilians, with both guerrilla groups and organized armies committing [[wiktionary:atrocity|atrocities]]. Ethnic and religious feuds may involve widespread massacres and genocide as competing factions inflict massive violence on targeted civilian population. Guerrillas in wars against foreign powers may direct their attacks at civilians, particularly if foreign forces are too strong to be confronted directly on a long-term basis.


In the [[Myanmar civil war (2021-present)|Myanmar Civil War]], 3D-printed weapons such as the [[FGC-9]] were seen in the hands of anti-[[State Administration Council|military junta]] rebel forces.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hanrahan |first=Jake |title=Twitter thread with a collection of photos of Myanmar rebels armed with FGC. |url=https://twitter.com/jake_hanrahan/status/1468966318317531140 |url-status=live|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20220505184550/https://twitter.com/Jake_Hanrahan/status/1468966318317531140|archive-date= May 5, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-21 |title=SSTF လူငယ်တွေဦးဆောင်ပြီး FGC 9 ကာကွယ်ရေး ပြောင်းရှည်သေနတ်ထုတ်လုပ် - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=Cw3K-owAITc |access-date=2024-03-24 |website=YouTube |archive-date=2023-10-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231021130211/https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=Cw3K-owAITc |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>[https://observers.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20220114-3d-printed-weapons-myanmar-rebels How rebel fighters are using 3D-printed arms to fight the Myanmar junta] January 7, 2022. [[France24]]. Thomas Eydoux.</ref><ref>[https://www.wired.com/story/the-rebel-drone-maker-of-myanmar/ The Rebel Drone Maker of Myanmar] September 29, 2023. Daphne Wesdorp. [[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]</ref>
=== Law of war ===
Guerrilleros are in danger of not being recognized as [[lawful]] [[Combatant|combatants]] because they may not wear a [[uniform]], (to mingle with the local population), or their uniform and distinctive emblems may not be recognized as such by their opponents.


=== Purpose-designed weapons ===
Article 44, sections 3 and 4 of the 1977 [[Protocol I|First Additional Protocol]] to the [[Geneva Conventions]], "relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts", does recognize combatants who, because of the nature of the conflict, do not wear uniforms as long as they carry their weapons openly during military operations. This gives non-uniformed guerrilleros lawful combatant status against countries that have ratified this convention. However, the same protocol states in Article 37.1.c that "''the feigning of civilian, non-combatant status''" shall constitute [[perfidy]] and is prohibited by the Geneva Conventions. So is the wearing of enemy uniform, as happened in the [[Second Boer War|Boer War]].
A fairly recent class of firearms, purpose-designed insurgency weapons first appeared during [[World War II]], in the form of such arms as the [[FP-45 Liberator]] and the [[Sten]] [[submachine gun]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20051218081536/http://www.nfa.ca/nfafiles/cfjarchive/firearms/liberator.html Canada's National Firearms Association's] page on the FP-45 Liberator and the CIA Deer Gun.</ref> Designed to be inexpensive, since they were to be [[airdrop]]ped or smuggled behind enemy lines, insurgency weapons were designed for use by guerrilla and insurgent groups. Most insurgency weapons are of simple design, typically made of sheet [[steel]] [[Stamping (metalworking)|stamping]]s, which are then folded into shape and welded. Tubular steel in standard sizes is also used when possible, and barrels (one of the few firearm parts that require fine tolerances and high strength) may be [[rifled]] (like the Sten) or left [[smoothbore]] (like the FP-45).


The CIA [[Deer gun]] of the 1960s was similar to the Liberator, but used an aluminum casting for the body of the pistol, and was chambered in [[9 mm Luger Parabellum|9×19 mm Parabellum]], one of the all-time most common handgun cartridges in the world. There is no known explanation for the name "Deer Gun", but the Deer Gun was intended to be smuggled into [[Vietnam]], attested by the instruction sheet printed in [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]]. It was produced by the American Machine & Foundry Co., but was a ''sanitized'' weapon, meaning it lacked any marking identifying manufacturer or user. Details of the manufacture of insurgency weapons are almost always deliberately obscured by the governments making them, as in the designation of the FP-45 pistol.
=== Terrain ===
[[File:Kunar_August85_with_Enfield.png|right|thumb|159x159px|Afghan Mujahideen]]
Guerrilla warfare is often associated with a rural setting, as was the case for the [[Chinese Red Army]], the [[Afghan mujahideen|mujahadeen]] of [[Afghanistan]], the Ejército Guerrillero de los Pobres (EGP) of [[Guatemala]], the [[Contras]] of [[Nicaragua]], and the [[FMLN]] of [[El Salvador]]. However, guerrillas have successfully operated in urban settings, like in [[Operativo Independencia|Argentina]] and [[Irish Republican Army|Northern Ireland]], relying on a friendly population to provide supplies and intelligence. Rural guerrillas prefer to operate in regions providing plenty of cover and concealment, especially heavily forested and mountainous areas. Urban guerrillas, rather than melting into the mountains and forests, blend into the population and are also dependent on a support base among the people.


Other insurgency weapons may be sanitized versions of traditional [[infantry]] or [[Self-defense#Armed|defensive]] weapons. These may be purpose-made without markings, or they may be standard commercial or military arms that have been altered to remove the manufacturers markings. Due to the covert nature of insurgency weapons, documenting their history is often difficult. Those that can legally be traded on the civilian market, like the [[FP-45 Liberator|Liberator pistol]], will often command high prices; although millions of the pistols were made, few survived the war.
=== Foreign support and sanctuaries ===
Foreign support in the form of soldiers, weapons, sanctuary, or statements of sympathy for the guerrillas is not strictly necessary, but it can greatly increase the chances of an insurgent victory.<ref name="cmeuqr2">Lanning/Cragg, op. cit.</ref> Foreign diplomatic support may bring the guerrilla cause to international attention, putting pressure on local opponents to make concessions, or garnering sympathetic support and material assistance. Foreign sanctuaries can add heavily to guerrilla chances, furnishing weapons, supplies, materials and training bases. Such shelter can benefit from international law, particularly if the sponsoring government is successful in concealing its support and in claiming "plausible denial" for attacks by operatives based in its territory.


These examples are all arms that were either used as insurgency weapons or designed for such use. ''Purpose-built'' weapons were designed from the start to be used primarily for insurgent use, and are fairly crude, very inexpensive, and simple to operate; many were packaged with instructions targeted to speakers of certain languages, or pictorial instructions usable by [[illiterate]] users or speakers of any language. ''Dual-use'' weapons are those that were designed with special allowances for use by insurgent troops. ''Sanitized'' weapons are any arms that have been manufactured or altered to remove markings that indicate the point of origin. IEDs are improvised explosive devices.
== Counter-guerrilla warfare ==
{{See also|Counterinsurgency}}The guerrilla can be difficult to beat, but certain principles of counter-insurgency warfare are well known since the 1950s and 1960s and have been successfully applied. The widely distributed and influential work of Sir [[Robert Grainger Ker Thompson|Robert Thompson]], [[counter-insurgency]] expert of the [[Malayan Emergency]], offers several such guidelines. Thompson's underlying assumption is that of a country minimally committed to the rule of law and better governance. Some governments, however, give such considerations short shrift, and their counter-insurgency operations have involved mass murder, genocide, starvation and the massive spread of terror, torture and execution.<ref>Robert Thompson (1966). ''Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam'', Chatto & Windus, {{ISBN|0-7011-1133-X}}</ref>


[[Image:FP-45 Liberator.jpg|thumb|FP-45 Liberator]]
Some writers on counter-insurgency warfare emphasize the more turbulent nature of today's guerrilla warfare environment, where the clear political goals, parties and structures of such places as Vietnam, Malaysia, or El Salvador are not as prevalent. These writers point to numerous guerrilla conflicts that center around religious, ethnic or even criminal enterprise themes, and that do not lend themselves to the classic "national liberation" template.
The [[FP-45 Liberator]] was a single-shot [[.45 ACP]] [[derringer]]-type pistol, made by the U.S. during [[World War II]]. It was made from stamped steel with an unrifled barrel. The designation "FP" stood for "flare projector", which was apparently an attempt to disguise the use of its intended purpose by obscuring the nature of the project. It was packed with ten rounds of ammunition and was intended to be used for [[assassinating]] enemy soldiers so that their weapons could then be captured and used by the insurgents. The instructions were pictorial, so that the gun could be distributed in any theatre of war, and used even by illiterate operators. The country in which the largest quantity was used was the [[Philippines]].


[[File:TYT1-T-F2-H.jpg|thumb|left|Deer gun]]
The wide availability of the Internet has also cause changes in the tempo and mode of guerrilla operations in such areas as coordination of strikes, leveraging of financing, recruitment, and [[media manipulation]]. While the classic guidelines still apply, today's anti-guerrilla forces need to accept a more disruptive, disorderly and ambiguous mode of operation.
The CIA [[Deer gun]] was a single-shot [[9 mm Luger Parabellum|9×19 mm Parabellum]] pistol, made by the U.S. during the [[Vietnam War]]. It was packaged with three rounds of ammunition in the grip and packed with instructions in a plastic box. If air-dropped into water, the plastic box containing the pistol would float. Like the earlier FP-45 Liberator, it was designed primarily for assassination of enemy soldiers, with the intention that it would be replaced by an enemy soldier's left-over equipment. The instructions for the Deer Gun were pictorial, with text in Vietnamese.
 
Although various submachine guns were manufactured in Northern Ireland with "Round Sections" (Round shaped receivers) and "Square Sections" (Square shaped receivers), the Avenger submachine gun which was used by Loyalist Paramilitaries was considered one of the best designs for its type. The bolts were telescoping with a forward recoil/return spring with in the rear, a heavy coil spring that acts as a buffer increasing accuracy and recoil handling. The barrels were usually found lacking rifling but this can in some cases possibly increase ballistics at close quarters. It used Sten magazines and had the capabilities of adapting [[suppressor]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://amodestpublication.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/|title=08 - May - 2009 -|access-date=18 November 2016}}</ref>
 
During the 1970s–80s, International Ordnance Group of San Antonio, Texas released the [[International Ordnance MP2|MP2]] machine pistol.<ref>[https://thinlineweapons.com/SAI/02.html American Modern Small Arms Part 2]. Thin Line Weapons</ref> It was intended as a more compact alternative to the British Sten gun (although in its components and overall design have nothing directly similar to the STEN), to be used in urban guerrilla actions, to be manufactured cheaply and/or in less-than-well-equipped workshops and distributed to "friendly" undercover forces. Much like the previously mentioned FP-45 "Liberator" pistol of World War 2, it could be discarded during an escape with no substantial loss for the force's arsenal. The MP2 is a blowback-operated weapon that fires from an open bolt with an extremely high rate of fire. A more common weapon of Guatemalan origin is the [[SM-9]].<ref>[https://collections.si.edu/search/results.htm?q=record_ID=nmah_445377&repo=DPLA Eagle Arms Corp M201 Submachinegun] [[Smithsonian Institute]]</ref> Another example is the [[Métral submachine gun]] designed by Gerard Métral intended for manufacture during occupation and undercover circumstances.<ref>The Do-it-Yourself Submachine Gun: Its Homemade, 9mm, Lightweight, Durable And Itll Never Be On Any Import Ban Lists!. Paladin Press (September 1, 1985) English, {{ISBN|0-87364-840-4}}, {{ISBN|978-0-87364-840-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/2900/2932.htm|title=Métral Clandestine SubMachineGun 9x19mm|access-date=18 November 2016}}</ref>
 
A unique example is the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[S4M]] pistol, designed to be used expressly for the purpose of [[assassination]]. It was a simple break-open, two-shot derringer, but the unique features came from its specialized ammunition, designed around a cut-down version of the 7.62mm rounds used in the Soviet AK-47. The casings of the round contained a piston-like plunger between the bullet and the powder that would move forward inside the casing when fired. The piston would push the round down the barrel and plug the end of the casing, completely sealing off any explosive gases in the casing. This, combined with the inherently low-velocity round resulted in a truly silent pistol. The nature of the gun and ammunition led to it being wildly inaccurate outside of point-blank range. To add further confusion and throw possible suspicion away from the assassin, the barrel rifling was designed to affect the bullet in such a way that ballistics experts would not only conclude that the round was fired from an AK-47, but that the round was fired from several hundred feet away. Due to the politically devastating nature inherent in this design, the S4M was kept highly secret.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20061107171615/http://www.world.guns.ru/handguns/hg157-e.htm Modern Firearms:  S-4M silent pistol]</ref> Information on the pistol was not known by western governments until well after the end of the [[Cold War]].{{fact|date=April 2013}}
 
[[File:Hillberg patent 3260009.png|left|thumb|Clip of Hillberg's patent for the 4 barrelled Liberator shotgun design.]]
The [[Winchester Liberator]] is a [[16-gauge]], four-barrelled [[shotgun]], similar to a scaled-up four-shot [[trigger (firearms)|double-action]] [[derringer]]. It was an implementation of the Hillberg Insurgency Weapon design.<ref>[http://guntech.com/hillberg/ GunTech.com] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170922062607/http://www.guntech.com/hillberg/ |date=2017-09-22 }} page on Hillberg Insurgency Weapons, with pictures of Winchester Liberator and Colt Defender prototypes based on Hillberg patents.</ref>[[Robert Hillberg]], the designer, envisioned a weapon that was cheap to manufacture, easy to use, and provided a significant chance of being effective in the hands of someone who had never handled a [[firearm]] before. Pistols and [[submachine gun]]s were eliminated from consideration due to the training required to use them effectively. The shotgun was chosen because it provided a high hit probability. Both Winchester and Colt built prototypes, although the Colt eight-shot design came late in the war and was adapted for the civilian law enforcement market. No known samples were ever produced for military use.
 
{{quote|More specifically, this invention relates to a four barrel break-open firearm which has a minimum number of working parts, is simple to operate even by inexperienced personnel, and is economical to manufacture.|Second paragraph of U.S. Patent 3,260,009, by Robert Hillberg granted 1964}}
==== Dual-use weapons ====
[[Image:A Welrod 9mm pistol on display at the Imperial War Museum in London..jpg|thumb|right|200px|A Welrod 9mm pistol]]
Some purpose-designed insurgency weapons were designed for a dual use–that is for use by both insurgents and conventional soldiers. The [[Welrod]] pistol was a simple, [[bolt-action]] pistol developed by the [[Special Operations Executive|SOE]] for use in [[World War II]]. It was designed for supplying to foreign British-aligned insurgents and for use by covert British forces. The pistol was designed with an integral sound [[suppressor]], and was ideal for killing sentries and other covert work; the bolt-operated action meant that cocking the gun produced almost no noise, and the bulky but efficient suppressor eliminated nearly all of the muzzle blast. Welrod pistols included a magazine that doubled as a hand-grip, and were originally produced with no markings save a serial number.
 
The [[Sten]] was a [[9 mm Luger Parabellum|9×19 mm Parabellum]] [[submachine gun]] manufactured by the [[United Kingdom]] in [[World War II]]. Although not designed as an insurgency weapon, it was designed at a time when Britain had a dire need for weapons and was designed to be easily produced in basic machine shops and use a readily available round, it was therefore the ideal weapon to be produced by resistance groups in occupied territories. Towards the end of the war, the German were in need of weapons and they produced both a version of the Sten, the [[MP 3008]],  to arm the [[Volkssturm]] and near identical copies of the Sten down to makers marks to arm the [[Werwolf]] insurgency force.
===Land mines===
[[Land mine]]s have been used extensively by insurgents throughout [[Cold War]] and post-Cold War conflicts such as the [[First Indochina War]], [[Vietnam War]], [[South African Border War]] and conflicts in [[Iraq]], [[Syria]] and [[Yemen]] by insurgents as a method of area denial, [[psychological warfare]] and [[Attrition warfare|attrition]].
 
During the [[Portuguese Colonial War]], mines and other [[booby trap]]s were one of the principal weapons used by African nationalist insurgents against Portuguese mechanized forces to great effect, who typically patrolled the mostly unpaved roads of their territories using motor vehicles and armored scout cars.<ref>Abbott, Peter and Rodrigues, Manuel, ''Modern African Wars 2: Angola and Mozambique 1961-74'', Osprey Publishing (1998), p. 23: It is estimated that mines planted by insurgents caused about 70 per cent of all Portuguese casualties.</ref> To counter the mine threat, Portuguese engineers commenced the herculean task of tarring the rural road network.<ref>Abbott, Peter and Rodrigues, Manuel, ''Modern African Wars 2: Angola and Mozambique 1961–74'', Osprey Publishing (1998), p. 23</ref> Mine detection was accomplished not only by electronic mine detectors, but also by employing trained soldiers (''picadors'') walking abreast with long probes to detect nonmetallic road mines. Guerrillas in all the various revolutionary movements used a variety of mines, often combining anti-tank with anti-personnel mines to ambush Portuguese formations with devastating results. A common tactic was to plant large anti-vehicle mines in a roadway bordered by obvious cover, such as an irrigation ditch, then seed the ditch with anti-personnel mines. Detonation of the vehicle mine would cause Portuguese troops to deploy and seek cover in the ditch, where the anti-personnel mines would cause further casualties. If the insurgents planned to confront the Portuguese openly, one or two heavy machine guns would be sited to sweep the ditch and other likely areas of cover. Mines used included the [[PMN mine|PMN (Black Widow)]], [[TM-46 mine|TM-46]], and [[POMZ]], amphibious mines such as the [[PDM series of amphibious mines|PDM]], and numerous home-made antipersonnel wood box mines and other nonmetallic explosive devices. The impact of mining operations, in addition to causing casualties, undermined the mobility of Portuguese forces, while diverting troops and equipment from security and offensive operations to convoy protection and mine clearance missions.
 
During the [[Rhodesian Bush War]], the [[Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army]] (ZANLA) tried to paralyse the Rhodesian effort and economy by planting Soviet anti-tank mines on the roads. From 1972 to 1980 there were 2,504 vehicle detonations of land mines (mainly Soviet TM46s), killing 632 people and injuring 4,410. Mining of roads increased 33.7% from 1978 (894 mines or 2.44 mines were detonated or recovered per day) to 1979 (2,089 mines or 5.72 mines a day).<ref>Wood, J. R. T. (24 May 1995). [http://www.rhodesia.nl/wood2.htm "Rhodesian Insurgency"]. See here [http://www.jrtwood.com/bio_publications.asp www.jrtwood.com] for confirmation of authorship.</ref> In response, the Rhodesians co-operated with the South Africans to develop a range of mine-protected vehicles. They began by replacing air in tyres with water which absorbed some of the blast and reduced the heat of the explosion. Initially, they protected the bodies with steel deflector plates, sandbags and mine conveyor belting. Later, purpose-built vehicles with V-shaped blast hulls dispersed the blast, and deaths in such vehicles became unusual events.<ref>Wood, J. R. T. (1995). [http://www.jrtwood.com/article_pookie.asp "The Pookie: a History of the World's first successful Landmine Detector Carrier"]. Durban. Retrieved 19 October 2011.</ref> These developments subsequently led to the South African Hippo, [[Casspir]], Mamba and [[RG-31|Nyala]] wheeled light troop carriers.
 
Land mines were commonly deployed by insurgents during the [[South African Border War]], leading directly to the development of the first dedicated [[MRAP|mine-protected armoured vehicles]] in South Africa. Namibian insurgents used anti-tank mines to throw South African military convoys into disarray before attacking them. In the areas of fighting that covered vast sparsely populated areas of southern [[Angola]] and northern [[Namibia]], it was easy for small groups to infiltrate and lay their mines on roads before escaping again often undetected. The anti-tank mines were most often placed on public roads used by civilian and military vehicles and had a great psychological effect. Mines were often laid in complex arrangements. One tactic was to lay multiple mines on top of each other to increase the blast effect. Another common tactic was to link together several mines placed within a few metres of each other, so that all would detonate when any one was triggered.  To discourage detection and removal efforts, they also laid anti-personnel mines directly parallel to the anti-tank mines. This initially resulted in heavy South African military and police casualties, as the vast distances of road network vulnerable to insurgent sappers every day made comprehensive detection and clearance efforts impractical. The only other viable option was the adoption of mine-protected vehicles which could remain mobile on the roads with little risk to their passengers even if a mine was detonated. South Africa is widely credited with inventing the [[v-hull]], a vee-shaped hull for armoured vehicles which deflects mine blasts away from the passenger compartment.<ref>Camp, Steve; Helmoed-Römer, Heitman (November 2014). ''Surviving the Ride: A pictorial history of South African Manufactured Mine-Protected vehicles''. Pinetown: 30 Degrees South. pp. 19–34. {{ISBN|978-1-928211-17-4}}.</ref><ref>[http://archives.the-monitor.org/index.php/publications/display?url=lm/2004/namibia.html "Namibia"]. ''Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor''. Archived from [https://web.archive.org/web/20200803113024/http://archives.the-monitor.org/index.php/publications/display?url=lm%2F2004%2Fnamibia.html the original] on August 3, 2020. Retrieved March 19, 2019.</ref>
 
During the [[War in Iraq (2013–2017)|Iraqi]],<ref>Cousins, Sophie (February 20, 2015). [http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/02/treacherous-battle-free-iraq-landmines-150209103531036.html "The treacherous battle to free Iraq of landmines"]. Al Jazeera. [https://web.archive.org/web/20171011201525/http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/02/treacherous-battle-free-iraq-landmines-150209103531036.html Archived] from the original on October 11, 2017. Retrieved March 19, 2019.</ref> [[Syrian civil war|Syrian]]<ref>Mines Advisory Group (January 11, 2017). [https://reliefweb.int/report/iraq/new-landmine-emergency-threatens-communities-iraq-and-syria "New landmine emergency threatens communities in Iraq and Syria"]. ''reliefweb.int''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20171011152309/https://reliefweb.int/report/iraq/new-landmine-emergency-threatens-communities-iraq-and-syria Archived] from the original on October 11, 2017. Retrieved March 19, 2019.</ref><ref>[https://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21719830-clearing-syria-and-iraq-unexploded-bombs-and-booby-traps-could-take "Islamic State is losing land but leaving mines behind"]. ''The Economist''. March 30, 2017. [https://web.archive.org/web/20180307161459/https://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21719830-clearing-syria-and-iraq-unexploded-bombs-and-booby-traps-could-take Archived] from the original on March 7, 2018. Retrieved March 19, 2019.</ref> and [[Yemeni civil war (2014–present)|Yemeni]]<ref>[https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/04/20/yemen-houthi-saleh-forces-using-landmines "Yemen: Houthi-Saleh Forces Using Landmines"]. Human Rights Watch. April 20, 2017. [https://web.archive.org/web/20180322202754/https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/04/20/yemen-houthi-saleh-forces-using-landmines Archived] from the original on March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 19, 2019.</ref> civil wars, landmines have been used for both defensive and guerrilla purposes. Anti-tank mines were also used extensively in Cambodia and along the Thai border, many planted by [[Pol Pot]]'s [[Khmer Rouge]] insurgency. Millions of these mines remain in the area, despite clearing efforts. It is estimated that they cause hundreds of deaths annually to civilians.
 
=== Improvised artillery ===
[[File:Improvised-mortars-batey-haosef-1-1.jpg|thumb|Improvised mortars in Batey ha-Osef Museum, Tel Aviv, Israel.]]
 
Improvised and homemade mortars, howitzers and rocket launchers have been used by [[insurgency|insurgent]] groups to attack fortified military installations or to terrorize civilians. They are usually constructed by in a variety of different ways, for example, from heavy steel piping mounted on a steel frame. These weapons may fire factory-made or improvised rounds, and can contain many different explosive fillers and firing mechanisms.
 
"[[Barrack buster]]" is the colloquial name given to several improvised mortars developed in the 1990s by the [[Provisional Irish Republican Army]] (PIRA) during [[The Troubles]]. There was several different versions of these mortars constructed by the PIRA, with the most commonly used being the Mark 15 320mm mortar, which fired a projectile constructed of a gas cylinder filled with 196-220 pounds (89-100 kg) of homemade explosives which was remarked as having the effect of a "flying [[car bomb]]", and was used in several different attacks on [[British Army]] and [[Royal Ulster Constabulary|RUC]] bases. It was also used in attacks on a number of British helicopters, two of which were successfully shot down in 1994; a British Army [[Westland Lynx]] multipurpose helicopter, and an [[RAF]] [[Aérospatiale SA 330 Puma]] transport helicopter. Several other types of improvised mortars were created by the PIRA during the Troubles, including the "Mark 16” or "Projected Recoilless Improvised Grenade", which was used more like a rocket launcher and fired a projectile made of a tin can filled with 600g of [[Semtex]], the "Mark 12” or "Improvised Propelled Grenade" which fired a 40 ounce (1.1 kg) warhead horizontally at security forces bases and vehicles, and the "Mark 10”, which fired a 44–220 pound (20–100 kg) warhead, one of which was responsible for the first intentional killing of a British soldier in a mortar attack. Because of the weight of these mortars, they often had to be transported on vehicles such as tractors and vans.
 
[[Improvised artillery in the Syrian civil war|Improvised artillery]] has been used extensively by various factions of the [[Syrian opposition]] during the [[Syrian civil war]] as a way of making up for deficits in the quantity of military-grade artillery. These "Hell Cannons", as they are known, have been used by various anti-government and Jihadist groups and can fire both improvised and factory-made rounds. The first of these weapons were made in 2012 by the Islamist [[Ahrar al-Shamal Brigade]] in the [[Idlib Governorate]] around the city of [[Binnish]] before the manufacturing was moved to [[Aleppo]] by the [[Free Syrian Army]]'s [[16th Division (Syrian rebel group)|16th Division]] which also appropriated the design. The knowledge spread to other groups in Syria, including the [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant]]. Variants of these cannons have also been developed by rebel forces, including the "Thunder Cannon" made from the body of a 100mm tank gun round, the "Mortar Cannon" made by the FSA's 16th Division that fires factory-made rounds, a compressed air cannon made by [[Ahrar al-Sham]], the "Hellfire Cannon" and a number of multi-barrelled cannons such as the 4-barrelled "Quad Hell Cannon" and the 7-barrelled "Bureji" which is named after a [[Bureij|Palestinian refugee camp in Gaza]].


==See also==
==See also==
Line 231: Line 177:
* {{cite book |last=Boeke |first=Sergei |chapter=Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb |year=2019 |chapter-url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0267 |title=International Relations |publisher=Oxford University Press |doi=10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0267 |isbn=978-0-19-974329-2 |access-date=17 July 2021}}
* {{cite book |last=Boeke |first=Sergei |chapter=Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb |year=2019 |chapter-url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0267 |title=International Relations |publisher=Oxford University Press |doi=10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0267 |isbn=978-0-19-974329-2 |access-date=17 July 2021}}
* {{cite book |last=Boot |first=Max |year=2013 |title=Invisible Armies: An Epic History of Guerrilla Warfare from Ancient Times to the Present| pages=10–11, 55 |publisher=Liveright |isbn=978-0-87140-424-4}}
* {{cite book |last=Boot |first=Max |year=2013 |title=Invisible Armies: An Epic History of Guerrilla Warfare from Ancient Times to the Present| pages=10–11, 55 |publisher=Liveright |isbn=978-0-87140-424-4}}
* {{cite book |last=Chamberlin |first=Paul Thomas |url=https://worldcat.org/oclc/907783262 |title=The global offensive : the United States, the Palestine Liberation Organization, and the making of the post-cold war order |year=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-021782-2 |oclc=907783262}}
* {{cite book |last=Chamberlin |first=Paul Thomas |title=The global offensive : the United States, the Palestine Liberation Organization, and the making of the post-cold war order |year=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-021782-2 |oclc=907783262}}
* {{cite web |last=Child Soldiers International |year=2012 |url=https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=da92581e-7130-40e6-bf3a-a86b944f17dd |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190308184421/https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=da92581e-7130-40e6-bf3a-a86b944f17dd |url-status=usurped |archive-date=2019-03-08 |title=Louder than words: An agenda for action to end state use of child soldiers |access-date=19 January 2018}}
* {{cite web |last=Child Soldiers International |year=2012 |url=https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=da92581e-7130-40e6-bf3a-a86b944f17dd |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190308184421/https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=da92581e-7130-40e6-bf3a-a86b944f17dd |url-status=usurped |archive-date=2019-03-08 |title=Louder than words: An agenda for action to end state use of child soldiers |access-date=19 January 2018}}
* {{cite web |last=Child Soldiers International |year=2016 |url=https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=38e90749-3a76-4441-82dc-bd49f1217599 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190308184421/https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=38e90749-3a76-4441-82dc-bd49f1217599 |url-status=usurped |archive-date=2019-03-08 |title=A law unto themselves? Confronting the recruitment of children by armed groups |access-date=19 January 2018}}
* {{cite web |last=Child Soldiers International |year=2016 |url=https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=38e90749-3a76-4441-82dc-bd49f1217599 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190308184421/https://www.child-soldiers.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=38e90749-3a76-4441-82dc-bd49f1217599 |url-status=usurped |archive-date=2019-03-08 |title=A law unto themselves? Confronting the recruitment of children by armed groups |access-date=19 January 2018}}
* {{cite book |last=Creveld |first=Martin van |title=The Oxford History of Modern War |chapter=Technology and War II:Postmodern War? |editor=Charles Townshend |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2000 | location=New York, USA | pages=[https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town/page/356 356–358] |isbn=978-0-19-285373-8 | chapter-url-access=registration | chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town | url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town/page/356}}
* {{cite book |last=Creveld |first=Martin van |title=The Oxford History of Modern War |chapter=Technology and War II:Postmodern War? |editor=Charles Townshend |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2000 | location=New York, US | pages=[https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town/page/356 356–358] |isbn=978-0-19-285373-8 | chapter-url-access=registration | chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town | url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town/page/356}}
* {{cite book |last=Dennis |first=George |year=1985 |title=Three Byzantine Military Treatises |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |location=Washington, D.C. |page=147}}
* {{cite book |last=Dennis |first=George |year=1985 |title=Three Byzantine Military Treatises |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |location=Washington, D.C. |page=147}}
* {{cite news |last=Detsch |first=J |year=2017 |url=https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/07/pentagon-islamic-state-insurgency-mosul-iraq.html |title=Pentagon braces for Islamic State insurgency after Mosul |work=Al-Monitor |access-date=2018-01-24| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170712041829/http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/07/pentagon-islamic-state-insurgency-mosul-iraq.html |archive-date=2017-07-12 |url-status=dead |language=en-us}}
* {{cite news |last=Detsch |first=J. |year=2017 |url=https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/07/pentagon-islamic-state-insurgency-mosul-iraq.html |title=Pentagon braces for Islamic State insurgency after Mosul |work=Al-Monitor |access-date=2018-01-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170712041829/http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/07/pentagon-islamic-state-insurgency-mosul-iraq.html |archive-date=2017-07-12 |url-status=dead |language=en-us}}
* {{cite journal |last=Drew |first=Allison |year=2015 |title=Visions of liberation: the Algerian war of independence and its South African reverberations |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2014.1000288|journal=Review of African Political Economy |volume=42 |issue=143 |pages=22–43 |doi=10.1080/03056244.2014.1000288|s2cid=144545186|issn=0305-6244|hdl=10.1080/03056244.2014.1000288 |hdl-access=free }}
* {{cite journal |last=Drew |first=Allison |year=2015 |title=Visions of liberation: the Algerian war of independence and its South African reverberations |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2014.1000288|journal=Review of African Political Economy |volume=42 |issue=143 |pages=22–43 |doi=10.1080/03056244.2014.1000288|s2cid=144545186|issn=0305-6244|hdl=10.1080/03056244.2014.1000288 |hdl-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last=Duff |first=James Grant |year=2014 |url= https://play.google.com/store/books/details/James_Grant_Duff_The_History_Of_The_Mahrattas?id=qQZvCwAAQBAJ|publisher= Pickle Partners Publishing |title=The History Of The Mahrattas |isbn=9781782892335 |pages=376}}
* {{cite book |last=Duff |first=James Grant |year=2014 |url= https://play.google.com/store/books/details/James_Grant_Duff_The_History_Of_The_Mahrattas?id=qQZvCwAAQBAJ|publisher= Pickle Partners Publishing |title=The History Of The Mahrattas |isbn=9781782892335 |pages=376}}
* {{cite book |last=Ellis |first=Joseph J. |year=2005 |title= His Excellency : George Washington |publisher=Vintage Books | location=New York |pages=92–109 |isbn=9781400032532 |author-link=Joseph J. Ellis |url=https://archive.org/details/hisexcellencygeo0000elli_k8r3 |via=Internet Archive}}
* {{cite book |last=Ellis |first=Joseph J. |year=2005 |title= His Excellency : George Washington |publisher=Vintage Books | location=New York |pages=92–109 |isbn=9781400032532 |author-link=Joseph J. Ellis |url=https://archive.org/details/hisexcellencygeo0000elli_k8r3 |via=Internet Archive}}
* {{cite web |last=Emmerson |first=B |year=2016 |url=https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N16/285/61/PDF/N1628561.pdf?OpenElement |title=Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism |website=www.un.org |access-date=2018-01-24}}
* {{cite web |last=Emmerson |first=B. |year=2016 |url=https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N16/285/61/PDF/N1628561.pdf?OpenElement |title=Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism |website=www.un.org |access-date=2018-01-24}}
* {{cite web |last=etymonline |year=2023 |title=guerrilla | website=Origin and meaning of guerrilla by Online Etymology Dictionary | url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/guerrilla#etymonline_v_14346 | access-date=14 July 2023}}
* {{cite web |last=etymonline |year=2023 |title=guerrilla | website=Origin and meaning of guerrilla by Online Etymology Dictionary | url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/guerrilla#etymonline_v_14346 | access-date=14 July 2023}}
* {{cite news |last=Ferriter |first=Diarmaid |year=2020 |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/diarmaid-ferriter-bloody-sunday-1920-changed-british-attitudes-to-ireland-1.4411709 |title=Diarmaid Ferriter: Bloody Sunday 1920 changed British attitudes to Ireland |newspaper=The Irish Times}}
* {{cite news |last=Ferriter |first=Diarmaid |year=2020 |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/diarmaid-ferriter-bloody-sunday-1920-changed-british-attitudes-to-ireland-1.4411709 |title=Diarmaid Ferriter: Bloody Sunday 1920 changed British attitudes to Ireland |newspaper=The Irish Times}}
Line 249: Line 195:
|url= https://www.historyireland.com/20th-century-contemporary-history/bloody-sunday-1920-new-evidence/
|url= https://www.historyireland.com/20th-century-contemporary-history/bloody-sunday-1920-new-evidence/
|title= Bloody Sunday 1920: new evidence}}
|title= Bloody Sunday 1920: new evidence}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hooper |first1=Nicholas |last2=Bennett |first2=Matthew |year=1996 |title=Cambridge illustrated atlas, warfare : the Middle Ages, 768-1487 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-44049-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgeillustr00nich/page |via=Internet Archive}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hooper |first1=Nicholas |last2=Bennett |first2=Matthew |year=1996 |title=Cambridge illustrated atlas, warfare : the Middle Ages, 768–1487 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-44049-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgeillustr00nich/page |via=Internet Archive}}
* {{cite journal |last=Horne |first=Alistair |year=2022 |title=A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954–1962. Rev. ed |url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim220070002 |access-date=17 July 2023 |website=The SHAFR Guide Online  |doi=10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim220070002|url-access=subscription }}
* {{cite journal |last=Horne |first=Alistair |year=2022 |title=A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954–1962. Rev. ed |url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim220070002 |access-date=17 July 2023 |website=The SHAFR Guide Online  |doi=10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim220070002|url-access=subscription }}
* {{cite web |last=islamicus |year=2023 |url=http://islamicus.org/abd-el-krim/ |title=ABD EL-KRIM |website=Islamicus |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20230614171503/http://islamicus.org/abd-el-krim/ |archive-date=14 June 2023}}
* {{cite web |last=islamicus |year=2023 |url=http://islamicus.org/abd-el-krim/ |title=ABD EL-KRIM |website=Islamicus |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20230614171503/http://islamicus.org/abd-el-krim/ |archive-date=14 June 2023}}
Line 264: Line 210:
* {{cite web |last=OED |year=2023 |title=guerrilla |url=https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/82246 |website=Oxford English Dictionary}}
* {{cite web |last=OED |year=2023 |title=guerrilla |url=https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/82246 |website=Oxford English Dictionary}}
* {{cite book |last=Pons |first=Frank Moya|year=1998 |title=The Dominican Republic: a national history |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8BfRF9B02kgC |access-date=15 August 2011 |publisher=Markus Wiener Publishers |isbn=978-1-55876-192-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Pons |first=Frank Moya|year=1998 |title=The Dominican Republic: a national history |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8BfRF9B02kgC |access-date=15 August 2011 |publisher=Markus Wiener Publishers |isbn=978-1-55876-192-6}}
* {{cite journal |last=Rowe |first=P |year=2002 |title=Freedom fighters and rebels: the rules of civil war |pmc=1279138 |pmid=11773342 |volume=95 | issue=1 |journal=J R Soc Med |pages=3–4|doi=10.1177/014107680209500102}}
* {{cite journal |last=Rowe |first=P. |year=2002 |title=Freedom fighters and rebels: the rules of civil war |pmc=1279138 |pmid=11773342 |volume=95 |issue=1 |journal=J R Soc Med |pages=3–4 |doi=10.1177/014107680209500102}}
* {{cite book |last=Snyder |first=Craig |year=1999 |title=Contemporary security and strategy}}
* {{cite book |last=Snyder |first=Craig |year=1999 |title=Contemporary security and strategy}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sinclair |first1=Samuel Justin |last2=Antonius |first2=Daniel |year=2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_2oCOWmQfysC&pg=PT30 |title=The Psychology of Terrorism Fears |publisher=Oxford University Press, USA |isbn=978-0-19-538811-4}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sinclair |first1=Samuel Justin |last2=Antonius |first2=Daniel |year=2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_2oCOWmQfysC&pg=PT30 |title=The Psychology of Terrorism Fears |publisher=Oxford University Press, US |isbn=978-0-19-538811-4}}
* {{cite web |last=Tamer |first=Cenk | date=25 September 2017 |url=https://ankasam.org/en/the-differences-between-the-guerrilla-warfare-and-terrorism/ | title=The Differences Between the Guerrilla Warfare and Terrorism}}
* {{cite web |last=Tamer |first=Cenk | date=25 September 2017 |url=https://ankasam.org/en/the-differences-between-the-guerrilla-warfare-and-terrorism/ | title=The Differences Between the Guerrilla Warfare and Terrorism}}
* {{cite journal |last=Tomes |first=Robert |year=2004 |title=Relearning Counterinsurgency Warfare |url=http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/Parameters/Articles/04spring/tomes.pdf |journal=Parameters |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100607224951/http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/Parameters/Articles/04spring/tomes.pdf |archive-date=7 June 2010}}
* {{cite journal |last=Tomes |first=Robert |year=2004 |title=Relearning Counterinsurgency Warfare |url=http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/Parameters/Articles/04spring/tomes.pdf |journal=Parameters |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100607224951/http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/Parameters/Articles/04spring/tomes.pdf |archive-date=7 June 2010}}
Line 277: Line 223:


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* Asprey, Robert. ''War in the Shadows: The Guerrilla in History''
* Asprey, Robert. ''War in the Shadows: The Guerrilla in History''.
* {{cite book |ref=none |title=Encyclopedia of Guerrilla Warfare |type=Hardcover |first1=I. F. W. |last1=Beckett |location=Santa Barbara, California |publisher=Abc-Clio Inc |date=15 September 2009 |isbn=978-0874369298}} {{ISBN|9780874369298}}
* {{cite book |ref=none |title=Encyclopedia of Guerrilla Warfare |type=Hardcover |first1=I. F. W. |last1=Beckett |location=Santa Barbara, California |publisher=Abc-Clio Inc |year= 2009 |isbn=978-0874369298}}
* Derradji Abder-Rahmane, The Algerian Guerrilla Campaign Strategy & Tactics, [[Lewiston, New York]]: [[Edwin Mellen Press]], 1997.
* Derradji Abder-Rahmane, The Algerian Guerrilla Campaign Strategy & Tactics, [[Lewiston, New York]]: [[Edwin Mellen Press]], 1997.
* [[Warren Hinckle|Hinckle, Warren]] (with Steven Chain and David Goldstein): ''Guerrilla-Krieg in USA'' (''Guerrilla war in the USA''), [[Stuttgart]] (Deutsche Verlagsanstalt) 1971. {{ISBN|3-421-01592-9}}
* [[Warren Hinckle|Hinckle, Warren]] (with Steven Chain and David Goldstein): ''Guerrilla-Krieg in USA'' (''Guerrilla war in the USA''), [[Stuttgart]] (Deutsche Verlagsanstalt) 1971. {{ISBN|3-421-01592-9}}.
* Keats, John (1990). ''They Fought Alone''. Time Life. {{ISBN|0-8094-8555-9}}
* Keats, John (1990). ''They Fought Alone''. Time Life. {{ISBN|0-8094-8555-9}}.
* Kreiman, Guillermo (2024). "[[doi:10.1177/00223433231215751|Revolutionary days: Introducing the Latin American Guerrillas Dataset]]". ''Journal of Peace Research''.
* Kreiman, Guillermo (2024). "[[doi:10.1177/00223433231215751|Revolutionary days: Introducing the Latin American Guerrillas Dataset]]". ''Journal of Peace Research''.
* MacDonald, Peter. ''Giap: The Victor in Vietnam''
* MacDonald, Peter. ''Giap: The Victor in Vietnam''.
* {{cite book |ref=none |title=The Heretic: the life and times of Josip Broz-Tito|year=1957|url=https://archive.org/details/FitzroyMacleanTheHereticTheLifeAndTimesbOk.xyz/page/n2}}
* {{cite book |ref=none |title=The Heretic: the life and times of Josip Broz-Tito|year=1957|url=https://archive.org/details/FitzroyMacleanTheHereticTheLifeAndTimesbOk.xyz/page/n2}}
* Oller, John. ''The Swamp Fox: How Francis Marion Saved the American Revolution''. Boston: Da Capo Press, 2016. {{ISBN|978-0-306-82457-9}}.
* Oller, John. ''The Swamp Fox: How Francis Marion Saved the American Revolution''. Boston: Da Capo Press, 2016. {{ISBN|978-0-306-82457-9}}.
* [[William R. Peers|Peers, William R.]]; [[Dean Brelis|Brelis, Dean]]. ''[[Behind the Burma Road|Behind the Burma Road: The Story of America's Most Successful Guerrilla Force]]''. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1963.
* [[William R. Peers|Peers, William R.]]; [[Dean Brelis|Brelis, Dean]]. ''[[Behind the Burma Road|Behind the Burma Road: The Story of America's Most Successful Guerrilla Force]]''. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1963.
* Polack, Peter. ''Guerrilla Warfare; Kings of Revolution'' Casemate,{{ISBN|9781612006758}}.
* Polack, Peter. ''Guerrilla Warfare; Kings of Revolution'' Casemate. {{ISBN|9781612006758}}.
* [[Thomas Powers]], "The War without End" (review of [[Steve Coll]], ''Directorate S: The CIA and America's Secret Wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan'', Penguin, 2018, 757 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXV, no. 7 (19 April 2018), pp.&nbsp;42–43. "Forty-plus years after our failure in [[Vietnam]], the United States is again fighting an endless war in a faraway place against a culture and a people we don't understand for political reasons that make sense in [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], but nowhere else." (p.&nbsp;43.)
* [[Thomas Powers]], "The War without End" (review of [[Steve Coll]], ''Directorate S: The CIA and America's Secret Wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan'', Penguin, 2018, 757 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXV, no. 7 (19 April 2018), pp.&nbsp;42–43. "Forty-plus years after our failure in [[Vietnam]], the United States is again fighting an endless war in a faraway place against a culture and a people we don't understand for political reasons that make sense in [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], but nowhere else." (p.&nbsp;43.)
* Schmidt, LS. 1982. [http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADB068659&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf "American Involvement in the Filipino Resistance on Mindanao During the Japanese Occupation, 1942–1945"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151005012402/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADB068659&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf |date=5 October 2015 }}. M.S. Thesis. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. 274 pp.
* Schmidt, LS. 1982. [http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADB068659&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf "American Involvement in the Filipino Resistance on Mindanao During the Japanese Occupation, 1942–1945"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151005012402/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADB068659&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf |date=5 October 2015 }}. M.S. Thesis. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. 274 pp.
* Sutherland, Daniel E. "Sideshow No Longer: A Historiographical Review of the Guerrilla War." ''Civil War History'' 46.1 (2000): 5–23; American Civil War, 1861–65
* Sutherland, Daniel E. "Sideshow No Longer: A Historiographical Review of the Guerrilla War." ''Civil War History'' 46.1 (2000): 5–23; American Civil War, 1861–65.
* Sutherland, Daniel E. ''A Savage Conflict: The Decisive Role of Guerrillas in the American Civil War'' (U of North Carolina Press, 2009). [https://www.questia.com/library/120077254/a-savage-conflict-the-decisive-role-of-guerrillas online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624040035/https://www.questia.com/library/120077254/a-savage-conflict-the-decisive-role-of-guerrillas |date=24 June 2018 }}
* Sutherland, Daniel E. ''A Savage Conflict: The Decisive Role of Guerrillas in the American Civil War'' (U. of North Carolina Press, 2009). [https://www.questia.com/library/120077254/a-savage-conflict-the-decisive-role-of-guerrillas online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624040035/https://www.questia.com/library/120077254/a-savage-conflict-the-decisive-role-of-guerrillas |date=24 June 2018 }}.
* [[Olivier Weber|Weber, Olivier]], ''Afghan Eternity'', 2002
* [[Olivier Weber|Weber, Olivier]], ''Afghan Eternity'', 2002.


==External links==
==External links==
Line 304: Line 250:
* [https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo46546 Casebook on Insurgency and Revolutionary Warfare] [[United States Army Special Operations Command]] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250305034115/https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo46546/index.htm|date=March 5, 2025}}
* [https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo46546 Casebook on Insurgency and Revolutionary Warfare] [[United States Army Special Operations Command]] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250305034115/https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo46546/index.htm|date=March 5, 2025}}
* [http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/002207.html Counter Insurgency Jungle Warfare School (CIJWS)India] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200428141542/http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/09/14/guerrillas_in_t/|date=April 28, 2020}}
* [http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/002207.html Counter Insurgency Jungle Warfare School (CIJWS)India] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200428141542/http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/09/14/guerrillas_in_t/|date=April 28, 2020}}


{{Weapons}}
{{Weapons}}

Latest revision as of 14:28, 27 May 2026

TemplateStyles' src attribute must not be empty.

File:As Guerrilhas na Guerra Peninsular (Roque Gameiro, Quadros da História de Portugal, 1917).png
Guerrilla warfare during the Peninsular War, by Roque Gameiro, depicting a Portuguese guerrilla ambush against French forces

Template:History of war Guerrilla warfare is a type of unconventional warfare in which small groups of irregular military, such as rebels, partisans, paramilitary personnel or armed civilians, which may include children in the military, use ambushes, sabotage, terrorism, raids, petty warfare or hit-and-run tactics in a rebellion, in a violent conflict, in a war or in a civil war to fight against regular military, police or rival insurgent forces.[1]

Although the term "guerrilla warfare" was coined in the context of the Peninsular War in the 19th century,[2] the tactical methods of guerrilla warfare have long been in use. In the 6th century BC, Sun Tzu proposed the use of guerrilla-style tactics in The Art of War.[3] The 3rd century BC Roman general Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus is also credited with inventing many of the tactics of guerrilla warfare through what is today called the Fabian strategy, and in China Peng Yue is also often regarded as the inventor of guerrilla warfare. Guerrilla warfare has been used by various factions throughout history and is particularly associated with revolutionary movements and popular resistance against invading or occupying armies.

Guerrilla tactics focus on avoiding head-on confrontations with enemy armies, typically due to inferior arms or forces, and instead engage in limited skirmishes with the goal of exhausting adversaries and forcing them to withdraw (see also attrition warfare). Organized guerrilla groups often depend on the support of either the local population or foreign backers who sympathize with the guerrilla group's efforts.[4]

Etymology

The Spanish word guerrilla is the diminutive form of guerra ("war"); hence, "little war". The term became popular during the early-19th century Peninsular War, when, after the defeat of their regular armies, the Spanish and Portuguese people successfully rose against the Napoleonic troops and defeated a highly superior army using the guerrilla strategy in combination with a scorched earth policy and people's war (see also attrition warfare against Napoleon). In correct Spanish usage, a person who is a member of a guerrilla unit is a guerrillero (es) if male, or a guerrillera ([geriˈʎeɾa]) if female. Arthur Wellesley adopted the term "guerrilla" into English from Spanish usage in 1809,[2] to refer to the individual fighters (e.g., "I have recommended to set the Guerrillas to work"), and also (as in Spanish) to denote a group or band of such fighters. However, in most languages guerrilla still denotes a specific style of warfare. The use of the diminutive evokes the differences in number, scale, and scope between the guerrilla army and the formal, professional army of the state.[5]

History

File:Elas vo Ksanti.jpg
Guerrillas of the Greek People's Liberation Army in Xanthi during World War II

Prehistoric tribal warriors presumably employed guerrilla-style tactics against enemy tribes:

Primitive (and guerrilla) warfare consists of war stripped to its essentials: the murder of enemies; the theft or destruction of their sustenance, wealth, and essential resources; and the inducement in them of insecurity and terror. It conducts the basic business of war without recourse to ponderous formations or equipment, complicated maneuvers, strict chains of command, calculated strategies, timetables, or other civilized embellishments.[6]

Evidence of conventional warfare, on the other hand, did not emerge until 3100 BC in Egypt and Mesopotamia. The Chinese general and strategist Sun Tzu, in his The Art of War (6th century BC), became one of the earliest to propose the use of guerrilla warfare.[7] This inspired developments in modern guerrilla warfare.[8]

In the 3rd century BC, Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, called Cunctator ("delayer"), used elements of guerrilla warfare, such as the evasion of battle, the attempt to wear down the enemy, to attack small detachments in an ambush[9] and devised the Fabian strategy, which the Roman Republic used to great effect against Hannibal's army, see also His Excellency : George Washington: the Fabian choice.[10] The Roman general Quintus Sertorius is also noted for his skillful use of guerrilla warfare during his revolt against the Roman Senate. In China, Han dynasty general Peng Yue is often regarded as the inventor of guerrilla warfare due to his use of irregular warfare in the Chu-Han contention to attack Chu convoys and supplies.[11][12]

In the Byzantine Empire, guerrilla warfare was frequently practiced between the eighth through tenth centuries along the eastern frontier with the Umayyad and then Abbasid caliphates. Tactics involved a heavy emphasis on reconnaissance and intelligence, shadowing the enemy, evacuating threatened population centres, and attacking when the enemy dispersed to raid.[13] In the later tenth century this form of warfare was codified in a military manual known by its later Latin name as De velitatione bellica ('On Skirmishing') so it would not be forgotten in the future.[14]

The Normans often made many forays into Wales, where the Welsh used the mountainous region, which the Normans were unfamiliar with, to spring surprise attacks upon them.[15]

Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba successfully employed guerrilla warfare during the Italian Wars, where his Italian lieutenant and successor Prospero Colonna was called Cuntatore after Quintus Fabius Maximus due to their similar tactics. Guerrilla warfare eventually became one of the specialties of the Spanish tercios, including techniques like the camisado.[16]

Since the Enlightenment, ideologies such as nationalism, liberalism, socialism, and religious fundamentalism have played an important role in shaping insurgencies and guerrilla warfare.[17]

In the 17th century, Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, founder of the Maratha Kingdom, pioneered the Shiva sutra or Ganimi Kava (Guerrilla Tactics) to defeat the many times larger and more powerful armies of the Mughal Empire.[18]

During the Dominican Restoration War between 1863 and 1865, Spanish soldiers were deprived of supplies and weapons as insurgents intercepted mule supply trains, captured arms depots containing rifles, cannons, and ammunition, and burned towns they could not hold to deny the Spanish access to supplies and shelter.[19]

The Riffian Berber military leader Abd el-Krim (c.  1883 – 1963) and his father[20] unified the Berber tribes under their control and took up arms against the Spanish and French occupiers during the Rif War in 1920. For the first time in history, tunnel warfare was used alongside modern guerrilla tactics, which caused considerable damage to both the colonial armies in Morocco.[21]

In the early 20th century Michael Collins and Tom Barry both developed many tactical features of guerrilla warfare during the guerrilla phase of the 1919–1921 Irish War of Independence. Collins developed mainly urban guerrilla warfare tactics in Dublin City (the Irish capital). Operations in which small Irish Republican Army (IRA) units (3 to 6 guerrillas) quickly attacked a target and then disappeared into civilian crowds.[22][23] In County Cork, Tom Barry was the commander of the IRA West Cork brigade. Fighting in west Cork was rural, and the IRA fought in much larger units than their comrades in urban areas. These units, called "flying columns",[24] engaged British forces in large battles, usually for between 10–30 minutes.

The Algerian Revolution of 1954 started with a handful of Algerian guerrillas. Primitively armed, the guerrillas fought the French for over eight years. This remains a prototype for modern insurgency and counterinsurgency, terrorism, torture, and asymmetric warfare prevalent throughout the world today.[25] In South Africa, African National Congress (ANC) members studied the Algerian War, prior to the release and apotheosis of Nelson Mandela;[26] in their intifada against Israel, Palestinian fighters have sought to emulate it.[27] Additionally, the tactics of Al-Qaeda closely resemble those of the Algerians.[28]

Theoretical works

The growth of guerrilla warfare was inspired in part by theoretical works on guerrilla warfare, starting with the Manual de Guerra de Guerrillas by Matías Ramón Mella written in the 19th century:

...our troops should...fight while protected by the terrain...using small, mobile guerrilla units to exhaust the enemy...denying them rest so that they only control the terrain under their feet.[29]

Mao Zedong's On Guerrilla Warfare,[30] Che Guevara's Guerrilla Warfare,[31] and Lenin's Guerrilla warfare[32] were all written after the successful revolutions carried out by them in China, Cuba and Russia, respectively. Those texts characterized the tactic of guerrilla warfare as, according to Che Guevara's text, being "used by the side which is supported by a majority but which possesses a much smaller number of arms for use in defense against oppression".[33]

Writings of T. E. Lawrence

T. E. Lawrence, best known as "Lawrence of Arabia", introduced a theory of guerrilla warfare tactics in an article he wrote for the Encyclopædia Britannica published in 1938. In that article, he compared guerrilla fighters to a gas. The fighters disperse in the area of operations more or less randomly. They or their cells occupy a very small intrinsic space in that area, just as gas molecules occupy a very small intrinsic space in a container. The fighters may coalesce into groups for tactical purposes, but their general state is dispersed. They are extremely difficult to "defeat" because they cannot be brought to battle in significant numbers.

Lawrence wrote down some of his theories while ill and unable to fight the Turks in his book Seven Pillars of Wisdom. There, he reviews von Clausewitz and other theorists of war, and finds their writings inapplicable to his situation. The Arabs could not defeat the Turks in pitched battle since they were individualistic warriors not disciplined soldiers used to fight in large formations.

Maoist thought

File:Simple guerrilla organization.svg
Simplified guerrilla warfare organization
File:Dautranh.jpg
The classic "3-phase" Maoist model as adapted by North Vietnam's Ho Chi Minh and Võ Nguyên Giáp.[34]

Mao Zedong argued that guerrilla insurgency, or what he referred to as a "war of revolutionary nature," can be conceived of as part of a continuum.[35] On the low end are small-scale raids, ambushes and attacks. The upper end is composed of a fully integrated political-military strategy, comprising both large and small units, engaging in constantly shifting mobile warfare, both on the low-end "guerrilla" scale, and that of large, mobile formations with modern arms.

The Maoist Theory of People's War divides warfare into three phases. In Phase One, the guerrillas earn the population's support by distributing propaganda and attacking the organs of government. In Phase Two, escalating attacks are launched against the government's military forces and vital institutions. In Phase Three, conventional warfare and fighting are used to seize cities, overthrow the government, and assume control of the country. Mao Zedong's seminal work, On Guerrilla Warfare,[36] has been widely distributed and applied most successfully in Vietnam, by military leader and theorist Võ Nguyên Giáp, whose "Peoples War, Peoples Army"[37] closely follows the Maoist three-phase approachs." Some authors have stressed this interchangeability of phases inherent in this model and guerrilla warfare more generally, especially as applied by the Vietcong guerrilla.[38]

Foco theory

In the 1960s, the Marxist revolutionary Che Guevara developed the foco (Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.) theory of revolution in his book Guerrilla Warfare,[39] based on his experiences during the 1959 Cuban Revolution. This theory was later formalized as "focal-ism" by Régis Debray. Its central principle is that vanguardism by cadres of small, fast-moving paramilitary groups can provide a focus for popular discontent against a sitting regime, and thereby lead a general insurrection. Although the original approach was to mobilize and launch attacks from rural areas, many foco ideas were adapted into urban guerrilla warfare movements.

Nasution's Fundamentals of Guerrilla Warfare

The fullest expression of the Indonesian army's founding doctrines is found in Abdul Haris Nasution's 1953 Fundamentals of Guerrilla Warfare.[40] The work is a mix of reproduced strategic directives from 1947 to 1948, Nasution's theories of guerrilla warfare, his reflections on the post-Japanese occupation period, and the likely crises to come. The work contains similar principles to those espoused or practiced by other theorists and practitioners from Michael Collins in Ireland, T. E. Lawrence in the Middle East and Mao in China in the early Twentieth Century. Nasution willingly shows his influences, frequently referring to some guerrilla activities as "Wingate" actions. The work substantially differs from other theorist/practitioners in that General Nasution was one of the few men to have led both a guerrilla and a counter-guerrilla war. This dual perspective on the realities of "people's war" leaves the work refreshingly free of the perceived hyperbole and ideological leanings of similar revolutionary works from the period.[41]

Strategy and tactics

File:Afrikaner Commandos2.JPG
Boer guerrillas during the Second Boer War in South Africa

Strategic models of guerrilla warfare

Modern insurgencies and other types of warfare may include guerrilla warfare as part of an integrated process, complete with sophisticated doctrine, organization, specialist skills and propaganda capabilities. Guerrillas can operate as small, scattered bands of raiders, but they can also work side by side with regular forces, or combine for far ranging mobile operations in squad, platoon or battalion sizes, or even form conventional units. Based on their level of sophistication and organization, they can shift between all these modes as the situation demands. Successful guerrilla warfare is flexible, not static.

Contemporary Patterns

Some contemporary guerrilla warfare do not follow the Maoist template at all, and might encompass vicious ethnic strife, religious fervor, and numerous small, 'freelance' groups operating independently with little overarching structure. These patterns do not easily fit into phase-driven categories or three-echelon structures as in the People's Wars of Asia.

Some jihadist attacks may be driven by a generalized desire to restore a reputed golden age of earlier times. Ethnic attacks likewise may materialize as bombings, assassinations, or genocidal raids as a matter of avenging perceived slights or insults, rather than a final eventual shift to conventional warfare.[42] Environmental conditions, such as increasing urbanization and easy access to information and media also complicate the contemporary scene, and can include vast networks of peoples bound by religion and ethnicity stretched across the globe.[43]

Tactics

Guerrilla tactics are on intelligence, ambush, deception, sabotage, and espionage, undermining an authority through long, low-intensity confrontation. A guerrilla army may increase the cost of maintaining an occupation or a colonial presence above what the foreign power may wish to bear. Against a local regime, the guerrilla fighters may make governance impossible with terror strikes and sabotage. These tactics are useful in demoralizing an enemy, while raising the morale of the guerrillas.

File:Hogan's Flying Column.gif
Seán Hogan's flying column of the IRA's 3rd Tipperary Brigade, during the Irish War of Independence

Guerrilla operations typically include a variety of strong surprise attacks on transportation routes, individual groups of police or military, installations and structures, economic enterprises, and targeted civilians. Attacking in small groups, using camouflage and often captured weapons of that enemy, the guerrilla force can constantly keep pressure on its foes and diminish its numbers, while still allowing escape with relatively few casualties. The intention of such attacks is political, aiming to demoralize target populations or governments, or goading an overreaction that forces the population to take sides. Examples range from the chopping off of limbs in various internal African rebellions, to the suicide attacks in Israel and Sri Lanka, to sophisticated manoeuvres by Viet Cong and NVA forces against military bases and formations.

File:Ambush-vc274vs11med.jpg
Main Force 274 Regiment versus 11th Armored cav, 1966, Vietnam

Ambushes

Ambushes have been used for as long as guerrilla warfare has been a tactic, and many guerrilla and insurgent groups have used ambushes as a way of defeating superior enemy forces with minimal risk to the insurgents. The ability of an insurgent force to launch an attack against unsuspecting enemy forces and then withdraw in order to avoid engaging superior enemy reinforcements makes ambushes a very useful tactic for guerrilla and insurgent forces.

Assassinations

Insurgent groups have often employed assassination as a tool to further their causes. Assassinations provide several functions for such groups, namely the removal of specific enemies and as propaganda tools to focus the attention of media and politics on their cause. Assassinations were notably used as a tactic of guerilla warfare during the Irish War of Independence, the Troubles, the Basque conflict, the Italian Years of Lead, the Vietnam War, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

File:Vcorganization2.jpg
Simplified view of the Viet Cong organization. Functions such as security or propaganda were duplicated at each level.

Organization

Guerrilla warfare resembles rebellion, yet it is a different concept. Guerrilla organization ranges from local rebel groups of a few dozen guerrillas to thousands of fighters, deploying from cells to regiments. Typically, the organization has political and military wings, to allow the political leaders "plausible denial" for military attacks.[44] The most fully elaborated guerrilla warfare structure is by the Chinese and Vietnamese communists during the revolutionary wars of East and Southeast Asia.[45]

Law and order

Insurgents may attempt to create a parallel system of "justice" with punishment, beatings, and killings of criminals in order to integrate themselves with the populace. Especially in corrupt regimes where there is a deficit of true justice, people's and revolutionary courts aim to legitimize the insurgents as a government in waiting. This is doubly so if insurgents are seen as bringing order in failed regimes, regime weak in control, and situations in which the security forces are widely feared. An example of guerrilla law-and-order is found in the Myanmar Civil War, where groups such as the National Unity Government and Karen National Union established their own systems of education, law enforcement, and civil service.[46][47][48]

Propaganda

File:Nigerien MNJ fighter technical gun.JPG
A Tuareg rebel fighter with a DShK on a technical in northern Niger, 2008

Propaganda is used to sell to the populace the legitimacy, morality and ability of the insurgents, while simultaneously portraying the government and its security forces in a negative light. This propaganda can be of the deed, spectacular acts of assassination, sabotage and violence, relying on the mass media to spread the insurgents message. Older means of disseminating messaging include pamphletting (e.g. Thomas Paine's Common Sense) and through use of the oral tradition of stories, rebel and revolutionary songs. Modern insurgents often use the internet.[49]

Recruitment of sympathizers within the state

Insurgent organizations may recruit members of the government's civil and security forces to their cause or to have their own members join them. In addition to providing intelligence and possibly providing aid, doing so allows insurgent members to gain military training and skills which they would not otherwise be able to access. These members may then serve as a cadre to train other insurgents; those who rise high enough may become agents of influence.

File:Estonian forest brothers relaxing and cleaning their guns after a shooting exercise in Veskiaru, Järva County, Estonia, 1953. (47953893422).jpg
Estonian Forest Brothers relaxing and cleaning their guns after a shooting exercise in Veskiaru, Järva County, Estonian SSR, in 1953

Intelligence

For successful operations, surprise must be achieved by the guerrillas. If the operation has been betrayed or compromised, it is usually called off immediately. Intelligence is also extremely important, and detailed knowledge of the target's dispositions, weaponry and morale is gathered before any attack.

Intelligence can be harvested in several ways. Collaborators and sympathizers will usually provide a steady flow of useful information. Employment or enrollment as a student may be undertaken near the target zone, community organizations may be infiltrated, and even romantic relationships struck up as part of intelligence gathering.[50] Public sources of information are also invaluable to the guerrilla; modern computer access via the World Wide Web makes harvesting and collation of such data relatively easy.[51] The use of on-the-spot reconnaissance is integral to operational planning.

Relationships with civilian populations

Relationships with civilian populations are influenced by whether the guerrillas operate among a hostile or friendly population. A friendly population is of immense importance to guerrilla fighters, providing shelter, supplies, financing, intelligence and recruits, being the key lifeline of any guerrilla movement. Popular mass support in a confined local area or country, however, is not always strictly necessary. Guerrillas and revolutionary groups can still operate using the protection of a friendly regime, drawing supplies, weapons, intelligence, local security and diplomatic cover.

An apathetic or hostile population makes life difficult for guerrilla fighters, and strenuous attempts are usually made to gain their support. These may involve both persuasion and calculated policy of intimidation. Guerrilla forces may characterize a variety of operations as a liberation struggle, but this may or may not result in sufficient support from affected civilians. Other factors, including ethnic and religious hatreds, can make a simple national liberation claim untenable. Whatever the exact mix of persuasion or coercion used by guerrillas, relationships with civil populations are one of the most important factors in their success or failure.[52]

File:6-de-junio-1808.jpg
Spanish guerrilla resistance to the Napoleonic French invasion of Spain at the Battle of Valdepeñas

Terrorism and other crimes against humanity

In some cases, the use of terrorism can be an aspect of guerrilla warfare. Terrorism is used to focus international attention on the guerrilla cause, kill opposition leaders, extort money from targets, intimidate the general population, create economic loss, and keep followers and potential defectors in line. The use of terrorism can also provoke the greater power to launch a disproportionate response, which may alienating a civilian population sympathetic to the terrorist's cause. Such tactics may backfire and cause the civil population to withdraw its support, or to back countervailing forces against the guerrillas.[53]

As an initiation, new recruits, especially forced ones, may be encouraged or forced to participate in atrocities, such as torture, rape and murder, unwilling recruits will be forced to do this against their own communities and families or be killed themselves. The goal of these atrocities is to divorce the new recruit from their previous life and bind them to the insurgency; criminals in their own eyes and in the eyes of society, such recruits will be led to believe that they cannot go back to their previous lives and have no other family other than the insurgency. In order to break the hold the insurgency may hold over such members, the authorities may offer amnesties and pardons for crimes committed.[citation needed]

Insurgents often kidnap and take hostage members of the general public or military for the provision of funding or the release of prisoners. The kidnapping of family members may be used to coerce co-operation, the provision of information, or the right to use property as a safe house. High-value hostages may be taken in order to force the release of captured comrades and as media spectaculars. Creating a fear of kidnapping reinforces a message that the state and its security forces cannot provide protection.[citation needed]

File:Women guerrilla.jpg
Lakhdari, Drif, Bouhired and Bouali. Female Algerian guerrillas of the Algerian War of Independence, c. 1956.

Sabotage

Sabotage against infrastructure, such as power stations, airports and reservoirs at the upper end, and for example electricity pylons, substations, telephone exchanges and railway tracks at the lower end make real to the populace that an insurgency is underway; and if sustained can affect the quality of life of the populace.[citation needed] Sabotage was notably used by a variety of forces during the Second World War, the Malayan Emergency, the Vietnam War, the Soviet-Afghan War, and the Nicaraguan Revolution and reactive Contras Insurgency.

Withdrawal

Guerrillas must plan carefully for withdrawal once an operation has been completed, or if it is going badly. The withdrawal phase is sometimes regarded as the most important part of a planned action, and to get entangled in a lengthy struggle with superior forces is usually fatal to insurgent, terrorist or revolutionary operatives. Withdrawal is usually accomplished using a variety of different routes and methods and may include quickly scouring the area for loose weapons, evidence cleanup, and disguise as peaceful civilians.[54]

Additional factors

Ethical dimensions

Civilians may be attacked or killed as punishment for alleged collaboration, or as a policy of intimidation and coercion. Such attacks are usually sanctioned by the guerrilla leadership with an eye toward the political objectives to be achieved. Attacks may be aimed to weaken civilian morale so that support for the guerrilla's opponents decreases. Civil wars may also involve deliberate attacks against civilians, with both guerrilla groups and organized armies committing atrocities. Ethnic and religious feuds may involve widespread massacres and genocide as competing factions inflict massive violence on targeted civilian population. Guerrillas in wars against foreign powers may direct their attacks at civilians, particularly if foreign forces are too strong to be confronted directly on a long-term basis.

Law of war

Guerrilleros are in danger of not being recognized as lawful combatants because they may not wear a uniform, (to mingle with the local population), or their uniform and distinctive emblems may not be recognized as such by their opponents.

Article 44, sections 3 and 4 of the 1977 First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, "relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts", does recognize combatants who, because of the nature of the conflict, do not wear uniforms as long as they carry their weapons openly during military operations. This gives non-uniformed guerrilleros lawful combatant status against countries that have ratified this convention. However, the same protocol states in Article 37.1.c that "the feigning of civilian, non-combatant status" shall constitute perfidy and is prohibited by the Geneva Conventions. So is the wearing of enemy uniform, as happened in the Boer War.

Terrain

File:Kunar August85 with Enfield.png
Afghan Mujahideen

Guerrilla warfare is often associated with a rural setting, as was the case for the Chinese Red Army, the mujahadeen of Afghanistan, the Ejército Guerrillero de los Pobres (EGP) of Guatemala, the Contras of Nicaragua, and the FMLN of El Salvador. However, guerrillas have successfully operated in urban settings, like in Argentina and Northern Ireland, relying on a friendly population to provide supplies and intelligence. Rural guerrillas prefer to operate in regions providing plenty of cover and concealment, especially heavily forested and mountainous areas. Urban guerrillas, rather than melting into the mountains and forests, blend into the population and are also dependent on a support base among the people.

Foreign support and sanctuaries

Foreign support in the form of soldiers, weapons, sanctuary, or statements of sympathy for the guerrillas is not strictly necessary, but it can greatly increase the chances of an insurgent victory.[55] Foreign diplomatic support may bring the guerrilla cause to international attention, putting pressure on local opponents to make concessions, or garnering sympathetic support and material assistance. Foreign sanctuaries can add heavily to guerrilla chances, furnishing weapons, supplies, materials and training bases. Such shelter can benefit from international law, particularly if the sponsoring government is successful in concealing its support and in claiming "plausible denial" for attacks by operatives based in its territory.

Counter-guerrilla warfare

The guerrilla can be difficult to beat, but certain principles of counter-insurgency warfare are well known since the 1950s and 1960s and have been successfully applied. The widely distributed and influential work of Sir Robert Thompson, counter-insurgency expert of the Malayan Emergency, offers several such guidelines. Thompson's underlying assumption is that of a country minimally committed to the rule of law and better governance. Some governments, however, give such considerations short shrift, and their counter-insurgency operations have involved mass murder, genocide, starvation and the massive spread of terror, torture and execution.[56]

Some writers on counter-insurgency warfare emphasize the more turbulent nature of today's guerrilla warfare environment, where the clear political goals, parties and structures of such places as Vietnam, Malaysia, or El Salvador are not as prevalent. These writers point to numerous guerrilla conflicts that center around religious, ethnic or even criminal enterprise themes, and that do not lend themselves to the classic "national liberation" template.

The wide availability of the Internet has also cause changes in the tempo and mode of guerrilla operations in such areas as coordination of strikes, leveraging of financing, recruitment, and media manipulation. While the classic guidelines still apply, today's anti-guerrilla forces need to accept a more disruptive, disorderly and ambiguous mode of operation.

See also

Notes

  1. Asprey 2023.
  2. 2.0 2.1 OED 2023.
  3. Encyclopædia Britannica, Guerrilla warfare
  4. Guerrilla Warfare (1987), John Pimlott (Author), ISBN 0861242254
  5. etymonline 2023.
  6. Keeley 1997, p. 75.
  7. Leonard 1989, p. 728.
  8. Snyder 1999, p. 46.
  9. Laqueur 1977, p. 7.
  10. Ellis 2005, pp. 99–102.
  11. "彭越,一个历史量身打造的游击战术的鼻祖". www.sohu.com. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  12. "彭越游击战:刘邦反楚的重要推手". Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  13. McMahon 2016, pp. 22–33.
  14. Dennis 1985, p. 147.
  15. Hooper & Bennett 1996, pp. 68–.
  16. Baquer, M. A. (2006). La escuela Hispano-Italiana de Estrategia. Guerra y sociedad en la monarquía hispánica. Vol. 1, 2006, ISBN 84-8483-235-X, págs. 367-380
  17. Hanhimäki, Blumenau & Rapaport 2013, pp. 46–73.
  18. Duff 2014.
  19. "Victory, Stalemate and Defeat During the Spanish Caribbean Insurgencies of 1868–1878" (PDF). pp. 27, 29.
  20. islamicus 2023.
  21. Boot 2013, pp. 10–11, 55.
  22. Ferriter 2020.
  23. historyireland 2003.
  24. Chisholm 1911, p. 585.
  25. Horne 2022.
  26. Drew 2015, pp. 22–43.
  27. Chamberlin 2015.
  28. Boeke 2019.
  29. Kruijt, Tristán & Álvarez 2019.
  30. Mao 1989.
  31. Guevara 2006.
  32. Lenin 1906.
  33. Guevara 2006, p. 16.
  34. Võ Nguyên Giáp, Big Victory, Great Task, Pall Mall Press, London (1968)
  35. On Guerrilla Warfare, by Mao Zedong, 1937, See the text of Mao's work online at www.marxists.org
  36. Mao, op. cit.
  37. Peoples War, Peoples Army, Võ Nguyên Giáp
  38. Dan Jakopovich, "Time Factor in Insurrections", Strategic Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 3, May 2008.
  39. Guevara 2006, p. 13.
  40. Abdul Haris Nasution,Fundamentals of Guerrilla Warfare, Informations Service of the Indonesian Armed Forces, Jakarta, 1953.https://archive.org/details/AbdulHarisNasutionFundamentalsOfGuerrillaWarfare
  41. http://smallwarsjournal.com/mag/docs-temp/59-mcelhatton.pdf Guerrilla Warfare and the Indonesian Strategic Psyche, Small Wars Journal article by Emmet McElhatton
  42. Counterinsurgency Redux – David Kilcullen, 2006, retrieved June 1, 2007
  43. FRANK G. HOFFMAN, "Neo-Classical counterinsurgency?", United States Army War College, Parameters Journal: Summer 2007, pp. 71-87.
  44. "Insurgency & Terrorism: Inside Modern Revolutionary Warfare", Bard E. O'Neill
  45. Inside the VC and the NVA, Michael Lee Lanning and Dan Cragg
  46. Normalizing Abnormalities: Life in Myanmar’s Resistance Zone Helen Li. The Diplomat. September 16, 2024
  47. From war to governance in resistance-liberated areas of Myanmar Aung Thura Ko Ko. November 27, 2024. Asia_Times
  48. War, lack of resources complicate judicial plans in Myanmar rebel zones Kiana Duncan. July 26, 2024. Radio_Free_Asia
  49. The mobile game funding a revolution in Myanmar BBC_News. August 27, 2023. Oliver Slow.
  50. Lanning/Cragg, op. cit.
  51. Terrorist use of web spreads
  52. "Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam", Robert Thompson
  53. "Insurgency & Terrorism: Inside Modern Revolutionary Warfare", Bard E. O'Neill
  54. Mao, op. cit.
  55. Lanning/Cragg, op. cit.
  56. Robert Thompson (1966). Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam, Chatto & Windus, ISBN 0-7011-1133-X

References

Attribution:

Further reading

Template:Weapons