Huldrych Zwingli: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Arsene10
No edit summary
 
imported>Randy Kryn
italics in caption
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|name = Ulrich Zwingli
|name = Ulrich Zwingli
|image = Ulrich-Zwingli-1.jpg
|image = Ulrich-Zwingli-1.jpg
|caption = Portrait by [[Hans Asper]], 1531 ([[Kunstmuseum Winterthur]])
|caption = 1531 portrait
|birth_date = {{Birth date|1484|1|1|df=y}}
|birth_date = {{Birth date|1484|1|1|df=y}}
|birth_place = [[Wildhaus]], [[Princely Abbey of Saint Gall|Protectorate of the Princely Abbey of Saint Gall]]
|birth_place = [[Wildhaus]], Protectorate of the Princely Abbey of Saint Gall
|death_date = {{Death date and age|df=yes|1531|10|11|1484|1|1}}
|death_date = {{Death date and age|df=yes|1531|10|11|1484|1|1}}
|death_place = [[Kappel am Albis|Kappel]], Canton of Zurich, Swiss Confederation
|death_place = [[Kappel am Albis|Kappel]], Canton of Zurich, Swiss Confederation
Line 41: Line 41:
}}
}}


'''Huldrych''' or '''Ulrich Zwingli'''{{efn|{{IPAc-en|lang|'|z|w|ɪ|ŋ|g|l|i}} {{respell|ZWING|glee}};<ref>''[[Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary]]'': [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/zwingli "Zwingli"].</ref> {{IPA|de|ˈhʊldriːç ˈʊlrɪç ˈtsvɪŋli|lang}}}}{{efn|Zwingli's given name was ''[[Ulrich]]'', but he used the latinized spelling ''Huldricus'' or ''Huldrychus Zwinglius''. In his enrolment in the University of Vienna (1500), he still latinised his name as ''Udalricus Zwingling de [[Lichtensteig]]''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Jackson|1900|p=57}}.</ref> His signature at the Marburg Colloquy (1529) was ''Huldrychus Zwinglius''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Bainton|1995|p=251}}.</ref><ref>Schuler, Schultess (eds.), ''Huldrici Zuinglii opera'', 1830, p. 55.</ref> Modern literature uses either ''Ulrich'' (e.g. [[George Richard Potter|Potter]])<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976}}.</ref> or ''Huldrych'' (e.g. Gäbler, Stephens, and Furcha).<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986}}.</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Stephens|1986}}.</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Furcha|1985}}.</ref>}} (1 January 1484&nbsp;– 11 October 1531) was a Swiss [[Christian theologian]], [[musician]], and leader of the [[Reformation in Switzerland]]. Born during a time of emerging Swiss patriotism and increasing criticism of the [[Swiss mercenaries|Swiss mercenary system]], he attended the [[University of Vienna]] and the [[University of Basel]], a scholarly center of [[Renaissance humanism]]. He continued his studies while he served as a pastor in [[Glarus]] and later in [[Einsiedeln]], where he was influenced by the writings of [[Erasmus]]. During his tenures at Basel and Einsiedeln, Zwingli began to familiarize himself with many criticisms Christian institutions were facing regarding their reform guidance and garnered scripture which aimed to address such criticisms.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Visser |first=Dick |date=March 1986 |title=Prophet, Pastor, Protestant: The Work of Huldrych Zwingli after Five Hundred Years. Huldrych Zwingli, E. J. Furcha, and H. Wayne Pipkin; Huldrych, Zwingli. J. V. Pollet |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.2307/2541374 |journal=The Sixteenth Century Journal |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=122–123 |doi=10.2307/2541374 |jstor=2541374 |issn=0361-0160|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
'''Huldrych Zwingli'''{{efn|{{IPAc-en|lang|'|z|w|ɪ|ŋ|g|l|i}} {{respell|ZWING|glee}};<ref>''[[Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary]]'': [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/zwingli "Zwingli"].</ref> {{IPA|de|ˈhʊldriːç ˈʊlrɪç ˈtsvɪŋli|lang}}}} (born '''Ulrich Zwingli''';{{efn|Zwingli's given name was ''[[Ulrich]]'', but he used the latinized spelling ''Huldricus'' or ''Huldrychus Zwinglius''. In his enrolment in the University of Vienna (1500), he still latinised his name as ''Udalricus Zwingling de [[Lichtensteig]]''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Jackson|1900|p=57}}.</ref> His signature at the Marburg Colloquy (1529) was ''Huldrychus Zwinglius''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Bainton|1995|p=251}}.</ref><ref>Schuler, Schultess (eds.), ''Huldrici Zuinglii opera'', 1830, p. 55.</ref> Modern literature uses either ''Ulrich'' (e.g. [[George Richard Potter|Potter]])<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976}}.</ref> or ''Huldrych'' (e.g. Gäbler, Stephens, and Furcha).<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986}}.</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Stephens|1986}}.</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Furcha|1985}}.</ref>}} 1 January 1484&nbsp;– 11 October 1531) was a Swiss [[Christian theologian]], musician, and leader of the [[Reformation in Switzerland]]. Born during a time of emerging Swiss patriotism and increasing criticism of the [[Swiss mercenaries|Swiss mercenary system]], he attended the [[University of Vienna]] and the [[University of Basel]], a scholarly center of [[Renaissance humanism]]. He continued his studies while he served as a pastor in [[Glarus]] and later in [[Einsiedeln]], where he was influenced by the writings of [[Erasmus]]. During his tenures at Basel and Einsiedeln, Zwingli began to familiarize himself with many criticisms Christian institutions were facing regarding their reform guidance and garnered scripture which aimed to address such criticisms.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Visser |first=Dick |date=March 1986 |title=Prophet, Pastor, Protestant: The Work of Huldrych Zwingli after Five Hundred Years. Huldrych Zwingli, E. J. Furcha, and H. Wayne Pipkin; Huldrych, Zwingli. J. V. Pollet |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.2307/2541374 |journal=The Sixteenth Century Journal |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=122–123 |doi=10.2307/2541374 |jstor=2541374 |issn=0361-0160|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


In 1519, Zwingli became the {{lang|de|Leutpriester}} (people's priest) of the [[Grossmünster]] in [[Zurich]] where he began to preach ideas on reform of the Catholic Church.<ref>Lindberg, Carter. ''The European Reformations''. 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, p. 164.</ref> In his first public controversy in 1522, he attacked the [[Fasting and abstinence in the Catholic Church|custom of fasting]] during [[Lent]]. In his publications, he noted corruption in the ecclesiastical hierarchy, promoted [[clerical marriage]], and attacked the use of images in places of worship. Among his most notable contributions to the [[Reformation]] was his [[expository preaching]], starting in 1519, through the [[Gospel of Matthew]], before eventually using [[Biblical exegesis]] to go through the entire New Testament, a radical departure from the [[Catholic mass]].<ref>Lindberg, Carter. ''The European Reformations''. 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 165–166.</ref> In 1525, he introduced a new communion liturgy to replace the [[Mass (liturgy)|Mass]]. He also clashed with the [[Anabaptists]], which resulted in their persecution. Historians have debated whether or not he turned Zurich into a theocracy.<ref>Robert Walton, ''Zwingli's Theocracy'' (Toronto University Press. 1967).</ref>
In 1519, Zwingli became the {{lang|de|Leutpriester}} (people's priest) of the [[Grossmünster]] in [[Zurich]] where he began to preach ideas on reform of the Catholic Church.<ref>Lindberg, Carter. ''The European Reformations''. 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, p. 164.</ref> In his first public controversy in 1522, he attacked the [[Fasting and abstinence in the Catholic Church|custom of fasting]] during [[Lent]]. In his publications, he noted corruption in the ecclesiastical hierarchy, promoted [[clerical marriage]], and attacked the use of images in places of worship. Among his most notable contributions to the [[Reformation]] was his [[expository preaching]], starting in 1519, through the [[Gospel of Matthew]], before eventually using [[Biblical exegesis]] to go through the entire New Testament, a radical departure from the [[Catholic mass]].<ref>Lindberg, Carter. ''The European Reformations''. 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 165–166.</ref> In 1525, he introduced a new communion liturgy to replace the [[Mass (liturgy)|Mass]]. He also clashed with the [[Anabaptists]], which resulted in their persecution. Historians have debated whether or not he turned Zurich into a theocracy.<ref>Robert Walton, ''Zwingli's Theocracy'' (Toronto University Press. 1967).</ref>
Line 50: Line 50:


==Historical context==
==Historical context==
[[File:Historische Karte CH 1515.png|thumb|right|260px|Map of the Swiss Confederation in 1515.<ref>{{cite book|language=de|title=Historische Karte zur territorialen Entwicklung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft 1291-1797|last=Gasser|first= Adolf|url=https://doc.rero.ch/record/307442/?ln=en|location=Aarau|publisher=H.R. Sauerländer|year=1932}}</ref>]]
[[File:Historische Karte CH 1515.png|thumb|right|Map of the Swiss Confederation in 1515.<ref>{{cite book|language=de|title=Historische Karte zur territorialen Entwicklung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft 1291-1797|last=Gasser|first= Adolf|url=https://doc.rero.ch/record/307442/?ln=en|location=Aarau|publisher=H.R. Sauerländer|year=1932}}</ref>]]
The [[Old Swiss Confederacy|Swiss Confederation]] in Huldrych Zwingli's time consisted of thirteen states ([[Cantons of Switzerland|cantons]]) as well as affiliated areas and common lordships. Unlike the modern state of [[Switzerland]], which operates under a federal government, each of the thirteen cantons was nearly independent, conducting its own domestic and foreign affairs. Each canton formed its own alliances within and without the Confederation. This relative independence served as the basis for conflict during the time of the Reformation when the various cantons divided between different confessional camps. Military ambitions gained an additional impetus with the competition to acquire new territory and resources, as seen for example in the [[Old Zurich War]] of 1440–1446.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=1–4}}</ref>
The [[Old Swiss Confederacy|Swiss Confederation]] in Huldrych Zwingli's time consisted of thirteen states ([[Cantons of Switzerland|cantons]]) as well as affiliated areas and common lordships. Unlike the modern state of [[Switzerland]], which operates under a federal government, each of the thirteen cantons was nearly independent, conducting its own domestic and foreign affairs. Each canton formed its own alliances within and without the Confederation. This relative independence served as the basis for conflict during the time of the Reformation when the various cantons divided between different confessional camps. Military ambitions gained an additional impetus with the competition to acquire new territory and resources, as seen for example in the [[Old Zurich War]] of 1440–1446.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=1–4}}</ref>


The wider political environment in Europe during the 15th and 16th centuries was also volatile. For centuries the relationship with the Confederation's powerful neighbour, France, determined the foreign policies of the Swiss. Nominally, the Confederation formed a part of the [[Holy Roman Empire]]. However, through a succession of wars culminating in the [[Swabian War]] in 1499, the Confederation had become ''de facto'' independent. As the two continental powers and minor regional states such as the [[Duchy of Milan]], the [[Duchy of Savoy]], and the [[Papal States]] competed and fought against each other, there were far-reaching political, economic, and social consequences for the Confederation. During this time the [[Swiss mercenaries|mercenary pension system]] became a subject of disagreement. The religious factions of Zwingli's time debated vociferously the merits of sending young Swiss men to fight in foreign wars mainly for the enrichment of the cantonal authorities.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=4–6}}</ref>
The wider political environment in Europe during the 15th and 16th centuries was also volatile. For centuries the relationship with the Confederation's powerful neighbour, France, determined the foreign policies of the Swiss. Nominally, the Confederation formed a part of the [[Holy Roman Empire]]. However, through a succession of wars culminating in the [[Swabian War]] in 1499, the Confederation had become ''de facto'' independent. As the two continental powers and minor regional states such as the [[Duchy of Milan]], the [[Duchy of Savoy]], and the [[Papal States]] competed and fought against each other, there were far-reaching political, economic, and social consequences for the Confederation. During this time the [[Swiss mercenaries|mercenary pension system]] became a subject of disagreement. The religious factions of Zwingli's time debated vociferously the merits of sending young Swiss men to fight in foreign wars mainly for the enrichment of the cantonal authorities.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=4–6}}</ref>


These internal and external factors contributed to the rise of a Confederation national consciousness, in which the term ''fatherland'' ({{langx |la|patria}}) began to take on meaning beyond a reference to an individual canton. At the same time, [[Renaissance humanism]], with its universal values and emphasis on scholarship (as exemplified by [[Erasmus]] (1466–1536), the "prince of humanism"), had taken root in the Confederation. Within this environment, defined by the confluence of Swiss [[patriotism]] and humanism, Zwingli was born in 1484.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=6–7}}</ref>
These internal and external factors contributed to the rise of a Confederation national consciousness, in which the term ''fatherland'' ({{langx |la|patria}}) began to take on meaning beyond a reference to an individual canton. At the same time, [[Renaissance humanism]], with its universal values and emphasis on scholarship (as exemplified by [[Erasmus]], the "prince of humanism"), had taken root in the Confederation. Within this environment, defined by the confluence of Swiss [[patriotism]] and humanism, Zwingli was born in 1484.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=6–7}}</ref>


==Life==
==Life==


===Early years (1484–1518)===
===Early years (1484–1518)===
[[File:Geburtshaus von Huldrych Zwingli.jpg|thumb|right|260px|House where Zwingli was born in [[Wildhaus]] in what is now the [[Canton of St. Gallen]]]]
[[File:Geburtshaus von Huldrych Zwingli.jpg|thumb|right|House where Zwingli was born in [[Wildhaus]] in what is now the [[Canton of St. Gallen]]]]
Huldrych Zwingli was born on 1 January 1484 in [[Wildhaus]], in the [[Toggenburg]] valley of [[Switzerland]], to a family of farmers, the third child of eleven. His father, Ulrich, played a leading role in the administration of the community (''[[Amtmann]]'' or chief local magistrate).<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=6}}</ref> Zwingli's primary schooling was provided by his uncle, Bartholomew, a cleric in [[Weesen, Switzerland|Weesen]], where he probably met [[Katharina von Zimmern]].<ref name="katharina">{{cite web|url=http://frauen-und-reformation.de/?s=bio&id=93|title=Katharina von Zimmern|publisher=frauen-und-reformation.de|access-date=25 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160331123825/http://www.frauen-und-reformation.de/?s=bio&id=93|archive-date=31 March 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> At ten years old, Zwingli was sent to [[Basel]] to obtain his secondary education where he learned [[Latin language|Latin]] under Magistrate Gregory Bünzli. After three years in Basel, he stayed a short time in [[Bern]] with the humanist Henry Wölfflin. The [[Dominican Order|Dominicans]] in Bern tried to persuade Zwingli to join their order and it is possible that he was received as a novice.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|p=24}}; {{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=9}}. Potter mentions this possibility. Gäbler states that Zwingli did not refute later claims by opponents that he had been a monk in Bern.</ref>
Huldrych Zwingli was born on 1 January 1484 in [[Wildhaus]], in the [[Toggenburg]] valley of [[Switzerland]], to a family of farmers, the third child of eleven. His father, Ulrich, played a leading role in the administration of the community (''[[Amtmann]]'' or chief local magistrate).<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=6}}</ref> Zwingli's primary schooling was provided by his uncle, Bartholomew, a cleric in [[Weesen, Switzerland|Weesen]], where he probably met [[Katharina von Zimmern]].<ref name="katharina">{{cite web|url=http://frauen-und-reformation.de/?s=bio&id=93|title=Katharina von Zimmern|publisher=frauen-und-reformation.de|access-date=25 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160331123825/http://www.frauen-und-reformation.de/?s=bio&id=93|archive-date=31 March 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> At ten years old, Zwingli was sent to [[Basel]] to obtain his secondary education where he learned [[Latin language|Latin]] under Magistrate Gregory Bünzli. After three years in Basel, he stayed a short time in [[Bern]] with the humanist Henry Wölfflin. The [[Dominican Order|Dominicans]] in Bern tried to persuade Zwingli to join their order and it is possible that he was received as a novice.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|p=24}}; {{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=9}}. Potter mentions this possibility. Gäbler states that Zwingli did not refute later claims by opponents that he had been a monk in Bern.</ref>


Line 92: Line 92:
Zwingli's theological stance was gradually revealed through his sermons. He attacked moral corruption and in the process he named individuals who were the targets of his denunciations. Monks were accused of indolence and high living. In 1519, Zwingli specifically rejected the [[veneration]] of saints and called for the need to distinguish between their true and fictional accounts. He cast doubts on hellfire, asserted that unbaptised children were not damned, and questioned the power of [[excommunication]]. His attack on the claim that [[Tithe|tithing]] was a divine institution, however, had the greatest theological and social impact. This contradicted the immediate economic interests of the foundation. One of the elderly canons who had supported Zwingli's election, Konrad Hofmann, complained about his sermons in a letter. Some canons supported Hofmann, but the opposition never grew very large. Zwingli insisted that he was not an innovator and that the [[Sola scriptura|sole basis of his teachings was Scripture]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=49–52}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=66}}</ref>
Zwingli's theological stance was gradually revealed through his sermons. He attacked moral corruption and in the process he named individuals who were the targets of his denunciations. Monks were accused of indolence and high living. In 1519, Zwingli specifically rejected the [[veneration]] of saints and called for the need to distinguish between their true and fictional accounts. He cast doubts on hellfire, asserted that unbaptised children were not damned, and questioned the power of [[excommunication]]. His attack on the claim that [[Tithe|tithing]] was a divine institution, however, had the greatest theological and social impact. This contradicted the immediate economic interests of the foundation. One of the elderly canons who had supported Zwingli's election, Konrad Hofmann, complained about his sermons in a letter. Some canons supported Hofmann, but the opposition never grew very large. Zwingli insisted that he was not an innovator and that the [[Sola scriptura|sole basis of his teachings was Scripture]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=49–52}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=66}}</ref>


Within the [[Bishopric of Constance|diocese of Constance]], Bernhardin Sanson was offering a special [[indulgence]] for contributors to the building of [[St. Peter's Basilica|St Peter's]] in Rome. When Sanson arrived at the gates of Zurich at the end of January 1519, parishioners prompted Zwingli with questions. He responded with displeasure that the people were not being properly informed about the conditions of the indulgence and were being induced to part with their money on false pretences. This was over a year after [[Martin Luther]] published his [[Ninety-five theses]] (31 October 1517).<ref>{{Harvnb|Bainton|1995|p=xii}}</ref> The council of Zurich refused Sanson entry into the city. As the authorities in Rome were anxious to contain the fire started by Luther, the Bishop of Constance denied any support of Sanson and he was recalled.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=44, 66–67}}</ref>
Within the [[diocese of Constance]], Bernhardin Sanson was offering a special [[indulgence]] for contributors to the building of [[St. Peter's Basilica|St Peter's]] in Rome. When Sanson arrived at the gates of Zurich at the end of January 1519, parishioners prompted Zwingli with questions. He responded with displeasure that the people were not being properly informed about the conditions of the indulgence and were being induced to part with their money on false pretences. This was over a year after [[Martin Luther]] published his [[Ninety-five Theses]] (31 October 1517).<ref>{{Harvnb|Bainton|1995|p=xii}}</ref> The council of Zurich refused Sanson entry into the city. As the authorities in Rome were anxious to contain the fire started by Luther, the Bishop of Constance denied any support of Sanson and he was recalled.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=44, 66–67}}</ref>


In August 1519, Zurich was struck by an outbreak of the [[Bubonic plague|plague]] during which at least one in four persons died. All of those who could afford it left the city, but Zwingli remained and continued his pastoral duties. In September, he caught the disease and nearly died. He described his preparation for death in a poem, Zwingli's ''Pestlied'', consisting of three parts: the onset of the illness, the closeness to death, and the joy of recovery. The final verses of the first part read:<ref>see e.g. {{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=69–70}}</ref>
In August 1519, Zurich was struck by an outbreak of the [[Bubonic plague|plague]] during which at least one in four persons died. All of those who could afford it left the city, but Zwingli remained and continued his pastoral duties. In September, he caught the disease and nearly died. He described his preparation for death in a poem, Zwingli's ''Pestlied'', consisting of three parts: the onset of the illness, the closeness to death, and the joy of recovery. The final verses of the first part read:<ref>see e.g. {{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=69–70}}</ref>
Line 130: Line 130:


===Zurich disputations (1523)===
===Zurich disputations (1523)===
[[File:Switzerland Zürich Grossmünster Zwingli Münch 1935.jpg|right|thumb|240px|[[Relief]] of Zwingli preaching at the pulpit, [[Otto Münch]], 1935]]
[[File:Switzerland Zürich Grossmünster Zwingli Münch 1935.jpg|right|thumb|[[Relief]] of Zwingli preaching at the pulpit, [[Otto Münch]], 1935]]
The events of 1522 brought no clarification on the issues. Not only did the unrest between Zurich and the bishop continue, tensions were growing among Zurich's Confederation partners in the [[Tagsatzung|Swiss Diet]]. On 22 December, the Diet recommended that its members prohibit the new teachings, a strong indictment directed at Zurich. The city council felt obliged to take the initiative and find its own solution.{{citation needed|date=October 2022}}
The events of 1522 brought no clarification on the issues. Not only did the unrest between Zurich and the bishop continue, tensions were growing among Zurich's Confederation partners in the [[Tagsatzung|Swiss Diet]]. On 22 December, the Diet recommended that its members prohibit the new teachings, a strong indictment directed at Zurich. The city council felt obliged to take the initiative and find its own solution. On 3 January 1523, the Zurich city council invited the clergy of the city and outlying region to a meeting to allow the factions to present their opinions. The bishop was invited to attend or to send a representative. The council would render a decision on who would be allowed to continue to proclaim their views. This meeting, the first Zurich disputation, took place on 29 January 1523.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=63–65}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=97–100}}</ref>
 
====First Disputation====
On 3 January 1523, the Zurich city council invited the clergy of the city and outlying region to a meeting to allow the factions to present their opinions. The bishop was invited to attend or to send a representative. The council would render a decision on who would be allowed to continue to proclaim their views. This meeting, the first Zurich disputation, took place on 29 January 1523.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=63–65}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=97–100}}</ref>


The meeting attracted a large crowd of approximately six hundred participants. The bishop sent a delegation led by his [[vicar general]], [[Johann Faber|Johannes Fabri]]. Zwingli summarised his position in the ''Schlussreden'' (Concluding Statements or the Sixty-seven Articles).<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=99}}</ref><ref>The Sixty-seven Articles are contained in [https://archive.org/details/selectedworksofh00zwin ''Selected Works of Huldreich Zwingli'', Philadelphia, 1901], pp. 111–117. At Internet Archive. Accessed 13 March 2015.</ref> Fabri, who had not envisaged an academic disputation in the manner Zwingli had prepared for,<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|1991|pp=108}}</ref> was forbidden to discuss high theology before laymen, and simply insisted on the necessity of the ecclesiastical authority. The decision of the council was that Zwingli would be allowed to continue his preaching and that all other preachers should teach only in accordance with Scripture.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=67–71}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=100–104}}</ref>
The meeting attracted a large crowd of approximately six hundred participants. The bishop sent a delegation led by his [[vicar general]], [[Johann Faber|Johannes Fabri]]. Zwingli summarised his position in the ''Schlussreden'' (Concluding Statements or the Sixty-seven Articles).<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=99}}</ref><ref>The Sixty-seven Articles are contained in [https://archive.org/details/selectedworksofh00zwin ''Selected Works of Huldreich Zwingli'', Philadelphia, 1901], pp. 111–117. At Internet Archive. Accessed 13 March 2015.</ref> Fabri, who had not envisaged an academic disputation in the manner Zwingli had prepared for,<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|1991|pp=108}}</ref> was forbidden to discuss high theology before laymen, and simply insisted on the necessity of the ecclesiastical authority. The decision of the council was that Zwingli would be allowed to continue his preaching and that all other preachers should teach only in accordance with Scripture.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=67–71}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=100–104}}</ref>


====Second Disputation====
In September 1523, [[Leo Jud]], Zwingli's closest friend and colleague and pastor of [[St. Peter, Zurich|St Peterskirche]], publicly called for the removal of statues of saints and other icons. This led to demonstrations and [[Iconoclasm|iconoclastic]] activities. The city council decided to work out the matter of images in a second disputation. The essence of the [[Mass (liturgy)|Mass]] and its sacrificial character was also included as a subject of discussion. Supporters of the Mass claimed that the Eucharist was a true sacrifice, while Zwingli claimed that it was a commemorative meal. As in the first disputation, an invitation was sent out to the Zurich clergy and the bishop of Constance. This time, however, the lay people of Zurich, the dioceses of [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Chur|Chur]] and Basel, the University of Basel, and the twelve members of the Confederation were also invited. About nine hundred persons attended this meeting, but neither the bishop nor the Confederation sent representatives. The disputation started on 26 October 1523 and lasted two days.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=72, 76–77}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=130–131}}</ref>
In September 1523, [[Leo Jud]], Zwingli's closest friend and colleague and pastor of [[St. Peter, Zurich|St Peterskirche]], publicly called for the removal of statues of saints and other icons. This led to demonstrations and [[Iconoclasm|iconoclastic]] activities. The city council decided to work out the matter of images in a second disputation. The essence of the [[Mass (liturgy)|Mass]] and its sacrificial character was also included as a subject of discussion. Supporters of the Mass claimed that the Eucharist was a true sacrifice, while Zwingli claimed that it was a commemorative meal. As in the first disputation, an invitation was sent out to the Zurich clergy and the bishop of Constance. This time, however, the lay people of Zurich, the dioceses of [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Chur|Chur]] and Basel, the University of Basel, and the twelve members of the Confederation were also invited. About nine hundred persons attended this meeting, but neither the bishop nor the Confederation sent representatives. The disputation started on 26 October 1523 and lasted two days.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=72, 76–77}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=130–131}}</ref>


Zwingli again took the lead in the disputation. His opponent was the aforementioned canon, Konrad Hofmann, who had initially supported Zwingli's election. Also taking part was a group of young men demanding a much faster pace of reformation, who among other things pleaded for replacing [[infant baptism]] with [[Credobaptism|adult baptism]]. This group was led by [[Conrad Grebel]], one of the initiators of the [[Anabaptist]] movement. During the first three days of dispute, although the controversy of images and the mass were discussed, the arguments led to the question of whether the city council or the ecclesiastical government had the authority to decide on these issues.{{citation needed|date=October 2022}}
Zwingli again took the lead in the disputation and his opponent was the canon mentioned above, Konrad Hofmann, who had initially supported Zwingli's election. Also taking part was a radical wing of the Reformation who demanded much faster action. This group was led by Conrad Grebel who would eventually found the Anabaptist movement, a group that placed particular importance on adult baptisms and the rejection of infant baptism. During the first three days, although the controversy of images and the mass were discussed, the arguments led to the question of whether the city council or the ecclesiastical government had the authority to decide on these issues. At this point, Konrad Schmid, a priest from [[Aargau]] and follower of Zwingli, made a pragmatic suggestion. As images were not yet considered to be valueless by everyone, he suggested that pastors preach on this subject under threat of punishment. He believed the opinions of the people would gradually change and the voluntary removal of images would follow. Hence, Schmid rejected the radicals and their iconoclasm, but supported Zwingli's position. In November the council passed ordinances in support of Schmid's motion. Zwingli wrote a booklet on the evangelical duties of a minister, ''Kurze, christliche Einleitung'' (Short Christian Introduction), and the council sent it out to the clergy and the members of the Confederation.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=78–81}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=131–135}}</ref>
 
At this point, Konrad Schmid, a priest from [[Aargau]] and follower of Zwingli, made a pragmatic suggestion. As images were not yet considered to be valueless by everyone, he suggested that pastors preach on this subject under threat of punishment. He believed the opinions of the people would gradually change and the voluntary removal of images would follow. Hence, Schmid rejected the radicals and their iconoclasm, but supported Zwingli's position. In November the council passed ordinances in support of Schmid's motion. Zwingli wrote a booklet on the evangelical duties of a minister, ''Kurze, christliche Einleitung'' (Short Christian Introduction), and the council sent it out to the clergy and the members of the Confederation.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=78–81}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=131–135}}</ref>


===Reformation progresses in Zurich (1524–1525)===
===Reformation progresses in Zurich (1524–1525)===
Huldrych Zwingli was a major figure in the [[Reformation in Switzerland|Swiss Reformation]], advocating for the authority of scripture and the rejection of religious practices not supported by the Bible. His preaching and teachings helped spread Reformation ideas beyond Switzerland and influenced the development of [[Protestantism]] throughout Europe.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Zuerich |url=https://www.zuerich.com/en/visit/culture/huldrych-zwingli. }}{{Dead link|date=February 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>[[File:Zue Grossmuenster 06.jpg|thumb|right|260px|Above the entrance to the Grossmünster doors is inscribed Matthew 11:28, "Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest."]]
Huldrych Zwingli was a major figure in the [[Reformation in Switzerland|Swiss Reformation]], advocating for the authority of scripture and the rejection of religious practices not supported by the Bible. His preaching and teachings helped spread Reformation ideas beyond Switzerland and influenced the development of [[Protestantism]] throughout Europe.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Zuerich |url=https://www.zuerich.com/en/visit/culture/huldrych-zwingli. }}{{Dead link|date=February 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>[[File:Zue Grossmuenster 06.jpg|thumb|right|Above the entrance to the Grossmünster doors is inscribed Matthew 11:28, "Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest."]]
In December 1523, the council set a deadline of [[Pentecost]] in 1524 for a solution to the elimination of the Mass and images. Zwingli gave a formal opinion in ''Vorschlag wegen der Bilder und der Messe'' (Proposal Concerning Images and the Mass). He did not urge an immediate, general abolition. The council decided on the orderly removal of images within Zurich, but rural congregations were granted the right to remove them based on majority vote. The decision on the Mass was postponed.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=81–82}}</ref>
In December 1523, the council set a deadline of [[Pentecost]] in 1524 for a solution to the elimination of the Mass and images. Zwingli gave a formal opinion in ''Vorschlag wegen der Bilder und der Messe'' (Proposal Concerning Images and the Mass). He did not urge an immediate, general abolition. The council decided on the orderly removal of images within Zurich, but rural congregations were granted the right to remove them based on majority vote. The decision on the Mass was postponed.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=81–82}}</ref>


Evidence of the effect of the Reformation was seen in early 1524. [[Candlemas]] was not celebrated, processions of robed clergy ceased, worshippers did not go with palms or relics on [[Palm Sunday]] to the [[Lindenhof]], and [[triptych]]s remained covered and closed after [[Lent]].<ref name="Potter138">{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=138}}</ref> Opposition to the changes came from Konrad Hofmann and his followers, but the council decided in favour of keeping the government mandates. When Hofmann left the city, opposition from pastors hostile to the Reformation broke down. The bishop of Constance tried to intervene in defending the Mass and the veneration of images. Zwingli wrote an official response for the council and the result was the severance of all ties between the city and the diocese.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=82–83}}</ref>
Evidence of the effect of the Reformation was seen in early 1524. [[Candlemas]] was not celebrated, processions of robed clergy ceased, worshippers did not go with palms or relics on [[Palm Sunday]] to the [[Lindenhof]], and [[triptych]]s remained covered and closed after [[Lent]].<ref name="Potter138">{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=138}}</ref> Opposition to the changes came from Konrad Hofmann and his followers, but the council decided in favour of keeping the government mandates. When Hofmann left the city, opposition from pastors hostile to the Reformation broke down. The bishop of Constance tried to intervene in defending the Mass and the veneration of images. Zwingli wrote an official response for the council and the result was the severance of all ties between the city and the diocese.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=82–83}}</ref>


Although the council had hesitated in abolishing the Mass, the decrease in the exercise of traditional piety allowed pastors to be unofficially released from the requirement of celebrating Mass. As individual pastors altered their practices as each saw fit, Zwingli was prompted to address this disorganised situation by designing a communion liturgy in the German language. This was published in ''Aktion oder Brauch des Nachtmahls'' (Act or Custom of the Supper). Shortly before [[Easter]], Zwingli and his closest associates requested the council to cancel the Mass and to introduce the new public order of worship.{{citation needed|date=October 2022}}
Although the council had hesitated in abolishing the Mass, the decrease in the exercise of traditional piety allowed pastors to be unofficially released from the requirement of celebrating Mass. As individual pastors altered their practices as each saw fit, Zwingli was prompted to address this disorganised situation by designing a communion liturgy in the German language. This was published in ''Aktion oder Brauch des Nachtmahls'' (Act or Custom of the Supper). Shortly before [[Easter]], Zwingli and his closest associates requested the council to cancel the Mass and to introduce the new public order of worship. On [[Maundy Thursday]], 13 April 1525, Zwingli celebrated communion under his new liturgy. Wooden cups and plates were used to avoid any outward displays of formality. The congregation sat at set tables to emphasise the meal aspect of the sacrament. The sermon was the focal point of the service and there was no organ music or singing. The importance of the sermon in the worship service was underlined by Zwingli's proposal to limit the celebration of communion to four times a year.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=105–106}}</ref>
 
On [[Maundy Thursday]], 13 April 1525, Zwingli celebrated communion under his new liturgy. Wooden cups and plates were used to avoid any outward displays of formality. The congregation sat at set tables to emphasise the meal aspect of the sacrament. The sermon was the focal point of the service and there was no organ music or singing. The importance of the sermon in the worship service was underlined by Zwingli's proposal to limit the celebration of communion to four times a year.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=105–106}}</ref>


For some time Zwingli had accused [[mendicant]] orders of hypocrisy and demanded their abolition in order to support the truly poor. He suggested the monasteries be changed into hospitals and welfare institutions and incorporate their wealth into a welfare fund. This was done by reorganising the foundations of the Grossmünster and [[Fraumünster]] and pensioning off remaining nuns and monks. The council secularised the church properties (Fraumünster handed over to the city of Zurich by Zwingli's acquaintance [[Katharina von Zimmern]] in 1524) and established new welfare programs for the poor.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wiener |first=James Blake |title=Fraumunster |url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Fraumunster/ |access-date=1 May 2023 |website=World History Encyclopedia |language=en}}</ref>
For some time Zwingli had accused [[mendicant]] orders of hypocrisy and demanded their abolition in order to support the truly poor. He suggested the monasteries be changed into hospitals and welfare institutions and incorporate their wealth into a welfare fund. This was done by reorganising the foundations of the Grossmünster and [[Fraumünster]] and pensioning off remaining nuns and monks. The council secularised the church properties (Fraumünster handed over to the city of Zurich by Zwingli's acquaintance [[Katharina von Zimmern]] in 1524) and established new welfare programs for the poor.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wiener |first=James Blake |title=Fraumunster |url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Fraumunster/ |access-date=1 May 2023 |website=World History Encyclopedia |language=en}}</ref>
Line 160: Line 152:


===Conflict with the Anabaptists (1525–1527)===
===Conflict with the Anabaptists (1525–1527)===
Shortly after the second Zurich disputation, many in the [[Radical Reformation|radical wing of the Reformation]] became convinced that Zwingli was making too many concessions to the Zurich council. They rejected the role of civil government and demanded the immediate establishment of a congregation of the faithful. [[Conrad Grebel]], the leader of the radicals and the emerging Anabaptist movement, spoke disparagingly of Zwingli in private. The Anabaptists in Zurich believed Zwingli's conception of the Reformed faith and the church conflicted their teachings and attempted to claim legislation of Zwingli's early teachings.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Birnbaum |first=Norman |date=1959-04-01 |title=The Zwinglian Reformation in Zurich |url=https://academic.oup.com/past/article-abstract/15/1/27/1499989?redirectedFrom=fulltext |journal=Past & Present |issue=1 |pages=27–47 |doi=10.1093/past/15.1.27 |issn=0031-2746|url-access=subscription }}</ref> On 15 August 1524 the council insisted on the obligation to baptise all newborn infants. Zwingli secretly conferred with Grebel's group and late in 1524, the council called for official discussions. When talks were broken off, Zwingli published ''Wer Ursache gebe zu Aufruhr'' (Whoever Causes Unrest) clarifying the opposing points of view.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=125–126}}</ref> On 17 January 1525 a public debate was held and the council decided in favour of Zwingli. Anyone refusing to have their children baptised was required to leave Zurich. The radicals ignored these measures and on 21 January, they met at the house of the mother of another radical leader, [[Felix Manz]]. Grebel and a third leader, [[George Blaurock]], performed the first recorded Anabaptist [[Credobaptism|adult baptisms]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=177–182}}</ref>
Shortly after the second Zurich disputation, many in the [[Radical Reformation|radical wing of the Reformation]] became convinced that Zwingli was making too many concessions to the Zurich council. They rejected the role of civil government and demanded the immediate establishment of a congregation of the faithful. [[Conrad Grebel]], the leader of the radicals and the emerging Anabaptist movement, spoke disparagingly of Zwingli in private. The Anabaptists in Zurich believed Zwingli's conception of the Reformed faith and the church conflicted their teachings and attempted to claim legislation of Zwingli's early teachings.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Birnbaum |first=Norman |date=1959-04-01 |title=The Zwinglian Reformation in Zurich |url=https://academic.oup.com/past/article-abstract/15/1/27/1499989?redirectedFrom=fulltext |journal=Past & Present |issue=1 |pages=27–47 |doi=10.1093/past/15.1.27 |issn=0031-2746|url-access=subscription }}</ref> On 15 August 1524, the council insisted on the obligation to baptise all newborn infants. Zwingli secretly conferred with Grebel's group and late in 1524, the council called for official discussions. When talks were broken off, Zwingli published ''Wer Ursache gebe zu Aufruhr'' (Whoever Causes Unrest) clarifying the opposing points of view.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=125–126}}</ref> On 17 January 1525, a public debate was held, and the council decided in favour of Zwingli. Anyone refusing to have their children baptised was required to leave Zurich. The radicals ignored these measures and on 21 January, they met at the house of the mother of another radical leader, [[Felix Manz]]. Grebel and a third leader, [[George Blaurock]], performed the first recorded Anabaptist [[Credobaptism|adult baptisms]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=177–182}}</ref>


On 2 February, the council repeated the requirement on the baptism of all babies and some who failed to comply were arrested and fined, Manz and Blaurock among them. Zwingli and Jud interviewed them and more debates were held before the Zurich council. Meanwhile, the new teachings continued to spread to other parts of the Confederation as well as a number of [[Swabia]]n towns. On 6–8 November, the last debate on the subject of baptism took place in the Grossmünster. Grebel, Manz, and Blaurock defended their cause before Zwingli, Jud, and other reformers. There was no serious exchange of views as each side would not move from their positions and the debates degenerated into an uproar, each side shouting abuse at the other.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=183–186}}</ref>
On 2 February, the council repeated the requirement on the baptism of all babies and some who failed to comply were arrested and fined, Manz and Blaurock among them. Zwingli and Jud interviewed them and more debates were held before the Zurich council. Meanwhile, the new teachings continued to spread to other parts of the Confederation as well as a number of [[Swabia]]n towns. On 6–8 November, the last debate on the subject of baptism took place in the Grossmünster. Grebel, Manz, and Blaurock defended their cause before Zwingli, Jud, and other reformers. There was no serious exchange of views as each side would not move from their positions and the debates degenerated into an uproar, each side shouting abuse at the other.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=183–186}}</ref>


The Zurich council decided that no compromise was possible. On 7 March 1526 it released the notorious mandate that no one shall rebaptise another under the penalty of death.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=187}}</ref> Although Zwingli, technically, had nothing to do with the mandate, there is no indication that he disapproved. Felix Manz, who had sworn to leave Zurich and not to baptise any more, had deliberately returned and continued the practice. After he was arrested and tried, he was executed on 5 January 1527 by being drowned in the [[Limmat]]. He was the first Anabaptist martyr; three more were to follow, after which all others either fled or were expelled from Zurich.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=186–188}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Sharp|first=John|title=The Reformation and the Anabaptists: Steps to Reconciliation, 26 June, 2004, Zurich, Switzerland|publisher=Mennonite Historical Committee|date=July 2004|url=http://www.mcusa-archives.org/events/statements_index.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324075102/http://www.mcusa-archives.org/events/statements_index.htm|archive-date=24 March 2012|access-date=23 December 2012}} The descendants of the Zwinglian Reformation, the Reformed Church of Zurich, and the descendants of the Anabaptist movement ([[Amish]], [[Hutterites]], and [[Mennonites]]) held a Reconciliation Conference at the Grossmünster on 26 June 2004. This link includes the conference program, and all statements made at that conference.</ref>
The Zurich council decided that no compromise was possible. On 7 March 1526, it released the notorious mandate that no one shall rebaptise another under the penalty of death.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p=187}}</ref> Although Zwingli, technically, had nothing to do with the mandate, there is no indication that he disapproved. Felix Manz, who had sworn to leave Zurich and not to baptise any more, had deliberately returned and continued the practice. After he was arrested and tried, he was executed on 5 January 1527 by being drowned in the [[Limmat]]. He was the first Anabaptist martyr; three more were to follow, after which all others either fled or were expelled from Zurich.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=186–188}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Sharp|first=John|title=The Reformation and the Anabaptists: Steps to Reconciliation, 26 June, 2004, Zurich, Switzerland|publisher=Mennonite Historical Committee|date=July 2004|url=http://www.mcusa-archives.org/events/statements_index.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324075102/http://www.mcusa-archives.org/events/statements_index.htm|archive-date=24 March 2012|access-date=23 December 2012}} The descendants of the Zwinglian Reformation, the Reformed Church of Zurich, and the descendants of the Anabaptist movement ([[Amish]], [[Hutterites]], and [[Mennonites]]) held a Reconciliation Conference at the Grossmünster on 26 June 2004. This link includes the conference program, and all statements made at that conference.</ref>


===Reformation in the Confederation (1526–1528)===
===Reformation in the Confederation (1526–1528)===
{{further|Swiss Reformation|Bern Disputation}}
{{further|Swiss Reformation|Bern Disputation}}
[[File:Ulrich Zwingli Denkmal - Wasserkirche - Limmatquai 2011-08-10 11-47-50.jpg|right|thumb|180px|Statue of Zwingli in front of the ''[[Wasserkirche]]'' church in Zurich]]
[[File:Ulrich Zwingli Denkmal - Wasserkirche - Limmatquai 2011-08-10 11-47-50.jpg|right|thumb|Statue of Zwingli in front of the ''[[Wasserkirche]]'' church in Zurich]]
On 8 April 1524, five cantons, [[Canton of Lucerne|Lucerne]], [[Canton of Uri|Uri]], [[Canton of Schwyz|Schwyz]], [[Unterwalden]], and [[Canton of Zug|Zug]], formed an alliance, ''die fünf Orte'' (the Five States) to defend themselves from Zwingli's Reformation.<ref name="Potter138" /> They contacted the opponents of Martin Luther including [[John Eck]], who had debated Luther in the [[Leipzig Disputation]] of 1519. Eck offered to dispute Zwingli and he accepted. However, they could not agree on the selection of the judging authority, the location of the debate, and the use of the Swiss Diet as a court. Because of the disagreements, Zwingli decided to boycott the disputation. On 19 May 1526, all the cantons sent delegates to [[Baden, Switzerland|Baden]]. Although Zurich's representatives were present, they did not participate in the sessions. Eck led the Catholic party while the reformers were represented by [[Johannes Oecolampadius]] of Basel, a theologian from [[Württemberg]] who had carried on an extensive and friendly correspondence with Zwingli. While the debate proceeded, Zwingli was kept informed of the proceedings and printed pamphlets giving his opinions. It was of little use as the Diet decided against Zwingli. He was to be banned and his writings were no longer to be distributed. Of the thirteen Confederation members, [[Canton of Glarus|Glarus]], [[Canton of Solothurn|Solothurn]], [[Canton of Fribourg|Fribourg]], and [[Appenzell]] as well as the Five States voted against Zwingli. [[Canton of Bern|Bern]], [[Canton of Basel|Basel]], [[Canton of Schaffhausen|Schaffhausen]], and [[Canton of Zurich|Zurich]] supported him.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=111–113}}</ref>
On 8 April 1524, five cantons&mdash;[[Canton of Lucerne|Lucerne]], [[Canton of Uri|Uri]], [[Canton of Schwyz|Schwyz]], [[Unterwalden]], and [[Canton of Zug|Zug]]&mdash;formed an alliance, ''die fünf Orte'' (the Five States), to defend themselves from Zwingli's Reformation.<ref name="Potter138" /> They contacted the opponents of Martin Luther including [[John Eck]], who had debated Luther in the [[Leipzig Disputation]] of 1519. Eck offered to dispute Zwingli and he accepted. However, they could not agree on the selection of the judging authority, the location of the debate, and the use of the Swiss Diet as a court. Because of the disagreements, Zwingli decided to boycott the disputation. On 19 May 1526, all the cantons sent delegates to [[Baden, Switzerland|Baden]]. Although Zurich's representatives were present, they did not participate in the sessions. Eck led the Catholic party while the reformers were represented by [[Johannes Oecolampadius]] of Basel, a theologian from [[Württemberg]] who had carried on an extensive and friendly correspondence with Zwingli. While the debate proceeded, Zwingli was kept informed of the proceedings and printed pamphlets giving his opinions. It was of little use as the Diet decided against Zwingli. He was to be banned and his writings were no longer to be distributed. Of the thirteen Confederation members, [[Canton of Glarus|Glarus]], [[Canton of Solothurn|Solothurn]], [[Canton of Fribourg|Fribourg]], and [[Appenzell]] as well as the Five States voted against Zwingli. [[Canton of Bern|Bern]], [[Canton of Basel|Basel]], [[Canton of Schaffhausen|Schaffhausen]], and [[Canton of Zurich|Zurich]] supported him.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=111–113}}</ref>


The Baden disputation exposed a deep rift in the Confederation on matters of religion. The Reformation was now emerging in other states. The city of [[St Gallen]], an affiliated state to the Confederation, was led by a reformed mayor, [[Joachim Vadian]], and the city abolished the mass in 1527, just two years after Zurich. In Basel, although Zwingli had a close relationship with Oecolampadius, the government did not officially sanction any reformatory changes until 1 April 1529 when the mass was prohibited. Schaffhausen, which had closely followed Zurich's example, formally adopted the Reformation in September 1529.{{citation needed|date=October 2022}}
The Baden disputation exposed a deep rift in the Confederation on matters of religion. The Reformation was now emerging in other states. The city of [[St Gallen]], an affiliated state to the Confederation, was led by a reformed mayor, [[Joachim Vadian]], and the city abolished the mass in 1527, just two years after Zurich. In Basel, although Zwingli had a close relationship with Oecolampadius, the government did not officially sanction any reformatory changes until 1 April 1529 when the mass was prohibited. Schaffhausen, which had closely followed Zurich's example, formally adopted the Reformation in September 1529.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Burnett |first=Amy Nelson |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_Companion_to_the_Swiss_Reformation/GGpyDAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=schaffhausen+reformation&pg=PA221&printsec=frontcover |title=A Companion to the Swiss Reformation |last2=Campi |first2=Emidio |date=2016-06-21 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-31635-5 |pages=224 |language=en}}</ref>


In the case of Bern, [[Berchtold Haller]], the priest at [[Münster of Berne|St Vincent Münster]], and [[Niklaus Manuel]], the poet, painter, and politician, had campaigned for the reformed cause. But it was only after [[Bern Disputation|another disputation]] that Bern counted itself as a canton of the Reformation. Three hundred and fifty persons participated,<ref name=":4">{{Cite book |last=Sallmann |first=Martin |url=https://brill.com/display/book/9789004316355/B9789004316355-s005.xml |title=A Companion to the Swiss Reformation |date=1 January 2016 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-31635-5 |editor-last=Burnett |editor-first=Amy Nelson |language=en |chapter=The Reformation in Bern |editor-last2=Campi |editor-first2=Emidio}}</ref>{{Rp|page=144|pages=}} including pastors from Bern and other cantons as well as theologians from outside the Confederation such as [[Martin Bucer]] and [[Wolfgang Capito]] from [[Strasbourg]], [[Ambrosius Blarer]] from [[Konstanz|Constance]], and [[Andreas Althamer]] from [[Nuremberg]]. Eck and Fabri refused to attend and the Catholic cantons did not send representatives. The meeting started on 6 January 1528 and lasted nearly three weeks. Zwingli assumed the main burden of defending the Reformation and he preached twice in the Münster. On 7 February 1528 the council decreed that the Reformation be established in Bern.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=113–119}}</ref>
In the case of Bern, [[Berchtold Haller]], the priest at [[Münster of Berne|St Vincent Münster]], and [[Niklaus Manuel]], the poet, painter, and politician, had campaigned for the reformed cause. But it was only after [[Bern Disputation|another disputation]] that Bern counted itself as a canton of the Reformation. Three hundred and fifty persons participated,<ref name=":4">{{Cite book |last=Sallmann |first=Martin |url=https://brill.com/display/book/9789004316355/B9789004316355-s005.xml |title=A Companion to the Swiss Reformation |date=1 January 2016 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-31635-5 |editor-last=Burnett |editor-first=Amy Nelson |language=en |chapter=The Reformation in Bern |editor-last2=Campi |editor-first2=Emidio}}</ref>{{Rp|page=144|pages=}} including pastors from Bern and other cantons as well as theologians from outside the Confederation such as [[Martin Bucer]] and [[Wolfgang Capito]] from [[Strasbourg]], [[Ambrosius Blarer]] from [[Konstanz|Constance]], and [[Andreas Althamer]] from [[Nuremberg]]. Eck and Fabri refused to attend and the Catholic cantons did not send representatives. The meeting started on 6 January 1528 and lasted nearly three weeks. Zwingli assumed the main burden of defending the Reformation and he preached twice in the Münster. On 7 February 1528 the council decreed that the Reformation be established in Bern.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=113–119}}</ref>


===First Kappel War (1529)===
===First Kappel War (1529)===
{{Further|First war of Kappel}}
{{Further|First War of Kappel}}
Even before the [[Bern Disputation]], Zwingli was canvassing for an alliance of reformed cities. Once Bern officially accepted the Reformation, a new alliance, ''das Christliche [[Burgrecht]]'' (the Christian Civic Union) was created.<ref>{{Harvnb|Locher|1981|p=109}}. Potter also translates ''Burgrecht'' as "Civic Union", while {{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|p=119}} translates it as "Fortress Law".</ref> The first meetings were held in Bern between representatives of Bern, Constance, and Zurich on 5–6 January 1528. Other cities, including Basel, [[Biel]], [[Mülhausen]], Schaffhausen, and St Gallen, eventually joined the alliance. The Five (Catholic) States felt encircled and isolated, so they searched for outside allies. After two months of negotiations, the Five States formed ''die Christliche Vereinigung'' (the Christian Alliance) with [[Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor|Ferdinand of Austria]] on 22 April 1529.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=119–120}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=352–355}}</ref>
Even before the [[Bern Disputation]], Zwingli was canvassing for an alliance of reformed cities. Once Bern officially accepted the Reformation, a new alliance, ''das Christliche [[Burgrecht]]'' (the Christian Civic Union) was created.<ref>{{Harvnb|Locher|1981|p=109}}. Potter also translates ''Burgrecht'' as "Civic Union", while {{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|p=119}} translates it as "Fortress Law".</ref> The first meetings were held in Bern between representatives of Bern, Constance, and Zurich on 5–6 January 1528. Other cities, including Basel, [[Biel]], [[Mülhausen]], Schaffhausen, and St Gallen, eventually joined the alliance. The Five (Catholic) States felt encircled and isolated, so they searched for outside allies. After two months of negotiations, the Five States formed ''die Christliche Vereinigung'' (the Christian Alliance) with [[Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor|Ferdinand of Austria]] on 22 April 1529.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=119–120}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp=352–355}}</ref>


Line 186: Line 178:
===Marburg Colloquy (1529)===
===Marburg Colloquy (1529)===
{{Further|Marburg Colloquy}}
{{Further|Marburg Colloquy}}
[[File:Marburger-Religionsgespräch.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Coloured [[woodcut]] of the Marburg Colloquy, anonymous, 1557]]
[[File:Marburger-Religionsgespräch.jpg|thumb|right|Coloured [[woodcut]] of the Marburg Colloquy, anonymous, 1557]]
While Zwingli carried on the political work of the Swiss Reformation, he developed his theological views with his colleagues. The famous disagreement between Luther and Zwingli on the interpretation of the [[eucharist]] originated when [[Andreas Karlstadt]], Luther's former colleague from [[Wittenberg]], published three pamphlets on the Lord's Supper in which Karlstadt rejected the idea of a [[real presence]] in the elements. These pamphlets, published in Basel in 1524, received the approval of Oecolampadius and Zwingli. Luther rejected Karlstadt's arguments and considered Zwingli primarily to be a partisan of Karlstadt. Zwingli began to express his thoughts on the eucharist in several publications including ''de Eucharistia'' (On the Eucharist). Understanding that Christ had ascended to heaven and was sitting at the Father's right hand, Zwingli criticized the idea that Christ's humanity could be in two places at once. Unlike his divinity, Christ's human body was not omnipresent and so could not be in heaven and at the same time be present in the elements. [[Timothy George]], evangelical author, editor of ''[[Christianity Today]]'' and professor of Historical Theology at [[Beeson Divinity School]] at Samford University, has refuted a long-standing misreading of Zwingli that erroneously claimed the Reformer denied all notions of real presence and believed in a memorial view of the Supper, where it was purely symbolic.<ref name="George, Timothy pp. 157-158">George, Timothy. Theology of the Reformers (pp. 157–158). B&H Publishing Group.</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=131–135}}</ref>
While Zwingli carried on the political work of the Swiss Reformation, he developed his theological views with his colleagues. The famous disagreement between Luther and Zwingli on the interpretation of the [[eucharist]] originated when [[Andreas Karlstadt]], Luther's former colleague from [[Wittenberg]], published three pamphlets on the Lord's Supper in which Karlstadt rejected the idea of a [[real presence]] in the elements. These pamphlets, published in Basel in 1524, received the approval of Oecolampadius and Zwingli. Luther rejected Karlstadt's arguments and considered Zwingli primarily to be a partisan of Karlstadt. Zwingli began to express his thoughts on the eucharist in several publications including ''de Eucharistia'' (On the Eucharist). Understanding that Christ had ascended to heaven and was sitting at the Father's right hand, Zwingli criticized the idea that Christ's humanity could be in two places at once. Unlike his divinity, Christ's human body was not omnipresent and so could not be in heaven and at the same time be present in the elements.{{cn|date=October 2025}}


By spring 1527, Luther reacted strongly to Zwingli's views in the treatise ''Dass Diese Worte Christi "Das ist mein Leib etc." noch fest stehen wider die Schwarmgeister'' (That These Words of Christ "This is My Body etc." Still Stand Firm Against the Fanatics). The controversy continued until 1528 when efforts to build bridges between the Lutheran and the Zwinglian views began. [[Martin Butzer|Martin Bucer]] tried to mediate while [[Philip of Hesse]], who wanted to form a political coalition of all Protestant forces, invited the two parties to [[Marburg]] to discuss their differences. This event became known as the [[Marburg Colloquy]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=135–136}}</ref>
By spring 1527, Luther reacted strongly to Zwingli's views in the treatise ''Dass Diese Worte Christi "Das ist mein Leib etc." noch fest stehen wider die Schwarmgeister'' (That These Words of Christ "This is My Body etc." Still Stand Firm Against the Fanatics). The controversy continued until 1528 when efforts to build bridges between the Lutheran and the Zwinglian views began. [[Martin Butzer|Martin Bucer]] tried to mediate while [[Philip of Hesse]], who wanted to form a political coalition of all Protestant forces, invited the two parties to [[Marburg]] to discuss their differences. This event became known as the [[Marburg Colloquy]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=135–136}}</ref>
Line 203: Line 195:
===Politics, confessions, the Kappel Wars and death (1529–1531)===
===Politics, confessions, the Kappel Wars and death (1529–1531)===
{{Further|Second War of Kappel}}
{{Further|Second War of Kappel}}
[[File:Schlacht bei Kappel.jpg|thumb|320px|The [[Second war of Kappel|Battle of Kappel]], 11 October 1531, from ''Chronik'' by [[Johann Stumpf (writer)|Johannes Stumpf]], 1548]]
[[File:Schlacht bei Kappel.jpg|thumb|The [[Second War of Kappel|Battle of Kappel]], 11 October 1531, from ''Chronik'' by [[Johann Stumpf (writer)|Johannes Stumpf]], 1548]]
[[File:Ermordung Zwingli Jauslin.JPG|thumb|"The murder of Zwingli", by [[Karl Jauslin]] (1842–1904).]]
[[File:Ermordung Zwingli Jauslin.JPG|thumb|''The murder of Zwingli'', by [[Karl Jauslin]] (1842–1904).]]
With the failure of the Marburg Colloquy and the split of the Confederation, Zwingli set his goal on an alliance with [[Philip of Hesse]]. He kept up a lively correspondence with Philip. Bern refused to participate, but after a long process, Zurich, Basel, and Strasbourg signed a mutual defence treaty with Philip in November 1530. Zwingli also personally negotiated with France's diplomatic representative, but the two sides were too far apart. France wanted to maintain good relations with the Five States. Approaches to Venice and Milan also failed.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=141–143}}</ref>
With the failure of the Marburg Colloquy and the split of the Confederation, Zwingli set his goal on an alliance with [[Philip of Hesse]]. He kept up a lively correspondence with Philip. Bern refused to participate, but after a long process, Zurich, Basel, and Strasbourg signed a mutual defence treaty with Philip in November 1530. Zwingli also personally negotiated with France's diplomatic representative, but the two sides were too far apart. France wanted to maintain good relations with the Five States. Approaches to Venice and Milan also failed.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=141–143}}</ref>


As Zwingli was working on establishing these political alliances, [[Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor|Charles V]], the Holy Roman Emperor, invited Protestants to the [[Augsburg Diet]] to present their views so that he could make a verdict on the issue of faith. The Lutherans presented the [[Augsburg Confession]]. Under the leadership of Martin Bucer, the cities of Strasbourg, Constance, [[Memmingen]], and [[Lindau]] produced the [[Tetrapolitan Confession]]. This document attempted to take a middle position between the Lutherans and Zwinglians.{{citation needed|date=October 2022}}
As Zwingli was working on establishing these political alliances, [[Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor|Charles V]], the Holy Roman Emperor, invited Protestants to the [[Augsburg Diet]] to present their views so that he could make a verdict on the issue of faith. The Lutherans presented the [[Augsburg Confession]]. Under the leadership of Martin Bucer, the cities of Strasbourg, Constance, [[Memmingen]], and [[Lindau]] produced the [[Tetrapolitan Confession]]. This document attempted to take a middle position between the Lutherans and Zwinglians.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Working for the Unity of the Church |url=https://rts.edu/resources/working-for-the-unity-of-the-church/ |access-date=2025-09-28 |website=Reformed Theological Seminary |language=en-US}}</ref>


It was too late for the ''Burgrecht'' cities to produce a confession of their own. Zwingli then produced his own private confession, ''Fidei ratio'' (Account of Faith) in which he explained his faith in twelve articles conforming to the articles of the [[Apostles' Creed]]. The tone was strongly anti-Catholic as well as anti-Lutheran. The Lutherans did not react officially, but criticised it privately. Zwingli's and Luther's old opponent, [[Johann Eck]], counter-attacked with a publication, ''Refutation of the Articles Zwingli Submitted to the Emperor''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=143–146}}</ref>
It was too late for the ''Burgrecht'' cities to produce a confession of their own. Zwingli then produced his own private confession, ''Fidei ratio'' (Account of Faith) in which he explained his faith in twelve articles conforming to the articles of the [[Apostles' Creed]]. The tone was strongly anti-Catholic as well as anti-Lutheran. The Lutherans did not react officially, but criticised it privately. Zwingli's and Luther's old opponent, [[Johann Eck]], counter-attacked with a publication, ''Refutation of the Articles Zwingli Submitted to the Emperor''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp=143–146}}</ref>
Line 245: Line 237:
Zwingli was a humanist and a scholar with many devoted friends and disciples. He communicated as easily with the ordinary people of his congregation as with rulers such as [[Philip of Hesse]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp= 417–418}}</ref> His reputation as a stern, stolid reformer is counterbalanced by the fact that he had an excellent sense of humour and used satiric fables, spoofing, and puns in his writings.<ref>{{Citation|last1= Schmidt-Clausing|first1= Fritz|last2= West|first2= Jim|title= The Humor of Huldrych Zwingli: The Lighter Side of the Protestant Reformation|location= Lewiston, New York|year= 2007|publisher= Edwin Mellen Press Ltd|isbn= 978-0-7734-5482-8}}.</ref> Zwingli remains as a complex figure of the early Reformation's history, with many drawing comparisons between him and other characters like Martin Luther.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gordon |first=Bruce |date=July 2019 |title=Ulrich Zwinglis Ethik: Stationen—Grundlagen—Konkretionen. Matthias Neugebauer. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2017. 228 pp. €29.90. |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/renaissance-quarterly/article/abs/ulrich-zwinglis-ethik-stationengrundlagenkonkretionen-matthias-neugebauer-zurich-theologischer-verlag-zurich-2017-228-pp-2990/4E64F3F9B46592C1233B4F8212186373 |journal=Renaissance Quarterly |language=en |volume=72 |issue=2 |pages=714–715 |doi=10.1017/rqx.2019.207 |issn=0034-4338|url-access=subscription }}</ref> He was more conscious of social obligations than was Luther, and he genuinely believed that the masses would accept a government guided by God's word.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p= 418}}</ref> He tirelessly promoted assistance to the poor, who he believed should be cared for by a truly Christian community.<ref>{{Harvnb|Wandel|1990|p= 45}}</ref>
Zwingli was a humanist and a scholar with many devoted friends and disciples. He communicated as easily with the ordinary people of his congregation as with rulers such as [[Philip of Hesse]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|pp= 417–418}}</ref> His reputation as a stern, stolid reformer is counterbalanced by the fact that he had an excellent sense of humour and used satiric fables, spoofing, and puns in his writings.<ref>{{Citation|last1= Schmidt-Clausing|first1= Fritz|last2= West|first2= Jim|title= The Humor of Huldrych Zwingli: The Lighter Side of the Protestant Reformation|location= Lewiston, New York|year= 2007|publisher= Edwin Mellen Press Ltd|isbn= 978-0-7734-5482-8}}.</ref> Zwingli remains as a complex figure of the early Reformation's history, with many drawing comparisons between him and other characters like Martin Luther.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gordon |first=Bruce |date=July 2019 |title=Ulrich Zwinglis Ethik: Stationen—Grundlagen—Konkretionen. Matthias Neugebauer. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2017. 228 pp. €29.90. |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/renaissance-quarterly/article/abs/ulrich-zwinglis-ethik-stationengrundlagenkonkretionen-matthias-neugebauer-zurich-theologischer-verlag-zurich-2017-228-pp-2990/4E64F3F9B46592C1233B4F8212186373 |journal=Renaissance Quarterly |language=en |volume=72 |issue=2 |pages=714–715 |doi=10.1017/rqx.2019.207 |issn=0034-4338|url-access=subscription }}</ref> He was more conscious of social obligations than was Luther, and he genuinely believed that the masses would accept a government guided by God's word.<ref>{{Harvnb|Potter|1976|p= 418}}</ref> He tirelessly promoted assistance to the poor, who he believed should be cared for by a truly Christian community.<ref>{{Harvnb|Wandel|1990|p= 45}}</ref>


In December 1531 the Zurich council selected [[Heinrich Bullinger]] (1504–1575) as Zwingli's successor. Bullinger immediately removed any doubts about Zwingli's orthodoxy and defended him as a prophet and a martyr. During Bullinger's ascendancy, the confessional divisions of the Swiss Confederation stabilised.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp= 157–158}}</ref> Bullinger rallied the reformed cities and cantons and helped them to recover from the defeat at Kappel. Zwingli had instituted fundamental reforms; Bullinger consolidated and refined them.<ref>{{Harvnb|Steinmetz|2001|p= 98}}</ref>
In December 1531 the Zurich council selected [[Heinrich Bullinger]] as Zwingli's successor. Bullinger immediately removed any doubts about Zwingli's orthodoxy and defended him as a prophet and a martyr. During Bullinger's ascendancy, the confessional divisions of the Swiss Confederation stabilised.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp= 157–158}}</ref> Bullinger rallied the reformed cities and cantons and helped them to recover from the defeat at Kappel. Zwingli had instituted fundamental reforms; Bullinger consolidated and refined them.<ref>{{Harvnb|Steinmetz|2001|p= 98}}</ref>
[[File:Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-2017a-CHF-20-obverse.png|thumb|220px|Zwingli (right) and [[John Calvin]] on a Swiss [[Coins of the Swiss franc|20 franc]] coin commemorating the 500th anniversary of the Reformation, 2017.]]
[[File:Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-2017a-CHF-20-obverse.png|thumb|Zwingli (right) and [[John Calvin]] on a Swiss [[Coins of the Swiss franc|20 franc]] coin commemorating the 500th anniversary of the Reformation, 2017.]]
Scholars have found it difficult to assess Zwingli's impact on history, for several reasons. There is no consensus on the definition of "[[Zwinglianism]]"; by any definition, Zwinglianism evolved under his successor, Heinrich Bullinger; and research into Zwingli's influence on Bullinger and [[John Calvin]] remains rudimentary.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp= 155–156}}</ref> Bullinger adopted most of Zwingli's points of doctrine. Like Zwingli, he summarised his theology several times, the best-known example being the [[Second Helvetic Confession]] of 1566. Meanwhile, Calvin had taken over the Reformation in [[Geneva]].<ref name="Geneva Before Calvin">{{cite journal|last= Foster|first= Herbert Darling|title= Geneva Before Calvin (1387–1536). The Antecedents of a Puritan State|journal= The American Historical Review|date= Jan 1903 |volume= 8 |issue= 2|pages= 217–240|jstor= 1832923|doi= 10.2307/1832923|hdl= 2027/coo.31924028547531|hdl-access= free}}</ref> Calvin differed with Zwingli on the eucharist and criticised him for regarding it as simply a metaphorical event. In 1549, Bullinger and Calvin succeeded in overcoming the differences in doctrine and produced the ''[[Consensus Tigurinus]]'' (Zurich Consensus). They declared that the eucharist was not just symbolic of the meal, but they also rejected the Lutheran position that the body and blood of Christ is in [[Sacramental union|union with the elements]].<ref name="Furcha 1985 179–195">{{Harvnb|Furcha|1985|pp= 179–195}}, J. C. McLelland, "Meta-Zwingli or Anti-Zwingli? Bullinger and Calvin in Eucharistic Concord"</ref><ref name="Gäbler 1986 158–159">{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp= 158–159}}</ref> It was John Calvin's doctrine of a [[Lord's Supper in Reformed theology|real spiritual presence of Christ in the Eucharist]] that became the doctrine of the Reformed Churches, while Zwingli's view was rejected by the Reformed Churches (though it was adopted by other traditions, such as the [[Plymouth Brethren]]).<ref name="Gerrish2004">{{cite book |last1=Gerrish |first1=Brian |title=The Old Protestantism and the New |date=11 November 2004 |publisher=A&C Black |isbn=978-0-567-08048-6 |pages=112–130 |language=en}}</ref> With this rapprochement, Calvin established his role in the [[Swiss Reformed Church]]es and eventually in the wider world.<ref name="Furcha 1985 179–195"/><ref name="Gäbler 1986 158–159"/>
Scholars have found it difficult to assess Zwingli's impact on history, for several reasons. There is no consensus on the definition of "[[Zwinglianism]]"; by any definition, Zwinglianism evolved under his successor, Heinrich Bullinger; and research into Zwingli's influence on Bullinger and [[John Calvin]] remains rudimentary.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp= 155–156}}</ref> Bullinger adopted most of Zwingli's points of doctrine. Like Zwingli, he summarised his theology several times, the best-known example being the [[Second Helvetic Confession]] of 1566. Meanwhile, Calvin had taken over the Reformation in [[Geneva]].<ref name="Geneva Before Calvin">{{cite journal|last= Foster|first= Herbert Darling|title= Geneva Before Calvin (1387–1536). The Antecedents of a Puritan State|journal= The American Historical Review|date= Jan 1903 |volume= 8 |issue= 2|pages= 217–240|jstor= 1832923|doi= 10.2307/1832923|hdl= 2027/coo.31924028547531|hdl-access= free}}</ref> Calvin differed with Zwingli on the eucharist and criticised him for regarding it as simply a metaphorical event. In 1549, Bullinger and Calvin succeeded in overcoming the differences in doctrine and produced the ''[[Consensus Tigurinus]]'' (Zurich Consensus). They declared that the eucharist was not just symbolic of the meal, but they also rejected the Lutheran position that the body and blood of Christ is in [[Sacramental union|union with the elements]].<ref name="Furcha 1985 179–195">{{Harvnb|Furcha|1985|pp= 179–195}}, J. C. McLelland, "Meta-Zwingli or Anti-Zwingli? Bullinger and Calvin in Eucharistic Concord"</ref><ref name="Gäbler 1986 158–159">{{Harvnb|Gäbler|1986|pp= 158–159}}</ref> It was John Calvin's doctrine of a [[Lord's Supper in Reformed theology|real spiritual presence of Christ in the Eucharist]] that became the doctrine of the Reformed Churches, while Zwingli's view was rejected by the Reformed Churches (though it was adopted by other traditions, such as the [[Plymouth Brethren]]).<ref name="Gerrish2004">{{cite book |last1=Gerrish |first1=Brian |title=The Old Protestantism and the New |date=11 November 2004 |publisher=A&C Black |isbn=978-0-567-08048-6 |pages=112–130 |language=en}}</ref> With this rapprochement, Calvin established his role in the [[Swiss Reformed Church]]es and eventually in the wider world.<ref name="Furcha 1985 179–195"/><ref name="Gäbler 1986 158–159"/>


Line 366: Line 358:


{{Christian History|collapsed}}
{{Christian History|collapsed}}
{{Reformed Christianity navbox}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}