Cosmic microwave background: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Johnjbarton
Ok so may be too many different superlatives in the paragraph, but one of them belongs in the intro as CMB is often described as "faint".
 
imported>Praemonitus
Undid revision 1356734029 by ~2026-32001-24 (talk)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Cosmology|early}}
{{Cosmology|early}}


The '''cosmic microwave background''' ('''CMB''', '''CMBR'''), or '''relic radiation''', is [[microwave radiation]] that fills all space in the [[observable universe]]. With a standard [[optical telescope]], the background space between stars and galaxies is almost completely dark. However, a sufficiently sensitive [[radio telescope]] detects a faint background glow that is almost [[isotropic|uniform]] and is not associated with any star, galaxy, or other [[astronomical object|object]]. This glow is strongest in the [[microwave]] region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Its total energy density exceeds that of all the photons emitted by all the stars in the history of the universe. The accidental [[Discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation|discovery of the CMB]] in 1965 by American radio astronomers [[Arno Allan Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson]] was the culmination of work initiated in the 1940s.
The '''cosmic microwave background''' ('''CMB''', '''CMBR'''), or '''relic radiation''', is [[microwave radiation]] that fills all space in the [[observable universe]]. With a standard [[optical telescope]], the background space between stars and galaxies is almost completely dark. However, a sufficiently sensitive [[radio telescope]] detects a faint background glow that is almost [[isotropic|uniform]] and is not associated with any star, galaxy, or other [[astronomical object|object]]. This glow is strongest in the [[microwave]] region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Its energy density exceeds that of all the photons emitted by all the stars in the history of the universe. The accidental [[Discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation|discovery of the CMB]] in 1964 by American radio astronomers [[Arno Allan Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson]] was the culmination of work initiated in the 1940s.


The CMB is landmark evidence of the [[Big Bang]] [[scientific theory|theory]] for the origin of the universe. In the Big Bang [[cosmological model]]s, during the earliest periods, the universe was filled with an [[Opacity (optics)|opaque]] fog of dense, hot [[Plasma (physics)|plasma]] of [[sub-atomic particle]]s. As the universe expanded, this plasma cooled to the point where protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms of mostly hydrogen. Unlike the plasma, these atoms could not scatter thermal radiation by [[Thomson scattering]], and so the universe became transparent. Known as the [[Recombination (cosmology)|recombination]] epoch, this [[Decoupling (cosmology)|decoupling]] event released [[photons]] to travel freely through space. However, the photons have grown less [[photon energy|energetic]] due to the [[cosmological redshift]] associated with the [[expansion of the universe]]. The ''surface of last scattering'' refers to a shell at the right distance in space so photons are now received that were originally emitted at the time of decoupling.
The CMB is the key experimental evidence of the [[Big Bang]] [[scientific theory|theory]] for the origin of the universe. In the Big Bang [[cosmological model]]s, during the earliest periods, the universe was filled with an [[Opacity (optics)|opaque]] fog of dense, hot [[Plasma (physics)|plasma]] of [[sub-atomic particle]]s. As the universe expanded, this plasma cooled to the point where protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms of mostly hydrogen. Unlike the plasma, these atoms could not scatter thermal radiation by [[Thomson scattering]], and so the universe became transparent. Known as the [[Recombination (cosmology)|recombination epoch]], this [[Decoupling (cosmology)|decoupling event]] released [[photons]] to travel freely through space. However, the photons have grown less [[photon energy|energetic]] due to the [[cosmological redshift]] associated with the [[expansion of the universe]]. The ''surface of last scattering'' refers to a shell at the right distance in space so photons are now received that were originally emitted at the time of decoupling.


The CMB is very smooth and uniform, but maps by sensitive detectors detect small but important temperature variations. Ground and space-based experiments such as [[Cosmic Background Explorer|COBE]], [[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe|WMAP]] and [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck]] have been used to measure these temperature inhomogeneities. The anisotropy structure is influenced by various interactions of matter and photons up to the point of decoupling, which results in a characteristic pattern of tiny ripples that varies with angular scale. The [[Distribution (mathematics)|distribution]] of the anisotropy across the sky has [[frequency]] components that can be represented by a [[power spectrum]] displaying a sequence of peaks and valleys. The peak values of this spectrum hold important information about the physical properties of the early universe: the first peak determines the overall [[curvature of the universe]], while the second and third peak detail the density of normal matter and so-called [[dark matter]], respectively. Extracting fine details from the CMB data can be challenging, since the emission has undergone modification by foreground features such as [[galaxy cluster]]s.
The CMB is very smooth and uniform, but maps by sensitive detectors detect small but important temperature variations. Ground and space-based experiments such as [[Cosmic Background Explorer|COBE]], [[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe|WMAP]] and [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck]] have been used to measure these temperature inhomogeneities. The anisotropy structure is influenced by various interactions of matter and photons up to the point of decoupling, which results in a characteristic pattern of tiny ripples that varies with angular scale. The [[Distribution (mathematics)|distribution]] of the anisotropy across the sky has [[frequency]] components that can be represented by a [[power spectrum]] displaying a sequence of peaks and valleys. The peak values of this spectrum hold important information about the physical properties of the early universe: the first peak determines the overall [[curvature of the universe]], while the second and third peak detail the density of normal matter and so-called [[dark matter]], respectively. Extracting fine details from the CMB data can be challenging, since the emission has undergone modification by foreground features such as [[galaxy clusters]].


==Features==
==Features==
Line 15: Line 15:


The radiation is remarkably uniform across the sky, very unlike the almost point-like structure of stars or clumps of stars in galaxies.<ref name="HuDodelsonReview">{{Cite journal |last1=Hu |first1=Wayne |last2=Dodelson |first2=Scott |date=September 2002 |title=Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies |url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 |journal=Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics |language=en |volume=40 |issue=1 |pages=171–216 |doi=10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 |issn=0066-4146|arxiv=astro-ph/0110414 |bibcode=2002ARA&A..40..171H }}</ref> The radiation is [[isotropic]] to roughly one part in 25,000: the [[root mean square]] variations are just over 100&nbsp;μK,<ref name="PlanckV">
The radiation is remarkably uniform across the sky, very unlike the almost point-like structure of stars or clumps of stars in galaxies.<ref name="HuDodelsonReview">{{Cite journal |last1=Hu |first1=Wayne |last2=Dodelson |first2=Scott |date=September 2002 |title=Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies |url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 |journal=Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics |language=en |volume=40 |issue=1 |pages=171–216 |doi=10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 |issn=0066-4146|arxiv=astro-ph/0110414 |bibcode=2002ARA&A..40..171H }}</ref> The radiation is [[isotropic]] to roughly one part in 25,000: the [[root mean square]] variations are just over 100&nbsp;μK,<ref name="PlanckV">
{{citation | author=The Planck Collaboration | title= Planck 2018 results V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods | journal= Astronomy and Astrophysics |arxiv= 1907.12875 | year= 2020 | volume= 641 |  pages= A5 | doi= 10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 | bibcode= 2020A&A...641A...5P}}</ref> after subtracting a [[dipole]] anisotropy from the [[Doppler shift]] of the background radiation. The latter is caused by the [[peculiar velocity]] of the Sun relative to the [[Comoving distance#Comoving coordinates|comoving]] cosmic rest frame as it moves at 369.82&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.11&nbsp;km/s towards the constellation [[Crater (constellation)|Crater]] near its boundary with the constellation [[Leo (constellation)|Leo]]<ref name="PlanckI">{{citation | author=The Planck Collaboration | title= Planck 2018 results. I. Overview, and the cosmological legacy of Planck | journal= Astronomy and Astrophysics |arxiv=1807.06205| year= 2020 | volume= 641 | pages= A1 | doi= 10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 | bibcode= 2020A&A...641A...1P | s2cid= 119185252 }}</ref> The CMB dipole and [[aberration of light|aberration]] at higher multipoles have been measured, consistent with galactic motion.<ref name="PlanckXXVII">{{citation | author=The Planck Collaboration | title= Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove |arxiv=1303.5087 |bibcode = 2014A&A...571A..27P |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201321556 |volume=571 | issue= 27 |journal=Astronomy |pages=A27| year= 2014| s2cid= 5398329 }}</ref>
{{citation | author=The Planck Collaboration | title= Planck 2018 results V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods | journal= Astronomy and Astrophysics |arxiv= 1907.12875 | year= 2020 | volume= 641 |  pages= A5 | doi= 10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 | bibcode= 2020A&A...641A...5P}}</ref> after subtracting a [[dipole]] anisotropy from the [[Doppler shift]] of the background radiation. The latter is caused by the [[peculiar velocity]] of the Sun relative to the [[Comoving distance#Comoving coordinates|comoving]] cosmic rest frame as it moves at 369.82&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.11&nbsp;km/s towards the constellation [[Crater (constellation)|Crater]] near its boundary with the constellation [[Leo (constellation)|Leo]].<ref name="PlanckI">{{citation | author=The Planck Collaboration | title= Planck 2018 results. I. Overview, and the cosmological legacy of Planck | journal= Astronomy and Astrophysics |arxiv=1807.06205| year= 2020 | volume= 641 | pages= A1 | doi= 10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 | bibcode= 2020A&A...641A...1P | s2cid= 119185252 }}</ref> The CMB dipole and [[aberration of light|aberration]] at higher multipoles have been measured, consistent with galactic motion.<ref name="PlanckXXVII">{{citation | author=The Planck Collaboration | title= Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove |arxiv=1303.5087 |bibcode = 2014A&A...571A..27P |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201321556 |volume=571 | issue= 27 |journal=Astronomy |pages=A27| year= 2014| s2cid= 5398329 }}</ref>
Despite the very small degree of anisotropy in the CMB, many aspects can be measured with high precision and such measurements are critical for cosmological theories.<ref name="HuDodelsonReview"/>
Despite the very small degree of anisotropy in the CMB, many aspects can be measured with high precision and such measurements are critical for cosmological theories.<ref name="HuDodelsonReview"/>


Line 24: Line 24:
Other than the temperature and polarization anisotropy, the CMB frequency spectrum is expected to feature tiny departures from the black-body law known as [[Cosmic microwave background spectral distortions|spectral distortions]]. These are also at the focus of an active research effort with the hope of a first measurement within the forthcoming decades, as they contain a wealth of information about the primordial universe and the formation of structures at late time.<ref name="Voyage2050">{{cite journal|last=Chluba|first=J.|display-authors=etal|title=New Horizons in Cosmology with Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background|journal=Voyage 2050 Proposals|year=2021|volume=51|issue=3|pages=1515–1554|doi=10.1007/s10686-021-09729-5|arxiv=1909.01593|bibcode=2021ExA....51.1515C|s2cid=202539910|url=https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/1866264/3219248/ChlubaJ_Voyage-2050-SDWP-main.pdf/b91871ad-75c4-5b75-3300-049682255629?t=1565184628801}}</ref>
Other than the temperature and polarization anisotropy, the CMB frequency spectrum is expected to feature tiny departures from the black-body law known as [[Cosmic microwave background spectral distortions|spectral distortions]]. These are also at the focus of an active research effort with the hope of a first measurement within the forthcoming decades, as they contain a wealth of information about the primordial universe and the formation of structures at late time.<ref name="Voyage2050">{{cite journal|last=Chluba|first=J.|display-authors=etal|title=New Horizons in Cosmology with Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background|journal=Voyage 2050 Proposals|year=2021|volume=51|issue=3|pages=1515–1554|doi=10.1007/s10686-021-09729-5|arxiv=1909.01593|bibcode=2021ExA....51.1515C|s2cid=202539910|url=https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/1866264/3219248/ChlubaJ_Voyage-2050-SDWP-main.pdf/b91871ad-75c4-5b75-3300-049682255629?t=1565184628801}}</ref>


The CMB contains the vast majority of photons in the universe by a factor of 400 to 1;<ref name=HistoryOfAlternatives>{{Cite journal |last1=Ćirković |first1=Milan M. |last2=Perović |first2=Slobodan |date=2018-05-01 |title=Alternative explanations of the cosmic microwave background: A historical and an epistemological perspective |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219816302039 |journal=Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics |volume=62 |pages=1–18 |doi=10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.04.005 |arxiv=1705.07721 |bibcode=2018SHPMP..62....1C |issn=1355-2198}}</ref>{{rp|5}} the number density of photons in the CMB is one billion times  (10<sup>9</sup>) the number density of matter in the universe. The total energy density of the CMB exceeds that of all the photons emitted by all the stars in the history of the universe.<ref name=Ryden-2016>{{Cite book |last=Ryden |first=Barbara |title=Introduction to cosmology |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-15483-4 |edition=Second |location=New York, NY}}</ref>{{rp|69}} Without the expansion of the universe to cause the cooling of the CMB, the night sky would shine as brightly as the Sun.<ref>K.A. Olive and J.A. Peacock
The CMB contains the vast majority of photons in the universe by a factor of 400 to 1;<ref name=HistoryOfAlternatives>{{Cite journal |last1=Ćirković |first1=Milan M. |last2=Perović |first2=Slobodan |date=2018-05-01 |title=Alternative explanations of the cosmic microwave background: A historical and an epistemological perspective |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219816302039 |journal=Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics |volume=62 |pages=1–18 |doi=10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.04.005 |arxiv=1705.07721 |bibcode=2018SHPMP..62....1C |issn=1355-2198}}</ref>{{rp|5}} the number density of photons in the CMB is one billion times  (10<sup>9</sup>) the number density of matter in the universe. The present-day energy density of CMB photons greatly exceeds that of the photons emitted by all the stars over the history of the universe.<ref name=Ryden-2016>{{Cite book |last=Ryden |first=Barbara |title=Introduction to cosmology |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-15483-4 |edition=Second |location=New York, NY}}</ref>{{rp|71}} Without the expansion of the universe to cause the cooling of the CMB, the night sky would shine as brightly as the Sun.<ref>K.A. Olive and J.A. Peacock
(September 2017) [https://pdg.lbl.gov/2018/reviews/rpp2018-rev-bbang-cosmology.pdf "21. Big-Bang Cosmology"]
(September 2017) [https://pdg.lbl.gov/2018/reviews/rpp2018-rev-bbang-cosmology.pdf "21. Big-Bang Cosmology"]
in .S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), to be published in Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)</ref> The energy density of the CMB is {{convert|0.260|eV/cm3|J/m3|abbr=on}}, about 411 photons/cm<sup>3</sup>.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://pdg.lbl.gov/2020/reviews/rpp2020-rev-cosmic-microwave-background.pdf| title = 29. Cosmic Microwave Background: Particle Data Group P.A. Zyla (LBL, Berkeley) et al.}}</ref>
in .S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), to be published in Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)</ref> The energy density of the CMB is {{convert|0.260|eV/cm3|J/m3|abbr=on}}, about 411 photons/cm<sup>3</sup>.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://pdg.lbl.gov/2020/reviews/rpp2020-rev-cosmic-microwave-background.pdf| title = 29. Cosmic Microwave Background: Particle Data Group P.A. Zyla (LBL, Berkeley) et al.}}</ref>
Line 41: Line 41:
[[File:Horn Antenna-in Holmdel, New Jersey - restoration1.jpg|thumb|left|The [[Holmdel Horn Antenna]] on which Penzias and Wilson discovered the cosmic microwave background.<ref name="NYT-20230905" />]]
[[File:Horn Antenna-in Holmdel, New Jersey - restoration1.jpg|thumb|left|The [[Holmdel Horn Antenna]] on which Penzias and Wilson discovered the cosmic microwave background.<ref name="NYT-20230905" />]]


The first published recognition of the CMB radiation as a detectable phenomenon appeared in a brief paper by [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] astrophysicists [[A. G. Doroshkevich]] and [[Igor Dmitriyevich Novikov|Igor Novikov]], in the spring of 1964.<ref name="Penzias-Nobel-1979">{{Cite journal |last=Penzias |first=Arno A. |date=1979-07-01 |title=The origin of the elements |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.51.425 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060925205437/http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1978/penzias-lecture.pdf|archive-date=2006-09-25 | language=en |volume=51 |issue=3 |pages=425–431 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.51.425 |issn=0034-6861|url-access=subscription }}</ref> In 1964, [[David Todd Wilkinson]] and Peter Roll, [[Robert H. Dicke]]'s colleagues at [[Princeton University]], began constructing a [[Dicke radiometer]] to measure the cosmic microwave background.<ref>
The first published recognition of the CMB radiation as a detectable phenomenon appeared in a brief paper by [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] astrophysicists [[A. G. Doroshkevich]] and [[Igor Dmitriyevich Novikov|Igor Novikov]], in the spring of 1964.<ref name="Penzias-Nobel-1979">{{Cite journal |last=Penzias |first=Arno A. |date=1979-07-01 |title=The origin of the elements |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.51.425 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060925205437/http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1978/penzias-lecture.pdf|archive-date=2006-09-25 | language=en |volume=51 |issue=3 |pages=425–431 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.51.425 |bibcode=1979RvMP...51..425P |issn=0034-6861|url-access=subscription }}</ref> In 1964, [[David Todd Wilkinson]] and Peter Roll, [[Robert H. Dicke]]'s colleagues at [[Princeton University]], began constructing a [[Dicke radiometer]] to measure the cosmic microwave background.<ref>
{{cite journal|last=Dicke|first=R. H.|date=1946|title=The Measurement of Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies|journal=[[Review of Scientific Instruments]]|volume=17|pages=268–275|doi=10.1063/1.1770483|pmid=20991753|bibcode = 1946RScI...17..268D|issue=7 |s2cid=26658623 |doi-access=free}} This basic design for a radiometer has been used in most subsequent cosmic microwave background experiments.</ref> In 1964, [[Arno Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson]] at the [[Crawford Hill]] location of [[Bell Telephone Laboratories]] in nearby [[Holmdel Township, New Jersey]] had built a Dicke radiometer that they intended to use for radio astronomy and satellite communication experiments. The antenna was constructed in 1959 to support [[Project Echo]]—the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's passive communications satellites, which used large Earth orbiting aluminized plastic balloons as reflectors to bounce radio signals from one point on the Earth to another.<ref name="NYT-20230905">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |authorlink=Dennis Overbye |title=Back to New Jersey, Where the Universe Began - A half-century ago, a radio telescope in Holmdel, N.J., sent two astronomers 13.8 billion years back in time — and opened a cosmic window that scientists have been peering through ever since.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/04/science/astronomy-holmdel-antenna-microwaves.html |date=5 September 2023 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20230905113310/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/04/science/astronomy-holmdel-antenna-microwaves.html |archivedate=5 September 2023 |accessdate=5 September 2023 }}</ref> On 20&nbsp;May 1964 they made their first measurement clearly showing the presence of the microwave background,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/wilson-lecture-1.pdf| title = The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (Nobel Lecture) by Robert Wilson 8 Dec 1978, p.&nbsp;474}}</ref> with their instrument having an excess 4.2K [[noise temperature|antenna temperature]] which they could not account for. After receiving a telephone call from Crawford Hill, Dicke said "Boys, we've been scooped."<ref name="Penzias&Wilson">{{cite journal |last1=Penzias |first1=A. A. |last2=Wilson|first2=R. W. |date=1965 |title=A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s |journal=[[The Astrophysical Journal]] |volume=142 |issue=1 |pages=419–421 |bibcode=1965ApJ...142..419P |doi=10.1086/148307|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Smoot Group |date=28 March 1996 |title=The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. |url=http://aether.lbl.gov/www/science/cmb.html |publisher=[[Lawrence Berkeley Lab]] |access-date=2008-12-11}}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal|last=Dicke|first=R. H.|date=1946|title=The Measurement of Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies|journal=[[Review of Scientific Instruments]]|volume=17|pages=268–275|doi=10.1063/1.1770483|pmid=20991753|bibcode = 1946RScI...17..268D|issue=7 |s2cid=26658623 |doi-access=free}} This basic design for a radiometer has been used in most subsequent cosmic microwave background experiments.</ref> In 1964, [[Arno Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson]] at the [[Crawford Hill]] location of [[Bell Telephone Laboratories]] in nearby [[Holmdel Township, New Jersey]] had built a Dicke radiometer that they intended to use for radio astronomy and satellite communication experiments. The antenna was constructed in 1959 to support [[Project Echo]]—the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's passive communications satellites, which used large Earth orbiting aluminized plastic balloons as reflectors to bounce radio signals from one point on the Earth to another.<ref name="NYT-20230905">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Back to New Jersey, Where the Universe Began - A half-century ago, a radio telescope in Holmdel, N.J., sent two astronomers 13.8 billion years back in time — and opened a cosmic window that scientists have been peering through ever since.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/04/science/astronomy-holmdel-antenna-microwaves.html |date=5 September 2023 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20230905113310/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/04/science/astronomy-holmdel-antenna-microwaves.html |archive-date=5 September 2023 |access-date=5 September 2023 }}</ref> On 20&nbsp;May 1964 they made their first measurement clearly showing the presence of the microwave background,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/wilson-lecture-1.pdf| title = The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (Nobel Lecture) by Robert Wilson 8 Dec 1978, p.&nbsp;474}}</ref> with their instrument having an excess 4.2K [[noise temperature|antenna temperature]] which they could not account for. After receiving a telephone call from Crawford Hill, Dicke said "Boys, we've been scooped."<ref name="Penzias&Wilson">{{cite journal |last1=Penzias |first1=A. A. |last2=Wilson|first2=R. W. |date=1965 |title=A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s |journal=[[The Astrophysical Journal]] |volume=142 |issue=1 |pages=419–421 |bibcode=1965ApJ...142..419P |doi=10.1086/148307|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Smoot Group |date=28 March 1996 |title=The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. |url=http://aether.lbl.gov/www/science/cmb.html |publisher=[[Lawrence Berkeley Lab]] |access-date=2008-12-11}}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal|last=Dicke|first=R. H.|date=1965|title=Cosmic Black-Body Radiation|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=142|pages=414–419|doi=10.1086/148306|bibcode=1965ApJ...142..414D|display-authors=etal}}</ref><ref name=PeeblesPrinciples>{{cite book|last=Peebles|first=P. J. E|date=1993|title=Principles of Physical Cosmology|pages=[https://archive.org/details/principlesofphys00pjep/page/139 139–148]|publisher=[[Princeton University Press]]|isbn=978-0-691-01933-8|url=https://archive.org/details/principlesofphys00pjep/page/139}}</ref>{{rp|140}} A meeting between the Princeton and Crawford Hill groups determined that the antenna temperature was indeed due to the microwave background. Penzias and Wilson received the 1978 [[Nobel Prize in Physics]] for their discovery.<ref name="PenziasWilsonNobelSummary">{{cite web|date=1978|title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1978|url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1978/|publisher=[[Nobel Foundation]]|access-date=2009-01-08}}</ref>
{{cite journal|last=Dicke|first=R. H.|date=1965|title=Cosmic Black-Body Radiation|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=142|pages=414–419|doi=10.1086/148306|bibcode=1965ApJ...142..414D|display-authors=etal}}</ref><ref name=PeeblesPrinciples>{{cite book|last=Peebles|first=P. J. E|date=1993|title=Principles of Physical Cosmology|pages=[https://archive.org/details/principlesofphys00pjep/page/139 139–148]|publisher=[[Princeton University Press]]|isbn=978-0-691-01933-8|url=https://archive.org/details/principlesofphys00pjep/page/139}}</ref>{{rp|140}} A meeting between the Princeton and Crawford Hill groups determined that the antenna temperature was indeed due to the microwave background. Penzias and Wilson received the 1978 [[Nobel Prize in Physics]] for their discovery.<ref name="PenziasWilsonNobelSummary">{{cite web|date=1978|title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1978|url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1978/|publisher=[[Nobel Foundation]]|access-date=2009-01-08}}</ref>


Line 66: Line 66:


=== Precision cosmology ===
=== Precision cosmology ===
Inspired by the COBE results, a series of ground and balloon-based experiments measured cosmic microwave background anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the{{Which|date=June 2024}} two decades. The sensitivity of the new experiments improved dramatically, with a reduction in internal noise by three orders of magnitude.<ref name="Komatsu2022Review">{{Cite journal |last=Komatsu |first=Eiichiro |date=2022-05-18 |title=New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-022-00452-4 |journal=Nature Reviews Physics |language=en |volume=4 |issue=7 |pages=452–469 |doi=10.1038/s42254-022-00452-4 |issn=2522-5820|arxiv=2202.13919 |bibcode=2022NatRP...4..452K }}</ref> The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the scale of the first acoustic peak, which COBE did not have sufficient resolution to resolve. This peak corresponds to large scale density variations in the early universe that are created by gravitational instabilities, resulting in acoustical oscillations in the plasma.<ref>
Inspired by the COBE results, a series of ground and balloon-based experiments measured cosmic microwave background anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the next two decades. The sensitivity of the new experiments improved dramatically, with a reduction in internal noise by three orders of magnitude.<ref name="Komatsu2022Review">{{Cite journal |last=Komatsu |first=Eiichiro |date=2022-05-18 |title=New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-022-00452-4 |journal=Nature Reviews Physics |language=en |volume=4 |issue=7 |pages=452–469 |doi=10.1038/s42254-022-00452-4 |issn=2522-5820|arxiv=2202.13919 |bibcode=2022NatRP...4..452K }}</ref> The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the scale of the first acoustic peak, which COBE did not have sufficient resolution to resolve. This peak corresponds to large scale density variations in the early universe that are created by gravitational instabilities, resulting in acoustical oscillations in the plasma.<ref>
{{cite book|last=Grupen|first=C. |date=2005|title=Astroparticle Physics|pages=240–241|publisher=[[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer]]|isbn=978-3-540-25312-9|display-authors=etal}}</ref> The first peak in the anisotropy was tentatively detected by the [[Mobile Anisotropy Telescope|MAT/TOCO]] experiment<ref>
{{cite book|last=Grupen|first=C. |date=2005|title=Astroparticle Physics|pages=240–241|publisher=[[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer]]|isbn=978-3-540-25312-9|display-authors=etal}}</ref> The first peak in the anisotropy was tentatively detected by the [[Mobile Anisotropy Telescope|MAT/TOCO]] experiment<ref>
{{cite journal|last=Miller|first=A. D.|date=1999|title=A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Microwave Background Made from the High Chilean Andes|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=521|issue=2|pages=L79–L82|doi=10.1086/312197|bibcode=1999ApJ...521L..79T|arxiv = astro-ph/9905100 |s2cid=16534514|display-authors=etal}}</ref> and the result was confirmed by the [[BOOMERanG experiment|BOOMERanG]]<ref>
{{cite journal|last=Miller|first=A. D.|date=1999|title=A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Microwave Background Made from the High Chilean Andes|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=521|issue=2|pages=L79–L82|doi=10.1086/312197|bibcode=1999ApJ...521L..79T|arxiv = astro-ph/9905100 |s2cid=16534514|display-authors=etal}}</ref> and the result was confirmed by the [[BOOMERanG experiment|BOOMERanG]]<ref>
{{cite journal|last=Melchiorri|first=A.|date=2000|title=A Measurement of Ω from the North American Test Flight of Boomerang|journal=[[The Astrophysical Journal Letters]]|volume=536|issue=2|pages=L63–L66|doi=10.1086/312744|pmid=10859119|bibcode=2000ApJ...536L..63M|arxiv = astro-ph/9911445 |s2cid=27518923|display-authors=etal}}</ref> and [[Millimeter Anisotropy eXperiment IMaging Array|MAXIMA]] experiments.<ref>
{{cite journal|author1-link=Alessandro Melchiorri|last=Melchiorri|first=A.|date=2000|title=A Measurement of Ω from the North American Test Flight of Boomerang|journal=[[The Astrophysical Journal Letters]]|volume=536|issue=2|pages=L63–L66|doi=10.1086/312744|pmid=10859119|bibcode=2000ApJ...536L..63M|arxiv = astro-ph/9911445 |s2cid=27518923|display-authors=etal}}</ref> and [[Millimeter Anisotropy eXperiment IMaging Array|MAXIMA]] experiments.<ref>
{{cite journal|last=Hanany|first=S.|date=2000|title=MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10'–5°|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=545|issue=1|pages=L5–L9|doi=10.1086/317322|bibcode=2000ApJ...545L...5H|arxiv = astro-ph/0005123 |s2cid=119495132|display-authors=etal}}</ref> These measurements demonstrated that the [[Shape of the universe|geometry of the universe]] is approximately flat, rather than [[curved space|curved]].<ref>
{{cite journal|last=Hanany|first=S.|date=2000|title=MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10'–5°|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=545|issue=1|pages=L5–L9|doi=10.1086/317322|bibcode=2000ApJ...545L...5H|arxiv = astro-ph/0005123 |s2cid=119495132|display-authors=etal}}</ref> These measurements demonstrated that the [[Shape of the universe|geometry of the universe]] is approximately flat, rather than [[curved space|curved]].<ref>
{{cite journal|last=de Bernardis|first=P.|year=2000|title=A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]|volume=404|pmid=10801117|issue=6781|pages=955–959|bibcode=2000Natur.404..955D|doi=10.1038/35010035|arxiv = astro-ph/0004404 |display-authors=etal|hdl=10044/1/60851|s2cid=4412370}}</ref> They ruled out [[cosmic string]]s as a major component of cosmic structure formation and suggested [[cosmic inflation]] was the right theory of structure formation.<ref>
{{cite journal|last=de Bernardis|first=P.|year=2000|title=A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]|volume=404|pmid=10801117|issue=6781|pages=955–959|bibcode=2000Natur.404..955D|doi=10.1038/35010035|arxiv = astro-ph/0004404 |display-authors=etal|hdl=10044/1/60851|s2cid=4412370}}</ref> They ruled out [[cosmic string]]s as a major component of cosmic structure formation and suggested [[cosmic inflation]] was the right theory of structure formation.<ref>
{{cite journal|last=Pogosian|first=L.|author-link1=Levon Pogosian|year=2003|title=Observational constraints on cosmic string production during brane inflation|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=68|issue=2|pages=023506|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023506|arxiv = hep-th/0304188 |bibcode = 2003PhRvD..68b3506P |display-authors=etal}}</ref>
{{cite journal|last=Pogosian|first=L.|author-link1=Levon Pogosian|year=2003|title=Observational constraints on cosmic string production during brane inflation|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=68|issue=2|article-number=023506|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023506|arxiv = hep-th/0304188 |bibcode = 2003PhRvD..68b3506P |display-authors=etal}}</ref>


===Observations after COBE===
===Observations after COBE===
Line 84: Line 84:
{{main |Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe}}
{{main |Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe}}
In June 2001, [[NASA]] launched a second CMB space mission, [[WMAP]], to make much more precise measurements of the large-scale anisotropies over the full sky. [[WMAP]] used symmetric, rapid-multi-modulated scanning, rapid switching radiometers at five frequencies to minimize non-sky signal noise.<ref name="FirstWMAP"/> The data from the mission was released in five installments, the last being the nine-year summary.
In June 2001, [[NASA]] launched a second CMB space mission, [[WMAP]], to make much more precise measurements of the large-scale anisotropies over the full sky. [[WMAP]] used symmetric, rapid-multi-modulated scanning, rapid switching radiometers at five frequencies to minimize non-sky signal noise.<ref name="FirstWMAP"/> The data from the mission was released in five installments, the last being the nine-year summary.
The results are broadly consistent [[Lambda CDM]] models based on 6 free parameters and fitting in to Big Bang cosmology with [[cosmic inflation]].<ref name=WMAP9Map>{{Cite journal |last1=Bennett |first1=C. L. |last2=Larson |first2=D. |last3=Weiland |first3=J. L. |last4=Jarosik |first4=N. |last5=Hinshaw |first5=G. |last6=Odegard |first6=N. |last7=Smith |first7=K. M. |last8=Hill |first8=R. S. |last9=Gold |first9=B. |last10=Halpern |first10=M. |last11=Komatsu |first11=E. |last12=Nolta |first12=M. R. |last13=Page |first13=L. |last14=Spergel |first14=D. N. |last15=Wollack |first15=E. |date=2013-09-20 |title=NINE-YEAR ''WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE'' ( ''WMAP'' ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 |journal=The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series |volume=208 |issue=2 |pages=20 |doi=10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 |issn=0067-0049|arxiv=1212.5225 |bibcode=2013ApJS..208...20B }}</ref>
The results are broadly consistent [[Lambda CDM]] models based on 6 free parameters and fitting in to Big Bang cosmology with [[cosmic inflation]].<ref name=WMAP9Map>{{Cite journal |last1=Bennett |first1=C. L. |last2=Larson |first2=D. |last3=Weiland |first3=J. L. |last4=Jarosik |first4=N. |last5=Hinshaw |first5=G. |last6=Odegard |first6=N. |last7=Smith |first7=K. M. |last8=Hill |first8=R. S. |last9=Gold |first9=B. |last10=Halpern |first10=M. |last11=Komatsu |first11=E. |last12=Nolta |first12=M. R. |last13=Page |first13=L. |last14=Spergel |first14=D. N. |last15=Wollack |first15=E. |date=2013-09-20 |title=NINE-YEAR ''WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE'' ( ''WMAP'' ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 |journal=The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series |volume=208 |issue=2 |page=20 |doi=10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 |issn=0067-0049|arxiv=1212.5225 |bibcode=2013ApJS..208...20B }}</ref>


===Degree Angular Scale Interferometer===
===Degree Angular Scale Interferometer===
Line 96: Line 96:
A third space mission, the [[European Space Agency|ESA]] (European Space Agency) [[Planck Surveyor]], was launched in May 2009 and performed an even more detailed investigation until it was shut down in October 2013. Planck employed both [[HEMT]] radiometers and [[bolometer]] technology and measured the CMB at a smaller scale than WMAP. Its detectors were trialled in the Antarctic [[Viper telescope]] as ACBAR ([[Arcminute Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver]]) experiment—which has produced the most precise measurements at small angular scales to date—and in the [[Archeops]] balloon telescope.
A third space mission, the [[European Space Agency|ESA]] (European Space Agency) [[Planck Surveyor]], was launched in May 2009 and performed an even more detailed investigation until it was shut down in October 2013. Planck employed both [[HEMT]] radiometers and [[bolometer]] technology and measured the CMB at a smaller scale than WMAP. Its detectors were trialled in the Antarctic [[Viper telescope]] as ACBAR ([[Arcminute Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver]]) experiment—which has produced the most precise measurements at small angular scales to date—and in the [[Archeops]] balloon telescope.


On 21 March 2013, the European-led research team behind the [[Planck (spacecraft)|''Planck'' cosmology probe]] released the mission's all-sky map ([https://web.archive.org/web/20131202233029/http://esacmt.esac.esa.int/science-e-media/img/61/51553_Planck_CMB_Mollweide_565.jpg 565x318 jpeg], [https://web.archive.org/web/20170215024745/https://www.nasa.gov/images/content/735683main_pia16873-full_full.jpg 3600x1800 jpeg]) of the cosmic microwave background.<ref name="NASA-20130321">{{cite web|last1=Clavin |first1=Whitney |last2=Harrington |first2=J.D. |title=Planck Mission Brings Universe Into Sharp Focus |url=http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-109&rn=news.xml&rst=3739 |date=21 March 2013|website=[[NASA]] |access-date=21 March 2013 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20130321g">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=Mapping the Early Universe |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/21/science/space/0321-universe.html |date=21 March 2013 |website=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=23 March 2013 }}</ref> The map suggests the universe is slightly older than researchers expected. According to the map, subtle fluctuations in temperature were imprinted on the deep sky when the cosmos was about {{val|370000}} years old. The imprint reflects ripples that arose as early, in the existence of the universe, as the first [[Nonillion#Standard dictionary numbers|nonillionth]] (10<sup>−30</sup>) of a second. Apparently, these ripples gave rise to the present vast [[Cosmic Web#Large-scale structure|cosmic web]] of [[galaxy cluster]]s and [[dark matter]]. Based on the 2013 data, the universe contains 4.9% [[matter|ordinary matter]], 26.8% [[dark matter]] and 68.3% [[dark energy]]. On 5 February 2015, new data was released by the ''Planck'' mission, according to which the age of the universe is {{val|13.799|0.021}} [[1,000,000,000 (number)|billion]] years old and the [[Hubble constant]] was measured to be {{val|67.74|0.46|u=(km/s)/Mpc}}.<ref name="Planck 2015">{{cite journal
On 21 March 2013, the European-led research team behind the [[Planck (spacecraft)|''Planck'' cosmology probe]] released the mission's all-sky map of the cosmic microwave background.<ref name="NASA-20130321">{{cite web|last1=Clavin |first1=Whitney |last2=Harrington |first2=J.D. |title=Planck Mission Brings Universe Into Sharp Focus |url=http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-109&rn=news.xml&rst=3739 |date=21 March 2013|website=[[NASA]] |access-date=21 March 2013 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20130321g">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=Mapping the Early Universe |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/21/science/space/0321-universe.html |date=21 March 2013 |website=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=23 March 2013 }}</ref> The map suggests the universe is slightly older than researchers expected. According to the map, subtle fluctuations in temperature were imprinted on the deep sky when the cosmos was about {{val|370000}} years old. The imprint reflects ripples that arose as early, in the existence of the universe, as the first [[Nonillion#Standard dictionary numbers|nonillionth]] (10<sup>−30</sup>) of a second. Apparently, these ripples gave rise to the present vast [[Cosmic Web#Large-scale structure|cosmic web]] of [[galaxy cluster]]s and [[dark matter]]. Based on the 2013 data, the universe contains 4.9% [[matter|ordinary matter]], 26.8% [[dark matter]] and 68.3% [[dark energy]]. On 5 February 2015, new data was released by the ''Planck'' mission, according to which the age of the universe is {{val|13.799|0.021}} [[1,000,000,000 (number)|billion]] years old and the [[Hubble constant]] was measured to be {{val|67.74|0.46|u=(km/s)/Mpc}}.<ref name="Planck 2015">{{cite journal
  |author=Planck Collaboration
  |author=Planck Collaboration
  |year=2016
  |year=2016
Line 116: Line 116:
The cosmic microwave background radiation and the [[Hubble's law|cosmological redshift]]-distance relation are together regarded as the best available evidence for the [[Big Bang]] event. Measurements of the CMB have made the inflationary Big Bang model the [[Standard Cosmological Model]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Scott|first=D.|date=2005|title=The Standard Cosmological Model|arxiv=astro-ph/0510731|doi=10.1139/P06-066|volume=84|issue=6–7|journal=Canadian Journal of Physics|pages=419–435|bibcode = 2006CaJPh..84..419S |citeseerx=10.1.1.317.2954|s2cid=15606491}}</ref> The discovery of the CMB in the mid-1960s curtailed interest in [[non-standard cosmology|alternatives]] such as the [[steady state theory]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Durham, Frank|author2=Purrington, Robert D.|title=Frame of the universe: a history of physical cosmology|url=https://archive.org/details/frameofuniverseh0000durh|url-access=registration|publisher=Columbia University Press|date=1983|isbn=978-0-231-05393-8|pages=[https://archive.org/details/frameofuniverseh0000durh/page/193 193–209]}}</ref>
The cosmic microwave background radiation and the [[Hubble's law|cosmological redshift]]-distance relation are together regarded as the best available evidence for the [[Big Bang]] event. Measurements of the CMB have made the inflationary Big Bang model the [[Standard Cosmological Model]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Scott|first=D.|date=2005|title=The Standard Cosmological Model|arxiv=astro-ph/0510731|doi=10.1139/P06-066|volume=84|issue=6–7|journal=Canadian Journal of Physics|pages=419–435|bibcode = 2006CaJPh..84..419S |citeseerx=10.1.1.317.2954|s2cid=15606491}}</ref> The discovery of the CMB in the mid-1960s curtailed interest in [[non-standard cosmology|alternatives]] such as the [[steady state theory]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Durham, Frank|author2=Purrington, Robert D.|title=Frame of the universe: a history of physical cosmology|url=https://archive.org/details/frameofuniverseh0000durh|url-access=registration|publisher=Columbia University Press|date=1983|isbn=978-0-231-05393-8|pages=[https://archive.org/details/frameofuniverseh0000durh/page/193 193–209]}}</ref>


In the [[Big Bang]] model for the formation of the [[universe]], [[inflation (cosmology)|inflationary cosmology]] predicts that after about 10<sup>−37</sup> seconds<ref>{{cite book|last=Guth|first=A. H.|date=1998|title=The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins|page=[https://archive.org/details/inflationaryuniv0000guth/page/186 186]|publisher=[[Basic Books]]|isbn=978-0201328400|oclc=35701222|url=https://archive.org/details/inflationaryuniv0000guth/page/186}}</ref> the nascent universe underwent [[exponential growth]] that smoothed out nearly all irregularities. The remaining irregularities were caused by quantum fluctuations in the [[inflaton]] field that caused the inflation event.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cirigliano |first1=D. |last2=de Vega |first2=H.J. |last3=Sanchez |first3=N. G. |author-link3=Norma Sanchez |date=2005 |title=Clarifying inflation models: The precise inflationary potential from effective field theory and the WMAP data |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/812888 |journal=[[Physical Review D]] |type=Submitted manuscript |volume=71 |issue=10 |pages=77–115 |arxiv=astro-ph/0412634 |bibcode=2005PhRvD..71j3518C |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.71.103518 |s2cid=36572996}}</ref> Long before the formation of stars and planets, the early universe was more compact, much hotter and, starting 10<sup>−6</sup> seconds after the Big Bang, filled with a uniform glow from its white-hot fog of interacting [[Plasma (physics)|plasma]] of [[photon]]s, [[electron]]s, and [[baryon]]s.
In the [[Big Bang]] model for the formation of the [[universe]], [[inflation (cosmology)|inflationary cosmology]] predicts that after about 10<sup>−37</sup> seconds<ref>{{cite book|last=Guth|first=A. H.|date=1998|title=The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins|page=[https://archive.org/details/inflationaryuniv0000guth/page/186 186]|publisher=[[Basic Books]]|isbn=978-0-201-32840-0|oclc=35701222|url=https://archive.org/details/inflationaryuniv0000guth/page/186}}</ref> the nascent universe underwent [[exponential growth]] that smoothed out nearly all irregularities. The remaining irregularities were caused by quantum fluctuations in the [[inflaton]] field that caused the inflation event.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cirigliano |first1=D. |last2=de Vega |first2=H.J. |last3=Sanchez |first3=N. G. |author-link3=Norma Sanchez |date=2005 |title=Clarifying inflation models: The precise inflationary potential from effective field theory and the WMAP data |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/812888 |journal=[[Physical Review D]] |type=Submitted manuscript |volume=71 |issue=10 |pages=77–115 |arxiv=astro-ph/0412634 |bibcode=2005PhRvD..71j3518C |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.71.103518 |s2cid=36572996}}</ref> Long before the formation of stars and planets, the early universe was more compact, much hotter and, starting 10<sup>−6</sup> seconds after the Big Bang, filled with a uniform glow from its white-hot fog of interacting [[Plasma (physics)|plasma]] of [[photon]]s, [[electron]]s, and [[baryon]]s.


As the universe [[metric expansion of space|expanded]], [[Adiabatic process|adiabatic]] cooling caused the energy density of the plasma to decrease until it became favorable for [[electron]]s to combine with [[proton]]s, forming [[hydrogen]] atoms. This [[recombination (cosmology)|recombination]] event happened when the temperature was around 3000&nbsp;K or when the universe was approximately 379,000&nbsp;years old.<ref>{{cite web|last=Abbott |first=B. |date=2007 |title=Microwave (WMAP) All-Sky Survey |url=http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/universe/duguide/exgg_wmap.php |publisher=[[Hayden Planetarium]] |access-date=2008-01-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130213023246/http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/universe/duguide/exgg_wmap.php |archive-date=2013-02-13 }}</ref> As photons did not interact with these electrically neutral atoms, the former began to travel [[free streaming|freely]] through space, resulting in the [[Decoupling (cosmology)|decoupling]] of matter and radiation.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gawiser|first1=E.|last2=Silk|first2=J.|date=2000|title=The cosmic microwave background radiation|journal=[[Physics Reports]]|volume=333–334|issue=2000|pages=245–267|doi=10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00025-9|arxiv=astro-ph/0002044|bibcode = 2000PhR...333..245G |citeseerx=10.1.1.588.3349|s2cid=15398837}}</ref>
As the universe [[metric expansion of space|expanded]], [[Adiabatic process|adiabatic]] cooling caused the energy density of the plasma to decrease until it became favorable for [[electron]]s to combine with [[proton]]s, forming [[hydrogen]] atoms. This [[recombination (cosmology)|recombination]] event happened when the temperature was around 3000&nbsp;K or when the universe was approximately 379,000&nbsp;years old.<ref>{{cite web|last=Abbott |first=B. |date=2007 |title=Microwave (WMAP) All-Sky Survey |url=http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/universe/duguide/exgg_wmap.php |publisher=[[Hayden Planetarium]] |access-date=2008-01-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130213023246/http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/universe/duguide/exgg_wmap.php |archive-date=2013-02-13 }}</ref> As photons did not interact with these electrically neutral atoms, the former began to travel [[free streaming|freely]] through space, resulting in the [[Decoupling (cosmology)|decoupling]] of matter and radiation.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gawiser|first1=E.|last2=Silk|first2=J.|date=2000|title=The cosmic microwave background radiation|journal=[[Physics Reports]]|volume=333–334|issue=2000|pages=245–267|doi=10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00025-9|arxiv=astro-ph/0002044|bibcode = 2000PhR...333..245G |citeseerx=10.1.1.588.3349|s2cid=15398837}}</ref>


The [[color temperature]] of the ensemble of decoupled photons has continued to diminish ever since; now down to {{val|2.7260|0.0013|u=K}},<ref name=apj707_2_916/> it will continue to drop as the universe expands. The intensity of the radiation corresponds to black-body radiation at 2.726&nbsp;K because red-shifted black-body radiation is just like black-body radiation at a lower temperature. According to the Big Bang model, the radiation from the sky we measure today comes from a spherical surface called ''the surface of last scattering''. This represents the set of locations in space at which the decoupling event is estimated to have occurred<ref>
The [[color temperature]] of the ensemble of decoupled photons has continued to diminish ever since; now down to {{val|2.7260|0.0013|u=K}},<ref name=apj707_2_916/> it will continue to drop as the universe expands. The intensity of the radiation corresponds to black-body radiation at 2.726&nbsp;K because red-shifted black-body radiation is just like black-body radiation at a lower temperature. According to the Big Bang model, the radiation from the sky we measure today comes from a spherical surface called ''the surface of last scattering''. This represents the set of locations in space at which the decoupling event is estimated to have occurred<ref>
Line 130: Line 130:
In the late 1940s Alpher and Herman reasoned that if there was a Big Bang, the expansion of the universe would have stretched the high-energy radiation of the very early universe into the microwave region of the [[electromagnetic spectrum]], and down to a temperature of about 5&nbsp;K. They were slightly off with their estimate, but they had the right idea. They predicted the CMB. It took another 15 years for Penzias and Wilson to discover that the microwave background was actually there.<ref name="Apeiron2_3_79"/>
In the late 1940s Alpher and Herman reasoned that if there was a Big Bang, the expansion of the universe would have stretched the high-energy radiation of the very early universe into the microwave region of the [[electromagnetic spectrum]], and down to a temperature of about 5&nbsp;K. They were slightly off with their estimate, but they had the right idea. They predicted the CMB. It took another 15 years for Penzias and Wilson to discover that the microwave background was actually there.<ref name="Apeiron2_3_79"/>


According to standard cosmology, the CMB gives a snapshot of the hot early [[universe]] at the point in time when the temperature dropped enough to allow [[electron]]s and [[proton]]s to form [[hydrogen]] atoms. This event made the universe nearly transparent to radiation because light was no longer being [[Thomson scattering|scattered]] off free electrons.<ref>{{cite episode |last=Kaku |first=M. |author-link=Michio Kaku |date=2014 |title=First Second of the Big Bang |series=[[How the Universe Works]] |season=3 |number=4 |network=[[Science Channel|Discovery Science]]}}</ref> When this occurred some 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was about 3,000&nbsp;K. This corresponds to an ambient energy of about {{val|0.26|ul=eV}}, which is much less than the {{val|13.6|u=eV}} ionization energy of hydrogen.<ref>{{cite arXiv |eprint=astro-ph/9508159|last1=Fixsen|first1=D. J.|title=Formation of Structure in the Universe|year=1995}}</ref> This epoch is generally known as the "time of last scattering" or the period of [[recombination (cosmology)|recombination]] or [[Decoupling (cosmology)|decoupling]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Convert?exp=3&num=3&From=k&To=ev&Action=Convert+value+and+show+factor | title=Converted number: Conversion from K to eV}}</ref>
According to standard cosmology, the CMB gives a snapshot of the hot early [[universe]] at the point in time when the temperature dropped enough to allow [[electron]]s and [[proton]]s to form [[hydrogen]] atoms. This event made the universe nearly transparent to radiation because light was no longer being [[Thomson scattering|scattered]] off free electrons.<ref>{{cite episode |last=Kaku |first=M. |author-link=Michio Kaku |date=2014 |title=First Second of the Big Bang |series=[[How the Universe Works]] |season=3 |number=4 |network=[[Science Channel|Discovery Science]]}}</ref> When this occurred some 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was about 3,000&nbsp;K. This corresponds to an ambient energy of about {{val|0.26|ul=eV}}, which is much less than the {{val|13.6|u=eV}} ionization energy of hydrogen.<ref>{{cite arXiv |eprint=astro-ph/9508159|last1=Fixsen|first1=D. J.|title=Formation of Structure in the Universe|year=1995 }}</ref> This epoch is generally known as the "time of last scattering" or the period of [[recombination (cosmology)|recombination]] or [[Decoupling (cosmology)|decoupling]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Convert?exp=3&num=3&From=k&To=ev&Action=Convert+value+and+show+factor | title=Converted number: Conversion from K to eV}}</ref>


Since decoupling, the color temperature of the background radiation has dropped by an average factor of 1,089<ref name="FirstWMAP"/> due to the expansion of the universe. As the universe expands, the CMB photons are [[redshift]]ed, causing them to decrease in energy. The color temperature of this radiation stays [[inversely proportional]] to a parameter that describes the relative expansion of the universe over time, known as the [[scale factor (universe)|scale length]]. The color temperature ''T''<sub>r</sub> of the CMB as a function of redshift, ''z'', can be shown to be proportional to the color temperature of the CMB as observed in the present day (2.725&nbsp;K or 0.2348&nbsp;meV):<ref>{{cite journal | author=Noterdaeme, P. | author2=Petitjean, P. | author3=Srianand, R. | author4=Ledoux, C. | author5=López, S. | title=The evolution of the cosmic microwave background temperature. Measurements of T<sub>CMB</sub> at high redshift from carbon monoxide excitation | journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics | volume=526 |date=February 2011 | doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201016140 | bibcode=2011A&A...526L...7N | arxiv=1012.3164 | pages=L7 | s2cid=118485014 }}</ref>
Since decoupling, the color temperature of the background radiation has dropped by an average factor of 1,089<ref name="FirstWMAP"/> due to the expansion of the universe. As the universe expands, the CMB photons are [[redshift]]ed, causing them to decrease in energy. The color temperature of this radiation stays [[inversely proportional]] to a parameter that describes the relative expansion of the universe over time, known as the [[scale factor (universe)|scale length]]. The color temperature ''T''<sub>r</sub> of the CMB as a function of redshift, ''z'', can be shown to be proportional to the color temperature of the CMB as observed in the present day (2.725&nbsp;K or 0.2348&nbsp;meV):<ref>{{cite journal | author=Noterdaeme, P. | author2=Petitjean, P. | author3=Srianand, R. | author4=Ledoux, C. | author5=López, S. | title=The evolution of the cosmic microwave background temperature. Measurements of T<sub>CMB</sub> at high redshift from carbon monoxide excitation | journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics | volume=526 |date=February 2011 | doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201016140 | bibcode=2011A&A...526L...7N | arxiv=1012.3164 | pages=L7 | s2cid=118485014 }}</ref>
:''T''<sub>r</sub> = 2.725&nbsp;K × (1 + ''z'')
:''T''<sub>r</sub> = 2.725&nbsp;K × (1 + ''z'')


The high degree of uniformity throughout the [[observable universe]] and its faint but measured anisotropy lend strong support for the Big Bang model in general and the [[Lambda-CDM model|ΛCDM ("Lambda Cold Dark Matter") model]] in particular. Moreover, the fluctuations are [[coherence (physics)|coherent]] on angular scales that are larger than the apparent [[cosmological horizon]] at recombination. Either such coherence is acausally [[fine-tuning (physics)|fine-tuned]], or [[cosmic inflation]] occurred.<ref name="hep-ph/0309057">{{cite journal |last=Dodelson |first=S. |year=2003 |title=Coherent Phase Argument for Inflation |journal=[[AIP Conference Proceedings]] |volume=689 |pages=184–196 |arxiv=hep-ph/0309057 |bibcode=2003AIPC..689..184D |doi=10.1063/1.1627736|citeseerx=10.1.1.344.3524 |s2cid=18570203 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Baumann |first=D. |date=2011 |title=The Physics of Inflation |url=http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/TEACHING/INFLATION/Lectures.pdf |publisher=[[University of Cambridge]] |access-date=2015-05-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921195002/http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/TEACHING/INFLATION/Lectures.pdf |archive-date=2018-09-21 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
The high degree of uniformity throughout the [[observable universe]] and its faint but measured anisotropy lend strong support for the Big Bang model in general and the [[Lambda-CDM model|ΛCDM ("Lambda Cold Dark Matter") model]] in particular. Moreover, the fluctuations are [[coherence (physics)|coherent]] on angular scales that are larger than the apparent [[cosmological horizon]] at recombination. Either such coherence is acausally [[fine-tuning (physics)|fine-tuned]], or [[cosmic inflation]] occurred.<ref name="hep-ph/0309057">{{cite journal |last=Dodelson |first=S. |year=2003 |title=Coherent Phase Argument for Inflation |journal=[[AIP Conference Proceedings]] |volume=689 |pages=184–196 |arxiv=hep-ph/0309057 |bibcode=2003AIPC..689..184D |doi=10.1063/1.1627736|citeseerx=10.1.1.344.3524 |s2cid=18570203 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Baumann |first=D. |date=2011 |title=The Physics of Inflation |url=http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/TEACHING/INFLATION/Lectures.pdf |publisher=[[University of Cambridge]] |access-date=2015-05-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921195002/http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/TEACHING/INFLATION/Lectures.pdf |archive-date=2018-09-21 }}</ref>


====Primary anisotropy====
====Primary anisotropy====
Line 176: Line 176:
{{main| Non-standard cosmology }}
{{main| Non-standard cosmology }}
The standard cosmology that includes the Big Bang "enjoys considerable popularity among the practicing cosmologists"<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan>{{Cite journal |last1=Narlikar |first1=Jayant V. |last2=Padmanabhan |first2=T. |date=September 2001 |title=Standard Cosmology and Alternatives: A Critical Appraisal |url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.211 |journal=Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics |language=en |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=211–248 |doi=10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.211 |bibcode=2001ARA&A..39..211N |issn=0066-4146|url-access=subscription }}</ref>{{rp|211}}
The standard cosmology that includes the Big Bang "enjoys considerable popularity among the practicing cosmologists"<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan>{{Cite journal |last1=Narlikar |first1=Jayant V. |last2=Padmanabhan |first2=T. |date=September 2001 |title=Standard Cosmology and Alternatives: A Critical Appraisal |url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.211 |journal=Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics |language=en |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=211–248 |doi=10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.211 |bibcode=2001ARA&A..39..211N |issn=0066-4146|url-access=subscription }}</ref>{{rp|211}}
However, there are challenges to the standard big bang framework for explaining CMB data. In particular standard cosmology requires [[Fine-tuning (physics)|fine-tuning]] of some free parameters, with different values supported by different experimental data.<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan/>{{rp|245}}
However, there are challenges to the standard Big Bang framework for explaining CMB data. In particular standard cosmology requires [[Fine-tuning (physics)|fine-tuning]] of some free parameters, with different values supported by different experimental data.<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan/>{{rp|245}}
As an example of the fine-tuning issue, standard cosmology cannot predict the present temperature of the relic radiation, <math>T_0</math>.<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan/>{{rp|229}} This value of <math>T_0</math> is one of the best results of experimental cosmology and the [[steady state model]] can predict it.<ref name="Apeiron2_3_79"/>
As an example of the fine-tuning issue, standard cosmology cannot predict the present temperature of the relic radiation, <math>T_0</math>.<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan/>{{rp|229}} This value of <math>T_0</math> is one of the best results of experimental cosmology and the [[steady state model]] can predict it.<ref name="Apeiron2_3_79"/>
However, alternative models have their own set of problems and they have only made post-facto explanations of existing observations.<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan/>{{rp|239}} Nevertheless, these alternatives have played an important historic role in providing ideas for and challenges to the standard explanation.<ref name=HistoryOfAlternatives/>
However, alternative models have their own set of problems and they have only made post-facto explanations of existing observations.<ref name=NarlikarPadmanabhan/>{{rp|239}} Nevertheless, these alternatives have played an important historic role in providing ideas for and challenges to the standard explanation.<ref name=HistoryOfAlternatives/>
Line 187: Line 187:
=== E-modes ===
=== E-modes ===
The E-modes arise from [[Thomson scattering]] in a heterogeneous plasma.<ref name=Trippe2014>{{Cite journal |last=Trippe |first=Sascha |date=2014 |title=Polarization and Polarimetry: A Review |url=http://koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201408739562367.page |journal=Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society |volume=47 |issue=1 |pages=15–39 |doi=10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.1.15 |issn=1225-4614|arxiv=1401.1911 |bibcode=2014JKAS...47...15T }}</ref>
The E-modes arise from [[Thomson scattering]] in a heterogeneous plasma.<ref name=Trippe2014>{{Cite journal |last=Trippe |first=Sascha |date=2014 |title=Polarization and Polarimetry: A Review |url=http://koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201408739562367.page |journal=Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society |volume=47 |issue=1 |pages=15–39 |doi=10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.1.15 |issn=1225-4614|arxiv=1401.1911 |bibcode=2014JKAS...47...15T }}</ref>
E-modes were first seen in 2002 by the [[Degree Angular Scale Interferometer]] (DASI).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kovac |first1=J. M. |last2=Leitch |first2=E. M. |last3=Pryke |first3=C. |last4=Carlstrom |first4=J. E. |last5=Halverson |first5=N. W. |last6=Holzapfel |first6=W. L. |date=December 2002 |title=Detection of polarization in the cosmic microwave background using DASI |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01269 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=420 |issue=6917 |pages=772–787 |doi=10.1038/nature01269 |pmid=12490941 |issn=0028-0836|arxiv=astro-ph/0209478 |bibcode=2002Natur.420..772K }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ade |first1=P. A. R. |last2=Aikin |first2=R. W. |last3=Barkats |first3=D. |last4=Benton |first4=S. J. |last5=Bischoff |first5=C. A. |last6=Bock |first6=J. J. |last7=Brevik |first7=J. A. |last8=Buder |first8=I. |last9=Bullock |first9=E. |last10=Dowell |first10=C. D. |last11=Duband |first11=L. |last12=Filippini |first12=J. P. |last13=Fliescher |first13=S. |last14=Golwala |first14=S. R. |last15=Halpern |first15=M. |date=2014-06-19 |title=Detection of B -Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2 |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 |journal=Physical Review Letters |language=en |volume=112 |issue=24 |page=241101 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 |pmid=24996078 |issn=0031-9007|arxiv=1403.3985 |bibcode=2014PhRvL.112x1101B }}</ref>
E-modes were first seen in 2002 by the [[Degree Angular Scale Interferometer]] (DASI).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kovac |first1=J. M. |last2=Leitch |first2=E. M. |last3=Pryke |first3=C. |last4=Carlstrom |first4=J. E. |last5=Halverson |first5=N. W. |last6=Holzapfel |first6=W. L. |date=December 2002 |title=Detection of polarization in the cosmic microwave background using DASI |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01269 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=420 |issue=6917 |pages=772–787 |doi=10.1038/nature01269 |pmid=12490941 |issn=0028-0836|arxiv=astro-ph/0209478 |bibcode=2002Natur.420..772K }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ade |first1=P. A. R. |last2=Aikin |first2=R. W. |last3=Barkats |first3=D. |last4=Benton |first4=S. J. |last5=Bischoff |first5=C. A. |last6=Bock |first6=J. J. |last7=Brevik |first7=J. A. |last8=Buder |first8=I. |last9=Bullock |first9=E. |last10=Dowell |first10=C. D. |last11=Duband |first11=L. |last12=Filippini |first12=J. P. |last13=Fliescher |first13=S. |last14=Golwala |first14=S. R. |last15=Halpern |first15=M. |date=2014-06-19 |title=Detection of B -Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2 |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 |journal=Physical Review Letters |language=en |volume=112 |issue=24 |article-number=241101 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 |pmid=24996078 |issn=0031-9007|arxiv=1403.3985 |bibcode=2014PhRvL.112x1101B }}</ref>


=== B-modes ===
=== B-modes ===
B-modes are expected to be an order of magnitude weaker than the E-modes. The former are not produced by standard scalar type perturbations, but are generated by [[gravitational wave]]s during [[inflation (cosmology)|cosmic inflation]] shortly after the big bang.<ref name=SeljakMeasuring>{{cite journal|first=U.|last=Seljak|title=Measuring Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background|journal=Astrophysical Journal|date=June 1997|volume=482|issue=1|pages=6–16|doi=10.1086/304123|arxiv = astro-ph/9608131 |bibcode = 1997ApJ...482....6S |s2cid=16825580}}</ref><ref name=SeljakSignature>{{cite journal|first=U.|last=Seljak|author2=Zaldarriaga M.|title=Signature of Gravity Waves in the Polarization of the Microwave Background|journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.|date=March 17, 1997|volume=78|issue=11|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054|arxiv = astro-ph/9609169 |bibcode = 1997PhRvL..78.2054S|pages=2054–2057|s2cid=30795875}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|first=M.|last=Kamionkowski|author2= Kosowsky A.|author3= Stebbins A.|name-list-style= amp|title=A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity|journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.|year=1997|volume=78|issue=11|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058|arxiv = astro-ph/9609132 |bibcode = 1997PhRvL..78.2058K|pages=2058–2061|s2cid=17330375}}</ref>
B-modes are expected to be an order of magnitude weaker than the E-modes. The former are not produced by standard scalar type perturbations, but are generated by [[gravitational wave]]s during [[inflation (cosmology)|cosmic inflation]] shortly after the Big Bang.<ref name=SeljakMeasuring>{{cite journal|first=U.|last=Seljak|title=Measuring Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background|journal=Astrophysical Journal|date=June 1997|volume=482|issue=1|pages=6–16|doi=10.1086/304123|arxiv = astro-ph/9608131 |bibcode = 1997ApJ...482....6S |s2cid=16825580}}</ref><ref name=SeljakSignature>{{cite journal|first=U.|last=Seljak|author2=Zaldarriaga M.|title=Signature of Gravity Waves in the Polarization of the Microwave Background|journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.|date=March 17, 1997|volume=78|issue=11|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054|arxiv = astro-ph/9609169 |bibcode = 1997PhRvL..78.2054S|pages=2054–2057|s2cid=30795875}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|first=M.|last=Kamionkowski|author2= Kosowsky A.|author3= Stebbins A.|name-list-style= amp|title=A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity|journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.|year=1997|volume=78|issue=11|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058|arxiv = astro-ph/9609132 |bibcode = 1997PhRvL..78.2058K|pages=2058–2061|s2cid=17330375}}</ref>
However, gravitational lensing of the stronger E-modes can also produce B-mode polarization.<ref name=SeljakGraviational>{{cite journal|first=M.|last=Zaldarriaga|author2=Seljak U.|title=Gravitational lensing effect on cosmic microwave background polarization|journal=Physical Review D|date=July 15, 1998|volume=58|issue=2|pages=023003|series=2|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.58.023003|arxiv = astro-ph/9803150 |bibcode = 1998PhRvD..58b3003Z |s2cid=119512504}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Lewis|first1=A.|last2=Challinor|first2=A.|date=2006|title=Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB|journal=[[Physics Reports]]|volume=429|issue=1|pages=1–65|doi = 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002|arxiv=astro-ph/0601594|bibcode = 2006PhR...429....1L |s2cid=1731891}}</ref> Detecting the original B-modes signal requires analysis of the contamination caused by lensing of the relatively strong E-mode signal.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Hanson|first=D.|year=2013|title=Detection of B-mode polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background with data from the South Pole Telescope|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]|volume=111|issue=14|pages=141301|doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.141301|pmid=24138230|arxiv=1307.5830|url = http://www.nature.com/news/polarization-detected-in-big-bang-s-echo-1.13441 |bibcode = 2013PhRvL.111n1301H |s2cid=9437637|display-authors=etal}}</ref>
However, gravitational lensing of the stronger E-modes can also produce B-mode polarization.<ref name=SeljakGraviational>{{cite journal|first=M.|last=Zaldarriaga|author2=Seljak U.|title=Gravitational lensing effect on cosmic microwave background polarization|journal=Physical Review D|date=July 15, 1998|volume=58|issue=2|article-number=023003|series=2|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.58.023003|arxiv = astro-ph/9803150 |bibcode = 1998PhRvD..58b3003Z |s2cid=119512504}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Lewis|first1=A.|last2=Challinor|first2=A.|date=2006|title=Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB|journal=[[Physics Reports]]|volume=429|issue=1|pages=1–65|doi = 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002|arxiv=astro-ph/0601594|bibcode = 2006PhR...429....1L |s2cid=1731891}}</ref> Detecting the original B-modes signal requires analysis of the contamination caused by lensing of the relatively strong E-mode signal.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Hanson|first=D.|year=2013|title=Detection of B-mode polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background with data from the South Pole Telescope|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]|volume=111|issue=14|article-number=141301|doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.141301|pmid=24138230|arxiv=1307.5830|url = http://www.nature.com/news/polarization-detected-in-big-bang-s-echo-1.13441 |bibcode = 2013PhRvL.111n1301H |s2cid=9437637|display-authors=etal}}</ref>


==== Primordial gravitational waves ====
==== Primordial gravitational waves ====
Models of "slow-roll" [[cosmic inflation]] in the [[early universe]] predicts primordial [[gravitational waves]] that would impact the polarisation of the cosmic microwave background, creating a specific pattern of [[Polarization (cosmology)|B-mode polarization]]. Detection of this pattern would support the theory of inflation and their strength can confirm and exclude different models of inflation.<ref name=SeljakSignature/><ref name="KamionkowskiReview">{{Cite journal |last1=Kamionkowski |first1=Marc |last2=Kovetz |first2=Ely D. |date=2016-09-19 |title=The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves |url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023433 |journal=Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics |language=en |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=227–269 |doi=10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023433 |issn=0066-4146|arxiv=1510.06042 |bibcode=2016ARA&A..54..227K }}</ref>
Models of "slow-roll" [[cosmic inflation]] in the [[early universe]] predicts primordial [[gravitational waves]] that would impact the polarisation of the cosmic microwave background, creating a specific pattern of [[Polarization (cosmology)|B-mode polarization]]. Detection of this pattern would support the theory of inflation and their strength can confirm and exclude different models of inflation.<ref name=SeljakSignature/><ref name="KamionkowskiReview">{{Cite journal |last1=Kamionkowski |first1=Marc |last2=Kovetz |first2=Ely D. |date=2016-09-19 |title=The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves |url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023433 |journal=Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics |language=en |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=227–269 |doi=10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023433 |issn=0066-4146|arxiv=1510.06042 |bibcode=2016ARA&A..54..227K }}</ref>
While claims that this characteristic pattern of B-mode polarization had been measured by [[BICEP and Keck Array|BICEP2]] instrument<ref name="NYT-20140922"/> were later attributed to [[cosmic dust]] due to new results of the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck experiment]],<ref name="AXV-20140919">{{Cite journal |author=Planck Collaboration Team |title=Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes |date=9 February 2016 |arxiv=1409.5738 | journal = Astronomy & Astrophysics | volume = 586 |issue=133 | doi = 10.1051/0004-6361/201425034 | pages=A133 | bibcode=2016A&A...586A.133P|s2cid=9857299 }}<!--|access-date=22 September 2014 --></ref><ref name="KamionkowskiReview"/>{{rp|253}} subsequent reanalysis with compensation for foreground dust show limits in agreement with results from [[Lambda-CDM]] models.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=BICEP/Keck Collaboration |last2=Ade |first2=P. A. R. |last3=Ahmed |first3=Z. |last4=Amiri |first4=M. |last5=Barkats |first5=D. |last6=Thakur |first6=R. Basu |last7=Bischoff |first7=C. A. |last8=Beck |first8=D. |last9=Bock |first9=J. J. |last10=Boenish |first10=H. |last11=Bullock |first11=E. |last12=Buza |first12=V. |last13=Cheshire |first13=J. R. |last14=Connors |first14=J. |last15=Cornelison |first15=J. |date=2021-10-04 |title=Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301 |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=127 |issue=15 |pages=151301 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301|arxiv=2110.00483 }}</ref>
While claims that this characteristic pattern of B-mode polarization had been measured by [[BICEP and Keck Array|BICEP2]] instrument<ref name="NYT-20140922"/> were later attributed to [[cosmic dust]] due to new results of the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck experiment]],<ref name="AXV-20140919">{{Cite journal |author=Planck Collaboration Team |title=Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes |date=9 February 2016 |arxiv=1409.5738 | journal = Astronomy & Astrophysics | volume = 586 |issue=133 | doi = 10.1051/0004-6361/201425034 | pages=A133 | bibcode=2016A&A...586A.133P|s2cid=9857299 }}<!--|access-date=22 September 2014 --></ref><ref name="KamionkowskiReview"/>{{rp|253}} subsequent reanalysis with compensation for foreground dust show limits in agreement with results from [[Lambda-CDM]] models.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=BICEP/Keck Collaboration |last2=Ade |first2=P. A. R. |last3=Ahmed |first3=Z. |last4=Amiri |first4=M. |last5=Barkats |first5=D. |last6=Thakur |first6=R. Basu |last7=Bischoff |first7=C. A. |last8=Beck |first8=D. |last9=Bock |first9=J. J. |last10=Boenish |first10=H. |last11=Bullock |first11=E. |last12=Buza |first12=V. |last13=Cheshire |first13=J. R. |last14=Connors |first14=J. |last15=Cornelison |first15=J. |date=2021-10-04 |title=Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301 |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=127 |issue=15 |article-number=151301 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301|pmid=34678017 |arxiv=2110.00483 |bibcode=2021PhRvL.127o1301A }}</ref>


==== Gravitational lensing ====
==== Gravitational lensing ====
Line 202: Line 202:


==Multipole analysis==
==Multipole analysis==
[[File:WMAP 2008 TT spectra.png|thumb|Example Multipole Power Spectrum. WMAP Data are represented as points, curves correspond to the best-fit LCDM model<ref name="WMAP9Cosmo">{{Cite journal |last1=Hinshaw |first1=G. |last2=Larson |first2=D. |last3=Komatsu |first3=E. |last4=Spergel |first4=D. N. |last5=Bennett |first5=C. L. |last6=Dunkley |first6=J. |last7=Nolta |first7=M. R. |last8=Halpern |first8=M. |last9=Hill |first9=R. S. |last10=Odegard |first10=N. |last11=Page |first11=L. |last12=Smith |first12=K. M. |last13=Weiland |first13=J. L. |last14=Gold |first14=B. |last15=Jarosik |first15=N. |date=2013-09-20 |title=NINE-YEAR ''WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE'' ( ''WMAP'' ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 |journal=The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series |volume=208 |issue=2 |pages=19 |doi=10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 |issn=0067-0049|arxiv=1212.5226 |bibcode=2013ApJS..208...19H }}</ref>]]
[[File:WMAP 2008 TT spectra.png|thumb|Example Multipole Power Spectrum. WMAP Data are represented as points, curves correspond to the best-fit LCDM model<ref name="WMAP9Cosmo">{{Cite journal |last1=Hinshaw |first1=G. |last2=Larson |first2=D. |last3=Komatsu |first3=E. |last4=Spergel |first4=D. N. |last5=Bennett |first5=C. L. |last6=Dunkley |first6=J. |last7=Nolta |first7=M. R. |last8=Halpern |first8=M. |last9=Hill |first9=R. S. |last10=Odegard |first10=N. |last11=Page |first11=L. |last12=Smith |first12=K. M. |last13=Weiland |first13=J. L. |last14=Gold |first14=B. |last15=Jarosik |first15=N. |date=2013-09-20 |title=NINE-YEAR ''WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE'' ( ''WMAP'' ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 |journal=The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series |volume=208 |issue=2 |page=19 |doi=10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 |issn=0067-0049|arxiv=1212.5226 |bibcode=2013ApJS..208...19H }}</ref>]]
The CMB angular anisotropies are usually presented in terms of power per multipole.<ref name="cmbreview">{{cite journal |author1=P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group) |title=Review of Particle Physics |journal=Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics |date=2020 |volume=2020 |issue=8 |page=083C01 |doi=10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 |url=https://pdg.lbl.gov/2020/reviews/rpp2020-rev-cosmic-microwave-background.pdf|doi-access=free }} Cosmic Microwave Background review by Scott and Smoot.</ref>
The CMB angular anisotropies are usually presented in terms of power per multipole.<ref name="cmbreview">{{cite journal |author1=P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group) |title=Review of Particle Physics |journal=Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics |date=2020 |volume=2020 |issue=8 |article-number=083C01 |doi=10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 |url=https://pdg.lbl.gov/2020/reviews/rpp2020-rev-cosmic-microwave-background.pdf|doi-access=free }} Cosmic Microwave Background review by Scott and Smoot.</ref>
The map of temperature across the sky, <math>T(\theta,\varphi),</math> is written as coefficients of [[spherical harmonics]],
The map of temperature across the sky, <math>T(\theta,\varphi),</math> is written as coefficients of [[spherical harmonics]],
<math display="block">T(\theta,\varphi) = \sum_{\ell m} a_{\ell m} Y_{\ell m}(\theta,\varphi)</math>
<math display="block">T(\theta,\varphi) = \sum_{\ell m} a_{\ell m} Y_{\ell m}(\theta,\varphi)</math>
Line 223: Line 223:
{{See also|Cosmological principle|Axis of evil (cosmology)|CMB cold spot}}
{{See also|Cosmological principle|Axis of evil (cosmology)|CMB cold spot}}


With the increasingly precise data provided by WMAP, there have been a number of claims that the CMB exhibits anomalies, such as very large scale anisotropies, anomalous alignments, and non-Gaussian distributions.<ref name="arXiv:0905.2854v2">{{cite journal| last1=Rossmanith |first1=G. |year=2009 |title=Non-Gaussian Signatures in the five-year WMAP data as identified with isotropic scaling indices |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15421.x| journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society|volume=399|issue=4| pages=1921–1933|arxiv=0905.2854|bibcode = 2009MNRAS.399.1921R |last2=Räth |first2=C. |last3=Banday|first3=A. J.|last4=Morfill| first4=G. |doi-access=free |s2cid=11586058 }}</ref><ref name="arXiv:astro-ph/0511666">{{cite journal| last1=Bernui| first1=A. |year=2007 |title=Mapping the large-scale anisotropy in the WMAP data| doi=10.1051/0004-6361:20065585 |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics| volume=464 |issue=2 |pages=479–485 |arxiv=astro-ph/0511666 |bibcode = 2007A&A...464..479B |last2=Mota |first2=B. |last3=Rebouças|first3=M. J.| last4=Tavakol|first4=R.| s2cid=16138962 }}</ref><ref name="arXiv:astro-ph/0503213">{{cite journal|last1=Jaffe|first1=T.R.| year=2005|title=Evidence of vorticity and shear at large angular scales in the WMAP data: a violation of cosmological isotropy?| doi=10.1086/444454|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=629 | issue=1| pages=L1–L4|arxiv=astro-ph/0503213|bibcode = 2005ApJ...629L...1J |last2=Banday |first2=A. J. | last3=Eriksen|first3=H. K. | last4=Górski|first4=K. M.| last5=Hansen|first5=F. K.|s2cid=15521559}}</ref> The most longstanding of these is the low-''ℓ'' multipole controversy. Even in the COBE map, it was observed that the [[quadrupole]] ({{nowrap|1=''ℓ'' = 2}}, spherical harmonic) has a low amplitude compared to the predictions of the Big Bang. In particular, the quadrupole and octupole ({{nowrap|1=''ℓ'' = 3}}) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with each other and with both the [[plane of the ecliptic|ecliptic plane]] and [[equinox]]es.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=de Oliveira-Costa |first1=A. |year=2004 |title=The significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=69 |pages=063516 | doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 |arxiv=astro-ph/0307282 |bibcode = 2004PhRvD..69f3516D |issue=6 |last2=Tegmark |first2=Max |last3=Zaldarriaga |first3=Matias |last4=Hamilton |first4=Andrew| s2cid=119463060 |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/628847 |type=Submitted manuscript }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Schwarz|first1=D. J.|date=2004|title=Is the low-''ℓ'' microwave background cosmic?| journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]| volume=93| pages=221301| doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.221301| pmid=15601079| arxiv=astro-ph/0403353| bibcode=2004PhRvL..93v1301S |issue=22 | last2=Starkman |first2=Glenn D. |last3=Huterer|first3=Dragan|last4=Copi|first4=Craig|s2cid=12554281|display-authors=2|url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/725179|type=Submitted manuscript}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Bielewicz| first1=P.|last2=Gorski|first2=K. M.|last3=Banday|first3=A. J.|date=2004 |title=Low-order multipole maps of CMB anisotropy derived from WMAP|journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]] |volume=355|pages=1283–1302 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08405.x | arxiv=astro-ph/0405007 |bibcode=2004MNRAS.355.1283B |issue=4 | doi-access=free|s2cid=5564564}}</ref> A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of quantum corrections or new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Cao |first=F. J. |last2=de Vega |first2=H. J. |last3=Sánchez |first3=N. G. |date=2004-10-22 |title=Quantum inflaton, primordial perturbations, and CMB fluctuations |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083528 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=70 |issue=8 |pages=083528 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083528|url-access=subscription |arxiv=astro-ph/0406168 }}</ref><ref name="arXiv:0907.2731v3">{{cite arXiv |last1=Liu|first1=Hao|last2=Li|first2=Ti-Pei|date=2009|title=Improved CMB Map from WMAP Data|class=astro-ph |eprint=0907.2731v3}}</ref><ref name="arXiv:1006.1270v1">{{cite arXiv|last1=Sawangwit|first1=Utane|last2=Shanks|first2=Tom|date=2010|title=Lambda-CDM and the WMAP Power Spectrum Beam Profile Sensitivity|class=astro-ph |eprint=1006.1270v1}}</ref><ref name="arXiv:1009.2701v1">{{cite journal |last=Liu|first=Hao|date=2010|title=Diagnosing Timing Error in WMAP Data |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters |volume=413 |issue=1|pages=L96–L100|arxiv=1009.2701v1 |display-authors=etal |bibcode=2011MNRAS.413L..96L| doi=10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01041.x |doi-access=free |s2cid=118739762}}</ref>
With the increasingly precise data provided by WMAP, there have been a number of claims that the CMB exhibits anomalies, such as very large scale anisotropies, anomalous alignments, and non-Gaussian distributions.<ref name="arXiv:0905.2854v2">{{cite journal| last1=Rossmanith |first1=G. |year=2009 |title=Non-Gaussian Signatures in the five-year WMAP data as identified with isotropic scaling indices |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15421.x| journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society|volume=399|issue=4| pages=1921–1933|arxiv=0905.2854|bibcode = 2009MNRAS.399.1921R |last2=Räth |first2=C. |last3=Banday|first3=A. J.|last4=Morfill| first4=G. |doi-access=free |s2cid=11586058 }}</ref><ref name="arXiv:astro-ph/0511666">{{cite journal| last1=Bernui| first1=A. |year=2007 |title=Mapping the large-scale anisotropy in the WMAP data| doi=10.1051/0004-6361:20065585 |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics| volume=464 |issue=2 |pages=479–485 |arxiv=astro-ph/0511666 |bibcode = 2007A&A...464..479B |last2=Mota |first2=B. |last3=Rebouças|first3=M. J.| last4=Tavakol|first4=R.| s2cid=16138962 }}</ref><ref name="arXiv:astro-ph/0503213">{{cite journal|last1=Jaffe|first1=T.R.| year=2005|title=Evidence of vorticity and shear at large angular scales in the WMAP data: a violation of cosmological isotropy?| doi=10.1086/444454|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=629 | issue=1| pages=L1–L4|arxiv=astro-ph/0503213|bibcode = 2005ApJ...629L...1J |last2=Banday |first2=A. J. | last3=Eriksen|first3=H. K. | last4=Górski|first4=K. M.| last5=Hansen|first5=F. K.|s2cid=15521559}}</ref> The most longstanding of these is the low-''ℓ'' multipole controversy. Even in the COBE map, it was observed that the [[quadrupole]] ({{nowrap|1=''ℓ'' = 2}}, spherical harmonic) has a low amplitude compared to the predictions of the Big Bang. In particular, the quadrupole and octupole ({{nowrap|1=''ℓ'' = 3}}) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with each other and with both the [[plane of the ecliptic|ecliptic plane]] and [[equinox]]es.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=de Oliveira-Costa |first1=A. |year=2004 |title=The significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=69 |article-number=063516 | doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 |arxiv=astro-ph/0307282 |bibcode = 2004PhRvD..69f3516D |issue=6 |last2=Tegmark |first2=Max |last3=Zaldarriaga |first3=Matias |last4=Hamilton |first4=Andrew| s2cid=119463060 |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/628847 |type=Submitted manuscript }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Schwarz|first1=D. J.|date=2004|title=Is the low-''ℓ'' microwave background cosmic?| journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]| volume=93| article-number=221301| doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.221301| pmid=15601079| arxiv=astro-ph/0403353| bibcode=2004PhRvL..93v1301S |issue=22 | last2=Starkman |first2=Glenn D. |last3=Huterer|first3=Dragan|last4=Copi|first4=Craig|s2cid=12554281|display-authors=2|url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/725179|type=Submitted manuscript}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Bielewicz| first1=P.|last2=Gorski|first2=K. M.|last3=Banday|first3=A. J.|date=2004 |title=Low-order multipole maps of CMB anisotropy derived from WMAP|journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]] |volume=355|pages=1283–1302 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08405.x | arxiv=astro-ph/0405007 |bibcode=2004MNRAS.355.1283B |issue=4 | doi-access=free|s2cid=5564564}}</ref> A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of quantum corrections or new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Cao |first1=F. J. |last2=de Vega |first2=H. J. |last3=Sánchez |first3=N. G. |date=2004-10-22 |title=Quantum inflaton, primordial perturbations, and CMB fluctuations |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083528 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=70 |issue=8 |article-number=083528 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083528|url-access=subscription |arxiv=astro-ph/0406168 |bibcode=2004PhRvD..70h3528C }}</ref><ref name="arXiv:0907.2731v3">{{cite arXiv |last1=Liu|first1=Hao|last2=Li|first2=Ti-Pei|date=2009|title=Improved CMB Map from WMAP Data|class=astro-ph |eprint=0907.2731v3}}</ref><ref name="arXiv:1006.1270v1">{{cite arXiv|last1=Sawangwit|first1=Utane|last2=Shanks|first2=Tom|date=2010|title=Lambda-CDM and the WMAP Power Spectrum Beam Profile Sensitivity|class=astro-ph |eprint=1006.1270v1}}</ref><ref name="arXiv:1009.2701v1">{{cite journal |last=Liu|first=Hao|date=2010|title=Diagnosing Timing Error in WMAP Data |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters |volume=413 |issue=1|pages=L96–L100|arxiv=1009.2701v1 |display-authors=etal |bibcode=2011MNRAS.413L..96L| doi=10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01041.x |doi-access=free |s2cid=118739762}}</ref>


Ultimately, due to the foregrounds and the [[cosmic variance]] problem, the greatest modes will never be as well measured as the small angular scale modes. The analyses were performed on two maps that have had the foregrounds removed as far as possible: the "internal linear combination" map of the WMAP collaboration and a similar map prepared by [[Max Tegmark]] and others.<ref name="hinshaw07">{{cite journal|last=Hinshaw|first=G.|author2= (WMAP collaboration)|year=2007|title=Three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: temperature analysis|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series]]|volume=170|issue=2|pages=288–334|doi=10.1086/513698|arxiv=astro-ph/0603451|bibcode=2007ApJS..170..288H|last3=Bennett|first3=C. L.|last4=Bean|first4=R.|author-link4=Rachel Bean|last5=Doré|first5=O.|last6=Greason|first6=M. R.|last7=Halpern|first7=M.|last8=Hill|first8=R. S.| last9=Jarosik| first9=N.| last10=Kogut| first10=A.| last11=Komatsu|first11=E.|last12=Limon|first12=M.|last13=Odegard|first13=N.|last14=Meyer|first14=S. S.| last15=Page |first15=L. |last16=Peiris |first16=H. V.|last17=Spergel|first17=D. N.|last18=Tucker|first18=G. S.| last19=Verde| first19=L.| last20 =Weiland|first20=J. L.|last21=Wollack|first21=E.|last22=Wright|first22=E. L.|display-authors=etal| citeseerx=10.1.1.471.7186|s2cid=15554608}}</ref><ref name="FirstWMAP">
Ultimately, due to the foregrounds and the [[cosmic variance]] problem, the greatest modes will never be as well measured as the small angular scale modes. The analyses were performed on two maps that have had the foregrounds removed as far as possible: the "internal linear combination" map of the WMAP collaboration and a similar map prepared by [[Max Tegmark]] and others.<ref name="hinshaw07">{{cite journal|last=Hinshaw|first=G.|author2= (WMAP collaboration)|year=2007|title=Three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: temperature analysis|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series]]|volume=170|issue=2|pages=288–334|doi=10.1086/513698|arxiv=astro-ph/0603451|bibcode=2007ApJS..170..288H|last3=Bennett|first3=C. L.|last4=Bean|first4=R.|author-link4=Rachel Bean|last5=Doré|first5=O.|last6=Greason|first6=M. R.|last7=Halpern|first7=M.|last8=Hill|first8=R. S.| last9=Jarosik| first9=N.| last10=Kogut| first10=A.| last11=Komatsu|first11=E.|last12=Limon|first12=M.|last13=Odegard|first13=N.|last14=Meyer|first14=S. S.| last15=Page |first15=L. |last16=Peiris |first16=H. V.|last17=Spergel|first17=D. N.|last18=Tucker|first18=G. S.| last19=Verde| first19=L.| last20 =Weiland|first20=J. L.|last21=Wollack|first21=E.|last22=Wright|first22=E. L.|display-authors=etal| citeseerx=10.1.1.471.7186|s2cid=15554608}}</ref><ref name="FirstWMAP">
{{cite journal|last=Bennett|first=C. L.|author2= (WMAP collaboration)|year=2003|title=First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: preliminary maps and basic results|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series]]|volume=148|issue=1|pages=1–27|doi=10.1086/377253|arxiv=astro-ph/0302207| bibcode=2003ApJS..148....1B| last3=Hinshaw|first3=G.| last4=Jarosik| first4=N.|last5=Kogut| first5=A.| last6=Limon|first6=M.|last7=Meyer|first7=S. S.|last8=Page|first8=L.|last9=Spergel|first9=D. N.|last10=Tucker|first10=G. S.| last11=Wollack |first11=E.| last12=Wright|first12=E. L.|last13=Barnes|first13=C.|last14=Greason|first14=M. R.|last15=Hill|first15=R. S.| last16=Komatsu |first16=E.| last17=Nolta| first17=M. R.|last18=Odegard|first18=N.|last19=Peiris|first19=H. V.|last20=Verde|first20=L.|last21=Weiland|first21=J. L.|s2cid=115601|display-authors=etal}} This paper warns that "the statistics of this internal linear combination map are complex and inappropriate for most CMB analyses."</ref><ref>
{{cite journal|last=Bennett|first=C. L.|author2= (WMAP collaboration)|year=2003|title=First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: preliminary maps and basic results|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series]]|volume=148|issue=1|pages=1–27|doi=10.1086/377253|arxiv=astro-ph/0302207| bibcode=2003ApJS..148....1B| last3=Hinshaw|first3=G.| last4=Jarosik| first4=N.|last5=Kogut| first5=A.| last6=Limon|first6=M.|last7=Meyer|first7=S. S.|last8=Page|first8=L.|last9=Spergel|first9=D. N.|last10=Tucker|first10=G. S.| last11=Wollack |first11=E.| last12=Wright|first12=E. L.|last13=Barnes|first13=C.|last14=Greason|first14=M. R.|last15=Hill|first15=R. S.| last16=Komatsu |first16=E.| last17=Nolta| first17=M. R.|last18=Odegard|first18=N.|last19=Peiris|first19=H. V.|last20=Verde|first20=L.|last21=Weiland|first21=J. L.|s2cid=115601|display-authors=etal}} This paper warns that "the statistics of this internal linear combination map are complex and inappropriate for most CMB analyses."</ref><ref>
{{cite journal|last1=Tegmark|first1=M.|last2=de Oliveira-Costa|first2=A.|last3=Hamilton|first3=A.|year=2003|title=A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=68|pages=123523|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123523|arxiv=astro-ph/0302496|bibcode = 2003PhRvD..68l3523T|issue=12 |s2cid=17981329}} This paper states, "Not surprisingly, the two most contaminated multipoles are [the quadrupole and octupole], which most closely trace the galactic plane morphology."</ref> Later analyses have pointed out that these are the modes most susceptible to foreground contamination from synchrotron, dust, and bremsstrahlung emission, and from experimental uncertainty in the monopole and dipole.
{{cite journal|last1=Tegmark|first1=M.|last2=de Oliveira-Costa|first2=A.|last3=Hamilton|first3=A.|year=2003|title=A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=68|article-number=123523|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123523|arxiv=astro-ph/0302496|bibcode = 2003PhRvD..68l3523T|issue=12 |s2cid=17981329}} This paper states, "Not surprisingly, the two most contaminated multipoles are [the quadrupole and octupole], which most closely trace the galactic plane morphology."</ref> Later analyses have pointed out that these are the modes most susceptible to foreground contamination from synchrotron, dust, and bremsstrahlung emission, and from experimental uncertainty in the monopole and dipole.


A full [[Bayesian analysis]] of the WMAP power spectrum demonstrates that the quadrupole prediction of [[Lambda-CDM model|Lambda-CDM cosmology]] is consistent with the data at the 10% level and that the observed octupole is not remarkable.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=O'Dwyer|first1=I.|date=2004|title=Bayesian Power Spectrum Analysis of the First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal Letters]]|volume=617|pages=L99–L102|doi=10.1086/427386|arxiv=astro-ph/0407027|bibcode=2004ApJ...617L..99O|issue=2|last2=Eriksen |first2=H. K. |last3=Wandelt|first3=B. D.|last4=Jewell|first4=J. B.|last5=Larson|first5=D. L.|last6=Górski|first6=K. M.|last7=Banday|first7=A. J.|last8=Levin|first8=S.|last9=Lilje|first9=P. B. |s2cid=118150531 }}</ref> Carefully accounting for the procedure used to remove the foregrounds from the full sky map further reduces the significance of the alignment by ~5%.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Slosar|first1=A.|last2=Seljak|first2=U.|date=2004|title=Assessing the effects of foregrounds and sky removal in WMAP|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=70|pages=083002|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083002|arxiv=astro-ph/0404567|bibcode = 2004PhRvD..70h3002S|issue=8|s2cid=119443655|url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/732816|type=Submitted manuscript}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Bielewicz|first1=P.|year=2005|title=Multipole vector anomalies in the first-year WMAP data: a cut-sky analysis|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=635|pages=750–60|doi=10.1086/497263|arxiv=astro-ph/0507186|bibcode=2005ApJ...635..750B|issue=2|last2=Eriksen |first2=H. K. |last3=Banday|first3=A. J.|last4=Górski|first4=K. M.|last5=Lilje|first5=P. B. |s2cid=1103733}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Copi |first1=C.J. |year=2006|title=On the large-angle anomalies of the microwave sky|journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]]|volume=367|issue=1 |pages=79–102|doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09980.x|arxiv=astro-ph/0508047 |bibcode=2006MNRAS.367...79C|last2=Huterer |first2=Dragan |last3=Schwarz |first3=D. J. |last4=Starkman |first4=G. D. |doi-access=free |citeseerx=10.1.1.490.6391 |s2cid=6184966 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=de Oliveira-Costa|first1=A.| last2=Tegmark| first2=M.|year=2006|title=CMB multipole measurements in the presence of foregrounds|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=74| pages=023005|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.74.023005|arxiv=astro-ph/0603369|bibcode = 2006PhRvD..74b3005D| issue=2|s2cid=5238226|url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/934594|type=Submitted manuscript}}</ref>
A full [[Bayesian analysis]] of the WMAP power spectrum demonstrates that the quadrupole prediction of [[Lambda-CDM model|Lambda-CDM cosmology]] is consistent with the data at the 10% level and that the observed octupole is not remarkable.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=O'Dwyer|first1=I.|date=2004|title=Bayesian Power Spectrum Analysis of the First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal Letters]]|volume=617|pages=L99–L102|doi=10.1086/427386|arxiv=astro-ph/0407027|bibcode=2004ApJ...617L..99O|issue=2|last2=Eriksen |first2=H. K. |last3=Wandelt|first3=B. D.|last4=Jewell|first4=J. B.|last5=Larson|first5=D. L.|last6=Górski|first6=K. M.|last7=Banday|first7=A. J.|last8=Levin|first8=S.|last9=Lilje|first9=P. B. |s2cid=118150531 }}</ref> Carefully accounting for the procedure used to remove the foregrounds from the full sky map further reduces the significance of the alignment by ~5%.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Slosar|first1=A.|last2=Seljak|first2=U.|date=2004|title=Assessing the effects of foregrounds and sky removal in WMAP|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=70|article-number=083002|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083002|arxiv=astro-ph/0404567|bibcode = 2004PhRvD..70h3002S|issue=8|s2cid=119443655|url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/732816|type=Submitted manuscript}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Bielewicz|first1=P.|year=2005|title=Multipole vector anomalies in the first-year WMAP data: a cut-sky analysis|journal=[[Astrophysical Journal]]|volume=635|pages=750–60|doi=10.1086/497263|arxiv=astro-ph/0507186|bibcode=2005ApJ...635..750B|issue=2|last2=Eriksen |first2=H. K. |last3=Banday|first3=A. J.|last4=Górski|first4=K. M.|last5=Lilje|first5=P. B. |s2cid=1103733}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Copi |first1=C.J. |year=2006|title=On the large-angle anomalies of the microwave sky|journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]]|volume=367|issue=1 |pages=79–102|doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09980.x|arxiv=astro-ph/0508047 |bibcode=2006MNRAS.367...79C|last2=Huterer |first2=Dragan |last3=Schwarz |first3=D. J. |last4=Starkman |first4=G. D. |doi-access=free |citeseerx=10.1.1.490.6391 |s2cid=6184966 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=de Oliveira-Costa|first1=A.| last2=Tegmark| first2=M.|year=2006|title=CMB multipole measurements in the presence of foregrounds|journal=[[Physical Review D]]|volume=74| article-number=023005|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.74.023005|arxiv=astro-ph/0603369|bibcode = 2006PhRvD..74b3005D| issue=2|s2cid=5238226|url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/934594|type=Submitted manuscript}}</ref>
Recent observations with the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]], which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, record the same anomaly, and so instrumental error (but not foreground contamination) appears to be ruled out.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23301-planck-shows-almost-perfect-cosmos--plus-axis-of-evil.html| title = Planck shows almost perfect cosmos – plus axis of evil}}</ref> Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from [[WMAP]], [[Charles L. Bennett]] suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, "I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things."<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18489-found-hawkings-initials-written-into-the-universe.html| title = Found: Hawking's initials written into the universe}}</ref>
Recent observations with the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]], which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, record the same anomaly, and so instrumental error (but not foreground contamination) appears to be ruled out.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23301-planck-shows-almost-perfect-cosmos--plus-axis-of-evil.html| title = Planck shows almost perfect cosmos – plus axis of evil}}</ref> Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from [[WMAP]], [[Charles L. Bennett]] suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, "I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things."<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18489-found-hawkings-initials-written-into-the-universe.html| title = Found: Hawking's initials written into the universe}}</ref>


Measurements of the density of quasars based on [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer]] data finds a dipole significantly different from the one extracted from the CMB anisotropy.<ref name="SuburSarkar">{{cite journal |title=A Test of the Cosmological Principle with Quasars|journal=The Astrophysical Journal Letters|year=2021|doi=10.3847/2041-8213/abdd40|last1=Secrest|first1=Nathan J.|last2=Hausegger|first2=Sebastian von|last3=Rameez|first3=Mohamed|last4=Mohayaee|first4=Roya|last5=Sarkar|first5=Subir|last6=Colin|first6=Jacques|volume=908|issue=2|pages=L51|arxiv=2009.14826|bibcode=2021ApJ...908L..51S|s2cid=222066749 |doi-access=free }}</ref> This difference is conflict with the [[cosmological principle]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Perivolaropoulos |first1=L. |last2=Skara |first2=F. |date=2022-12-01 |title=Challenges for ΛCDM: An update |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387647322000185 |journal=New Astronomy Reviews |volume=95 |pages=101659 |doi=10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 |issn=1387-6473|arxiv=2105.05208 |bibcode=2022NewAR..9501659P }}</ref>
Measurements of the density of quasars based on [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer]] data finds a dipole significantly different from the one extracted from the CMB anisotropy.<ref name="SuburSarkar">{{cite journal |title=A Test of the Cosmological Principle with Quasars|journal=The Astrophysical Journal Letters|year=2021|doi=10.3847/2041-8213/abdd40|last1=Secrest|first1=Nathan J.|last2=Hausegger|first2=Sebastian von|last3=Rameez|first3=Mohamed|last4=Mohayaee|first4=Roya|last5=Sarkar|first5=Subir|last6=Colin|first6=Jacques|volume=908|issue=2|pages=L51|arxiv=2009.14826|bibcode=2021ApJ...908L..51S|s2cid=222066749 |doi-access=free }}</ref> This difference is in conflict with the [[cosmological principle]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Perivolaropoulos |first1=L. |last2=Skara |first2=F. |date=2022-12-01 |title=Challenges for ΛCDM: An update |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387647322000185 |journal=New Astronomy Reviews |volume=95 |article-number=101659 |doi=10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 |issn=1387-6473|arxiv=2105.05208 |bibcode=2022NewAR..9501659P }}</ref>


==Future evolution==
==Future evolution==
Line 246: Line 246:
  |volume=39 |issue=10 |pages=1545–1550
  |volume=39 |issue=10 |pages=1545–1550
|arxiv = 0704.0221 |s2cid=123442313
|arxiv = 0704.0221 |s2cid=123442313
  }}</ref> and will be superseded first by the one produced by [[starlight]], and perhaps, later by the background radiation fields of processes that may take place in the far future of the universe such as [[proton decay]], [[Hawking radiation|evaporation of black holes]], and [[positronium]] decay.<ref name="fate">
  }}</ref> and will be superseded first by the one produced by [[starlight]], and perhaps, later by the background radiation fields of processes that may take place in the far future of the universe such as [[proton decay]], [[Hawking radiation|evaporation of black holes]], [[positronium]] decay, or [[Unruh effect|Unruh-effect]] radiation associated with the [[particle horizon]].<ref name="fate">
{{cite journal
{{cite journal
  |bibcode=1997RvMP...69..337A
  |bibcode=1997RvMP...69..337A
Line 258: Line 258:
  |volume=69 |issue=2 |pages=337–372
  |volume=69 |issue=2 |pages=337–372
|s2cid= 12173790
|s2cid= 12173790
  }}</ref>
  }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Freese |first1=Katherine |last2=Kinney |first2=William H. |title=The ultimate fate of life in an accelerating universe |journal=Physics Letters B |date=April 2003 |volume=558 |issue=1–2 |pages=1–8 |doi=10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00239-9 |arxiv=astro-ph/0205279 |bibcode=2003PhLB..558....1F }}</ref>


== Timeline of prediction, discovery and interpretation ==
== Timeline of prediction, discovery and interpretation ==
Line 271: Line 271:
* 1946 – [[Robert Dicke]] predicts "... radiation from cosmic matter" at <&nbsp;20&nbsp;K, but did not refer to background radiation.<ref name=Kragh>
* 1946 – [[Robert Dicke]] predicts "... radiation from cosmic matter" at <&nbsp;20&nbsp;K, but did not refer to background radiation.<ref name=Kragh>
{{cite book|first=H.|last=Kragh|date=1999|title=Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe|publisher=Princeton University Press|url=https://archive.org/details/cosmologycontrov00helg|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/cosmologycontrov00helg/page/135 135]|isbn=978-0-691-00546-1}} "In 1946, Robert Dicke and coworkers at MIT tested equipment that could test a cosmic microwave background of intensity corresponding to about 20K in the microwave region. However, they did not refer to such a background, but only to 'radiation from cosmic matter'. Also, this work was unrelated to cosmology and is only mentioned because it suggests that by 1950, detection of the background radiation might have been technically possible, and also because of Dicke's later role in the discovery". See also {{cite journal|last=Dicke|first=R. H.|date=1946|title=Atmospheric Absorption Measurements with a Microwave Radiometer|journal=[[Physical Review]]|volume=70|issue=5–6|pages=340–348|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.70.340|bibcode = 1946PhRv...70..340D |display-authors=etal}}</ref>
{{cite book|first=H.|last=Kragh|date=1999|title=Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe|publisher=Princeton University Press|url=https://archive.org/details/cosmologycontrov00helg|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/cosmologycontrov00helg/page/135 135]|isbn=978-0-691-00546-1}} "In 1946, Robert Dicke and coworkers at MIT tested equipment that could test a cosmic microwave background of intensity corresponding to about 20K in the microwave region. However, they did not refer to such a background, but only to 'radiation from cosmic matter'. Also, this work was unrelated to cosmology and is only mentioned because it suggests that by 1950, detection of the background radiation might have been technically possible, and also because of Dicke's later role in the discovery". See also {{cite journal|last=Dicke|first=R. H.|date=1946|title=Atmospheric Absorption Measurements with a Microwave Radiometer|journal=[[Physical Review]]|volume=70|issue=5–6|pages=340–348|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.70.340|bibcode = 1946PhRv...70..340D |display-authors=etal}}</ref>
* 1946 – [[George Gamow]] calculates a temperature of 50&nbsp;K (assuming a 3-billion year old universe),<ref name="The Creation Of The Universe">George Gamow, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=5awirwgmvAoC&pg=PA40 The Creation Of The Universe]'' p.50 (Dover reprint of revised 1961 edition) {{ISBN|0-486-43868-6}}</ref> commenting it "... is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space", but does not mention background radiation.<ref>{{cite book|last=Gamow|first=G.|author-link=George Gamow|date=2004|orig-year=1961|title=Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe|page=40|publisher=[[Courier Dover Publications]]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5awirwgmvAoC&pg=PA40|isbn=978-0-486-43868-9}}</ref>
* 1946 – [[George Gamow]] calculates a temperature of 50&nbsp;K (assuming a 3-billion year old universe),<ref name="The Creation Of The Universe">George Gamow, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=5awirwgmvAoC&pg=PA40 The Creation Of The Universe]'' p.50 (Dover reprint of revised 1961 edition) {{ISBN|0-486-43868-6}}</ref> commenting it "... is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space", but does not mention background radiation.<ref>{{cite book|last=Gamow|first=G.|author-link=George Gamow|date=2004|orig-date=1961|title=Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe|page=40|publisher=[[Courier Dover Publications]]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5awirwgmvAoC&pg=PA40|isbn=978-0-486-43868-9}}</ref>
* 1953 – [[Erwin Finlay-Freundlich]] in support of his [[tired light]] theory, derives a blackbody temperature for intergalactic space of 2.3&nbsp;K and in the following year values of 1.9K and 6.0K.<ref>Erwin Finlay-Freundlich, "[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953CoStA...4...96F Ueber die Rotverschiebung der Spektrallinien]" (1953) ''Contributions from the Observatory, University of St. Andrews''; no. 4, p. 96–102. Finlay-Freundlich gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in Finlay-Freundlich, E.: 1954, "Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies", Phil. Mag., Vol. 45, pp. 303–319.</ref>
* 1953 – [[Erwin Finlay-Freundlich]] in support of his [[tired light]] theory, derives a blackbody temperature for intergalactic space of 2.3&nbsp;K and in the following year values of 1.9K and 6.0K.<ref>Erwin Finlay-Freundlich, "[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953CoStA...4...96F Ueber die Rotverschiebung der Spektrallinien]" (1953) ''Contributions from the Observatory, University of St. Andrews''; no. 4, p. 96–102. Finlay-Freundlich gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in Finlay-Freundlich, E.: 1954, "Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies", Phil. Mag., Vol. 45, pp. 303–319.</ref>


Line 280: Line 280:
* 1953 – [[George Gamow]] estimates 7&nbsp;K based on a model that does not rely on a free parameter<ref name=Kragh /><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Alpher |first1=Ralph A. |last2=Gamow |first2=George |last3=Herman |first3=Robert |date=December 1967 |title=Thermal Cosmic Radiation and the Formation of Protogalaxies |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |language=en |volume=58 |issue=6 |pages=2179–2186 |doi=10.1073/pnas.58.6.2179 |doi-access=free |issn=0027-8424 |pmc=223817 |pmid=16591578|bibcode=1967PNAS...58.2179A }}</ref>{{rp|2181}}
* 1953 – [[George Gamow]] estimates 7&nbsp;K based on a model that does not rely on a free parameter<ref name=Kragh /><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Alpher |first1=Ralph A. |last2=Gamow |first2=George |last3=Herman |first3=Robert |date=December 1967 |title=Thermal Cosmic Radiation and the Formation of Protogalaxies |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |language=en |volume=58 |issue=6 |pages=2179–2186 |doi=10.1073/pnas.58.6.2179 |doi-access=free |issn=0027-8424 |pmc=223817 |pmid=16591578|bibcode=1967PNAS...58.2179A }}</ref>{{rp|2181}}
* 1955 – Émile Le Roux of the [[Nançay Radio Observatory]], in a sky survey at ''λ'' = 33&nbsp;cm, initially reported a near-isotropic background radiation of 3 kelvins, plus or minus 2; he did not recognize the cosmological significance<ref name=Kragh /> {{rp|343}}<ref name=PartridgeReview/>{{rp|location=8.3.1}} and later revised the error bars to 20K.<ref>Delannoy, J., Denisse, J. F., Le Roux, E., & Morlet, B. (1957). Mesures absolues de faibles densités de flux de rayonnement à 900 MHz. Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 20, p. 222, 20, 222.</ref><ref name=WrightUCLASite>{{Cite web |last=Wright |first=Edward |title=Cosmic Microwave Background |url=https://astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CMB.html |access-date=2024-05-28 |website=astro.ucla.edu}}</ref>  
* 1955 – Émile Le Roux of the [[Nançay Radio Observatory]], in a sky survey at ''λ'' = 33&nbsp;cm, initially reported a near-isotropic background radiation of 3 kelvins, plus or minus 2; he did not recognize the cosmological significance<ref name=Kragh /> {{rp|343}}<ref name=PartridgeReview/>{{rp|location=8.3.1}} and later revised the error bars to 20K.<ref>Delannoy, J., Denisse, J. F., Le Roux, E., & Morlet, B. (1957). Mesures absolues de faibles densités de flux de rayonnement à 900 MHz. Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 20, p. 222, 20, 222.</ref><ref name=WrightUCLASite>{{Cite web |last=Wright |first=Edward |title=Cosmic Microwave Background |url=https://astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CMB.html |access-date=2024-05-28 |website=astro.ucla.edu}}</ref>  
* 1957 – Tigran Shmaonov reports that "the absolute effective temperature of the radioemission background ... is 4±3&nbsp;K".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Shmaonov|first=T. A.|date=1957|title=Commentary|language=ru|journal=[[Pribory I Tekhnika Experimenta]]|volume=1|pages=83|doi=10.1016/S0890-5096(06)60772-3}}</ref> with radiation intensity was independent of either time or direction of observation. Although Shamonov did not recognize it at the time, it is now clear that Shmaonov did observe the cosmic microwave background at a wavelength of 3.2&nbsp;cm<ref>{{cite book|last1=Naselsky|first1=P. D.|last2=Novikov|first2=D.I.|last3=Novikov|first3=I. D.|date=2006|title=The Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background|publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J2KCisZsWZ0C&pg=RA1-PA1|isbn=978-0-521-85550-1}}</ref>
* 1957 – Tigran Shmaonov reports that "the absolute effective temperature of the radioemission background ... is 4±3&nbsp;K".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Shmaonov|first=T. A.|date=1957|title=Commentary|language=ru|journal=[[Pribory I Tekhnika Experimenta]]|volume=1|page=83|doi=10.1016/S0890-5096(06)60772-3}}</ref> with radiation intensity was independent of either time or direction of observation. Although Shamonov did not recognize it at the time, it is now clear that Shmaonov did observe the cosmic microwave background at a wavelength of 3.2&nbsp;cm<ref>{{cite book|last1=Naselsky|first1=P. D.|last2=Novikov|first2=D.I.|last3=Novikov|first3=I. D.|date=2006|title=The Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background|publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J2KCisZsWZ0C&pg=RA1-PA1|isbn=978-0-521-85550-1}}</ref>
* 1964 – [[A. G. Doroshkevich]] and [[Igor Dmitrievich Novikov]] publish a brief paper suggesting microwave searches for the black-body radiation predicted by Gamow, Alpher, and Herman, where they name the CMB radiation phenomenon as detectable.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Doroshkevich|first1=A. G.|last2=Novikov|first2=I.D.|s2cid=96773397|date=1964|title=Mean Density of Radiation in the Metagalaxy and Certain Problems in Relativistic Cosmology|journal=[[Soviet Physics Doklady]]|volume=9|pages=4292–4298|doi=10.1021/es990537g|issue=23|bibcode = 1999EnST...33.4292W }}</ref>
* 1964 – [[A. G. Doroshkevich]] and [[Igor Dmitrievich Novikov]] publish a brief paper suggesting microwave searches for the black-body radiation predicted by Gamow, Alpher, and Herman, where they name the CMB radiation phenomenon as detectable.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Doroshkevich|first1=A. G.|last2=Novikov|first2=I.D.|s2cid=96773397|date=1964|title=Mean Density of Radiation in the Metagalaxy and Certain Problems in Relativistic Cosmology|journal=[[Soviet Physics Doklady]]|volume=9|pages=4292–4298|doi=10.1021/es990537g|issue=23|bibcode = 1999EnST...33.4292W }}</ref>
* 1964–65 – [[Arno Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson]] measure the temperature to be approximately 3&nbsp;K. [[Robert Dicke]], [[Philip James Edwin Peebles|James Peebles]], P. G. Roll, and [[David Todd Wilkinson|D. T. Wilkinson]] interpret this radiation as a signature of the Big Bang.
* 1964–65 – [[Arno Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson]] measure the temperature to be approximately 3&nbsp;K. [[Robert Dicke]], [[Philip James Edwin Peebles|James Peebles]], P. G. Roll, and [[David Todd Wilkinson|D. T. Wilkinson]] interpret this radiation as a signature of the Big Bang.
Line 306: Line 306:
* 2010 – The first all-sky map from the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]] is released.
* 2010 – The first all-sky map from the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]] is released.
* 2013 – An improved all-sky map from the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]] is released, improving the measurements of WMAP and extending them to much smaller scales.
* 2013 – An improved all-sky map from the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]] is released, improving the measurements of WMAP and extending them to much smaller scales.
* 2014 – On March 17, 2014, astrophysicists of the [[BICEP and Keck Array|BICEP2]] collaboration announced the detection of inflationary [[gravitational waves]] in the [[B-modes|B-mode]] [[power spectrum]], which if confirmed, would provide clear experimental evidence for the [[Inflation (cosmology)|theory of inflation]].<ref name="BICEP2-2014"/><ref name="NASA-20140317">{{cite web |last=Clavin |first=Whitney |title=NASA Technology Views Birth of the Universe |url=http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2014-082 |date=March 17, 2014 |website=[[NASA]] |access-date=March 17, 2014 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20140317">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |date=March 17, 2014 |title=Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/science/space/detection-of-waves-in-space-buttresses-landmark-theory-of-big-bang.html |url-access=registration |access-date=March 17, 2014}}</ref><ref name="NYT-20140324">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Ripples From the Big Bang |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/science/space/ripples-from-the-big-bang.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/science/space/ripples-from-the-big-bang.html |archive-date=2022-01-01 |url-access=limited |date=March 24, 2014 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=March 24, 2014 }}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="PRL-20140619">
* 2014 – On March 17, 2014, astrophysicists of the [[BICEP and Keck Array|BICEP2]] collaboration announced the detection of inflationary [[gravitational waves]] in the [[B-modes|B-mode]] [[power spectrum]], which if confirmed, would provide clear experimental evidence for the [[Inflation (cosmology)|theory of inflation]].<ref name="BICEP2-2014"/><ref name="NASA-20140317">{{cite web |last=Clavin |first=Whitney |title=NASA Technology Views Birth of the Universe |url=http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2014-082 |date=March 17, 2014 |website=[[NASA]] |access-date=March 17, 2014 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20140317">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |date=March 17, 2014 |title=Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/science/space/detection-of-waves-in-space-buttresses-landmark-theory-of-big-bang.html |url-access=registration |access-date=March 17, 2014}}</ref><ref name="NYT-20140324">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Ripples From the Big Bang |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/science/space/ripples-from-the-big-bang.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/science/space/ripples-from-the-big-bang.html |archive-date=2022-01-01 |url-access=limited |date=March 24, 2014 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=March 24, 2014 }}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="PRL-20140619">{{cite journal | last1=Ade | first1=P. A. R. | last2=Aikin | first2=R. W. | last3=Barkats | first3=D. | last4=Benton | first4=S. J. | last5=Bischoff | first5=C. A. | last6=Bock | first6=J. J. | last7=Brevik | first7=J. A. | last8=Buder | first8=I. | last9=Bullock | first9=E. | last10=Dowell | first10=C. D. | last11=Duband | first11=L. | last12=Filippini | first12=J. P. | last13=Fliescher | first13=S. | last14=Golwala | first14=S. R. | last15=Halpern | first15=M. | last16=Hasselfield | first16=M. | last17=Hildebrandt | first17=S. R. | last18=Hilton | first18=G. C. | last19=Hristov | first19=V. V. | last20=Irwin | first20=K. D. | last21=Karkare | first21=K. S. | last22=Kaufman | first22=J. P. | last23=Keating | first23=B. G. | last24=Kernasovskiy | first24=S. A. | last25=Kovac | first25=J. M. | last26=Kuo | first26=C. L. | last27=Leitch | first27=E. M. | last28=Lueker | first28=M. | last29=Mason | first29=P. | last30=Netterfield | first30=C. B. | last31=Nguyen | first31=H. T. | last32=O’Brient | first32=R. | last33=Ogburn | first33=R. W. | last34=Orlando | first34=A. | last35=Pryke | first35=C. | last36=Reintsema | first36=C. D. | last37=Richter | first37=S. | last38=Schwarz | first38=R. | last39=Sheehy | first39=C. D. | last40=Staniszewski | first40=Z. K. | last41=Sudiwala | first41=R. V. | last42=Teply | first42=G. P. | last43=Tolan | first43=J. E. | last44=Turner | first44=A. D. | last45=Vieregg | first45=A. G. | last46=Wong | first46=C. L. | last47=Yoon | first47=K. W. | others=(BICEP2 Collaboration) | title=Detection of B -Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2 | journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] | volume=112 | issue=24 | date=2014-06-19 | issn=0031-9007 | access-date=2026-04-26 |article-number=241101| doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 | url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 |pmid=24996078|arxiv = 1403.3985 |bibcode = 2014PhRvL.112x1101B |s2cid=22780831 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=6865 | title=BICEP2 News {{pipe}} Not Even Wrong| date=13 May 2014}}</ref> However, on 19 June 2014, lowered confidence in confirming the [[cosmic inflation]] findings was reported.<ref name="PRL-20140619" /><ref name="NYT-20140619">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html |archive-date=2022-01-01 |url-access=limited |date=June 19, 2014 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=June 20, 2014 }}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="BBC-20140619">{{cite news |last=Amos |first=Jonathan |title=Cosmic inflation: Confidence lowered for Big Bang signal |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27935479 |date=June 19, 2014 |work=[[BBC News]] |access-date=June 20, 2014 }}</ref>
{{cite journal |author=Ade, P.A.R. (BICEP2 Collaboration) |title=Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2 |year=2014 |journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |volume=112 |issue=24 |page=241101 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 |pmid=24996078|arxiv = 1403.3985 |bibcode = 2014PhRvL.112x1101B |s2cid=22780831 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=6865 | title=BICEP2 News {{pipe}} Not Even Wrong}}</ref> However, on 19 June 2014, lowered confidence in confirming the [[cosmic inflation]] findings was reported.<ref name="PRL-20140619" /><ref name="NYT-20140619">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html |archive-date=2022-01-01 |url-access=limited |date=June 19, 2014 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=June 20, 2014 }}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="BBC-20140619">{{cite news |last=Amos |first=Jonathan |title=Cosmic inflation: Confidence lowered for Big Bang signal |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27935479 |date=June 19, 2014 |work=[[BBC News]] |access-date=June 20, 2014 }}</ref>
* 2015 – On January 30, 2015, the same team of astronomers from BICEP2 withdrew the claim made on the previous year. Based on the combined data of BICEP2 and Planck, the [[European Space Agency]] announced that the signal can be entirely attributed to [[Cosmic dust|dust]] in the Milky Way.<ref name="nature-20150130">{{cite journal|title=Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead|last=Cowen|first=Ron|date=2015-01-30|journal=Nature|doi=10.1038/nature.2015.16830|s2cid=124938210}}<!--|access-date=2015-10-26--></ref>
* 2015 – On January 30, 2015, the same team of astronomers from BICEP2 withdrew the claim made on the previous year. Based on the combined data of BICEP2 and Planck, the [[European Space Agency]] announced that the signal can be entirely attributed to [[Cosmic dust|dust]] in the Milky Way.<ref name="nature-20150130">{{cite journal|title=Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead|last=Cowen|first=Ron|date=2015-01-30|journal=Nature|doi=10.1038/nature.2015.16830|s2cid=124938210}}<!--|access-date=2015-10-26--></ref>
* 2018 – The final data and maps from the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]] is released, with improved measurements of the polarization on large scales.<ref>{{Cite journal |author1=Planck Collaboration |display-authors=etal |title=Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics |year=2020 |volume=641 |pages=A1 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 |arxiv=1807.06205 |bibcode = 2020A&A...641A...1P|s2cid=119185252 }}</ref>
* 2018 – The final data and maps from the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck telescope]] is released, with improved measurements of the polarization on large scales.<ref>{{Cite journal |author1=Planck Collaboration |display-authors=etal |title=Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics |year=2020 |volume=641 |pages=A1 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 |arxiv=1807.06205 |bibcode = 2020A&A...641A...1P|s2cid=119185252 }}</ref>
Line 314: Line 313:
==In popular culture==
==In popular culture==
* In the ''[[Stargate Universe]]'' TV series (2009–2011), an [[Ancient (Stargate)|ancient]] spaceship, ''Destiny'', was built to study patterns in the CMBR which is a sentient message left over from the beginning of time.<ref>{{cite AV media | date=November 10, 2010 | title=Stargate Universe - Robert Carlyle talks about background radiation and Destiny's mission | type=Video | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID6QSX9CAsI | access-date=2023-02-28 | publisher=YouTube }}</ref>
* In the ''[[Stargate Universe]]'' TV series (2009–2011), an [[Ancient (Stargate)|ancient]] spaceship, ''Destiny'', was built to study patterns in the CMBR which is a sentient message left over from the beginning of time.<ref>{{cite AV media | date=November 10, 2010 | title=Stargate Universe - Robert Carlyle talks about background radiation and Destiny's mission | type=Video | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID6QSX9CAsI | access-date=2023-02-28 | publisher=YouTube }}</ref>
* In ''[[Wheelers (novel)|Wheelers]]'', a novel (2000) by [[Ian Stewart (mathematician)|Ian Stewart]] & [[Jack Cohen (biologist)|Jack Cohen]], CMBR is explained as the encrypted transmissions of an ancient civilization. This allows the Jovian "blimps" to have a society older than the currently-observed age of the universe.<ref>{{cite book |title=Wheelers |url=https://archive.org/details/wheelers0000stew/page/494/mode/2up?q=%22age+of+the+universe%22}}</ref>
* In ''[[Wheelers (novel)|Wheelers]]'', a novel (2000) by [[Ian Stewart (mathematician)|Ian Stewart]] & [[Jack Cohen (biologist)|Jack Cohen]], CMBR is explained as the encrypted transmissions of an ancient civilization. This allows the Jovian "blimps" to have a society older than the currently-observed age of the universe.<ref>{{cite book | last1=Stewart | first1=Ian | last2=Cohen | first2=Jack |title=Wheelers | date=2001 | publisher=Warner Books | isbn=978-0-446-61008-7 |url=https://archive.org/details/wheelers0000stew/page/494/mode/2up?q=%22age+of+the+universe%22}}</ref>
* In ''[[The Three-Body Problem (novel)|The Three-Body Problem]]'', a 2008 novel by [[Liu Cixin]], a probe from an alien civilization compromises instruments monitoring the CMBR in order to deceive a character into believing the civilization has the power to manipulate the CMBR itself.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Liu |first=Cixin |date=2014-09-23 |title=The Three-Body Problem: "The Universe Flickers" |url=https://www.tor.com/2014/09/23/the-three-body-problem-the-universe-flickers/ |access-date=2023-01-23 |website=Tor.com |language=en-US}}</ref>
* In ''[[The Three-Body Problem (novel)|The Three-Body Problem]]'', a 2008 novel by [[Liu Cixin]], a probe from an alien civilization compromises instruments monitoring the CMBR in order to deceive a character into believing the civilization has the power to manipulate the CMBR itself.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Liu |first=Cixin |date=2014-09-23 |title=The Three-Body Problem: "The Universe Flickers" |url=https://www.tor.com/2014/09/23/the-three-body-problem-the-universe-flickers/ |access-date=2023-01-23 |website=Tor.com |language=en-US}}</ref>
* The 2017 issue of the [[Banknotes of the Swiss franc#Ninth series|Swiss 20 francs bill]] lists several astronomical objects with their distances – the CMB is mentioned with 430 · 10<sup>15</sup> [[light-second]]s.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Astronomy in your wallet - NCCR PlanetS |url=https://nccr-planets.ch/blog/2017/12/07/astronomy-in-your-wallet/ |access-date=2023-01-23 |website=nccr-planets.ch |language=en-US}}</ref>
* The 2017 issue of the [[Banknotes of the Swiss franc#Ninth series|Swiss 20 francs bill]] lists several astronomical objects with their distances – the CMB is mentioned with 430 · 10<sup>15</sup> [[light-second]]s.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Astronomy in your wallet - NCCR PlanetS |url=https://nccr-planets.ch/blog/2017/12/07/astronomy-in-your-wallet/ |access-date=2023-01-23 |website=nccr-planets.ch |language=en-US}}</ref>
Line 342: Line 341:
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|30em|refs=
{{Reflist|30em|refs=
<ref name="Apeiron2_3_79">{{Cite journal| last1     = Assis
<ref name="Apeiron2_3_79">{{Cite journal
  | first1   = A. K. T.
|last1       = Assis
  | last2     = Paulo
  |first1       = A. K. T.
  | first2   = São
  |last2       = Paulo
  | last3     = Neves
  |first2       = São
  | first3   = M. C. D.
  |last3       = Neves
  | title     = History of the 2.7&nbsp;K Temperature Prior to Penzias and Wilson
  |first3       = M. C. D.
  | journal   = Apeiron
  |title       = History of the 2.7&nbsp;K Temperature Prior to Penzias and Wilson
  | volume   = 2
  |journal     = Apeiron
  | issue     = 3
  |volume       = 2
  | pages     = 79–87
  |issue       = 3
  |date=July 1995
  |pages       = 79–87
  | url       = http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V02NO3PDF/V02N3ASS.PDF
  |date         = July 1995
  |url         = http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V02NO3PDF/V02N3ASS.PDF
|archive-date = 2024-03-24
|access-date  = 2014-04-01
|archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20240324190849/http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V02NO3PDF/V02N3ASS.PDF
  }}</ref>
  }}</ref>


<ref name="BICEP2-2014">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=BICEP2 2014 Results Release |url=http://bicepkeck.org |date=17 March 2014 |website=[[National Science Foundation]] |access-date=18 March 2014 }}</ref>
<ref name="BICEP2-2014">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=BICEP2 2014 Results Release |url=http://bicepkeck.org |date=17 March 2014 |website=[[National Science Foundation]] |access-date=18 March 2014 }}</ref>


<ref name=cs>{{cite news |title=POLARBEAR project offers clues about origin of universe's cosmic growth spurt |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/1021/POLARBEAR-project-offers-clues-about-origin-of-universe-s-cosmic-growth-spurt |newspaper=Christian Science Monitor | date=October 21, 2014}}</ref>
<ref name=cs>{{cite news |title=POLARBEAR project offers clues about origin of universe's cosmic growth spurt |url=https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/1021/POLARBEAR-project-offers-clues-about-origin-of-universe-s-cosmic-growth-spurt |newspaper=Christian Science Monitor | date=October 21, 2014}}</ref>


<ref name=pc1>{{Cite journal|title = A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR |author = The Polarbear Collaboration|year = 2014|journal = [[The Astrophysical Journal]]|doi = 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/171|bibcode=2014ApJ...794..171P |volume=794 |issue = 2 |pages=171|arxiv = 1403.2369 |s2cid = 118598825}}</ref>
<ref name=pc1>{{Cite journal|title = A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR |author = The Polarbear Collaboration|year = 2014|journal = [[The Astrophysical Journal]]|doi = 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/171|bibcode=2014ApJ...794..171P |volume=794 |issue = 2 |page=171|arxiv = 1403.2369 |s2cid = 118598825}}</ref>


<ref name="NYT-20140922">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Study Confirms Criticism of Big Bang Finding |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/23/science/space/study-confirms-criticism-of-big-bang-finding.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/23/science/space/study-confirms-criticism-of-big-bang-finding.html |archive-date=2022-01-01 |url-access=limited |date=22 September 2014 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=22 September 2014 }}{{cbignore}}</ref>
<ref name="NYT-20140922">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Study Confirms Criticism of Big Bang Finding |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/23/science/space/study-confirms-criticism-of-big-bang-finding.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/23/science/space/study-confirms-criticism-of-big-bang-finding.html |archive-date=2022-01-01 |url-access=limited |date=22 September 2014 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=22 September 2014 }}{{cbignore}}</ref>
Line 368: Line 371:


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* {{cite book|last1=Balbi|first1=Amedeo|title=The music of the big bang : the cosmic microwave background and the new cosmology|date=2008|publisher=Springer|location=Berlin|isbn=978-3-540-78726-6}}
* {{cite book|last1=Balbi|first1=Amedeo|title=The Music of the Big Bang: The Cosmic Microwave Background and the New Cosmology|date=2008|publisher=Springer|location=Berlin|isbn=978-3-540-78726-6}}
* {{cite book|last=Durrer |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Durrer |title=The Cosmic Microwave Background |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-521-84704-9}}
* {{cite book|last=Durrer |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Durrer |title=The Cosmic Microwave Background |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-521-84704-9}}
* {{cite book|last1=Evans|first1=Rhodri|title=The Cosmic Microwave Background: How It Changed Our Understanding of the Universe|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-319-09927-9|date=2015 |language=en}}
* {{cite book|last1=Evans|first1=Rhodri|title=The Cosmic Microwave Background: How It Changed Our Understanding of the Universe|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-319-09927-9|date=2015 |language=en}}
Line 381: Line 384:
* {{cite web|author=Copeland, Ed|title=CMBR: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation|url=http://www.sixtysymbols.com/videos/CMBR.htm|website=Sixty Symbols|publisher=[[Brady Haran]] for the [[University of Nottingham]]}}
* {{cite web|author=Copeland, Ed|title=CMBR: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation|url=http://www.sixtysymbols.com/videos/CMBR.htm|website=Sixty Symbols|publisher=[[Brady Haran]] for the [[University of Nottingham]]}}


{{Portal bar|Physics|Astronomy|Stars|Outer space}}
{{CMB}}
{{CMB}}
{{Radio-astronomy}}
{{Radio-astronomy}}
{{Cosmology topics}}
{{Cosmology topics}}
{{Relativity}}
{{Relativity}}
{{Portal bar|Physics|Astronomy|Stars|Outer space}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


Line 392: Line 395:
[[Category:Cosmic background radiation]]
[[Category:Cosmic background radiation]]
[[Category:Gravitational lensing|*B-modes]]
[[Category:Gravitational lensing|*B-modes]]
[[Category:Inflation (cosmology)]]
[[Category:Cosmic inflation]]
[[Category:Observational astronomy]]
[[Category:Observational astronomy]]
[[Category:Physical cosmological concepts]]
[[Category:Physical cosmological concepts]]
[[Category:Radio astronomy]]
[[Category:Radio astronomy]]