Emperor: Difference between revisions
imported>AndrewPeterT →top: combine hatnotes |
imported>Aadirulez8 m v2.05 - Fix errors for CW project (Heading should end with "=") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Type of monarch}} | {{Short description|Type of monarch}} | ||
{{Redirect|Empress|other uses|Empress (disambiguation)|and|Emperor (disambiguation)}} | {{Redirect|Empress|other uses|Empress (disambiguation)|and|Emperor (disambiguation)}} | ||
{{ | {{lead too long|date=February 2026}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}} | ||
[[File:Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako 20190515.jpg|thumb|[[Emperor Naruhito]] and [[Empress Masako]] of Japan. The | {{Use British English|date=February 2026}} | ||
[[File:Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako 20190515.jpg|thumb|[[Emperor Naruhito]] and [[Empress Masako]] of Japan. The Emperor of Japan is the only [[List of current monarchs of sovereign states|current monarch]] in the world left carrying this title.]] | |||
{{Ranks of Nobility}} | {{Ranks of Nobility}} | ||
{{politics}} | {{politics}} | ||
[[File:Statue-Augustus.jpg|thumb|[[Augustus]], the first [[Roman emperor|emperor]] of the [[Roman Empire]], reigning from 27 BC until his death in AD 14.]] | [[File:Statue-Augustus.jpg|thumb|[[Augustus]], the first [[Roman emperor|emperor]] of the [[Roman Empire]], reigning from 27 BC until his death in AD 14.]] | ||
An '''emperor''' (from {{langx|la|[[imperator]]}}, via {{langx|fro|empereor}})<ref>{{OEtymD|emperor|access-date=2010-08-30}}</ref> is the (male) ruler of an [[empire]]. '''Empress''', the female equivalent, may indicate an emperor's wife ([[empress consort]]), mother/grandmother ([[empress dowager]]/[[grand empress dowager]]), or a woman who rules in her own right and name ([[empress regnant]] or ''[[suo jure]]''). Emperors are generally recognised to be of the highest monarchic [[honour]] and [[royal and noble ranks|rank]], surpassing [[king]]s. In [[Europe]], the title of Emperor has been used since the [[Middle Ages]], considered in those times equal or almost equal in dignity to that of [[Pope]] due to the latter's position as visible head of the Church and spiritual leader of the Catholic part of [[Western Europe]]. The [[emperor of Japan]] is the only currently [[List of current sovereign monarchs|reigning monarch]] whose title is translated into English as "Emperor". | |||
Both emperors and kings are [[monarch]]s or sovereigns, both emperor and empress are considered monarchical titles. In as much as there is a strict definition of emperor, it is that an emperor has no relations implying the superiority of any other ruler and typically rules over more than one nation. Therefore, a king might be obliged to pay [[tribute]] to another ruler,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/south-east-se-asia/china-art/a/forbidden-city|title=The Forbidden City|last=Peng|first=Ying-chen|website=Khan Academy}}</ref> or be restrained in his actions in some unequal fashion, but an emperor should in theory be completely free of such restraints. However, monarchs heading empires have not always used the title in all contexts—the [[Queen Victoria|British sovereign]] did not assume the title Empress of the [[British Empire]] even during the [[British Raj|incorporation of India]], though she was declared [[Empress of India]]. | Both emperors and kings are [[monarch]]s or sovereigns, both emperor and empress are considered monarchical titles. In as much as there is a strict definition of emperor, it is that an emperor has no relations implying the superiority of any other ruler and typically rules over more than one nation. Therefore, a king might be obliged to pay [[tribute]] to another ruler,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/south-east-se-asia/china-art/a/forbidden-city|title=The Forbidden City|last=Peng|first=Ying-chen|website=Khan Academy}}</ref> or be restrained in his actions in some unequal fashion, but an emperor should in theory be completely free of such restraints. However, monarchs heading empires have not always used the title in all contexts—the [[Queen Victoria|British sovereign]] did not assume the title Empress of the [[British Empire]] even during the [[British Raj|incorporation of India]], though she was declared [[Empress of India]]. | ||
In [[Western Europe]], the title of Emperor was used exclusively by the [[Holy Roman Emperor]], whose imperial authority was derived from the concept of {{lang|la|[[translatio imperii]]}}, i.e., they claimed succession to the authority of the [[Roman emperors]], thus linking themselves to Roman institutions and traditions as part of state ideology. Although initially ruling much of Central Europe and northern Italy, by the 19th century, the emperor exercised little power beyond the German-speaking states. | In [[Western Europe]], the title of Emperor was used exclusively by the [[Holy Roman Emperor]], whose imperial authority was derived from the concept of {{lang|la|[[translatio imperii]]}}, i.e., they claimed succession to the authority of the [[Roman emperors]], thus linking themselves to Roman institutions and traditions as part of state ideology. Although initially ruling much of [[Central Europe]] and northern Italy, by the 19th century, the emperor exercised little power beyond the German-speaking states. | ||
Although technically an elective title, by the late 16th century, the imperial title had in practice come to be inherited by the [[Habsburg]] [[Archdukes of Austria]] and, following the [[Thirty Years' War]], their control over the states (outside the [[Habsburg monarchy]], i.e. [[Archduchy of Austria|Austria]], [[Kingdom of Bohemia|Bohemia]] and various territories outside the empire) had become nearly non-existent. However, [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] was crowned [[Emperor of the French]] in 1804 and was shortly followed by [[Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor]], who declared himself [[Emperor of Austria]] in the same year. The position of Holy Roman Emperor nonetheless continued until Francis II abdicated that position in 1806. In [[Eastern Europe]], the monarchs of [[Russia]] also used {{lang|la|translatio imperii}} to wield imperial authority as successors to the [[Eastern Roman Empire]]. Their status was officially | Although technically an elective title, by the late 16th century, the imperial title had in practice come to be inherited by the [[Habsburg]] [[Archdukes of Austria]] and, following the [[Thirty Years' War]], their control over the states (outside the [[Habsburg monarchy]], i.e. [[Archduchy of Austria|Austria]], [[Kingdom of Bohemia|Bohemia]] and various territories outside the empire) had become nearly non-existent. However, [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] was crowned [[Emperor of the French]] in 1804 and was shortly followed by [[Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor]], who declared himself [[Emperor of Austria]] in the same year. The position of Holy Roman Emperor nonetheless continued until Francis II abdicated that position in 1806. In [[Eastern Europe]], the monarchs of [[Russia]] also used {{lang|la|translatio imperii}} to wield imperial authority as successors to the [[Eastern Roman Empire]]. Their status was officially recognised by the Holy Roman Emperor in 1514, although not officially used by the [[List of Russian monarchs|Russian monarchs]] until 1547. However, the Russian emperors are better known by their [[Russian language|Russian-language]] title of [[Tsar]] even after [[Peter the Great]] adopted the title of [[Emperor of All Russia]] in 1721. | ||
Historians have liberally used "emperor" and "empire" anachronistically and out of its Roman and European context to describe any large state from the past or the present. Some titles are considered equivalent to "emperor" or are translated as "emperor". Examples of that are | Historians have liberally used "emperor" and "empire" anachronistically and out of its Roman and European context to describe any large state from the past or the present. Some titles are considered equivalent to "emperor" or are translated as "emperor". Examples of that are Roman emperors' titles, [[King of Kings]], [[Khalifa]], [[Emperor of China|Huangdi]], [[Cakravartin]], [[Great Khan]], Aztec monarchs' title, Inca monarchs' title, etc.<ref name="malinowski1619">{{Cite book |author-last=Malinowski |author-first=Gościwit |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110731590-002/html?lang=en |title=Empire and Politics in the Eastern and Western Civilisations |chapter=''Imperator-Huangdi'': The Idea of the Highest Universal Divine Ruler in the West and China |pages=16–19|editor-last1=Balbo |editor-first1=Andrea |editor-last2=Ahn |editor-first2=Jaewon |editor-last3=Kim |editor-first3=Kihoon |year=2022 |publisher=De Gruyter |doi=10.1515/9783110731590-002 |isbn=978-3-11-073159-0 }}</ref> Sometimes this reference has even extended to non-monarchically ruled states and their spheres of influence, such as the [[Athenian Empire]] of the late 5th century BC, the [[Angevin Empire]] of the [[Plantagenets]] and the [[Soviet Empire|Soviet]] and [[American imperialism|US]] "empires" of the [[Cold War]] era. However, such "empires" did not need to be headed by an "emperor". "Empire" became identified instead with vast territorial holdings rather than the title of its ruler by the mid-18th century. | ||
For purposes of protocol, the size and scope of a kingdom or empire may determine [[Order of precedence|precedence]] in international diplomatic relations, but currently, | For purposes of protocol, the size and scope of a kingdom or empire may determine [[Order of precedence|precedence]] in international diplomatic relations, but currently, precedence among [[heads of state]] who are sovereigns—whether they be kings, queens, emperors, empresses, princes, princesses and presidents may be determined by the size and scope or time that [[Seniority|each one has been continuously in office]]. Outside the European context, "emperor" was the translation given to holders of titles who were accorded the same precedence as European emperors in diplomatic terms. In reciprocity, these rulers might accredit equal titles in their native languages to their European peers. Through centuries of international convention, this has become the dominant rule to identifying an emperor in the modern era. | ||
==Roman Empire== | ==Roman Empire== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
{{Main|Roman emperor|Imperator}} | {{Main|Roman emperor|Imperator}} | ||
[[File:Rimini083.jpg|thumb|upright|A statue of [[Roman dictator|''dictator'']] [[Julius Caesar]]]] | [[File:Rimini083.jpg|thumb|upright|A statue of [[Roman dictator|''dictator'']] [[Julius Caesar]]]] | ||
When [[Roman Republic|Republican Rome]] turned into a ''de facto'' [[monarchy]] in the second half of the 1st century BC, at first there was no name for the title of the new type of monarch. Ancient Romans abhorred the name [[King of Rome|Rex ("king")]], and it was critical to the political order to maintain the forms and | When [[Roman Republic|Republican Rome]] turned into a ''de facto'' [[monarchy]] in the second half of the 1st century BC, at first there was no name for the title of the new type of monarch. Ancient Romans abhorred the name [[King of Rome|Rex ("king")]], and it was critical to the political order to maintain the forms and pretences of republican rule. [[Julius Caesar]] had been [[Roman dictator|Dictator]], an acknowledged and traditional office in Republican Rome. Caesar was not the [[Titus Larcius|first]] to hold it, but following his assassination the term was abhorred in Rome.{{Citation needed|date=September 2015}} | ||
[[Augustus]], considered the first [[Roman emperor]], established his hegemony by collecting on himself offices, titles, and honours of Republican Rome that had traditionally been distributed to different people, | [[Augustus]], considered the first [[Roman emperor]], established his hegemony by collecting on himself offices, titles, and honours of Republican Rome that had traditionally been distributed to different people who held these roles for a specific time period, often with a colleague. In the process, Augustus concentrated what had been distributed power in one man, all at once, and in practice without a time limit (the powers with nominal time limits were renewed when they lapsed). One of these offices was ''[[princeps senatus]]'', ("first man of the Senate") and became changed into Augustus' chief honorific, ''[[Princeps|princeps civitatis]]'' ("first citizen") from which the modern English word and title [[prince]] is descended as for the term [[premier]]. The first period of the [[Roman Empire]], from 27 BC to AD 284, is called the ''[[principate]]'' for this reason. However, it was the informal descriptive of ''[[Imperator]]'' ("commander") that became the title increasingly favoured by his successors. Previously bestowed on high officials and military commanders who had ''[[imperium]]'', Augustus reserved it exclusively to himself as the ultimate holder of all ''imperium''. (''Imperium'' is Latin for the authority to command, one of a various types of authority delineated in Roman political thought.) | ||
Beginning with Augustus, ''Imperator'' appeared in the title of all Roman monarchs through the extinction of the Empire in 1453. After the reign of Augustus' immediate successor [[Tiberius]], being proclaimed ''imperator'' was transformed into the act of accession to the [[head of state]]. Other honorifics used by the Roman emperors have also come to be synonyms for Emperor: | Beginning with Augustus, ''Imperator'' appeared in the title of all Roman monarchs through the extinction of the Empire in 1453. After the reign of Augustus' immediate successor [[Tiberius]], being proclaimed ''imperator'' was transformed into the act of accession to the [[head of state]]. Other honorifics used by the Roman emperors have also come to be synonyms for Emperor: | ||
| Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
====Before the 4th Crusade==== | ====Before the 4th Crusade==== | ||
[[File:Sanvitale03.jpg|thumb|Under [[Justinian I]], reigning in the 6th century, parts of Italy were for a few decades (re)conquered from the [[Ostrogoths]]: thus, this famous [[mosaic]], featuring the Byzantine emperor in the | [[File:Sanvitale03.jpg|thumb|Under [[Justinian I]], reigning in the 6th century, parts of Italy were for a few decades (re)conquered from the [[Ostrogoths]]: thus, this famous [[mosaic]], featuring the Byzantine emperor in the centre, can be admired at [[Ravenna]].]] | ||
Historians generally refer to the continuing Roman Empire in the east as the [[Byzantine Empire]] after [[Byzantium]], the original name of the town that [[Constantine I]] would elevate to the Imperial capital as [[New Rome]] in AD 330. (The city is more commonly called [[Constantinople]] and is today named [[Istanbul]]). Although the empire was again subdivided and a co-emperor sent to Italy at the end of the fourth century, the office became unitary again only 95 years later at the request of the [[Roman Senate]] and following the death of [[Julius Nepos]], last Western Emperor. This change was a recognition of the reality that little remained of Imperial authority in the areas that had been the Western Empire, with even Rome and Italy itself now ruled by the essentially autonomous [[Odoacer]]. | Historians generally refer to the continuing Roman Empire in the east as the [[Byzantine Empire]] after [[Byzantium]], the original name of the town that [[Constantine I]] would elevate to the Imperial capital as [[New Rome]] in AD 330. (The city is more commonly called [[Constantinople]] and is today named [[Istanbul]]). Although the empire was again subdivided and a co-emperor sent to Italy at the end of the fourth century, the office became unitary again only 95 years later at the request of the [[Roman Senate]] and following the death of [[Julius Nepos]], last Western Emperor. This change was a recognition of the reality that little remained of Imperial authority in the areas that had been the Western Empire, with even Rome and Italy itself now ruled by the essentially autonomous [[Odoacer]]. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
In general usage, the Byzantine imperial title evolved from simply "emperor" (''basileus'') to "emperor of the Romans" (''basileus tōn Rōmaiōn'') in the 9th century, to "emperor and autocrat of the Romans" (''basileus kai autokratōr tōn Rōmaiōn'') in the 10th.<ref>[[George Alexandrovič Ostrogorsky|George Ostrogorsky]], "Avtokrator i samodržac", ''Glas Srpske kraljevske akadamije'' CLXIV, Drugi razdred 84 (1935), 95–187.</ref> In fact, none of these (and other) additional epithets and titles had ever been completely discarded. | In general usage, the Byzantine imperial title evolved from simply "emperor" (''basileus'') to "emperor of the Romans" (''basileus tōn Rōmaiōn'') in the 9th century, to "emperor and autocrat of the Romans" (''basileus kai autokratōr tōn Rōmaiōn'') in the 10th.<ref>[[George Alexandrovič Ostrogorsky|George Ostrogorsky]], "Avtokrator i samodržac", ''Glas Srpske kraljevske akadamije'' CLXIV, Drugi razdred 84 (1935), 95–187.</ref> In fact, none of these (and other) additional epithets and titles had ever been completely discarded. | ||
One important distinction between the post Constantine I (reigned AD 306–337) emperors and their pagan predecessors was [[cesaropapism]], the assertion that the emperor (or other head of state) is also the head of the Church. Although this principle was held by all emperors after Constantine, it met with increasing resistance and ultimately rejection by bishops in the west after the effective end of Imperial power there. This concept became a key element of the meaning of "emperor" in the Byzantine and Orthodox | One important distinction between the post Constantine I (reigned AD 306–337) emperors and their pagan predecessors was [[cesaropapism]], the assertion that the emperor (or other head of state) is also the head of the Church. Although this principle was held by all emperors after Constantine, it met with increasing resistance and ultimately rejection by bishops in the west after the effective end of Imperial power there. This concept became a key element of the meaning of "emperor" in the Byzantine and Orthodox East, but went out of favour in the west with the rise of [[Roman Catholicism]]. | ||
The Byzantine Empire also produced three women who effectively governed the state: the Empress [[Irene (empress)|Irene]] and the Empresses [[Zoe Porphyrogenita|Zoe]] and [[Theodora (11th century)|Theodora]]. | The Byzantine Empire also produced three women who effectively governed the state: the Empress [[Irene (empress)|Irene]] and the Empresses [[Zoe Porphyrogenita|Zoe]] and [[Theodora (11th century)|Theodora]]. | ||
| Line 59: | Line 60: | ||
====Latin emperors==== | ====Latin emperors==== | ||
{{Main|Latin Emperor}} | {{Main|Latin Emperor}} | ||
In 1204 Constantinople fell to the [[Republic of Venice|Venetians]] and the [[Franks]] in the [[Fourth Crusade]]. Following the [[Siege of Constantinople|sacking]] of the city, the conquerors declared a new "Empire of Romania", known to historians as the [[Latin Empire of Constantinople]], installing [[Baldwin IX]], [[Count of Flanders]], as Emperor. However, Byzantine resistance to the new empire meant that it was in constant struggle to establish itself. Byzantine Emperor [[Michael VIII Palaiologos]] succeeded in recapturing Constantinople in 1261. The [[Principality of Achaea]], a vassal state the empire had created in [[Morea]] (Greece) intermittently continued to | In 1204 Constantinople fell to the [[Republic of Venice|Venetians]] and the [[Franks]] in the [[Fourth Crusade]]. Following the [[Siege of Constantinople|sacking]] of the city, the conquerors declared a new "Empire of Romania", known to historians as the [[Latin Empire of Constantinople]], installing [[Baldwin IX]], [[Count of Flanders]], as Emperor. However, Byzantine resistance to the new empire meant that it was in constant struggle to establish itself. Byzantine Emperor [[Michael VIII Palaiologos]] succeeded in recapturing Constantinople in 1261. The [[Principality of Achaea]], a vassal state the empire had created in [[Morea]] (Greece) intermittently continued to recognise the authority of the crusader emperors for another half century. Pretenders to the title continued among the European nobility until circa 1383. | ||
====After the 4th Crusade==== | ====After the 4th Crusade==== | ||
With Constantinople occupied, claimants to the imperial succession styled themselves as emperor in the chief | With Constantinople occupied, claimants to the imperial succession styled themselves as emperor in the chief centres of resistance: The [[Laskaris|Laskarid]] dynasty in the [[Empire of Nicaea]], the [[Komnenos|Komnenid]] dynasty in the [[Empire of Trebizond]] and the [[Doukas|Doukid]] dynasty in the [[Despotate of Epirus]]. In 1248, Epirus recognised the Nicaean emperors, who subsequently recaptured Constantinople in 1261. The Trapezuntine emperor formally submitted in Constantinople in 1281,<ref>Nicol, Donald MacGillivray, ''The Last Centuries of Byzantium'', second edition (Cambridge: University Press, 1993), p. 74.</ref> but frequently flouted convention by styling themselves emperor back in Trebizond thereafter. | ||
==Europe== | ==Europe== | ||
{{more citations needed section|date=July 2020}} | {{more citations needed section|date=July 2020}} | ||
[[Byzantine Empire|Byzantium]]'s close cultural and political interaction with its Balkan | [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantium]]'s close cultural and political interaction with its Balkan neighbours [[Bulgaria]] and [[Serbia]], and with Russia (Kievan Rus', then Muscovy) led to the adoption of Byzantine imperial traditions in all of these countries. | ||
===Holy Roman Empire=== | ===Holy Roman Empire=== | ||
{{Main|Holy Roman Emperor}} | {{Main|Holy Roman Emperor}} | ||
[[File:Portrait of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, seated (1500–1558), formerly attributed to Titian (Alte Pinakothek, Munich).jpg|thumb|upright|[[Portrait of Charles V (Titian, Munich)|Portrait of Charles V]], Holy Roman Emperor | [[File:Portrait of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, seated (1500–1558), formerly attributed to Titian (Alte Pinakothek, Munich).jpg|thumb|upright|[[Portrait of Charles V (Titian, Munich)|Portrait of Charles V]], Holy Roman Emperor from 1519 to 1556, after [[Titian]]]] | ||
The ''Emperor'' of the Romans' title was a reflection of the ''[[translatio imperii]]'' (''transfer of rule'') principle that regarded the Holy Roman emperors as the inheritors of the title of Emperor of the [[Western Roman Empire]], despite the continued existence of the [[Byzantine Empire|Roman Empire]] in the east, hence the [[problem of two emperors]]. | The ''Emperor'' of the Romans' title was a reflection of the ''[[translatio imperii]]'' (''transfer of rule'') principle that regarded the Holy Roman emperors as the inheritors of the title of Emperor of the [[Western Roman Empire]], despite the continued existence of the [[Byzantine Empire|Roman Empire]] in the east, hence the [[problem of two emperors]]. | ||
| Line 80: | Line 81: | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Austria}} | {{Main|Emperor of Austria}} | ||
[[File:Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Franz Joseph I of Austria]]]] | [[File:Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Franz Joseph I of Austria]]]] | ||
The first Austrian Emperor was the last Holy Roman Emperor, [[Francis I of Austria| | The first Austrian Emperor was the last Holy Roman Emperor, [[Francis I of Austria|Francis II]]. In the face of aggressions by [[Napoleon]], Francis feared for the future of the [[Holy Roman Empire]]. He wished to maintain his and his family's Imperial status in the event that the Holy Roman Empire should be dissolved, as it indeed was in 1806 when an Austrian-led army suffered a humiliating defeat at the [[Battle of Austerlitz]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=liamfoley63|date=2020-08-06|title=August 6, 1806. Dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire.|url=https://europeanroyalhistory.wordpress.com/2020/08/06/august-6-1806-dissolution-of-the-holy-roman-empire/|access-date=2020-11-27|website=European Royal History|language=en}}</ref> After which, the victorious Napoleon proceeded to dismantle the old ''Reich'' by severing a good portion from the empire and turning it into a separate [[Confederation of the Rhine]]. With the size of his imperial realm significantly reduced, Francis II, ''Holy Roman Emperor'' became Francis I, ''Emperor of Austria''. The new imperial title may have sounded less prestigious than the old one, but Francis' [[dynasty]] continued to rule from Austria and a Habsburg monarch was still an emperor (''Kaiser''), and not just merely a king (''König''), in name. According to the historian Friedrich Heer, the Austrian Habsburg emperor remained an "auctoritas" of a special kind. He was "the grandson of the Caesars", he remained the patron of the [[Catholic Church|Holy Church]].<ref>Friedrich Heer "Der Kampf um die österreichische Identität" (1981), p. 259.</ref> | ||
The title lasted just a little over one century until 1918, but it was never clear what territory constituted the "[[Austrian Empire|Empire of Austria]]". When Francis took the title in 1804, the Habsburg lands as a whole were dubbed the ''Kaisertum Österreich''. ''Kaisertum'' might literally be translated as "emperordom" (on analogy with "kingdom") or "emperor-ship"; the term denotes specifically "the territory ruled by an emperor", and is thus somewhat more general than [[Reich]], which in 1804 carried connotations of universal rule. Austria proper (as opposed to the complex of Habsburg lands as a whole) had been part of the [[Archduchy of Austria]] since the 15th century, and most of the other territories of the Empire had their own institutions and territorial history. There were some attempts at | The title lasted just a little over one century until 1918, but it was never clear what territory constituted the "[[Austrian Empire|Empire of Austria]]". When Francis took the title in 1804, the Habsburg lands as a whole were dubbed the ''Kaisertum Österreich''. ''Kaisertum'' might literally be translated as "emperordom" (on analogy with "kingdom") or "emperor-ship"; the term denotes specifically "the territory ruled by an emperor", and is thus somewhat more general than [[Reich]], which in 1804 carried connotations of universal rule. Austria proper (as opposed to the complex of Habsburg lands as a whole) had been part of the [[Archduchy of Austria]] since the 15th century, and most of the other territories of the Empire had their own institutions and territorial history. There were some attempts at centralisation, especially during the reign of [[Maria Theresa]] and her son [[Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor]]. These efforts were finalised in the early 19th century. When the [[Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen]] (Hungary) were given self-government in 1867, the non-Hungarian portions were called the Empire of Austria. They were officially known as the "Kingdoms and Lands Represented in the [[Imperial Council (Austria)|Imperial Council]] (''Reichsrat'')". The title of Emperor of Austria and the associated Empire were both abolished at the end [[World War I]] in 1918, when [[German Austria]] became a [[republic]] and the other kingdoms and lands represented in the Imperial Council established their independence or adhesion to other states. | ||
The ''Kaisers'' of the Austrian Empire (1804–1918) were [[Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor|Franz I]] (1804–1835), [[Ferdinand I of Austria|Ferdinand I]] (1835–1848), [[ | The ''Kaisers'' of the Austrian Empire (1804–1918) were [[Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor|Franz I]] (1804–1835), [[Ferdinand I of Austria|Ferdinand I]] (1835–1848), [[Franz Joseph I]] (1848–1916) and [[Charles I of Austria|Karl I]] (1916–1918). The current head of the House of Habsburg is [[Karl von Habsburg]].<ref>Lonnie Johnson "Central Europe: Enemies, Neighbors, Friends" (2011), p. 118.</ref><ref>Anatol Murad "Franz Joseph I of Austria and his Empire." (1968) p. 1.</ref> | ||
===Bulgaria=== | ===Bulgaria=== | ||
{{main|First Bulgarian Empire|Second Bulgarian Empire}} | {{main|First Bulgarian Empire|Second Bulgarian Empire}} | ||
[[File:Car Simeon Bulharsky - Alfons Mucha.jpg|thumb|[[Simeon I of Bulgaria]], the first holder of the Imperial title [[Tsar]]]] | |||
In 913, [[Simeon I of Bulgaria]] was crowned Emperor ([[Tsar]], originally more fully Tsesar, ''cěsar''') of his own people by the [[Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople|Patriarch of Constantinople]] and Imperial regent [[Nicholas Mystikos]] outside the Byzantine capital.<ref>Mladjov 2015: 171–177.</ref> In its final expanded form, under the [[Second Bulgarian Empire]] the title read "Emperor and Autocrat of all Bulgarians and Greeks" (Цар и самодържец на всички българи и гърци, ''Car i samodăržec na vsički bălgari i gărci'' in the modern vernacular).<ref>Charters of Ivan Alexander and Ivan Shishman, in Petkov 2008: 500, 506–507.</ref> The Roman component in the Bulgarian imperial title indicated both rule over Greek speakers and the derivation of the imperial tradition from the Romans, however this component was never recognised by the Byzantine court. | In 913, [[Simeon I of Bulgaria]] was crowned Emperor ([[Tsar]], originally more fully Tsesar, ''cěsar''') of his own people by the [[Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople|Patriarch of Constantinople]] and Imperial regent [[Nicholas Mystikos]] outside the Byzantine capital.<ref>Mladjov 2015: 171–177.</ref> In its final expanded form, under the [[Second Bulgarian Empire]] the title read "Emperor and Autocrat of all Bulgarians and Greeks" (Цар и самодържец на всички българи и гърци, ''Car i samodăržec na vsički bălgari i gărci'' in the modern vernacular).<ref>Charters of Ivan Alexander and Ivan Shishman, in Petkov 2008: 500, 506–507.</ref> The Roman component in the Bulgarian imperial title indicated both rule over Greek speakers and the derivation of the imperial tradition from the Romans, however this component was never recognised by the Byzantine court. | ||
Byzantine recognition of Simeon's imperial title was revoked by the succeeding Byzantine government. The decade 914–924 was spent in destructive warfare between Byzantium and Bulgaria over this and other matters of conflict. The Bulgarian monarch, who had further irritated his Byzantine counterpart by claiming the title "Emperor of the Romans" (''basileus tōn Rōmaiōn''), was eventually | Byzantine recognition of Simeon's imperial title was revoked by the succeeding Byzantine government. The decade 914–924 was spent in [[Byzantine–Bulgarian war of 913–927|destructive warfare]] between Byzantium and Bulgaria over this and other matters of conflict. The Bulgarian monarch, who had further irritated his Byzantine counterpart by claiming the title "Emperor of the Romans" (''basileus tōn Rōmaiōn''), was eventually recognised, as "Emperor of the Bulgarians" (''basileus tōn Boulgarōn'') by the Byzantine Emperor [[Romanus I|Romanos I Lakapenos]] in 924.<ref>Mladjov 2015: 177–178.</ref> Byzantine recognition of the imperial dignity of the Bulgarian monarch and the patriarchal dignity of the [[Patriarch of All Bulgaria|Bulgarian patriarch]] was again confirmed at the conclusion of permanent peace and a Bulgarian-Byzantine dynastic marriage in 927. In the meantime, the Bulgarian imperial title may have been also tacitly confirmed by the [[pope]], as claimed in later Bulgarian diplomatic correspondence.<ref>Mladjov 1999.</ref> The Bulgarian imperial title "tsar" was adopted by all Bulgarian monarchs up to the fall of Bulgaria under Ottoman rule. Despite the attempt of Pope [[Innocent III]] to limit the Bulgarian monarch to the title of King (''Rex''), [[Kaloyan of Bulgaria]] considered himself an Emperor (''Imperator'') and his successor [[Boril of Bulgaria]] was specifically accused of improperly using the imperial title by his neighbour, the [[Latin Emperor]] [[Henry of Flanders]].<ref>Prinzing 1973: 420–421.</ref> Nevertheless, the Bulgarian imperial title was recognised by its neighbours and trading partners, including Byzantium, Hungary, Serbia, Venice, Genoa, Dubrovnik. 14th-century Bulgarian literary compositions saw the Bulgarian capital ([[Veliko Tarnovo|Tarnovo]]) as a successor of Rome and [[Constantinople]].<ref>Kaimakamova 2006.</ref> | ||
After Bulgaria obtained full independence from the [[Ottoman Empire]] in 1908, its monarch, who was previously styled ''Knyaz'', [[Prince]], took the traditional title of ''Tsar'', this time translated as [[King]]. [[Simeon Saxe-Coburg-Gotha]] is the former Tsar Simeon II of Bulgaria.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://bnt.bg/news/bulgaria%E2%80%99s-former-king-and-pm-simeon-ii-celebrates-his-80th-birthday-149283news.html| title = Bulgaria's Former King and PM Simeon II Celebrates his 80th Birthday}}</ref> | After Bulgaria obtained full independence from the [[Ottoman Empire]] in 1908, its monarch, who was previously styled ''Knyaz'', [[Prince]], took the traditional title of ''Tsar'', this time translated as [[King]]. [[Simeon Saxe-Coburg-Gotha]] is the former Tsar Simeon II of Bulgaria.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://bnt.bg/news/bulgaria%E2%80%99s-former-king-and-pm-simeon-ii-celebrates-his-80th-birthday-149283news.html| title = Bulgaria's Former King and PM Simeon II Celebrates his 80th Birthday}}</ref> | ||
| Line 96: | Line 98: | ||
===France=== | ===France=== | ||
{{main|Emperor of the French}} | {{main|Emperor of the French}} | ||
The kings of the ''[[Ancien Régime]]'' and the [[July Monarchy]] used the title ''Empereur de France'' in diplomatic correspondence and treaties with the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] emperor from at least 1673 onwards. The Ottomans insisted on this elevated style while refusing to | The kings of the ''[[Ancien Régime]]'' and the [[July Monarchy]] used the title ''Empereur de France'' in diplomatic correspondence and treaties with the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] emperor from at least 1673 onwards. The Ottomans insisted on this elevated style while refusing to recognise the Holy Roman emperors or the Russian tsars because of their rival claims of the [[translatio imperii|Roman crown]]. In short, it was an indirect insult by the Ottomans to the HRE and the Russians. The French kings also used it for [[Morocco]] (1682) and [[Persia]] (1715). | ||
====First French Empire==== | ====First French Empire==== | ||
{{main|First French Empire}} | {{main|First French Empire}} | ||
[[File:Jacques-Louis David - The Coronation of Napoleon (1805-1807).jpg|thumb|One of the most famous Imperial coronation ceremonies was that of Napoleon, crowning himself Emperor in the presence of [[Pope Pius VII]] (who had blessed the [[regalia]]), at the [[Notre Dame de Paris|Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris]].<br>The painting by [[Jacques-Louis David|David]] commemorating the event is equally famous: the gothic cathedral restyled ''[[Empire (style)|style Empire]]'', supervised by the [[Letizia Ramolino|mother of the Emperor]] on the balcony (a fictional addition, while she had not been present at the ceremony), the pope positioned near the altar, Napoleon proceeds to crown his then wife, [[Joséphine de Beauharnais]] as Empress.]] | [[File:Jacques-Louis David - The Coronation of Napoleon (1805-1807).jpg|thumb|One of the most famous Imperial coronation ceremonies was that of Napoleon, crowning himself Emperor in the presence of [[Pope Pius VII]] (who had blessed the [[regalia]]), at the [[Notre Dame de Paris|Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris]].<br>The painting by [[Jacques-Louis David|David]] commemorating the event is equally famous: the gothic cathedral restyled ''[[Empire (style)|style Empire]]'', supervised by the [[Letizia Ramolino|mother of the Emperor]] on the balcony (a fictional addition, while she had not been present at the ceremony), the pope positioned near the altar, Napoleon proceeds to crown his then wife, [[Joséphine de Beauharnais]] as Empress.]] | ||
[[Napoleon|Napoleon Bonaparte]], who was already First Consul of the French Republic (''Premier Consul de la République française'') for life, declared himself | [[Napoleon|Napoleon Bonaparte]], who was already First Consul of the French Republic (''Premier Consul de la République française'') for life, declared himself [[Emperor of the French]] (''Empereur des Français'') on 18 May 1804, thus creating the [[First French Empire|French Empire]] (''Empire Français'').<ref>{{Cite web|title=Napoleon and War in 1804–05|url=http://www.fsmitha.com/h3/h34-np4b.html|access-date=2020-11-27|website=www.fsmitha.com}}</ref> | ||
Napoleon relinquished the title of Emperor of the French on 6 April and again on 11 April 1814. Napoleon's infant son, [[ | Napoleon relinquished the title of Emperor of the French on 6 April and again on 11 April 1814. Napoleon's infant son, [[Napoleon II]], was recognised by the Council of Peers, as Emperor from the moment of his father's abdication, and therefore reigned (as opposed to ruled) as Emperor for fifteen days, 22 June to 7 July 1815. | ||
====Elba==== | ====Elba==== | ||
Since 3 May 1814, the Sovereign Principality of [[Elba]] was created as a miniature non-hereditary monarchy under the exiled French Emperor Napoleon I. According to the [[Treaty of Fontainebleau (1814)]], Napoleon I was allowed to enjoy the imperial title for life. The islands were ''not'' restyled an empire. | Since 3 May 1814, the Sovereign Principality of [[Elba]] was created as a miniature non-hereditary monarchy under the exiled French Emperor Napoleon I. According to the [[Treaty of Fontainebleau (1814)]], Napoleon I was allowed to enjoy the imperial title for life. The islands were ''not'' restyled an empire. | ||
On 26 February 1815, Napoleon abandoned Elba for France, reviving the French Empire for a [[Hundred Days]]; the Allies declared an end to Napoleon's sovereignty over Elba on 25 March 1815, and on 31 March 1815 Elba was ceded to the restored [[Grand Duchy of Tuscany]] by the Congress of Vienna. After his final defeat, Napoleon was treated as a general by the British authorities during his second exile to Atlantic Isle of [[St. Helena]]. His title was a matter of dispute with the governor of St Helena, who insisted on addressing him as "General Bonaparte", despite the "historical reality that he had been an emperor" and therefore retained the title.<ref>''Napoleon'', Vincent Cronin, p419, HarperCollins, 1994.</ref><ref>''Napoleon'', Frank McLynn, p644, Pimlico 1998.</ref><ref>''Le Mémorial de Sainte Hélène'', Emmanuel De Las Cases, Tome III, page101, published by Jean De Bonnot, Libraire à l'enseigne du canon, 1969.</ref> | On 26 February 1815, Napoleon abandoned Elba for France, reviving the French Empire for a [[Hundred Days]]; the Allies declared an end to Napoleon's sovereignty over Elba on 25 March 1815, and on 31 March 1815 Elba was ceded to the restored [[Grand Duchy of Tuscany]] by the Congress of Vienna. After his final defeat, Napoleon was treated as a general by the British authorities during his second exile to Atlantic Isle of [[St. Helena]]. His title was a matter of dispute with the governor of St. Helena, who insisted on addressing him as "General Bonaparte", despite the "historical reality that he had been an emperor" and therefore retained the title.<ref>''Napoleon'', Vincent Cronin, p419, HarperCollins, 1994.</ref><ref>''Napoleon'', Frank McLynn, p644, Pimlico 1998.</ref><ref>''Le Mémorial de Sainte Hélène'', Emmanuel De Las Cases, Tome III, page101, published by Jean De Bonnot, Libraire à l'enseigne du canon, 1969.</ref> | ||
====Second French Empire==== | ====Second French Empire==== | ||
{{main|Second French Empire}} | {{main|Second French Empire}} | ||
Napoleon I's nephew, [[ | Napoleon I's nephew, [[Napoleon III]], resurrected the title of emperor on 2 December 1852, after establishing the [[Second French Empire]] in a presidential [[coup]], subsequently approved by a plebiscite.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Second French Empire (1852–1870)|url=https://about-history.com/the-second-french-empire-1852-1870/|access-date=2020-11-27|website=About History|language=en-US}}</ref> His reign was marked by large scale public works, the development of social policy, and the extension of France's influence throughout the world. During his reign, he also set about creating the [[Second Mexican Empire]] (headed by his choice of [[Maximilian I of Mexico]], a member of the [[House of Habsburg]]), to regain France's hold in the Americas and to achieve greatness for the 'Latin' race.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=S1O6HwzwQs4C&pg=PA88 |title=Race and nation in modern Latin America |first1=Nancy P. |last1=Appelbaum |first2=Anne S. |last2=Macpherson |first3=Karin Alejandra |last3=Rosemblatt |publisher=UNC Press Books |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-8078-5441-9 |page=88}}</ref> Napoleon III was deposed on 4 September 1870, after France's defeat in the [[Franco-Prussian War]]. The [[French Third Republic|Third Republic]] followed and after the death of his son [[Louis-Napoléon, Prince Imperial|Napoleon (IV)]], in 1879 during the Zulu War, the Bonapartist movement split, and the Third Republic was to last until 1940. | ||
The role of head of the House of Bonaparte is claimed by [[Jean-Christophe, Prince Napoléon|Jean-Christophe Napoléon]] and [[Charles, Prince Napoléon|Charles Napoléon]]. | The role of head of the House of Bonaparte is claimed by [[Jean-Christophe, Prince Napoléon|Jean-Christophe Napoléon]] and [[Charles, Prince Napoléon|Charles Napoléon]]. | ||
| Line 121: | Line 123: | ||
The origin of the title ''[[Imperator totius Hispaniae]]'' ([[Latin language|Latin]] for ''Emperor of All [[Hispania|Spain]]''{{NoteTag|Before the emergence of the modern country of Spain (beginning with the union of [[Crown of Castile|Castile]] and [[Aragon]] in 1492), the Latin word ''[[Hispania]]'', in any of the [[Iberian Romance languages]], either in singular or plural forms (in English: Spain or Spains), was used to refer to the whole of the Iberian Peninsula, and not exclusively, as in modern usage, to the country of Spain, thus excluding Portugal.}}) is murky. It was associated with the [[List of Leonese monarchs|Leonese monarchy]] perhaps as far back as [[Alfonso the Great]] (''r.'' 866–910). The last two kings of its [[Astur-Leonese dynasty]] were called emperors in a contemporary source.{{Citation needed|date=November 2020}} | The origin of the title ''[[Imperator totius Hispaniae]]'' ([[Latin language|Latin]] for ''Emperor of All [[Hispania|Spain]]''{{NoteTag|Before the emergence of the modern country of Spain (beginning with the union of [[Crown of Castile|Castile]] and [[Aragon]] in 1492), the Latin word ''[[Hispania]]'', in any of the [[Iberian Romance languages]], either in singular or plural forms (in English: Spain or Spains), was used to refer to the whole of the Iberian Peninsula, and not exclusively, as in modern usage, to the country of Spain, thus excluding Portugal.}}) is murky. It was associated with the [[List of Leonese monarchs|Leonese monarchy]] perhaps as far back as [[Alfonso the Great]] (''r.'' 866–910). The last two kings of its [[Astur-Leonese dynasty]] were called emperors in a contemporary source.{{Citation needed|date=November 2020}} | ||
King [[Sancho III of Navarre]] conquered Leon in 1034 and began using it. His son, [[Ferdinand I of Castile]] also took the title in 1039. Ferdinand's son, [[Alfonso VI of León and Castile]] took the title in 1077. It then passed to his son-in-law, [[Alfonso I of Aragon]] in 1109. His stepson and Alfonso VI's grandson, [[Alfonso VII of Castile|Alfonso VII]] was the only one who actually had an imperial coronation in 1135. | King [[Sancho III of Navarre]] conquered Leon in 1034 and began using it. His son, [[Ferdinand I of Castile]], also took the title in 1039. Ferdinand's son, [[Alfonso VI of León and Castile]], took the title in 1077. It then passed to his son-in-law, [[Alfonso I of Aragon]], in 1109. His stepson and Alfonso VI's grandson, [[Alfonso VII of Castile|Alfonso VII]], was the only one who actually had an imperial coronation in 1135. | ||
The title was not exactly hereditary but self-proclaimed by those who had, wholly or partially, united the Christian northern part of the [[Iberian Peninsula]], often at the expense of killing rival siblings. The popes and Holy Roman emperors protested at the usage of the imperial title as a usurpation of leadership in western Christendom. After Alfonso VII's death in 1157 | The title was not exactly hereditary but self-proclaimed by those who had, wholly or partially, united the Christian northern part of the [[Iberian Peninsula]], often at the expense of killing rival siblings. The popes and Holy Roman emperors protested at the usage of the imperial title as a usurpation of leadership in western Christendom. After Alfonso VII's death in 1157 the title was abandoned, and the kings who used it are not commonly mentioned as having been "emperors", in Spanish or other historiography. | ||
After the fall of the Byzantine Empire | After the fall of the Byzantine Empire the legitimate heir to the throne, [[Andreas Palaiologos]], willed away his claim to [[Ferdinand and Isabella]] in 1503.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Nicol |first=Donald MacGillivray |url=https://archive.org/details/immortalemperorl0000nico/mode/2up |title=The immortal emperor : the life and legend of Constantine Palaiologos, last emperor of the Romans |date=1992 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-41456-2}}</ref> | ||
====Portugal==== | ====Portugal==== | ||
[[File:Jean-Baptiste Debret - Retrato de Dom João VI (MNBA).jpg|thumb|upright|[[John VI of Portugal|John VI]], [[List of Portuguese monarchs|King of Portugal and the Algarves]], [[Emperor of Brazil]]]] | [[File:Jean-Baptiste Debret - Retrato de Dom João VI (MNBA).jpg|thumb|upright|[[John VI of Portugal|John VI]], [[List of Portuguese monarchs|King of Portugal and the Algarves]], [[Emperor of Brazil]]]] | ||
After the independence and proclamation of the [[Empire of Brazil]] from the [[United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves | After the independence and proclamation of the [[Empire of Brazil]] from the [[United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves]] by [[Pedro I of Brazil|Prince Regent Pedro]], who became Emperor, in 1822 his father, King [[John VI of Portugal]], briefly held the honorific style of Titular [[Emperor of Brazil]] and the treatment of ''[[His Imperial and Royal Majesty]]'' under the 1825 [[Treaty of Rio de Janeiro (1825)|Treaty of Rio de Janeiro]], by which Portugal recognised the independence of Brazil. The style of Titular Emperor was a life title, and became extinct upon the holder's demise. John VI held the imperial title for a few months only, from the ratification of the Treaty in November 1825 until his death in March 1826. During those months, however, as John's imperial title was purely honorific while his son, Pedro I, remained the sole monarch of the Brazilian Empire. [[Duarte Pio, Duke of Braganza|Duarte Pio]] is the current head of the [[House of Braganza]]. | ||
===Great Britain=== | ===Great Britain=== | ||
| Line 138: | Line 140: | ||
There was no consistent title for the king of England before 1066, and monarchs chose to style themselves as they pleased. Imperial titles were used inconsistently, beginning with [[Athelstan]] in 930 and ended with the [[Norman conquest of England]]. [[Empress Matilda]] (1102–1167) is the only English monarch commonly referred to as "emperor" or "empress", but she acquired her title through her marriage to [[Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor]]. | There was no consistent title for the king of England before 1066, and monarchs chose to style themselves as they pleased. Imperial titles were used inconsistently, beginning with [[Athelstan]] in 930 and ended with the [[Norman conquest of England]]. [[Empress Matilda]] (1102–1167) is the only English monarch commonly referred to as "emperor" or "empress", but she acquired her title through her marriage to [[Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor]]. | ||
During the rule of [[ | During the rule of [[Henry VIII]] the [[Statute in Restraint of Appeals]] declared that 'this realm of England is an Empire...governed by one Supreme Head and King having the dignity and royal estate of the [[imperial Crown]] of the same'. This was in the context of the divorce of [[Catherine of Aragon]] and the [[English Reformation]], to emphasise that England had never accepted the quasi-imperial claims of the papacy. Hence England and, by extension its modern successor state, the [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]], is according to English law an Empire ruled by a King endowed with the imperial dignity. However, this has not led to the creation of the ''title'' of Emperor in England, nor in [[Kingdom of Great Britain|Great Britain]], nor in the United Kingdom. | ||
====United Kingdom==== | ====United Kingdom==== | ||
[[File:George V of the united Kingdom.jpg|thumb|upright|[[George V]], [[King of the United Kingdom]] and the [[British Dominions]], [[Emperor of India]]]] | [[File:George V of the united Kingdom.jpg|thumb|upright|[[George V]], [[King of the United Kingdom]] and the [[British Dominions]], [[Emperor of India]]]] | ||
In 1801, [[George | In 1801, [[George III]] rejected the title of Emperor when offered. The only period when British monarchs held the title of ''Emperor'' in a dynastic succession started when the title [[Emperor of India|Empress of India]] was created for [[Queen Victoria]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=liamfoley63|date=2019-11-12|title=History of Styles and Titles Part IV: Emperor of Britain.|url=https://europeanroyalhistory.wordpress.com/2019/11/12/history-of-styles-and-titles-part-iv-emperor-of-britain/|access-date=2020-11-27|website=European Royal History|language=en}}</ref> The government led by [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] [[Benjamin Disraeli]], conferred the additional title upon her by an Act of Parliament, reputedly to assuage the monarch's irritation at being, as a mere Queen, notionally inferior to the emperors of Russia, Germany, and Austria. That included her own daughter ([[Victoria, Princess Royal|Princess Victoria]], who was the wife of the [[Frederick III, German Emperor|reigning German Emperor]]). Hence, "Queen Victoria felt handicapped in the battle of protocol by not being an Empress herself".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Longford |first1=Elizabeth |title=Queen Victoria: Born to Succeed |date=1972 |isbn=9780515028683 |pages=404 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BGWCT8QaGD0C&q=handicapped+in+her+battles+over+protocol+by+not+being+an+Empress |access-date=18 August 2020}}</ref> The Indian Imperial designation was also formally justified as the expression of Britain succeeding the former [[Mughal Empire|Mughal Emperor]] as [[suzerain]] over hundreds of [[princely state]]s. The [[Indian Independence Act 1947]] provided for the abolition of the use of the title "[[Emperor of India]]" by the [[British monarch]], but this was not executed by King [[George VI]] until a [[royal proclamation]] on 22 June 1948. Despite this, George VI continued as king of India until 1950 and as king of Pakistan until his death in 1952. | ||
The last Empress of India was George VI's wife, [[Queen Elizabeth | The last Empress of India was George VI's wife, [[Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother]]. | ||
===German Empire=== | ===German Empire=== | ||
{{Main|German Emperor}} | {{Main|German Emperor}} | ||
[[File:Kohner - Kaiser Wilhelm II.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[ | [[File:Kohner - Kaiser Wilhelm II.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Wilhelm II]], [[German Emperor]] and [[King of Prussia]]]] | ||
Under the guise of idealism giving way to realism, German nationalism rapidly shifted from its liberal and democratic character in 1848 to [[Kingdom of Prussia|Prussian]] prime minister [[Otto von Bismarck]]'s authoritarian ''[[Realpolitik]]''. Bismarck wanted to unify the rival German states to achieve his aim of a conservative, Prussian-dominated Germany. Three wars led to military successes and helped to convince German people to do this: the [[Second war of Schleswig]] against Denmark in 1864, the [[Austro-Prussian War]] against [[Austrian Empire|Austria]] in 1866, and the [[Franco-Prussian War]] against the [[Second French Empire]] in 1870–71. During the [[Siege of Paris (1870-1871)|Siege of Paris]] in 1871, the [[North German Confederation]], supported by its allies from [[southern Germany]], formed the [[German Empire]] with the proclamation of the Prussian king [[ | Under the guise of idealism giving way to realism, German nationalism rapidly shifted from its liberal and democratic character in 1848 to [[Kingdom of Prussia|Prussian]] prime minister [[Otto von Bismarck]]'s authoritarian ''[[Realpolitik]]''. Bismarck wanted to unify the rival German states to achieve his aim of a conservative, Prussian-dominated Germany. Three wars led to military successes and helped to convince German people to do this: the [[Second war of Schleswig]] against Denmark in 1864, the [[Austro-Prussian War]] against [[Austrian Empire|Austria]] in 1866, and the [[Franco-Prussian War]] against the [[Second French Empire]] in 1870–71. During the [[Siege of Paris (1870-1871)|Siege of Paris]] in 1871, the [[North German Confederation]], supported by its allies from [[southern Germany]], formed the [[German Empire]] with the proclamation of the Prussian king [[Wilhelm I]] as German Emperor in the Hall of Mirrors at the [[Palace of Versailles]],<ref>{{Cite web|title=Treaty of Frankfurt am Main ends Franco-Prussian War|url=https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/treaty-of-frankfurt-am-main-ends-franco-prussian-war|access-date=2020-11-27|website=HISTORY|date=5 November 2009 |language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150401062332/https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/treaty-of-frankfurt-am-main-ends-franco-prussian-war|archive-date=2015-04-01}}</ref> to the humiliation of the French, who ceased to resist only days later. | ||
After his death he was succeeded by his son [[Frederick III, German Emperor|Frederick III]] who was only emperor for 99 days. In the same year his son [[ | After his death he was succeeded by his son [[Frederick III, German Emperor|Frederick III]] who was only emperor for 99 days. In the same year his son [[Wilhelm II]] became the third emperor within a year. He was the last German emperor. After the empire's defeat in World War I the empire, called the [[German Reich]], had a president as head of state instead of an emperor. The use of the word ''Reich'' was abandoned following [[World War II]]. | ||
===Russia=== | ===Russia=== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Russia}} | {{Main|Emperor of Russia}} | ||
[[File:Profile portrait of Catherine II by Fedor Rokotov (1763, Tretyakov gallery).jpg|thumb|upright|Empress [[Catherine the Great]] of Russia]] | [[File:Profile portrait of Catherine II by Fedor Rokotov (1763, Tretyakov gallery).jpg|thumb|upright|Empress [[Catherine the Great]] of Russia]] | ||
In 1472, the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, [[Sophia Paleologue|Sophia Palaiologina]], married [[Ivan III of Russia|Ivan III]], grand prince of Moscow, who began championing the idea of Russia being the successor to the Byzantine Empire. This idea was represented more emphatically in the composition the monk Filofej addressed to their son [[Vasili III of Russia|Vasili III]]. In 1480, after ending Muscovy's dependence on its overlords of the [[Great Horde]], Ivan III began the usage of the titles [[Tsar]] and Autocrat (''samoderzhets''). His insistence on recognition as such by the emperor of the [[Holy Roman Empire]] since 1489 resulted in the granting of this recognition in 1514 by Emperor [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximilian I]] to Vasili III. His son [[Ivan the Terrible|Ivan IV]] emphatically crowned himself [[Tsar of Russia]] on 16 January 1547. The word "Tsar" derives from Latin [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]], but this title was used in Russia as equivalent to "King"; the error occurred when medieval Russian clerics referred to the biblical Jewish kings with the same title that was used to designate Roman and Byzantine rulers — "Caesar". | In 1472, the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, [[Sophia Paleologue|Sophia Palaiologina]], married [[Ivan III of Russia|Ivan III]], grand prince of Moscow, who began championing the idea of Russia being the successor to the Byzantine Empire. This idea was represented more emphatically in the composition the monk Filofej addressed to their son [[Vasili III of Russia|Vasili III]]. In 1480, after ending Muscovy's dependence on its overlords of the [[Great Horde]], Ivan III began the usage of the titles [[Tsar]] and Autocrat (''samoderzhets''). His insistence on recognition as such by the emperor of the [[Holy Roman Empire]] since 1489 resulted in the granting of this recognition in 1514 by Emperor [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximilian I]] to Vasili III. His son [[Ivan the Terrible|Ivan IV]] emphatically crowned himself [[Tsar of Russia]] on 16 January 1547. The word "Tsar" derives from Latin [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]], but this title was used in Russia as equivalent to "King"; the error occurred when medieval Russian clerics referred to the biblical Jewish kings with the same title that was used to designate Roman and Byzantine rulers — "Caesar". | ||
On 31 October 1721, [[Peter the Great|Peter I]] was proclaimed Emperor by the [[Governing Senate]]. The title used was Latin "''Imperator''", which is a | On 31 October 1721, [[Peter the Great|Peter I]] was proclaimed Emperor by the [[Governing Senate]]. The title used was Latin "''Imperator''", which is a westernising form equivalent to the traditional Slavic title "''Tsar''". He based his claim partially upon a letter discovered in 1717 written in 1514 from Maximilian I to Vasili III, in which the Holy Roman Emperor used the term in referring to Vasili. | ||
A formal address to the ruling Russian monarch adopted thereafter was 'Your Imperial Majesty'. The [[Tsarevich|crown prince]] was addressed as 'Your Imperial Highness'. | A formal address to the ruling Russian monarch adopted thereafter was 'Your Imperial Majesty'. The [[Tsarevich|crown prince]] was addressed as 'Your Imperial Highness'. | ||
The title has not been used in Russia since the [[Abdication of Nicholas II|abdication]] of Emperor [[ | The title has not been used in Russia since the [[Abdication of Nicholas II|abdication]] of Emperor [[Nicholas II]] on 15 March 1917. | ||
The [[Russian Empire]] produced four reigning Empresses, all in the eighteenth century. These were [[Catherine I of Russia|Catherine I]], [[Anna of Russia|Anne]], [[Elizabeth of Russia|Elizabeth]], and [[Catherine the Great|Catherine II]]. | The [[Russian Empire]] produced four reigning Empresses, all in the eighteenth century. These were [[Catherine I of Russia|Catherine I]], [[Anna of Russia|Anne]], [[Elizabeth of Russia|Elizabeth]], and [[Catherine the Great|Catherine II]]. | ||
The role of head of the [[House of Romanov]] is claimed by [[Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna of Russia]] ( | The role of head of the [[House of Romanov]] is claimed by [[Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna of Russia|Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna]] (great-great-granddaughter of [[Alexander II of Russia|Alexander II]]), [[Prince Andrew Romanoff]] (great-great-grandson of [[Nicholas I of Russia|Nicholas I]]), and [[Prince Karl Emich of Leiningen]] (great-grandson of [[Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich of Russia|Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich]]). | ||
===Serbia=== | ===Serbia=== | ||
{{main|Serbian Empire|Emperor of Serbs}} | {{main|Serbian Empire|Emperor of Serbs}} | ||
[[File:Serbian Emperor Stefan Dušan.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|[[Emperor of Serbs|Emperor]] of [[Serbian Empire|Serbia]] [[Dušan the Mighty]]]] | [[File:Serbian Emperor Stefan Dušan.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|[[Emperor of Serbs|Emperor]] of [[Serbian Empire|Serbia]] [[Dušan the Mighty]]]] | ||
In 1345, the Serbian King [[Stefan Dusan|Stefan Uroš IV Dušan]] proclaimed himself Emperor ([[Tsar]]) and was crowned as such at [[Skopje]] on [[Easter]] 1346 by the newly created [[Serbian Patriarch]], and by the Patriarch of Bulgaria and the autocephalous Archbishop of Ohrid. His imperial title was | In 1345, the Serbian King [[Stefan Dusan|Stefan Uroš IV Dušan]] proclaimed himself Emperor ([[Tsar]]) and was crowned as such at [[Skopje]] on [[Easter]] 1346 by the newly created [[Serbian Patriarch]], and by the [[Patriarch of All Bulgaria|Patriarch of Bulgaria]] and the autocephalous [[Archbishopric of Ohrid|Archbishop of Ohrid]]. His imperial title was recognised by the Bulgarian Empire and various other neighbours and trading partners but not by the Byzantine Empire. In its final standardised form, the Serbian imperial title read "Emperor of Serbs and Greeks" (цар Срба и Грка, ''car Srba i Grka'' in modern Serbian). It was only employed by two monarchs in Serbia, Stefan Uroš IV Dušan and his son Stefan Uroš V, becoming extinct after the latter's death in 1371. A half-brother of Dušan, [[Simeon Uroš]], and then his son [[Jovan Uroš]], claimed the same title, until the latter's abdication in 1373, while ruling as dynasts in [[Thessaly]]. The "Greek" component in the Serbian imperial title indicates both rule over Greek speakers and the derivation of the imperial tradition from the Romans.<ref>Fine 1987: 309–310.</ref> A renegade Hungarian-Serb commander, [[Jovan Nenad]], who claimed to be a descendant of Serbian and Byzantine rulers, styled himself Emperor. | ||
==The Americas== | ==The Americas== | ||
| Line 180: | Line 183: | ||
====Aztec Empire==== | ====Aztec Empire==== | ||
{{Main|:es:Huey Tlatoani}} | {{Main|:es:Huey Tlatoani}} | ||
The only [[pre-Columbian]] North American rulers to be commonly called emperors were the ''Huey Tlatoani'' of the Mexica city-states of [[Tenochtitlan]], [[Tlacopan]] and [[Texcoco (altepetl)|Texcoco]], which along with their allies and tributaries are popularly known as the [[Aztec Empire]] (1375–1521). ''Tlatoani'' is a generic Nahuatl word for "speaker"; however, most English translators use "king" for their translation, thus rendering ''huey tlatoani'' as ''great king'' or ''emperor.''<ref>Lockhart (2001, p.238); Schroeder (2007, p. 3). See also the entry for [http://sites.estvideo.net/malinal/tl/nahuatlTLAHTLI.html#TLAHTOANI "TLAHTOANI"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070614183207/http://sites.estvideo.net/malinal/tl/nahuatlTLAHTLI.html#TLAHTOANI|date=2007-06-14}}, in Wimmer (2006).</ref> | The only [[pre-Columbian]] North American rulers to be commonly called emperors were the ''Huey Tlatoani'' of the Mexica city-states of [[Tenochtitlan]], [[Tlacopan]] and [[Texcoco (altepetl)|Texcoco]], which along with their allies and tributaries are popularly known as the [[Aztec Empire]] (1375–1521). ''Tlatoani'' is a generic Nahuatl word for "speaker"; however, most English translators use "king" for their translation, thus rendering ''huey tlatoani'' as ''great king'' or ''emperor.''<ref>Lockhart (2001, p.238); Schroeder (2007, p. 3). See also the entry for [http://sites.estvideo.net/malinal/tl/nahuatlTLAHTLI.html#TLAHTOANI "TLAHTOANI"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070614183207/http://sites.estvideo.net/malinal/tl/nahuatlTLAHTLI.html#TLAHTOANI|date=2007-06-14}}, in Wimmer (2006).</ref> | ||
| Line 186: | Line 190: | ||
====Inca Empire==== | ====Inca Empire==== | ||
{{Main|Sapa Inca}} | {{Main|Sapa Inca}} | ||
The only pre-Columbian South American rulers to be commonly called emperors were the ''[[Sapa Inca]]'' of the [[Inca Empire]] (1438–1533). Spanish conquistador [[Francisco Pizarro]], conquered the Inca for Spain, killed Emperor [[Atahualpa]], and installed puppets as well. Atahualpa may actually be considered a usurper as he had achieved power by [[Inca Civil War|killing his half-brother]] and he did not perform the required coronation with the imperial crown ''[[mascaipacha]]'' by the ''Huillaq Uma'' (high priest). | The only pre-Columbian South American rulers to be commonly called emperors were the ''[[Sapa Inca]]'' of the [[Inca Empire]] (1438–1533). Spanish conquistador [[Francisco Pizarro]], conquered the Inca for Spain, killed Emperor [[Atahualpa]], and installed puppets as well. Atahualpa may actually be considered a usurper as he had achieved power by [[Inca Civil War|killing his half-brother]] and he did not perform the required coronation with the imperial crown ''[[mascaipacha]]'' by the ''Huillaq Uma'' (high priest). | ||
| Line 191: | Line 196: | ||
====Brazil==== | ====Brazil==== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Brazil}} | {{Main|Emperor of Brazil}} | ||
[[File:Pedro Américo - D. Pedro II na abertura da Assembléia Geral.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Pedro II of Brazil|Pedro II]], [[List of monarchs of Brazil|Emperor of Brazil]] | |||
[[File:Pedro Américo - D. Pedro II na abertura da Assembléia Geral.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Pedro II of Brazil|Pedro II]], [[List of monarchs of Brazil|Emperor of Brazil]] wearing the [[Imperial Regalia of Brazil|Imperial Regalia]] at the opening of the General Assembly. Portrait by [[Pedro Américo]], 1872]] | |||
When [[Napoleon|Napoleon I]] ordered the invasion of Portugal in 1807 because it refused to join the [[Continental System]], the Portuguese [[House of Braganza|Braganzas]] moved their capital to [[Rio de Janeiro]] to avoid the fate of the [[Spanish Bourbons]] (Napoleon I arrested them and made his brother [[Joseph Bonaparte|Joseph]] king). When the French general [[Jean-Andoche Junot]] arrived in [[Lisbon]], the Portuguese fleet had already left with all the local elite. | When [[Napoleon|Napoleon I]] ordered the invasion of Portugal in 1807 because it refused to join the [[Continental System]], the Portuguese [[House of Braganza|Braganzas]] moved their capital to [[Rio de Janeiro]] to avoid the fate of the [[Spanish Bourbons]] (Napoleon I arrested them and made his brother [[Joseph Bonaparte|Joseph]] king). When the French general [[Jean-Andoche Junot]] arrived in [[Lisbon]], the Portuguese fleet had already left with all the local elite. | ||
In 1808, under a British naval escort, the fleet arrived in Brazil. Later, in 1815, the Portuguese Prince Regent ( | In 1808, under a British naval escort, the fleet arrived in Brazil. Later, in 1815, the Portuguese Prince Regent (later King as [[John VI of Portugal|João VI]]) proclaimed the [[United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves]], as a union of three kingdoms, lifting Brazil from its colonial status. | ||
After the fall of Napoleon | After the fall of Napoleon and the [[Liberal Revolution of 1820|Liberal Revolution]] in Portugal, the Portuguese royal family returned to Europe (1821). Prince Pedro of Braganza (King João's older son) stayed in South America acting as regent of the local kingdom, but, in 1822, he proclaimed himself [[Emperor of Brazil]] under the [[regnal name]] of [[Pedro I of Brazil|Pedro I]]. He did, however, recognise his father, João VI, as ''Titular Emperor of Brazil'' —a purely honorific title—until João VI's death in 1826. | ||
The empire came to an end in 1889, with the overthrow of [[Pedro II of Brazil|Emperor Pedro II]] (Pedro I's son and successor), when the [[First Brazilian Republic|Brazilian republic]] was [[Proclamation of the Republic (Brazil)|proclaimed]]. | The empire came to an end in 1889, with the overthrow of [[Pedro II of Brazil|Emperor Pedro II]] (Pedro I's son and successor), when the [[First Brazilian Republic|Brazilian republic]] was [[Proclamation of the Republic (Brazil)|proclaimed]]. | ||
Today the headship of the [[Brazilian imperial family|Imperial House of Brazil]] is disputed between two branches of the [[House of Orléans-Braganza]]. | Today the headship of the [[Brazilian imperial family|Imperial House of Brazil]] is disputed between two branches of the [[House of Orléans-Braganza]]: the Vassouras branch, headed by [[Bertrand of Orléans-Braganza]], and the Petrópolis branch, headed by Pedro Carlos of Orléans-Braganza. Both Bertrand and Pedro Carlos are great-great-grandsons of Emperor Pedro II. | ||
====Haiti==== | ====Haiti==== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Haiti}} | {{Main|Emperor of Haiti}} | ||
[[Haiti]] was declared an empire by its ruler, [[Jean-Jacques Dessalines]], who made himself Jacques I, on 20 May 1805. He was assassinated the next year.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Jean-Jacques Dessalines|url=https://www.biography.com/political-figure/jean-jacques-dessalines|access-date=2020-11-27|website=Biography|language=en-us}}</ref> Haiti again became an empire from 1849 to 1859 under [[Faustin Soulouque]]. | [[Haiti]] was declared an empire by its ruler, [[Jean-Jacques Dessalines]], who made himself Jacques I, on 20 May 1805. He was assassinated the next year.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Jean-Jacques Dessalines|url=https://www.biography.com/political-figure/jean-jacques-dessalines|access-date=2020-11-27|website=Biography|language=en-us}}</ref> Haiti again became an empire from 1849 to 1859 under [[Faustin Soulouque]]. | ||
====Mexico==== | ====Mexico==== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Mexico}} | {{Main|Emperor of Mexico}} | ||
[[File:Emperador Maximiliano I de Mexico.jpg|thumb|upright|Portrait of [[Maximilian I of Mexico]], by [[Franz Xaver Winterhalter]]]] | [[File:Emperador Maximiliano I de Mexico.jpg|thumb|upright|Portrait of [[Maximilian I of Mexico]], by [[Franz Xaver Winterhalter]]]] | ||
In Mexico, the [[First Mexican Empire]] was the first of two empires created. After the [[Declaration of Independence of the Mexican Empire|declaration of independence]] on 15 September 1821, it was the intention of the Mexican parliament to establish a commonwealth whereby the king of Spain, [[Fernando VII of Spain|Ferdinand VII]], would also be [[Emperor of Mexico]], but in which both countries were to be governed by separate laws and with their own legislative offices. Should the king refuse the position, the law provided for a member of the [[House of Bourbon]] to accede to the Mexican throne. | In Mexico, the [[First Mexican Empire]] was the first of two empires created. After the [[Declaration of Independence of the Mexican Empire|declaration of independence]] on 15 September 1821, it was the intention of the Mexican parliament to establish a commonwealth whereby the king of Spain, [[Fernando VII of Spain|Ferdinand VII]], would also be [[Emperor of Mexico]], but in which both countries were to be governed by separate laws and with their own legislative offices. Should the king refuse the position, the law provided for a member of the [[House of Bourbon]] to accede to the Mexican throne. | ||
Ferdinand VII, however, did not | Ferdinand VII, however, did not recognise the independence and said that Spain would not allow any other European prince to take the throne of Mexico. By request of Parliament, the president of the regency [[Agustín de Iturbide]] was proclaimed emperor of Mexico on 12 July 1822 as [[Agustín I]]. Agustín de Iturbide was the general who helped secure Mexican independence from Spanish rule, but was overthrown by the [[Plan of Casa Mata]]. | ||
In 1863, the invading French, under [[Napoleon III]] (see above), in alliance with Mexican conservatives and [[Mexican nobility|nobility]], helped create the [[Second Mexican Empire]], and invited Archduke Maximilian, of the [[House of Lorraine|House of Habsburg-Lorraine]], younger brother of the Austrian Emperor [[Franz Joseph I of Austria|Franz Josef I]], to become emperor [[Maximilian of Mexico|Maximilian I of Mexico]]. The childless Maximilian and his consort [[Charlotte of Belgium|Empress Carlota of Mexico]], daughter of [[Leopold I of Belgium]], adopted Agustín's grandsons Agustin and Salvador as his heirs to bolster his claim to the throne of Mexico. Maximilian and Carlota made [[Chapultepec Castle]] their home, which has been the only palace in North America to house sovereigns.{{Citation needed|date=November 2020}} After the withdrawal of French protection in 1867, Maximilian was captured and executed by the liberal forces of [[Benito Juárez]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-07-24|title=Mexican Historical Figures: Maximilian I|url=https://weexpats.com/mexican-historical-figures-maximilian/|access-date=2020-11-27|website=WeExpats|language=en-US}}</ref> | In 1863, the invading French, under [[Napoleon III]] (see above), in alliance with Mexican conservatives and [[Mexican nobility|nobility]], helped create the [[Second Mexican Empire]], and invited Archduke Maximilian, of the [[House of Lorraine|House of Habsburg-Lorraine]], younger brother of the Austrian Emperor [[Franz Joseph I of Austria|Franz Josef I]], to become emperor [[Maximilian of Mexico|Maximilian I of Mexico]]. The childless Maximilian and his consort [[Charlotte of Belgium|Empress Carlota of Mexico]], daughter of [[Leopold I of Belgium]], adopted Agustín's grandsons Agustin and Salvador as his heirs to bolster his claim to the throne of Mexico. Maximilian and Carlota made [[Chapultepec Castle]] their home, which has been the only palace in North America to house sovereigns.{{Citation needed|date=November 2020}} After the withdrawal of French protection in 1867, Maximilian was captured and executed by the liberal forces of [[Benito Juárez]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-07-24|title=Mexican Historical Figures: Maximilian I|url=https://weexpats.com/mexican-historical-figures-maximilian/|access-date=2020-11-27|website=WeExpats|language=en-US}}</ref> | ||
This empire led to French influence in the Mexican culture and also [[French Mexican|immigration from France]], Belgium, and Switzerland to Mexico. Maximilian's closest living agnatic relative is [[Karl von Habsburg]], the head of the House of Habsburg. | This empire led to French influence in the Mexican culture and also [[French Mexican|immigration from France]], Belgium, and Switzerland to Mexico. Maximilian's closest living agnatic relative is [[Karl von Habsburg]], the head of the House of Habsburg. | ||
| Line 221: | Line 229: | ||
The term "king of kings" is used for the "emperor".<ref name="malinowski1619"/> The title [[King of Kings]] takes various forms depending on the language, and was used not only in Iran but also in countries surrounding Iran. | The term "king of kings" is used for the "emperor".<ref name="malinowski1619"/> The title [[King of Kings]] takes various forms depending on the language, and was used not only in Iran but also in countries surrounding Iran. | ||
* ''[[King of Kings#Assyria and Babylon|Šar Šarrāni]]'',<ref name="malinowski78">{{Cite book |author-last=Malinowski |author-first=Gościwit |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110731590-002/html?lang=en |title=Empire and Politics in the Eastern and Western | * ''[[King of Kings#Assyria and Babylon|Šar Šarrāni]]'',<ref name="malinowski78">{{Cite book |author-last=Malinowski |author-first=Gościwit |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110731590-002/html?lang=en |title=Empire and Politics in the Eastern and Western Civilisations |chapter=''Imperator-Huangdi'': The Idea of the Highest Universal Divine Ruler in the West and China |pages=7–8 |editor-last1=Balbo |editor-first1=Andrea |editor-last2=Ahn |editor-first2=Jaewon |editor-last3=Kim |editor-first3=Kihoon |year=2022 |publisher=De Gruyter |doi=10.1515/9783110731590-002 |isbn=978-3-11-073159-0 }}</ref> the king of kings form of ''Šar'', used in [[Assyria]], [[Babylonia]], etc. | ||
* ''[[King of kings|Shahanshah]]'',<ref name="malinowski78"/> the king of kings form of ''[[Shah]]'', used in Iran, etc. | * ''[[King of kings|Shahanshah]]'',<ref name="malinowski78"/> the king of kings form of ''[[Shah]]'', used in Iran, etc. | ||
* ''[[King of Kings#Hellenic usage|Basileus Basileōn]]'',<ref name="malinowski78"/> the king of kings form of ''[[Basileus]]'', used in Macedonia, Byzantine, etc. | * ''[[King of Kings#Hellenic usage|Basileus Basileōn]]'',<ref name="malinowski78"/> the king of kings form of ''[[Basileus]]'', used in Macedonia, Byzantine, etc. | ||
| Line 235: | Line 243: | ||
=== Iran === | === Iran === | ||
{{Main|Shahanshah|List of monarchs of Iran|Achaemenid Empire|List of monarchs of Parthia|List of monarchs of the Sasanian Empire}} | {{Main|Shahanshah|List of monarchs of Iran|Achaemenid Empire|List of monarchs of Parthia|List of monarchs of the Sasanian Empire}} | ||
[[File:Darius I.jpg|thumb|Aechaemenid Emperor [[Darius the Great]], from [[Behistun Inscription]].]] | [[File:Darius I.jpg|thumb|Aechaemenid Emperor [[Darius the Great]], from [[Behistun Inscription]].]] | ||
Persian monarchs | Persian monarchs adopted the imperial title ''[[shahanshah]]'' (Persian: “[[King of Kings]]”) to denote supremacy over subordinate kings ([[shah]]). The title was used by the rulers of the [[Achaemenid Empire|Achaemenid]], [[Arsacid]], and [[Sasanian Empire|Sasanian]] dynasty, and is commonly translated as “King of Kings”. From the [[Safavid dynasty]] in the 16th century onward, the shortened form ''shah'' became the standard royal title. Iranian rulers were typically regarded in the West as emperors. | ||
The use of ''shahanshah'' is attested from the reign of [[Darius the Great|Darius I]], reflecting the extensive territorial scope of the [[Persian Empire (dynasty)|Persian Empire]], which at its height extended from the Indian subcontinent to parts of Greece and Egypt.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Darius I|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Darius_I/|access-date=2020-11-27|website=[[World History Encyclopedia]]|date=10 April 2017 }}</ref> Sasanian rulers further styled themselves “King of Kings of Iranians and [[Aneran|non-Iranians]]” to emphasise sovereignty over both Iranian and non-Iranian lands. | |||
The last Iranian monarch to bear the title ''shahanshah'' was Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was deposed during the [[Iranian Revolution]] in 1979. | |||
===Ottoman Empire=== | ===Ottoman Empire=== | ||
{{Main|List of Sultans of the Ottoman Empire}} | {{Main|List of Sultans of the Ottoman Empire}} | ||
[[File:Suleiman Agostino.JPG|thumb|upright|[[Agostino Veneziano]]'s engraving of [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] emperor [[Suleiman the Magnificent]] wearing his [[Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian Helmet|Venetian Helmet]]{{NoteTag|Agostino never saw the Sultan, but probably did see and sketch the helmet in Venice.}}]] | [[File:Suleiman Agostino.JPG|thumb|upright|[[Agostino Veneziano]]'s engraving of [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] emperor [[Suleiman the Magnificent]] wearing his [[Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian Helmet|Venetian Helmet]]{{NoteTag|Agostino never saw the Sultan, but probably did see and sketch the helmet in Venice.}}]] | ||
[[List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire|Ottoman rulers]] held [[List of Ottoman titles and appellations|many titles and appellations]] denoting their | [[List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire|Ottoman rulers]] held [[List of Ottoman titles and appellations|many titles and appellations]] denoting their imperial status. These included [[Sultan of Sultans]], [[Padishah]], and [[Khagan|Hakan]]. | ||
The full style of the Ottoman sultan once the empire's frontiers had | The full style of the Ottoman sultan once the empire's frontiers had stabilised became:<ref>{{Cite web |title=TheOttomans.org – The Ottomans History |url=http://theottomans.org/english/family/index.asp |access-date=2022-04-14 |website=theottomans.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-01-10 |title=Turkish And Ottoman Nobility And Royalty - Nobility Titles – Genuine Titles Of Nobility For Sale |url=https://nobilitytitles.net/turkish-ottoman-nobility-royalty/ |access-date=2022-04-14 |website=Nobility Titles |language=en}}</ref> | ||
{{blockquote|Sultan (given name) [[Khan (title)|Khan]], Sovereign of [[Ottoman dynasty|The Sublime House of Osman]], {{lang|tr|[[Sultan of Sultans|Sultan us-Selatin]]}} (Sultan of Sultans), {{lang|ota-Latn|[[Khagan|Hakan]]}} (Khan of Khans), [[Amir al-Mu'minin|Commander of the faithful]] and [[Ottoman Caliphate|Successor of the Prophet of the Lord of the Universe]], [[Protector (title)#Islamic|Custodian]] of the Holy Cities of [[Mecca]], [[Medina]] and [[Jerusalem#Ottoman rule|Quds]] (Jerusalem), [[Padishah]] (Emperor) of The Three Cities of [[History of Istanbul#Ottoman Empire|Istanbul]] (Constantinople), [[Edirne]] (Adrianople) and [[Bursa]], and of the Cities of [[Damascus#The Ottoman conquest|Châm]] (Damascus) and [[Egypt Eyalet|Cairo]] (Egypt), of all [[Azerbaijan (Iran)|Azerbaijan]], of the [[Maghreb]], of [[Cyrenaica|Barkah]], of [[Kairouan]], of [[Aleppo|Alep]], of [[History of Iraq#Ottoman Iraq and Mamluk rule|the Arab and Persian Iraq]], of [[Basra Vilayet|Basra]], of [[Al-Ahsa Oasis|El Hasa]] strip, of [[Raqqa]], of [[Mosul Vilayet|Mosul]], of [[Parthia]], of {{lang|ota-Latn|[[Diyarbekir Vilayet|Diyâr-ı Bekr]]}}, of [[Cilicia#Ottoman Empire|Cilicia]], of the provinces of [[Erzurum Eyalet|Erzurum]], of [[Rûm Eyalet|Sivas]], of [[Adana Eyalet|Adana]], of [[Karaman Eyalet|Karaman]], of [[Eyalet of Van|Van]], of Barbaria, of [[Habesh Eyalet|Habech]] (Abyssinia), of [[Ottoman Tunisia|Tunisia]], of [[Ottoman Tripolitania|Tripoli]], of [[Ottoman Syria|Châm]] (Syria), of [[Ottoman Cyprus|Cyprus]], of [[Rhodes]], of [[History of Crete#Venetian and Ottoman Crete|Crete]], of the province of [[Morea Eyalet|Morea]] (Peloponnese), of [[Mediterranean Sea|Bahr-i Sefid]] (Mediterranean Sea), of [[Black Sea|Bahr-i Siyah]] (Black Sea), of [[Anatolia Eyalet|Anatolia]], of [[Rumelia]] (the European part of the Empire), of [[Baghdad Vilayet|Bagdad]], of [[Kurdistan]], of [[Ottoman Greece|Greece]], of [[Turkestan]], of [[Tartary]], of [[Circassia]], of the two regions of [[Kabardino-Balkaria|Kabarda]], of [[History of Georgia (country)#Ottoman and Iranian domination|Gorjestan]] (Georgia), of the [[Cumania|steppe]] of [[Kipchaks]], of the whole [[Khanate of Kazan|country]] of the [[Tatars]], of [[Feodosia#Kefe (Ottoman)|Kefa]] (Theodosia) and of all the [[Crimean Khanate|neighbouring regions]], of [[Bosnia Eyalet|Bosnia]], of the City and Fort of [[Belgrade#Ottoman rule and Austrian invasions|Belgrade]], of the province of [[Ottoman Serbia|Sirbistan]] (Serbia), with [[list of fortifications in Serbia|all the castles]] and [[List of cities in Serbia|cities]], of all [[Albania under the Ottoman Empire|Arnaut]], of all [[Wallachia|Eflak]] (Wallachia) and [[Moldavia|Bogdania]] (Moldavia), as well as [[vassal and tributary states of the Ottoman Empire#List|all the dependencies and borders]], and [[list of Ottoman Empire territories|many others countries and cities]].}} | {{blockquote|Sultan (given name) [[Khan (title)|Khan]], Sovereign of [[Ottoman dynasty|The Sublime House of Osman]], {{lang|tr|[[Sultan of Sultans|Sultan us-Selatin]]}} (Sultan of Sultans), {{lang|ota-Latn|[[Khagan|Hakan]]}} (Khan of Khans), [[Amir al-Mu'minin|Commander of the faithful]] and [[Ottoman Caliphate|Successor of the Prophet of the Lord of the Universe]], [[Protector (title)#Islamic|Custodian]] of the Holy Cities of [[Mecca]], [[Medina]] and [[Jerusalem#Ottoman rule|Quds]] (Jerusalem), [[Padishah]] (Emperor) of The Three Cities of [[History of Istanbul#Ottoman Empire|Istanbul]] (Constantinople), [[Edirne]] (Adrianople) and [[Bursa]], and of the Cities of [[Damascus#The Ottoman conquest|Châm]] (Damascus) and [[Egypt Eyalet|Cairo]] (Egypt), of all [[Azerbaijan (Iran)|Azerbaijan]], of the [[Maghreb]], of [[Cyrenaica|Barkah]], of [[Kairouan]], of [[Aleppo|Alep]], of [[History of Iraq#Ottoman Iraq and Mamluk rule|the Arab and Persian Iraq]], of [[Basra Vilayet|Basra]], of [[Al-Ahsa Oasis|El Hasa]] strip, of [[Raqqa]], of [[Mosul Vilayet|Mosul]], of [[Parthia]], of {{lang|ota-Latn|[[Diyarbekir Vilayet|Diyâr-ı Bekr]]}}, of [[Cilicia#Ottoman Empire|Cilicia]], of the provinces of [[Erzurum Eyalet|Erzurum]], of [[Rûm Eyalet|Sivas]], of [[Adana Eyalet|Adana]], of [[Karaman Eyalet|Karaman]], of [[Eyalet of Van|Van]], of Barbaria, of [[Habesh Eyalet|Habech]] (Abyssinia), of [[Ottoman Tunisia|Tunisia]], of [[Ottoman Tripolitania|Tripoli]], of [[Ottoman Syria|Châm]] (Syria), of [[Ottoman Cyprus|Cyprus]], of [[Rhodes]], of [[History of Crete#Venetian and Ottoman Crete|Crete]], of the province of [[Morea Eyalet|Morea]] (Peloponnese), of [[Mediterranean Sea|Bahr-i Sefid]] (Mediterranean Sea), of [[Black Sea|Bahr-i Siyah]] (Black Sea), of [[Anatolia Eyalet|Anatolia]], of [[Rumelia]] (the European part of the Empire), of [[Baghdad Vilayet|Bagdad]], of [[Kurdistan]], of [[Ottoman Greece|Greece]], of [[Turkestan]], of [[Tartary]], of [[Circassia]], of the two regions of [[Kabardino-Balkaria|Kabarda]], of [[History of Georgia (country)#Ottoman and Iranian domination|Gorjestan]] (Georgia), of the [[Cumania|steppe]] of [[Kipchaks]], of the whole [[Khanate of Kazan|country]] of the [[Tatars]], of [[Feodosia#Kefe (Ottoman)|Kefa]] (Theodosia) and of all the [[Crimean Khanate|neighbouring regions]], of [[Bosnia Eyalet|Bosnia]], of the City and Fort of [[Belgrade#Ottoman rule and Austrian invasions|Belgrade]], of the province of [[Ottoman Serbia|Sirbistan]] (Serbia), with [[list of fortifications in Serbia|all the castles]] and [[List of cities in Serbia|cities]], of all [[Albania under the Ottoman Empire|Arnaut]], of all [[Wallachia|Eflak]] (Wallachia) and [[Moldavia|Bogdania]] (Moldavia), as well as [[vassal and tributary states of the Ottoman Empire#List|all the dependencies and borders]], and [[list of Ottoman Empire territories|many others countries and cities]].}} | ||
After the [[Capture of Constantinople|Ottoman capture of Constantinople]] in 1453, the Ottoman sultans began to style themselves '''Kaysar-i Rum''' ( | After the [[Capture of Constantinople|Ottoman capture of Constantinople]] in 1453, the Ottoman sultans began to style themselves '''Kaysar-i Rum''' (Caesar of the Romans) as they asserted themselves to be the heirs to the Roman Empire by right of conquest. The title was of such importance to them that it led them to eliminate the various Byzantine successor states—and therefore rival claimants—over the next eight years. Though the term "emperor" was rarely used by Westerners for the [[Ottoman sultan]], it was generally accepted by Westerners that he had imperial status. | ||
[[Harun Osman]] is currently the head of the [[Ottoman dynasty]]. | [[Harun Osman]] is currently the head of the [[Ottoman dynasty]]. | ||
| Line 255: | Line 267: | ||
{{further|:hi:सम्राट्|Chakravartin}} | {{further|:hi:सम्राट्|Chakravartin}} | ||
In the [[Vedic period]], there was a [[Federal monarchy|federal]] [[empire|imperial system]] called the ''Samrajya system'' and its emperor's title was ''Samrat'' ([[:hi:सम्राट्]]).<ref name="mahajan">{{Cite book |author=Mahajan V.D. |author-link=Vidya Dhar Mahajan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7TJlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA166 |page=166|title=Ancient India |publisher=S. Chand Publishing |isbn=978-93-5253-132-5 |language=en}}</ref> Those monarchs, who could bring under subjection many rulers, claimed the title of ''Samrat''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Luniya |first=Bhanwarlal Nathuram |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b0k9AAAAMAAJ&q=%22Those+monarchs,+who+could+bring+under+subjection+many+petty+rulers+called+Rajans,+claimed+the+title+of+Samrat.%22 |title=Life and Culture in Ancient India: From the Earliest Times to 1000 A.D. |date=1978 |publisher=Lakshmi Narain Agarwal |language=en|page=130}}</ref> | In the [[Vedic period]], there was a [[Federal monarchy|federal]] [[empire|imperial system]] called the ''Samrajya system'' and its emperor's title was ''Samrat'' ([[:hi:सम्राट्]]).<ref name="mahajan">{{Cite book |author=Mahajan V.D. |author-link=Vidya Dhar Mahajan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7TJlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA166 |page=166|title=Ancient India |publisher=S. Chand Publishing |isbn=978-93-5253-132-5 |language=en}}</ref> Those monarchs, who could bring under subjection many rulers, claimed the title of ''Samrat''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Luniya |first=Bhanwarlal Nathuram |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b0k9AAAAMAAJ&q=%22Those+monarchs,+who+could+bring+under+subjection+many+petty+rulers+called+Rajans,+claimed+the+title+of+Samrat.%22 |title=Life and Culture in Ancient India: From the Earliest Times to 1000 A.D. |date=1978 |publisher=Lakshmi Narain Agarwal |language=en|page=130}}</ref> ''Samrajni'' means empress.<ref>{{Cite book |author=Bhagwat Saran Upadhya |url=https://archive.org/details/dli.csl.3775/page/129/mode/1up |page=129 |title=Women in Rigveda |date=1941 |publisher=Nand Kishore & Bros.}}</ref> | ||
Another type of [[Ancient india|Indian]] imperialism was called the ''Chakravarti system''.<ref name="mahajan"/> Emperors wished to be called ''[[Chakravarti (Sanskrit term)|Chakravarti]]'',<ref name="derrett"/> meaning "[[Universal monarchy|universal monarch]]."<ref name="britannica"/> | Another type of [[Ancient india|Indian]] imperialism was called the ''Chakravarti system''.<ref name="mahajan"/> Emperors wished to be called ''[[Chakravarti (Sanskrit term)|Chakravarti]]'',<ref name="derrett"/> meaning "[[Universal monarchy|universal monarch]]."<ref name="britannica"/> ''Cakravartini'' means empress.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TGLLQ8_COYkC&pg=PA162 |page=162 |title=Learner's Multilingual Dictionary: English-English-Kannada/Malayalam/Tamil/Telugu |date=2012 |publisher=Pearson |isbn=978-81-317-1873-5 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
The actual condition of ''Samrat'', which is an objective term, and the theoretical status of ''Chakravarti'', which is a poetical concept, were connected in point of psychology.<ref name="derrett">{{Cite book |last=Derrett |first=J. Duncan M. |author-link=J. Duncan M. Derrett|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uOP7EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 |chapter=Hindu empires|page=2|title=Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law: Volume One: Dharmasastra and Related Ideas |date=2023-12-11 |orig-date=1976|publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-64389-5 |language=en}}</ref> | The actual condition of ''Samrat'', which is an objective term, and the theoretical status of ''Chakravarti'', which is a poetical concept, were connected in point of psychology.<ref name="derrett">{{Cite book |last=Derrett |first=J. Duncan M. |author-link=J. Duncan M. Derrett|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uOP7EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 |chapter=Hindu empires|page=2|title=Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law: Volume One: Dharmasastra and Related Ideas |date=2023-12-11 |orig-date=1976|publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-64389-5 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
| Line 266: | Line 278: | ||
From 322 to 185 BC the Indian subcontinent was dominated by the [[Maurya Empire|Maurya dynasty]] of Magadha, whose monarchs used the title(s) of Chakravarti or Samrat. | From 322 to 185 BC the Indian subcontinent was dominated by the [[Maurya Empire|Maurya dynasty]] of Magadha, whose monarchs used the title(s) of Chakravarti or Samrat. | ||
[[Chandragupta Maurya|Chandragupta]] of the [[Maurya Empire]] is referred to as the first emperor of the | [[Chandragupta Maurya|Chandragupta]] of the [[Maurya Empire]] is referred to as the first emperor of the first unified [[Indian subcontinent]].<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/biography/Chandragupta Chandragupta] in the [[Encyclopædia Britannica]]</ref> The first references to a ''Chakravartin'' as a secular monarch appear in reference to [[Ashoka]] of the [[Maurya Empire]].<ref name="britannica">[https://www.britannica.com/topic/chakravartin Chakravartin] in the [[Encyclopædia Britannica]]</ref> | ||
=== Delhi Sultanate === | === Delhi Sultanate === | ||
| Line 273: | Line 285: | ||
=== Mughal Empire === | === Mughal Empire === | ||
{{further|Emperor of Hindustan | {{further|Mughal Emperor|Padishah|Emperor of Hindustan}} | ||
[[File:The Elderly Akbar Receives Murtaza Khan.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Mughal Empire|Mughal]] Emperor [[Akbar]] in his [[Durbar (court)|Durbar]]]] | [[File:The Elderly Akbar Receives Murtaza Khan.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Mughal Empire|Mughal]] Emperor [[Akbar]] in his [[Durbar (court)|Durbar]]]] | ||
From the 14th century until the 19th century the Indian subcontinent was dominated by predominantly Muslim rulers like the [[Mughal Empire|Mughals]], whose rulers used the title [[King of Kings|Shahenshah]] and [[Padishah]] (or Badshah) of [[Hindustan]]. | From the 14th century until the 19th century the Indian subcontinent was dominated by predominantly Muslim rulers like the [[Mughal Empire|Mughals]] in the second unified Indian subcontinent,whose rulers used the title [[King of Kings|Shahenshah]] and [[Padishah]] (or Badshah) of [[Hindustan]]. | ||
=== British Raj === | === British Raj === | ||
| Line 286: | Line 298: | ||
* [[Yashodharman]] is designated as ''Samrat'' in an inscription.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dikshitar |first=V. R. Ramachandra |author-link=V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KP_DTtd6kJEC&pg=PA10 |page=10|title=The Gupta Polity |date=1993 |orig-date=1952|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publ. |isbn=978-81-208-1024-2 |language=en}}</ref> | * [[Yashodharman]] is designated as ''Samrat'' in an inscription.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dikshitar |first=V. R. Ramachandra |author-link=V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KP_DTtd6kJEC&pg=PA10 |page=10|title=The Gupta Polity |date=1993 |orig-date=1952|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publ. |isbn=978-81-208-1024-2 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
* The [[Vakataka dynasty|Vakataka]] ruler [[Pravarasena I]] was titled ''Samrat''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Singh |first=Upinder |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GW5Gx0HSXKUC&pg=PA482 |title=A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century |date=2008 |publisher=Pearson Education India |isbn=978-81-317-1677-9 |pages=482 |language=en|quote=Pravarasena I was the only Vakataka king with the imperial title ''samrat''; the others had the relatively modest title ''maharaja''.}}</ref> | * The [[Vakataka dynasty|Vakataka]] ruler [[Pravarasena I]] was titled ''Samrat''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Singh |first=Upinder |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GW5Gx0HSXKUC&pg=PA482 |title=A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century |date=2008 |publisher=Pearson Education India |isbn=978-81-317-1677-9 |pages=482 |language=en|quote=Pravarasena I was the only Vakataka king with the imperial title ''samrat''; the others had the relatively modest title ''maharaja''.}}</ref> | ||
* The [[Gupta emperor]]s were known by various titles, such as ''Samrat'', ''Chakravartin'', etc.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Mahajan |first=V. D. |author-link=Vidya Dhar Mahajan |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sjscEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA407 |page=407|title=Ancient India |publisher=S. Chand Publishing |edition=14 |chapter=India during the Gupta Age |isbn=978-93-5283-603-1 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
* The ruler of Kalinga, [[Kharavela]] of the [[Mahameghavahana dynasty]], used the title ''[[Kalinga (region)|Kalinga]]-[[Chakravartin]]''.<ref name="MajumdarBhavan1951">{{cite book |author=[[Ramesh Chandra Majumdar]] |title=The History and Culture of the Indian People: The age of imperial unity |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-3dDAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Kalinga-chakravartin%22 |page=213|year=1951 |publisher=Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan}}</ref> | * The ruler of Kalinga, [[Kharavela]] of the [[Mahameghavahana dynasty]], used the title ''[[Kalinga (region)|Kalinga]]-[[Chakravartin]]''.<ref name="MajumdarBhavan1951">{{cite book |author=[[Ramesh Chandra Majumdar]] |title=The History and Culture of the Indian People: The age of imperial unity |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-3dDAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Kalinga-chakravartin%22 |page=213|year=1951 |publisher=Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan}}</ref> | ||
* [[Lakshmikarna]] of the [[Kalachuris of Tripuri|Kalachuri dynasty]] proclaimed himself ''[[Chakravartin]]''. | * [[Lakshmikarna]] of the [[Kalachuris of Tripuri|Kalachuri dynasty]] proclaimed himself ''[[Chakravartin]]''. | ||
* The [[Chola Empire|Imperial Cholas]] used the | * The [[Chola Empire|Imperial Cholas]] used the titles of ''[[Chakravarti (Sanskrit term)|Chakravartigal]]''<ref>{{Cite book |last=Thapar |first=Romila |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-5irrXX0apQC&pg=PA366 |page=366|title=Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300 |year=2004 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-24225-8 |language=en|quote=The unobtrusive titles used by the early Chola kings were replaced with high-sounding ones, such as ''chakravartigal'' (emperor, the equivalent of the northern ''chakravartin'').}}</ref> and ''Tribhuvana-Chakravartin'' ("emperor of the three worlds").<ref>{{Cite book |last=Eraly |first=Abraham |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=te1sqTzTxD8C&pg=PA103 |title=The First Spring: The Golden Age of India |date=2011 |publisher=Penguin Books India |isbn=978-0-670-08478-4 |page=103|language=en}}</ref> | ||
* The term ''Chakravartin'' was used by the [[Pallavas]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Menon |first=Indira |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ym17YA_jhCgC&pg=PT4 |page=14|title=Rhythms in Stone: The Temples of South India |date=2013 |publisher=Ambi Knowledge Resource |isbn=978-81-903591-3-9 |language=en}}</ref> | * The term ''Chakravartin'' was used by the [[Pallavas]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Menon |first=Indira |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ym17YA_jhCgC&pg=PT4 |page=14|title=Rhythms in Stone: The Temples of South India |date=2013 |publisher=Ambi Knowledge Resource |isbn=978-81-903591-3-9 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
* The [[Pandyan Dynasty|Pandyan]] Emperor [[Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan I]] was titled ''Tribhuvana-Cakravarti'' ("emperor of the three worlds").<ref>{{Cite book |last=Leão |first=David Pierdominici |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KP5BEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA165 |page=165|title=Breaking the Crown of Indra: The Pāṇḍyas and Their Dynastic Identity in the South Indian Context |date=2025-01-27 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-72150-0 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
* The [[Pandyan Dynasty|Pandyan]] Emperor [[Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan I]] was titled ''Tribhuvana-Cakravarti'' | |||
* Dharasena IV, the [[Maitraka dynasty|Maitraka]] ruler of [[Kingdom of Valabhi|Valabhi]], called himself ''Chakravartin''.<ref>{{Cite book |author=Mahajan V.D. |author-link=Vidya Dhar Mahajan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7TJlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA449 |page=449|title=Ancient India |publisher=S. Chand Publishing |isbn=978-93-5253-132-5 |language=en}}</ref> | * Dharasena IV, the [[Maitraka dynasty|Maitraka]] ruler of [[Kingdom of Valabhi|Valabhi]], called himself ''Chakravartin''.<ref>{{Cite book |author=Mahajan V.D. |author-link=Vidya Dhar Mahajan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7TJlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA449 |page=449|title=Ancient India |publisher=S. Chand Publishing |isbn=978-93-5253-132-5 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
* [[Veera Ballala II]] of the [[Hoysala Kingdom]] assumed the title ''Hoysala-Chakravartin''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Aiyangar |first=Sakkottai Krishnaswami |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=htArUg0OMpcC&pg=PA252 |page=252 |title=Ancient India: Collected Essays on the Literary and Political History of Southern India |date=2004 |publisher=Asian Educational Services |isbn=978-81-206-1850-3 |language=en}}</ref> | * [[Veera Ballala II]] of the [[Hoysala Kingdom]] assumed the title ''Hoysala-Chakravartin''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Aiyangar |first=Sakkottai Krishnaswami |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=htArUg0OMpcC&pg=PA252 |page=252 |title=Ancient India: Collected Essays on the Literary and Political History of Southern India |date=2004 |publisher=Asian Educational Services |isbn=978-81-206-1850-3 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
| Line 299: | Line 311: | ||
===Ethiopia=== | ===Ethiopia=== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Ethiopia}} | {{Main|Emperor of Ethiopia}} | ||
{{More citations needed|date=February 2012}} | |||
{{More citations needed section|date=February 2012}} | |||
[[File:Haile Selassie Portrait.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Haile Selassie]], last [[Emperor of Ethiopia]] who ruled from 1930 to 1974]] | [[File:Haile Selassie Portrait.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Haile Selassie]], last [[Emperor of Ethiopia]] who ruled from 1930 to 1974]] | ||
From 1270 the [[Solomonic dynasty]] of [[Ethiopian Empire|Ethiopia]] used the title {{transliteration|am|Nəgusä Nägäst}}, literally "King of Kings". The use of the ''king of kings'' style began a millennium earlier in this region, however, with the title being used by the kings of [[Kingdom of Aksum|Aksum]], beginning with [[Sembrouthes]] in the 3rd century. | From 1270 the [[Solomonic dynasty]] of [[Ethiopian Empire|Ethiopia]] used the title {{transliteration|am|Nəgusä Nägäst}}, literally "King of Kings". The use of the ''king of kings'' style began a millennium earlier in this region, however, with the title being used by the kings of [[Kingdom of Aksum|Aksum]], beginning with [[Sembrouthes]] in the 3rd century. | ||
| Line 311: | Line 324: | ||
===Central African Empire=== | ===Central African Empire=== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Central Africa}} | {{Main|Emperor of Central Africa}} | ||
In 1976, President [[Jean-Bédel Bokassa]] of the [[Central African Republic]], proclaimed the country to be an autocratic [[Central African Empire]], and made himself Emperor as Bokassa I. The expenses of his coronation ceremony actually bankrupted the country. He was overthrown three years later and the republic was restored.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/headsofstatesgov00lent|title=Heads of states and governments: a worldwide encyclopedia of over 2,300 leaders, 1945 through 1992|last=Lentz|first=Harris M|date=1994-01-01|publisher=McFarland|isbn=0899509266|location=Jefferson, N.C.|language=en|url-access=registration}}</ref> | In 1976, President [[Jean-Bédel Bokassa]] of the [[Central African Republic]], proclaimed the country to be an autocratic [[Central African Empire]], and made himself Emperor as Bokassa I. The expenses of his coronation ceremony actually bankrupted the country. He was overthrown three years later and the republic was restored.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/headsofstatesgov00lent|title=Heads of states and governments: a worldwide encyclopedia of over 2,300 leaders, 1945 through 1992|last=Lentz|first=Harris M|date=1994-01-01|publisher=McFarland|isbn=0899509266|location=Jefferson, N.C.|language=en|url-access=registration}}</ref> | ||
| Line 316: | Line 330: | ||
{{See also|Emperor at home, king abroad}} | {{See also|Emperor at home, king abroad}} | ||
{{More citations needed section|date=June 2015}} | {{More citations needed section|date=June 2015}} | ||
[[wikt:皇帝|皇帝]] is the title of emperors in East Asia. An emperor is called ''Huángdì'' in Chinese, ''Hwangje'' in Korean, ''Hoàng đế'' in Vietnamese, and ''Kōtei'' in Japanese, but these are all just their respective pronunciations of the Chinese character 皇帝. | [[wikt:皇帝|皇帝]] is the title of emperors in East Asia. An emperor is called ''Huángdì'' in Chinese, ''Hwangje'' in Korean, ''Hoàng đế'' in Vietnamese, and ''Kōtei'' in Japanese, but these are all just their respective pronunciations of the Chinese character 皇帝. Other imperial titles such as ''[[Tennō]]'' (天皇), ''Mikado'' (帝), and ''Seonghwang'' (성황; 聖皇) are merely variations of the Chinese character 皇帝.{{NoteTag|天皇 (''[[tennō]]'') is a combination of [[天]] (''ten''), meaning "heavenly", and 皇, an abbreviation of 皇帝 (''kōtei''). 帝 (''mikado'') is an abbreviation of 皇帝 (''kōtei''). 성황 or 聖皇 (''seonghwang'') is a combination of 聖 (''seong''), meaning "holy", and 皇, an abbreviation of 皇帝 (''hwangje'').}} | ||
The rulers of China and (once Westerners became aware of the role) Japan were always accepted in the West as emperors, and referred to as such. The claims of other East Asian monarchies to the title may have been accepted for diplomatic purposes, but it was not necessarily used in more general contexts. | The rulers of China and (once Westerners became aware of the role) Japan were always accepted in the West as emperors, and referred to as such. The claims of other East Asian monarchies to the title may have been accepted for diplomatic purposes, but it was not necessarily used in more general contexts. | ||
| Line 322: | Line 336: | ||
===China=== | ===China=== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of China}} | {{Main|Emperor of China}} | ||
The [[East Asian]] tradition is different from the Roman tradition, having arisen separately. What links them together is the use of the Chinese logographs 皇 (''huáng'') and 帝 (''dì'') which together or individually are imperial. Because of the cultural influence of China, China's | The [[East Asian]] tradition is different from the Roman tradition, having arisen separately. What links them together is the use of the Chinese logographs 皇 (''huáng'') and 帝 (''dì'') which together or individually are imperial. Because of the cultural influence of China, China's neighbours adopted these titles or had their native titles conform in ''[[hanzi]]''. Anyone who spoke to the emperor was to address the emperor as bìxià (陛下, lit. the "Bottom of the Steps"), corresponding to the [[Imperial Majesty (style)|Imperial Majesty]]"; shèngshàng (聖上, lit. Holy Highness); or wànsuì (万岁, lit. "You, of Ten Thousand Years"). | ||
In 221 BC, [[Qin Shi Huang|Ying Zheng]], who was [[Chinese sovereign|king]] of [[Qin dynasty|Qin]] at the time, proclaimed himself ''[[Shi Huangdi]]'' (始皇帝), which translates as "first emperor". ''Huangdi'' is composed of ''huang'' ("august one", 皇) and ''di'' ("sage-king", 帝), and referred to legendary/mythological [[Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors|sage-emperors]] living several millennia earlier, of which three were ''huang'' and five were ''di''. Thus Ying Zheng became [[Qin Shi Huang]], abolishing the system where the ''huang''/''di'' titles were reserved to dead and/or mythological rulers. Since then, the title "king" became a lower ranked title, and later divided into two grades. Although not as popular, the title 王 ''wang'' (king or prince) was still used by many monarchs and dynasties in China up to the [[Taiping Rebellion|Taipings]] in the 19th century. 王 is pronounced ''vương'' in Vietnamese, ''ō'' in Japanese, and ''wang'' in Korean. | In 221 BC, [[Qin Shi Huang|Ying Zheng]], who was [[Chinese sovereign|king]] of [[Qin dynasty|Qin]] at the time, proclaimed himself ''[[Shi Huangdi]]'' (始皇帝), which translates as "first emperor". ''Huangdi'' is composed of ''huang'' ("august one", 皇) and ''di'' ("sage-king", 帝), and referred to legendary/mythological [[Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors|sage-emperors]] living several millennia earlier, of which three were ''huang'' and five were ''di''. Thus Ying Zheng became [[Qin Shi Huang]], abolishing the system where the ''huang''/''di'' titles were reserved to dead and/or mythological rulers. Since then, the title "king" became a lower ranked title, and later divided into two grades. Although not as popular, the title 王 ''wang'' (king or prince) was still used by many monarchs and dynasties in China up to the [[Taiping Rebellion|Taipings]] in the 19th century. 王 is pronounced ''vương'' in Vietnamese, ''ō'' in Japanese, and ''wang'' in Korean. | ||
| Line 329: | Line 343: | ||
The imperial title continued in China until the [[Qing dynasty]] was overthrown in 1912. The title was briefly revived from 12 December 1915 to 22 March 1916 by President [[Yuan Shikai]] and again in early July 1917 when General [[Zhang Xun (Qing loyalist)|Zhang Xun]] attempted to restore last Qing emperor [[Puyi]] to the throne. Puyi retained the title and attributes of a foreign emperor, as a personal status, until 1924. After the Japanese occupied [[Manchuria]] in 1931, they proclaimed it to be the Empire of [[Manchukuo]], and Puyi became emperor of Manchukuo. This empire ceased to exist when it was occupied by the Soviet [[Red Army]] in 1945.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Manchukuo|title=Manchukuo {{!}} puppet state created by Japan in China [1932]|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2019-06-02}}</ref> | The imperial title continued in China until the [[Qing dynasty]] was overthrown in 1912. The title was briefly revived from 12 December 1915 to 22 March 1916 by President [[Yuan Shikai]] and again in early July 1917 when General [[Zhang Xun (Qing loyalist)|Zhang Xun]] attempted to restore last Qing emperor [[Puyi]] to the throne. Puyi retained the title and attributes of a foreign emperor, as a personal status, until 1924. After the Japanese occupied [[Manchuria]] in 1931, they proclaimed it to be the Empire of [[Manchukuo]], and Puyi became emperor of Manchukuo. This empire ceased to exist when it was occupied by the Soviet [[Red Army]] in 1945.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Manchukuo|title=Manchukuo {{!}} puppet state created by Japan in China [1932]|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2019-06-02}}</ref> | ||
In general, an emperor would have one empress (''Huanghou'', 皇后) at one time, although posthumous entitlement to empress for a [[ | In general, an emperor would have one empress (''Huanghou'', 皇后) at one time, although posthumous entitlement to empress for a [[concubine]] was not uncommon. The earliest known usage of ''huanghou'' was in the [[Han dynasty]]. The emperor would generally select the empress from his concubines. In subsequent dynasties, when the distinction between wife and concubine became more accentuated, the [[crown prince]] would have chosen an empress-designate before his reign. [[Early Imperial China|Imperial China]] produced only one reigning empress, [[Wu Zetian]], and she used the same Chinese title as an emperor (''Huangdi'', 皇帝). Wu Zetian then reigned for about 15 years (AD 690–705). | ||
Under the tributary system of China, monarchs of Korea and Vietnam sometimes called themselves ''emperor'' in their country. They introduced themselves as ''king'' for China and other countries ([[Emperor at home, king abroad]]). In Japan, [[Ashikaga Yoshimitsu]] a [[shogun]] was granted title of ''King of Japan'' for trade by the Ming emperor. However, the Shogun was a subject of the Japanese emperor. It was contrary to rules of tributary system, but the Ming emperor connived it for the purpose of suppressing the [[Wokou]]. | Under the tributary system of China, monarchs of Korea and Vietnam sometimes called themselves ''emperor'' in their country. They introduced themselves as ''king'' for China and other countries ([[Emperor at home, king abroad]]). In Japan, [[Ashikaga Yoshimitsu]] a [[shogun]] was granted title of ''King of Japan'' for trade by the Ming emperor. However, the Shogun was a subject of the Japanese emperor. It was contrary to rules of tributary system, but the Ming emperor connived it for the purpose of suppressing the [[Wokou]]. | ||
| Line 335: | Line 349: | ||
===Japan=== | ===Japan=== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Japan}} | {{Main|Emperor of Japan}} | ||
[[File:Emperor Showa.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Emperor Shōwa]], the last Japanese emperor having ruled with prerogative powers, combined with assumption of divinity (photographed 1926 on his ascendancy to the [[Chrysanthemum Throne]])]] | [[File:Emperor Showa.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Emperor Shōwa]], the last Japanese emperor having ruled with prerogative powers, combined with assumption of divinity (photographed 1926 on his ascendancy to the [[Chrysanthemum Throne]])]] | ||
The earliest emperor recorded in {{Lang|ja-latn|[[Kojiki]]}} and {{Lang|ja-latn|[[Nihon Shoki]]}} is [[Emperor Jimmu]], who is said to be a descendant of [[Amaterasu]]'s grandson Ninigi who descended from Heaven ([[Tenson kōrin]]). If one believes what is written in {{Lang|ja-latn|Nihon Shoki}}, the emperors have an unbroken direct male lineage that goes back more than 2,600 years. | The earliest emperor recorded in {{Lang|ja-latn|[[Kojiki]]}} and {{Lang|ja-latn|[[Nihon Shoki]]}} is [[Emperor Jimmu]], who is said to be a descendant of [[Amaterasu]]'s grandson Ninigi who descended from Heaven ([[Tenson kōrin]]). If one believes what is written in {{Lang|ja-latn|Nihon Shoki}}, the emperors have an unbroken direct male lineage that goes back more than 2,600 years. | ||
In ancient Japan, the earliest titles for the sovereign were either ヤマト大王/大君 (''yamato [[Okimi|ōkimi]]'', Grand King of Yamato), 倭王/倭国王 (''waō''/''wakokuō'', King of Wa, used externally), or 治天下大王 (''amenoshita shiroshimesu | In ancient Japan, the earliest titles for the sovereign were either ヤマト大王/大君 (''yamato [[Okimi|ōkimi]]'', Grand King of Yamato), 倭王/倭国王 (''waō''/''wakokuō'', King of Wa, used externally), or 治天下大王 (''amenoshita shiroshimesu ōkimi'', Grand King who rules all under heaven, used internally). | ||
In 607, [[Empress Suiko]] sent a diplomatic document to China, which she wrote "the emperor of the land of the rising sun (日出處天子) sends a document to the emperor of the land of the setting sun (日沒處天子)" and began to use the title emperor externally.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20191225163843/https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/seminar/19/00080/093000003/ Satoshi Yabuuchi, ''時代背景から知る 仏像の秘密'', The Nikkei], 10 October 2019.</ref> As early as the 7th century, the word 天皇 (which can be read either as ''sumera no mikoto'', divine order, or as ''tennō'', Heavenly Emperor, the latter being derived from a Tang Chinese term referring to the Pole star around which all other stars revolve) began to be used. The earliest use of this term is found on a wooden slat, or ''[[mokkan]]'', unearthed in Asuka-mura, Nara Prefecture in 1998. The slat dated back to the reign of [[Emperor Tenmu]] and [[Empress Jitō]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20180318174952/http://bunshun.jp/articles/-/6397 Masataka Kondo, ''ご存知ですか 3月2日は飛鳥池遺跡で「天皇」木簡が出土したと発表された日です''], 2 March 2018.</ref> The reading 'Tennō' has become the standard title for the Japanese sovereign up to the present age. The term 帝 (''mikado'', Emperor) is also found in literary sources. | In 607, [[Empress Suiko]] sent a diplomatic document to China, which she wrote "the emperor of the land of the rising sun (日出處天子) sends a document to the emperor of the land of the setting sun (日沒處天子)" and began to use the title emperor externally.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20191225163843/https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/seminar/19/00080/093000003/ Satoshi Yabuuchi, ''時代背景から知る 仏像の秘密'', The Nikkei], 10 October 2019.</ref> As early as the 7th century, the word 天皇 (which can be read either as ''sumera no mikoto'', divine order, or as ''tennō'', Heavenly Emperor, the latter being derived from a Tang Chinese term referring to the Pole star around which all other stars revolve) began to be used. The earliest use of this term is found on a wooden slat, or ''[[mokkan]]'', unearthed in Asuka-mura, Nara Prefecture in 1998. The slat dated back to the reign of [[Emperor Tenmu]] and [[Empress Jitō]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20180318174952/http://bunshun.jp/articles/-/6397 Masataka Kondo, ''ご存知ですか 3月2日は飛鳥池遺跡で「天皇」木簡が出土したと発表された日です''], 2 March 2018.</ref> The reading 'Tennō' has become the standard title for the Japanese sovereign up to the present age. The term 帝 (''mikado'', Emperor) is also found in literary sources. | ||
In the Japanese language, the word ''tennō'' is restricted to Japan's own monarch; ''kōtei'' (皇帝) is usually used for foreign emperors. Historically, [[Daijō-tennō|retired emperors]] often kept power over a child-emperor as de facto regent. For a long time, a ''[[shōgun]]'' ( | In the Japanese language, the word ''tennō'' is restricted to Japan's own monarch; ''kōtei'' (皇帝) is usually used for foreign emperors. Historically, [[Daijō-tennō|retired emperors]] often kept power over a child-emperor as de facto regent. For a long time, a ''[[shōgun]]'' (military aristocratic class) or an [[Sesshō and Kampaku|imperial regent]] wielded actual political power.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Spafford | first1=David | title=Emperor and Shogun, Pope and King: The Development of Japan's Warrior Aristocracy | journal=Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts | date=2014 | volume=88 | issue=1–4 | pages=10–19 | doi=10.1086/DIA43493624 | url=https://doi.org/10.1086/DIA43493624 | url-access=subscription }}</ref> In fact, through much of Japanese history, the emperor has been little more than a figurehead. The [[Meiji Restoration]] restored practical abilities and the political system under [[Emperor Meiji]].<ref>Henry Kissinger on China. 2011, p. 79.</ref> The last shogun [[Tokugawa Yoshinobu]] resigned in 1868. | ||
After World War II, all claims of divinity were dropped (see [[Ningen-sengen]]). The Diet acquired all prerogative powers of the Crown, reverting the latter to a ceremonial role.<ref>Although the Emperor of Japan is classified as constitutional monarch among political scientists, the current constitution of Japan defines him only as 'a symbol of the nation' and no subsequent legislation states his status as the [[Head of state]] or equates the Crown synonymously with any government establishment.</ref> By 1979, after the short-lived [[Central African Empire]] (1976–1979), [[Hirohito|Emperor Shōwa]] was the only monarch in the world with the title emperor.{{Failed verification|date=February 2023}} | After World War II, all claims of divinity were dropped (see [[Ningen-sengen]]). The Diet acquired all prerogative powers of the Crown, reverting the latter to a ceremonial role.<ref>Although the Emperor of Japan is classified as constitutional monarch among political scientists, the current constitution of Japan defines him only as 'a symbol of the nation' and no subsequent legislation states his status as the [[Head of state]] or equates the Crown synonymously with any government establishment.</ref> By 1979, after the short-lived [[Central African Empire]] (1976–1979), [[Hirohito|Emperor Shōwa]] was the only monarch in the world with the title emperor.{{Failed verification|date=February 2023}} | ||
As of the early 21st century, Japan's succession law prohibits a female from ascending the throne. With the birth of a [[Aiko, Princess Toshi|daughter]] as the first child of the then-Crown Prince [[Naruhito]], Japan [[Naruhito#Marriage and family|considered abandoning that rule]]. However, shortly after the announcement that [[Kiko, Crown Princess of Japan|Princess Kiko]] was pregnant with her third child, the proposal to alter the [[Imperial Household Law]] was suspended by then-Prime Minister [[Junichiro Koizumi]]. On 3 January 2007, as the child turned out to be a [[Prince Hisahito of Akishino|son]], Prime Minister [[Shinzō Abe]] announced that he would drop the proposal.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070103/ap_on_re_as/japan_imperial_succession| title = Japan Imperial Succession}}</ref><!-- Keep this section updated in line with the page for Emperor of Japan --> | As of the early 21st century, Japan's succession law prohibits a female from ascending the throne. With the birth of a [[Aiko, Princess Toshi|daughter]] as the first child of the then-Crown Prince [[Naruhito]], Japan [[Naruhito#Marriage and family|considered abandoning that rule]]. However, shortly after the announcement that [[Kiko, Crown Princess of Japan|Princess Kiko]] was pregnant with her third child, the proposal to alter the [[Imperial Household Law]] was suspended by then-Prime Minister [[Junichiro Koizumi]]. On 3 January 2007, as the child turned out to be a [[Prince Hisahito of Akishino|son]], Prime Minister [[Shinzō Abe]] announced that he would drop the proposal.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070103/ap_on_re_as/japan_imperial_succession| title = Japan Imperial Succession}}{{Dead link|date=May 2026}}</ref><!-- Keep this section updated in line with the page for Emperor of Japan --> | ||
Emperor Naruhito is the 126th monarch according to Japan's [[List of emperors of Japan|traditional order of succession]]. The second and third in line of succession are [[Fumihito, Prince Akishino]] and [[Prince Hisahito]]. Historically, Japan has had eight reigning empresses who used the genderless title ''Tennō'', rather than the female consort title ''kōgō'' (皇后) or ''chūgū'' (中宮). There is ongoing discussion of the [[Japanese Imperial succession controversy]]. <!-- | Emperor Naruhito is the 126th monarch according to Japan's [[List of emperors of Japan|traditional order of succession]]. The second and third in line of succession are [[Fumihito, Prince Akishino]] and [[Prince Hisahito]]. Historically, Japan has had eight reigning empresses who used the genderless title ''Tennō'', rather than the female consort title ''kōgō'' (皇后) or ''chūgū'' (中宮). There is ongoing discussion of the [[Japanese Imperial succession controversy]]. <!-- | ||
Emperor's highest wife is called Kogo, and the female emperor is not called Kogo but Tenno as her male counterparts. The female emperor should be called (天皇 Ten-no) but Empress is usual in Western parlances. However, how should female emperor's husband be called? It has not been provided in Japan yet, because no female emperor was married when reigning: only single women (widows, unmarrieds) have been female emperors in history, or a wife or widow of an emperor or Crown Prince was made female Tenno (i. e., she was already Kogo or something like it). | Emperor's highest wife is called Kogo, and the female emperor is not called Kogo but Tenno as her male counterparts. The female emperor should be called (天皇 Ten-no) but Empress is usual in Western parlances. However, how should female emperor's husband be called? It has not been provided in Japan yet, because no female emperor was married when reigning: only single women (widows, unmarrieds) have been female emperors in history, or a wife or widow of an emperor or Crown Prince was made female Tenno (i. e., she was already Kogo or something like it). | ||
-->Although current Japanese law prohibits female succession, all Japanese emperors claim to trace their lineage to ''[[Amaterasu]]'', the Sun Goddess of the [[Shinto|Shintō]] [[religion]]. <!-- Shintō religion does not | -->Although current Japanese law prohibits female succession, all Japanese emperors claim to trace their lineage to ''[[Amaterasu]]'', the Sun Goddess of the [[Shinto|Shintō]] [[religion]]. <!-- Shintō religion does not recognise a "supreme" kami, rather, kami and humans alike are viewed equally.--> Thus, the emperor is thought to be the highest authority of the Shinto religion, and one of his duties is to perform Shinto rituals for the people of Japan. | ||
===Korea=== | ===Korea=== | ||
{{Main|Korean imperial titles}} | {{Main|Korean imperial titles}} | ||
[[File:복원품 순종 어진 복원모사도(1).jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Emperor Sunjong]], the last emperor of Korea]] | [[File:복원품 순종 어진 복원모사도(1).jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Emperor Sunjong]], the last emperor of Korea]] | ||
Some rulers of [[Goguryeo]] (37 BC–AD 668) used the title of ''[[Taewang]]'' ({{Korean|태왕|太王|labels=no}}), literally translated as "Greatest King". The title of ''Taewang'' was also used by some rulers of [[Silla]] (57 BC–AD 935), including [[Beopheung of Silla|Beopheung]] and [[Jinheung of Silla|Jinheung]]. | Some rulers of [[Goguryeo]] (37 BC–AD 668) used the title of ''[[Taewang]]'' ({{Korean|태왕|太王|labels=no}}), literally translated as "Greatest King". The title of ''Taewang'' was also used by some rulers of [[Silla]] (57 BC–AD 935), including [[Beopheung of Silla|Beopheung]] and [[Jinheung of Silla|Jinheung]]. | ||
| Line 364: | Line 380: | ||
===Mongolia=== | ===Mongolia=== | ||
{{Main|Khagan|Emperor of Mongolia}} | {{Main|Khagan|Emperor of Mongolia}} | ||
[[File:YuanEmperorAlbumGenghisPortrait.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Genghis Khan]] was the founder and first [[Great khan|Great Khan]] or Emperor of the largest land empire in history, the [[Mongol Empire]]. His reign as emperor lasted from 1206 to 1227 and he is considered by some to be the greatest conqueror of all time.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Weatherford|first=Jack|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AWF_CwAAQBAJ|title=Genghis Khan and the Quest for God: How the World's Greatest Conqueror Gave Us Religious Freedom|date=2016-10-25|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0-7352-2116-1|language=en}}</ref>]] | [[File:YuanEmperorAlbumGenghisPortrait.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Genghis Khan]] was the founder and first [[Great khan|Great Khan]] or Emperor of the largest land empire in history, the [[Mongol Empire]]. His reign as emperor lasted from 1206 to 1227 and he is considered by some to be the greatest conqueror of all time.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Weatherford|first=Jack|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AWF_CwAAQBAJ|title=Genghis Khan and the Quest for God: How the World's Greatest Conqueror Gave Us Religious Freedom|date=2016-10-25|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0-7352-2116-1|language=en}}</ref>]] | ||
The ''[[Book of Wei]]'', a Chinese history book, records that the title [[Khagan]] (可汗) and the title [[Emperor of China|Huángdì]] (皇帝) are the same.<ref>[[:s:zh:魏書/卷103|Book of Wei, vol. 103]]; "「丘豆伐」猶魏言駕馭開張也,「可汗」猶魏言皇帝也。"</ref> In the 13th century, [[Giovanni da Pian del Carpine]] called the Mongol [[great khan]] simply ''[[imperator]]''.<ref name="malinowski1619"/> | The ''[[Book of Wei]]'', a Chinese history book, records that the title [[Khagan]] (可汗) and the title [[Emperor of China|Huángdì]] (皇帝) are the same.<ref>[[:s:zh:魏書/卷103|Book of Wei, vol. 103]]; "「丘豆伐」猶魏言駕馭開張也,「可汗」猶魏言皇帝也。"</ref> In the 13th century, [[Giovanni da Pian del Carpine]] called the Mongol [[great khan]] simply ''[[imperator]]''.<ref name="malinowski1619"/> | ||
| Line 371: | Line 388: | ||
===Vietnam=== | ===Vietnam=== | ||
{{Main|Emperor of Vietnam}} | {{Main|Emperor of Vietnam}} | ||
[[File:Emperor Bảo Đại on his throne (cropped).jpg|thumb|left|upright|Emperor [[Bao Dai]], the last emperor of Vietnam]] | [[File:Emperor Bảo Đại on his throne (cropped).jpg|thumb|left|upright|Emperor [[Bao Dai]], the last emperor of Vietnam]] | ||
[[Đại Việt|Đại Việt Kingdom]] (40–43, 544–602, 938–1407, 1427–1945) (The first ruler of [[Vietnam]] to take the title of Emperor (Hoàng Đế) was the founder of the [[Early Lý dynasty]], [[Lý Nam Đế]], in the year AD 544) | [[Đại Việt|Đại Việt Kingdom]] (40–43, 544–602, 938–1407, 1427–1945) (The first ruler of [[Vietnam]] to take the title of Emperor (Hoàng Đế) was the founder of the [[Early Lý dynasty]], [[Lý Nam Đế]], in the year AD 544) | ||
| Line 380: | Line 398: | ||
The Vietnamese emperors also gave this title to their ancestors who were lords or influential figures in the previous dynasty, as did the Chinese emperors. This practice was one of the many indications that Vietnam considered itself an equal to China which remained intact up to the twentieth century.<ref>{{citation|author=Tuyet Nhung Tran, Anthony J. S. Reid|title=Việt Nam Borderless Histories|year=2006|publisher=The University of Wisconsin Press|location=Madison, Wisconsin|isbn=978-0-299-21770-9|page=67}}</ref> | The Vietnamese emperors also gave this title to their ancestors who were lords or influential figures in the previous dynasty, as did the Chinese emperors. This practice was one of the many indications that Vietnam considered itself an equal to China which remained intact up to the twentieth century.<ref>{{citation|author=Tuyet Nhung Tran, Anthony J. S. Reid|title=Việt Nam Borderless Histories|year=2006|publisher=The University of Wisconsin Press|location=Madison, Wisconsin|isbn=978-0-299-21770-9|page=67}}</ref> | ||
In 1802 the newly established [[Nguyễn dynasty]] requested | In 1802 the newly established [[Nguyễn dynasty]] requested canonisation from the Chinese [[Jiaqing Emperor]] and received the title ''Quốc Vương'' (國王, ''King of a State)'' and the name of the country as ''Việt Nam'' (越南) instead ''Đại Việt'' (大越). To avoid unnecessary armed conflicts, the Vietnamese rulers accepted this in diplomatic relation and [[Emperor at home, king abroad|used the title Emperor only domestically]]. However, Vietnamese rulers never accepted the vassalage relationship with China and always refused to come to Chinese courts to pay homage to Chinese rulers (a sign of vassalage acceptance). China waged a number of wars against Vietnam throughout history, and after each failure, settled for the tributary relationship. The [[Yuan dynasty]] under [[Kublai Khan]] waged three wars against Vietnam to force it into a vassalage relationship but after successive failures, Kublai Khan's successor, [[Temür Khan]], finally settled for a tributary relationship with Vietnam. Vietnam sent tributary missions to China once in three years (with some periods of disruptions) until the 19th century, [[Sino-French War]] France replaced China in control of northern Vietnam.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hurst |first=Ryan |date=2009-05-20 |title=Nigerian Civil War (1967–1970) • |url=https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/nigerian-civil-war-1967-1970/ |access-date=2023-06-08 |language=en-US}}</ref> | ||
The emperors of the last dynasty of Vietnam continued to hold this title until the French conquered Vietnam. The emperor, however, was then a puppet figure only and could easily be disposed of by the French for more pro-France figure. Japan took Vietnam from France and the [[Axis powers|Axis]]-occupied Vietnam was declared an [[Empire of Vietnam|empire]] by the Japanese in March 1945. The line of emperors came to an end with [[Bảo Đại]], who was deposed after the war, although he later served as head of state of [[South Vietnam]] from 1949 to 1955.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Vietnam: A Television History; America's Mandarin (1954–1963); Interview with Ngo Dinh Luyen|url=http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_FF5BADFE44A0417BAA2F1F9C6F206209|access-date=2020-11-27|website=openvault.wgbh.org|date=31 January 1979 }}</ref> | The emperors of the last dynasty of Vietnam continued to hold this title until the French conquered Vietnam. The emperor, however, was then a puppet figure only and could easily be disposed of by the French for more pro-France figure. Japan took Vietnam from France and the [[Axis powers|Axis]]-occupied Vietnam was declared an [[Empire of Vietnam|empire]] by the Japanese in March 1945. The line of emperors came to an end with [[Bảo Đại]], who was deposed after the war, although he later served as head of state of [[South Vietnam]] from 1949 to 1955.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Vietnam: A Television History; America's Mandarin (1954–1963); Interview with Ngo Dinh Luyen|url=http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_FF5BADFE44A0417BAA2F1F9C6F206209|access-date=2020-11-27|website=openvault.wgbh.org|date=31 January 1979 }}</ref> | ||
| Line 401: | Line 419: | ||
Some Buddhist or Hindu monarchs of East and Southeast Asia called Chakravarti were: | Some Buddhist or Hindu monarchs of East and Southeast Asia called Chakravarti were: | ||
* The Wheel-Turning King (Chakravarti) was used by some Chinese monarchs, such as [[Emperor Wu of Liang]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ferguson |first=Andy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7INLEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA183 |pages | * The Wheel-Turning King (Chakravarti) was used by some Chinese monarchs, such as [[Emperor Wu of Liang]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ferguson |first=Andy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7INLEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA183 |pages=183 |title=Tracking Bodhidharma: A Journey to the Heart of Chinese Culture |date=2013-06-11 |publisher=Catapult |isbn=978-1-61902-159-4 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
=183 |title=Tracking Bodhidharma: A Journey to the Heart of Chinese Culture |date=2013-06-11 |publisher=Catapult |isbn=978-1-61902-159-4 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ** The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel was used by some Chinese monarchs, such as [[Empress Wu Zetian]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rothschild |first=N. Harry |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mHmpBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA200 |page=200|title=Emperor Wu Zhao and Her Pantheon of Devis, Divinities, and Dynastic Mothers |date=2015-06-16 |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=978-0-231-53918-0 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
** The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel was used by some Chinese monarchs, such as [[Wu Zetian]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rothschild |first=N. Harry |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mHmpBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA200 |page=200|title=Emperor Wu Zhao and Her Pantheon of Devis, Divinities, and Dynastic Mothers |date=2015-06-16 |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=978-0-231-53918-0 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | |||
** The title [[Emperor Manjushri]], related to the wheel-turning king (Chakravarti), was given to the Chinese [[Qing emperors]] in [[Tibetan Buddhism]] | ** The title [[Emperor Manjushri]], related to the wheel-turning king (Chakravarti), was given to the Chinese [[Qing emperors]] in [[Tibetan Buddhism]] | ||
* The Wheel-Turning King (Chakravarti) was used by some Mongolian monarchs, such as [[Altan Khan]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Perdue |first=Peter C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J4L-_cjmSqoC&pg=PA487 |page=487|title=China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia |date=2009-06-30 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-04202-5 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | * The Wheel-Turning King (Chakravarti) was used by some Mongolian monarchs, such as [[Altan Khan]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Perdue |first=Peter C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J4L-_cjmSqoC&pg=PA487 |page=487|title=China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia |date=2009-06-30 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-04202-5 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
* The Wheel-Turning Sacred King (Chakravarti) was used by some Korean monarchs, such as [[Jinheung of Silla]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=진흥왕(眞興王) |url=https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0055013 |access-date=2025-04-13 |website=[[Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]] |language=ko}}</ref> etc. | * The Wheel-Turning Sacred King (Chakravarti) was used by some Korean monarchs, such as [[Jinheung of Silla]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=진흥왕(眞興王) |url=https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0055013 |access-date=2025-04-13 |website=[[Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]] |language=ko}}</ref> [[Seong of Baekje]],<ref>{{cite journal |last=소 |first=현숙 |title=聖王의 大通寺 創建과 梁 武帝 |trans-title=The Construction of Daetongsa Temple by King Seong of Baekje and the Emperor Wu of Liang Dynasty |journal=백제문화 |year=2019 |language=ko |url=https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002442825 |access-date=2026-05-14}}</ref> etc. | ||
** The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel was used by some Korean monarchs, such as [[Mun of Balhae]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=문왕(文王) |url=https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0019602 |access-date=2025-06-03 |website=[[Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]] |language=ko}}</ref> etc. | ** The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel was used by some Korean monarchs, such as [[Mun of Balhae]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=문왕(文王) |url=https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0019602 |access-date=2025-06-03 |website=[[Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]] |language=ko}}</ref> the [[Goryeo]] monarchs,<ref>{{cite journal |last=박 |first=윤진 |title=고려시대 국왕의 전륜성왕 지칭과 불교적 신성화 |trans-title=The Title “Cakravartin” of Kings in the Goryeo Dynasty and Their Buddhistic Deification |journal=한국중세사연구 |year=2023 |language=ko |url=https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002936271 |access-date=2026-05-14}}</ref> etc. | ||
* The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel (金輪聖王) was used by some Japanese monarchs, such as [[Emperor Go-Daigo]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Conlan |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m34p1f93HogC&pg=PA90 |page=90 |title=From Sovereign to Symbol: An Age of Ritual Determinism in Fourteenth Century Japan |date=2011-11-10 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-977810-2 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | * The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel (金輪聖王) was used by some Japanese monarchs, such as [[Emperor Go-Daigo]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Conlan |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m34p1f93HogC&pg=PA90 |page=90 |title=From Sovereign to Symbol: An Age of Ritual Determinism in Fourteenth Century Japan |date=2011-11-10 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-977810-2 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
* The Chakkraphat (Chakravarti) was used by some [[Ayutthaya Kingdom|Siamese]] monarchs, such as [[Maha Chakkraphat]], etc. | * The Chakkraphat (Chakravarti) was used by some [[Ayutthaya Kingdom|Siamese]] monarchs, such as [[Maha Chakkraphat]],<ref>{{Cite book |editor-last=Reid |editor-first=Anthony |editor-link=Anthony Reid (academic) |chapter=Religious Patterns and Economic Change in Siam in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries |author-first=Yoneo |author-last=Ishii |author-link=Yoneo Ishii |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h2SSpt4YuKwC&pg=PA187 |page=187|title=Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power, and Belief |date=1993 |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=978-0-8014-8093-5 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
* The Cakkavatti (Chakravarti) was used by some [[First Toungoo Empire|Burmese]] monarchs, such as [[Bayinnaung]], etc. | * The Cakkavatti (Chakravarti) was used by some [[First Toungoo Empire|Burmese]] monarchs, such as [[Bayinnaung]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Reid |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Reid (academic)|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OBX1BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA100 |page=100 |title=A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads |date=2015-03-03 |publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]] |isbn=978-1-118-51295-1 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
* The Chakkaphat (Chakravarti) was used by some Lao monarchs, such as [[Chakkaphat Phaen Phaeo]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Holt |first=John Clifford |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dl8EEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA29 |page=29|title=Theravada Traditions: Buddhist Ritual Cultures in Contemporary Southeast Asia and Sri Lanka |date=2017-03-31 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-7245-8 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | * The Chakkaphat (Chakravarti) was used by some Lao monarchs, such as [[Chakkaphat Phaen Phaeo]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Holt |first=John Clifford |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dl8EEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA29 |page=29|title=Theravada Traditions: Buddhist Ritual Cultures in Contemporary Southeast Asia and Sri Lanka |date=2017-03-31 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-7245-8 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
* The Chakravartin was used by some Khmer monarchs, such as [[Jayavarman II]],<ref>{{Cite book |author-last=Coedès |author-first=George |author-link=George Coedès|editor-first=Walter F. |editor-last=Vella|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iDyJBFTdiwoC&pg=PA100 |page=100|title=The | * The Chakravartin was used by some Khmer monarchs, such as [[Jayavarman II]],<ref>{{Cite book |author-last=Coedès |author-first=George |author-link=George Coedès|editor-first=Walter F. |editor-last=Vella|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iDyJBFTdiwoC&pg=PA100 |page=100|title=The Indianised States of Southeast Asia |year=1968 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-0368-1 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
* The Chakravartin was used by some Javanese monarchs, such as [[Airlangga]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hall |first=Kenneth R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fjsEn3w4TPgC&pg=PA149 |pages=148–149|title=A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100–1500 |date=2010-12-28 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing PLC |isbn=978-0-7425-6762-7 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | * The Chakravartin was used by some Javanese monarchs, such as [[Airlangga]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hall |first=Kenneth R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fjsEn3w4TPgC&pg=PA149 |pages=148–149|title=A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100–1500 |date=2010-12-28 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing PLC |isbn=978-0-7425-6762-7 |language=en}}</ref> etc. | ||
** The [[wikt:nyakrawati|Nyakrawati]] (Chakravarti) was used by some Javanese monarchs, such as {{ill|Hanyakrawati|id|Hanyakrawati}}, etc. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 09:36, 17 May 2026
TemplateStyles' src attribute must not be empty.
This article's lead section may be too long for the length of the article. (February 2026) |
Template:Ranks of Nobility Template:Politics
An emperor (from Script error: The function "langx" does not exist., via Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.)[1] is the (male) ruler of an empire. Empress, the female equivalent, may indicate an emperor's wife (empress consort), mother/grandmother (empress dowager/grand empress dowager), or a woman who rules in her own right and name (empress regnant or suo jure). Emperors are generally recognised to be of the highest monarchic honour and rank, surpassing kings. In Europe, the title of Emperor has been used since the Middle Ages, considered in those times equal or almost equal in dignity to that of Pope due to the latter's position as visible head of the Church and spiritual leader of the Catholic part of Western Europe. The emperor of Japan is the only currently reigning monarch whose title is translated into English as "Emperor".
Both emperors and kings are monarchs or sovereigns, both emperor and empress are considered monarchical titles. In as much as there is a strict definition of emperor, it is that an emperor has no relations implying the superiority of any other ruler and typically rules over more than one nation. Therefore, a king might be obliged to pay tribute to another ruler,[2] or be restrained in his actions in some unequal fashion, but an emperor should in theory be completely free of such restraints. However, monarchs heading empires have not always used the title in all contexts—the British sovereign did not assume the title Empress of the British Empire even during the incorporation of India, though she was declared Empress of India.
In Western Europe, the title of Emperor was used exclusively by the Holy Roman Emperor, whose imperial authority was derived from the concept of translatio imperii, i.e., they claimed succession to the authority of the Roman emperors, thus linking themselves to Roman institutions and traditions as part of state ideology. Although initially ruling much of Central Europe and northern Italy, by the 19th century, the emperor exercised little power beyond the German-speaking states.
Although technically an elective title, by the late 16th century, the imperial title had in practice come to be inherited by the Habsburg Archdukes of Austria and, following the Thirty Years' War, their control over the states (outside the Habsburg monarchy, i.e. Austria, Bohemia and various territories outside the empire) had become nearly non-existent. However, Napoleon Bonaparte was crowned Emperor of the French in 1804 and was shortly followed by Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor, who declared himself Emperor of Austria in the same year. The position of Holy Roman Emperor nonetheless continued until Francis II abdicated that position in 1806. In Eastern Europe, the monarchs of Russia also used translatio imperii to wield imperial authority as successors to the Eastern Roman Empire. Their status was officially recognised by the Holy Roman Emperor in 1514, although not officially used by the Russian monarchs until 1547. However, the Russian emperors are better known by their Russian-language title of Tsar even after Peter the Great adopted the title of Emperor of All Russia in 1721.
Historians have liberally used "emperor" and "empire" anachronistically and out of its Roman and European context to describe any large state from the past or the present. Some titles are considered equivalent to "emperor" or are translated as "emperor". Examples of that are Roman emperors' titles, King of Kings, Khalifa, Huangdi, Cakravartin, Great Khan, Aztec monarchs' title, Inca monarchs' title, etc.[3] Sometimes this reference has even extended to non-monarchically ruled states and their spheres of influence, such as the Athenian Empire of the late 5th century BC, the Angevin Empire of the Plantagenets and the Soviet and US "empires" of the Cold War era. However, such "empires" did not need to be headed by an "emperor". "Empire" became identified instead with vast territorial holdings rather than the title of its ruler by the mid-18th century.
For purposes of protocol, the size and scope of a kingdom or empire may determine precedence in international diplomatic relations, but currently, precedence among heads of state who are sovereigns—whether they be kings, queens, emperors, empresses, princes, princesses and presidents may be determined by the size and scope or time that each one has been continuously in office. Outside the European context, "emperor" was the translation given to holders of titles who were accorded the same precedence as European emperors in diplomatic terms. In reciprocity, these rulers might accredit equal titles in their native languages to their European peers. Through centuries of international convention, this has become the dominant rule to identifying an emperor in the modern era.
Roman Empire
TemplateStyles' src attribute must not be empty.
This section needs additional citations for verification. (July 2020) |
Classical Antiquity
When Republican Rome turned into a de facto monarchy in the second half of the 1st century BC, at first there was no name for the title of the new type of monarch. Ancient Romans abhorred the name Rex ("king"), and it was critical to the political order to maintain the forms and pretences of republican rule. Julius Caesar had been Dictator, an acknowledged and traditional office in Republican Rome. Caesar was not the first to hold it, but following his assassination the term was abhorred in Rome.[citation needed]
Augustus, considered the first Roman emperor, established his hegemony by collecting on himself offices, titles, and honours of Republican Rome that had traditionally been distributed to different people who held these roles for a specific time period, often with a colleague. In the process, Augustus concentrated what had been distributed power in one man, all at once, and in practice without a time limit (the powers with nominal time limits were renewed when they lapsed). One of these offices was princeps senatus, ("first man of the Senate") and became changed into Augustus' chief honorific, princeps civitatis ("first citizen") from which the modern English word and title prince is descended as for the term premier. The first period of the Roman Empire, from 27 BC to AD 284, is called the principate for this reason. However, it was the informal descriptive of Imperator ("commander") that became the title increasingly favoured by his successors. Previously bestowed on high officials and military commanders who had imperium, Augustus reserved it exclusively to himself as the ultimate holder of all imperium. (Imperium is Latin for the authority to command, one of a various types of authority delineated in Roman political thought.)
Beginning with Augustus, Imperator appeared in the title of all Roman monarchs through the extinction of the Empire in 1453. After the reign of Augustus' immediate successor Tiberius, being proclaimed imperator was transformed into the act of accession to the head of state. Other honorifics used by the Roman emperors have also come to be synonyms for Emperor:
- Caesar la (as, for example, in Suetonius' Twelve Caesars). This tradition continued in many languages: in German it became "Kaiser"; in certain Slavic languages it became "Tsar"; in Hungarian it became "Császár", and several more variants. The name derived from Julius Caesar's cognomen "Caesar": this cognomen was adopted by all Roman emperors, exclusively by the ruling monarch after the Julio-Claudian dynasty had died out. In this tradition Julius Caesar is sometimes described as the first Caesar/emperor (following Suetonius). This is one of the most enduring titles: Caesar and its transliterations appeared in every year from the time of Caesar Augustus to the modern era.
- Augustus was the honorific first bestowed on Emperor Augustus: on his death it became an official title of his successor and all Roman emperors after him added it to their name. Although it had a high symbolic value, something like "elevated" or "sublime", it was generally not used to indicate the office of Emperor itself. Exceptions include the title of the Augustan History, a semi-historical collection of emperors' biographies of the 2nd and 3rd century. This title also proved very enduring: after the fall of the Roman Empire, the title would be incorporated into the style of the Holy Roman Emperor, a precedent set by Charlemagne, and its Greek translation Sebastos continued to be used in the Byzantine Empire until the Fall of Constantinople in 1453, although it gradually lost its imperial exclusivity. Augustus had (by his last will) granted the feminine form of this honorific (Augusta) to his wife. Since there was no "title" of Empress(-consort) whatsoever, women of the reigning dynasty sought to be granted this honorific, as the highest attainable goal. Few were however granted the title, and it was certainly not a rule that all wives of reigning emperors would receive it.
- Imperator (as, for example, in Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia). In the Roman Republic Imperator meant "(military) commander". In the late Republic, as in the early years of the new monarchy, Imperator was a title granted to Roman generals by their troops and the Roman Senate after a great victory, roughly comparable to field marshal (head or commander of the entire army). For example, in AD 15 Germanicus was proclaimed Imperator during the reign of his adoptive father Tiberius. Soon thereafter "Imperator" became however a title reserved exclusively for the ruling monarch. This led to "Emperor" in English and, among other examples, "Empereur" in French and "Mbreti" in Albanian. The Latin feminine form Imperatrix only developed after "Imperator" had taken on the connotation of "Emperor".
- Autokrator (Αὐτοκράτωρ) or Basileus (βασιλεύς): although the Greeks used equivalents of "Caesar" (Καῖσαρ, Kaisar) and "Augustus" (in two forms: transliterated as Αὔγουστος, Augoustos or translated as Σεβαστός, Sebastos) these were rather used as part of the name of the emperor than as an indication of the office. Instead of developing a new name for the new type of monarchy, they used αὐτοκράτωρ (autokratōr, only partly overlapping with the modern understanding of "autocrat") or βασιλεύς (basileus, until then the usual name for "sovereign"). Autokratōr was essentially used as a translation of the Latin Imperator in Greek-speaking part of the Roman Empire, but also here there is only partial overlap between the meaning of the original Greek and Latin concepts. For the Greeks Autokratōr was not a military title, and was closer to the Latin dictator concept ("the one with unlimited power"), before it came to mean Emperor. Basileus appears not to have been used exclusively in the meaning of "emperor" (and specifically, the Roman/Byzantine emperor) before the 7th century, although it was a standard informal designation of the emperor in the Greek-speaking East. The title was later applied by the rulers of various Eastern Orthodox countries claiming to be the successors of Rome/Byzantium, such as Georgia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Russia.
After the turbulent Year of the Four Emperors in 69, the Flavian dynasty reigned for three decades. The succeeding Nervan-Antonian dynasty, ruling for most of the 2nd century, stabilised the empire. This epoch became known as the era of the Five Good Emperors, and was followed by the short-lived Severan dynasty.
During the Crisis of the 3rd century, barracks emperors succeeded one another at short intervals. Three short lived secessionist attempts had their own emperors: the Gallic Empire, the Britannic Empire, and the Palmyrene Empire though the latter used rex more regularly.
The Principate (27 BC – 284 AD) period was succeeded by what is known as the Dominate (284 AD – 527 AD), during which Emperor Diocletian tried to put the empire on a more formal footing. Diocletian sought to address the challenges of the Empire's now vast geography and the instability caused by the informality of succession by the creation of co-emperors and junior emperors. At one point, there were as many as five sharers of the imperium (see: Tetrarchy). In 325 AD Constantine I defeated his rivals and restored single emperor rule, but following his death the empire was divided among his sons. For a time the concept was of one empire ruled by multiple emperors with varying territory under their control, however following the death of Theodosius I the rule was divided between his two sons and increasingly became separate entities. The areas administered from Rome are referred to by historians the Western Roman Empire and those under the immediate authority of Constantinople called the Eastern Roman Empire or (after the Battle of Yarmouk in 636 AD) the Later Roman or Byzantine Empire. The subdivisions and co-emperor system were formally abolished by Emperor Zeno in 480 AD following the death of Julius Nepos last Western Emperor and the ascension of Odoacer as the de facto King of Italy in 476 AD.
Byzantine period
Before the 4th Crusade
Historians generally refer to the continuing Roman Empire in the east as the Byzantine Empire after Byzantium, the original name of the town that Constantine I would elevate to the Imperial capital as New Rome in AD 330. (The city is more commonly called Constantinople and is today named Istanbul). Although the empire was again subdivided and a co-emperor sent to Italy at the end of the fourth century, the office became unitary again only 95 years later at the request of the Roman Senate and following the death of Julius Nepos, last Western Emperor. This change was a recognition of the reality that little remained of Imperial authority in the areas that had been the Western Empire, with even Rome and Italy itself now ruled by the essentially autonomous Odoacer.
These Later Roman "Byzantine" emperors completed the transition from the idea of the emperor as a semi-republican official to the emperor as an absolute monarch. Of particular note was the translation of the Latin Imperator into the Greek Basileus, after Emperor Heraclius changed the official language of the empire from Latin to Greek in AD 620. Basileus, a title which had long been used for Alexander the Great was already in common usage as the Greek word for the Roman emperor, but its definition and sense was "King" in Greek, essentially equivalent with the Latin Rex. Byzantine period emperors also used the Greek word "autokrator", meaning "one who rules himself", or "monarch", which was traditionally used by Greek writers to translate the Latin dictator. Essentially, the Greek language did not incorporate the nuances of the Ancient Roman concepts that distinguished imperium from other forms of political power.
In general usage, the Byzantine imperial title evolved from simply "emperor" (basileus) to "emperor of the Romans" (basileus tōn Rōmaiōn) in the 9th century, to "emperor and autocrat of the Romans" (basileus kai autokratōr tōn Rōmaiōn) in the 10th.[4] In fact, none of these (and other) additional epithets and titles had ever been completely discarded.
One important distinction between the post Constantine I (reigned AD 306–337) emperors and their pagan predecessors was cesaropapism, the assertion that the emperor (or other head of state) is also the head of the Church. Although this principle was held by all emperors after Constantine, it met with increasing resistance and ultimately rejection by bishops in the west after the effective end of Imperial power there. This concept became a key element of the meaning of "emperor" in the Byzantine and Orthodox East, but went out of favour in the west with the rise of Roman Catholicism.
The Byzantine Empire also produced three women who effectively governed the state: the Empress Irene and the Empresses Zoe and Theodora.
Latin emperors
In 1204 Constantinople fell to the Venetians and the Franks in the Fourth Crusade. Following the sacking of the city, the conquerors declared a new "Empire of Romania", known to historians as the Latin Empire of Constantinople, installing Baldwin IX, Count of Flanders, as Emperor. However, Byzantine resistance to the new empire meant that it was in constant struggle to establish itself. Byzantine Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos succeeded in recapturing Constantinople in 1261. The Principality of Achaea, a vassal state the empire had created in Morea (Greece) intermittently continued to recognise the authority of the crusader emperors for another half century. Pretenders to the title continued among the European nobility until circa 1383.
After the 4th Crusade
With Constantinople occupied, claimants to the imperial succession styled themselves as emperor in the chief centres of resistance: The Laskarid dynasty in the Empire of Nicaea, the Komnenid dynasty in the Empire of Trebizond and the Doukid dynasty in the Despotate of Epirus. In 1248, Epirus recognised the Nicaean emperors, who subsequently recaptured Constantinople in 1261. The Trapezuntine emperor formally submitted in Constantinople in 1281,[5] but frequently flouted convention by styling themselves emperor back in Trebizond thereafter.
Europe
TemplateStyles' src attribute must not be empty.
This section needs additional citations for verification. (July 2020) |
Byzantium's close cultural and political interaction with its Balkan neighbours Bulgaria and Serbia, and with Russia (Kievan Rus', then Muscovy) led to the adoption of Byzantine imperial traditions in all of these countries.
Holy Roman Empire
The Emperor of the Romans' title was a reflection of the translatio imperii (transfer of rule) principle that regarded the Holy Roman emperors as the inheritors of the title of Emperor of the Western Roman Empire, despite the continued existence of the Roman Empire in the east, hence the problem of two emperors.
From the time of Otto the Great onward, much of the former Carolingian kingdom of Eastern Francia became the Holy Roman Empire. The prince-electors elected one of their peers as King of the Romans and King of Italy before being crowned by the Pope. The emperor could also pursue the election of his heir (usually a son) as King, who would then succeed him after his death. This junior king then bore the title of King of the Romans. Although technically already ruling, after the election he would be crowned as emperor by the pope. The last emperor to be crowned by the pope was Charles V; all emperors after him were technically emperors-elect, but were universally referred to as emperor.
The Holy Roman emperor was considered the first among those in power. He was also the first defender of Christianity. From 1452 to the end of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 (except in the years 1742 to 1745) only members of the House of Habsburg were Holy Roman emperors. Karl von Habsburg is currently the head of the House of Habsburg.[6][7][8]
Austrian Empire
The first Austrian Emperor was the last Holy Roman Emperor, Francis II. In the face of aggressions by Napoleon, Francis feared for the future of the Holy Roman Empire. He wished to maintain his and his family's Imperial status in the event that the Holy Roman Empire should be dissolved, as it indeed was in 1806 when an Austrian-led army suffered a humiliating defeat at the Battle of Austerlitz.[9] After which, the victorious Napoleon proceeded to dismantle the old Reich by severing a good portion from the empire and turning it into a separate Confederation of the Rhine. With the size of his imperial realm significantly reduced, Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor became Francis I, Emperor of Austria. The new imperial title may have sounded less prestigious than the old one, but Francis' dynasty continued to rule from Austria and a Habsburg monarch was still an emperor (Kaiser), and not just merely a king (König), in name. According to the historian Friedrich Heer, the Austrian Habsburg emperor remained an "auctoritas" of a special kind. He was "the grandson of the Caesars", he remained the patron of the Holy Church.[10]
The title lasted just a little over one century until 1918, but it was never clear what territory constituted the "Empire of Austria". When Francis took the title in 1804, the Habsburg lands as a whole were dubbed the Kaisertum Österreich. Kaisertum might literally be translated as "emperordom" (on analogy with "kingdom") or "emperor-ship"; the term denotes specifically "the territory ruled by an emperor", and is thus somewhat more general than Reich, which in 1804 carried connotations of universal rule. Austria proper (as opposed to the complex of Habsburg lands as a whole) had been part of the Archduchy of Austria since the 15th century, and most of the other territories of the Empire had their own institutions and territorial history. There were some attempts at centralisation, especially during the reign of Maria Theresa and her son Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor. These efforts were finalised in the early 19th century. When the Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen (Hungary) were given self-government in 1867, the non-Hungarian portions were called the Empire of Austria. They were officially known as the "Kingdoms and Lands Represented in the Imperial Council (Reichsrat)". The title of Emperor of Austria and the associated Empire were both abolished at the end World War I in 1918, when German Austria became a republic and the other kingdoms and lands represented in the Imperial Council established their independence or adhesion to other states.
The Kaisers of the Austrian Empire (1804–1918) were Franz I (1804–1835), Ferdinand I (1835–1848), Franz Joseph I (1848–1916) and Karl I (1916–1918). The current head of the House of Habsburg is Karl von Habsburg.[11][12]
Bulgaria
In 913, Simeon I of Bulgaria was crowned Emperor (Tsar, originally more fully Tsesar, cěsar') of his own people by the Patriarch of Constantinople and Imperial regent Nicholas Mystikos outside the Byzantine capital.[13] In its final expanded form, under the Second Bulgarian Empire the title read "Emperor and Autocrat of all Bulgarians and Greeks" (Цар и самодържец на всички българи и гърци, Car i samodăržec na vsički bălgari i gărci in the modern vernacular).[14] The Roman component in the Bulgarian imperial title indicated both rule over Greek speakers and the derivation of the imperial tradition from the Romans, however this component was never recognised by the Byzantine court.
Byzantine recognition of Simeon's imperial title was revoked by the succeeding Byzantine government. The decade 914–924 was spent in destructive warfare between Byzantium and Bulgaria over this and other matters of conflict. The Bulgarian monarch, who had further irritated his Byzantine counterpart by claiming the title "Emperor of the Romans" (basileus tōn Rōmaiōn), was eventually recognised, as "Emperor of the Bulgarians" (basileus tōn Boulgarōn) by the Byzantine Emperor Romanos I Lakapenos in 924.[15] Byzantine recognition of the imperial dignity of the Bulgarian monarch and the patriarchal dignity of the Bulgarian patriarch was again confirmed at the conclusion of permanent peace and a Bulgarian-Byzantine dynastic marriage in 927. In the meantime, the Bulgarian imperial title may have been also tacitly confirmed by the pope, as claimed in later Bulgarian diplomatic correspondence.[16] The Bulgarian imperial title "tsar" was adopted by all Bulgarian monarchs up to the fall of Bulgaria under Ottoman rule. Despite the attempt of Pope Innocent III to limit the Bulgarian monarch to the title of King (Rex), Kaloyan of Bulgaria considered himself an Emperor (Imperator) and his successor Boril of Bulgaria was specifically accused of improperly using the imperial title by his neighbour, the Latin Emperor Henry of Flanders.[17] Nevertheless, the Bulgarian imperial title was recognised by its neighbours and trading partners, including Byzantium, Hungary, Serbia, Venice, Genoa, Dubrovnik. 14th-century Bulgarian literary compositions saw the Bulgarian capital (Tarnovo) as a successor of Rome and Constantinople.[18]
After Bulgaria obtained full independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1908, its monarch, who was previously styled Knyaz, Prince, took the traditional title of Tsar, this time translated as King. Simeon Saxe-Coburg-Gotha is the former Tsar Simeon II of Bulgaria.[19]
France
The kings of the Ancien Régime and the July Monarchy used the title Empereur de France in diplomatic correspondence and treaties with the Ottoman emperor from at least 1673 onwards. The Ottomans insisted on this elevated style while refusing to recognise the Holy Roman emperors or the Russian tsars because of their rival claims of the Roman crown. In short, it was an indirect insult by the Ottomans to the HRE and the Russians. The French kings also used it for Morocco (1682) and Persia (1715).
First French Empire
The painting by David commemorating the event is equally famous: the gothic cathedral restyled style Empire, supervised by the mother of the Emperor on the balcony (a fictional addition, while she had not been present at the ceremony), the pope positioned near the altar, Napoleon proceeds to crown his then wife, Joséphine de Beauharnais as Empress.
Napoleon Bonaparte, who was already First Consul of the French Republic (Premier Consul de la République française) for life, declared himself Emperor of the French (Empereur des Français) on 18 May 1804, thus creating the French Empire (Empire Français).[20]
Napoleon relinquished the title of Emperor of the French on 6 April and again on 11 April 1814. Napoleon's infant son, Napoleon II, was recognised by the Council of Peers, as Emperor from the moment of his father's abdication, and therefore reigned (as opposed to ruled) as Emperor for fifteen days, 22 June to 7 July 1815.
Elba
Since 3 May 1814, the Sovereign Principality of Elba was created as a miniature non-hereditary monarchy under the exiled French Emperor Napoleon I. According to the Treaty of Fontainebleau (1814), Napoleon I was allowed to enjoy the imperial title for life. The islands were not restyled an empire.
On 26 February 1815, Napoleon abandoned Elba for France, reviving the French Empire for a Hundred Days; the Allies declared an end to Napoleon's sovereignty over Elba on 25 March 1815, and on 31 March 1815 Elba was ceded to the restored Grand Duchy of Tuscany by the Congress of Vienna. After his final defeat, Napoleon was treated as a general by the British authorities during his second exile to Atlantic Isle of St. Helena. His title was a matter of dispute with the governor of St. Helena, who insisted on addressing him as "General Bonaparte", despite the "historical reality that he had been an emperor" and therefore retained the title.[21][22][23]
Second French Empire
Napoleon I's nephew, Napoleon III, resurrected the title of emperor on 2 December 1852, after establishing the Second French Empire in a presidential coup, subsequently approved by a plebiscite.[24] His reign was marked by large scale public works, the development of social policy, and the extension of France's influence throughout the world. During his reign, he also set about creating the Second Mexican Empire (headed by his choice of Maximilian I of Mexico, a member of the House of Habsburg), to regain France's hold in the Americas and to achieve greatness for the 'Latin' race.[25] Napoleon III was deposed on 4 September 1870, after France's defeat in the Franco-Prussian War. The Third Republic followed and after the death of his son Napoleon (IV), in 1879 during the Zulu War, the Bonapartist movement split, and the Third Republic was to last until 1940.
The role of head of the House of Bonaparte is claimed by Jean-Christophe Napoléon and Charles Napoléon.
Iberian Peninsula
Spain
The origin of the title Imperator totius Hispaniae (Latin for Emperor of All Spain[note 1]) is murky. It was associated with the Leonese monarchy perhaps as far back as Alfonso the Great (r. 866–910). The last two kings of its Astur-Leonese dynasty were called emperors in a contemporary source.[citation needed]
King Sancho III of Navarre conquered Leon in 1034 and began using it. His son, Ferdinand I of Castile, also took the title in 1039. Ferdinand's son, Alfonso VI of León and Castile, took the title in 1077. It then passed to his son-in-law, Alfonso I of Aragon, in 1109. His stepson and Alfonso VI's grandson, Alfonso VII, was the only one who actually had an imperial coronation in 1135.
The title was not exactly hereditary but self-proclaimed by those who had, wholly or partially, united the Christian northern part of the Iberian Peninsula, often at the expense of killing rival siblings. The popes and Holy Roman emperors protested at the usage of the imperial title as a usurpation of leadership in western Christendom. After Alfonso VII's death in 1157 the title was abandoned, and the kings who used it are not commonly mentioned as having been "emperors", in Spanish or other historiography.
After the fall of the Byzantine Empire the legitimate heir to the throne, Andreas Palaiologos, willed away his claim to Ferdinand and Isabella in 1503.[26]
Portugal
After the independence and proclamation of the Empire of Brazil from the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves by Prince Regent Pedro, who became Emperor, in 1822 his father, King John VI of Portugal, briefly held the honorific style of Titular Emperor of Brazil and the treatment of His Imperial and Royal Majesty under the 1825 Treaty of Rio de Janeiro, by which Portugal recognised the independence of Brazil. The style of Titular Emperor was a life title, and became extinct upon the holder's demise. John VI held the imperial title for a few months only, from the ratification of the Treaty in November 1825 until his death in March 1826. During those months, however, as John's imperial title was purely honorific while his son, Pedro I, remained the sole monarch of the Brazilian Empire. Duarte Pio is the current head of the House of Braganza.
Great Britain
In the late 3rd century, by the end of the epoch of the barracks emperors in Rome, there were two Britannic emperors, reigning for about a decade. After the end of Roman rule in Britain, the Imperator Cunedda forged the Kingdom of Gwynedd in northern Wales, but all his successors were titled kings and princes.
England
There was no consistent title for the king of England before 1066, and monarchs chose to style themselves as they pleased. Imperial titles were used inconsistently, beginning with Athelstan in 930 and ended with the Norman conquest of England. Empress Matilda (1102–1167) is the only English monarch commonly referred to as "emperor" or "empress", but she acquired her title through her marriage to Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor.
During the rule of Henry VIII the Statute in Restraint of Appeals declared that 'this realm of England is an Empire...governed by one Supreme Head and King having the dignity and royal estate of the imperial Crown of the same'. This was in the context of the divorce of Catherine of Aragon and the English Reformation, to emphasise that England had never accepted the quasi-imperial claims of the papacy. Hence England and, by extension its modern successor state, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, is according to English law an Empire ruled by a King endowed with the imperial dignity. However, this has not led to the creation of the title of Emperor in England, nor in Great Britain, nor in the United Kingdom.
United Kingdom
In 1801, George III rejected the title of Emperor when offered. The only period when British monarchs held the title of Emperor in a dynastic succession started when the title Empress of India was created for Queen Victoria.[27] The government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, conferred the additional title upon her by an Act of Parliament, reputedly to assuage the monarch's irritation at being, as a mere Queen, notionally inferior to the emperors of Russia, Germany, and Austria. That included her own daughter (Princess Victoria, who was the wife of the reigning German Emperor). Hence, "Queen Victoria felt handicapped in the battle of protocol by not being an Empress herself".[28] The Indian Imperial designation was also formally justified as the expression of Britain succeeding the former Mughal Emperor as suzerain over hundreds of princely states. The Indian Independence Act 1947 provided for the abolition of the use of the title "Emperor of India" by the British monarch, but this was not executed by King George VI until a royal proclamation on 22 June 1948. Despite this, George VI continued as king of India until 1950 and as king of Pakistan until his death in 1952.
The last Empress of India was George VI's wife, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother.
German Empire
Under the guise of idealism giving way to realism, German nationalism rapidly shifted from its liberal and democratic character in 1848 to Prussian prime minister Otto von Bismarck's authoritarian Realpolitik. Bismarck wanted to unify the rival German states to achieve his aim of a conservative, Prussian-dominated Germany. Three wars led to military successes and helped to convince German people to do this: the Second war of Schleswig against Denmark in 1864, the Austro-Prussian War against Austria in 1866, and the Franco-Prussian War against the Second French Empire in 1870–71. During the Siege of Paris in 1871, the North German Confederation, supported by its allies from southern Germany, formed the German Empire with the proclamation of the Prussian king Wilhelm I as German Emperor in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles,[29] to the humiliation of the French, who ceased to resist only days later.
After his death he was succeeded by his son Frederick III who was only emperor for 99 days. In the same year his son Wilhelm II became the third emperor within a year. He was the last German emperor. After the empire's defeat in World War I the empire, called the German Reich, had a president as head of state instead of an emperor. The use of the word Reich was abandoned following World War II.
Russia
In 1472, the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, Sophia Palaiologina, married Ivan III, grand prince of Moscow, who began championing the idea of Russia being the successor to the Byzantine Empire. This idea was represented more emphatically in the composition the monk Filofej addressed to their son Vasili III. In 1480, after ending Muscovy's dependence on its overlords of the Great Horde, Ivan III began the usage of the titles Tsar and Autocrat (samoderzhets). His insistence on recognition as such by the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire since 1489 resulted in the granting of this recognition in 1514 by Emperor Maximilian I to Vasili III. His son Ivan IV emphatically crowned himself Tsar of Russia on 16 January 1547. The word "Tsar" derives from Latin Caesar, but this title was used in Russia as equivalent to "King"; the error occurred when medieval Russian clerics referred to the biblical Jewish kings with the same title that was used to designate Roman and Byzantine rulers — "Caesar".
On 31 October 1721, Peter I was proclaimed Emperor by the Governing Senate. The title used was Latin "Imperator", which is a westernising form equivalent to the traditional Slavic title "Tsar". He based his claim partially upon a letter discovered in 1717 written in 1514 from Maximilian I to Vasili III, in which the Holy Roman Emperor used the term in referring to Vasili.
A formal address to the ruling Russian monarch adopted thereafter was 'Your Imperial Majesty'. The crown prince was addressed as 'Your Imperial Highness'.
The title has not been used in Russia since the abdication of Emperor Nicholas II on 15 March 1917.
The Russian Empire produced four reigning Empresses, all in the eighteenth century. These were Catherine I, Anne, Elizabeth, and Catherine II.
The role of head of the House of Romanov is claimed by Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna (great-great-granddaughter of Alexander II), Prince Andrew Romanoff (great-great-grandson of Nicholas I), and Prince Karl Emich of Leiningen (great-grandson of Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich).
Serbia
In 1345, the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan proclaimed himself Emperor (Tsar) and was crowned as such at Skopje on Easter 1346 by the newly created Serbian Patriarch, and by the Patriarch of Bulgaria and the autocephalous Archbishop of Ohrid. His imperial title was recognised by the Bulgarian Empire and various other neighbours and trading partners but not by the Byzantine Empire. In its final standardised form, the Serbian imperial title read "Emperor of Serbs and Greeks" (цар Срба и Грка, car Srba i Grka in modern Serbian). It was only employed by two monarchs in Serbia, Stefan Uroš IV Dušan and his son Stefan Uroš V, becoming extinct after the latter's death in 1371. A half-brother of Dušan, Simeon Uroš, and then his son Jovan Uroš, claimed the same title, until the latter's abdication in 1373, while ruling as dynasts in Thessaly. The "Greek" component in the Serbian imperial title indicates both rule over Greek speakers and the derivation of the imperial tradition from the Romans.[30] A renegade Hungarian-Serb commander, Jovan Nenad, who claimed to be a descendant of Serbian and Byzantine rulers, styled himself Emperor.
The Americas
Pre-Columbian traditions
The Aztec and Inca traditions are unrelated to one another. Both were conquered under the reign of King Charles I of Spain who was simultaneously emperor-elect of the Holy Roman Empire during the fall of the Aztecs and fully emperor during the fall of the Incas. Incidentally by being king of Spain, he was also Roman (Byzantine) emperor in pretence through Andreas Palaiologos. The translations of their titles were provided by the Spanish.
Aztec Empire
The only pre-Columbian North American rulers to be commonly called emperors were the Huey Tlatoani of the Mexica city-states of Tenochtitlan, Tlacopan and Texcoco, which along with their allies and tributaries are popularly known as the Aztec Empire (1375–1521). Tlatoani is a generic Nahuatl word for "speaker"; however, most English translators use "king" for their translation, thus rendering huey tlatoani as great king or emperor.[31]
The Triple Alliance was an elected monarchy chosen by the elite. The emperors of Tenochtitlan and Texcoco were nominally equals, each receiving two-fifths of tribute from the vassal kingdoms, whereas the emperor of Tlacopan was a junior member and only received one-fifth of the tribute,[32] due to the fact that Tlacopan was a newcomer to the alliance. Despite the nominal equality, Tenochtitlan eventually assumed a de facto dominant role in the Empire, to the point that even the emperors of Tlacopan and Texcoco would acknowledge Tenochtitlan's effective supremacy. Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés executed Emperor Cuauhtémoc and installed puppet rulers who became vassals for Spain.
Inca Empire
The only pre-Columbian South American rulers to be commonly called emperors were the Sapa Inca of the Inca Empire (1438–1533). Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro, conquered the Inca for Spain, killed Emperor Atahualpa, and installed puppets as well. Atahualpa may actually be considered a usurper as he had achieved power by killing his half-brother and he did not perform the required coronation with the imperial crown mascaipacha by the Huillaq Uma (high priest).
Post-Columbian Americas
Brazil
When Napoleon I ordered the invasion of Portugal in 1807 because it refused to join the Continental System, the Portuguese Braganzas moved their capital to Rio de Janeiro to avoid the fate of the Spanish Bourbons (Napoleon I arrested them and made his brother Joseph king). When the French general Jean-Andoche Junot arrived in Lisbon, the Portuguese fleet had already left with all the local elite.
In 1808, under a British naval escort, the fleet arrived in Brazil. Later, in 1815, the Portuguese Prince Regent (later King as João VI) proclaimed the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves, as a union of three kingdoms, lifting Brazil from its colonial status.
After the fall of Napoleon and the Liberal Revolution in Portugal, the Portuguese royal family returned to Europe (1821). Prince Pedro of Braganza (King João's older son) stayed in South America acting as regent of the local kingdom, but, in 1822, he proclaimed himself Emperor of Brazil under the regnal name of Pedro I. He did, however, recognise his father, João VI, as Titular Emperor of Brazil —a purely honorific title—until João VI's death in 1826.
The empire came to an end in 1889, with the overthrow of Emperor Pedro II (Pedro I's son and successor), when the Brazilian republic was proclaimed.
Today the headship of the Imperial House of Brazil is disputed between two branches of the House of Orléans-Braganza: the Vassouras branch, headed by Bertrand of Orléans-Braganza, and the Petrópolis branch, headed by Pedro Carlos of Orléans-Braganza. Both Bertrand and Pedro Carlos are great-great-grandsons of Emperor Pedro II.
Haiti
Haiti was declared an empire by its ruler, Jean-Jacques Dessalines, who made himself Jacques I, on 20 May 1805. He was assassinated the next year.[33] Haiti again became an empire from 1849 to 1859 under Faustin Soulouque.
Mexico
In Mexico, the First Mexican Empire was the first of two empires created. After the declaration of independence on 15 September 1821, it was the intention of the Mexican parliament to establish a commonwealth whereby the king of Spain, Ferdinand VII, would also be Emperor of Mexico, but in which both countries were to be governed by separate laws and with their own legislative offices. Should the king refuse the position, the law provided for a member of the House of Bourbon to accede to the Mexican throne.
Ferdinand VII, however, did not recognise the independence and said that Spain would not allow any other European prince to take the throne of Mexico. By request of Parliament, the president of the regency Agustín de Iturbide was proclaimed emperor of Mexico on 12 July 1822 as Agustín I. Agustín de Iturbide was the general who helped secure Mexican independence from Spanish rule, but was overthrown by the Plan of Casa Mata.
In 1863, the invading French, under Napoleon III (see above), in alliance with Mexican conservatives and nobility, helped create the Second Mexican Empire, and invited Archduke Maximilian, of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine, younger brother of the Austrian Emperor Franz Josef I, to become emperor Maximilian I of Mexico. The childless Maximilian and his consort Empress Carlota of Mexico, daughter of Leopold I of Belgium, adopted Agustín's grandsons Agustin and Salvador as his heirs to bolster his claim to the throne of Mexico. Maximilian and Carlota made Chapultepec Castle their home, which has been the only palace in North America to house sovereigns.[citation needed] After the withdrawal of French protection in 1867, Maximilian was captured and executed by the liberal forces of Benito Juárez.[34]
This empire led to French influence in the Mexican culture and also immigration from France, Belgium, and Switzerland to Mexico. Maximilian's closest living agnatic relative is Karl von Habsburg, the head of the House of Habsburg.
Middle East
The term "king of kings" is used for the "emperor".[3] The title King of Kings takes various forms depending on the language, and was used not only in Iran but also in countries surrounding Iran.
- Šar Šarrāni,[35] the king of kings form of Šar, used in Assyria, Babylonia, etc.
- Shahanshah,[35] the king of kings form of Shah, used in Iran, etc.
- Basileus Basileōn,[35] the king of kings form of Basileus, used in Macedonia, Byzantine, etc.
- Rajadhiraja,[35] the king of kings form of Raja, used in Champa, etc.
- Maharajadhiraja,[35] the king of kings form of Maharaja, used in Gupta, Nepal, etc.
- Sulṭānü's-Selāṭīn, the king of kings form of Sultan, used in Ottoman, Delhi, etc.
- Malik al-Muluk,[36] the king of kings form of Malik, used in Palmyra, Buyid, etc.
- Ark'ayits Ark'a,[37] the king of kings form of Arka, used in Armenia.
- Mepe-Mepeta, the king of kings form of Mepe, used in Georgia.
- Nəgusä nägäst,[35] the king of kings form of Negus, used in Ethiopia.
- Khagan, "khan of khans"[38]
Iran
Persian monarchs adopted the imperial title shahanshah (Persian: “King of Kings”) to denote supremacy over subordinate kings (shah). The title was used by the rulers of the Achaemenid, Arsacid, and Sasanian dynasty, and is commonly translated as “King of Kings”. From the Safavid dynasty in the 16th century onward, the shortened form shah became the standard royal title. Iranian rulers were typically regarded in the West as emperors.
The use of shahanshah is attested from the reign of Darius I, reflecting the extensive territorial scope of the Persian Empire, which at its height extended from the Indian subcontinent to parts of Greece and Egypt.[39] Sasanian rulers further styled themselves “King of Kings of Iranians and non-Iranians” to emphasise sovereignty over both Iranian and non-Iranian lands.
The last Iranian monarch to bear the title shahanshah was Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was deposed during the Iranian Revolution in 1979.
Ottoman Empire
Ottoman rulers held many titles and appellations denoting their imperial status. These included Sultan of Sultans, Padishah, and Hakan.
The full style of the Ottoman sultan once the empire's frontiers had stabilised became:[40][41]
Sultan (given name) Khan, Sovereign of The Sublime House of Osman, Sultan us-Selatin (Sultan of Sultans), Hakan (Khan of Khans), Commander of the faithful and Successor of the Prophet of the Lord of the Universe, Custodian of the Holy Cities of Mecca, Medina and Quds (Jerusalem), Padishah (Emperor) of The Three Cities of Istanbul (Constantinople), Edirne (Adrianople) and Bursa, and of the Cities of Châm (Damascus) and Cairo (Egypt), of all Azerbaijan, of the Maghreb, of Barkah, of Kairouan, of Alep, of the Arab and Persian Iraq, of Basra, of El Hasa strip, of Raqqa, of Mosul, of Parthia, of Diyâr-ı Bekr, of Cilicia, of the provinces of Erzurum, of Sivas, of Adana, of Karaman, of Van, of Barbaria, of Habech (Abyssinia), of Tunisia, of Tripoli, of Châm (Syria), of Cyprus, of Rhodes, of Crete, of the province of Morea (Peloponnese), of Bahr-i Sefid (Mediterranean Sea), of Bahr-i Siyah (Black Sea), of Anatolia, of Rumelia (the European part of the Empire), of Bagdad, of Kurdistan, of Greece, of Turkestan, of Tartary, of Circassia, of the two regions of Kabarda, of Gorjestan (Georgia), of the steppe of Kipchaks, of the whole country of the Tatars, of Kefa (Theodosia) and of all the neighbouring regions, of Bosnia, of the City and Fort of Belgrade, of the province of Sirbistan (Serbia), with all the castles and cities, of all Arnaut, of all Eflak (Wallachia) and Bogdania (Moldavia), as well as all the dependencies and borders, and many others countries and cities.
After the Ottoman capture of Constantinople in 1453, the Ottoman sultans began to style themselves Kaysar-i Rum (Caesar of the Romans) as they asserted themselves to be the heirs to the Roman Empire by right of conquest. The title was of such importance to them that it led them to eliminate the various Byzantine successor states—and therefore rival claimants—over the next eight years. Though the term "emperor" was rarely used by Westerners for the Ottoman sultan, it was generally accepted by Westerners that he had imperial status.
Harun Osman is currently the head of the Ottoman dynasty.
Indian subcontinent
In the Vedic period, there was a federal imperial system called the Samrajya system and its emperor's title was Samrat (hi:सम्राट्).[42] Those monarchs, who could bring under subjection many rulers, claimed the title of Samrat.[43] Samrajni means empress.[44]
Another type of Indian imperialism was called the Chakravarti system.[42] Emperors wished to be called Chakravarti,[45] meaning "universal monarch."[46] Cakravartini means empress.[47]
The actual condition of Samrat, which is an objective term, and the theoretical status of Chakravarti, which is a poetical concept, were connected in point of psychology.[45]
Mauryan Empire
From 322 to 185 BC the Indian subcontinent was dominated by the Maurya dynasty of Magadha, whose monarchs used the title(s) of Chakravarti or Samrat.
Chandragupta of the Maurya Empire is referred to as the first emperor of the first unified Indian subcontinent.[48] The first references to a Chakravartin as a secular monarch appear in reference to Ashoka of the Maurya Empire.[46]
Delhi Sultanate
From 1206 to 1526 most of the Indian subcontinent was dominated by the Muslim Delhi Sultanate, whose monarchs used the title Sultan of Sultans.
Mughal Empire
From the 14th century until the 19th century the Indian subcontinent was dominated by predominantly Muslim rulers like the Mughals in the second unified Indian subcontinent,whose rulers used the title Shahenshah and Padishah (or Badshah) of Hindustan.
British Raj
When the British monarchs ruled over India, they adopted the additional title of Kaisar-i-Hind (transl. Emperor of India).
Regional emperors
- Janaka of Videha secured the position of Samrat.[42]
- Dasharatha of Kosala called himself the Samrat over all rulers of the earth.[49]
- Yashodharman is designated as Samrat in an inscription.[50]
- The Vakataka ruler Pravarasena I was titled Samrat.[51]
- The Gupta emperors were known by various titles, such as Samrat, Chakravartin, etc.[52]
- The ruler of Kalinga, Kharavela of the Mahameghavahana dynasty, used the title Kalinga-Chakravartin.[53]
- Lakshmikarna of the Kalachuri dynasty proclaimed himself Chakravartin.
- The Imperial Cholas used the titles of Chakravartigal[54] and Tribhuvana-Chakravartin ("emperor of the three worlds").[55]
- The term Chakravartin was used by the Pallavas.[56]
- The Pandyan Emperor Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan I was titled Tribhuvana-Cakravarti ("emperor of the three worlds").[57]
- Dharasena IV, the Maitraka ruler of Valabhi, called himself Chakravartin.[58]
- Veera Ballala II of the Hoysala Kingdom assumed the title Hoysala-Chakravartin.[59]
Africa
Ethiopia
TemplateStyles' src attribute must not be empty.
This section needs additional citations for verification. (February 2012) |
From 1270 the Solomonic dynasty of Ethiopia used the title Template:Transliteration, literally "King of Kings". The use of the king of kings style began a millennium earlier in this region, however, with the title being used by the kings of Aksum, beginning with Sembrouthes in the 3rd century.
Another title used by this dynasty was Template:Transliteration. Template:Transliteration translates as Empress, and was used by the only reigning empress, Zewditu, along with the official title Template:Transliteration ("Queen of Kings").
In 1936, the Italian king Victor Emmanuel III claimed the title of emperor after Ethiopia was occupied by Italy during the Second Italo-Abyssinian War. After the defeat of the Italians by the British and the Ethiopians in 1941, Haile Selassie was restored to the throne but Victor Emmanuel did not relinquish his claim until 1943, even though he had no standing to the title.[60]
The current head of the Solomonic dynasty is Zera Yacob Amha Selassie.
Central African Empire
In 1976, President Jean-Bédel Bokassa of the Central African Republic, proclaimed the country to be an autocratic Central African Empire, and made himself Emperor as Bokassa I. The expenses of his coronation ceremony actually bankrupted the country. He was overthrown three years later and the republic was restored.[61]
East Asia
TemplateStyles' src attribute must not be empty.
This section needs additional citations for verification. (June 2015) |
皇帝 is the title of emperors in East Asia. An emperor is called Huángdì in Chinese, Hwangje in Korean, Hoàng đế in Vietnamese, and Kōtei in Japanese, but these are all just their respective pronunciations of the Chinese character 皇帝. Other imperial titles such as Tennō (天皇), Mikado (帝), and Seonghwang (성황; 聖皇) are merely variations of the Chinese character 皇帝.[note 3]
The rulers of China and (once Westerners became aware of the role) Japan were always accepted in the West as emperors, and referred to as such. The claims of other East Asian monarchies to the title may have been accepted for diplomatic purposes, but it was not necessarily used in more general contexts.
China
The East Asian tradition is different from the Roman tradition, having arisen separately. What links them together is the use of the Chinese logographs 皇 (huáng) and 帝 (dì) which together or individually are imperial. Because of the cultural influence of China, China's neighbours adopted these titles or had their native titles conform in hanzi. Anyone who spoke to the emperor was to address the emperor as bìxià (陛下, lit. the "Bottom of the Steps"), corresponding to the Imperial Majesty"; shèngshàng (聖上, lit. Holy Highness); or wànsuì (万岁, lit. "You, of Ten Thousand Years").
In 221 BC, Ying Zheng, who was king of Qin at the time, proclaimed himself Shi Huangdi (始皇帝), which translates as "first emperor". Huangdi is composed of huang ("august one", 皇) and di ("sage-king", 帝), and referred to legendary/mythological sage-emperors living several millennia earlier, of which three were huang and five were di. Thus Ying Zheng became Qin Shi Huang, abolishing the system where the huang/di titles were reserved to dead and/or mythological rulers. Since then, the title "king" became a lower ranked title, and later divided into two grades. Although not as popular, the title 王 wang (king or prince) was still used by many monarchs and dynasties in China up to the Taipings in the 19th century. 王 is pronounced vương in Vietnamese, ō in Japanese, and wang in Korean.
The imperial title continued in China until the Qing dynasty was overthrown in 1912. The title was briefly revived from 12 December 1915 to 22 March 1916 by President Yuan Shikai and again in early July 1917 when General Zhang Xun attempted to restore last Qing emperor Puyi to the throne. Puyi retained the title and attributes of a foreign emperor, as a personal status, until 1924. After the Japanese occupied Manchuria in 1931, they proclaimed it to be the Empire of Manchukuo, and Puyi became emperor of Manchukuo. This empire ceased to exist when it was occupied by the Soviet Red Army in 1945.[62]
In general, an emperor would have one empress (Huanghou, 皇后) at one time, although posthumous entitlement to empress for a concubine was not uncommon. The earliest known usage of huanghou was in the Han dynasty. The emperor would generally select the empress from his concubines. In subsequent dynasties, when the distinction between wife and concubine became more accentuated, the crown prince would have chosen an empress-designate before his reign. Imperial China produced only one reigning empress, Wu Zetian, and she used the same Chinese title as an emperor (Huangdi, 皇帝). Wu Zetian then reigned for about 15 years (AD 690–705).
Under the tributary system of China, monarchs of Korea and Vietnam sometimes called themselves emperor in their country. They introduced themselves as king for China and other countries (Emperor at home, king abroad). In Japan, Ashikaga Yoshimitsu a shogun was granted title of King of Japan for trade by the Ming emperor. However, the Shogun was a subject of the Japanese emperor. It was contrary to rules of tributary system, but the Ming emperor connived it for the purpose of suppressing the Wokou.
Japan
The earliest emperor recorded in Kojiki and Nihon Shoki is Emperor Jimmu, who is said to be a descendant of Amaterasu's grandson Ninigi who descended from Heaven (Tenson kōrin). If one believes what is written in Nihon Shoki, the emperors have an unbroken direct male lineage that goes back more than 2,600 years. In ancient Japan, the earliest titles for the sovereign were either ヤマト大王/大君 (yamato ōkimi, Grand King of Yamato), 倭王/倭国王 (waō/wakokuō, King of Wa, used externally), or 治天下大王 (amenoshita shiroshimesu ōkimi, Grand King who rules all under heaven, used internally).
In 607, Empress Suiko sent a diplomatic document to China, which she wrote "the emperor of the land of the rising sun (日出處天子) sends a document to the emperor of the land of the setting sun (日沒處天子)" and began to use the title emperor externally.[63] As early as the 7th century, the word 天皇 (which can be read either as sumera no mikoto, divine order, or as tennō, Heavenly Emperor, the latter being derived from a Tang Chinese term referring to the Pole star around which all other stars revolve) began to be used. The earliest use of this term is found on a wooden slat, or mokkan, unearthed in Asuka-mura, Nara Prefecture in 1998. The slat dated back to the reign of Emperor Tenmu and Empress Jitō.[64] The reading 'Tennō' has become the standard title for the Japanese sovereign up to the present age. The term 帝 (mikado, Emperor) is also found in literary sources.
In the Japanese language, the word tennō is restricted to Japan's own monarch; kōtei (皇帝) is usually used for foreign emperors. Historically, retired emperors often kept power over a child-emperor as de facto regent. For a long time, a shōgun (military aristocratic class) or an imperial regent wielded actual political power.[65] In fact, through much of Japanese history, the emperor has been little more than a figurehead. The Meiji Restoration restored practical abilities and the political system under Emperor Meiji.[66] The last shogun Tokugawa Yoshinobu resigned in 1868.
After World War II, all claims of divinity were dropped (see Ningen-sengen). The Diet acquired all prerogative powers of the Crown, reverting the latter to a ceremonial role.[67] By 1979, after the short-lived Central African Empire (1976–1979), Emperor Shōwa was the only monarch in the world with the title emperor.[failed verification]
As of the early 21st century, Japan's succession law prohibits a female from ascending the throne. With the birth of a daughter as the first child of the then-Crown Prince Naruhito, Japan considered abandoning that rule. However, shortly after the announcement that Princess Kiko was pregnant with her third child, the proposal to alter the Imperial Household Law was suspended by then-Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. On 3 January 2007, as the child turned out to be a son, Prime Minister Shinzō Abe announced that he would drop the proposal.[68]
Emperor Naruhito is the 126th monarch according to Japan's traditional order of succession. The second and third in line of succession are Fumihito, Prince Akishino and Prince Hisahito. Historically, Japan has had eight reigning empresses who used the genderless title Tennō, rather than the female consort title kōgō (皇后) or chūgū (中宮). There is ongoing discussion of the Japanese Imperial succession controversy. Although current Japanese law prohibits female succession, all Japanese emperors claim to trace their lineage to Amaterasu, the Sun Goddess of the Shintō religion. Thus, the emperor is thought to be the highest authority of the Shinto religion, and one of his duties is to perform Shinto rituals for the people of Japan.
Korea
Some rulers of Goguryeo (37 BC–AD 668) used the title of Taewang (태왕; 太王), literally translated as "Greatest King". The title of Taewang was also used by some rulers of Silla (57 BC–AD 935), including Beopheung and Jinheung.
The rulers of Balhae (698–926) internally called themselves Seongwang (성왕; 聖王; lit. "Holy King").[69]
The rulers of Goryeo (918–1392) used the titles of emperor and Son of Heaven of the East of the Ocean (해동천자; 海東天子). Goryeo's imperial system ended in 1270 with capitulation to the Mongol Empire.[70]
In 1897, Gojong, the king of Joseon, proclaimed the founding of the Korean Empire (1897–1910), becoming the emperor of Korea. He declared the era name of "Gwangmu" (광무; 光武), meaning "Bright and Martial". The Korean Empire lasted until 1910, when it was annexed by the Empire of Japan.
Mongolia
The Book of Wei, a Chinese history book, records that the title Khagan (可汗) and the title Huángdì (皇帝) are the same.[72] In the 13th century, Giovanni da Pian del Carpine called the Mongol great khan simply imperator.[3]
The title Khagan (khan of khans or grand khan) was held by Genghis Khan, founder of the Mongol Empire in 1206; he also formally took the Chinese title huangdi, as "Genghis Emperor" (成吉思皇帝; Chéngjísī Huángdì ). Only the Khagans from Genghis Khan to the fall of the Yuan dynasty in 1368 are normally referred to as emperors in English.
Vietnam
Đại Việt Kingdom (40–43, 544–602, 938–1407, 1427–1945) (The first ruler of Vietnam to take the title of Emperor (Hoàng Đế) was the founder of the Early Lý dynasty, Lý Nam Đế, in the year AD 544)
Ngô Quyền, the first ruler of Đại Việt as an independent state, used the title Vương (王, King). However, after the death of Ngô Quyền, the country immersed in a civil war known as Anarchy of the 12 Warlords that lasted for over 20 years. In the end, Đinh Bộ Lĩnh unified the country after defeating all the warlords and became the first ruler of Đại Việt to use the title Hoàng Đế (皇帝, Emperor) in 968. Succeeding rulers in Vietnam then continued to use this Emperor title until 1806 when this title was stopped being used for a century.[73]
Đinh Bộ Lĩnh was not the first to claim the title of Hoàng Đế (皇帝, Emperor). Before him, Lý Bí and Mai Thúc Loan also claimed this title. However, their rules were short-lived.[citation needed]
The Vietnamese emperors also gave this title to their ancestors who were lords or influential figures in the previous dynasty, as did the Chinese emperors. This practice was one of the many indications that Vietnam considered itself an equal to China which remained intact up to the twentieth century.[74]
In 1802 the newly established Nguyễn dynasty requested canonisation from the Chinese Jiaqing Emperor and received the title Quốc Vương (國王, King of a State) and the name of the country as Việt Nam (越南) instead Đại Việt (大越). To avoid unnecessary armed conflicts, the Vietnamese rulers accepted this in diplomatic relation and used the title Emperor only domestically. However, Vietnamese rulers never accepted the vassalage relationship with China and always refused to come to Chinese courts to pay homage to Chinese rulers (a sign of vassalage acceptance). China waged a number of wars against Vietnam throughout history, and after each failure, settled for the tributary relationship. The Yuan dynasty under Kublai Khan waged three wars against Vietnam to force it into a vassalage relationship but after successive failures, Kublai Khan's successor, Temür Khan, finally settled for a tributary relationship with Vietnam. Vietnam sent tributary missions to China once in three years (with some periods of disruptions) until the 19th century, Sino-French War France replaced China in control of northern Vietnam.[75]
The emperors of the last dynasty of Vietnam continued to hold this title until the French conquered Vietnam. The emperor, however, was then a puppet figure only and could easily be disposed of by the French for more pro-France figure. Japan took Vietnam from France and the Axis-occupied Vietnam was declared an empire by the Japanese in March 1945. The line of emperors came to an end with Bảo Đại, who was deposed after the war, although he later served as head of state of South Vietnam from 1949 to 1955.[76]
Religion
Christianity
Popes bear the title Pontifex maximus, which was one of the titles of the Roman emperors, so Guglielmo Ferrero said that the Pope is a direct successor to the Roman Emperor.[77]
In East Asia, China, Japan, and South Korea, the title Pope is translated as 教皇, literally "emperor of the religion".[78][79][80]
Islam
In the Islamosphere, Khalifa appears as the equivalent of emperor. During the Crusades, Abbasid khalifa came to be referred to as the "emperor".[3]
Buddhism and Hinduism
Some Buddhist or Hindu monarchs of East and Southeast Asia called Chakravarti were:
- The Wheel-Turning King (Chakravarti) was used by some Chinese monarchs, such as Emperor Wu of Liang,[81] etc.
- The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel was used by some Chinese monarchs, such as Empress Wu Zetian,[82] etc.
- The title Emperor Manjushri, related to the wheel-turning king (Chakravarti), was given to the Chinese Qing emperors in Tibetan Buddhism
- The Wheel-Turning King (Chakravarti) was used by some Mongolian monarchs, such as Altan Khan,[83] etc.
- The Wheel-Turning Sacred King (Chakravarti) was used by some Korean monarchs, such as Jinheung of Silla,[84] Seong of Baekje,[85] etc.
- The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel was used by some Korean monarchs, such as Mun of Balhae,[86] the Goryeo monarchs,[87] etc.
- The Cakravartin of the Golden Wheel (金輪聖王) was used by some Japanese monarchs, such as Emperor Go-Daigo,[88] etc.
- The Chakkraphat (Chakravarti) was used by some Siamese monarchs, such as Maha Chakkraphat,[89] etc.
- The Cakkavatti (Chakravarti) was used by some Burmese monarchs, such as Bayinnaung,[90] etc.
- The Chakkaphat (Chakravarti) was used by some Lao monarchs, such as Chakkaphat Phaen Phaeo,[91] etc.
- The Chakravartin was used by some Khmer monarchs, such as Jayavarman II,[92] etc.
- The Chakravartin was used by some Javanese monarchs, such as Airlangga,[93] etc.
- The Nyakrawati (Chakravarti) was used by some Javanese monarchs, such as Hanyakrawati, etc.
See also
Notes
- ↑ Before the emergence of the modern country of Spain (beginning with the union of Castile and Aragon in 1492), the Latin word Hispania, in any of the Iberian Romance languages, either in singular or plural forms (in English: Spain or Spains), was used to refer to the whole of the Iberian Peninsula, and not exclusively, as in modern usage, to the country of Spain, thus excluding Portugal.
- ↑ Agostino never saw the Sultan, but probably did see and sketch the helmet in Venice.
- ↑ 天皇 (tennō) is a combination of 天 (ten), meaning "heavenly", and 皇, an abbreviation of 皇帝 (kōtei). 帝 (mikado) is an abbreviation of 皇帝 (kōtei). 성황 or 聖皇 (seonghwang) is a combination of 聖 (seong), meaning "holy", and 皇, an abbreviation of 皇帝 (hwangje).
References
- ↑ Template:OEtymD
- ↑ Peng, Ying-chen. "The Forbidden City". Khan Academy.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Malinowski, Gościwit (2022). "Imperator-Huangdi: The Idea of the Highest Universal Divine Ruler in the West and China". In Balbo, Andrea; Ahn, Jaewon; Kim, Kihoon (eds.). Empire and Politics in the Eastern and Western Civilisations. De Gruyter. pp. 16–19. doi:10.1515/9783110731590-002. ISBN 978-3-11-073159-0.
- ↑ George Ostrogorsky, "Avtokrator i samodržac", Glas Srpske kraljevske akadamije CLXIV, Drugi razdred 84 (1935), 95–187.
- ↑ Nicol, Donald MacGillivray, The Last Centuries of Byzantium, second edition (Cambridge: University Press, 1993), p. 74.
- ↑ Heer, Friedrich. Holy Roman Empire (2002); Lonnie Johnson "Central Europe: Enemies, Neighbors, Friends" (2011), p. 81.
- ↑ "The Holy Roman Empire".
- ↑ "Heiliges Römisches Reich : Geschichte der staatlichen Emanzipation". 27 August 2006.
- ↑ liamfoley63 (6 August 2020). "August 6, 1806. Dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire". European Royal History. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ Friedrich Heer "Der Kampf um die österreichische Identität" (1981), p. 259.
- ↑ Lonnie Johnson "Central Europe: Enemies, Neighbors, Friends" (2011), p. 118.
- ↑ Anatol Murad "Franz Joseph I of Austria and his Empire." (1968) p. 1.
- ↑ Mladjov 2015: 171–177.
- ↑ Charters of Ivan Alexander and Ivan Shishman, in Petkov 2008: 500, 506–507.
- ↑ Mladjov 2015: 177–178.
- ↑ Mladjov 1999.
- ↑ Prinzing 1973: 420–421.
- ↑ Kaimakamova 2006.
- ↑ "Bulgaria's Former King and PM Simeon II Celebrates his 80th Birthday".
- ↑ "Napoleon and War in 1804–05". www.fsmitha.com. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ Napoleon, Vincent Cronin, p419, HarperCollins, 1994.
- ↑ Napoleon, Frank McLynn, p644, Pimlico 1998.
- ↑ Le Mémorial de Sainte Hélène, Emmanuel De Las Cases, Tome III, page101, published by Jean De Bonnot, Libraire à l'enseigne du canon, 1969.
- ↑ "The Second French Empire (1852–1870)". About History. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ Appelbaum, Nancy P.; Macpherson, Anne S.; Rosemblatt, Karin Alejandra (2003). Race and nation in modern Latin America. UNC Press Books. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-8078-5441-9.
- ↑ Nicol, Donald MacGillivray (1992). The immortal emperor : the life and legend of Constantine Palaiologos, last emperor of the Romans. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-41456-2.
- ↑ liamfoley63 (12 November 2019). "History of Styles and Titles Part IV: Emperor of Britain". European Royal History. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ Longford, Elizabeth (1972). Queen Victoria: Born to Succeed. p. 404. ISBN 9780515028683. Retrieved 18 August 2020.
- ↑ "Treaty of Frankfurt am Main ends Franco-Prussian War". HISTORY. 5 November 2009. Archived from the original on 1 April 2015. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ Fine 1987: 309–310.
- ↑ Lockhart (2001, p.238); Schroeder (2007, p. 3). See also the entry for "TLAHTOANI" Archived 2007-06-14 at the Wayback Machine, in Wimmer (2006).
- ↑ Nielsen, Hjørdis (1996). "THE 2:2:1 TRIBUTE DISTRIBUTION IN THE TRIPLE ALLIANCE: Analyzing the Tetzcocan manuscripts". Ancient Mesoamerica. 7 (2): 207–214. doi:10.1017/S0956536100001413. ISSN 0956-5361. JSTOR 26307167.
- ↑ "Jean-Jacques Dessalines". Biography. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ "Mexican Historical Figures: Maximilian I". WeExpats. 24 July 2019. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 35.3 35.4 35.5 Malinowski, Gościwit (2022). "Imperator-Huangdi: The Idea of the Highest Universal Divine Ruler in the West and China". In Balbo, Andrea; Ahn, Jaewon; Kim, Kihoon (eds.). Empire and Politics in the Eastern and Western Civilisations. De Gruyter. pp. 7–8. doi:10.1515/9783110731590-002. ISBN 978-3-11-073159-0.
- ↑ Savant, Sarah Bowen (30 September 2013). The New Muslims of Post-Conquest Iran: Tradition, Memory, and Conversion. Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-1-107-29231-4.
- ↑ Dédéyan, Gérard (2003). Les Arméniens entre Grecs, Musulmans et Croisés: étude sur les pouvoirs arméniens dans le Proche-Orient méditerranéen (1068-1150) (in French). Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. p. 531.
- ↑ Alden's Manifold Cyclopedia of Knowledge and Language. 21. J. B. Alden. 1890. p. 203.
- ↑ "Darius I". World History Encyclopedia. 10 April 2017. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ "TheOttomans.org – The Ottomans History". theottomans.org. Retrieved 14 April 2022.
- ↑ "Turkish And Ottoman Nobility And Royalty - Nobility Titles – Genuine Titles Of Nobility For Sale". Nobility Titles. 10 January 2018. Retrieved 14 April 2022.
- ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 Mahajan V.D. Ancient India. S. Chand Publishing. p. 166. ISBN 978-93-5253-132-5.
- ↑ Luniya, Bhanwarlal Nathuram (1978). Life and Culture in Ancient India: From the Earliest Times to 1000 A.D. Lakshmi Narain Agarwal. p. 130.
- ↑ Bhagwat Saran Upadhya (1941). Women in Rigveda. Nand Kishore & Bros. p. 129.
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 Derrett, J. Duncan M. (11 December 2023) [1976]. "Hindu empires". Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law: Volume One: Dharmasastra and Related Ideas. BRILL. p. 2. ISBN 978-90-04-64389-5.
- ↑ 46.0 46.1 Chakravartin in the Encyclopædia Britannica
- ↑ Learner's Multilingual Dictionary: English-English-Kannada/Malayalam/Tamil/Telugu. Pearson. 2012. p. 162. ISBN 978-81-317-1873-5.
- ↑ Chandragupta in the Encyclopædia Britannica
- ↑ Guruge, Ananda W. P. (1991). The Society of the Ramayana. Abhinav Publications. p. 52. ISBN 978-81-7017-265-9.
- ↑ Dikshitar, V. R. Ramachandra (1993) [1952]. The Gupta Polity. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. p. 10. ISBN 978-81-208-1024-2.
- ↑ Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century. Pearson Education India. p. 482. ISBN 978-81-317-1677-9.
Pravarasena I was the only Vakataka king with the imperial title samrat; the others had the relatively modest title maharaja.
- ↑ Mahajan, V. D. "India during the Gupta Age". Ancient India (14 ed.). S. Chand Publishing. p. 407. ISBN 978-93-5283-603-1.
- ↑ Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (1951). The History and Culture of the Indian People: The age of imperial unity. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. p. 213.
- ↑ Thapar, Romila (2004). Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300. University of California Press. p. 366. ISBN 978-0-520-24225-8.
The unobtrusive titles used by the early Chola kings were replaced with high-sounding ones, such as chakravartigal (emperor, the equivalent of the northern chakravartin).
- ↑ Eraly, Abraham (2011). The First Spring: The Golden Age of India. Penguin Books India. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-670-08478-4.
- ↑ Menon, Indira (2013). Rhythms in Stone: The Temples of South India. Ambi Knowledge Resource. p. 14. ISBN 978-81-903591-3-9.
- ↑ Leão, David Pierdominici (27 January 2025). Breaking the Crown of Indra: The Pāṇḍyas and Their Dynastic Identity in the South Indian Context. BRILL. p. 165. ISBN 978-90-04-72150-0.
- ↑ Mahajan V.D. Ancient India. S. Chand Publishing. p. 449. ISBN 978-93-5253-132-5.
- ↑ Aiyangar, Sakkottai Krishnaswami (2004). Ancient India: Collected Essays on the Literary and Political History of Southern India. Asian Educational Services. p. 252. ISBN 978-81-206-1850-3.
- ↑ Vadala, Alexander Attilio (1 January 2011). "Elite Distinction and Regime Change: The Ethiopian Case". Comparative Sociology. 10 (4): 636–653. doi:10.1163/156913311X590664. ISSN 1569-1330.
- ↑ Lentz, Harris M (1 January 1994). Heads of states and governments: a worldwide encyclopedia of over 2,300 leaders, 1945 through 1992. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland. ISBN 0899509266.
- ↑ "Manchukuo | puppet state created by Japan in China [1932]". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
- ↑ Satoshi Yabuuchi, 時代背景から知る 仏像の秘密, The Nikkei, 10 October 2019.
- ↑ Masataka Kondo, ご存知ですか 3月2日は飛鳥池遺跡で「天皇」木簡が出土したと発表された日です, 2 March 2018.
- ↑ Spafford, David (2014). "Emperor and Shogun, Pope and King: The Development of Japan's Warrior Aristocracy". Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts. 88 (1–4): 10–19. doi:10.1086/DIA43493624.
- ↑ Henry Kissinger on China. 2011, p. 79.
- ↑ Although the Emperor of Japan is classified as constitutional monarch among political scientists, the current constitution of Japan defines him only as 'a symbol of the nation' and no subsequent legislation states his status as the Head of state or equates the Crown synonymously with any government establishment.
- ↑ "Japan Imperial Succession".[dead link]
- ↑ New Book of Tang, vol. 209
- ↑ Em, Henry (2013). The Great Enterprise: Sovereignty and Historiography in Modern Korea. Duke University Press. pp. 24–26. ISBN 978-0822353720. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ↑ Weatherford, Jack (25 October 2016). Genghis Khan and the Quest for God: How the World's Greatest Conqueror Gave Us Religious Freedom. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-7352-2116-1.
- ↑ Book of Wei, vol. 103; "「丘豆伐」猶魏言駕馭開張也,「可汗」猶魏言皇帝也。"
- ↑ Dutton, George (2016). "From civil war to uncivil peace: The Vietnamese army and the early Nguyễn state (1802–1841)". South East Asia Research. 24 (2): 167–184. doi:10.1177/0967828X16649042. ISSN 0967-828X. JSTOR 26596471. S2CID 148779423.
- ↑ Tuyet Nhung Tran, Anthony J. S. Reid (2006), Việt Nam Borderless Histories, Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, p. 67, ISBN 978-0-299-21770-9
- ↑ Hurst, Ryan (20 May 2009). "Nigerian Civil War (1967–1970) •". Retrieved 8 June 2023.
- ↑ "Vietnam: A Television History; America's Mandarin (1954–1963); Interview with Ngo Dinh Luyen". openvault.wgbh.org. 31 January 1979. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
- ↑ Ferrero, Guglielmo (1911). "Pontifex Maximus". The Atlantic. ISSN 2151-9463. Retrieved 2 April 2025.
- ↑ "[깨알지식 Q] 아버지 뜻하는 '포프', 왜 교황이라 부를까". 조선일보. 4 March 2025. Retrieved 1 April 2025.
- ↑ "教皇フランシスコ、今夕来日 呼称を「法王」から「教皇」へと政府が変更し、一般メディアも追随". クリスチャンプレス. 23 November 2019. Retrieved 1 April 2025.
- ↑ "罗马教皇祝贺中国新年:中国一直是伟大的国家". 人民网. 3 February 2016. Retrieved 1 April 2025.
- ↑ Ferguson, Andy (11 June 2013). Tracking Bodhidharma: A Journey to the Heart of Chinese Culture. Catapult. p. 183. ISBN 978-1-61902-159-4.
- ↑ Rothschild, N. Harry (16 June 2015). Emperor Wu Zhao and Her Pantheon of Devis, Divinities, and Dynastic Mothers. Columbia University Press. p. 200. ISBN 978-0-231-53918-0.
- ↑ Perdue, Peter C. (30 June 2009). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Harvard University Press. p. 487. ISBN 978-0-674-04202-5.
- ↑ "진흥왕(眞興王)". Encyclopedia of Korean Culture (in Korean). Retrieved 13 April 2025.
- ↑ 소, 현숙 (2019). "聖王의 大通寺 創建과 梁 武帝" [The Construction of Daetongsa Temple by King Seong of Baekje and the Emperor Wu of Liang Dynasty]. 백제문화 (in Korean). Retrieved 14 May 2026.
- ↑ "문왕(文王)". Encyclopedia of Korean Culture (in Korean). Retrieved 3 June 2025.
- ↑ 박, 윤진 (2023). "고려시대 국왕의 전륜성왕 지칭과 불교적 신성화" [The Title “Cakravartin” of Kings in the Goryeo Dynasty and Their Buddhistic Deification]. 한국중세사연구 (in Korean). Retrieved 14 May 2026.
- ↑ Conlan, Thomas (10 November 2011). From Sovereign to Symbol: An Age of Ritual Determinism in Fourteenth Century Japan. Oxford University Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-19-977810-2.
- ↑ Ishii, Yoneo (1993). "Religious Patterns and Economic Change in Siam in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries". In Reid, Anthony (ed.). Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power, and Belief. Cornell University Press. p. 187. ISBN 978-0-8014-8093-5.
- ↑ Reid, Anthony (3 March 2015). A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 100. ISBN 978-1-118-51295-1.
- ↑ Holt, John Clifford (31 March 2017). Theravada Traditions: Buddhist Ritual Cultures in Contemporary Southeast Asia and Sri Lanka. University of Hawaii Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-8248-7245-8.
- ↑ Coedès, George (1968). Vella, Walter F. (ed.). The Indianised States of Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-8248-0368-1.
- ↑ Hall, Kenneth R. (28 December 2010). A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100–1500. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC. pp. 148–149. ISBN 978-0-7425-6762-7.
Further reading
- Template:Cite EB9
- Fine, J. V. A. Jr., The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest, Ann Arbor, 1987.
- Kaimakamova, M., "Turnovo – New Constantinople: The Third Rome in the Fourteench-Century Bulgarian Translation of Constantine Manasses' Synopsis Chronike," The Medieval Chronicle 4 (2006) 91–104. online
- Mladjov, I. S. R., "Between Byzantium and Rome: Bulgaria in the aftermath of the Photian Schism," Byzantine Studies/Études Byzantines 4 (n.s.) (1999) 173–181. online
- Mladjov, I. S. R., "The Crown and the Veil: Titles, Spiritual Kinship, and Diplomacy in Tenth-Century Bulgaro-Byzantine Relations," History Compass 13 (2015) 171–183. online
- Petkov, K., The Voices of Medieval Bulgaria, Seventh-Fifteenth Century, Leiden, 2008.
- Prinzing, G., "Der Brief Kaiser Heinrichs von Konstantinopel vom 13. Januar 1212," Byzantion 43 (1973) 395–431. online
External links
| File:Commons-logo.svg | Wikimedia Commons has media related to Emperors. |
- CS1 French-language sources (fr)
- Articles with dead external links from May 2026
- CS1 Korean-language sources (ko)
- Wikipedia introduction cleanup from February 2026
- Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from February 2026
- All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify
- Use dmy dates from November 2020
- Use British English from February 2026
- Articles containing Latin-language text
- Articles needing additional references from July 2020
- Articles with unsourced statements from September 2015
- Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text
- Articles with unsourced statements from November 2020
- Articles containing Turkish-language text
- Articles containing Ottoman Turkish (1500-1928)-language text
- Articles needing additional references from February 2012
- Articles needing additional references from June 2015
- Articles containing Japanese-language text
- Articles with failed verification from February 2023
- Articles containing Korean-language text
- Articles containing Chinese-language text
- Articles with unsourced statements from April 2020
- Emperors
- Heads of state
- Political philosophy
- Imperial titles
- Gendered occupations