Fundamental group: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Group structure: equivalence class clarification |
imported>1234qwer1234qwer4 m link author: Michèle Raynaud (via WP:JWB) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[File:Double_torus_illustration.png|thumb]] | [[File:Double_torus_illustration.png|thumb]] | ||
Throughout this article, | Throughout this article, <math>X</math> is a topological space. A typical example is a surface such as the one depicted at the right. Moreover, <math>x_0</math> is a point in <math>X</math> called the ''base-point''. (As is explained below, its role is rather auxiliary.) The idea of the definition of the homotopy group is to measure how many (broadly speaking) curves on <math>X</math> can be deformed into each other. The precise definition depends on the notion of the homotopy of loops, which is explained first. | ||
===Homotopy of loops=== | ===Homotopy of loops=== | ||
Given a topological space | Given a topological space <math>X</math>, a ''[[Loop (topology)|loop]] based at <math>x_0</math>'' is defined to be a [[continuous function (topology)|continuous function]] (also known as a continuous map) | ||
:<math>\gamma \colon [0, 1] \to X</math> | :<math>\gamma \colon [0, 1] \to X</math> | ||
such that the starting point <math>\gamma(0)</math> and the end point <math>\gamma(1)</math> are both equal to <math>x_0</math>. | such that the starting point <math>\gamma(0)</math> and the end point <math>\gamma(1)</math> are both equal to <math>x_0</math>. | ||
[[File:Homotopy_of_pointed_circle_maps.png|Homotopy of loops|thumb]] | [[File:Homotopy_of_pointed_circle_maps.png|Homotopy of loops. Black loops are interpolation loops at time <math>t</math>.|thumb]] | ||
A ''[[homotopy]]'' is a continuous interpolation between two loops. More precisely, a homotopy between two loops <math>\gamma, \gamma' \colon [0, 1] \to X</math> (based at the same point <math>x_0</math>) is a continuous map | A ''[[homotopy]]'' is a continuous interpolation between two loops. More precisely, a homotopy between two loops <math>\gamma, \gamma' \colon [0, 1] \to X</math> (based at the same point <math>x_0</math>) is a continuous map | ||
<math display=block>h \colon [0, 1] \times [0, 1] \to X,</math> | |||
such that | such that | ||
* <math>h(0, t) = x_0</math> for all <math>t \in [0, 1] | * <math>h(0, t) = x_0</math> for all <math>t \in [0, 1]</math>, that is, the starting point of the homotopy is <math>x_0</math> for all <math>t</math> (which is often thought of as a time parameter). | ||
* <math>h(1, t) = x_0</math> for all <math>t \in [0, 1] | * <math>h(1, t) = x_0</math> for all <math>t \in [0, 1]</math>, that is, similarly the end point stays at <math>x_0</math> for all <math>t</math>. | ||
* <math>h(r, 0) = \gamma(r), | * <math>h(r, 0) = \gamma(r)</math>, <math>h(r, 1) = \gamma'(r)</math> for all <math>r \in [0, 1]</math>. | ||
If such a homotopy | If such a homotopy <math>h</math> exists, <math>\gamma</math> and <math>\gamma'</math> are said to be ''homotopic''. The relation "<math>\gamma</math> is homotopic to <math>\gamma'</math>" is an [[equivalence relation]] so that the set of equivalence classes can be considered: | ||
<math display=block>\pi_1(X, x_0) := \{ \text{all loops }\gamma \text{ based at }x_0 \} / \text{homotopy}. </math> | |||
This set (with the group structure described below) is called the ''fundamental group'' of the topological space | This set (with the group structure described below) is called the ''fundamental group'' of the topological space <math>X</math> at the base point <math>x_0</math>. The purpose of considering the equivalence classes of loops [[up to]] homotopy, as opposed to the set of all loops (the so-called [[loop space]] of <math>X</math>) is that the latter, while being useful for various purposes, is a rather big and unwieldy object. By contrast the above [[quotient set|quotient]] is, in many cases, more manageable and computable. | ||
===Group structure=== | ===Group structure=== | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Thus the loop <math>\gamma_0 \cdot \gamma_1</math> first follows the loop <math>\gamma_0</math> with "twice the speed" and then follows <math>\gamma_1</math> with "twice the speed". | Thus the loop <math>\gamma_0 \cdot \gamma_1</math> first follows the loop <math>\gamma_0</math> with "twice the speed" and then follows <math>\gamma_1</math> with "twice the speed". | ||
The product of two homotopy classes of loops <math>[\gamma_0]</math> and <math>[\gamma_1]</math> is then defined as <math>[\gamma_0 \cdot \gamma_1]</math>. It can be shown that this product does not depend on the choice of representatives and therefore gives a [[Equivalence relation#Well-definedness under an equivalence relation|well-defined]] operation on the set <math>\pi_1(X, x_0)</math>. This operation turns <math>\pi_1(X, x_0)</math> into a group. Its [[neutral element]] is the equivalence (homotopy) class of the constant loop, which stays at <math>x_0</math> for all times | The product of two homotopy classes of loops <math>[\gamma_0]</math> and <math>[\gamma_1]</math> is then defined as <math>[\gamma_0 \cdot \gamma_1]</math>. It can be shown that this product does not depend on the choice of representatives and therefore gives a [[Equivalence relation#Well-definedness under an equivalence relation|well-defined]] operation on the set <math>\pi_1(X, x_0)</math>. This operation turns <math>\pi_1(X, x_0)</math> into a group. Its [[neutral element]] is the equivalence (homotopy) class of the constant loop, which stays at <math>x_0</math> for all times <math>t</math> (i.e. this class consists of all loops that can be continuously deformed into the constant loop; intuitively speaking of all the loops that do not "wrap around a hole"). The [[inverse element|inverse]] of a (homotopy class of a) loop is the same loop, but traversed in the opposite direction (which is in a different homotopy class). More formally, | ||
:<math>\gamma^{-1}(t) := \gamma(1-t).</math> | :<math>\gamma^{-1}(t) := \gamma(1-t).</math> | ||
Given three based loops <math>\gamma_0, \gamma_1, \gamma_2,</math> the product | Given three based loops <math>\gamma_0, \gamma_1, \gamma_2,</math> the product | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
===Dependence of the base point=== | ===Dependence of the base point=== | ||
Although the fundamental group in general depends on the choice of base point, it turns out that, up to [[isomorphism]], this choice makes no difference as long as the space | Although the fundamental group in general depends on the choice of base point, it turns out that, up to [[isomorphism]], this choice makes no difference as long as the space <math>X</math> is [[Connected space#Path connectedness|path-connected]]: more precisely, one obtains an isomorphism by pre- and post-concatenating with a path between the two basepoints. This isomorphism is, in general, not unique: it depends on the choice of path up to homotopy. However changing the path results in changing the isomorphism between the two fundamental groups only by composition with an [[inner automorphism]]. It is therefore customary to write <math>\pi_1(X)</math> instead of <math>\pi_1(X, x_0)</math> when the choice of basepoint does not matter. | ||
== Concrete examples == | == Concrete examples == | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
The [[circle]] (also known as the 1-sphere) | The [[circle]] (also known as the 1-sphere) | ||
:<math>S^1 = \left\{(x, y) \in \R^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 = 1\right\}</math> | :<math>S^1 = \left\{(x, y) \in \R^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 = 1\right\}</math> | ||
is not simply connected. Instead, each homotopy class consists of all loops that wind around the circle a given number of times (which can be positive or negative, depending on the direction of winding). The product of a loop that winds around | is not simply connected. Instead, each homotopy class consists of all loops that wind around the circle a given number of times (which can be positive or negative, depending on the direction of winding). The product of a loop that winds around <math>m</math> times and another that winds around <math>n</math> times is a loop that winds around <math>m + n</math> times. Therefore, the fundamental group of the circle is [[group isomorphism|isomorphic]] to <math>(\Z, +),</math> the additive group of [[Integer#Algebraic properties|integers]]. This fact can be used to give proofs of the [[Brouwer fixed point theorem]]<ref>{{harvtxt|May|1999|loc=Ch. 1, §6}}</ref> and the [[Borsuk–Ulam theorem]] in dimension 2.<ref>{{harvtxt|Massey|1991|loc=Ch. V, §9}}</ref> | ||
===The figure eight=== | ===The figure eight=== | ||
[[File: | [[File:Marked 2-rose.svg|thumb|class=skin-invert-image|The fundamental group of the figure eight is the [[free group]] on two generators {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}}.]] | ||
The fundamental group of the [[Rose (topology)|figure eight]] is the [[free group]] on two letters. The idea to prove this is as follows: choosing the base point to be the point where the two circles meet (dotted in black in the picture at the right), any loop <math>\gamma</math> can be decomposed as | The fundamental group of the [[Rose (topology)|figure eight]] is the [[free group]] on two letters. The idea to prove this is as follows: choosing the base point to be the point where the two circles meet (dotted in black in the picture at the right), any loop <math>\gamma</math> can be decomposed as | ||
<math display=block>\gamma = a^{n_1} b^{m_1} \cdots a^{n_k} b^{m_k}</math> | |||
where | where {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} are the two loops winding around each half of the figure as depicted, and the exponents <math>n_1, \dots, n_k, m_1, \dots, m_k</math> are integers. Unlike <math>\pi_1(S^1)</math>, the fundamental group of the figure eight is ''not'' [[abelian group|abelian]]: the two ways of composing <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> are not homotopic to each other: | ||
<math display=block>[a] \cdot [b] \ne [b] \cdot [a]</math> | |||
More generally, the fundamental group of a [[Rose (topology)|bouquet of | More generally, the fundamental group of a [[Rose (topology)|bouquet of <math>r</math> circles]] is the free group on <math>r</math> letters. | ||
The fundamental group of a [[wedge sum]] of two [[path connected space]]s | The fundamental group of a [[wedge sum]] of two [[path connected space]]s <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> can be computed as the [[free product]] of the individual fundamental groups: | ||
<math display=block>\pi_1(X \vee Y) \cong \pi_1(X) * \pi_1(Y)</math> | |||
This generalizes the above observations since the figure eight is the wedge sum of two circles. | This generalizes the above observations since the figure eight is the wedge sum of two circles. | ||
The fundamental group of the plane punctured at | The fundamental group of the plane punctured at <math>n</math> points is also the free group with <math>n</math> generators. The <math>i</math>-th generator is the class of the loop that goes around the <math>i</math>-th puncture without going around any other punctures. | ||
=== Graphs === | === Graphs === | ||
The fundamental group can be defined for discrete structures too. In particular, consider a [[Connectivity (graph theory)|connected]] [[graph (discrete mathematics)|graph]] | The fundamental group can be defined for discrete structures too. In particular, consider a [[Connectivity (graph theory)|connected]] [[graph (discrete mathematics)|graph]] <math>G = (V, E)</math>, with a designated vertex <math>v_0</math> in <math>V</math>. The loops in <math>G</math> are the [[cycle (graph theory)|cycles]] that start and end at <math>v_0</math>.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Meaning of Fundamental group of a graph|url=https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/515896/meaning-of-fundamental-group-of-a-graph|access-date=2020-07-28|website=Mathematics Stack Exchange}}</ref> Let <math>T</math> be a [[spanning tree]] of <math>G</math>. Every simple loop in <math>G</math> contains exactly one edge in <math>E \setminus T</math>; every loop in <math>G</math> is a concatenation of such simple loops. Therefore, the fundamental group of a [[graph (discrete mathematics)|graph]] is a [[free group]], in which the number of generators is exactly the number of edges in <math>E \setminus T</math>. This number equals <math>|E| - |V| + 1</math>.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Simon|first=J|date=2008|title=Example of calculating the fundamental group of a graph G|url=http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jsimon/COURSES/M201Fall08/HandoutsAndHomework/Graph1.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728164140/http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jsimon/COURSES/M201Fall08/HandoutsAndHomework/Graph1.pdf|archive-date=2020-07-28|url-status=dead|access-date=2020-07-28}}</ref> | ||
For example, suppose | For example, suppose <math>G</math> has 16 vertices arranged in 4 rows of 4 vertices each, with edges connecting vertices that are adjacent horizontally or vertically. Then <math>G</math> has 24 edges overall, and the number of edges in each spanning tree is {{nowrap|16 − 1 {{=}} 15}}, so the fundamental group of <math>G</math> is the free group with 9 generators.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Fundamental Groups of Connected Graphs - Mathonline|url=http://mathonline.wikidot.com/the-fundamental-groups-of-connected-graphs|access-date=2020-07-28|website=mathonline.wikidot.com}}</ref> Note that <math>G</math> has 9 "holes", similarly to a bouquet of 9 circles, which has the same fundamental group. | ||
===Knot groups=== | ===Knot groups=== | ||
[[File:Trefoil_knot_left.svg|thumb|A [[trefoil knot]] | [[File:Trefoil_knot_left.svg|thumb|class=skin-invert-image|A [[trefoil knot]]]] | ||
''[[Knot group]]s'' are by definition the fundamental group of the [[complement (set theory)|complement]] of a [[knot (mathematics)|knot]] <math>K</math> embedded in <math>\R^3 | ''[[Knot group]]s'' are by definition the fundamental group of the [[complement (set theory)|complement]] of a [[knot (mathematics)|knot]] <math>K</math> embedded in <math>\R^3</math>. For example, the knot group of the [[trefoil knot]] is known to be the [[braid group]] <math>B_3</math>, which gives another example of a non-abelian fundamental group. The [[Wirtinger presentation]] explicitly describes knot groups in terms of [[generators and relations]] based on a diagram of the knot. Therefore, knot groups have some usage in [[knot theory]] to distinguish between knots: if <math>\pi_1(\R^3 \setminus K)</math> is not isomorphic to some other knot group <math>\pi_1(\R^3 \setminus K')</math> of another knot <math>K'</math>, then <math>K</math> cannot be transformed into <math>K'</math>. Thus the trefoil knot cannot be continuously transformed into the circle (also known as the [[unknot]]), since the latter has knot group <math>\Z</math>. There are, however, knots that cannot be deformed into each other, but have isomorphic knot groups. | ||
===Oriented surfaces=== | ===Oriented surfaces=== | ||
The fundamental group of a [[genus (mathematics)#Orientable surface|genus-''n'' orientable surface]] can be computed in terms of [[generators and relations]] as | The fundamental group of a [[genus (mathematics)#Orientable surface|genus-''n'' orientable surface]] can be computed in terms of [[generators and relations]] as | ||
<math display=block>\left\langle A_1, B_1, \ldots, A_n, B_n \left| A_1 B_1 A_1^{-1} B_1^{-1} \cdots A_n B_n A_n^{-1} B_n^{-1} \right. \right\rangle.</math> | |||
This includes the [[torus (mathematics)|torus]], being the case of genus 1, whose fundamental group is | This includes the [[torus (mathematics)|torus]], being the case of genus 1, whose fundamental group is | ||
<math display=block>\left\langle A_1, B_1 \left| A_1 B_1 A_1^{-1} B_1^{-1} \right. \right\rangle \cong \Z^2.</math> | |||
===Topological groups=== | ===Topological groups=== | ||
The fundamental group of a [[topological group]] | The fundamental group of a [[topological group]] <math>X</math> (with respect to the base point being the neutral element) is always commutative. In particular, the fundamental group of a [[Lie group]] is commutative. In fact, the group structure on <math>X</math> endows <math>\pi_1(X)</math> with another group structure: given two loops <math>\gamma</math> and <math>\gamma'</math> in <math>X</math>, another loop <math>\gamma \star \gamma'</math> can defined by using the group multiplication in <math>X</math>: | ||
:<math>(\gamma \star \gamma')(x) = \gamma(x) \cdot \gamma'(x).</math> | :<math>(\gamma \star \gamma')(x) = \gamma(x) \cdot \gamma'(x).</math> | ||
This binary operation <math>\star</math> on the set of all loops is ''a priori'' independent from the one described above. However, the [[Eckmann–Hilton argument]] shows that it does in fact agree with the above concatenation of loops, and moreover that the resulting group structure is abelian.<ref>{{harvtxt|Strom|2011|loc=Problem 9.30, 9.31}}, {{harvtxt|Hall|2015|loc=Exercise 13.7}}</ref><ref>Proof: Given two loops <math>\alpha, \beta: [0, 1] \to G</math> in <math>\pi_1(G),</math> define the mapping <math>A\colon [0, 1] \times [0, 1] \to G</math> by <math>A(s, t) = \alpha(s)\cdot\beta(t),</math> multiplied pointwise in <math>G.</math> Consider the homotopy family of paths in the rectangle from <math>(s, t) = (0, 0)</math> to <math>(1, 1)</math> that starts with the horizontal-then-vertical path, moves through various diagonal paths, and ends with the vertical-then-horizontal path. Composing this family with <math>A</math> gives a homotopy <math>\alpha * \beta \sim \beta * \alpha,</math> which shows the fundamental group is abelian.</ref> | This binary operation <math>\star</math> on the set of all loops is ''a priori'' independent from the one described above. However, the [[Eckmann–Hilton argument]] shows that it does in fact agree with the above concatenation of loops, and moreover that the resulting group structure is abelian.<ref>{{harvtxt|Strom|2011|loc=Problem 9.30, 9.31}}, {{harvtxt|Hall|2015|loc=Exercise 13.7}}</ref><ref>Proof: Given two loops <math>\alpha, \beta: [0, 1] \to G</math> in <math>\pi_1(G),</math> define the mapping <math>A\colon [0, 1] \times [0, 1] \to G</math> by <math>A(s, t) = \alpha(s)\cdot\beta(t),</math> multiplied pointwise in <math>G.</math> Consider the homotopy family of paths in the rectangle from <math>(s, t) = (0, 0)</math> to <math>(1, 1)</math> that starts with the horizontal-then-vertical path, moves through various diagonal paths, and ends with the vertical-then-horizontal path. Composing this family with <math>A</math> gives a homotopy <math>\alpha * \beta \sim \beta * \alpha,</math> which shows the fundamental group is abelian.</ref> | ||
An inspection of the proof shows that, more generally, <math>\pi_1(X)</math> is abelian for any [[H-space]] | An inspection of the proof shows that, more generally, <math>\pi_1(X)</math> is abelian for any [[H-space]] <math>X</math>, i.e., the multiplication need not have an inverse, nor does it have to be associative. For example, this shows that the fundamental group of a [[loop space]] of another topological space <math>Y</math>, <math>X = \Omega(Y),</math> is abelian. Related ideas lead to [[Heinz Hopf]]'s computation of the [[Hopf algebra#Cohomology of Lie groups|cohomology of a Lie group]]. | ||
== Functoriality == | == Functoriality == | ||
| Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
from the [[category of pointed spaces|category of topological spaces together with a base point]] to the [[category of groups]]. It turns out that this functor does not distinguish maps that are [[homotopic]] relative to the base point: if <math>f,g:X\to Y</math> are continuous maps with <math>f(x_0) = g(x_0) = y_0</math>, and | from the [[category of pointed spaces|category of topological spaces together with a base point]] to the [[category of groups]]. It turns out that this functor does not distinguish maps that are [[homotopic]] relative to the base point: if <math>f,g:X\to Y</math> are continuous maps with <math>f(x_0) = g(x_0) = y_0</math>, and <math>f</math> and <math>g</math> are homotopic relative to <math>\{x_0\}</math>, then <math>f_* = g_*</math>. As a consequence, two [[homotopy equivalent]] path-connected spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups: | ||
:<math>X \simeq Y \implies \pi_1(X, x_0) \cong \pi_1(Y, y_0).</math> | :<math>X \simeq Y \implies \pi_1(X, x_0) \cong \pi_1(Y, y_0).</math> | ||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
is a [[homotopy equivalence]] and therefore yields an isomorphism of their fundamental groups. | is a [[homotopy equivalence]] and therefore yields an isomorphism of their fundamental groups. | ||
The fundamental group functor takes [[product topology|products]] to [[direct product|products]] and [[wedge sum|coproducts]] to [[free product of groups|coproducts]]. That is, if | The fundamental group functor takes [[product topology|products]] to [[direct product|products]] and [[wedge sum|coproducts]] to [[free product of groups|coproducts]]. That is, if <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> are path connected, then | ||
:<math>\pi_1 (X \times Y, (x_0, y_0)) \cong \pi_1(X, x_0) \times \pi_1(Y, y_0)</math> | :<math>\pi_1 (X \times Y, (x_0, y_0)) \cong \pi_1(X, x_0) \times \pi_1(Y, y_0)</math> | ||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
A special case of the [[Hurewicz theorem]] asserts that the first [[singular homology|singular homology group]] <math>H_1(X)</math> is, colloquially speaking, the closest approximation to the fundamental group by means of an abelian group. In more detail, mapping the homotopy class of each loop to the homology class of the loop gives a [[group homomorphism]] | A special case of the [[Hurewicz theorem]] asserts that the first [[singular homology|singular homology group]] <math>H_1(X)</math> is, colloquially speaking, the closest approximation to the fundamental group by means of an abelian group. In more detail, mapping the homotopy class of each loop to the homology class of the loop gives a [[group homomorphism]] | ||
:<math>\pi_1(X) \to H_1(X)</math> | :<math>\pi_1(X) \to H_1(X)</math> | ||
from the fundamental group of a topological space | from the fundamental group of a topological space <math>X</math> to its first singular homology group <math>H_1(X).</math> This homomorphism is not in general an isomorphism since the fundamental group may be non-abelian, but the homology group is, by definition, always abelian. This difference is, however, the only one: if <math>X</math> is path-connected, this homomorphism is [[surjective]] and its [[Kernel (algebra)|kernel]] is the [[commutator subgroup]] of the fundamental group, so that <math>H_1(X)</math> is isomorphic to the [[abelianization]] of the fundamental group.<ref>{{harvtxt|Fulton|1995|loc=Prop. 12.22}}</ref> | ||
===Gluing topological spaces=== | ===Gluing topological spaces=== | ||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
===Coverings=== | ===Coverings=== | ||
[[File:Covering_map.svg|thumb|The map <math>\mathbb{R} \times [0,1] \to S^1 \times [0,1]</math> is a covering: the preimage of | [[File:Covering_map.svg|thumb|The map <math>\mathbb{R} \times [0,1] \to S^1 \times [0,1]</math> is a covering: the preimage of <math>U</math> (highlighted in gray) is a disjoint union of copies of <math>U</math>. Moreover, it is a universal covering since <math>\mathbb{R} \times [0,1]</math> is contractible and therefore simply connected.]] | ||
Given a topological space | Given a topological space <math>B</math>, a [[continuous function (topology)|continuous map]] | ||
:<math>f: E \to B</math> | :<math>f: E \to B</math> | ||
is called a ''covering'' or | is called a ''covering'' or <math>E</math> is called a ''[[covering space]]'' of <math>B</math> if every point <math>b</math> in <math>B</math> admits an [[open neighborhood]] <math>U</math> such that there is a [[homeomorphism]] between the [[preimage]] of <math>U</math> and a [[disjoint union]] of copies of <math>U</math> (indexed by some set <math>I</math>), | ||
:<math>\varphi: \bigsqcup_{i \in I} U \to f^{-1}(U)</math> | :<math>\varphi: \bigsqcup_{i \in I} U \to f^{-1}(U)</math> | ||
in such a way that <math> | in such a way that <math>f \circ \varphi</math> is the standard projection map <math>\bigsqcup_{i \in I} U \to U.</math><ref>{{harvtxt|Hatcher|2002|loc=§1.3}}</ref> | ||
====Universal covering==== | ====Universal covering==== | ||
A covering is called a [[universal covering]] if | A covering is called a [[universal covering]] if <math>E</math> is, in addition to the preceding condition, simply connected.<ref>{{harvtxt|Hatcher|2002|loc=p. 65}}</ref> It is universal in the sense that all other coverings can be constructed by suitably identifying points in <math>E</math>. Knowing a universal covering | ||
:<math>p: \widetilde{X} \to X</math> | :<math>p: \widetilde{X} \to X</math> | ||
of a topological space | of a topological space <math>X</math> is helpful in understanding its fundamental group in several ways: first, <math>\pi_1(X)</math> identifies with the group of [[deck transformations]], i.e., the group of [[homeomorphism]]s <math>\varphi : \widetilde{X} \to \widetilde{X}</math> that commute with the map to <math>X</math>, i.e., <math>p \circ \varphi = p.</math> | ||
Another relation to the fundamental group is that <math>\pi_1(X, x)</math> can be identified with the fiber <math>p^{-1}(x).</math> For example, the map | Another relation to the fundamental group is that <math>\pi_1(X, x)</math> can be identified with the fiber <math>p^{-1}(x).</math> For example, the map | ||
:<math>p: \mathbb{R} \to S^1,\, t \mapsto \exp(2 \pi i t)</math> | :<math>p: \mathbb{R} \to S^1,\, t \mapsto \exp(2 \pi i t)</math> | ||
(or, equivalently, <math>\pi: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} / \mathbb{Z},\ t \mapsto [t]</math>) is a universal covering. The deck transformations are the maps <math>t \mapsto t + n</math> for <math>n \in \mathbb{Z}.</math> This is in line with the identification <math>p^{-1}(1) = \mathbb{Z},</math> in particular this proves the above claim <math>\pi_1(S^1) \cong \mathbb{Z}.</math> | (or, equivalently, <math>\pi: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} / \mathbb{Z},\ t \mapsto [t]</math>) is a universal covering. The deck transformations are the maps <math>t \mapsto t + n</math> for <math>n \in \mathbb{Z}.</math> This is in line with the identification <math>p^{-1}(1) = \mathbb{Z},</math> in particular this proves the above claim <math>\pi_1(S^1) \cong \mathbb{Z}.</math> | ||
Any path connected, [[Locally_connected_space#Definitions|locally path connected]] and [[locally simply connected]] topological space | Any path connected, [[Locally_connected_space#Definitions|locally path connected]] and [[locally simply connected]] topological space <math>X</math> admits a universal covering.<ref>{{harvtxt|Hatcher|2002|loc=Proposition 1.36}}</ref> An abstract construction proceeds analogously to the fundamental group by taking pairs <math>(x,\gamma)</math>, where <math>x</math> is a point in <math>X</math> and <math>\gamma</math> is a homotopy class of paths from <math>x_0</math> to <math>x</math>. The passage from a topological space to its universal covering can be used in understanding the geometry of <math>X</math>. For example, the [[uniformization theorem]] shows that any simply connected [[Riemann surface]] is (isomorphic to) either <math>S^2,</math> <math>\mathbb{C},</math> or the [[upper half-plane]].<ref>{{harvtxt|Forster|1981|loc=Theorem 27.9}}</ref> General Riemann surfaces then arise as quotients of [[group action]]s on these three surfaces. | ||
The [[quotient topology|quotient]] of a [[Group action#Remarkable properties of actions|free action]] of a [[discrete topology|discrete]] group | The [[quotient topology|quotient]] of a [[Group action#Remarkable properties of actions|free action]] of a [[discrete topology|discrete]] group <math>G</math> on a simply connected space <math>Y</math> has fundamental group | ||
:<math>\pi_1(Y/G) \cong G.</math> | :<math>\pi_1(Y/G) \cong G.</math> | ||
As an example, the real | As an example, the real <math>n</math>-dimensional real [[projective space]] <math>\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^n</math> is obtained as the quotient of the <math>n</math>-dimensional unit sphere <math>S^n</math> by the antipodal action of the group <math>\mathbb{Z}/2</math> sending <math>x \in S^n</math> to <math>-x.</math> As <math>S^n</math> is simply connected for <math>n \geq 2</math>, it is a universal cover of <math>\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^n</math> in these cases, which implies <math>\pi_1(\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^n) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2</math> for <math>n \geq 2</math>. | ||
====Lie groups==== | ====Lie groups==== | ||
Let | Let <math>G</math> be a connected, simply connected [[compact Lie group]], for example, the [[special unitary group]] <math>\text{SU}(n)</math>, and let <math>\Gamma</math> be a finite subgroup of <math>G</math>. Then the [[homogeneous space]] <math>X=G/\Gamma</math> has fundamental group <math>\Gamma</math>, which acts by right multiplication on the universal covering space <math>G</math>. Among the many variants of this construction, one of the most important is given by [[locally symmetric space]]s <math>X = \Gamma \setminus G / K</math>, where | ||
* | *<math>G</math> is a non-compact simply connected, connected [[Lie group]] (often [[semisimple Lie group|semisimple]]), | ||
* | *<math>K</math> is a maximal compact subgroup of <math>G</math> | ||
* | * <math>\Gamma</math> is a discrete [[countable set|countable]] [[torsion-free group|torsion-free]] subgroup of <math>G</math>. | ||
In this case the fundamental group is | In this case the fundamental group is <math>\Gamma</math> and the universal covering space <math>G/K</math> is actually [[contractible]] (by the [[Cartan decomposition]] for Lie groups). | ||
As an example take | As an example take <math>G = \text{SL}(2,\R)</math>, <math>K = \text{SO}(2)</math> and <math>\Gamma</math> any torsion-free [[congruence subgroup]] of the [[modular group]] <math>\text{SL}(2,\Z)</math>. | ||
From the explicit realization, it also follows that the universal covering space of a path connected [[topological group]] | From the explicit realization, it also follows that the universal covering space of a path connected [[topological group]] <math>H</math> is again a path connected topological group <math>G</math>. Moreover, the covering map is a continuous [[open map|open]] homomorphism of <math>G</math> onto <math>H</math> with kernel <math>\Gamma</math>, a closed discrete [[normal subgroup]] of <math>G</math>: | ||
:<math>1 \to \Gamma \to G \to H \to 1.</math> | :<math>1 \to \Gamma \to G \to H \to 1.</math> | ||
Since | Since <math>G</math> is a connected group with a continuous action by conjugation on a discrete group <math>\Gamma</math>, it must act trivially, so that <math>\Gamma</math> has to be a subgroup of the [[center (group theory)|center]] of <math>G</math>. In particular <math>\pi_1(H) = \Gamma</math> is an [[abelian group]]; this can also easily be seen directly without using covering spaces. The group <math>G</math> is called the ''[[universal covering group]]'' of <math>H</math>. | ||
As the universal covering group suggests, there is an analogy between the fundamental group of a topological group and the center of a group; this is elaborated at [[Covering group#Lattice of covering groups|Lattice of covering groups]]. | As the universal covering group suggests, there is an analogy between the fundamental group of a topological group and the center of a group; this is elaborated at [[Covering group#Lattice of covering groups|Lattice of covering groups]]. | ||
===Fibrations=== | ===Fibrations=== | ||
''[[Fibrations]]'' provide a very powerful means to compute homotopy groups. A fibration | ''[[Fibrations]]'' provide a very powerful means to compute homotopy groups. A fibration <math>f</math> the so-called ''total space'', and the base space <math>B</math> has, in particular, the property that all its fibers <math>f^{-1}(b)</math> are homotopy equivalent and therefore can not be distinguished using fundamental groups (and higher homotopy groups), provided that <math>B</math> is path-connected.<ref>{{harvtxt|Hatcher|2002|loc=Prop. 4.61}}</ref> Therefore, the space <math>E</math> can be regarded as a "[[Dehn twist|twisted]] product" of the [[fibration|base space]] <math>B</math> and the [[Fiber (algebraic geometry)|fiber]] <math>F = f^{-1}(b).</math> The great importance of fibrations to the computation of homotopy groups stems from a [[Homotopy group#Long exact sequence of a fibration|long exact sequence]] | ||
:<math>\dots \to \pi_2(B) \to \pi_1(F) \to \pi_1(E) \to \pi_1(B) \to \pi_0(F) \to \pi_0(E)</math> | :<math>\dots \to \pi_2(B) \to \pi_1(F) \to \pi_1(E) \to \pi_1(B) \to \pi_0(F) \to \pi_0(E)</math> | ||
provided that | provided that <math>B</math> is path-connected.<ref>{{harvtxt|Hatcher|2002|loc=Theorem 4.41}}</ref> The term <math>\pi_2(B)</math> is the second [[homotopy group]] of <math>B</math>, which is defined to be the set of homotopy classes of maps from <math>S^2</math> to <math>B</math>, in direct analogy with the definition of <math>\pi_1.</math> | ||
If | If <math>E</math> happens to be path-connected and simply connected, this sequence reduces to an isomorphism | ||
:<math>\pi_1(B) \cong \pi_0(F)</math> | :<math>\pi_1(B) \cong \pi_0(F)</math> | ||
which generalizes the above fact about the universal covering (which amounts to the case where the fiber | which generalizes the above fact about the universal covering (which amounts to the case where the fiber <math>F</math> is also discrete). If instead <math>F</math> happens to be connected and simply connected, it reduces to an isomorphism | ||
:<math>\pi_1(E) \cong \pi_1(B).</math> | :<math>\pi_1(E) \cong \pi_1(B).</math> | ||
What is more, the sequence can be continued at the left with the higher homotopy groups <math>\pi_n</math> of the three spaces, which gives some access to computing such groups in the same vein. | What is more, the sequence can be continued at the left with the higher homotopy groups <math>\pi_n</math> of the three spaces, which gives some access to computing such groups in the same vein. | ||
| Line 240: | Line 240: | ||
is a fibration and therefore its kernel <math>\Gamma \subset \mathfrak t</math> identifies with <math>\pi_1(T).</math> The map | is a fibration and therefore its kernel <math>\Gamma \subset \mathfrak t</math> identifies with <math>\pi_1(T).</math> The map | ||
:<math>\pi_1(T) \to \pi_1(K)</math> | :<math>\pi_1(T) \to \pi_1(K)</math> | ||
can be shown to be surjective<ref>{{harvtxt|Bump|2013|loc=Prop. 23.7}}</ref> with kernel given by the set | can be shown to be surjective<ref>{{harvtxt|Bump|2013|loc=Prop. 23.7}}</ref> with kernel given by the set <math>I</math> of integer linear combination of [[coroot]]s. This leads to the computation | ||
:<math>\pi_1(K) \cong \Gamma / I.</math><ref>{{harvtxt|Hall|2015|loc=Corollary 13.18}}</ref> | :<math>\pi_1(K) \cong \Gamma / I.</math><ref>{{harvtxt|Hall|2015|loc=Corollary 13.18}}</ref> | ||
This method shows, for example, that any connected compact Lie group for which the associated root system is of [[G2 (mathematics)|type <math>G_2</math>]] is simply connected.<ref>{{harvtxt|Hall|2015|loc=Example 13.45}}</ref> Thus, there is (up to isomorphism) only one connected compact Lie group having Lie algebra of type <math>G_2</math>; this group is simply connected and has trivial center. | This method shows, for example, that any connected compact Lie group for which the associated root system is of [[G2 (mathematics)|type <math>G_2</math>]] is simply connected.<ref>{{harvtxt|Hall|2015|loc=Example 13.45}}</ref> Thus, there is (up to isomorphism) only one connected compact Lie group having Lie algebra of type <math>G_2</math>; this group is simply connected and has trivial center. | ||
| Line 247: | Line 247: | ||
When the topological space is homeomorphic to a [[simplicial complex]], its fundamental group can be described explicitly in terms of [[Presentation of a group|generators and relations]]. | When the topological space is homeomorphic to a [[simplicial complex]], its fundamental group can be described explicitly in terms of [[Presentation of a group|generators and relations]]. | ||
If | If <math>X</math> is a [[connected space|connected]] simplicial complex, an ''edge-path'' in <math>X</math> is defined to be a chain of vertices connected by edges in <math>X</math>. Two edge-paths are said to be ''edge-equivalent'' if one can be obtained from the other by successively switching between an edge and the two opposite edges of a triangle in <math>X</math>. If <math>v</math> is a fixed vertex in <math>X</math>, an ''edge-loop'' at <math>v</math> is an edge-path starting and ending at <math>v</math>. The '''edge-path group''' <math>E(X,v)</math> is defined to be the set of edge-equivalence classes of edge-loops at <math>v</math>, with product and inverse defined by concatenation and reversal of edge-loops. | ||
The edge-path group is naturally isomorphic to | The edge-path group is naturally isomorphic to <math>\pi_1(|X|,v)</math>, the fundamental group of the [[Simplicial set|geometric realisation]] <math>|X|</math> of <math>X</math>.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Singer|first1=Isadore|author-link1=Isadore Singer|last2=Thorpe|first2=John A.|title=Lecture notes on elementary topology and geometry|url=https://archive.org/details/lecturenotesonel00sing_949|url-access=limited|date=1967|publisher=Springer-Verlag|isbn=0-387-90202-3|page=[https://archive.org/details/lecturenotesonel00sing_949/page/n101 98]}}</ref> Since it depends only on the [[n-skeleton|2-skeleton]] <math>X^2</math> of <math>X</math> (that is, the vertices, edges, and triangles of <math>X</math>), the groups <math>\pi_1(|X|,v)</math> and <math>\pi_1(|X^2|,v)</math> are isomorphic. | ||
The edge-path group can be described explicitly in terms of [[generators and relations]]. If | The edge-path group can be described explicitly in terms of [[generators and relations]]. If <math>T</math> is a [[spanning tree|maximal spanning tree]] in the [[n-skeleton|1-skeleton]] of <math>X</math>, then <math>E(X,v)</math> is canonically isomorphic to the group with generators (the oriented edge-paths of <math>X</math> not occurring in <math>T</math>) and relations (the edge-equivalences corresponding to triangles in <math>X</math>). A similar result holds if <math>T</math> is replaced by any [[simply connected]]—in particular [[contractible]]—subcomplex of <math>X</math>. This often gives a practical way of computing fundamental groups and can be used to show that every [[finitely presented group]] arises as the fundamental group of a finite simplicial complex. It is also one of the classical methods used for [[Surface (topology)|topological surfaces]], which are classified by their fundamental groups. | ||
The ''universal covering space'' of a finite connected simplicial complex | The ''universal covering space'' of a finite connected simplicial complex <math>X</math> can also be described directly as a simplicial complex using edge-paths. Its vertices are pairs <math>(w,\gamma)</math> where <math>w</math> is a vertex of <math>X</math> and γ is an edge-equivalence class of paths from <math>v</math> to <math>w</math>. The <math>k</math>-simplices containing <math>(w,\gamma)</math> correspond naturally to the <math>k</math>-simplices containing <math>w</math>. Each new vertex <math>u</math> of the <math>k</math>-simplex gives an edge <math>w u</math> and hence, by concatenation, a new path <math>\gamma_u</math> from <math>v</math> to <math>u</math>. The points <math>(w,\gamma)</math> and <math>(u,\gamma_u)</math> are the vertices of the "transported" simplex in the universal covering space. The edge-path group acts naturally by concatenation, preserving the simplicial structure, and the quotient space is just <math>X</math>. | ||
It is well known that this method can also be used to compute the fundamental group of an arbitrary topological space. This was doubtless known to [[Eduard Čech]] and [[Jean Leray]] and explicitly appeared as a remark in a paper by [[André Weil]];<ref>[[André Weil]], ''On discrete subgroups of Lie groups'', [[Annals of Mathematics]] '''72''' (1960), 369-384.</ref> various other authors such as Lorenzo Calabi, [[Wu Wenjun|Wu Wen-tsün]], and Nodar Berikashvili have also published proofs. In the simplest case of a compact space | It is well known that this method can also be used to compute the fundamental group of an arbitrary topological space. This was doubtless known to [[Eduard Čech]] and [[Jean Leray]] and explicitly appeared as a remark in a paper by [[André Weil]];<ref>[[André Weil]], ''On discrete subgroups of Lie groups'', [[Annals of Mathematics]] '''72''' (1960), 369-384.</ref> various other authors such as Lorenzo Calabi, [[Wu Wenjun|Wu Wen-tsün]], and Nodar Berikashvili have also published proofs. In the simplest case of a compact space <math>X</math> with a finite open covering in which all [[empty set|non-empty]] finite [[intersection (set theory)|intersections]] of open sets in the covering are contractible, the fundamental group can be identified with the edge-path group of the simplicial complex corresponding to the [[Nerve of an open covering|nerve of the covering]]. | ||
== Realizability == | == Realizability == | ||
| Line 264: | Line 264: | ||
===Higher homotopy groups=== | ===Higher homotopy groups=== | ||
Roughly speaking, the fundamental group detects the 1-dimensional hole structure of a space, but not higher-dimensional holes such as for the 2-sphere. Such "higher-dimensional holes" can be detected using the higher [[homotopy group]]s <math>\pi_n(X)</math>, which are defined to consist of homotopy classes of (basepoint-preserving) maps from <math>S^n</math> to | Roughly speaking, the fundamental group detects the 1-dimensional hole structure of a space, but not higher-dimensional holes such as for the 2-sphere. Such "higher-dimensional holes" can be detected using the higher [[homotopy group]]s <math>\pi_n(X)</math>, which are defined to consist of homotopy classes of (basepoint-preserving) maps from <math>S^n</math> to <math>X</math>. For example, the [[Hurewicz theorem]] implies that for all <math>n \ge 1</math> the [[homotopy groups of spheres|<math>n</math>-th homotopy group of the ''n''-sphere]] is | ||
:<math>\pi_n(S^n) = \Z.</math><ref>{{harvtxt|Hatcher|2002|loc=§4.1}}</ref> | :<math>\pi_n(S^n) = \Z.</math><ref>{{harvtxt|Hatcher|2002|loc=§4.1}}</ref> | ||
As was mentioned in the above computation of <math>\pi_1</math> of classical Lie groups, higher homotopy groups can be relevant even for computing fundamental groups. | As was mentioned in the above computation of <math>\pi_1</math> of classical Lie groups, higher homotopy groups can be relevant even for computing fundamental groups. | ||
===Loop space=== | ===Loop space=== | ||
The set of based loops (as is, i.e. not taken up to homotopy) in a [[pointed space]] | The set of based loops (as is, i.e. not taken up to homotopy) in a [[pointed space]] <math>X</math>, endowed with the [[compact open topology]], is known as the [[loop space]], denoted <math>\Omega X.</math> The fundamental group of <math>X</math> is in [[bijection]] with the set of [[path component]]s of its loop space:<ref>{{harvtxt|Adams|1978|loc=p. 5}}</ref> | ||
:<math>\pi_1(X) \cong \pi_0(\Omega X).</math> | :<math>\pi_1(X) \cong \pi_0(\Omega X).</math> | ||
| Line 275: | Line 275: | ||
The ''[[fundamental groupoid]]'' is a variant of the fundamental group that is useful in situations where the choice of a base point <math>x_0 \in X</math> is undesirable. It is defined by first considering the [[category (mathematics)|category]] of [[Moore path|path]]s in <math>X,</math> i.e., continuous functions | The ''[[fundamental groupoid]]'' is a variant of the fundamental group that is useful in situations where the choice of a base point <math>x_0 \in X</math> is undesirable. It is defined by first considering the [[category (mathematics)|category]] of [[Moore path|path]]s in <math>X,</math> i.e., continuous functions | ||
:<math>\gamma \colon [0, r] \to X</math>, | :<math>\gamma \colon [0, r] \to X</math>, | ||
where | where <math>r</math> is an arbitrary non-negative real number. Since the length <math>r</math> is variable in this approach, such paths can be concatenated as is (i.e., not up to homotopy) and therefore yield a category.<ref>{{harvtxt|Brown|loc=§6.1|2006}}</ref> Two such paths <math>\gamma, \gamma'</math> with the same endpoints and length <math>r</math>, resp. <math>r</math>' are considered equivalent if there exist real numbers <math>u,v \geqslant 0</math> such that <math>r + u = r' + v</math> and <math> \gamma_u, \gamma'_v \colon [0, r + u] \to X</math> are homotopic relative to their end points, where <math> \gamma_u (t) = \begin{cases} \gamma(t), & t \in [0, r] \\ \gamma(r), & t \in [r, r + u]. \end{cases} </math><ref>{{harvtxt|Brown|2006|loc=§6.2}}</ref><ref>{{harvtxt|Crowell|Fox|1963}} use a different definition by reparametrizing the paths to length ''1''.</ref> | ||
The category of paths up to this equivalence relation is denoted <math>\Pi (X).</math> Each morphism in <math>\Pi (X)</math> is an [[isomorphism]], with inverse given by the same path traversed in the opposite direction. Such a category is called a [[groupoid]]. It reproduces the fundamental group since | The category of paths up to this equivalence relation is denoted <math>\Pi (X).</math> Each morphism in <math>\Pi (X)</math> is an [[isomorphism]], with inverse given by the same path traversed in the opposite direction. Such a category is called a [[groupoid]]. It reproduces the fundamental group since | ||
:<math>\pi_1(X, x_0) = \mathrm{Hom}_{\Pi(X)}(x_0, x_0)</math>. | :<math>\pi_1(X, x_0) = \mathrm{Hom}_{\Pi(X)}(x_0, x_0)</math>. | ||
More generally, one can consider the fundamental groupoid on a set | More generally, one can consider the fundamental groupoid on a set <math>A</math> of base points, chosen according to the geometry of the situation; for example, in the case of the circle, which can be represented as the [[union (set theory)|union]] of two connected open sets whose intersection has two components, one can choose one base point in each component. The [[Seifert–van Kampen theorem|van Kampen theorem]] admits a version for fundamental groupoids which gives, for example, another way to compute the fundamental group(oid) of <math>S^1.</math><ref>{{harvtxt|Brown|2006|loc=§6.7}}</ref> | ||
===Local systems=== | ===Local systems=== | ||
Generally speaking, [[Group representation|representation]]s may serve to exhibit features of a group by its actions on other mathematical objects, often [[vector space]]s. Representations of the fundamental group have a very geometric significance: any ''[[local system]]'' (i.e., a [[sheaf (mathematics)|sheaf]] <math>\mathcal F</math> on | Generally speaking, [[Group representation|representation]]s may serve to exhibit features of a group by its actions on other mathematical objects, often [[vector space]]s. Representations of the fundamental group have a very geometric significance: any ''[[local system]]'' (i.e., a [[sheaf (mathematics)|sheaf]] <math>\mathcal F</math> on <math>X</math> with the property that locally in a sufficiently small neighborhood <math>U</math> of any point on <math>X</math>, the restriction of <math>F</math> is a [[constant sheaf]] of the form <math>\mathcal F|_U = \Q^n</math>) gives rise to the so-called [[monodromy representation]], a representation of the fundamental group on an <math>n</math>-[[dimension (vector space)|dimensional]] <math>\Q</math>-vector space. [[Converse (logic)|Conversely]], any such representation on a path-connected space <math>X</math> arises in this manner.<ref>{{harvtxt|El Zein|Suciu|Tosun|Uludağ|2010|loc=p. 117, Prop. 1.7}}</ref> This [[equivalence of categories]] between representations of <math>\pi_1(X)</math> and local systems is used, for example, in the study of [[differential equation]]s, such as the [[Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations]]. | ||
===Étale fundamental group=== | ===Étale fundamental group=== | ||
In [[algebraic geometry]], the so-called [[étale fundamental group]] is used as a replacement for the fundamental group.<ref>{{harvtxt|Grothendieck|Raynaud|2003}}.</ref> Since the [[Zariski topology]] on an [[algebraic variety]] or [[scheme (mathematics)|scheme]] | In [[algebraic geometry]], the so-called [[étale fundamental group]] is used as a replacement for the fundamental group.<ref>{{harvtxt|Grothendieck|Raynaud|2003}}.</ref> Since the [[Zariski topology]] on an [[algebraic variety]] or [[scheme (mathematics)|scheme]] <math>X</math> is much [[comparison of topologies|coarser]] than, say, the [[topological space|topology]] of open subsets in <math>\R^n,</math> it is no longer meaningful to consider continuous maps from an [[interval (mathematics)|interval]] to <math>X</math>. Instead, the approach developed by [[Grothendieck]] consists in constructing <math>\pi_1^\text{et}</math> by considering all [[finite morphism|finite]] [[étale morphism|étale covers]] of <math>X</math>. These serve as an algebro-geometric analogue of coverings with finite fibers. | ||
This yields a theory applicable in situations where no great generality classical topological intuition whatsoever is available, for example for varieties defined over a [[finite field]]. Also, the étale fundamental group of a [[field (mathematics)|field]] is its ([[absolute Galois group|absolute]]) [[Galois group]]. On the other hand, for smooth varieties | This yields a theory applicable in situations where no great generality classical topological intuition whatsoever is available, for example for varieties defined over a [[finite field]]. Also, the étale fundamental group of a [[field (mathematics)|field]] is its ([[absolute Galois group|absolute]]) [[Galois group]]. On the other hand, for smooth varieties <math>X</math> over the complex numbers, the étale fundamental group retains much of the information inherent in the classical fundamental group: the former is the [[profinite completion]] of the latter.<ref>{{harvtxt|Grothendieck|Raynaud|2003|loc=Exposé XII, Cor. 5.2}}.</ref> | ||
===Fundamental group of algebraic groups=== | ===Fundamental group of algebraic groups=== | ||
The fundamental group of a [[root system]] is defined in analogy to the computation for Lie groups.<ref>{{harvtxt|Humphreys|loc=§13.1|1972}}</ref> This allows to define and use the fundamental group of a semisimple [[linear algebraic group]] | The fundamental group of a [[root system]] is defined in analogy to the computation for Lie groups.<ref>{{harvtxt|Humphreys|loc=§13.1|1972}}</ref> This allows to define and use the fundamental group of a semisimple [[linear algebraic group]] <math>G</math>, which is a useful basic tool in the classification of linear algebraic groups.<ref>{{harvtxt|Humphreys|loc=§31.1|2004}}</ref> | ||
===Fundamental group of simplicial sets=== | ===Fundamental group of simplicial sets=== | ||
The homotopy relation between 1-simplices of a [[simplicial set]] | The homotopy relation between 1-simplices of a [[simplicial set]] <math>X</math> is an equivalence relation if <math>X</math> is a [[Kan complex]] but not necessarily so in general.<ref>{{harvtxt|Goerss|Jardine|1999|loc=§I.7}}</ref> Thus, <math>\pi_1</math> of a Kan complex can be defined as the set of homotopy classes of 1-simplices. The fundamental group of an arbitrary simplicial set <math>X</math> are defined to be the homotopy group of its [[topological realization]], <math>|X|,</math> i.e., the topological space obtained by gluing topological simplices as prescribed by the simplicial set structure of <math>X</math>.<ref>{{harvtxt|Goerss|Jardine|1999|loc=§I.11}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 316: | Line 316: | ||
* {{Citation|isbn= 9780387943275|title= Algebraic Topology: A First Course|last1= Fulton|first1= William|author1-link= William Fulton (mathematician)|date= 1995|publisher= Springer|url-access= registration|url= https://archive.org/details/algebraictopolog00fult}} | * {{Citation|isbn= 9780387943275|title= Algebraic Topology: A First Course|last1= Fulton|first1= William|author1-link= William Fulton (mathematician)|date= 1995|publisher= Springer|url-access= registration|url= https://archive.org/details/algebraictopolog00fult}} | ||
* {{Citation | last1=Goerss | first1=Paul G. | last2=Jardine | first2=John F. | author-link2=Rick Jardine | title=Simplicial Homotopy Theory | publisher=Birkhäuser | location=Basel, Boston, Berlin | series=Progress in Mathematics | isbn=978-3-7643-6064-1 | year=1999 | volume=174 }} | * {{Citation | last1=Goerss | first1=Paul G. | last2=Jardine | first2=John F. | author-link2=Rick Jardine | title=Simplicial Homotopy Theory | publisher=Birkhäuser | location=Basel, Boston, Berlin | series=Progress in Mathematics | isbn=978-3-7643-6064-1 | year=1999 | volume=174 }} | ||
* {{Citation | last1=Grothendieck | first1=Alexandre | author1-link=Alexandre Grothendieck | last2=Raynaud | first2=Michèle | title=Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie - 1960-61 - Revêtements étales et groupe fondamental - (SGA 1) (Documents Mathématiques '''3''') | orig-year=1971 | arxiv=math.AG/0206203 | publisher=[[Société Mathématique de France]] | location=Paris | isbn=978-2-85629-141-2 | year=2003 | pages=xviii+327, see Exp. V, IX, X}} | * {{Citation | last1=Grothendieck | first1=Alexandre | author1-link=Alexandre Grothendieck | last2=Raynaud | first2=Michèle |author-link2=Michèle Raynaud | title=Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie - 1960-61 - Revêtements étales et groupe fondamental - (SGA 1) (Documents Mathématiques '''3''') | orig-year=1971 | arxiv=math.AG/0206203 | publisher=[[Société Mathématique de France]] | location=Paris | isbn=978-2-85629-141-2 | year=2003 | pages=xviii+327, see Exp. V, IX, X}} | ||
* {{Citation| last=Hall|first=Brian C.|title=Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction|edition=2nd|series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics|volume=222|publisher=Springer|year=2015|isbn=978-3319134666}} | * {{Citation| last=Hall|first=Brian C.|title=Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction|edition=2nd|series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics|volume=222|publisher=Springer|year=2015|isbn=978-3319134666}} | ||
* {{Citation|isbn=0-521-79540-0|title=Algebraic Topology|last1=Hatcher|first1=Allen|author-link=Allen Hatcher|year=2002|url= | * {{Citation|isbn=0-521-79540-0|title=Algebraic Topology|last1=Hatcher|first1=Allen|author-link=Allen Hatcher|year=2002|url=https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATpage.html|publisher=Cambridge University Press}} | ||
* [[Peter Hilton]] and [[Shaun Wylie]], ''Homology Theory'', Cambridge University Press (1967) [warning: these authors use ''contrahomology'' for [[cohomology]]] | * [[Peter Hilton]] and [[Shaun Wylie]], ''Homology Theory'', Cambridge University Press (1967) [warning: these authors use ''contrahomology'' for [[cohomology]]] | ||
* {{Citation|isbn=9780387901084|title=Linear Algebraic Groups|last1=Humphreys|first1=James E.|date=2004|publisher=Springer|series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics|issue=21|author1-link=James E. Humphreys}} | * {{Citation|isbn=9780387901084|title=Linear Algebraic Groups|last1=Humphreys|first1=James E.|date=2004|publisher=Springer|series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics|issue=21|author1-link=James E. Humphreys}} | ||