Anthophyta: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>OAbot m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. |
imported>Paleozoey m comma |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Detailed morphological and molecular studies have shown that the group is not actually [[monophyletic]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Coiro |first1=Mario |last2=Chomicki |first2=Guillaume |last3=Doyle |first3=James A. |date=n.d. |title=Experimental signal dissection and method sensitivity analyses reaffirm the potential of fossils and morphology in the resolution of the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/experimental-signal-dissection-and-method-sensitivity-analyses-reaffirm-the-potential-of-fossils-and-morphology-in-the-resolution-of-the-relationship-of-angiosperms-and-gnetales/77D0DC9945CCE39DAA1DC2FA2744A3D7 |journal=Paleobiology |volume=44 |issue=3 |pages=490–510 |doi=10.1017/pab.2018.23 |s2cid=91488394 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> with proposed floral homologies of the [[gnetophyte]]s and the [[angiosperm]]s having evolved in parallel.<ref name=Crepet2000/> This makes it easier to reconcile molecular clock data that suggests that the angiosperms diverged from the [[gymnosperm]]s around 320-300 mya.<ref name=Nam2003>{{cite journal | author=Nam J. | title=Antiquity and Evolution of the MADS-Box Gene Family Controlling Flower Development in Plants | journal=Mol. Biol. Evol. | volume=20 | issue=9 | pages=1435–1447 | year=2003 | doi=10.1093/molbev/msg152 | pmid=12777513 | display-authors=etal | doi-access=free }}</ref> | Detailed morphological and molecular studies have shown that the group is not actually [[monophyletic]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Coiro |first1=Mario |last2=Chomicki |first2=Guillaume |last3=Doyle |first3=James A. |date=n.d. |title=Experimental signal dissection and method sensitivity analyses reaffirm the potential of fossils and morphology in the resolution of the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/experimental-signal-dissection-and-method-sensitivity-analyses-reaffirm-the-potential-of-fossils-and-morphology-in-the-resolution-of-the-relationship-of-angiosperms-and-gnetales/77D0DC9945CCE39DAA1DC2FA2744A3D7 |journal=Paleobiology |volume=44 |issue=3 |pages=490–510 |doi=10.1017/pab.2018.23 |s2cid=91488394 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> with proposed floral homologies of the [[gnetophyte]]s and the [[angiosperm]]s having evolved in parallel.<ref name=Crepet2000/> This makes it easier to reconcile molecular clock data that suggests that the angiosperms diverged from the [[gymnosperm]]s around 320-300 mya.<ref name=Nam2003>{{cite journal | author=Nam J. | title=Antiquity and Evolution of the MADS-Box Gene Family Controlling Flower Development in Plants | journal=Mol. Biol. Evol. | volume=20 | issue=9 | pages=1435–1447 | year=2003 | doi=10.1093/molbev/msg152 | pmid=12777513 | display-authors=etal | doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
Some more recent studies have used the word anthophyte to describe a hypothetical group which includes the angiosperms and a variety of extinct seed plant groups (with various suggestions including at least some of the following groups: [[Glossopteridales|glossopterids]], [[Corystospermaceae|corystosperms]], [[Petriellales]] [[Pentoxylales]], [[Bennettitales]] and [[Caytoniales]]), but not the Gnetales.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/abstract/1133/1/3 |title=The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008 |date=June 2008 |journal=Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. |volume=1133 |pages=3–25 |doi=10.1196/annals.1438.005 |author=Soltis, D. E. |pmid=18559813 |last2=Bell |first2=CD |last3=Kim |first3=S |last4=Soltis |first4=PS |author-link4=Pamela S. Soltis |issue=1 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090108184520/http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/abstract/1133/1/3 |archive-date=8 January 2009 |citeseerx=10.1.1.463.7533 |s2cid=17688086 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Shi |first1=Gongle |last2=Herrera |first2=Fabiany |last3=Herendeen |first3=Patrick S. |last4=Clark |first4=Elizabeth G. |last5=Crane |first5=Peter R. |date=2021-06-10 |title=Mesozoic cupules and the origin of the angiosperm second integument |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03598-w |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=594 |issue=7862 |pages=223–226 |doi=10.1038/s41586-021-03598-w |issn=0028-0836|url-access=subscription }}</ref> | Some more recent studies have used the word anthophyte to describe a hypothetical group which includes the angiosperms and a variety of extinct seed plant groups (with various suggestions including at least some of the following groups: [[Glossopteridales|glossopterids]], [[Corystospermaceae|corystosperms]], [[Petriellales]], [[Pentoxylales]], [[Bennettitales]] and [[Caytoniales]]), but not the Gnetales.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/abstract/1133/1/3 |title=The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008 |date=June 2008 |journal=Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. |volume=1133 |pages=3–25 |doi=10.1196/annals.1438.005 |author=Soltis, D. E. |pmid=18559813 |last2=Bell |first2=CD |last3=Kim |first3=S |last4=Soltis |first4=PS |author-link4=Pamela S. Soltis |issue=1 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090108184520/http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/abstract/1133/1/3 |archive-date=8 January 2009 |citeseerx=10.1.1.463.7533 |s2cid=17688086 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Shi |first1=Gongle |last2=Herrera |first2=Fabiany |last3=Herendeen |first3=Patrick S. |last4=Clark |first4=Elizabeth G. |last5=Crane |first5=Peter R. |date=2021-06-10 |title=Mesozoic cupules and the origin of the angiosperm second integument |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03598-w |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=594 |issue=7862 |pages=223–226 |doi=10.1038/s41586-021-03598-w |issn=0028-0836|url-access=subscription }}</ref> | ||
{{Anthophyta}} | {{Anthophyta}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:42, 17 March 2026
The anthophytes are a paraphyletic grouping of plant taxa bearing flower-like reproductive structures. The group, once thought to be a clade,[1] contained the angiosperms – the extant flowering plants, such as roses and grasses – as well as the Gnetales and the extinct Bennettitales.[1]
Detailed morphological and molecular studies have shown that the group is not actually monophyletic,[2] with proposed floral homologies of the gnetophytes and the angiosperms having evolved in parallel.[3] This makes it easier to reconcile molecular clock data that suggests that the angiosperms diverged from the gymnosperms around 320-300 mya.[4]
Some more recent studies have used the word anthophyte to describe a hypothetical group which includes the angiosperms and a variety of extinct seed plant groups (with various suggestions including at least some of the following groups: glossopterids, corystosperms, Petriellales, Pentoxylales, Bennettitales and Caytoniales), but not the Gnetales.[5][6]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Doyle, J. A.; Donoghue, M. J. (1986). "Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach". Botanical Review. 52 (4): 321–431. doi:10.1007/bf02861082. S2CID 44844947.
- ↑ Coiro, Mario; Chomicki, Guillaume; Doyle, James A. (n.d.). "Experimental signal dissection and method sensitivity analyses reaffirm the potential of fossils and morphology in the resolution of the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales". Paleobiology. 44 (3): 490–510. doi:10.1017/pab.2018.23. S2CID 91488394.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedCrepet2000 - ↑ Nam J.; et al. (2003). "Antiquity and Evolution of the MADS-Box Gene Family Controlling Flower Development in Plants". Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (9): 1435–1447. doi:10.1093/molbev/msg152. PMID 12777513.
- ↑ Soltis, D. E.; Bell, CD; Kim, S; Soltis, PS (June 2008). "The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008". Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1133 (1): 3–25. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.463.7533. doi:10.1196/annals.1438.005. PMID 18559813. S2CID 17688086. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009.
- ↑ Shi, Gongle; Herrera, Fabiany; Herendeen, Patrick S.; Clark, Elizabeth G.; Crane, Peter R. (10 June 2021). "Mesozoic cupules and the origin of the angiosperm second integument". Nature. 594 (7862): 223–226. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03598-w. ISSN 0028-0836.