Incest: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Progenitor Eri
Undid revision 1300765397 by Philliipbrochard2 (talk)
 
imported>InternetArchiveBot
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Sexual activity between close relatives}}
{{About|human sexual relations with close kin|the biological process|Inbreeding|other uses}}
{{distinguish|Insect|Incense}}
{{distinguish|Insect|Incense}}
{{Short description|Sexual activity between close relatives}}
 
{{About|the variable social, legal, religious, and cultural attitudes and sanctions concerning human sexual relations with close kin|a detailed description of its legal aspects worldwide|Legality of incest|the biological act of reproducing with close kin|Inbreeding|the descriptive term for blood-related kin|Consanguinity|other uses}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2022}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2022}}
[[File:Woodcut illustration of Semiramis and her son Ninias - Penn Provenance Project.jpg|thumb|Woodcut illustration depicting incest between [[Semiramis]] and her son Ninias]]
[[File:Woodcut illustration of Semiramis and her son Ninias - Penn Provenance Project.jpg|thumb|Woodcut illustration depicting incest between [[Semiramis]] and her son Ninias]]
{{Family law}}
{{Family law}}
'''Incest''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɪ|n|s|ɛ|s|t|}} {{respell|IN|sest}}) is [[sexual intercourse|sex]] <!--NOTE: Using the term "sexual activity" is more accurate because the term "incest" does not only refer to sexual penetration, while the term "sexual intercourse" usually does imply sexual penetration.--> between [[kinship|close relatives]], for example a [[brother]], [[sister]], or [[parent]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Harkins |first1=Gillian |title=The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality |chapter=Incest |date=2015 |pages=583–625 |doi=10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs231|isbn=978-1-4051-9006-0 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Incest|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|year=2013|access-date=27 August 2013|url=http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/incest|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626012345/http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/incest|url-status=dead|archive-date=26 June 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Incest|publisher=[[Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network]] (RAINN)|year=2009|access-date=27 August 2013|url=http://www.rainn.org/get-information/types-of-sexual-assault/incest}}</ref> This typically includes sexual activity between people in [[consanguinity]] (blood relations), and sometimes those related by [[lineage (anthropology)|lineage]]. It is condemned and considered immoral in many societies. It can lead to an increased risk of [[genetic disorders]] in children in case of pregnancy from incestuous sex.
'''Incest''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɪ|n|s|ɛ|s|t|}} {{respell|IN|sest}}) is [[Human sexual activity|sexual activity]] between [[kinship|close relatives]], such as a [[sibling]] or [[parent]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Harkins |first1=Gillian |title=The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality |chapter=Incest |date=2015 |pages=583–625 |doi=10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs231|isbn=978-1-4051-9006-0 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Incest|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|year=2013|access-date=27 August 2013|url=http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/incest|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626012345/http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/incest|archive-date=26 June 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Incest|publisher=[[Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network]] (RAINN)|year=2009|access-date=27 August 2013|url=http://www.rainn.org/get-information/types-of-sexual-assault/incest}}</ref> This typically includes any kind of sexual activity between people in [[consanguinity]] (blood relations), and sometimes those related by [[lineage (anthropology)|lineage]]. It is condemned and considered immoral in many societies. It can lead to an increased risk of [[genetic disorders]] in children in case of pregnancy from incestuous sex.


The [[incest taboo]] is one of the most widespread of all cultural [[taboo]]s, both in present and in past societies.<ref name="Bittles">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t6CsCXXE8skC&pg=PA178 |title=Consanguinity in Context |last=Bittles |first=Alan Holland |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |year=2012 |isbn=978-0521781862 |pages=178–187 |access-date=27 August 2013}}</ref> Most modern societies have [[laws regarding incest]] or social restrictions on closely consanguineous marriages.<ref name="Bittles"/> In societies where it is illegal, consensual adult incest is seen by some as a [[victimless crime]].<ref name="spiegel">{{cite magazine |last=Hipp |first=Dietmar |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,540831,00.html |title=German High Court Takes a Look at Incest |date=11 March 2008 |magazine=Der Spiegel |access-date=12 April 2008}}</ref><ref name= Wolf169>{{cite book |title=Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century |first1=Arthur P. |last1=Wolf |first2=William H. |last2=Durham |author2-link=William H. Durham |year=2004 |publisher=Stanford University Press |page=169 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OW1nuQxcIQgC&pg=PA169 |isbn=978-0-8047-5141-4}}</ref> Some cultures extend the incest taboo to relatives with no consanguinity, such as [[Milk kinship|milk-siblings]], stepsiblings, and adoptive siblings, albeit sometimes with less intensity.<ref>Encyclopedia of Love in World Religions – Volume 1 – Page 321, Yudit Kornberg Greenberg – 2008</ref><ref>Language and Social Relations – Page 379, Asif Agha – 2007.</ref> Third-degree relatives (such as half-aunt, half-nephew, first cousin) on average have 12.5% common genetic heritage, and sexual relations between them are viewed differently in various cultures, from being discouraged to being socially acceptable.<ref>The Encyclopedia of Genetic Disorders and Birth Defects – Page 101, James Wynbrandt, Mark D. Ludman – 2009.</ref> Children of incestuous relationships have been regarded as [[Legitimacy (family law)|illegitimate]],{{Where|date=February 2024}} and are still so regarded in some societies today. In most cases, the parents did not have the option to marry to remove that status, as incestuous marriages were, and are, normally also prohibited.
The [[incest taboo]] is one of the most widespread of all cultural [[taboo]]s, both in present and in past societies.<ref name="Bittles">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t6CsCXXE8skC&pg=PA178 |title=Consanguinity in Context |last=Bittles |first=Alan Holland |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-521-78186-2 |pages=178–187 |access-date=27 August 2013}}</ref> Most modern societies have [[laws regarding incest]] or social restrictions on closely consanguineous marriages.<ref name="Bittles"/> In societies where it is illegal, consensual adult incest is seen by some as a [[victimless crime]].<ref name="spiegel">{{cite magazine |last=Hipp |first=Dietmar |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,540831,00.html |title=German High Court Takes a Look at Incest |date=11 March 2008 |magazine=Der Spiegel |access-date=12 April 2008}}</ref><ref name= Wolf169>{{cite book |title=Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century |author1-link=Arthur P. Wolf |first1=Arthur P. |last1=Wolf |first2=William H. |last2=Durham |author2-link=William H. Durham |year=2004 |publisher=Stanford University Press |page=169 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OW1nuQxcIQgC&pg=PA169 |isbn=978-0-8047-5141-4}}</ref> Some cultures extend the incest taboo to relatives with no consanguinity, such as [[Milk kinship|milk-siblings]], stepsiblings, and adoptive siblings, albeit sometimes with less intensity.<ref>Encyclopedia of Love in World Religions – Volume 1 – Page 321, Yudit Kornberg Greenberg – 2008</ref><ref>Language and Social Relations – Page 379, Asif Agha – 2007.</ref> Third-degree relatives (such as half-aunt, half-nephew, first cousin) on average have 12.5% common genetic heritage, and sexual relations between them are viewed differently in various cultures, from being discouraged to being socially acceptable.<ref>The Encyclopedia of Genetic Disorders and Birth Defects – Page 101, James Wynbrandt, Mark D. Ludman – 2009.</ref> Children of incestuous relationships have been regarded as [[Legitimacy (family law)|illegitimate]],{{Where|date=February 2024}} and are still so regarded in some societies today. In most cases, the parents did not have the option to marry to remove that status, as incestuous marriages were, and are, normally also prohibited.


A common justification for prohibiting incest is avoiding [[inbreeding]], a collection of [[inbreeding#Genetic disorders|genetic disorders]] suffered by the children of parents with a close [[Coefficient of relationship|genetic relationship]].<ref name=WolfDurham2005 /> Such children are at greater risk of congenital disorders, developmental and physical disability, and death; that risk is proportional to their parents' [[coefficient of relationship]], a measure of how closely the parents are related genetically.<ref name=WolfDurham2005>{{cite book |title=Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century |first1=Arthur P. |last1=Wolf |first2=William H. |last2=Durham |year=2004 |publisher=Stanford University Press |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OW1nuQxcIQgC&pg=PA3 |isbn=978-0-8047-5141-4}}</ref><ref name=Afzal>{{cite journal |last1=Fareed |first1=M |last2=Afzal |first2=M |year=2014 |title=Estimating the inbreeding depression on cognitive behavior: A population based study of child cohort |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=9 |issue=10 |page=e109585 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0109585 |pmid=25313490 |pmc=4196914|bibcode=2014PLoSO...9j9585F |doi-access=free  |issn = 1932-6203}}</ref> However, cultural anthropologists have noted that [[inbreeding avoidance]] cannot form the sole basis for the incest taboo because the boundaries of the incest prohibition vary widely between cultures and not necessarily in ways that maximize the avoidance of inbreeding.<ref name=WolfDurham2005 /><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Schneider | first1 = D. M. | year = 1976 | title = The meaning of incest | journal = The Journal of the Polynesian Society | volume = 85 | issue = 2| pages = 149–169 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = White | first1 = L. A. | year = 1948 | title = The definition and prohibition of incest | journal = American Anthropologist | volume = 50 | issue = 3| pages = 416–435 | doi = 10.1525/aa.1948.50.3.02a00020 | pmid = 18874938 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Schechner | first1 = R | year = 1971 | title = Incest and culture: A reflection on Claude Lévi-Strauss | journal = Psychoanalytic Review | volume = 58 | issue = 4| pages = 563–72 | pmid = 4948055 }}</ref>
A common justification for prohibiting incest is avoiding [[inbreeding]], a collection of [[inbreeding#Genetic disorders|genetic disorders]] suffered by the children of parents with a close [[Coefficient of relationship|genetic relationship]].<ref name=WolfDurham2005 /> Such children are at greater risk of congenital disorders, developmental and physical disability, and death; that risk is proportional to their parents' [[coefficient of relationship]], a measure of how closely the parents are related genetically.<ref name=WolfDurham2005>{{cite book |title=Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century |first1=Arthur P. |last1=Wolf |first2=William H. |last2=Durham |year=2004 |publisher=Stanford University Press |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OW1nuQxcIQgC&pg=PA3 |isbn=978-0-8047-5141-4}}</ref><ref name=Afzal>{{cite journal |last1=Fareed |first1=M |last2=Afzal |first2=M |year=2014 |title=Estimating the inbreeding depression on cognitive behavior: A population based study of child cohort |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=9 |issue=10 |article-number=e109585 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0109585 |pmid=25313490 |pmc=4196914|bibcode=2014PLoSO...9j9585F |doi-access=free  |issn = 1932-6203}}</ref> However, cultural anthropologists have noted that [[inbreeding avoidance]] cannot form the sole basis for the incest taboo because the boundaries of the incest prohibition vary widely between cultures and not necessarily in ways that maximize the avoidance of inbreeding.<ref name=WolfDurham2005 /><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Schneider | first1 = D. M. | year = 1976 | title = The meaning of incest | journal = The Journal of the Polynesian Society | volume = 85 | issue = 2| pages = 149–169 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = White | first1 = L. A. | year = 1948 | title = The definition and prohibition of incest | journal = American Anthropologist | volume = 50 | issue = 3| pages = 416–435 | doi = 10.1525/aa.1948.50.3.02a00020 | pmid = 18874938 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Schechner | first1 = R | year = 1971 | title = Incest and culture: A reflection on Claude Lévi-Strauss | journal = Psychoanalytic Review | volume = 58 | issue = 4| pages = 563–72 | pmid = 4948055 }}</ref>


In some societies, such as those of [[Ancient Egypt]], brother-sister, father-daughter, mother-son, cousin-cousin, aunt-nephew, uncle-niece, and other combinations of relations within a [[royal family]] were married as a means of perpetuating the royal lineage.<ref>[[Maurice Godelier]], Métamorphoses de la parenté, 2004</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://newleftreview.org/?view=2592 |title=New Left Review – Jack Goody: The Labyrinth of Kinship |access-date=24 July 2007}}</ref> Some societies have different views about what constitutes illegal or immoral incest. For example, in [[Samoa]], a man was permitted to marry his older sister, but not his younger sister.<ref>{{cite book |last= Lechte|first= John|date= 24 February 2003|title= Key Contemporary Concepts From Abjection to Zeno's Paradox|publisher= SAGE Publications|page= 82|isbn= 9780761965343}}</ref> However, sexual relations with a first-degree relative (meaning a parent, sibling, or child) were almost universally forbidden.<ref>''The Tapestry of Culture: An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology'', Ninth Ed., Abraham Rosman, Paula G. Rubel, Maxine Weisgrau, 2009, AltaMira Press, p. 101</ref>
In some societies, such as those of [[Ancient Egypt]], brother-sister, father-daughter, mother-son, cousin-cousin, aunt-nephew, uncle-niece, and other combinations of relations within a [[royal family]] were married as a means of perpetuating the royal lineage, or echoing the practices in their creation myths, and were considered normal.<ref>[[Maurice Godelier]], Métamorphoses de la parenté, 2004</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://newleftreview.org/?view=2592 |title=New Left Review – Jack Goody: The Labyrinth of Kinship |access-date=24 July 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Ancient Egyptian Creation Myths and Brother-sister Marriage in the 18th Dynasty and the 19th Dynasty |journal=Studies in Mythology |volume=12 |year=2025 |pages=264–280 |url=http://www.sass.cn/128001/79422.aspx |last1=LAU |first1=Yin Pak Andrew |archive-date=11 October 2025 |access-date=15 September 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251011132357/http://www.sass.cn/128001/79422.aspx |url-status=dead }}</ref> Some societies have different views about what constitutes [[illegal or immoral incest]]. For example, in [[Samoa]], a man was permitted to marry his older sister, but not his younger sister.<ref>{{cite book |last= Lechte|first= John|date= 24 February 2003|title= Key Contemporary Concepts From Abjection to Zeno's Paradox|publisher= SAGE Publications|page= 82|isbn= 978-0-7619-6534-3}}</ref> However, sexual relations with a first-degree relative (meaning a parent, sibling, or child) were almost universally forbidden in connection with multiple cases of disorders and organ failures.<ref>''The Tapestry of Culture: An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology'', Ninth Ed., Abraham Rosman, Paula G. Rubel, Maxine Weisgrau, 2009, AltaMira Press, p. 101</ref>


==Terminology==
==Terminology==
[[File:Table of Consanguinity showing degrees of relationship.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|The number next to each box indicates the degree of relationship relative to the given person.]]
[[File:Table of Consanguinity showing degrees of relationship.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|The number next to each box indicates the degree of relationship relative to the given person.]]


The English word ''[[wikt:incest|incest]]'' is derived from the Latin ''incestus'', which has a general meaning of "impure, unchaste". It was introduced into [[Middle English]], both in the generic Latin sense (preserved throughout the Middle English period)<ref>[[OED]] [[Ancrene Riwle]] (c. 1225) has ''Incest‥is bituȝe sibbe fleschliche'', where either the generic or the narrow sense may be intended. See also [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=incest&searchmode=none inetymonline.comest]</ref> and in the narrow modern sense. The derived adjective ''incestuous'' appears in the 16th century.<ref>''Oxford Concise Dictionary of Etymology'', T. F. Hoad (ed.) (1996), p. 232</ref> Before the Latin term came in, incest was known in [[Old English]] as ''sib-leger'' (from ''sibb'' 'kinship' + ''leger'' 'to lie') or ''mǣġhǣmed'' (from ''mǣġ'' 'kin, parent' + ''hǣmed'' 'sexual intercourse') but in time, both words fell out of use. Terms like ''incester''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wollert |first1=R |title=An analysis of the argument that clinicians under-predict sexual violence in civil commitment cases |date=2001 |pages=171–184 |url=http://www.richardwollert.com/BSLarticle.html |quote=His first criterion was that follow-up research on rapists and extrafamilial molesters should be studied while research on incesters and intrafamilial molesters should be screened out.}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Crowley |first1=Sue |title=Exploring the multiplicity of childhood sexual abuse with a focus on polyincestuous contexts of abuse |journal=Journal of Child Sexual Abuse |date=2002 |volume=10 |issue=4 |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |pages=91–110 |doi=10.1300/J070v10n04_07 |pmid=16221629 |s2cid=10707236 |quote=They also suggested that researchers have created "a false dichotomy" (p. 33) by studying extrafamilial child molesters (eg, those who abuse other families' children) as though they were distinct from intrafamilial child incesters (eg, those who molest children within their own family)}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Caputi |first1=Jane |title=Unthinkable fathering: connecting incest and nuclearism |journal=[[Hypatia (journal)|Hypatia]] |volume=9 |issue=2 |date=2009 |publisher=[[Wiley Online Library]] |pages=102–122 |doi=10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00435.x |jstor=3810172|s2cid=145443764}}</ref> and ''incestual''<ref>{{cite book |last1=L Conyers |first1=James |title=Black Cultures and Race Relations |date=2002 |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] |isbn=9780830415748 |page=115 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l_dukyNja_YC&q=%22%22&pg=PA115}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=University of California |title=American Journal of Psychiatry |date=1945 |page=425 |edition=Volume 101 |quote=Psychoanalytic interpretations of some of the elements of incestuous reactions and a classification of incestuals are proposed.}}</ref> have been used to describe those interested or involved in sexual relations with relatives among humans, while ''inbreeder'' has been used in relation to similar behavior among non-human organisms.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Charlesworth |first1=Deborah |title=Introduction to Plant Population Biology |date=2009 |publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] |page=80}}</ref>
The English word ''[[wikt:incest|incest]]'' is derived from the Latin ''incestus'', which has a general meaning of "impure, unchaste". It was introduced into [[Middle English]], both in the generic Latin sense (preserved throughout the Middle English period)<ref>[[OED]] [[Ancrene Riwle]] (c. 1225) has ''Incest‥is bituȝe sibbe fleschliche'', where either the generic or the narrow sense may be intended. See also [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=incest&searchmode=none inetymonline.comest]</ref> and in the narrow modern sense. The derived adjective ''incestuous'' appears in the 16th century.<ref>''Oxford Concise Dictionary of Etymology'', T. F. Hoad (ed.) (1996), p. 232</ref> Before the Latin term came in, incest was known in [[Old English]] as ''sib-leger'' (from ''sibb'' 'kinship' + ''leger'' 'to lie') or ''mǣġhǣmed'' (from ''mǣġ'' 'kin, parent' + ''hǣmed'' 'sexual intercourse') but in time, both words fell out of use. Terms like ''incester''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wollert |first1=R |title=An analysis of the argument that clinicians under-predict sexual violence in civil commitment cases |date=2001 |pages=171–184 |url=http://www.richardwollert.com/BSLarticle.html |quote=His first criterion was that follow-up research on rapists and extrafamilial molesters should be studied while research on incesters and intrafamilial molesters should be screened out. |archive-date=26 April 2016 |access-date=4 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160426042706/http://www.richardwollert.com/BSLarticle.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Crowley |first1=Sue |title=Exploring the multiplicity of childhood sexual abuse with a focus on polyincestuous contexts of abuse |journal=Journal of Child Sexual Abuse |date=2002 |volume=10 |issue=4 |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |pages=91–110 |doi=10.1300/J070v10n04_07 |pmid=16221629 |s2cid=10707236 |quote=They also suggested that researchers have created "a false dichotomy" (p. 33) by studying extrafamilial child molesters (eg, those who abuse other families' children) as though they were distinct from intrafamilial child incesters (eg, those who molest children within their own family)}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Caputi |first1=Jane |title=Unthinkable fathering: connecting incest and nuclearism |journal=[[Hypatia (journal)|Hypatia]] |volume=9 |issue=2 |date=2009 |publisher=[[Wiley Online Library]] |pages=102–122 |doi=10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00435.x |jstor=3810172|s2cid=145443764}}</ref> and ''incestual''<ref>{{cite book |last1=L Conyers |first1=James |title=Black Cultures and Race Relations |date=2002 |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] |isbn=978-0-8304-1574-8 |page=115 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l_dukyNja_YC&q=%22%22&pg=PA115}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=University of California |title=American Journal of Psychiatry |date=1945 |page=425 |edition=Volume 101 |quote=Psychoanalytic interpretations of some of the elements of incestuous reactions and a classification of incestuals are proposed.}}</ref> have been used to describe those interested or involved in sexual relations with relatives among humans, while ''inbreeder'' has been used in relation to similar behavior among non-human organisms.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Charlesworth |first1=Deborah |title=Introduction to Plant Population Biology |date=2009 |publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] |page=80}}</ref>


==History==
==History==
Line 25: Line 26:
In [[Achaemenid Persia]], marriages between family members, such as half-siblings, nieces and cousins took place but were not seen as incestuous. However, Greek sources state that brother-sister and father-daughter marriages allegedly took place inside the royal family, yet it remains problematic to determine the reliability of these accounts.{{sfn|Brosius|2000}} According to [[Herodotus]], Shah [[Cambyses II]] supposedly married two of his sisters, [[Atossa]] and Roxane.{{sfn|Dandamayev|1990|pp=726–729}}{{sfn|Brosius|2000}} This would have been regarded as illegal. However, Herodotus also states that Cambyses married [[Otanes]]' daughter [[Phaedymia|Phaidyme]], whilst his contemporary [[Ctesias]] names Roxane as Cambyses' wife, but she is not referred to as his sister.{{sfn|Brosius|2000}} The accusations against Cambyses of committing incest are mentioned as part of his "blasphemous actions", which were designed to illustrate his "madness and vanity". These reports all derive from the same Egyptian source that was antagonistic towards Cambyses, and some of these allegations of "crimes", such as the killing of the [[Apis bull]], have been confirmed as false, which means that the report of Cambyses' supposed incestuous acts is questionable.{{sfn|Brosius|2000}}
In [[Achaemenid Persia]], marriages between family members, such as half-siblings, nieces and cousins took place but were not seen as incestuous. However, Greek sources state that brother-sister and father-daughter marriages allegedly took place inside the royal family, yet it remains problematic to determine the reliability of these accounts.{{sfn|Brosius|2000}} According to [[Herodotus]], Shah [[Cambyses II]] supposedly married two of his sisters, [[Atossa]] and Roxane.{{sfn|Dandamayev|1990|pp=726–729}}{{sfn|Brosius|2000}} This would have been regarded as illegal. However, Herodotus also states that Cambyses married [[Otanes]]' daughter [[Phaedymia|Phaidyme]], whilst his contemporary [[Ctesias]] names Roxane as Cambyses' wife, but she is not referred to as his sister.{{sfn|Brosius|2000}} The accusations against Cambyses of committing incest are mentioned as part of his "blasphemous actions", which were designed to illustrate his "madness and vanity". These reports all derive from the same Egyptian source that was antagonistic towards Cambyses, and some of these allegations of "crimes", such as the killing of the [[Apis bull]], have been confirmed as false, which means that the report of Cambyses' supposed incestuous acts is questionable.{{sfn|Brosius|2000}}


Several of the Egyptian [[king]]s married their sisters and had several children with them to continue the royal bloodline. For example, [[Tutankhamun]] married his half-sister [[Ankhesenamun]], and was himself the child of an incestuous union between [[Akhenaten]] and an unidentified sister-wife. Several scholars, such as Frier et al., state that sibling marriages were widespread among all classes in Egypt during the Graeco-Roman period. Numerous [[papyrus|papyri]] and the Roman census declarations attest to many husbands and wives being brother and sister, of the same father and mother.<ref>{{cite book |last=Lewis |first=N. |title=Life in Egypt under Roman Rule |isbn=978-0-19-814848-7 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press|Clarendon Press]] |year=1983 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/lifeinegyptunder0000lewi }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Frier |first1=Bruce W. |last2=Bagnall |first2=Roger S. |author2-link=Roger S. Bagnall |title=The Demography of Roman Egypt |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge, UK |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-521-46123-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Shaw |first=B. D. |title=Explaining Incest: Brother-Sister Marriage in Graeco-Roman Egypt |journal=Man |series=New Series |volume=27 |issue=2 |year=1992 |pages=267–299 |jstor=2804054 |doi=10.2307/2804054}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Hopkins |first=Keith |author-link=Keith Hopkins |year=1980 |title=Brother-Sister Marriage in Roman Egypt |url=http://humweb.ucsc.edu/jklynn/ancientwomen/HopkinsBrotherSisterMarriage.pdf |journal=Comparative Studies in Society and History |volume=22 |pages=303–354 |doi=10.1017/S0010417500009385 |issue=3 |s2cid=143698328 |access-date=21 July 2013 |archive-date=3 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303180202/http://humweb.ucsc.edu/jklynn/ancientwomen/HopkinsBrotherSisterMarriage.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, it has also been argued that the available evidence does not support the view that such relations were common.<ref>Walter Scheidel. 2004. "Ancient Egyptian Sibling Marriage and the Westermarck Effect", in ''Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: the state of knowledge at the turn of the century'' Arthur Wolf and William Durham (eds) Stanford University Press. pp. 93–108</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Huebner | first1 = Sabine R | author-link = Sabine R. Huebner | year = 2007 | title = 'Brother-Sister' Marriage in Roman Egypt: a Curiosity of Humankind or a Widespread Family Strategy?. | journal = The Journal of Roman Studies | volume = 97 | pages = 21–49 | doi = 10.3815/000000007784016070 }}</ref><ref>Huebner, Sabine R. The family in Roman Egypt: a comparative approach to intergenerational solidarity and conflict. Cambridge University Press, 2013.</ref>
Several of the Egyptian [[king]]s married their sisters and had several children with them to continue the royal bloodline. For example, [[Tutankhamun]] married his half-sister [[Ankhesenamun]], and was himself the child of an incestuous union between [[Akhenaten]] and an unidentified sister-wife. Several scholars, such as Frier et al., state that sibling marriages were widespread among all classes in Egypt during the Graeco-Roman period. Numerous [[papyrus|papyri]] and the Roman census declarations attest to many husbands and wives being brother and sister, of the same father and mother.<ref>{{cite book |last=Lewis |first=N. |title=Life in Egypt under Roman Rule |isbn=978-0-19-814848-7 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press|Clarendon Press]] |year=1983 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/lifeinegyptunder0000lewi }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Frier |first1=Bruce W. |last2=Bagnall |first2=Roger S. |author2-link=Roger S. Bagnall |title=The Demography of Roman Egypt |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge, UK |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-521-46123-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Shaw |first=B. D. |title=Explaining Incest: Brother-Sister Marriage in Graeco-Roman Egypt |journal=Man |series=New Series |volume=27 |issue=2 |year=1992 |pages=267–299 |jstor=2804054 |doi=10.2307/2804054}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Hopkins |first=Keith |author-link=Keith Hopkins |year=1980 |title=Brother-Sister Marriage in Roman Egypt |url=http://humweb.ucsc.edu/jklynn/ancientwomen/HopkinsBrotherSisterMarriage.pdf |journal=Comparative Studies in Society and History |volume=22 |pages=303–354 |doi=10.1017/S0010417500009385 |issue=3 |s2cid=143698328 |access-date=21 July 2013 |archive-date=3 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303180202/http://humweb.ucsc.edu/jklynn/ancientwomen/HopkinsBrotherSisterMarriage.pdf }}</ref> However, it has also been argued that the available evidence does not support the view that such relations were common.<ref>Walter Scheidel. 2004. "Ancient Egyptian Sibling Marriage and the Westermarck Effect", in ''Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: the state of knowledge at the turn of the century'' Arthur Wolf and William Durham (eds) Stanford University Press. pp. 93–108</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Huebner | first1 = Sabine R | author-link = Sabine R. Huebner | year = 2007 | title = 'Brother-Sister' Marriage in Roman Egypt: a Curiosity of Humankind or a Widespread Family Strategy?. | journal = The Journal of Roman Studies | volume = 97 | pages = 21–49 | doi = 10.3815/000000007784016070 }}</ref><ref>Huebner, Sabine R. The family in Roman Egypt: a comparative approach to intergenerational solidarity and conflict. Cambridge University Press, 2013.</ref>


The most famous of these relationships were in the [[Ptolemaic dynasty|Ptolemaic royal family]]; [[Cleopatra VII]] was married to two of her younger brothers, [[Ptolemy XIII]] and [[Ptolemy XIV]], whilst her mother and father, [[Cleopatra V of Egypt|Cleopatra V]] and [[Ptolemy XII]], were also brother and sister. [[Arsinoe II]] and her younger brother [[Ptolemy II|Ptolemy II Philadelphus]] were the first in the family to participate in a full-sibling marriage, a departure from custom.<ref name="Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the">{{cite journal |last1=Ager |first1=Sheila L. |title=Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the Ptolemaic Dynasty |journal=The Journal of Hellenic Studies |date=2005 |volume=125 |pages=1–34 |doi=10.1017/S0075426900007084 |jstor=30033343 |pmid=19681234  |issn=0075-4269}}</ref> A union between full siblings was counternormative in Greek and Macedonian tradition, and prohibited by the laws of at least some cities.<ref name="Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the"/><ref name="The Routledge Companion to Women and Monarchy in the Ancient Mediterranean World">{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title= The Routledge Companion to Women and Monarchy in the Ancient Mediterranean World|publisher= Taylor & Francis|date= 9 November 2020|isbn= 9780429783982}}</ref>
The most famous of these relationships were in the [[Ptolemaic dynasty|Ptolemaic royal family]]; [[Cleopatra VII]] was married to two of her younger brothers, [[Ptolemy XIII]] and [[Ptolemy XIV]], whilst her mother and father, [[Cleopatra V of Egypt|Cleopatra V]] and [[Ptolemy XII]], were also brother and sister. [[Arsinoe II]] and her younger brother [[Ptolemy II|Ptolemy II Philadelphus]] were the first in the family to participate in a full-sibling marriage, a departure from custom.<ref name="Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the">{{cite journal |last1=Ager |first1=Sheila L. |title=Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the Ptolemaic Dynasty |journal=The Journal of Hellenic Studies |date=2005 |volume=125 |pages=1–34 |doi=10.1017/S0075426900007084 |jstor=30033343 |pmid=19681234  |issn=0075-4269}}</ref> A union between full siblings was not the norm in Greek and Macedonian tradition, and prohibited by the laws of at least some cities.<ref name="Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the"/><ref name="The Routledge Companion to Women and Monarchy in the Ancient Mediterranean World">{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title= The Routledge Companion to Women and Monarchy in the Ancient Mediterranean World|publisher= Taylor & Francis|date= 9 November 2020|isbn= 978-0-429-78398-2}}</ref>


[[File:Tutankhamun and his wife B. C. 1330.jpg|thumb|Egyptian king [[Tutankhamun]] married his half-sister [[Ankhesenamun]].]]
[[File:Tutankhamun and his wife B. C. 1330.jpg|thumb|Egyptian king [[Tutankhamun]] married his half-sister [[Ankhesenamun]].]]
Line 45: Line 46:
===Biblical references===
===Biblical references===
{{Main|Incest in the Bible}}
{{Main|Incest in the Bible}}
The earliest Biblical reference to possible incest involves Cain. It was cited that he knew his wife and she conceived and bore Enoch.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices|last=Aggrawal|first=Anil|publisher=CRC Press|year=2009|isbn=9781420043082|location=Boca Raton, FL|pages=320}}</ref> A literalist reading of this passage indicates that, during this period, there was no other woman except Eve, or there was an unnamed sister, in which case Cain had an incestuous relationship with his mother or his sister.<ref name=":1" /> According to the [[Book of Jubilees]], [[Cain]] married his sister [[Awan (religious figure)|Awan]].<ref>Cain and Abel in Text and Tradition: Jewish and Christian Interpretations of the First Sibling Rivalry, John Byron – 2011, page 27</ref><ref>The Empowerment of Women in the Book of Jubilees – Page 17, Betsy Halpern Amaru – 1999</ref> Later, in Genesis 20<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible,'' {{bibleverse||Genesis|20:12|HE}}</ref> of the [[Hebrew Bible]], the [[Patriarch]] [[Abraham]] married his half-sister [[Sarah]].{{sfn|Ska|2009|pp=26–31}} Other references include the passage in 2 Samuel 13 where [[Amnon]], King [[David]]'s son, rapes his half-sister [[Tamar (2 Samuel)|Tamar]].<ref>''Bible'', {{bibleverse|2|Samuel|13|NIV}}</ref> According to [[Michael D. Coogan]], it would have been perfectly all right for Amnon to have married her, the Bible being inconsistent about prohibiting incest.<ref>{{cite book|last=Coogan|first=Michael|title=God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says|url=https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog|url-access=registration|quote=god and sex.|access-date=5 May 2011|edition=1st|year=2010|publisher=Twelve. Hachette Book Group|location=New York, Boston|isbn=978-0-446-54525-9|oclc=505927356|pages=[https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog/page/112 112]–113}}</ref>
The earliest Biblical reference to possible incest involves Cain. It was cited that he knew his wife and she conceived and bore Enoch.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices|last=Aggrawal|first=Anil|publisher=CRC Press|year=2009|isbn=978-1-4200-4308-2|location=Boca Raton, FL|page=320}}</ref> A literalist reading of this passage indicates that, during this period, there was no other woman except Eve, or there was an unnamed sister, in which case Cain had an incestuous relationship with his mother or his sister.<ref name=":1" /> According to the [[Book of Jubilees]], [[Cain]] married his sister [[Awan (religious figure)|Awan]].<ref>Cain and Abel in Text and Tradition: Jewish and Christian Interpretations of the First Sibling Rivalry, John Byron – 2011, page 27</ref><ref>The Empowerment of Women in the Book of Jubilees – Page 17, Betsy Halpern Amaru – 1999</ref> Later, in Genesis 20<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible,'' {{bibleverse||Genesis|20:12|HE}}</ref> of the [[Hebrew Bible]], the [[Patriarch]] [[Abraham]] married his half-sister [[Sarah]].{{sfn|Ska|2009|pp=26–31}} Other references include the passage in 2 Samuel 13 where [[Amnon]], King [[David]]'s son, rapes his half-sister [[Tamar (2 Samuel)|Tamar]].<ref>''Bible'', {{bibleverse|2|Samuel|13|NIV}}</ref> According to [[Michael D. Coogan]], it would have been perfectly all right for Amnon to have married her, the Bible being inconsistent about prohibiting incest.<ref>{{cite book|last=Coogan|first=Michael|title=God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says|url=https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog|url-access=registration|quote=god and sex.|access-date=5 May 2011|edition=1st|year=2010|publisher=Twelve. Hachette Book Group|location=New York, Boston|isbn=978-0-446-54525-9|oclc=505927356|pages=[https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog/page/112 112]–113}}</ref>


In Genesis 19:30{{ndash}}38, while living in an isolated area after the destruction of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]], [[Lot (biblical person)|Lot]]'s two daughters conspire to inebriate and rape their father due to the lack of available partners to continue his [[Lineage (anthropology)|line of descent]]. Because of intoxication, Lot "perceived not" when his firstborn, and the following night, his younger, daughter lay with him.<ref>''Bible'', Genesis 19:32–35</ref>
In Genesis 19:30{{ndash}}38, while living in an isolated area after the destruction of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]], [[Lot (biblical person)|Lot]]'s two daughters conspire to inebriate and rape their father due to the lack of available partners to continue his [[Lineage (anthropology)|line of descent]]. Because of intoxication, Lot "perceived not" when his firstborn, and the following night, his younger, daughter lay with him.<ref>''Bible'', Genesis 19:32–35</ref>


Moses was also born of an incestuous marriage. Exodus 6<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'', {{bibleverse||Exodus|6:20|HE}}</ref> details how his father, [[Amram]], was the nephew of his mother, [[Jochebed]].<ref name=":1" /> An account noted that the incestuous relations did not suffer the fate of childlessness, which was the punishment for such couples in Levitical law.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|title=Sex, Marriage, and Family in John Calvin's Geneva: Courtship, Engagement, and Marriage|last1=John|first1=Witte Jr.|last2=Kingdon|first2=Robert|publisher=William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company|year=2005|isbn=9780802848031|location=Grand Rapids|pages=321}}</ref> It stated, however, that the incest exposed Moses "to the peril of wild beasts, of the weather, of the water, and more."<ref name=":2" />
Moses was also born of an incestuous marriage. Exodus 6<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'', {{bibleverse||Exodus|6:20|HE}}</ref> details how his father, [[Amram]], was the nephew of his mother, [[Jochebed]].<ref name=":1" /> An account noted that the incestuous relations did not suffer the fate of childlessness, which was the punishment for such couples in Levitical law.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|title=Sex, Marriage, and Family in John Calvin's Geneva: Courtship, Engagement, and Marriage|last1=John|first1=Witte Jr.|last2=Kingdon|first2=Robert|publisher=William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company|year=2005|isbn=978-0-8028-4803-1|location=Grand Rapids|page=321}}</ref> It stated, however, that the incest exposed Moses "to the peril of wild beasts, of the weather, of the water, and more."<ref name=":2" />


===From the Middle Ages onward===
===From the Middle Ages onward===
Line 71: Line 72:
In some Southeast Asian cultures, stories of incest being common among certain ethnicities are sometimes told as expressions of contempt for those ethnicities.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Edmunds |first1=Lowell |last2=Dundes |first2=Alan |title=Oedipus: A Folklore Casebook |date=1995 |publisher=Univ of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0-299-14853-9 |page=32 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m-3Hyd4ms_YC&q=Kalangs+incest&pg=PA32 |language=en}}</ref>
In some Southeast Asian cultures, stories of incest being common among certain ethnicities are sometimes told as expressions of contempt for those ethnicities.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Edmunds |first1=Lowell |last2=Dundes |first2=Alan |title=Oedipus: A Folklore Casebook |date=1995 |publisher=Univ of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0-299-14853-9 |page=32 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m-3Hyd4ms_YC&q=Kalangs+incest&pg=PA32 |language=en}}</ref>


Marriages between younger brothers and their older sisters were common among the early [[Udege people]].<ref>{{cite book |last= Deusen|first= Kira|date= 2 February 2011|title= Flying Tiger: Women Shamans and Storytellers of the Amur|publisher= McGill Queen's Press|page= 25|isbn= 978-0773521551}}</ref>
Marriages between younger brothers and their older sisters were common among the early [[Udege people]].<ref>{{cite book |last= Deusen|first= Kira|date= 2 February 2011|title= Flying Tiger: Women Shamans and Storytellers of the Amur|publisher= McGill Queen's Press|page= 25|isbn= 978-0-7735-2155-1}}</ref>


==Prevalence and statistics==
==Prevalence and statistics==
Line 87: Line 88:
{{Main|Child sexual abuse}}
{{Main|Child sexual abuse}}


Sex between an adult family member and a child is usually considered a form of child sexual abuse,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Fridell |first=Lorie A. |title=Decision-making of the District Attorney: diverting or prosecuting intrafamilial child sexual abuse offenders |journal=[[Criminal Justice Policy Review]] |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=249–267 |doi=10.1177/088740349000400304 |date=October 1990 |s2cid=145654768 }}</ref> also known as '''child incestuous abuse''',<ref>{{cite web |last=Trusiani|first=Jessica|title=Working with Survivors of Child Incestuous Abuse |website=Rutgers School of Social Work |url=http://socialwork.rutgers.edu/Libraries/VAWC/Trusiani_presentation.sflb.ashx|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141101063712/http://socialwork.rutgers.edu/Libraries/VAWC/Trusiani_presentation.sflb.ashx|archive-date=1 November 2014}}</ref> and for many years has been the most reported form of incest. Father–daughter and stepfather–stepdaughter sex are the most commonly reported forms of adult–child incest, with most of the remaining involving a mother or stepmother.<ref name=Turner>{{cite book |title=Encyclopedia of Relationships Across the Lifespan |last=Turner |first=Jeffrey S. |year=1996 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |page=[https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofre0000turn/page/92 92] |isbn=978-0-313-29576-8 |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofre0000turn/page/92 }}</ref> Many studies found that stepfathers tend to be far more likely than biological fathers to engage in this form of incest. One study of adult women in San Francisco estimated that 17% of women were abused by stepfathers and 2% were abused by biological fathers.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kinnear |first=Karen L. |title=Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Reference Handbook |page=8}}</ref> Father–son incest is reported less often, but it is not known how close the frequency is to heterosexual incest because it is probably more under-reported.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1007/BF00754448|title=Father-son incest: A review and analysis of reported incidents|journal=Clinical Social Work Journal|volume=16|issue=2|pages=165–179|year=1988|last1=Williams|first1=Mark|s2cid=144258944}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1176/ajp.135.7.835|pmid=665796|title=Father-son incest: Underreported psychiatric problem?|journal=American Journal of Psychiatry|volume=135|issue=7|pages=835–838|year=1978|hdl=1811/51174|last1=Dixon|first1=K. N.|last2=Arnold|first2=L. E.|last3=Calestro|first3=K.|citeseerx=10.1.1.1018.8536}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Don't Tell: The Sexual Abuse of Boys |first=Michel |last=Dorais |translator=Isabel Denholm Meyer |year=2002 |page=24 |publisher=McGill-Queen's Press |isbn=978-0-7735-2261-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Healing the Incest Wound: Adult Survivors in Therapy |first=Christine A. |last=Courtois |year=1988 |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |isbn=978-0-393-31356-7}}</ref> The prevalence of incest between parents and their children is difficult to estimate due to secrecy and privacy.
Sex between an adult family member and a child is a form of child sexual abuse,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Fridell |first=Lorie A. |title=Decision-making of the District Attorney: diverting or prosecuting intrafamilial child sexual abuse offenders |journal=[[Criminal Justice Policy Review]] |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=249–267 |doi=10.1177/088740349000400304 |date=October 1990 |s2cid=145654768 }}</ref> also known as '''child incestuous abuse''',<ref>{{cite web |last=Trusiani|first=Jessica|title=Working with Survivors of Child Incestuous Abuse |website=Rutgers School of Social Work |url=http://socialwork.rutgers.edu/Libraries/VAWC/Trusiani_presentation.sflb.ashx|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141101063712/http://socialwork.rutgers.edu/Libraries/VAWC/Trusiani_presentation.sflb.ashx|archive-date=1 November 2014}}</ref> and for many years has been the most reported form of incest. Father–daughter and stepfather–stepdaughter sexual abuse are the most commonly reported forms of adult–child incest, with most of the remaining involving a mother or stepmother.<ref name=Turner>{{cite book |title=Encyclopedia of Relationships Across the Lifespan |last=Turner |first=Jeffrey S. |year=1996 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |page=[https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofre0000turn/page/92 92] |isbn=978-0-313-29576-8 |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofre0000turn/page/92 }}</ref> Many studies found that stepfathers tend to be far more likely than biological fathers to engage in this form of incest. One study of adult women in San Francisco estimated that 17% of women were abused by stepfathers and 2% were abused by biological fathers.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kinnear |first=Karen L. |title=Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Reference Handbook |page=8}}</ref> Father–son incest is reported less often, but it is not known how close the frequency is to heterosexual incest because it is probably more under-reported.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1007/BF00754448|title=Father-son incest: A review and analysis of reported incidents|journal=Clinical Social Work Journal|volume=16|issue=2|pages=165–179|year=1988|last1=Williams|first1=Mark|s2cid=144258944}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1176/ajp.135.7.835|pmid=665796|title=Father-son incest: Underreported psychiatric problem?|journal=American Journal of Psychiatry|volume=135|issue=7|pages=835–838|year=1978|hdl=1811/51174|last1=Dixon|first1=K. N.|last2=Arnold|first2=L. E.|last3=Calestro|first3=K.|citeseerx=10.1.1.1018.8536}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Don't Tell: The Sexual Abuse of Boys |first=Michel |last=Dorais |translator=Isabel Denholm Meyer |year=2002 |page=24 |publisher=McGill-Queen's Press |isbn=978-0-7735-2261-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Healing the Incest Wound: Adult Survivors in Therapy |first=Christine A. |last=Courtois |year=1988 |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |isbn=978-0-393-31356-7}}</ref> The prevalence of incest between parents and their children is difficult to estimate due to the coercive silencing of victims.  


In a 1999 news story, the [[BBC]] reported: "Close-knit family life in India masks an alarming amount of sexual abuse of children and teenage girls by family members, a new report suggests. Delhi organisation [[RAHI Foundation|RAHI]] said 76% of respondents to its survey had been abused when they were children{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} 40% of those by a family member."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lak |first=Daniel |date=22 January 1999 |title=India's hidden incest |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/259959.stm |work=BBC News}}</ref>
In a 1999 news story, the [[BBC]] reported: "Close-knit family life in India masks an alarming amount of sexual abuse of children and teenage girls by family members, a new report suggests. Delhi organisation [[RAHI Foundation|RAHI]] said 76% of respondents to its survey had been abused when they were children{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} 40% of those by a family member."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lak |first=Daniel |date=22 January 1999 |title=India's hidden incest |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/259959.stm |work=BBC News}}</ref>


According to the National Center for Victims of Crime a large proportion of [[rape]] committed in the United States is perpetrated by a family member:
According to the National Center for Victims of Crime a large proportion of [[rape]] committed in the United States is perpetrated by a family member:
{{blockquote|1=Research indicates that 46% of children who are raped are victims of family members (Langan and Harlow, 1994). The majority of American rape victims (61%) are raped before the age of 18; furthermore, 29% of all rapes occurred when the victim was less than 11 years old. 11% of rape victims are raped by their fathers or stepfathers, and another 16% are raped by other relatives.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32360|title=Incest|work=National Center for Victims of Crime and Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center|year=1992|publisher=National Center for Victims of Crime|access-date=27 March 2008|archive-date=10 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200810214920/http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32360|url-status=dead}}</ref>}}
{{blockquote|1=Research indicates that 46% of children who are raped are victims of family members (Langan and Harlow, 1994). The majority of American rape victims (61%) are raped before the age of 18; furthermore, 29% of all rapes occurred when the victim was less than 11 years old. 11% of rape victims are raped by their fathers or stepfathers, and another 16% are raped by other relatives.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32360|title=Incest|work=National Center for Victims of Crime and Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center|year=1992|publisher=National Center for Victims of Crime|access-date=27 March 2008|archive-date=10 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200810214920/http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32360}}</ref>}}


Adults who as children were incestuously victimized by adults often suffer from low [[self-esteem]], difficulties in interpersonal relationships, and [[sexual dysfunction]], and are at an extremely high risk of many mental disorders, including [[Clinical depression|depression]], [[anxiety disorder]]s, [[Phobia|phobic avoidance reactions]], [[somatoform disorder]], [[substance abuse]], [[borderline personality disorder]], and [[complex post-traumatic stress disorder]].<ref name="Courtois" /><ref>{{cite book |last2=Barrett |first2=Mary Jo |title=Systemic Treatment of Incest: A Therapeutic Handbook |last1=Trepper |first1=Terry S. |publisher=Psychology Press |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-87630-560-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Incest-Related Syndromes of Adult Psychopathology |first=Richard P. |last=Kluft |year=1990 |publisher=American Psychiatric Pub, Inc. |pages=83, 89 |isbn=978-0-88048-160-1}}</ref>
Adults who as children were incestuously victimized by adults often suffer from low [[self-esteem]], difficulties in interpersonal relationships, and [[sexual dysfunction]], and are at an extremely high risk of many [[mental disorder]]s, including [[Clinical depression|depression]], [[anxiety disorder]]s, [[Phobia|phobic avoidance reactions]], [[somatoform disorder]], [[substance abuse]], [[borderline personality disorder]], and [[complex post-traumatic stress disorder]].<ref name="Courtois" /><ref>{{cite book |last2=Barrett |first2=Mary Jo |title=Systemic Treatment of Incest: A Therapeutic Handbook |last1=Trepper |first1=Terry S. |publisher=Psychology Press |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-87630-560-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Incest-Related Syndromes of Adult Psychopathology |first=Richard P. |last=Kluft |year=1990 |publisher=American Psychiatric Pub, Inc. |pages=83, 89 |isbn=978-0-88048-160-1}}</ref>


The [[Goler clan]] in [[Nova Scotia]] is a specific instance in which child sexual abuse in the form of forced adult{{ndash}}child and sibling{{ndash}}sibling incest took place over at least three generations.<ref name="cruise">{{Cite book |title=On South Mountain: The Dark Secrets of the Goler Clan |last1=Cruise |first1=David |last2=Griffiths |first2=Alison |publisher=Penguin Books |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-670-87388-3}}</ref> A number of Goler children were victims of sexual abuse at the hands of fathers, mothers, uncles, aunts, sisters, brothers, cousins, and each other. During interrogation by police, several of the adults openly admitted to engaging in many forms of sexual activity, up to and including full intercourse, multiple times with the children. Sixteen adults (both men and women) were charged with hundreds of allegations of incest and sexual abuse of children as young as five.<ref name="cruise" /> In July 2012, twelve children were removed from the [[Colt clan incest case|'Colt' family]] (a pseudonym) in [[New South Wales]], Australia, after the discovery of four generations of incest.<ref name=ccnsw>{{cite web|url=http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=167373 |title=DFaCS (NSW) and the Colt Children [2013] NSWChC 5 |publisher=Children's Court, New South Wales |date=13 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217044158/http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=167373 |archive-date=17 December 2013 }}</ref><ref name=nca131210>{{cite news |url=http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/the-case-of-incest-and-depravity-which-came-to-rest-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnixwvgh-1226780575248 |title=The case of incest and depravity which came to rest in the hills of a quiet country town |first=Candace |last=Sutton |work=[[News Corp Australia]] |date=10 December 2013 |access-date=14 December 2013 |archive-date=8 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161108041054/http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/the-case-of-incest-and-depravity-which-came-to-rest-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnixwvgh-1226780575248 }}</ref> Child protection workers and psychologists said interviews with the children indicated "a virtual sexual free-for-all".<ref name=nca131212>{{cite news |url=http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/the-family-tree-of-the-depraved-family-who-live-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnii5s3x-1226781805877 |title=The family tree of the depraved family who live in the hills of a quiet country town |first=Candace |last=Sutton |work=[[News Corp Australia]] |date=12 December 2013 |access-date=14 December 2013 |archive-date=25 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160925061616/http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/the-family-tree-of-the-depraved-family-who-live-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnii5s3x-1226781805877 }}</ref>
The [[Goler clan]] in [[Nova Scotia]] is a specific instance in which child sexual abuse in the form of forced adult{{ndash}}child and sibling{{ndash}}sibling incest took place over at least three generations.<ref name="cruise">{{Cite book |title=On South Mountain: The Dark Secrets of the Goler Clan |last1=Cruise |first1=David |last2=Griffiths |first2=Alison |publisher=Penguin Books |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-670-87388-3}}</ref> A number of Goler children were victims of sexual abuse at the hands of fathers, mothers, uncles, aunts, sisters, brothers, cousins, and each other. During interrogation by police, several of the adults openly admitted to engaging in many forms of sexual activity, up to and including full intercourse, multiple times with the children. Sixteen adults (both men and women) were charged with hundreds of allegations of incest and sexual abuse of children as young as five.<ref name="cruise" /> In July 2012, twelve children were removed from the [[Colt clan incest case|'Colt' family]] (a pseudonym) in [[New South Wales]], Australia, after the discovery of four generations of incest.<ref name=ccnsw>{{cite web|url=http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=167373 |title=DFaCS (NSW) and the Colt Children [2013] NSWChC 5 |publisher=Children's Court, New South Wales |date=13 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217044158/http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=167373 |archive-date=17 December 2013 }}</ref><ref name=nca131210>{{cite news |url=http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/the-case-of-incest-and-depravity-which-came-to-rest-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnixwvgh-1226780575248 |title=The case of incest and depravity which came to rest in the hills of a quiet country town |first=Candace |last=Sutton |work=[[News Corp Australia]] |date=10 December 2013 |access-date=14 December 2013 |archive-date=8 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161108041054/http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/the-case-of-incest-and-depravity-which-came-to-rest-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnixwvgh-1226780575248 }}</ref> Child protection workers and psychologists said interviews with the children indicated "a virtual sexual free-for-all".<ref name=nca131212>{{cite news |url=http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/the-family-tree-of-the-depraved-family-who-live-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnii5s3x-1226781805877 |title=The family tree of the depraved family who live in the hills of a quiet country town |first=Candace |last=Sutton |work=[[News Corp Australia]] |date=12 December 2013 |access-date=14 December 2013 |archive-date=25 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160925061616/http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/the-family-tree-of-the-depraved-family-who-live-in-the-hills-of-a-quiet-country-town/story-fnii5s3x-1226781805877 }}</ref>
Line 106: Line 107:


===Between adults===
===Between adults===
Proponents of incest between consenting adults draw clear boundaries between the behavior of consenting adults on one hand and rape, child molestation, and abusive incest on the other.<ref name="guardian2002">{{cite news |last=Hari |first=Johann |date=9 January 2002 |title=Forbidden love |url=https://www.theguardian.com/Archive/Article/0,4273,4331603,00.html |access-date=11 April 2008 |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> However, even consensual relationships such as these are still legally classified as incest<ref>{{cite book |author=Roffee |first=James |title=Rape Justice: Beyond the Criminal Law |year=2015 |isbn=9781137476159 |pages=72–91 |chapter=When Yes Actually Means Yes |doi=10.1057/9781137476159_5}}</ref> and criminalized in many jurisdictions (although there are [[Legality of incest|certain exceptions]]). James Roffee, a senior lecturer in criminology at [[Monash University]] and former worker on legal responses to familial sexual activity in England and Wales, and Scotland<ref>{{cite web|url=http://monash.edu/research/explore/en/persons/james-roffee(896c15d7-6f28-4bf0-8a0f-b7d6ff1553e0).html|title=Dr James Roffee|publisher=Monash university|access-date=22 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204003059/http://monash.edu/research/explore/en/persons/james-roffee%28896c15d7-6f28-4bf0-8a0f-b7d6ff1553e0%29.html|archive-date=4 February 2017}}</ref> discussed how the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] deems all familial sexual acts to be criminal, even if all parties give their full consent and are knowledgeable to all possible consequences.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1093/hrlr/ngu023|title=No Consensus on Incest? Criminalisation and Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights|journal=Human Rights Law Review|volume=14|issue=3|pages=541–572|year=2014|last1=Roffee|first1=J. A.}}</ref> He also argues that the use of particular language tools in the legislation manipulates the reader to deem all familial sexual activities as immoral and criminal, even if all parties are consenting adults.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Roffee |first=J.A. |year=2014 |title=Synthetic Necessary Truth Behind New Labour's Criminalisation of Incest |journal=Social & Legal Studies |volume=23 |pages=113–130 |doi=10.1177/0964663913502068 |s2cid=145292798}}</ref>
Proponents of incest between consenting adults draw clear boundaries between the behavior of consenting adults on one hand and rape, child molestation, and abusive incest on the other.<ref name="guardian2002">{{cite news |last=Hari |first=Johann |date=9 January 2002 |title=Forbidden love |url=https://www.theguardian.com/Archive/Article/0,4273,4331603,00.html |access-date=11 April 2008 |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> However, even consensual relationships such as these are still legally classified as incest<ref>{{cite book |author=Roffee |first=James |title=Rape Justice: Beyond the Criminal Law |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-137-47615-9 |pages=72–91 |chapter=When Yes Actually Means Yes |doi=10.1057/9781137476159_5}}</ref> and criminalized in many jurisdictions (although there are [[Legality of incest|certain exceptions]]). James Roffee, a senior lecturer in criminology at [[Monash University]] and former worker on legal responses to familial sexual activity in England and Wales, and Scotland<ref>{{cite web|url=http://monash.edu/research/explore/en/persons/james-roffee(896c15d7-6f28-4bf0-8a0f-b7d6ff1553e0).html|title=Dr James Roffee|publisher=Monash university|access-date=22 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204003059/http://monash.edu/research/explore/en/persons/james-roffee%28896c15d7-6f28-4bf0-8a0f-b7d6ff1553e0%29.html|archive-date=4 February 2017}}</ref> discussed how the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] deems all familial sexual acts to be criminal, even if all parties give their full consent and are knowledgeable to all possible consequences.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1093/hrlr/ngu023|title=No Consensus on Incest? Criminalisation and Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights|journal=Human Rights Law Review|volume=14|issue=3|pages=541–572|year=2014|last1=Roffee|first1=J. A.}}</ref> He also argues that the use of particular language tools in the legislation manipulates the reader to deem all familial sexual activities as immoral and criminal, even if all parties are consenting adults.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Roffee |first=J.A. |year=2014 |title=Synthetic Necessary Truth Behind New Labour's Criminalisation of Incest |journal=Social & Legal Studies |volume=23 |pages=113–130 |doi=10.1177/0964663913502068 |s2cid=145292798}}</ref>
====Aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, nieces, or nephews====
====Aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, nieces, or nephews====
{{see also|Avunculate marriage}}
{{see also|Avunculate marriage}}
In the [[Netherlands]], marrying one's nephew or niece is legal, but only with the explicit permission of the Dutch government, due to the possible risk of [[genetic defects]] among the offspring. Nephew-niece marriages predominantly occur among foreign immigrants. In November 2008, the Scientific Institute of the Christian Democratic Party (CDA) announced that it wanted a ban on marriages to nephews and nieces.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/11/gates-of-vienna-news-feed-11262008.html|title=Gates of Vienna News Feed 11/26/2008|first=Baron|last=Bodissey|date=26 November 2008}}</ref> Consensual sex between individuals aged 18 and older is always lawful in the Netherlands and Belgium, even among closely related family members. Sexual acts between an adult family member and a minor are illegal, though they are classified not as incest but as abuse of the authority such an adult has over a minor, comparable to that of a teacher, coach, or priest.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elfri.be/incest-strafbaar |title=is incest strafbaar ? &#124; Goede raad is goud waard – Advocatenkantoor Elfri De Neve |publisher=Elfri.be |date=15 July 2009 |access-date=30 July 2013|language=nl}}</ref> In [[Florida]], consensual adult sexual intercourse with someone known to be one's aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew constitutes a felony of the third degree.<ref>Criminal Law – Page 200, John M. Scheb – 2008</ref> Other states also commonly prohibit marriages between such kin.<ref>Family Law in the USA – Page 207, Lynn Dennis Wardle, Laurence C. Nolan – 2011</ref> The legality of sex with a half-aunt or half-uncle varies state by state.<ref>The Encyclopedia of Genetic Disorders and Birth Defects – Page 101, James Wynbrandt, Mark D. Ludman – 2010</ref> In the United Kingdom, incest includes only sexual intercourse with a parent, grandparent, child, or sibling,<ref>{{cite web|title=Incest by a man.|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/4-5/69/part/I/crossheading/incest|work=Sexual Offences Act 1956|publisher=National Archives UK|access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref> but the more recently introduced offense of "sex with an adult relative" extends as far as half-siblings, uncles, aunts, nephews, and nieces.<ref name=ref1>{{cite web|title=Sexual Offences Act 2003|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/64|work=legislation.gov.uk|publisher=The National Archives of United Kingdom|access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref> However, the term 'incest' remains widely used in popular culture to describe any form of sexual activity with a relative. In Canada, marriage between uncles and nieces and between aunts and nephews is illegal.{{Citation needed|date=April 2025}}
Consensual sex between individuals aged 18 and older is always lawful in the Netherlands and Belgium, even among closely related family members. Sexual acts between an adult family member and a minor are illegal, though they are classified not as incest but as abuse of the authority such an adult has over a minor, comparable to that of a teacher, coach, or priest.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elfri.be/incest-strafbaar |title=is incest strafbaar ? &#124; Goede raad is goud waard – Advocatenkantoor Elfri De Neve |publisher=Elfri.be |date=15 July 2009 |access-date=30 July 2013|language=nl}}</ref> In [[Florida]], consensual adult sexual intercourse with someone known to be one's aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew constitutes a felony of the third degree.<ref>Criminal Law – Page 200, John M. Scheb – 2008</ref> Other states also commonly prohibit marriages between such kin.<ref>Family Law in the USA – Page 207, Lynn Dennis Wardle, Laurence C. Nolan – 2011</ref> The legality of sex with a half-aunt or half-uncle varies state by state.<ref>The Encyclopedia of Genetic Disorders and Birth Defects – Page 101, James Wynbrandt, Mark D. Ludman – 2010</ref> In the United Kingdom, incest includes only sexual intercourse with a parent, grandparent, child, or sibling,<ref>{{cite web|title=Incest by a man.|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/4-5/69/part/I/crossheading/incest|work=Sexual Offences Act 1956|publisher=National Archives UK|access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref> but the more recently introduced offense of "sex with an adult relative" extends as far as half-siblings, uncles, aunts, nephews, and nieces.<ref name=ref1>{{cite web|title=Sexual Offences Act 2003|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/64|work=legislation.gov.uk|publisher=The National Archives of United Kingdom|access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref> However, the term 'incest' remains widely used in popular culture to describe any form of sexual activity with a relative. In Canada, marriage between uncles and nieces and between aunts and nephews is illegal.{{Citation needed|date=April 2025}}


====Between adult siblings====
====Between adult siblings====
Line 125: Line 126:
The United Kingdom permits both marriage and sexual relations between first cousins.<ref name=Ref1>{{cite web |last=Boseley |first=Sarah |title=Marriage between first cousins doubles risk of birth defects, say researchers |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/04/marriage-first-cousins-birth-defects |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=28 March 2014 |date=4 July 2013}}</ref>
The United Kingdom permits both marriage and sexual relations between first cousins.<ref name=Ref1>{{cite web |last=Boseley |first=Sarah |title=Marriage between first cousins doubles risk of birth defects, say researchers |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/04/marriage-first-cousins-birth-defects |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=28 March 2014 |date=4 July 2013}}</ref>


In some non-Western societies, marriages between close biological relatives account for 20{{ndash}}60% of all marriages.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.larasig.com/node/2020|title=Consanguinity Fact Sheet – Debunking Common Myths|access-date=23 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171223160732/https://www.larasig.com/node/2020|archive-date=23 December 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t2XgDgAAQBAJ&q=20+to+60+%25+of+all+marriages+between+close+biological+relatives&pg=PT282|title=Family Law: Theoretical, Comparative, and Social Science Perspectives|first=James|last=Dwyer|date=9 December 2014|publisher=Wolters Kluwer Law & Business|via=Google Books|isbn=9781454831556}}</ref><ref>"In some parts of the world 20–60% of all marriages are between close biological relatives (Bittles, 1998)"
In some non-Western societies, marriages between close biological relatives account for 20{{ndash}}60% of all marriages.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.larasig.com/node/2020|title=Consanguinity Fact Sheet – Debunking Common Myths|access-date=23 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171223160732/https://www.larasig.com/node/2020|archive-date=23 December 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t2XgDgAAQBAJ&q=20+to+60+%25+of+all+marriages+between+close+biological+relatives&pg=PT282|title=Family Law: Theoretical, Comparative, and Social Science Perspectives|first=James|last=Dwyer|date=9 December 2014|publisher=Wolters Kluwer Law & Business|via=Google Books|isbn=978-1-4548-3155-6}}</ref><ref>"In some parts of the world 20–60% of all marriages are between close biological relatives (Bittles, 1998)"
  [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alan_Bittles/publication/226985985_Genetic_Counseling_and_Screening_of_Consanguineous_Couples_and_Their_Offspring_Recommendations_of_the_National_Society_of_Genetic_Counselors/links/0c960528ac23292963000000.pdf Genetic Counseling and Screening of Consanguineous Couples and Their Offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors]</ref>
  [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alan_Bittles/publication/226985985_Genetic_Counseling_and_Screening_of_Consanguineous_Couples_and_Their_Offspring_Recommendations_of_the_National_Society_of_Genetic_Counselors/links/0c960528ac23292963000000.pdf Genetic Counseling and Screening of Consanguineous Couples and Their Offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors]</ref>


Line 131: Line 132:
[[File:Cousin_marriage_map_USA.svg|thumb|300x300px|'''Laws regarding first-cousin marriage in the States'''{{legend|#000099|Legal}}{{legend|#0066ff|Allowed with requirements}}{{legend|#ff7777|Banned with exceptions<sup>1</sup>}}{{legend|#FF0000|Statute bans  marriage<sup>1</sup>}}{{legend|#990000|Criminal offense<sup>1</sup>}}
[[File:Cousin_marriage_map_USA.svg|thumb|300x300px|'''Laws regarding first-cousin marriage in the States'''{{legend|#000099|Legal}}{{legend|#0066ff|Allowed with requirements}}{{legend|#ff7777|Banned with exceptions<sup>1</sup>}}{{legend|#FF0000|Statute bans  marriage<sup>1</sup>}}{{legend|#990000|Criminal offense<sup>1</sup>}}
----[[Marriage in the United States#Interjurisdictional recognition|<sup>1</sup> Some states recognize marriages]] performed elsewhere, while other states do not.]]
----[[Marriage in the United States#Interjurisdictional recognition|<sup>1</sup> Some states recognize marriages]] performed elsewhere, while other states do not.]]
There are some cultures in Asia which stigmatize cousin marriage, in some instances even marriages between second cousins or more remotely related people. This is notably true in the culture of [[Korea]]. In South Korea, before 1997, two people with the same last name and clan were prohibited from marrying. In light of this law being held unconstitutional, South Korea now only prohibits up to third cousins (see [[Article 809 of the Korean Civil Code]]). [[Hmong people|Hmong]] culture prohibits the marriage of anyone with the same last name{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} to do so would result in being shunned by the entire community, and they are usually stripped of their last name.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kgaGCwAAQBAJ&q=Hmong+culture+prohibits+the+marriage+of+anyone+with+the+same+last+name&pg=PA192|title=Hmong Refugees in the New World: Culture, Community and Opportunity|last=Vang|first=Christopher Thao|date=16 May 2016|publisher=McFarland|isbn=9781476622620}}</ref>
There are some cultures in Asia which stigmatize cousin marriage, in some instances even marriages between second cousins or more remotely related people. This is notably true in the culture of [[Korea]]. In South Korea, before 1997, two people with the same last name and clan were prohibited from marrying. In light of this law being held unconstitutional, South Korea now only prohibits up to third cousins (see [[Article 809 of the Korean Civil Code]]). [[Hmong people|Hmong]] culture prohibits the marriage of anyone with the same last name{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} to do so would result in being shunned by the entire community, and they are usually stripped of their last name.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kgaGCwAAQBAJ&q=Hmong+culture+prohibits+the+marriage+of+anyone+with+the+same+last+name&pg=PA192|title=Hmong Refugees in the New World: Culture, Community and Opportunity|last=Vang|first=Christopher Thao|date=16 May 2016|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-1-4766-2262-0}}</ref>


In a review of 48 studies of children parented by cousins, the rate of birth defects was twice that of non-related couples: 4% for cousin couples as opposed to 2% for the general population.<ref>{{cite news |last=Towie |first=Narelle |url=http://www.perthnow.com.au/kissing-cousins-ok/story-fna7dq6e-1111116504749 |title=Most babies born to first-cousins are healthy |newspaper=Perth Now |date=31 May 2008 |access-date=5 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120202060753/http://www.perthnow.com.au/kissing-cousins-ok/story-fna7dq6e-1111116504749 |archive-date=2 February 2012 }}</ref>
In a review of 48 studies of children parented by cousins, the rate of birth defects was twice that of non-related couples: 4% for cousin couples as opposed to 2% for the general population.<ref>{{cite news |last=Towie |first=Narelle |url=http://www.perthnow.com.au/kissing-cousins-ok/story-fna7dq6e-1111116504749 |title=Most babies born to first-cousins are healthy |newspaper=Perth Now |date=31 May 2008 |access-date=5 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120202060753/http://www.perthnow.com.au/kissing-cousins-ok/story-fna7dq6e-1111116504749 |archive-date=2 February 2012 }}</ref>
Line 138: Line 139:
Some cultures include relatives by marriage in incest prohibitions; these relationships are called [[Affinity (law)|affinity]] rather than [[consanguinity]]. For example, the question of the legality and morality of a widower who wished to marry his [[Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907|deceased wife's sister]] was the subject of long and fierce debate in the [[United Kingdom]] in the 19th century, involving, among others, [[Matthew Boulton]]<ref>{{cite book |last=Pollak |first=Ellen |title=Incest and the English Novel, 1684–1814 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore MD |year=2003 |page=38 |isbn=978-0-8018-7204-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Tann |first=Jennifer |title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford, England |date=May 2007 |chapter=Boulton, Matthew (1728–1809)|title-link=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography }}</ref> and [[Charles La Trobe]]. The marriages were entered into in Scotland and Switzerland respectively, where they were legal. In medieval Europe, [[Lateran IV]] ruled that standing as a [[godparent]] to a child also created a bond of affinity; which precluded legal marriage.<ref name="b310">{{cite book | last1=Ferraro | first1=J.M. | last2=Pedersen | first2=F. | title=A Cultural History of Marriage in the Medieval Age | publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing | series=The Cultural Histories Series | year=2021 | isbn=978-1-350-17971-4 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bqVQEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA133 | access-date=2024-08-23 | page=133}}</ref> But in other societies, a deceased spouse's sibling was considered the ideal person to marry. The Hebrew Bible forbids a man from marrying his brother's widow with the exception that, if his brother dies childless, the man is required to marry his brother's widow so as to "raise up seed to him".<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'' {{bibleverse||Deuteronomy|25:5–6|HE}}</ref> Some societies have long practiced [[sororal polygyny]], a form of [[polygamy]] in which a man marries multiple wives who are sisters to each other (though not closely related to him).{{Citation needed|date=April 2025}}
Some cultures include relatives by marriage in incest prohibitions; these relationships are called [[Affinity (law)|affinity]] rather than [[consanguinity]]. For example, the question of the legality and morality of a widower who wished to marry his [[Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907|deceased wife's sister]] was the subject of long and fierce debate in the [[United Kingdom]] in the 19th century, involving, among others, [[Matthew Boulton]]<ref>{{cite book |last=Pollak |first=Ellen |title=Incest and the English Novel, 1684–1814 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore MD |year=2003 |page=38 |isbn=978-0-8018-7204-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Tann |first=Jennifer |title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford, England |date=May 2007 |chapter=Boulton, Matthew (1728–1809)|title-link=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography }}</ref> and [[Charles La Trobe]]. The marriages were entered into in Scotland and Switzerland respectively, where they were legal. In medieval Europe, [[Lateran IV]] ruled that standing as a [[godparent]] to a child also created a bond of affinity; which precluded legal marriage.<ref name="b310">{{cite book | last1=Ferraro | first1=J.M. | last2=Pedersen | first2=F. | title=A Cultural History of Marriage in the Medieval Age | publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing | series=The Cultural Histories Series | year=2021 | isbn=978-1-350-17971-4 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bqVQEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA133 | access-date=2024-08-23 | page=133}}</ref> But in other societies, a deceased spouse's sibling was considered the ideal person to marry. The Hebrew Bible forbids a man from marrying his brother's widow with the exception that, if his brother dies childless, the man is required to marry his brother's widow so as to "raise up seed to him".<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'' {{bibleverse||Deuteronomy|25:5–6|HE}}</ref> Some societies have long practiced [[sororal polygyny]], a form of [[polygamy]] in which a man marries multiple wives who are sisters to each other (though not closely related to him).{{Citation needed|date=April 2025}}


In Islamic law, marriage among close blood relations like parents, stepparents, parents in-law, siblings, stepsiblings, the children of siblings, aunts, and uncles is forbidden, while first or second cousins may marry. Marrying the widow of a brother or the sister of a deceased or divorced wife is also allowed.{{Citation needed|date=April 2025}}
In Islamic law, marriage among close blood relations like parents, stepparents, parents in-law, siblings, stepsiblings, the children of siblings, aunts, and uncles is forbidden, while first or second cousins may marry.<ref name="Tucker_IslamicLaw">{{cite book |last=Tucker |first=Judith E. |title=Women, Family, and Gender in Islamic Law |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0521537476 |pages=41–42}}</ref> Marrying the widow of a brother or the sister of a deceased or divorced wife is also allowed.<ref name="Tucker_IslamicLaw" />


==Inbreeding==
==Inbreeding==
{{Main|Inbreeding}}
{{Main|Inbreeding}}
Offspring of biologically related parents are subject to the possible impact of inbreeding. Such offspring have a higher possibility of [[Congenital disorder|congenital birth defects]] (see [[Coefficient of relationship]]), because it increases the proportion of zygotes that are [[homozygous]] for deleterious [[recessive allele]]s that produce such disorders<ref>{{cite journal |last=Livingstone |first=F. B. |year=1969 |title=Genetics, Ecology, and the Origins of Incest and Exogamy |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=10 |pages=45–62 |doi=10.1086/201009|s2cid=84009643 }}</ref> (see [[Inbreeding depression]]). Because most such [[allele]]s are rare in populations, it is unlikely that two unrelated marriage partners will both be heterozygous carriers. However, because close relatives [[Coefficient of relationship|share a large fraction of their alleles]], the probability that any such rare deleterious allele present in the common ancestor will be inherited from both related parents is increased dramatically with respect to non-inbred couples. Contrary to common belief, inbreeding does not in itself alter allele frequencies, but rather increases the relative proportion of homozygotes to heterozygotes. This has two contrary effects:<ref>{{cite book |last=Thornhill |first=Nancy Wilmsen |title=The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]] |location=Chicago |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-226-79854-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZFXYeHxwD10C}}</ref>
Offspring of biologically related parents are subject to the possible impact of inbreeding. Such offspring have a higher possibility of [[Congenital disorder|congenital birth defects]] (see [[Coefficient of relationship]]), because it increases the proportion of zygotes that are [[homozygous]] for deleterious [[recessive allele]]s that produce such disorders<ref>{{cite journal |last=Livingstone |first=F. B. |year=1969 |title=Genetics, Ecology, and the Origins of Incest and Exogamy |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=10 |pages=45–62 |doi=10.1086/201009|s2cid=84009643 }}</ref> (see [[Inbreeding depression]]). Because most such [[allele]]s are rare in populations, it is unlikely that two unrelated marriage partners will both be heterozygous carriers. However, because close relatives [[Coefficient of relationship|share a large fraction of their alleles]], the probability that any such rare deleterious allele present in the common ancestor will be inherited from both related parents is increased dramatically with respect to non-inbred couples. Contrary to common belief, inbreeding does not in itself alter allele frequencies, but rather increases the relative proportion of homozygotes to heterozygotes. This has two contrary effects:<ref>{{cite book |last=Thornhill |first=Nancy Wilmsen |title=The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]] |location=Chicago |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-226-79854-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZFXYeHxwD10C}}</ref>
* In the short term, because incestuous reproduction increases [[zygosity]], deleterious recessive alleles will express themselves more frequently, leading to increases in [[Miscarriage|spontaneous abortions]] of zygotes, perinatal deaths, and postnatal offspring with birth defects.
* In the short term, because incestuous reproduction increases [[zygosity]], deleterious recessive alleles will express themselves more frequently, leading to increases in [[Miscarriage|spontaneous abortions]] of zygotes, perinatal deaths, and postnatal offspring with birth defects.
* In the long run, however, because of this increased exposure of deleterious recessive alleles to [[natural selection]], their frequency decreases more rapidly in inbred population, leading to a "healthier" population (with fewer deleterious recessive alleles).
* In the long run, however, because of this increased exposure of deleterious recessive alleles to [[natural selection]], their frequency decreases more rapidly in inbred population, leading to a "healthier" population (with fewer deleterious recessive alleles).
The closer the relationship between two persons, the higher the zygosity, and thus the more severe the biological costs of inbreeding. This fact probably explains why inbreeding between close relatives, such as siblings, is less common than inbreeding between cousins.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Antfolk |first1=Jan |last2=Lieberman |first2=Debra |last3=Santtila |first3=Pekka |title=Fitness Costs Predict Inbreeding Aversion Irrespective of Self-Involvement: Support for Hypotheses Derived from Evolutionary Theory |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=7 |issue=11 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0050613 |pages=e50613 |pmid=23209792 |pmc=3509093|year=2012 |bibcode=2012PLoSO...750613A |doi-access=free }}</ref>
The closer the relationship between two persons, the higher the zygosity, and thus the more severe the biological costs of inbreeding. This fact probably explains why inbreeding between close relatives, such as siblings, is less common than inbreeding between cousins.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Antfolk |first1=Jan |last2=Lieberman |first2=Debra |last3=Santtila |first3=Pekka |title=Fitness Costs Predict Inbreeding Aversion Irrespective of Self-Involvement: Support for Hypotheses Derived from Evolutionary Theory |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=7 |issue=11 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0050613 |article-number=e50613 |pmid=23209792 |pmc=3509093|year=2012 |bibcode=2012PLoSO...750613A |doi-access=free }}</ref>


There may also be other deleterious effects besides those caused by recessive diseases. Thus, similar [[immune system]]s may be more vulnerable to infectious diseases (see [[Major histocompatibility complex and sexual selection]]).<ref name=moral>{{Cite journal |last1=Lieberman |first1=D. |last2=Tooby |first2=J. |last3=Cosmides |first3=L. |doi=10.1098/rspb.2002.2290 |title=Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=270 |issue=1517 |pages=819–826 |year=2003 |pmid= 12737660|pmc=1691313}}</ref>
There may also be other deleterious effects besides those caused by recessive diseases. Thus, similar [[immune system]]s may be more vulnerable to infectious diseases (see [[Major histocompatibility complex and sexual selection]]).<ref name=moral>{{Cite journal |last1=Lieberman |first1=D. |last2=Tooby |first2=J. |last3=Cosmides |first3=L. |doi=10.1098/rspb.2002.2290 |title=Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=270 |issue=1517 |pages=819–826 |year=2003 |pmid= 12737660|pmc=1691313}}</ref>
Line 154: Line 156:
{{Main|Legality of incest}}
{{Main|Legality of incest}}


Laws regarding sexual activity between close relatives vary considerably between jurisdictions, and depend on the type of sexual activity and the nature of the family relationship of the parties involved, as well as the age and sex of the parties. Prohibition of incest laws may extend to restrictions on marriage rights, which also vary between jurisdictions. Most jurisdictions prohibit parent{{ndash}}child and sibling marriages, while others also prohibit first-cousin and uncle{{ndash}}niece and aunt{{ndash}}nephew marriages. In most places, incest is illegal, regardless of the ages of the two partners. In other countries, incestuous relationships between consenting adults (with the age varying by location) are permitted, including in the [[Netherlands]], [[France]], [[Slovenia]], and [[Spain]]. [[Sweden]] is the only country that allows marriage between half-siblings, and they must seek government counseling before marriage.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6424337.stm Incest: an age-old taboo]. BBC. 12 March 2007. retrieved 22 January 2011</ref>
Laws regarding sexual activity between close relatives vary considerably between jurisdictions, and depend on the type of sexual activity and the nature of the family relationship of the parties involved, as well as the age and sex of the parties. Prohibition of incest laws may extend to restrictions on marriage rights, which also vary between jurisdictions. Most jurisdictions prohibit parent{{ndash}}child and sibling marriages, while others also prohibit first-cousin and uncle{{ndash}}niece and aunt{{ndash}}nephew marriages. In most places, incest is illegal, regardless of the ages of the two partners. In other countries, incestuous relationships between consenting adults (with the age varying by location) are permitted, including in the [[Netherlands]], [[France]], [[Slovenia]], and [[Spain]]. [[Sweden]] is the only country that allows marriage between half-siblings, and they must seek government counseling before getting to the marriage.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6424337.stm Incest: an age-old taboo]. BBC. 12 March 2007. retrieved 22 January 2011</ref>


While the legality of consensual incest varies by country, sexual assault committed against a relative is seen as a very serious crime. In some legal systems, the fact of a perpetrator being a close relative to the victim constitutes an [[aggravating circumstance]] in the case of sexual crimes such as [[rape]] and [[child sexual abuse|sexual conduct with a minor]]{{nbsp}}– this is the case in [[Romania]].<ref>See Articles 218–221 of the [[Penal Code of Romania#The Penal Code of 2014|Romanian Penal Code]] [http://www.avocatura.com/ll491-noul-cod-penal.html] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150517054948/http://www.avocatura.com/ll491-noul-cod-penal.html|date=17 May 2015}}</ref>
While the legality of consensual incest depends on the country which you live in, sexual assault committed against a close term relative is seen as a very serious crime in most countries. In some legal systems, the fact of a perpetrator being a close relative to the victim constitutes an [[aggravating circumstance]] in the case of any kinds of sexual crimes such as [[rape]] and [[child sexual abuse|sexual conduct with a minor]]{{nbsp}}– this is the case in [[Romania]].<ref>See Articles 218–221 of the [[Penal Code of Romania#The Penal Code of 2014|Romanian Penal Code]] [http://www.avocatura.com/ll491-noul-cod-penal.html] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150517054948/http://www.avocatura.com/ll491-noul-cod-penal.html|date=17 May 2015}}</ref>


==Religious and philosophical views <span class="anchor" id="Religious views"></span>==
==Religious and philosophical views <span class="anchor" id="Religious views"></span>==
Line 163: Line 165:
===Judaism===
===Judaism===
{{main|Jewish views on incest}}
{{main|Jewish views on incest}}
The first religious resource found that prohibits incest, is the Torah, in book of Leviticus, chapter 18,<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'', {{bibleverse||Leviticus|18|HE}}</ref> "the children of Israel"{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} Israelite men and women alike{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} are forbidden from sexual relations between people who are "near of kin" (verse 6), who are defined as:
 
Jewish views on incest is mixed, with some scholars finding support in modern times only for the case of Jewish survival and genetic purity/preservation. The first religious resource found that prohibits incest, is the Torah, in book of Leviticus, chapter 18,<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'', {{bibleverse||Leviticus|18|HE}}</ref> "the children of Israel"{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} Israelite men and women alike{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} are forbidden from sexual relations between people who are "near of kin" (verse 6), who are defined as:
* Children and their mothers (verse 7);
* Children and their mothers (verse 7);
* Siblings and half-siblings (verses 9 and 11). Relationships between these are particularly singled out for a curse in [http://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0527.htm Deuteronomy 27], and they are of the only two kinds of incestuous relationships that are among the particularly singled-out relationships{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} with the other particularly singled-out relationships being ones of non-incestuous family betrayal (cf. verse 20) and bestiality (cf. verse 21);
* Siblings and half-siblings (verses 9 and 11). Relationships between these are particularly singled out for a curse in [http://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0527.htm Deuteronomy 27], and they are of the only two kinds of incestuous relationships that are among the particularly singled-out relationships{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} with the other particularly singled-out relationships being ones of non-incestuous family betrayal (cf. verse 20) and bestiality (cf. verse 21);
* Grandparents and grandchildren (verse 10);
* Grandparents and grandchildren (verse 10);
* Aunts and nephews, uncles and nieces, etc. (verses 12–14).<ref>Also see the [[Central Conference of American Rabbis]]' [https://ccarnet.org/responsa/142-marriage-mothers-sister-or-half-sister-aunt-or/ Responsum 142].</ref> Relationships between these are the second kind of relationships that are particularly singled out for a curse in [http://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0527.htm Deuteronomy 27], and the explicit examples of children-in-law and mothers-in-law (verse 23) serve to remind the Israelites that the parents-in-law are also (or at least should also be) the children-in-law's aunts and uncles:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0436.htm|title=Numbers 36 / Hebrew Bible in English / Mechon-Mamre|website=www.mechon-mamre.org|access-date=14 August 2021|archive-date=25 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210925053705/https://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0436.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>
* Aunts and nephews, uncles and nieces, etc. (verses 12–14).<ref>Also see the [[Central Conference of American Rabbis]]' [https://ccarnet.org/responsa/142-marriage-mothers-sister-or-half-sister-aunt-or/ Responsum 142].</ref> Relationships between these are the second kind of relationships that are particularly singled out for a curse in [http://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0527.htm Deuteronomy 27], and the explicit examples of children-in-law and mothers-in-law (verse 23) serve to remind the Israelites that the parents-in-law are also (or at least should also be) the children-in-law's aunts and uncles:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0436.htm|title=Numbers 36 / Hebrew Bible in English / Mechon-Mamre|website=www.mechon-mamre.org|access-date=14 August 2021|archive-date=25 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210925053705/https://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et0436.htm}}</ref>


<blockquote>And Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the word of the LORD, saying: 'The tribe of the sons of Joseph speaketh right. This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded concerning the daughters of [[Zelophehad]], saying: Let them be married to whom they think best; only into the family of the tribe of their father shall they be married. So shall no inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe; for the children of Israel shall cleave every one to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers. And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may possess every man the inheritance of his fathers. So shall no inheritance remove from one tribe to another tribe; for the tribes of the children of Israel shall cleave each one to its own inheritance.' Even as the LORD commanded Moses, so did the daughters of Zelophehad. For Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto their father's brothers' sons.<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'' {{bibleverse||Leviticus|18:12–14|HE}}</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>And Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the word of the LORD, saying: 'The tribe of the sons of Joseph speaketh right. This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded concerning the daughters of [[Zelophehad]], saying: Let them be married to whom they think best; only into the family of the tribe of their father shall they be married. So shall no inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe; for the children of Israel shall cleave every one to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers. And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may possess every man the inheritance of his fathers. So shall no inheritance remove from one tribe to another tribe; for the tribes of the children of Israel shall cleave each one to its own inheritance.' Even as the LORD commanded Moses, so did the daughters of Zelophehad. For Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto their father's brothers' sons.<ref>''Hebrew-English Bible'' {{bibleverse||Leviticus|18:12–14|HE}}</ref></blockquote>
Line 190: Line 193:


===Islam===
===Islam===
{{main|Mahram}}
{{see also|Mahram|Cousin marriage in the Middle East|l2=Cousin marriage in Islam|Criticism of Islam}}
The [[Quran]] gives specific rules regarding incest, which prohibit a man from marrying or having sexual relationships with:


* his father's wife<ref>{{qref|4|22|c=y}}</ref> (his mother,<ref name="qref 4:23">{{qref|4|23|c=y}}</ref> or stepmother,<ref name="qref 4:23" /> his mother-in-law, a woman from whom he has nursed, even the children of this woman);<ref name="qref 4:23" />
Islam strongly prohibits and outlaws inbreeding and incest, which is regarded as traits of the "[[Jahiliyyah]]" generations (Uneducated/Ignorant Generation).
The [[Quran]] gives specific rules condemning incest, which prohibit a human from marrying or having sexual relationships with:
 
* his sister, his half-sister, a woman who has nursed from the same woman as him, and his sister-in-law (wife's sister) while still married. Half relations are as sacred as full relations;<ref name="qref 4:23">{{qref|4|23|c=y}}</ref>
* his daughter, his stepdaughter (if the marriage to her mother was [[consummation|consummated]]), his daughter-in-law.<ref name="qref 4:23" />
* his niece (child of sibling);<ref name="qref 4:23" />
* either parent's sister (aunt);<ref name="qref 4:23" />
* either parent's sister (aunt);<ref name="qref 4:23" />
* his sister, his half-sister, a woman who has nursed from the same woman as him, and his sister-in-law (wife's sister) while still married. Half relations are as sacred as full relations;<ref name="qref 4:23" />
* his niece (child of sibling);<ref name="qref 4:23" />
* his daughter, his stepdaughter (if the marriage to her mother was [[consummation|consummated]]), his daughter-in-law.<ref name="qref 4:23" />


Cousin marriage finds support in Islamic scriptures and is [[Cousin marriage in the Middle East|widespread in the Middle East]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Inhorn |first1=Marcia C. |first2=Wendy |last2=Chavkin |first3=José-Alberto |last3=Navarro |date=2014 |title=Globalized Fatherhood |location=New York City |publisher=Berghahn Books |page=245 |isbn=9781782384380 }}</ref>
Cousin marriage is discouraged. Historically especially before Islam, in certain regions, [[Cousin marriage in the Middle East|widespread in the Middle East]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Inhorn |first1=Marcia C. |first2=Wendy |last2=Chavkin |first3=José-Alberto |last3=Navarro |date=2014 |title=Globalized Fatherhood |location=New York City |publisher=Berghahn Books |page=245 |isbn=978-1-78238-438-0 }}</ref>


Although Islam allows cousin marriage, there are [[hadith]]s attributed to Muhammad calling for distance from the marriage of relatives. However, Muslim scholars generally consider these hadiths unreliable.<ref>{{cite web|author1=Shaykh Faraz A. Khan|title=Did the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) Discourage Marrying Cousins? – SeekersHub Answers|url=http://seekershub.org/ans-blog/2011/10/07/did-the-prophet-peace-be-upon-him-discourage-marrying-cousins/|website=SeekersHub Answers|access-date=12 August 2017|date=7 October 2011|archive-date=2 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502215209/http://seekershub.org/ans-blog/2011/10/07/did-the-prophet-peace-be-upon-him-discourage-marrying-cousins/|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author1=Saleem Ahmed, Ph.D|title=Cousin Marriage Among Muslims|url=http://muslimcouncilofamerica.org/cousin-marriage-among-muslims/|website=Muslim Council of America Foundation|access-date=12 August 2017|archive-date=12 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812173119/http://muslimcouncilofamerica.org/cousin-marriage-among-muslims/|url-status=usurped}}</ref>
Although Islam does not specifically cite punishments for cousin marriage, there are [[hadith]]s attributed to Muhammad calling for distance from the marriage of relatives.<ref>{{cite web|author1=Shaykh Faraz A. Khan|title=Did the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) Discourage Marrying Cousins? – SeekersHub Answers|url=http://seekershub.org/ans-blog/2011/10/07/did-the-prophet-peace-be-upon-him-discourage-marrying-cousins/|website=SeekersHub Answers|access-date=12 August 2017|date=7 October 2011|archive-date=2 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502215209/http://seekershub.org/ans-blog/2011/10/07/did-the-prophet-peace-be-upon-him-discourage-marrying-cousins/}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author1=Saleem Ahmed, Ph.D|title=Cousin Marriage Among Muslims|url=http://muslimcouncilofamerica.org/cousin-marriage-among-muslims/|website=Muslim Council of America Foundation|access-date=12 August 2017|archive-date=12 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812173119/http://muslimcouncilofamerica.org/cousin-marriage-among-muslims/|url-status=usurped}}</ref>


===Zoroastrian===
===Zoroastrian===
{{Main|Xwedodah}}
{{Main|Xwedodah}}
In [[Ancient Persia]], incest between cousins is a blessed virtue, although, in some sources, incest is believed to be related to that of parent{{ndash}}child or brother{{ndash}}sister.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0qcdrMTprSMC|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200803085652/https://books.google.com/books?id=0qcdrMTprSMC|url-status=dead|archive-date=3 August 2020|title=Sex and Punishment: Four Thousand Years of Judging Desire|last=Berkowitz|first=Eric|date=2012|publisher=Counterpoint Press|isbn=9781582437965|pages=21–22}}</ref> Under [[Zoroastrianism]], royalty, clergy, and commoners practiced incest, though the extent in the lattermost class was unknown.<ref name="Skjaervo 2013">{{Cite web|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/marriage-next-of-kin|title=Marriage II. Next-Of -Kin Marriage In Zoroastrianism|last=Skjaervo|first=Prods Oktor|author-link=Prods Oktor Skjaervo|website=www.iranicaonline.org|publisher=[[Encyclopaedia Iranica]], online edition|date=2013|access-date=20 August 2018}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> This tradition was called [[Xwedodah]]<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bigwood|first=Joan M.|date=December 2009|title='Incestuous' Marriage in Achaemenid Iran: Myths and Realities|journal=Klio|volume=91|issue=2|pages=311–341|doi=10.1524/klio.2009.0015|s2cid=191672920|issn=0075-6334}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Scheidel|first=Walter|date=1 September 1996|title=Brother-sister and parent-child marriage outside royal families in ancient egypt and iran: A challenge to the sociobiological view of incest avoidance?|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223430185|journal=Ethology and Sociobiology|volume=17|issue=5|pages=319–340|doi=10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00074-X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=García|first=María Olalla|date=2001|title="Xwedodah": el matrimonio consanguíneo en la Persia Sásanida. Una comparación entre fuentes pahlavíes y greco-latinas|url=https://publicaciones.unirioja.es/ojs/index.php/iberia/article/view/267|journal=Iberia. Revista de la Antigüedad|language=es|volume=4|pages=181–197|issn=1699-6909}}</ref> ({{Langx|ae|Xᵛaētuuadaθa }}).<ref name="Skjaervo 2013"/><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cNUEnHU0BPoC&q=xwedodah&pg=PA430|title=Traditions of the Magi: Zoroastrianism in Greek and Latin Literature|last=Jong|first=Albert De|date=1997|publisher=BRILL|isbn=978-9004108448|pages=430–433}}</ref> The tradition was considered so sacred that the bodily fluids produced by an incestuous couple were thought to have curative powers.<ref name=":0" /> For instance, the [[Vendidad]] advised corpse-bearers to purify themselves with a mixture of the urine of a married incestuous couple.<ref name=":0" /> [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], in his book ''[[The Birth of Tragedy]]'', cited that among Zoroastrians, a wise priest is born only by Xvaetvadatha.<ref>''The Birth of Tragedy'', Friedrich Nietzsche. Anaconda Verlag – 2012.</ref>
 
In [[Ancient Persia]], incest between cousins is a blessed virtue, although, in some sources, incest is believed to be related to that of parent{{ndash}}child or brother{{ndash}}sister.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0qcdrMTprSMC|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200803085652/https://books.google.com/books?id=0qcdrMTprSMC|archive-date=3 August 2020|title=Sex and Punishment: Four Thousand Years of Judging Desire|last=Berkowitz|first=Eric|date=2012|publisher=Counterpoint Press|isbn=978-1-58243-796-5|pages=21–22}}</ref> Under [[Zoroastrianism]], royalty, clergy, and commoners practiced incest, though the extent in the lattermost class was unknown.<ref name="Skjaervo 2013">{{Cite web|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/marriage-next-of-kin|title=Marriage II. Next-Of -Kin Marriage In Zoroastrianism|last=Skjaervo|first=Prods Oktor|author-link=Prods Oktor Skjaervo|website=www.iranicaonline.org|publisher=[[Encyclopaedia Iranica]], online edition|date=2013|access-date=20 August 2018}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> This tradition was called [[Xwedodah]]<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bigwood|first=Joan M.|date=December 2009|title='Incestuous' Marriage in Achaemenid Iran: Myths and Realities|journal=Klio|volume=91|issue=2|pages=311–341|doi=10.1524/klio.2009.0015|s2cid=191672920|issn=0075-6334}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Scheidel|first=Walter|date=1 September 1996|title=Brother-sister and parent-child marriage outside royal families in ancient egypt and iran: A challenge to the sociobiological view of incest avoidance?|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223430185|journal=Ethology and Sociobiology|volume=17|issue=5|pages=319–340|doi=10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00074-X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=García|first=María Olalla|date=2001|title="Xwedodah": el matrimonio consanguíneo en la Persia Sásanida. Una comparación entre fuentes pahlavíes y greco-latinas|url=https://publicaciones.unirioja.es/ojs/index.php/iberia/article/view/267|journal=Iberia. Revista de la Antigüedad|language=es|volume=4|pages=181–197|issn=1699-6909}}</ref> ({{Langx|ae|Xᵛaētuuadaθa }}).<ref name="Skjaervo 2013"/><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cNUEnHU0BPoC&q=xwedodah&pg=PA430|title=Traditions of the Magi: Zoroastrianism in Greek and Latin Literature|last=Jong|first=Albert De|date=1997|publisher=BRILL|isbn=978-90-04-10844-8|pages=430–433}}</ref> The tradition was considered so sacred that the bodily fluids produced by an incestuous couple were thought to have curative powers.<ref name=":0" /> For instance, the [[Vendidad]] advised corpse-bearers to purify themselves with a mixture of the urine of a married incestuous couple.<ref name=":0" /> [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], in his book ''[[The Birth of Tragedy]]'', cited that among Zoroastrians, a wise priest is born only by Xvaetvadatha.<ref>''The Birth of Tragedy'', Friedrich Nietzsche. Anaconda Verlag – 2012.</ref>


To what extent Xvaetvadatha was practiced in [[Sasanian]] Iran and before{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} especially outside the royal and noble families ("dynastic incest") and, perhaps, the clergy{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} and whether practices ascribed to them can be assumed to be characteristic of the general population is not clear. There is a lack of genealogies and census material on the frequency of Xvaetvadatha.<ref>Michael Mitterauer, "The Customs of the Magians: The Problem of Incest in Historical Societies," in Roy Porter and Mikuláš Teich, eds., Sexual Knowledge, Sexual Science: The History of Attitudes to Sexuality, Cambridge, UK, and New York, 1994, pp. 231–50.</ref><ref name="Fischer 2007">Fischer, Michael MJ. "Ptolemaic Jouissance and the Anthropology of Kinship: A Commentary on Ager" The Power of Excess: Royal Incest and the Ptolemaic Dynasty"." Anthropologica 49, no. 2 (2007): 295–299.</ref> Evidence from [[Dura-Europos]], however, combined with that of the Jewish and Christian sources citing actual cases under the Sasanians, strengthens the evidence of the Zoroastrian texts. In the post-Sasanian Zoroastrian literature, Xvaetvadatha is said to refer to marriages between cousins instead, which have always been relatively common.<ref>*Jakob Eduard Polak, Persien, das Land und seine Bewohner: ethnographische Schilderungen, 2 vols in one, Leipzig, 1865; tr. Kaykāvus Jahāndāri as Safar-nāma-ye Polāk: Iran wa Irāniān, Tehran, 1982.
To what extent Xvaetvadatha was practiced in [[Sasanian]] Iran and before{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} especially outside the royal and noble families ("dynastic incest") and, perhaps, the clergy{{nbsp}}{{ndash}} and whether practices ascribed to them can be assumed to be characteristic of the general population is not clear. There is a lack of genealogies and census material on the frequency of Xvaetvadatha.<ref>Michael Mitterauer, "The Customs of the Magians: The Problem of Incest in Historical Societies," in Roy Porter and Mikuláš Teich, eds., Sexual Knowledge, Sexual Science: The History of Attitudes to Sexuality, Cambridge, UK, and New York, 1994, pp. 231–50.</ref><ref name="Fischer 2007">Fischer, Michael MJ. "Ptolemaic Jouissance and the Anthropology of Kinship: A Commentary on Ager" The Power of Excess: Royal Incest and the Ptolemaic Dynasty"." Anthropologica 49, no. 2 (2007): 295–299.</ref> Evidence from [[Dura-Europos]], however, combined with that of the Jewish and Christian sources citing actual cases under the Sasanians, strengthens the evidence of the Zoroastrian texts. In the post-Sasanian Zoroastrian literature, Xvaetvadatha is said to refer to marriages between cousins instead, which have always been relatively common.<ref>*Jakob Eduard Polak, Persien, das Land und seine Bewohner: ethnographische Schilderungen, 2 vols in one, Leipzig, 1865; tr. Kaykāvus Jahāndāri as Safar-nāma-ye Polāk: Iran wa Irāniān, Tehran, 1982.
Line 221: Line 226:
The founder of [[Stoicism]], [[Zeno of Citium]], stated that incest was permissible in ''[[Republic (Zeno)|Republic]]'', as did the later prominent Stoic philosopher [[Chrysippus]]. However, Zeno only advocates for incest under unique circumstances, such as procreating with one's ailing mother to beget "glorious" children, thus comforting her. Otherwise, incest is condemned as being contrary to Nature. Zeno further condemns incest from a moral and psychological perspective, considering it to be a sign of [[Plato]]'s tyrannical soul, defined as a soul that is governed by illimitable desire. He uses [[Oedipus]] as a tragic example.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hook |first1=Brian S. |title=Oedipus and Thyestes among the Philosophers: Incest and Cannibalism in Plato, Diogenes, and Zeno |journal=Classical Philology |date=January 2005 |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=17–40 |doi=10.1086/431428 |s2cid=161961479 }}</ref> Nonetheless, later Stoic disciples by the 1st century BC downplayed the pro-incest advocacy, accusing Zeno of being "young and thoughtless" when he wrote ''Republic''.<ref>A view attributed to some contemporary Stoics by [[Philodemus]], ''On the Stoics'', c. 2. col 9. ed. Dorandi.</ref>
The founder of [[Stoicism]], [[Zeno of Citium]], stated that incest was permissible in ''[[Republic (Zeno)|Republic]]'', as did the later prominent Stoic philosopher [[Chrysippus]]. However, Zeno only advocates for incest under unique circumstances, such as procreating with one's ailing mother to beget "glorious" children, thus comforting her. Otherwise, incest is condemned as being contrary to Nature. Zeno further condemns incest from a moral and psychological perspective, considering it to be a sign of [[Plato]]'s tyrannical soul, defined as a soul that is governed by illimitable desire. He uses [[Oedipus]] as a tragic example.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hook |first1=Brian S. |title=Oedipus and Thyestes among the Philosophers: Incest and Cannibalism in Plato, Diogenes, and Zeno |journal=Classical Philology |date=January 2005 |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=17–40 |doi=10.1086/431428 |s2cid=161961479 }}</ref> Nonetheless, later Stoic disciples by the 1st century BC downplayed the pro-incest advocacy, accusing Zeno of being "young and thoughtless" when he wrote ''Republic''.<ref>A view attributed to some contemporary Stoics by [[Philodemus]], ''On the Stoics'', c. 2. col 9. ed. Dorandi.</ref>


==Animals==
==Other animals==
{{see also|Animal sexual behavior#Inbreeding avoidance}}
{{see also|Animal sexual behavior#Inbreeding avoidance}}
[[File:Fruit flies mating.jpg|thumb|[[Drosophila melanogaster|Common fruit fly]] females prefer to mate with their own brothers over unrelated males.<ref name="fruit-flies">{{cite journal |last1=Loyau |first1=Adeline |last2=Cornuau |first2=Jérémie H. |last3=Clobert |first3=Jean |last4=Danchin |first4=Étienne |date=10 December 2012 |title=Incestuous Sisters: Mate Preference for Brothers over Unrelated Males in Drosophila melanogaster |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=7 |issue=12 |pages=e51293 |bibcode=2012PLoSO...751293L |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0051293 |pmc=3519633 |pmid=23251487 |doi-access=free}}</ref>]]
[[File:Fruit flies mating.jpg|thumb|[[Drosophila melanogaster|Common fruit fly]] females prefer to mate with their own brothers over unrelated males.<ref name="fruit-flies">{{cite journal |last1=Loyau |first1=Adeline |last2=Cornuau |first2=Jérémie H. |last3=Clobert |first3=Jean |last4=Danchin |first4=Étienne |date=10 December 2012 |title=Incestuous Sisters: Mate Preference for Brothers over Unrelated Males in Drosophila melanogaster |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=7 |issue=12 |article-number=e51293 |bibcode=2012PLoSO...751293L |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0051293 |pmc=3519633 |pmid=23251487 |doi-access=free}}</ref>]]


Inbreeding avoidance is rare in non-human animals.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=de Boer |first1=Raïssa A. |last2=Vega-Trejo |first2=Regina |last3=Kotrschal |first3=Alexander |last4=Fitzpatrick |first4=John L. |date=July 2021 |title=Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-021-01453-9 |journal=Nature Ecology & Evolution |language=en |volume=5 |issue=7 |pages=949–964 |doi=10.1038/s41559-021-01453-9 |pmid=33941905 |bibcode=2021NatEE...5..949D |s2cid=233718913 |issn=2397-334X|url-access=subscription }}</ref> [[North Carolina State University]] found that [[bed bug]]s, in contrast to most other insects, tolerate incest and are able to genetically withstand the effects of inbreeding quite well.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2011/12/insect-incest-produces-healthy-offspring |title=Insect Incest Produces Healthy Offspring |date=8 December 2011 |access-date=14 February 2017 |archive-date=16 May 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170516080757/http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2011/12/insect-incest-produces-healthy-offspring |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Inbreeding avoidance is rare in non-human animals.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=de Boer |first1=Raïssa A. |last2=Vega-Trejo |first2=Regina |last3=Kotrschal |first3=Alexander |last4=Fitzpatrick |first4=John L. |date=July 2021 |title=Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-021-01453-9 |journal=Nature Ecology & Evolution |language=en |volume=5 |issue=7 |pages=949–964 |doi=10.1038/s41559-021-01453-9 |pmid=33941905 |bibcode=2021NatEE...5..949D |s2cid=233718913 |issn=2397-334X|url-access=subscription }}</ref> [[North Carolina State University]] found that [[bed bug]]s, in contrast to most other insects, tolerate inbreeding and are able to genetically withstand its effects quite well.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2011/12/insect-incest-produces-healthy-offspring |title=Insect Incest Produces Healthy Offspring |date=8 December 2011 |access-date=14 February 2017 |archive-date=16 May 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170516080757/http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2011/12/insect-incest-produces-healthy-offspring }}</ref>


Many species of [[mammal]]s, including humanity's closest [[primate]] relatives, tend to avoid mating with close relatives, especially if there are alternative partners available.<ref>{{cite book |title=Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century |first=Arthur P. |last=Wolf |author2=William H. Durham |year=2004 |publisher=Stanford University Press |page=169 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OW1nuQxcIQgC&pg=PA6 |isbn=978-0-8047-5141-4}}</ref> However, some chimpanzees have been recorded attempting to mate with their mothers.<ref>[http://www.livescience.com/2226-incest-taboo-nature.html Incest not so taboo in nature] Livescience, retrieved 29 January 2012</ref> Male rats have been recorded engaging in mating with their sisters, but they tend to prefer non-related females over their sisters.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=bsCiWUiPY5UC&pg=PA293 Sexual Behaviour In Animals] A. Sarkar; retrieved 29 January 2012</ref>
Many species of [[mammal]]s, including humanity's closest [[primate]] relatives, tend to avoid mating with close relatives, especially if there are alternative partners available.<ref>{{cite book |title=Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century |first=Arthur P. |last=Wolf |author2=William H. Durham |year=2004 |publisher=Stanford University Press |page=169 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OW1nuQxcIQgC&pg=PA6 |isbn=978-0-8047-5141-4}}</ref> However, some chimpanzees have been recorded attempting to mate with their mothers.<ref>[http://www.livescience.com/2226-incest-taboo-nature.html Incest not so taboo in nature] Livescience, retrieved 29 January 2012</ref> Male rats have been recorded engaging in mating with their sisters, but they tend to prefer non-related females over their sisters.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=bsCiWUiPY5UC&pg=PA293 Sexual Behaviour In Animals] A. Sarkar; retrieved 29 January 2012</ref>
Line 239: Line 244:
* [[Genetic diversity]]
* [[Genetic diversity]]
* [[Genetic sexual attraction]]
* [[Genetic sexual attraction]]
* [[Inbreeding]]
* [[Incest between twins]]
* [[Incest between twins]]
* [[Incest taboo]]
* [[Incest taboo]]
Line 257: Line 263:
;Bibliography
;Bibliography
{{Refbegin}}
{{Refbegin}}
* {{cite encyclopedia | article = Women i. In Pre-Islamic Persia | last = Brosius | first = Maria | url = http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/women-i | encyclopedia = Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol | location = London et al. | year = 2000 | title = <!-- nope --> | access-date = 2019-09-21 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200313213156/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/women-i | archive-date = 2020-03-13 | url-status = dead }}
* {{cite encyclopedia | article = Women i. In Pre-Islamic Persia | last = Brosius | first = Maria | url = http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/women-i | encyclopedia = Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol | location = London et al. | year = 2000 | title = <!-- nope --> | access-date = 2019-09-21 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200313213156/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/women-i | archive-date = 2020-03-13 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia | title = Cambyses II | last = Dandamayev | first = Muhammad A. | url = http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cambyses-opers | encyclopedia  = Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. IV, Fasc. 7 | pages = 726–729 | year = 1990 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia | title = Cambyses II | last = Dandamayev | first = Muhammad A. | url = http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cambyses-opers | encyclopedia  = Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. IV, Fasc. 7 | pages = 726–729 | year = 1990 }}
* Bixler, Ray H. (1982) "Comment on the Incidence and Purpose of Royal Sibling Incest," ''American Ethnologist'', ''9''(3), August, pp.&nbsp;580–582. {{JSTOR|680655}}
* Bixler, Ray H. (1982) "Comment on the Incidence and Purpose of Royal Sibling Incest," ''American Ethnologist'', ''9''(3), August, pp.&nbsp;580–582. {{JSTOR|680655}}