Advanced Mobile Phone System: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Frietjes Undid revision 1274955332 by 2001:44C8:6703:1FE5:B843:ECFF:FE23:B4B9 (talk) |
imported>Smurr7 m Fix grammar |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Analog mobile phone system standard}} | {{short description|Analog mobile phone system standard}} | ||
{{Use American English|date=March 2026}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2020}} | {{Use mdy dates|date=April 2020}} | ||
[[File:DynaTAC8000X.jpg|thumb|[[Motorola DynaTAC]] 8000X [[TACS]] mobile phone]] | [[File:DynaTAC8000X.jpg|thumb|[[Motorola DynaTAC]] 8000X [[TACS]] mobile phone]] | ||
'''Advanced Mobile Phone System''' ('''AMPS''') was an [[analog mobile phone]] system standard originally developed by [[Bell Labs]] and later modified in a cooperative effort between Bell Labs and Motorola. It was officially introduced in the Americas on October 13, 1983,<ref name="Testing the First Cell Phone Network">{{cite web|author=AT&T Tech Channel |url=http://techchannel.att.com/play-video.cfm/2011/6/13/AT&T-Archives-AMPS:-coming-of-age |title=AT&T Archives : Testing the First Public Cell Phone Network |publisher=Techchannel.att.com |date=June 13, 2011 |access-date=September 28, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029194138/http://techchannel.att. | '''Advanced Mobile Phone System''' ('''AMPS''') was an [[analog mobile phone]] system standard originally developed by [[Bell Labs]] and later modified in a cooperative effort between Bell Labs and [[Motorola]]. It was officially introduced in the Americas on October 13, 1983,<ref name="Testing the First Cell Phone Network">{{cite web|author=AT&T Tech Channel |url=http://techchannel.att.com/play-video.cfm/2011/6/13/AT&T-Archives-AMPS:-coming-of-age |title=AT&T Archives : Testing the First Public Cell Phone Network |publisher=Techchannel.att.com |date=June 13, 2011 |access-date=September 28, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029194138/http://techchannel.att.jdjsuajnsjdjjsnnddjduruecom/play-video.cfm/2011/6/13/AT%26T-Archives-AMPS%3A-coming-of-age |archive-date=October 29, 2013 }}</ref><ref name="PrivateLine">{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20120610001231/http://www.privateline.com/dailynotes/index13.html Private Line]}}</ref><ref name = "MilestonesPast">[http://www.milestonespast.com/exbringing.htm MilestonesPast] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111006011650/http://www.milestonespast.com/exbringing.htm |date=October 6, 2011 }}</ref> and was deployed in many other countries, including Israel in 1986, Australia in 1987, Singapore in 1988, and Pakistan in 1990.<ref name="Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association">{{cite web|url=http://www.amta.org.au/default.asp?Page=142 |title=Ten years of GSM in Australia |access-date=August 16, 2008 |work=AMTA |publisher=Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association |year=2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720110058/http://www.amta.org.au/default.asp?Page=142 |archive-date=July 20, 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> It was the primary analog mobile phone system<ref>{{Citation |title=mobile phone system standard |work=SpringerReference |date=2011 |url=http://www.springerreference.com/index/doi/10.1007/springerreference_19035 |access-date=2026-03-18 |place=Berlin/Heidelberg |publisher=Springer-Verlag |doi=10.1007/springerreference_19035 |doi-broken-date=March 31, 2026 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> in North America (and other locales) through the 1980s and into the 2000s. As of February 18, 2008, carriers in the United States were no longer required to support AMPS,<ref>{{Cite web |date=September 27, 2022 |title=800 MHz Cellular Service |url=https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau-divisions/mobility-division/800-mhz-cellular-service |website=Federal Communications Commission (FCC)}}</ref> and companies such as [[AT&T]] and [[Verizon Communications]] have discontinued this service permanently. AMPS was discontinued in Australia in September 2000, in India in October 2004<ref name="Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pta.gov.pk/index.php/en?Itemid=1&cur_t=vtext&id=237&option=com_content&scid=146|title=Home | PTA|website=pta.gov.pk}}</ref> in Israel in January 2010, and in Brazil in 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://g1.globo.com/tecnologia/noticia/2010/07/celulares-analogicos-estao-extintos-no-brasil-diz-anatel.html|title=Celulares analógicos estão extintos no Brasil, diz Anatel|first=Agencia|last=Estado|date=July 16, 2010|website=Tecnologia e Games}}</ref> | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The first cellular network efforts began at [[Bell Labs]] and with research conducted at [[Motorola]]. | The first cellular network efforts began at [[Bell Labs]] and with research conducted at [[Motorola]]. | ||
In 1960, [[John Francis Mitchell|John F. Mitchell]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brophy.net/PivotX/?p=john-francis-mitchell-biography |title=John F. Mitchell Biography |publisher=Brophy.net |date=August 7, 2012 |access-date=September 28, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.historyofthecellphone.com/people/john-mitchell.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130117052435/http://www.historyofthecellphone.com/people/john-mitchell.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 17, 2013 |title=The Top Giants in Telephony |publisher=Historyofthecellphone.com |date=June 11, 2009 |access-date=September 28, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brophy.net/PivotX/?p=john-francis-mitchell-biography#CELLPHONEINVENTOR |title=Who invented the cell phone? |publisher=Brophy.net |date=August 7, 2012 |access-date=September 28, 2013}}</ref> | In 1960, [[John Francis Mitchell|John F. Mitchell]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.brophy.net/PivotX/?p=john-francis-mitchell-biography |title=John F. Mitchell Biography |publisher=Brophy.net |date=August 7, 2012 |access-date=September 28, 2013 |archive-date=February 23, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223150703/http://www.brophy.net/PivotX/?p=john-francis-mitchell-biography |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.historyofthecellphone.com/people/john-mitchell.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130117052435/http://www.historyofthecellphone.com/people/john-mitchell.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 17, 2013 |title=The Top Giants in Telephony |publisher=Historyofthecellphone.com |date=June 11, 2009 |access-date=September 28, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.brophy.net/PivotX/?p=john-francis-mitchell-biography#CELLPHONEINVENTOR |title=Who invented the cell phone? |publisher=Brophy.net |date=August 7, 2012 |access-date=September 28, 2013 |archive-date=February 23, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223150703/http://www.brophy.net/PivotX/?p=john-francis-mitchell-biography#CELLPHONEINVENTOR |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
became Motorola's chief engineer for its mobile-communication products, and oversaw the development and marketing of the first [[pager]] to use transistors. | became Motorola's chief engineer for its mobile-communication products, and oversaw the development and marketing of the first [[pager]] to use transistors. | ||
Motorola had long produced [[Radiotelephone|mobile telephone]]s for automobiles, but these large and heavy models consumed too much power to allow their use without the automobile's engine running. Mitchell's team, which included [[Martin Cooper (inventor)|Dr. Martin Cooper]], developed portable cellular telephony. Cooper and Mitchell were among the Motorola employees granted a patent for this work in 1973. | Motorola had long produced [[Radiotelephone|mobile telephone]]s for automobiles, but these large and heavy models consumed too much power to allow their use without the automobile's engine running. Mitchell's team, which included [[Martin Cooper (inventor)|Dr. Martin Cooper]], developed portable cellular telephony. Cooper and Mitchell were among the Motorola employees granted a patent for this work in 1973. The first call on the prototype reportedly connected to a wrong number.<ref> | ||
Motorola Executive Helped Spur Cellular Revolution, Oversaw Ill-fated Iridium Project, ''The Wall Street Journal'', Remembrances, June 20–21, 2009, p. A10 | Motorola Executive Helped Spur Cellular Revolution, Oversaw Ill-fated Iridium Project, ''The Wall Street Journal'', Remembrances, June 20–21, 2009, p. A10 | ||
</ref><ref> | </ref><ref> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
While Motorola was developing a cellular phone, from 1968 to 1983 Bell Labs worked out a system called Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), which became the first cellular network standard in the United States. | While Motorola was developing a cellular phone, from 1968 to 1983 Bell Labs worked out a system called Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), which became the first cellular network standard in the United States. The Bell system deployed American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in Chicago, Illinois, first as an equipment test serving approximately 100 units in 1978, and subsequently as a service test planned for 2,000 billed units.<ref>{{ Citation | last = Huff | first = D. L. | date = January 1979 | title = Advanced Mobile Phone Service: The Developmental System | journal = Bell System Technical Journal | volume = 58 | issue = 1 | pages = 249–269 | doi = 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02218.x | bibcode = 1979BSTJ...58..249H | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02218.x | accessdate = 13 Nov 2024 | url-access = subscription }}</ref> Motorola and others designed and built the cellular phones for this and other cellular systems. Louis M. Weinberg, a marketing director at AT&T, was named the first president of the AMPS corporation. He served in this position during the startup of the AMPS subsidiary of AT&T. | ||
[[Martin Cooper (inventor)|Martin Cooper]], a former general manager for the systems division at Motorola, led a team that produced the first cellular handset in 1973 and made the first phone call from it. In 1983 Motorola introduced the [[Motorola DynaTAC|DynaTAC 8000x]], the first commercially available cellular phone small enough to be easily carried. He later introduced the so-called [[Motorola Bag Phone|Bag Phone]]. | [[Martin Cooper (inventor)|Martin Cooper]], a former general manager for the systems division at Motorola, led a team that produced the first cellular handset in 1973 and made the first phone call from it. In 1983 Motorola introduced the [[Motorola DynaTAC|DynaTAC 8000x]], the first commercially available cellular phone small enough to be easily carried. He later introduced the so-called [[Motorola Bag Phone|Bag Phone]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=A Motorola retrospective (photos) |url=https://www.cnet.com/pictures/a-motorola-retrospective-photos/ |access-date=2026-03-18 |website=CNET |language=en}}</ref> | ||
In 1992, the first [[smartphone]], called [[IBM Simon]], used AMPS. | In 1992, the first [[smartphone]], called [[IBM Simon]], used AMPS. [[Frank J. Canova|Frank Canova]] led its design at [[IBM]] and it was demonstrated that year at the [[COMDEX]] computer-industry trade-show. A refined version of the product was marketed to consumers in 1994 by [[BellSouth]] under the name Simon Personal Communicator. The Simon was the first device that can be properly referred to as a "smartphone", even though that term was not yet coined.<ref name=bus_week_2012>{{cite web |url=http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-06-29/before-iphone-and-android-came-simon-the-first-smartphone |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120701034025/http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-06-29/before-iphone-and-android-came-simon-the-first-smartphone |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 1, 2012 |title=Before IPhone and Android Came Simon, the First Smartphone |last=Sager |first=Ira |date=June 29, 2012 |work=Bloomberg Businessweek |publisher=Bloomberg L.P |access-date=June 30, 2012 |quote=Simon was the first smartphone. Twenty years ago, it envisioned our app-happy mobile lives, squeezing the features of a cell phone, pager, fax machine, and computer into an 18-ounce black brick.}}</ref><ref name=schneidawind>{{cite news |last=Schneidawind |first=John |title=Poindexter putting finger on PC bugs; Big Blue unveiling |date=November 23, 1992 |newspaper=USA Today |page=2B}}</ref> | ||
== Technology == | == Technology == | ||
AMPS is a first-generation [[Cellular network|cellular]] technology that uses [[frequency-division multiple access|separate frequencies]], or "channels", for each conversation. It therefore required considerable [[bandwidth (signal processing)|bandwidth]] for a large number of users. In general terms, AMPS was very similar to the older "0G" [[Improved Mobile Telephone Service]] it replaced, but used considerably more computing power to select frequencies, hand off conversations to [[PSTN|land lines]], and handle billing and call setup. | AMPS is a first-generation [[Cellular network|cellular]] technology that uses [[frequency-division multiple access|separate frequencies]], or "channels", for each conversation. It therefore required considerable [[bandwidth (signal processing)|bandwidth]] for a large number of users. In general terms, AMPS was very similar to the older "0G" [[Improved Mobile Telephone Service]] it replaced, but used considerably more computing power to select frequencies, hand off conversations to [[PSTN|land lines]], and handle billing and call setup. | ||
What really separated AMPS from older systems is the "back end" call setup functionality. In AMPS, the cell centers could flexibly assign channels to handsets based on signal strength, allowing the same frequency to be re-used, without interference, if locations were separated enough. The channels were grouped so a specific set was different | What really separated AMPS from older systems is the "back end" call setup functionality. In AMPS, the cell centers could flexibly assign channels to handsets based on signal strength, allowing the same frequency to be re-used, without interference, if locations were separated enough. The channels were grouped so a specific set was different from the one used on the cell nearby. This allowed a larger number of phones to be supported over a geographical area. AMPS pioneers coined the term "cellular" because of its use of small hexagonal "cells" within a system.<ref name="bell_young">{{ Citation | last = Young | first = W. Rae | date = January 1979 | title = Advanced Mobile Phone Service: Introduction, Background, and Objectives | journal = Bell System Technical Journal | volume = 58 | issue = 1 | pages = 1–14 | doi = 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02208.x | bibcode = 1979BSTJ...58T08.xY | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02208.x | url-access = subscription }} (Note: Young was the Bell Labs engineer who invented the hexagonal cell concept.)</ref><ref name="fluhr_porter">{{ Citation | last1 = Fluhr | first1 = Z. C. | last2 = Porter | first2 = P. T. | date = January 1979 | title = Advanced Mobile Phone Service: Introduction, Background, and Objectives | journal = Bell System Technical Journal | volume = 58 | issue = 1 | pages = 43–69 | doi = 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02210.x | url =https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02210.x | url-access = subscription }} ''(Note: Porter was the Bell Labs engineer who proposed that the cell towers be at the corners of the hexagons rather than the centers and have directional antennas that would transmit/receive in 3 directions into 3 adjacent hexagon cells.)''</ref> | ||
AMPS suffered from many weaknesses compared to today's digital technologies. As an analog standard, it was susceptible to static and noise, and there was no protection from 'eavesdropping' using a [[Scanner (radio)|scanner]] or an older TV set that could tune into channels 70–83.<ref>{{cite web |title=Analog Cellphone Calls on UHF Channels of a TV | website=[[YouTube]] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsEgUA4z_SM}}</ref> | AMPS suffered from many weaknesses compared to today's digital technologies. As an analog standard, it was susceptible to static and noise, and there was no protection from 'eavesdropping' using a [[Scanner (radio)|scanner]] or an older TV set that could tune into channels 70–83.<ref>{{cite web |title=Analog Cellphone Calls on UHF Channels of a TV | website=[[YouTube]] | date=June 7, 2012 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsEgUA4z_SM}}</ref> | ||
==Cloning== | ==Cloning== | ||
[[File:2007Computex e21Forum-MartinCooper.jpg|thumb|[[Martin Cooper (inventor)|Martin Cooper]] of Motorola in 2007, reenacting the first private handheld mobile-phone call on a larger prototype model in 1973.]] | [[File:2007Computex e21Forum-MartinCooper.jpg|thumb|[[Martin Cooper (inventor)|Martin Cooper]] of Motorola in 2007, reenacting the first private handheld mobile-phone call on a larger prototype model in 1973.]] | ||
In the 1990s, an epidemic of "cloning" cost the cellular carriers millions of dollars.<ref>{{cite news |last1=O'Malley |first1=Kathy |title=COSTLY CELLULAR PHONE FRAUD RISES WITH NUMBER 'CLONING' |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1995-03-19-9503190163-story.html |access-date=June 18, 2019 |work=Chicago Tribune |date=March 19, 1995}}</ref> An eavesdropper with specialized equipment could intercept a handset's [[Electronic Serial Number|ESN]] (Electronic Serial Number) and MDN or CTN (Mobile Directory Number or Cellular Telephone Number). The Electronic Serial Number, a 12-digit number sent by the handset to the cellular system for billing purposes, uniquely identified that phone on the network. The system then allowed or disallowed calls and/or features based on its customer file. A person intercepting an ESN/MDN pair could clone the combination onto a different phone and use it in other areas | In the 1990s, an epidemic of "cloning" cost the cellular carriers millions of dollars.<ref>{{cite news |last1=O'Malley |first1=Kathy |title=COSTLY CELLULAR PHONE FRAUD RISES WITH NUMBER 'CLONING' |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1995-03-19-9503190163-story.html |access-date=June 18, 2019 |work=Chicago Tribune |date=March 19, 1995}}</ref> An eavesdropper with specialized equipment could intercept a handset's [[Electronic Serial Number|ESN]] (Electronic Serial Number) and MDN or CTN (Mobile Directory Number or Cellular Telephone Number). The Electronic Serial Number, a 12-digit number sent by the handset to the cellular system for billing purposes, uniquely identified that phone on the network. The system then allowed or disallowed calls and/or features based on its customer file. A person intercepting an ESN/MDN pair could clone the combination onto a different phone and use it in other areas to make calls without paying. | ||
Cellular [[phone cloning]] became possible with off-the-shelf technology in the 1990s. Would-be cloners required three key items : | Cellular [[phone cloning]] became possible with off-the-shelf technology in the 1990s. Would-be cloners required three key items: | ||
# A radio receiver, such as the Icom PCR-1000, that could tune into the Reverse Channel (the frequency on which AMPS phones transmit data to the tower) | # A radio receiver, such as the Icom PCR-1000, that could tune into the Reverse Channel (the frequency on which AMPS phones transmit data to the tower) | ||
| Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
The problem became so large that some carriers required the use of a [[Personal identification number|PIN]] before making calls. Eventually, the cellular companies initiated a system called RF Fingerprinting, whereby it could determine subtle differences in the signal of one phone from another and shut down some cloned phones. Some legitimate customers had problems with this though if they made certain changes to their own phone, such as replacing the battery and/or antenna. | The problem became so large that some carriers required the use of a [[Personal identification number|PIN]] before making calls. Eventually, the cellular companies initiated a system called RF Fingerprinting, whereby it could determine subtle differences in the signal of one phone from another and shut down some cloned phones. Some legitimate customers had problems with this though if they made certain changes to their own phone, such as replacing the battery and/or antenna. | ||
The Oki 900 could listen in to AMPS phone | The Oki 900 could listen in to AMPS phone calls right out of the box with no hardware modifications.<ref>Takedown, {{ISBN|0786862106}}, Tsutomu Shimomura John Markoff – Shimomura describes demonstrating a shrink-wrapped the Oki 900 during courtroom testimony</ref> | ||
==Standards== | ==Standards== | ||
AMPS was originally standardized by [[American National Standards Institute]] (ANSI) as EIA/TIA/IS-3. EIA/TIA/IS-3 was superseded by EIA/TIA-553 and TIA interim standard with digital technologies | AMPS was originally standardized by [[American National Standards Institute]] (ANSI) as EIA/TIA/IS-3. EIA/TIA/IS-3 was superseded by EIA/TIA-553 and TIA interim standard with digital technologies. The cost of wireless service became so low that [[phone cloning]], an illegal method to bypass call charges, has virtually disappeared.<ref>{{Cite book |title=International Implementation of Wireless Telecommunication Systems Compliant with TIA/EIA-41 |date=December 2002 |publisher=[[3rd Generation Partnership Project 2]] |edition=B |pages=1}}</ref> | ||
==Frequency bands== | ==Frequency bands== | ||
{{More citations needed section|date=March 2026}} | |||
AMPS cellular service operated in the 850 [[MHz]] [[Cellular frequencies|Cellular]] band. For each market area, the United States [[Federal Communications Commission]] (FCC) allowed two licensees (networks) known as "A" and "B" carriers. Each carrier within a market used a specified "block" of frequencies consisting of 21 control channels and 395 voice channels. Originally, the B (wireline) side license was usually owned by the local phone company, and the A (non-wireline) license was given to wireless telephone providers. | AMPS cellular service operated in the 850 [[MHz]] [[Cellular frequencies|Cellular]] band. For each market area, the United States [[Federal Communications Commission]] (FCC) allowed two licensees (networks) known as "A" and "B" carriers. Each carrier within a market used a specified "block" of frequencies consisting of 21 control channels and 395 voice channels. Originally, the B (wireline) side license was usually owned by the local phone company, and the A (non-wireline) license was given to wireless telephone providers. | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
Each duplex channel was composed of 2 [[frequency|frequencies]]. 416 of these were in the 824–849 MHz range for transmissions from mobile stations to the base stations, paired with 416 frequencies in the 869–894 MHz range for transmissions from base stations to the mobile stations. Each cell site used a different subset of these channels than its neighbors to avoid interference. This significantly reduced the number of channels available at each site in real-world systems. Each AMPS channel had a one way bandwidth of 30 kHz, for a total of 60 kHz for each duplex channel. | Each duplex channel was composed of 2 [[frequency|frequencies]]. 416 of these were in the 824–849 MHz range for transmissions from mobile stations to the base stations, paired with 416 frequencies in the 869–894 MHz range for transmissions from base stations to the mobile stations. Each cell site used a different subset of these channels than its neighbors to avoid interference. This significantly reduced the number of channels available at each site in real-world systems. Each AMPS channel had a one way bandwidth of 30 kHz, for a total of 60 kHz for each duplex channel. | ||
Laws were passed in the US which prohibited the FCC [[type acceptance]] and sale of any receiver which could tune the frequency ranges occupied by analog AMPS cellular services. | Laws were passed in the US which prohibited the FCC [[type acceptance]] and sale of any receiver which could tune the frequency ranges occupied by analog AMPS cellular services to prevent fraud and breach in privacy. Though the service is no longer offered, these laws remain in force (although they may no longer be enforced).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arrl.org/forum/topics/view/112 |work=Forum-General discussion about technology and policy |title=Why are cellular bands blocked on receivers? |publisher=Arrl.org |access-date=September 28, 2013}}</ref><ref>47cfr15.121 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2010/octqtr/47cfr15.121.htm and http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_home&id=cellular {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111026023132/http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_home&id=cellular |date=October 26, 2011 }}</ref> | ||
==Narrowband AMPS== | ==Narrowband AMPS== | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
==Digital AMPS== | ==Digital AMPS== | ||
{{main|Digital AMPS}} | {{main|Digital AMPS}} | ||
Later, many AMPS networks were partially converted to [[D-AMPS]], often referred to as '''TDMA''' ( | |||
Later, many AMPS networks were partially converted to [[D-AMPS]], often referred to as '''TDMA''' ([[time-division multiple access|TDMA]] is a generic term that applies to many 2G cellular systems). D-AMPS, commercially deployed since 1993,<ref>Anton A. Huurdeman, [https://books.google.com/books?id=SnjGRDVIUL4C&dq=d-amps+tia+history&pg=PA533 The Worldwide History of Telecommunications], John Wiley & Sons, 31 juli 2003, page 533</ref> was a [[Digital data|digital]], [[2G]] standard used mainly by [[AT&T Mobility]] and [[U.S. Cellular]] in the United States, [[Rogers Wireless]] in Canada, [[Telcel]] in Mexico, [[Telecom Italia Mobile]] (TIM) in Brazil, [[VimpelCom]] in Russia, [[Movilnet]] in Venezuela, and [[Cellcom (Israel)|Cellcom]] in Israel. In most areas, D-AMPS is no longer offered and have been replaced by more advanced digital wireless networks. | |||
==Successor technologies== | ==Successor technologies== | ||
AMPS and D-AMPS have now been phased out in favor of either [[CDMA2000]] or [[GSM]], which allow for higher capacity data transfers for services such as [[Wireless Application Protocol|WAP]], [[Multimedia Messaging System]] (MMS), and wireless Internet access. There are some phones capable of supporting AMPS, D-AMPS and GSM all in one phone (using the [[GAIT (wireless)|GAIT]] standard). | AMPS and D-AMPS have now been phased out in favor of either [[CDMA2000]] or [[GSM]], which allow for higher capacity data transfers for services such as [[Wireless Application Protocol|WAP]], [[Multimedia Messaging System]] (MMS), and wireless Internet access. There are some phones capable of supporting AMPS, D-AMPS and GSM all in one phone (using the [[GAIT (wireless)|GAIT]] standard).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ghayas |first=Adnan |date=November 7, 2019 |title=How are AMPS and D-AMPS different from GSM and CDMA? – Commsbrief |url=https://commsbrief.com/how-are-amps-and-d-amps-different-from-gsm-and-cdma/ |access-date=2026-03-18 |language=en-US}}</ref> | ||
== | |||
Unlike in the United States, the [[Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission]] (CRTC) and [[Industry Canada]] have not set any requirement for maintaining AMPS service in Canada. [[Rogers Wireless]] has dismantled their AMPS (along with [[IS-136]]) network; the networks were shut down May 31, 2007. [[Bell Mobility]] and [[Telus Mobility]], who operated AMPS networks in Canada, announced that they would observe the same timetable as outlined by the FCC in the United States, and as a result would not begin to dismantle their AMPS networks until after February 2008.<ref name="sptnews">{{cite web|url=http://www.sptnews.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=9 |title=SP&T News |publisher=Sptnews.ca |date=September 21, 2013 |access-date=September 28, 2013}}</ref> | Unlike in the United States, the [[Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission]] (CRTC) and [[Industry Canada]] have not set any requirement for maintaining AMPS service in Canada. [[Rogers Wireless]] has dismantled their AMPS (along with [[IS-136]]) network; the networks were shut down May 31, 2007. [[Bell Mobility]] and [[Telus Mobility]], who operated AMPS networks in Canada, announced that they would observe the same timetable as outlined by the FCC in the United States, and as a result would not begin to dismantle their AMPS networks until after February 2008.<ref name="sptnews">{{cite web|url=http://www.sptnews.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=9 |title=SP&T News |publisher=Sptnews.ca |date=September 21, 2013 |access-date=September 28, 2013}}</ref> | ||
[[OnStar]] relied heavily on North American AMPS service for its subscribers because, when the system was developed, AMPS offered the most comprehensive wireless coverage in the US. In 2006, [[ADT Security Services|ADT]] asked the FCC to extend the AMPS deadline due to many of their alarm systems still using analog technology to communicate with the control centers.<ref name="ITWorld">[http://wireless.itworld.com/4279/061004adt/page_1.html ITWorld] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061016114055/http://wireless.itworld.com/4279/061004adt/page_1.html |date=October 16, 2006 }}</ref> Cellular companies who own an A or B license (such as Verizon and Alltel) were required to provide analog service until February 18, 2008. After that point, however, most cellular companies were eager to shut down AMPS and use the remaining channels for digital services. | [[OnStar]] relied heavily on North American AMPS service for its subscribers because, when the system was developed, AMPS offered the most comprehensive wireless coverage in the US. In 2006, [[ADT Security Services|ADT]] asked the FCC to extend the AMPS deadline due to many of their alarm systems still using analog technology to communicate with the control centers.<ref name="ITWorld">[http://wireless.itworld.com/4279/061004adt/page_1.html ITWorld] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061016114055/http://wireless.itworld.com/4279/061004adt/page_1.html |date=October 16, 2006 }}</ref> Cellular companies who own an A or B license (such as Verizon and Alltel) were required to provide analog service until February 18, 2008. After that point, however, most cellular companies were eager to shut down AMPS and use the remaining channels for digital services. OnStar transitioned to digital service with the help of data transport technology developed by Airbiquity, but warned customers who could not be upgraded to digital service that their service would permanently expire on January 1, 2008.<ref name="OnStar">{{Cite web |title=Helpful Info {{!}} Analog-to-Digital Transition |url=http://www.onstar.com/us_english/jsp/explore/onstar_basics/helpful_info.jsp?info-view=tech_equip |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011215630/http://www.onstar.com/us_english/jsp/explore/onstar_basics/helpful_info.jsp?info-view=tech_equip |archive-date=October 11, 2007 |website=OnStar}}</ref> | ||
==Commercial deployments of AMPS by country== | ==Commercial deployments of AMPS by country== | ||
| Line 131: | Line 129: | ||
| | | | ||
|1986 | |1986 | ||
|2000 <ref>{{cite web |last1=Dickerson |first1=Mathew |title=Australia's mobile phone network has come a long way |url=https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6857507/cheers-to-more-than-30-years-for-our-mobile-phone-network/ |website=Canberra Times |access-date=2022-11-15}}</ref> | |2000 <ref>{{cite web |last1=Dickerson |first1=Mathew |title=Australia's mobile phone network has come a long way |url=https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6857507/cheers-to-more-than-30-years-for-our-mobile-phone-network/ |website=Canberra Times |date=July 30, 2020 |access-date=2022-11-15}}</ref> | ||
|<ref name=":1" /> | |<ref name=":1" /> | ||
[[Telstra]] (formerly Telecom Australia) – operated an AMPS network in Australia from February 1987 until the end of 2000. As part of the introduction of mobile phone competition in Australia, the Australian government mandated GSM as the new standard for mobile networks, and required that Telstra close the AMPS network by 2000. However, GSM base stations could only serve a limited area. While this was OK for Europe, it meant that GSM could not cover large, sparsely populated rural areas of Australia cost effectively. Telstra deployed a CDMA network, which did not suffer this limitation, and while the AMPS network was closed down at the end of 1999 in the major cities, the closure deadline was extended until the end of 2000 in rural areas to ease the transition to CDMA. The CDMA network has since been replaced by an 850 MHz UMTS network, [[Next G]]. | [[Telstra]] (formerly Telecom Australia) – operated an AMPS network in Australia from February 1987 until the end of 2000. As part of the introduction of mobile phone competition in Australia, the Australian government mandated GSM as the new standard for mobile networks, and required that Telstra close the AMPS network by 2000. However, GSM base stations could only serve a limited area. While this was OK for Europe, it meant that GSM could not cover large, sparsely populated rural areas of Australia cost effectively. Telstra deployed a CDMA network, which did not suffer this limitation, and while the AMPS network was closed down at the end of 1999 in the major cities, the closure deadline was extended until the end of 2000 in rural areas to ease the transition to CDMA. The CDMA network has since been replaced by an 850 MHz UMTS network, [[Next G]]. | ||
| Line 349: | Line 347: | ||
|1994 | |1994 | ||
| | | | ||
|<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/jfile/report/05001110/05001110_001_BUP_0.pdf |title=Cellular companies of Uzbekistan |date=January 25, 2006}}</ref> | |<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/jfile/report/05001110/05001110_001_BUP_0.pdf |title=Cellular companies of Uzbekistan |date=January 25, 2006 |access-date=January 9, 2023 |archive-date=October 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171007120349/https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/jfile/report/05001110/05001110_001_BUP_0.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
|} | |} | ||