Boeing 747: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ymblanter
Adding {{pp-vandalism}}
 
imported>Stepho-wrs
Further reading: Formatted book.
 
Line 8: Line 8:
| name = Boeing 747
| name = Boeing 747
| image = File:B-747 Iberia.jpg<!-- In flight images are preferable for the Infobox of aircraft. Discuss changes on the Talk page, thanks. -->
| image = File:B-747 Iberia.jpg<!-- In flight images are preferable for the Infobox of aircraft. Discuss changes on the Talk page, thanks. -->
| image_caption = A [[#747-200|Boeing 747-200]] operated by [[Iberia (airline)|Iberia]], 1980
| image_caption = A [[#747-200|Boeing 747-200]] operated by [[Iberia (airline)|Iberia]]
| alt = A 747-200 in Iberia livery in flight, over land
| alt = A 747-200 in Iberia livery in flight, over land
| aircraft_type = [[Wide-body aircraft|Wide-body]] [[jet airliner]]
| aircraft_type = [[Wide-body aircraft|Wide-body]] [[jet airliner]]
| national_origin = United States
| national_origin = United States
| manufacturer = [[Boeing Commercial Airplanes]]
| manufacturer = [[Boeing Commercial Airplanes]]
| first_flight = {{Start date and age|1969|02|09}}
| first_flight = {{Start date and age|p=y|1969|02|09}}
| introduction = {{Start date|1970|01|22}}, with [[Pan Am]]
| introduction = {{Start date|1970|01|22}}, with [[Pan Am]]
| status = In cargo service; in limited passenger service
| status = In cargo service; in limited passenger service
Line 25: Line 25:
| number_built = {{formatnum:{{#expr:1573+1}}}} (inc [[N7470]] prototype)<!-- Boeing built, but never "delivered" the prototype (N7470) to a customer, so it is not included in the company's official "orders and deliveries" number of 1,573. -->
| number_built = {{formatnum:{{#expr:1573+1}}}} (inc [[N7470]] prototype)<!-- Boeing built, but never "delivered" the prototype (N7470) to a customer, so it is not included in the company's official "orders and deliveries" number of 1,573. -->
| variants = {{Plain list|
| variants = {{Plain list|
* [[Boeing 747 Supertanker]]
* [[Boeing 747-400]]
* [[Boeing 747-400]]
* [[Boeing 747-8]]
* [[Boeing 747-8]]
*[[Boeing E-4]]
* [[Boeing 747SP]]
*[[Boeing VC-25]]
* [[Boeing E-4]]
* [[Boeing VC-25]]
}}
}}
| developed_into = {{Plain list|
| developed_into = {{Plain list|
* [[Boeing 747SP]]
* [[Boeing 747 Supertanker]]
* [[Boeing Dreamlifter]]
* [[Boeing Dreamlifter]]
* [[Boeing YAL-1]]
* [[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]]
* [[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]]
}}
}}
Line 40: Line 41:
The '''Boeing 747''' is a long-range [[wide-body aircraft|wide-body airliner]] designed and manufactured by [[Boeing Commercial Airplanes]] in the United States between 1968 and 2023.
The '''Boeing 747''' is a long-range [[wide-body aircraft|wide-body airliner]] designed and manufactured by [[Boeing Commercial Airplanes]] in the United States between 1968 and 2023.
<!--Development-->
<!--Development-->
After the introduction of the [[Boeing 707|707]] in October 1958, [[Pan Am]] wanted a jet {{frac|2|1|2}} times its size, to reduce its [[seat cost]] by 30%.<!-- see Time7Dec1998--> In 1965, [[Joe Sutter]] left the [[Boeing 737|737]] development program to design the 747. In April 1966, Pan Am ordered 25 Boeing 747-100 aircraft, and in late 1966, [[Pratt & Whitney]] agreed to develop the [[JT9D]] engine, a [[high-bypass turbofan]]. On September 30, 1968, the first 747 was rolled out of the custom-built [[Everett Plant]], the world's [[List of largest buildings#Largest usable volume|largest building by volume]]. The 747's first flight took place on February 9, 1969, and the 747 was certified in December of that year. It entered service with Pan Am on January 22, 1970. The 747 was the first airplane called a "[[Jumbo Jet]]"<!-- See talk. The nickname "Jumbo Jet" was first explicitly coined with the introduction of the Boeing 747, although in contemporary lay use, "jumbo jet" may be attributed to any "large jet airplane with a seating capacity of several hundred passengers", according to the ''Shorter Oxford English Dictionary''. --> as the first [[wide-body airliner]].  
It was conceived in response to the demand of [[Pan Am]] for a jet {{frac|2|1|2}} times the size of the [[Boeing 707|707]], which had been introduced in October 1958, to reduce the airline's [[seat cost]] by 30%.<!-- see Time7Dec1998--> The design team was led by [[Joe Sutter]], who left the [[Boeing 737|737]] development program in 1965 to design the 747. In April 1966, Pan Am ordered 25 Boeing 747-100 aircraft, and in late 1966, [[Pratt & Whitney]] agreed to develop the [[JT9D]] engine, a [[high-bypass turbofan]]. On September 30, 1968, the first 747 was rolled out of the custom-built [[Everett Plant]], the world's [[List of largest buildings#Largest usable volume|largest building by volume]]. The 747's first flight took place on February 9, 1969, and the 747 was certified in December 1969. It entered service with Pan Am on January 22, 1970. The 747 was the first airplane called a "[[Jumbo Jet]]"<!-- See talk. The nickname "Jumbo Jet" was first explicitly coined with the introduction of the Boeing 747, although in contemporary lay use, "jumbo jet" may be attributed to any "large jet airplane with a seating capacity of several hundred passengers", according to the ''Shorter Oxford English Dictionary''. --> as the first [[wide-body airliner]].  


<!--Design-->
<!--Design-->
Line 46: Line 47:


<!--variants-->
<!--variants-->
Boeing introduced the -200 in 1971, with uprated engines for a heavier [[maximum takeoff weight]] (MTOW) of {{Convert|833000|lb|t|abbr=out}} from the initial {{Convert|735000|lb|t|abbr=out}}, increasing the maximum range from {{Convert|4620|to|6560|nmi|abbr=~|lk=in}}. It was shortened for the longer-range [[747SP]] in 1976, and the 747-300 followed in 1983 with a stretched upper deck for up to 400 seats in three classes. The heavier [[747-400]] with improved RB211 and CF6 engines or the new [[PW4000]] engine (the JT9D successor), and a two-crew [[glass cockpit]], was introduced in 1989 and is the most common variant. After several studies, the stretched [[747-8]] was launched on November 14, 2005, using the [[General Electric GEnx]] engine first developed for the [[787 Dreamliner]] (the inspiration for the -8 in the name), and was first delivered in October 2011. The 747 is the basis for several government and military variants, such as the [[VC-25]] ([[Air Force One]]), [[Boeing E-4|E-4]] Emergency Airborne Command Post, [[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]], and some experimental test aircraft such as the [[Boeing YAL-1|YAL-1]] and [[Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy|SOFIA]] airborne observatory.
Boeing introduced the 747-200 in 1971, with uprated engines for a heavier [[maximum takeoff weight]] (MTOW) of {{Convert|833000|lb|t|abbr=out}} from the initial {{Convert|735000|lb|t|abbr=out}}, increasing the maximum range from {{Convert|4620|to|6560|nmi|abbr=~|lk=in}}. It was shortened for the longer-range [[747SP]] in 1976, and the 747-300 followed in 1983 with a stretched upper deck for up to 400 seats in three classes. The heavier [[747-400]] with improved RB211 and CF6 engines or the new [[PW4000]] engine (the JT9D successor), and a two-crew [[glass cockpit]], was introduced in 1989 and is the most common variant. After several studies, the stretched [[747-8]] was launched on November 14, 2005, using the [[General Electric GEnx]] engine first developed for the [[787 Dreamliner]] (the inspiration for the -8 in the name), and was first delivered in October 2011. The 747 is the basis for several government and military variants, such as the [[VC-25]] ([[Air Force One]]), [[Boeing E-4|E-4]] Emergency Airborne Command Post, [[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]], and some experimental test aircraft such as the [[Boeing YAL-1|YAL-1]] and [[Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy|SOFIA]] airborne observatory.


<!-- Operators and see NYT Jan2023 -->
<!-- Operators and see NYT Jan2023 -->
Initial competition came from the smaller [[trijet]] widebodies: the [[Lockheed L-1011]] (introduced in 1972), [[McDonnell Douglas DC-10]] (1971) and later [[MD-11]] (1990). [[Airbus]] competed with later variants with the heaviest versions of the [[A340]] until surpassing the 747 in size with the [[A380]], delivered between 2007 and 2021. Freighter variants of the 747 remain popular with cargo airlines. The final 747 was delivered to [[Atlas Air]] in January 2023 after a 54-year production run, with 1,574 aircraft built.
Initial competition came from the smaller [[trijet]] widebodies: the [[Lockheed L-1011]] (introduced in 1972), [[McDonnell Douglas DC-10]] (1971) and later [[MD-11]] (1990). [[Airbus]] competed with later variants with the heaviest versions of the [[A340]] until surpassing the 747 in size with the [[A380]], delivered between 2007 and 2021. These later variants of the 747 also faced internal competition from, and were ultimately superseded by, larger variants of the [[Boeing 777]], such as the [[Boeing 777-300ER|777-300ER]]<ref name="77W">{{cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/demand-rises-for-fuel-saver-777/story-e6frg95x-1111116616439 |title=Boeing under pressure as demand rises for fuel-saver 777 |work=[[The Australian]]|date=June 13, 2008 |access-date=June 20, 2008 |archive-date=April 30, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140430133813/http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/demand-rises-for-fuel-saver-777/story-e6frg95x-1111116616439 |url-status=live}}</ref> and [[Boeing 777-9|777-9]]<ref name="renamed_from_779_on_20260529091700">{{cite news |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/boeing-quietly-unveiled-777x-replace-747-jumbo-jet-2019-3 |title=Boeing quietly unveiled the $442 million airliner that will replace the 747 jumbo jet |first=Benjamin |last=Zhang |work=Business Insider |date=2019-03-21 |access-date=2026-05-31}}</ref>. Freighter variants of the 747 remain popular with cargo airlines. The final 747 was delivered to [[Atlas Air]] in January 2023 after a 54-year production run, with 1,574 aircraft built.
<!--Accidents and incidents-->{{As of|2023|12|df=US}}, 64 Boeing 747s ({{#expr:64/15.74round1}}%) have been [[Boeing 747 hull losses|lost]] in [[Aviation accidents and incidents|accidents and incidents]], in which a total of 3,746 people have died.<!-- see ASNstats-->
<!--Accidents and incidents-->{{As of|2025|10|df=US}}, 65 Boeing 747s ({{#expr:64/15.74round1}}%) have been [[Boeing 747 hull losses|lost]] in [[Aviation accidents and incidents|accidents and incidents]], in which a total of 3,746 people have died.<!-- see ASNstats-->


== Development ==
== Development ==


=== Background ===
=== Background ===
[[File:A drawing of a Boeing 747 Combi from SAS with cargo on the half of the main deck - 1970's.jpg|thumb|alt=A drawing of a Boeing 747 Combi from SAS with cargo on the half of the main deck - 1970's|[[Cutaway drawing]] of a [[Scandinavian Airlines]] 747-200M Combi showcasing the 747's freight carrying capabilities]]
[[File:AirBridgeCargo Airlines Boeing 747-200F nose loading door open and cargo loader at Sheremetyevo International Airport.jpg|thumb|Cargo nose door open with cargo loader]]
[[File:AirBridgeCargo Airlines Boeing 747-200F nose loading door open and cargo loader at Sheremetyevo International Airport.jpg|thumb|Cargo nose door open with cargo loader]]


In 1963, the [[United States Air Force]] began a series of study projects on a very large strategic transport aircraft. Although the [[C-141 Starlifter]] was being introduced, officials believed that a much larger and more capable aircraft was needed, especially to carry cargo that would not fit in any existing aircraft. These studies led to initial requirements for the CX-Heavy Logistics System (CX-HLS) in March 1964 for an aircraft with a load capacity of {{convert|180000|lb|t|sigfig=3}} and a speed of Mach 0.75 ({{convert|500|mph|kn km/h|sigfig=2|abbr=on|disp=out}}), and an unrefueled range of {{convert|5000|nmi|sigfig=2}} with a payload of {{convert |115000|lb|t|sigfig=3}}. The payload bay had to be {{convert|17|ft|m|sigfig=3}} wide by {{convert|13.5|ft|m|sigfig=3}} high and {{convert|100|ft|m|sigfig=2}} long with access through doors at the front and rear.<ref name="Norton_C-5">Norton 2003, pp. 5–12.</ref>
In 1963, the [[United States Air Force]] (USAF) began a series of study projects on an extremely large strategic transport aircraft. Although the [[C-141 Starlifter]] was being introduced, officials believed that a much larger and more capable aircraft was needed, especially to carry cargo that would not fit in any existing aircraft. These studies led to initial requirements for the CX-Heavy Logistics System (CX-HLS) in March 1964 for an aircraft with a load capacity of {{convert|180000|lb|t|sigfig=3}} and a speed of Mach 0.75 ({{convert|500|mph|kn km/h|sigfig=2|abbr=on|disp=out}}), and an unrefueled range of {{convert|5000|nmi|sigfig=2}} with a payload of {{convert |115000|lb|t|sigfig=3}}. The payload bay had to be {{convert|17|ft|m|sigfig=3}} wide by {{convert|13.5|ft|m|sigfig=3}} high and {{convert|100|ft|m|sigfig=2}} long with access through doors at the front and rear.<ref name="Norton_C-5">Norton 2003, pp. 5–12.</ref>


The desire to keep the number of engines to four required new engine designs with greatly increased power and better fuel economy. In May 1964, airframe proposals arrived from Boeing, [[Douglas Aircraft Company|Douglas]], [[General Dynamics]], [[Lockheed Corporation|Lockheed]], and [[Martin Marietta]]; engine proposals were submitted by [[GE Aerospace|General Electric]], [[Curtiss-Wright]], and [[Pratt & Whitney]]. Boeing, Douglas, and Lockheed were given additional study contracts for the airframe, along with General Electric and Pratt & Whitney for the engines.<ref name= "Norton_C-5" />
The desire to keep the number of engines to four required new engine designs with greatly increased power and better fuel economy. In May 1964, airframe proposals arrived from Boeing, [[Douglas Aircraft Company|Douglas]], [[General Dynamics]], [[Lockheed Corporation|Lockheed]], and [[Martin Marietta]]; engine proposals were submitted by [[GE Aerospace|General Electric]], [[Curtiss-Wright]], and [[Pratt & Whitney]]. Boeing, Douglas, and Lockheed were given additional study contracts for the airframe, along with General Electric and Pratt & Whitney for the engines.<ref name= "Norton_C-5" />


The airframe proposals shared several features. As the CX-HLS needed to be able to be loaded from the front, a door had to be included where the cockpit usually was. All of the companies solved this problem by moving the cockpit above the cargo area; Douglas had a small "pod" just forward and above the wing, Lockheed used a long "spine" running the length of the aircraft with the wing spar passing through it, while Boeing blended the two, with a longer pod that ran from just behind the nose to just behind the wing.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20141014202050/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-cx-hls-model-196364/19149 Boeing CX-HLS Model], Boeing Corporate Archives, 1963/64.<br />[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/gallery/view.html?b_bbs_id=10044&num=169918 Models of Boeing C-5A proposal and Lockheed's] (Korean); [http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/bbs/view.html?b_bbs_id=10050&num=4082 next page].</ref><ref>[http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214134934/http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html |date=December 14, 2007}} ''NASA'', 2000, see images in "Langley Contributions to the C-5". Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> In 1965, Lockheed's aircraft design and General Electric's engine design were selected for the new [[C-5 Galaxy]] transport, which was the largest military aircraft in the world at the time.<ref name= "Norton_C-5" /> Boeing carried the nose door and raised cockpit concepts over to the design of the 747.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|pages=12-13}}
The airframe proposals shared several features. As the CX-HLS needed to be able to be loaded from the front, a door had to be included where the cockpit usually was. All of the companies solved this problem by moving the cockpit above the cargo area; Douglas had a small "pod" just forward and above the wing, Lockheed used a long "spine" running the length of the aircraft with the wing spar passing through it, while Boeing blended the two, with a longer pod that ran from just behind the nose to just behind the wing.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20141014202050/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-cx-hls-model-196364/19149 Boeing CX-HLS Model], Boeing Corporate Archives, 1963/64.<br />[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/gallery/view.html?b_bbs_id=10044&num=169918 Models of Boeing C-5A proposal and Lockheed's] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160912221855/http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/gallery/view.html?b_bbs_id=10044&num=169918 |date=September 12, 2016 }} (Korean); [http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/bbs/view.html?b_bbs_id=10050&num=4082 next page].</ref><ref>[http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214134934/http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html |date=December 14, 2007}} ''NASA'', 2000, see images in "Langley Contributions to the C-5". Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> In 1965, Lockheed's aircraft design and General Electric's engine design were selected for the new [[C-5 Galaxy]] transport, which was the largest military aircraft in the world at the time.<ref name= "Norton_C-5" /> Boeing carried the nose door and raised cockpit concepts over to the design of the 747.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|pages=12-13}}


=== Airliner proposal ===
=== Proposal ===
The 747 was conceived while air travel was increasing in the 1960s.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=13}} The era of commercial jet transportation, led by the enormous popularity of the [[Boeing 707]] and [[Douglas DC-8]], had revolutionized long-distance travel.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=13}}<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing Multimedia Image Gallery 707 |url= http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery/images/commercial/707-03.html |url-status=dead |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20120111124513/http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery/images/commercial/707-03.html |archive-date=January 11, 2012 |access-date=December 8, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> In this growing jet age, [[Juan Trippe]], president of [[Pan Am|Pan American Airways]] (Pan Am), one of Boeing's most important airline customers, asked for a new jet airliner {{frac|2|1|2}} times size of the 707, with a 30% lower cost per unit of passenger-distance and the capability to offer mass air travel on international routes.<ref name="Time7Dec1998">{{Cite magazine |last=Branson |first=Richard |date=December 7, 1998 |title=Pilot of the Jet Age |url=https://content.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,989780,00.html |magazine=Time|access-date=December 11, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221211231535/https://content.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,989780,00.html|archive-date=December 11, 2022|url-status=live}}</ref> Trippe also thought that airport congestion could be addressed by a larger new aircraft.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Innovators: Juan Trippe |url=http://www.pbs.org/kcet/chasingthesun/innovators/jtrippe.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060508065647/http://www.pbs.org/kcet/chasingthesun/innovators/jtrippe.html |archive-date=May 8, 2006 |website=Chasing the Sun |publisher=PBS}}</ref>
The 747 was conceived while air travel was increasing in the 1960s.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=13}} The era of commercial jet transportation, led by the enormous popularity of the [[Boeing 707]] and [[Douglas DC-8]], had revolutionized long-distance travel.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=13}}<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing Multimedia Image Gallery 707 |url= http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery/images/commercial/707-03.html |url-status=dead |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20120111124513/http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery/images/commercial/707-03.html |archive-date=January 11, 2012 |access-date=December 8, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> In this growing jet age, [[Juan Trippe]], president of [[Pan Am|Pan American Airways]] (Pan Am), one of Boeing's most important airline customers, asked for a new jet airliner {{frac|2|1|2}} times size of the 707, with a 30% lower cost per unit of passenger-distance and the capability to offer mass air travel on international routes.<ref name="Time7Dec1998">{{Cite magazine |last=Branson |first=Richard |date=December 7, 1998 |title=Pilot of the Jet Age |url=https://content.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,989780,00.html |magazine=Time|access-date=December 11, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221211231535/https://content.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,989780,00.html|archive-date=December 11, 2022|url-status=live}}</ref> Trippe also thought that airport congestion could be addressed by a larger aircraft.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Innovators: Juan Trippe |url=http://www.pbs.org/kcet/chasingthesun/innovators/jtrippe.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060508065647/http://www.pbs.org/kcet/chasingthesun/innovators/jtrippe.html |archive-date=May 8, 2006 |website=Chasing the Sun |publisher=PBS}}</ref>


[[File:Iran Air Boeing 747-200 cockpit Sharifi.jpg|thumb|An [[Iran Air]] 747-200, showing an early-production 747 cockpit with a [[flight engineer]], located on the upper deck |alt= A view of an early-production 747 cockpit]]
[[File:Iran Air Boeing 747-200 cockpit Sharifi.jpg|thumb|An [[Iran Air]] 747-200, showing an early-production 747 cockpit with a [[flight engineer]], located on the upper deck |alt= A view of an early-production 747 cockpit]]
In 1965, [[Joe Sutter]] was transferred from Boeing's [[Boeing 737|737]] development team to manage the design studies for the new airliner, already assigned the model number 747.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=80-84}} Sutter began a design study with Pan Am and other airlines to better understand their requirements. At the time, many thought that long-range subsonic airliners would eventually be superseded by [[supersonic transport]] aircraft.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/852087.stm "Air travel, a supersonic future?"]. ''[[BBC News]]'', July 17, 2001. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.</ref> Boeing responded by designing the 747 so it could be adapted easily to carry freight and remain in production even if sales of the passenger version declined.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Slutsken |first=Howard |date=2017-11-07 |title=How Boeing's 747 jumbo jet changed travel |url=https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/boeing-747-jumbo-jet-travel/index.html |access-date=2024-02-08 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref>


In April 1966, Pan Am ordered 25 Boeing 747-100 aircraft for US$525&nbsp;million<ref name="fntst">{{Cite news |date=April 14, 1966 |title=490-seat jetliner ordered |page=1 |work=Lewiston Morning Tribune |agency=Associated Press |location=Idaho |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=CLBeAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gy8MAAAAIBAJ&pg=4192%2C2341962}}</ref><ref name="paogj">{{Cite news |date=April 14, 1966 |title=Pan Am orders giant jets |page=A1 |work=Deseret News |agency=UPI |location=Salt Lake City, Utah |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PthSAAAAIBAJ&sjid=4X8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=6426%2C3018040}}</ref> (equivalent to ${{Inflation|US-GDP|.525|1966|fmt=c|r=1}} billion in {{Inflation-year|US-GDP}} dollars). During the ceremonial 747 contract-signing banquet in Seattle on Boeing's 50th Anniversary, Juan Trippe predicted that the 747 would be "…a great weapon for peace, competing with [[Intercontinental ballistic missile|intercontinental missiles]] for mankind's destiny".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Simons |first=Graham |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rfpsBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA31 |title=The Airbus A380: A History |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-78303-041-5 |page=31|publisher=Pen and Sword }}</ref> As launch customer,<ref name="ucfc747">Rumerman, Judy. [https://web.archive.org/web/20121007143215/http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/Boeing_747/Aero21.htm "The Boeing 747"]. ''U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission,'' 2003. Retrieved: April 30, 2006.</ref><ref name="infoplease">Noland, David. [http://www.infoplease.com/spot/boeing747.html "Passenger Planes: Boeing 747."] "Info please" (''[[Pearson Education]]''). Retrieved: April 30, 2006.</ref> and because of its early involvement before placing a formal order, Pan Am was able to influence the design and development of the 747 to an extent unmatched by a single airline before or since.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=359}}
In 1965, [[Joe Sutter]] was transferred from Boeing's [[Boeing 737|737]] development team to manage the design studies for the new airliner, already assigned the model number 747.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=80-84}} Sutter began a study with Pan Am and other airlines to better understand their requirements. At the time, many thought that long-range subsonic airliners would eventually be superseded by [[supersonic transport]] aircraft.<ref>[https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/852087.stm "Air travel, a supersonic future?"]. ''[[BBC News]]'', July 17, 2001. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.</ref> Boeing responded by designing the 747 so it could be easily adapted to carry freight and remain in production even if sales of the passenger version declined.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Slutsken |first=Howard |date=2017-11-07 |title=How Boeing's 747 jumbo jet changed travel |url=https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/boeing-747-jumbo-jet-travel/index.html |access-date=2024-02-08 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref>


=== Design effort ===
In April 1966, Pan Am ordered 25 Boeing 747-100 aircraft for US$525&nbsp;million<ref name="fntst">{{Cite news |date=April 14, 1966 |title=490-seat jetliner ordered |page=1 |work=Lewiston Morning Tribune |agency=Associated Press |location=Idaho |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=CLBeAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gy8MAAAAIBAJ&pg=4192%2C2341962}}</ref><ref name="paogj">{{Cite news |date=April 14, 1966 |title=Pan Am orders giant jets |page=A1 |work=Deseret News |agency=UPI |location=Salt Lake City, Utah |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PthSAAAAIBAJ&sjid=4X8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=6426%2C3018040}}</ref> (equivalent to ${{Inflation|US-GDP|.525|1966|fmt=c|r=1}} billion in {{Inflation-year|US-GDP}} dollars). During the ceremonial 747 contract-signing banquet in Seattle on Boeing's 50th Anniversary, Juan Trippe predicted that the 747 would be "…a great weapon for peace, competing with [[Intercontinental ballistic missile|intercontinental missiles]] for mankind's destiny".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Simons |first=Graham |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rfpsBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA31 |title=The Airbus A380: A History |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-78303-041-5 |page=31|publisher=Pen and Sword }}</ref> As launch customer,<ref name="ucfc747">Rumerman, Judy. [https://web.archive.org/web/20121007143215/http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/Boeing_747/Aero21.htm "The Boeing 747"]. ''U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission,'' 2003. Retrieved: April 30, 2006.</ref><ref name="infoplease">Noland, David. [http://www.infoplease.com/spot/boeing747.html "Passenger Planes: Boeing 747."] "Info please" (''[[Pearson Education]]''). Retrieved: April 30, 2006.</ref> and because of its early involvement before placing a formal order, Pan Am was able to influence the design and development of the 747 to an extent unmatched by a single airline before or since.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=359}} Once additional orders for the aircraft were filed by [[Japan Airlines]] and [[Lufthansa]], approval for production of the 747 was given in July 1966.{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|page=76}}
Ultimately, the high-winged CX-HLS Boeing design was not used for the 747, although technologies developed for their bid had an influence.<ref>[http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214134934/http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html |date=December 14, 2007}} ''NASA'', 2000. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> The original design included a full-length double-deck fuselage with eight-across seating and two aisles on the lower deck and seven-across seating and two aisles on the upper deck.<ref>[http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-double-decker-early-proposed-design-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19091 Boeing 747 "Double Decker" Early Proposed Design Model at Boeing Corporate Archives – mid-to-late 1960s] {{webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150512211307/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-double-decker-early-proposed-design-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19091 |date=May 12, 2015}}<br />[http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-early-proposed-designs-models-mid-to-late-1960s/19093 (alternate image)] {{webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150512213456/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-early-proposed-designs-models-mid-to-late-1960s/19093 |date=May 12, 2015}}</ref>{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=282}} However, concern over evacuation routes and limited cargo-carrying capability caused this idea to be scrapped in early 1966 in favor of a wider single deck design.<ref name=ucfc747 /> The cockpit was therefore placed on a shortened upper deck so that a freight-loading door could be included in the nose cone; this design feature produced the 747's distinctive "hump".{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=93}} In early models, what to do with the small space in the pod behind the cockpit was not clear, and this was initially specified as a "lounge" area with no permanent seating.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=17}} (A different configuration that had been considered to keep the flight deck out of the way for freight loading had the pilots below the passengers, and was dubbed the "anteater".)<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-anteater-early-proposed-designs-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19088 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150616121707/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-anteater-early-proposed-designs-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19088 |url-status=dead |title= Airwaysnews Resources and Information |archive-date=June 16, 2015|website=airwaysnews.com}}</ref>
 
=== Initial design ===
Ultimately, the high-winged CX-HLS Boeing design was not used for the 747, although technologies developed for their bid had an influence.<ref>[http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214134934/http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/C_5.html |date=December 14, 2007}} ''NASA'', 2000. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> The original design included a full-length double-deck fuselage with eight-across seating and two aisles on the lower deck and seven-across seating and two aisles on the upper deck.<ref>[http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-double-decker-early-proposed-design-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19091 Boeing 747 "Double Decker" Early Proposed Design Model at Boeing Corporate Archives – mid-to-late 1960s] {{webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150512211307/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-double-decker-early-proposed-design-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19091 |date=May 12, 2015}}<br />[http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-early-proposed-designs-models-mid-to-late-1960s/19093 (alternate image)] {{webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150512213456/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-early-proposed-designs-models-mid-to-late-1960s/19093 |date=May 12, 2015}}</ref>{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=282}} However, concern over evacuation routes and limited cargo-carrying capability caused this idea to be scrapped in early 1966 in favor of a wider single deck design.<ref name=ucfc747 /> The cockpit was therefore placed on a shortened upper deck so that a freight-loading door could be included in the nose cone; this feature produced the 747's distinctive "hump".{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=93}} In early models, what to do with the small space in the pod behind the cockpit was not clear, and it was initially specified as a "lounge" area with no permanent seating.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=17}} (A different configuration that had been considered to keep the flight deck out of the way for freight loading had the pilots below the passengers, and was dubbed the "anteater".)<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-anteater-early-proposed-designs-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19088 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150616121707/http://airwaysnews.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-747-anteater-early-proposed-designs-model-mid-to-late-1960s/19088 |url-status=dead |title= Airwaysnews Resources and Information |archive-date=June 16, 2015|website=airwaysnews.com}}</ref>


[[File:JT9D on 747.JPG|thumb|The [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]] high-bypass turbofan engine was developed for the 747.|alt=The Pratt & Whitney JT9D turbofan suspended under the wing pylon of the 747 prototype. It is stripped of its outer casing, revealing the engine's core at The Museum of Flight in Seattle, WA]]
[[File:JT9D on 747.JPG|thumb|The [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]] high-bypass turbofan engine was developed for the 747.|alt=The Pratt & Whitney JT9D turbofan suspended under the wing pylon of the 747 prototype. It is stripped of its outer casing, revealing the engine's core at The Museum of Flight in Seattle, WA]]
One of the principal technologies that enabled an aircraft as large as the 747 to be drawn up was the [[High-bypass turbofan engine#High-bypass turbofan|high-bypass turbofan engine]].<ref name="Mecham">Mecham, M. "In review: 747, Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation." ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'', Vol. 165, No. 9, September 4, 2006, p. 53.</ref> This engine technology was thought to be capable of delivering double the power of the earlier [[turbojet]]s while consuming one-third less fuel. General Electric had pioneered the concept but was committed to developing the engine for the C-5 Galaxy and did not enter the commercial market until later.<ref>[http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/cf6/history.html "GE Aviation: CF6."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071217151126/http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/cf6/history.html |date=December 17, 2007}} ''GE Aviation''. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.</ref><ref name="me_100yrs">Colson, Michael S. [http://www.memagazine.org/supparch/flight03/jetsfans/jetsfans.html "Mechanical Engineering 100 Years of Flight."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071226032720/http://www.memagazine.org/supparch/flight03/jetsfans/jetsfans.html |date=December 26, 2007}} memagazine.org. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.</ref> Pratt & Whitney was also working on the same principle and, by late 1966, Boeing, Pan Am and Pratt & Whitney agreed to develop a new engine, designated the [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D|JT9D]] to power the 747.<ref name=me_100yrs />


The project was designed with a new methodology called [[fault tree analysis]], which allowed the effects of a failure of a single part to be studied to determine its impact on other systems.<ref name=ucfc747 /> To address concerns about safety and flyability, the 747's design included structural redundancy, redundant [[Hydraulic machinery|hydraulic]] systems, quadruple main landing gear and dual control surfaces.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=121, 128-131}} Additionally, some of the most advanced [[high-lift device]]s used in the industry were included in the new design, to allow it to operate from existing airports. These included [[Krueger flap]]s running almost the entire length of the wing's leading edge, as well as complex three-part slotted [[Flap (aircraft)|flaps]] along the trailing edge of the wing.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=25-26}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rudolph |first=Peter |date=September 1996 |title=High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners |url= https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960052267.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960052267.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |publisher= NASA |access-date=September 16, 2019 |website=ntrs.nasa.gov}}</ref> The wing's complex three-part flaps increase wing area by 21% and lift by 90% when fully deployed compared to their non-deployed configuration.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=19}}
One of the principal technologies that enabled an aircraft as large as the 747 was the [[High-bypass turbofan engine#High-bypass turbofan|high-bypass turbofan engine]].<ref name="Mecham">Mecham, M. "In review: 747, Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation." ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'', Vol. 165, No. 9, September 4, 2006, p. 53.</ref> This engine technology was thought to be capable of delivering twice the power of the earlier [[turbojet]]s while consuming one-third less fuel. General Electric had pioneered the concept but was committed to developing the engine for the C-5 Galaxy and did not enter the commercial market until later.<ref>[http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/cf6/history.html "GE Aviation: CF6."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071217151126/http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/cf6/history.html |date=December 17, 2007}} ''GE Aviation''. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.</ref><ref name="me_100yrs">Colson, Michael S. [http://www.memagazine.org/supparch/flight03/jetsfans/jetsfans.html "Mechanical Engineering 100 Years of Flight."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071226032720/http://www.memagazine.org/supparch/flight03/jetsfans/jetsfans.html |date=December 26, 2007}} memagazine.org. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.</ref> Pratt & Whitney was also working on the same principle and, by late 1966, Boeing, Pan Am and Pratt & Whitney agreed to develop a new engine, designated the [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D|JT9D]] to power the 747.<ref name=me_100yrs />


Boeing agreed to deliver the first 747 to Pan Am by the end of 1969. The delivery date left 28 months to design the aircraft, which was two-thirds of the normal time.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=96-97}} The schedule was so fast-paced that the people who worked on it were given the nickname "The Incredibles".{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=19}} Developing the aircraft was such a technical and financial challenge that management was said to have "bet the company" when it started the project.<ref name=ucfc747 /> Due to its massive size, Boeing subcontracted the assembly of subcomponents to other manufacturers, most notably [[Northrop Corporation|Northrop]] and [[Grumman]] (later merged into [[Northrop Grumman]] in 1994) for fuselage parts and trailing edge flaps respectively, [[Fairchild Aircraft|Fairchild]] for tailplane ailerons,<ref>Seo 1984, p. 40.</ref> and [[Ling-Temco-Vought]] (LTV) for the empennage.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=132}}<ref name="NorthropGrumman">{{Cite web|url=https://www.flightglobal.com/747-cut-forces-northrop-grumman-to-take-pre-tax-charge/24723.article|title=747 cut forces Northrop Grumman to take pre-tax charge|publisher=FlightGlobal|date=13 January 1999|access-date=August 24, 2023}}</ref>
The project was designed with a new methodology called [[fault tree analysis]], which allowed the effects of a failure of a single part to be studied to determine its impact on other systems.<ref name=ucfc747 /> To address concerns about safety and flyability, the 747's design included structural redundancy, redundant [[Hydraulic machinery|hydraulic]] systems, quadruple main landing gear and dual control surfaces.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=121, 128-131}} Additionally, some of the most advanced [[high-lift device]]s used in the industry were included in the new design, to allow it to operate from existing airports. These included [[Krueger flap]]s running almost the entire length of the wing's leading edge, as well as complex three-part slotted [[Flap (aircraft)|flaps]] along the trailing edge of the wing.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=25-26}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rudolph |first=Peter |date=September 1996 |title=High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners |url= https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960052267.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960052267.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |publisher= NASA |access-date=September 16, 2019 |journal=NASA Contractor Report |bibcode=1996ntrs.rept52267R }}</ref> The wing's complex three-part flaps increased wing area by 21% and lift by 90% when fully deployed compared to their non-deployed configuration.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=19}}


=== Production plant ===
Boeing agreed to deliver the first 747 to Pan Am by the end of 1969. That date left 28 months to design the aircraft, just two-thirds of the normal time.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=96-97}} The schedule was so fast-paced that the people who worked on it were given the nickname "The Incredibles".{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=19}} Developing the aircraft was such a technical and financial challenge that management was said to have "bet the company" when it started the project.<ref name=ucfc747 /> Due to its large size, Boeing subcontracted the assembly of subcomponents to other manufacturers, notably [[Northrop Corporation|Northrop]] and [[Grumman]] (later merged into [[Northrop Grumman]] in 1994) for fuselage parts and trailing edge flaps respectively,{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=132}} [[Fairchild Aircraft|Fairchild]] for tailplane ailerons,{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=40}} and [[Ling-Temco-Vought]] (LTV) for the empennage.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=132}}<ref name="NorthropGrumman">{{Cite web|url=https://www.flightglobal.com/747-cut-forces-northrop-grumman-to-take-pre-tax-charge/24723.article|title=747 cut forces Northrop Grumman to take pre-tax charge|publisher=FlightGlobal|date=13 January 1999|access-date=August 24, 2023}}</ref> For the 747SP, assembly was subcontracted to Japanese companies comprising [[Mitsubishi Heavy Industries|Mitsubishi]], [[Kawasaki Aerospace Systems Company|Kawasaki]], and [[Subaru Corporation|Fuji]], which were responsible for assembly of the inboard flaps, outboard flaps, and vertical rudder respectively.{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=391}}
 
=== Assembly plant ===
[[File:Boeing Factory 2002.jpg|thumb|747 final assembly at the [[Boeing Everett Factory]] |alt=Airplane assembly hall, featuring heavy machinery. Large cylindrical airplane sections and wings are readied for mating with other major components. Above are the cranes which ferry heavy and outsize parts of the 747.]]
[[File:Boeing Factory 2002.jpg|thumb|747 final assembly at the [[Boeing Everett Factory]] |alt=Airplane assembly hall, featuring heavy machinery. Large cylindrical airplane sections and wings are readied for mating with other major components. Above are the cranes which ferry heavy and outsize parts of the 747.]]


As Boeing did not have a plant large enough to assemble the giant airliner, they chose to build a new plant. The company considered locations in about 50 cities,<ref>Pascall, Glenn R. [http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2003/09/29/editorial3.html "Everett and Renton react differently to Boeing"]. ''Puget Sound Business Journal'', September 26, 2003. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> and eventually decided to build the new plant some {{convert|30|mi|km|sigfig=1}} north of [[Seattle]] on a site adjoining a military base at [[Paine Field]] near [[Everett, Washington|Everett]], Washington.<ref name="boe_facilit">{{Cite web |title= Major Production Facilities – Everett, Washington |url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/facilities/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071115211523/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/facilities/ |archive-date=November 15, 2007 |access-date=April 28, 2007 |publisher= The Boeing Company}}</ref> It bought the {{convert|780|acre|ha|adj=on}} site in June 1966.<ref name= B747_milest />
Boeing did not have a plant large enough to assemble the giant airliner, so they chose to build a new plant. The company considered locations in about 50 cities,<ref>Pascall, Glenn R. [http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2003/09/29/editorial3.html "Everett and Renton react differently to Boeing"]. ''Puget Sound Business Journal'', September 26, 2003. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> and eventually decided to build the new plant some {{convert|30|mi|km|sigfig=1}} north of [[Seattle]] on a site adjoining a military base at [[Paine Field]] near [[Everett, Washington|Everett]], Washington.<ref name="boe_facilit">{{Cite web |title= Major Production Facilities – Everett, Washington |url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/facilities/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071115211523/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/facilities/ |archive-date=November 15, 2007 |access-date=April 28, 2007 |publisher= The Boeing Company}}</ref> It bought the {{convert|780|acre|ha|adj=on}} site in June 1966.<ref name= B747_milest />


Developing the 747 had been a major challenge, and building its assembly plant was also a huge undertaking. Boeing president [[William M. Allen]] asked Malcolm T. Stamper, then head of the company's turbine division, to oversee construction of the [[Boeing Everett Factory|Everett factory]] and to start production of the 747.<ref>Boyer, Tom. [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2002339060_stamperobit17.html "Boeing legend Malcolm Stamper dies"]. ''Seattle Times'', June 17, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> To level the site, more than {{convert|4|e6cuyd|e6m3|sigfig=1|sp=us|spell=on|abbr=off}} of earth had to be moved.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=310}} Time was so short that the 747's full-scale [[mock-up]] was built before the factory roof above it was finished.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=365}} The plant is the [[List of largest buildings#Largest usable volume|largest building by volume]] ever built, and has been substantially expanded several times to permit construction of other models of Boeing wide-body commercial jets.<ref name= boe_facilit />
Developing the 747 had been a major challenge, and building its assembly plant was also a huge undertaking. Boeing president [[William M. Allen]] asked Malcolm T. Stamper, then head of the company's turbine division, to oversee construction of the [[Boeing Everett Factory|Everett factory]] and to start production of the 747.<ref>Boyer, Tom. [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2002339060_stamperobit17.html "Boeing legend Malcolm Stamper dies"]. ''Seattle Times'', June 17, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> To level the site, more than {{convert|4|e6cuyd|e6m3|sigfig=1|sp=us|spell=on|abbr=off}} of earth had to be moved.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=310}} Time was so short that the 747's full-scale [[mock-up]] was built before the factory roof above it was finished.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=365}} The plant is the [[List of largest buildings#Largest usable volume|largest building by volume]] ever built, and has been expanded several times to permit construction of other models of Boeing wide-body commercial jets.<ref name= boe_facilit />


=== Flight testing ===
=== Flight testing ===
Line 93: Line 97:
Before the first 747 was fully assembled, testing began on many components and systems. One important test involved the evacuation of 560 volunteers from a cabin mock-up via the aircraft's emergency chutes. The first full-scale evacuation took two and a half minutes instead of the maximum of 90 seconds mandated by the [[Federal Aviation Administration]] (FAA), and several volunteers were injured. Subsequent test evacuations achieved the 90-second goal but caused more injuries. Most problematic was evacuation from the aircraft's upper deck; instead of using a conventional slide, volunteer passengers escaped by using a harness attached to a reel.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=383}} Tests also involved taxiing such a large aircraft. Boeing built an unusual training device known as "Waddell's Wagon" (named for a 747 test pilot, Jack Waddell) that consisted of a mock-up cockpit mounted on the roof of a truck. While the first 747s were still being built, the device allowed pilots to practice taxi maneuvers from a high upper-deck position.<ref name="hist747">{{Cite web |title=History – 747 Commercial Transport |url=http://www.boeing.com/history/boeing/747.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100316193220/http://www.boeing.com/history/boeing/747.html |archive-date=March 16, 2010 |access-date=April 29, 2006 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref>
Before the first 747 was fully assembled, testing began on many components and systems. One important test involved the evacuation of 560 volunteers from a cabin mock-up via the aircraft's emergency chutes. The first full-scale evacuation took two and a half minutes instead of the maximum of 90 seconds mandated by the [[Federal Aviation Administration]] (FAA), and several volunteers were injured. Subsequent test evacuations achieved the 90-second goal but caused more injuries. Most problematic was evacuation from the aircraft's upper deck; instead of using a conventional slide, volunteer passengers escaped by using a harness attached to a reel.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=383}} Tests also involved taxiing such a large aircraft. Boeing built an unusual training device known as "Waddell's Wagon" (named for a 747 test pilot, Jack Waddell) that consisted of a mock-up cockpit mounted on the roof of a truck. While the first 747s were still being built, the device allowed pilots to practice taxi maneuvers from a high upper-deck position.<ref name="hist747">{{Cite web |title=History – 747 Commercial Transport |url=http://www.boeing.com/history/boeing/747.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100316193220/http://www.boeing.com/history/boeing/747.html |archive-date=March 16, 2010 |access-date=April 29, 2006 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref>


In 1968, the program cost was US$1&nbsp;billion<ref>{{Cite news |date=June 24, 1989 |title=Building a legend |work=[[Flight International]] |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1989/1989%20-%202006.html}}</ref> (equivalent to ${{Inflation|US-GDP|1|1968|fmt=c|r=1}} billion in {{Inflation-year|US-GDP}} dollars). On September 30, 1968, the [[N7470|first 747]] was rolled out of the Everett assembly building before the world's press and representatives of the 26 airlines that had ordered the airliner.<ref name="roll_out">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071001003121/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,838835,00.html "All but off the Ground"]. ''Time'', October 4, 1968. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Over the following months, preparations were made for the first flight, which took place on February 9, 1969, with test pilots Jack Waddell and [[Brien Wygle]] at the controls<ref name="first_flight">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071117074706/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,839015,00.html "The Giant Takes Off"]. ''Time''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref><ref name="Boeing_first_flight_commemoration">{{Cite web |date=February 9, 2004 |title=Boeing 747, the Queen of the Skies" and "Celebrates 35th Anniversary |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2004/q1/nr_040209g.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041207091236/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2004/q1/nr_040209g.html |archive-date=December 7, 2004 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> and Jess Wallick at the flight engineer's station. Despite a minor problem with one of the flaps, the flight confirmed that the 747 handled extremely well. The 747 was found to be largely immune to "[[Dutch roll]]", a phenomenon that had been a major hazard to the early swept-wing jets.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=417-418}}
In 1968, the program cost was US$1&nbsp;billion<ref>{{Cite news |date=June 24, 1989 |title=Building a legend |work=[[Flight International]] |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1989/1989%20-%202006.html}}</ref> (equivalent to ${{Inflation|US-GDP|1|1968|fmt=c|r=1}} billion in {{Inflation-year|US-GDP}} dollars). On September 30, 1968, the [[N7470|first 747]] was rolled out of the Everett assembly building for the world's press and representatives of the 26 airlines that had ordered the airliner.<ref name="roll_out">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071001003121/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,838835,00.html "All but off the Ground"]. ''Time'', October 4, 1968. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Over the following months, preparations were made for the first flight, which took place on February 9, 1969, with test pilots Jack Waddell and [[Brien Wygle]] at the controls<ref name="first_flight">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071117074706/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,839015,00.html "The Giant Takes Off"]. ''Time''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref><ref name="Boeing_first_flight_commemoration">{{Cite web |date=February 9, 2004 |title=Boeing 747, the Queen of the Skies" and "Celebrates 35th Anniversary |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2004/q1/nr_040209g.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041207091236/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2004/q1/nr_040209g.html |archive-date=December 7, 2004 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> and Jess Wallick at the flight engineer's station. Despite a minor problem with one of the flaps, the flight confirmed that the 747 handled extremely well. The 747 was found to be largely immune to "[[Dutch roll]]", a phenomenon that had been a major hazard to the early swept-wing jets.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=417-418}}


=== Issues, delays and certification ===
After the 747's introduction into commercial service in 1970, Boeing continued flight tests to address issues with the 747's design. In its first year of service, it was observed generating a significant amount of [[wake turbulence]] and posed a risk for smaller aircraft flying behind it, prompting the FAA to implement separation rules for aircraft flying close to 747s; the French government banned Pan Am from flying 747s into Paris during its first year of 747 service due to this concern.{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=314}} Boeing addressed these concerns in 1970 by conducting wake turbulence tests with a [[Boeing 737#737-100|737-100]] flying closely behind a 747 at various distances to measure the wake generation of the larger aircraft, which Boeing found only to have a slight difference from the wake generated by the smaller 707 flown in the same test.{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=314}}<ref>{{Cite book |title=Vortex Wake Turbulence: Flight Tests Conducted During 1970|pages=17-18|url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990039151/downloads/19990039151.pdf|publisher=NASA |date=1 February 1971}}</ref>
 
=== Delays and certification ===
[[File:Boeing 747 main landing gear.jpg|thumb|The 747's 16-wheel main [[landing gear]]|alt= A view of the 747's four main landing gear, each with four wheels]]
[[File:Boeing 747 main landing gear.jpg|thumb|The 747's 16-wheel main [[landing gear]]|alt= A view of the 747's four main landing gear, each with four wheels]]


During later stages of the flight test program, [[Wing flutter|flutter]] testing showed that the wings suffered oscillation under certain conditions. This difficulty was partly solved by reducing the stiffness of some wing components. However, a particularly severe high-speed flutter problem was solved only by inserting [[depleted uranium]] counterweights as ballast in the outboard engine [[nacelle]]s of the early 747s.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=428}} This measure caused some concern when these aircraft crashed, for example [[El Al Flight 1862]] at Amsterdam in 1992 with {{convert|282|kg|lb|order=flip}} of uranium in the [[tailplane]] (horizontal stabilizer); detailed investigations showed, however, that the best estimate of the exposure to depleted uranium was ".. several orders of magnitude less than the workers' limit for chronic exposure."<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Uijt de Haag |first1=P. A. M. |last2=Smetsers |first2=R. C. G. M. |last3=Witlox |first3=H. W. M. |last4=Krüs |first4=H. W. |last5=Eisenga |first5=A. H. M. |date=2000 |title=Evaluating the risk from depleted uranium after the Boeing 747-258F crash in Amsterdam, 1992 |url=http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/risico_uranium_bijlmerramp.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/risico_uranium_bijlmerramp.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |journal=Journal of Hazardous Materials |volume=76 |issue=1 |pages=39–58 |doi=10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00183-7 |pmid=10863013|bibcode=2000JHzM...76...39U | issn=0304-3894}}</ref><ref>van der Keur, Henk. [http://www.ratical.org/radiation/dhap/dhap997.html "Uranium Pollution from the Amsterdam 1992 Plane Crash"]. ''Laka Foundation'', May 1999. Retrieved: May 16, 2007.</ref>
During later stages of the flight test program, [[Wing flutter|flutter]] testing showed that the wings suffered oscillation under certain conditions. This difficulty was partly solved by reducing the stiffness of some wing components. However, a particularly severe high-speed flutter problem was solved only by inserting [[depleted uranium]] counterweights as ballast in the outboard engine [[nacelle]]s of the early 747s.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=428}} This measure caused some concern when these aircraft crashed, for example [[El Al Flight 1862]] at Amsterdam in 1992 with {{convert|282|kg|lb|order=flip}} of uranium in the [[tailplane]] (horizontal stabilizer); detailed investigations showed, however, that the best estimate of the exposure to depleted uranium was ".. several orders of magnitude less than the workers' limit for chronic exposure."<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Uijt de Haag |first1=P. A. M. |last2=Smetsers |first2=R. C. G. M. |last3=Witlox |first3=H. W. M. |last4=Krüs |first4=H. W. |last5=Eisenga |first5=A. H. M. |date=2000 |title=Evaluating the risk from depleted uranium after the Boeing 747-258F crash in Amsterdam, 1992 |url=http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/risico_uranium_bijlmerramp.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/risico_uranium_bijlmerramp.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |journal=Journal of Hazardous Materials |volume=76 |issue=1 |pages=39–58 |doi=10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00183-7 |pmid=10863013|bibcode=2000JHzM...76...39U | issn=0304-3894}}</ref><ref>van der Keur, Henk. [http://www.ratical.org/radiation/dhap/dhap997.html "Uranium Pollution from the Amsterdam 1992 Plane Crash"]. ''Laka Foundation'', May 1999. Retrieved: May 16, 2007.</ref>


The [[flight test]] program was hampered by problems with the 747's JT9D engines. Difficulties included engine stalls caused by rapid throttle movements and distortion of the turbine casings after a short period of service.{{sfn|Irving|1994|pages=441-446}} The problems delayed 747 deliveries for several months; up to 20 aircraft at the Everett plant were stranded while awaiting engine installation.<ref name="engine_trouble">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071117074710/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,844949,00.html "The Trouble with Jumbo"]. ''Time'', September 26, 1969.</ref> The program was further delayed when one of the five test aircraft suffered serious damage during a landing attempt at [[Renton Municipal Airport]], the site of Boeing's [[Boeing Renton Factory|Renton factory]]. The incident happened on December 13, 1969, when a test aircraft was flown to Renton to have test equipment removed and a cabin installed. Pilot Ralph C. Cokely undershot the airport's short runway and the 747's right, outer landing gear was torn off and two engine [[nacelle]]s were damaged.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=436}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 26, 1970 |title=Aircraft Incident Report 5-0046 |url=https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7019.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7019.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |access-date=August 19, 2022 |website=National Transportation Safety Board}}</ref> However, these difficulties did not prevent Boeing from taking a test aircraft to the 28th [[Paris Air Show]] in mid-1969, where it was displayed to the public for the first time.<ref>[https://www.reuters.com/article/airshow-idUSL148638820070614 "The Paris Air Show in facts and figures."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151031030356/http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/06/14/airshow-idUSL148638820070614 |date=October 31, 2015}} ''Reuters'', June 14, 2007. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.</ref> Finally, in December 1969, the 747 received its FAA [[airworthiness certificate]], clearing it for introduction into service.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20090331202213/http://www.janes.com/transport/news/jawa/jawa001031_n_1.shtml "Boeing 747-400"]. ''Jane's All the World's Aircraft'', October 31, 2000. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.</ref>
The [[flight test]] program was hampered by problems with the 747's JT9D engines. Difficulties included engine stalls caused by rapid throttle movements and distortion of the turbine casings after a short period of service.{{sfn|Irving|1994|pages=441-446}} The problems delayed 747 deliveries for several months; up to 20 aircraft at the Everett plant were stranded while awaiting engine installation.<ref name="engine_trouble">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071117074710/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,844949,00.html "The Trouble with Jumbo"]. ''Time'', September 26, 1969.</ref> The program was further delayed when one of the five test aircraft suffered serious damage during a landing attempt at [[Renton Municipal Airport]], the site of Boeing's [[Boeing Renton Factory|Renton factory]]. The incident happened on December 13, 1969, when a test aircraft was flown to Renton to have test equipment removed and a cabin installed. Pilot Ralph C. Cokely undershot the airport's short runway and the 747's right, outer landing gear was torn off and two engine [[nacelle]]s were damaged.{{sfn|Irving|1994|page=436}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 26, 1970 |title=Aircraft Incident Report 5-0046 |url=https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7019.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7019.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |access-date=August 19, 2022 |website=National Transportation Safety Board}}</ref> However, these difficulties did not prevent Boeing from taking a test aircraft to the 28th [[Paris Air Show]] in mid-1969, where it was displayed to the public for the first time.<ref>[https://www.reuters.com/article/airshow-idUSL148638820070614 "The Paris Air Show in facts and figures."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151031030356/http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/06/14/airshow-idUSL148638820070614 |date=October 31, 2015}} ''Reuters'', June 14, 2007. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.</ref> Finally, in December 1969, the 747 received its FAA [[airworthiness certificate]], clearing it for introduction into service.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20090331202213/http://www.janes.com/transport/news/jawa/jawa001031_n_1.shtml "Boeing 747-400"]. ''Jane's All the World's Aircraft'', October 31, 2000. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.</ref> Pan Am introduced the first 747 service the following year on January 22, 1970.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=48}}
 
The huge cost of developing the 747 and building the Everett factory meant that Boeing had to borrow heavily from a banking syndicate. During the final months before delivery of the first aircraft, the company had to repeatedly request additional funding to complete the project. Had this been refused, Boeing's survival would have been threatened.<ref name=infoplease />{{sfn|Irving|1994|pages=437-438}} The firm's debt exceeded $2 billion, with the $1.2 billion owed to the banks setting a record for all companies. Allen later said, "It was really too large a project for us."<ref name="heppenheimer1998">{{Cite book |last=Heppenheimer, T. A. |url=https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4221/contents.htm |title=The Space Shuttle Decision |publisher=NASA |year=1998 |pages=302=303}}</ref> Ultimately, the gamble succeeded, and Boeing held a monopoly in very large passenger aircraft production for many years.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20130621192058/http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/jumbo-challenge-3750/ "Jumbo challenge"] Flightglobal.com, November 6, 1997. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.</ref>
 
=== Entry into service ===
[[File:Pat Nixon christens Boeing 747 2749-18.jpg|thumb|First Lady [[Pat Nixon]] christened the first commercial 747 on January 15, 1970.]]


On January 15, 1970, [[First Lady of the United States|First Lady]] [[Pat Nixon]] christened Pan Am's first 747 at [[Washington Dulles International Airport|Dulles International Airport]]<!--(later Washington Dulles International Airport)--> in the presence of Pan Am chairman [[Najeeb Halaby]].<ref name=pwcgj>{{cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=K6hVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9OADAAAAIBAJ&pg=6406%2C3076731 |work=Eugene Register-Guard |location=(Oregon) |agency=Associated Press |title=President's wife christens giant jet |date=January 15, 1970 |page=5A}}</ref> Instead of champagne, red, white, and blue water was sprayed on the aircraft. The 747 entered service on January 22, 1970, on Pan Am's New York–London route;{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=48}} the flight had been planned for the evening of January 21, but engine overheating made the original aircraft (Clipper Young America, registration N735PA) unusable. Finding a substitute delayed the flight by more than six hours to the following day when [[Clipper Victor]] (registration N736PA) was used.<ref name="Time_Jumbo-Gremlins">[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127015913/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878184,00.html "Jumbo and the Gremlins"]. ''Time'', February 2, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title= About the 747 Family |url= http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121002063408/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |archive-date=October 2, 2012 |publisher=Boeing Commercial Airplanes}}</ref> The 747 enjoyed a fairly smooth introduction into service, overcoming concerns that some airports would not be able to accommodate an aircraft that large.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127061820/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,899789,00.html "Breaking the Ground Barrier"]. ''Time'', September 8, 1967. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.</ref> Although technical problems occurred, they were relatively minor and quickly solved.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127122755/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,909472,00.html "Jumbo Beats the Gremlins"]. ''Time'', July 13, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.</ref>
The huge cost of developing the 747 and building the Everett factory meant that Boeing had to borrow heavily from a banking syndicate. During the final months before delivery of the first aircraft, the company had to repeatedly request additional funding to complete the project. Had this been refused, Boeing's survival would have been threatened.<ref name=infoplease />{{sfn|Irving|1994|pages=437-438}} The firm's debt exceeded $2 billion, with $1.2 billion owed to the banks setting a record for all companies. Allen later said, "It was really too large a project for us."<ref name="heppenheimer1998">{{Cite book |last=Heppenheimer, T. A. |url=https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4221/contents.htm |title=The Space Shuttle Decision |publisher=NASA |year=1998 |pages=302=303}}</ref> Ultimately, the gamble succeeded, and Boeing held a monopoly in very large passenger aircraft production for many years.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/jumbo-challenge-3750/ |title=Jumbo challenge |work=Flightglobal |date=November 6, 1997 |access-date=July 15, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130621192058/http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/jumbo-challenge-3750/ |archive-date=2013-06-21}}</ref>


=== Improved 747 versions ===
=== Improved versions ===
{{Multiple images
{{Multiple images
| align            = right
| align            = right
Line 123: Line 124:
After the initial {{not a typo|747-100}}, Boeing developed the {{nowrap|-100B}}, a higher [[maximum takeoff weight]] (MTOW) variant, and the {{nowrap|-100SR}} (Short Range), with higher passenger capacity.<ref name="Boe_747_classics">[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classic_back.html "Boeing 747 Classics"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.</ref> Increased maximum takeoff weight allows aircraft to carry more fuel and have longer range.<ref>[http://active.boeing.com/commercial/cas/index.cfm?content=include/solutions.cfm&pageid=m34945 "Solutions Center."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151015205312/http://active.boeing.com/commercial/cas/index.cfm?content=include%2Fsolutions.cfm&pageid=m34945 |date=October 15, 2015 }} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> The {{nowrap|-200}} model followed in 1971, featuring more powerful engines and a higher MTOW. Passenger, freighter and combination passenger-freighter versions of the {{nowrap|-200}} were produced.<ref name=Boe_747_classics /> The shortened [[Boeing 747SP|747SP]] (special performance) with a longer range was also developed, and entered service in 1976.<ref>[http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=98 "Boeing 747SP."] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061030225056/http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=98 |date=October 30, 2006}} ''Airliners.net''. Retrieved: November 23, 2007.</ref>
After the initial {{not a typo|747-100}}, Boeing developed the {{nowrap|-100B}}, a higher [[maximum takeoff weight]] (MTOW) variant, and the {{nowrap|-100SR}} (Short Range), with higher passenger capacity.<ref name="Boe_747_classics">[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classic_back.html "Boeing 747 Classics"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.</ref> Increased maximum takeoff weight allows aircraft to carry more fuel and have longer range.<ref>[http://active.boeing.com/commercial/cas/index.cfm?content=include/solutions.cfm&pageid=m34945 "Solutions Center."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151015205312/http://active.boeing.com/commercial/cas/index.cfm?content=include%2Fsolutions.cfm&pageid=m34945 |date=October 15, 2015 }} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> The {{nowrap|-200}} model followed in 1971, featuring more powerful engines and a higher MTOW. Passenger, freighter and combination passenger-freighter versions of the {{nowrap|-200}} were produced.<ref name=Boe_747_classics /> The shortened [[Boeing 747SP|747SP]] (special performance) with a longer range was also developed, and entered service in 1976.<ref>[http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=98 "Boeing 747SP."] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061030225056/http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=98 |date=October 30, 2006}} ''Airliners.net''. Retrieved: November 23, 2007.</ref>


The 747 line was further developed with the launch of the {{not a typo|747-300}} on June 11, 1980, followed by interest from Swissair a month later and the go-ahead for the project.<ref name=":2" />{{Rp|86}} The 300 series resulted from Boeing studies to increase the [[seating capacity]] of the 747, during which modifications such as fuselage plugs and extending the upper deck over the entire length of the fuselage were rejected. The first {{not a typo|747-300}}, completed in 1983, included a stretched upper deck, increased cruise speed, and increased seating capacity. The -300 variant was previously designated 747SUD for stretched upper deck, then 747-200 SUD,<ref name= "owner_guide">[http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf "Aircraft Owner's and Operator's Guide: 747-200/300"](PDF). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111009004335if_/http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf |date=October 9, 2011 }}''Aircraft Commerce''. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.</ref> followed by 747EUD, before the 747-300 designation was used.<ref name="airl_300">[http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=99 "Boeing 747-300"]. ''Airliners.net''. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.</ref> Passenger, short range and combination freighter-passenger versions of the 300 series were produced.<ref name= Boe_747_classics />
Boeing primarily focused on improving payload capabilities during the development and testing of the 747-200 and its subvariants in the 1970s. Weight trials were conducted between October and November of 1970 at [[Edwards Air Force Base]] with the prototype 747-200B, which reached a maximum takeoff weight of {{Convert|820700|lb|t}} during a test flight on November 12. At that time, the aircraft held the record for the heaviest takeoff weight until heavier and more powerful 747-200 airframes were built.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=54}} On November 1, 1976, the first [[Rolls-Royce RB211|RB211]]-powered 747-200 set a world record for maximum mass lifted during a trial flight at [[Naval Air Station Lemoore|NAS Lemoore]], where it flew up to 6,562 feet (2,000 meters) with a weight of {{Convert|840500|lb|t}}.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=56}}
 
The 747 line was further developed with the launch of the {{not a typo|747-300}} on June 11, 1980, followed by interest from [[Swissair]] a month later and the go-ahead for the project.<ref name=":2" />{{Rp|86}} The 300 series resulted from Boeing studies to increase the [[seating capacity]] of the 747, during which modifications such as fuselage plugs and extending the upper deck over the entire length of the fuselage were rejected. The first {{not a typo|747-300}}, completed in 1983, included a stretched upper deck, increased cruise speed, and increased seating capacity. The -300 variant was previously designated 747SUD for stretched upper deck, then 747-200 SUD,<ref name= "owner_guide">[http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf "Aircraft Owner's and Operator's Guide: 747-200/300"](PDF). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111009004335/http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf |date=October 9, 2011 }}''Aircraft Commerce''. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.</ref> followed by 747EUD, before the 747-300 designation was used.<ref name="airl_300">[http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=99 "Boeing 747-300"]. ''Airliners.net''. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.</ref> Passenger, short range and combination freighter-passenger versions of the 300 series were produced.<ref name= Boe_747_classics />
 
Throughout the early 1980s, Boeing faced criticism from customers who expressed frustration over Boeing's incremental approach to the 747's development, pointing out that previous 747 variants were developed merely as derivatives of the original 747-100 from the late 1960s, with improvements focused on one area of the design (i.e. payload for the 747-200, range for the 747SP and later 747-200 models, passenger capacity for the 747-300), rather than as complete revamps of the original design that incorporated newer technologies of the decade to update systems and performance; in an effort to save on Boeing's total development costs across all aircraft types, the finance department disallowed the design team from proposing major changes to the 747.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=258}} The demand for a modernized 747 with newer technologies intensified after the publication of an interview with [[Lufthansa]]'s then-deputy chairman, {{ill|Reinhardt Abraham|de}}, on the May 28, 1984, issue of ''[[Aviation Week & Space Technology]]'', which stated:
 
{{blockquote|Boeing is working on all of the proposed improvements but Lufthansa is concerned that they will make them available in a piecemeal fashion. Abraham said this would increase the development cost, which will be passed along to the airlines, and result in airlines operating a fleet of 747 aircraft that have little remaining commonality. "We don't like the piecemeal approach," Abraham said. "We want one full package on the airplane. It would be a big incentive for new orders."{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=258-259}}}}


In 1985, development of the longer range [[Boeing 747-400|747-400]] began.<ref>Lawrence and Thornton 2005, p. 54.</ref> The variant had a new [[glass cockpit]], which allowed for a cockpit crew of two instead of three,<ref>Salpukas, Agis. [https://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/01/business/jal-orders-15-more-of-boeing-s-747-400-s.html "J.A.L. Orders 15 More of Boeing's 747-400s"]. ''Time'', July 1, 1988. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> new engines, lighter construction materials, and a redesigned interior. Development costs soared, and production delays occurred as new technologies were incorporated at the request of airlines. Insufficient workforce experience and reliance on overtime contributed to early production problems on the {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref name=ucfc747 /> The -400 entered service in 1989.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=88}}
After the publication of Abraham's ''Aviation Week & Space Technology'' interview, more airlines became vocal about expressing their demands for a modernized 747, to which Boeing responded by launching the development of the longer-range [[Boeing 747-400|747-400]] in October 1985.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=258-259}}<ref>Lawrence and Thornton 2005, p. 54.</ref> This variant had a new [[glass cockpit]], which allowed for a cockpit crew of two instead of three,<ref>Salpukas, Agis. [https://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/01/business/jal-orders-15-more-of-boeing-s-747-400-s.html "J.A.L. Orders 15 More of Boeing's 747-400s"]. ''Time'', July 1, 1988. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> new engines, lighter construction materials, and a redesigned interior.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=88}} Development costs soared, and production delays occurred as new technologies were incorporated at the request of airlines. Insufficient workforce experience and reliance on overtime contributed to early production problems on the {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref name=ucfc747 /> The -400 entered service in 1989.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=88}}


In 1991, a record-breaking 1,087 passengers were flown in a 747 during a [[Operation Solomon|covert operation to airlift Ethiopian Jews to Israel]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 24, 2021 |title=El Al Israel Airlines' History. The 1990s. |url=https://www.elal.com/en/About-ELAL/About-ELAL/History/Pages/Decade-90.aspx |access-date=July 24, 2021 |publisher=El Al Israel Airlines |language=en}}</ref> Generally, the 747-400 held between 416 and 524 passengers.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Angelucci |first=Angelucci |title=World Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft |date=2001 |publisher=Chartwell Books |isbn=0-7858-1389-6 |location=Spain |page=403}}</ref> The 747 remained the heaviest commercial aircraft in regular service until the debut of the [[Antonov An-124]] Ruslan in 1982; variants of the 747-400 surpassed the An-124's weight in 2000. The [[Antonov An-225 Mriya|Antonov An-225 ''Mriya'']] [[cargo aircraft|cargo transport]], which debuted in 1988, remains the world's largest aircraft by several measures (including the most accepted measures of maximum takeoff weight and length); one aircraft has been completed and was in service until 2022. The [[Scaled Composites Stratolaunch]] is currently the largest aircraft by [[wingspan]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Malik |first=Tariq |date=April 13, 2019 |title=Stratolaunch Flies World's Largest Plane for the First Time |url=https://www.space.com/stratolaunch-flies-worlds-largest-plane-first-time.html |access-date=April 17, 2025 |website=Space.com |language=en}}</ref>
The 747 remained the heaviest commercial aircraft in regular service until the debut of the [[Antonov An-124]] Ruslan in 1982; variants of the 747-400 surpassed the An-124's weight in 2000. The [[Antonov An-225 Mriya|Antonov An-225 ''Mriya'']] [[cargo aircraft|cargo transport]], which debuted in 1988, remains the world's largest aircraft by several measures (including the most accepted measures of maximum takeoff weight and length); one aircraft has been completed and was in service until 2022 when it was [[Battle of Antonov Airport|destroyed]]. The [[Scaled Composites Stratolaunch]] is currently the largest aircraft by [[wingspan]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Malik |first=Tariq |date=April 13, 2019 |title=Stratolaunch Flies World's Largest Plane for the First Time |url=https://www.space.com/stratolaunch-flies-worlds-largest-plane-first-time.html |access-date=April 17, 2025 |website=Space.com |language=en}}</ref>


=== Further developments ===
=== Further development ===
[[File:Japan Airlines 747-400 Economy cabin.jpg|thumb|747-400 main deck economy class seating in 3–4–3 layout|alt=Interior view. Seats are separated by two aisles, in 3–4–3 configuration. A TV is positioned towards the front of aircraft.]]
[[File:Japan Airlines 747-400 Economy cabin.jpg|thumb|747-400 main deck economy class seating in 3–4–3 layout|alt=Interior view. Seats are separated by two aisles, in 3–4–3 configuration. A TV is positioned towards the front of aircraft.]]


After the arrival of the {{not a typo|747-400}}, several stretching schemes for the 747 were proposed. Boeing announced the larger 747-500X and {{nowrap|-600X}} preliminary designs in 1996.<ref name="boe_1996">{{Cite web |date=September 2, 1996 |title=Boeing Outlines the "Value" of Its 747 Plans |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1996/news.release.960902c.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20081024211719/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1996/news.release.960902c.html |archive-date=October 24, 2008 |access-date=June 7, 2011 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> The new variants would have cost more than US$5&nbsp;billion to develop,<ref name=boe_1996 /> and interest was not sufficient to launch the program.<ref name="FI_500X">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071214001602/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/1997/03/19/157/ba-warms-to-a3xx-plan.html "BA warms to A3XX plan"]. ''Flight International'', March 19, 1997. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> In 2000, Boeing offered the more modest 747X and 747X stretch derivatives as alternatives to the Airbus [[Airbus A380|A38X]]. However, the 747X family was unable to attract enough interest to enter production. A year later, Boeing switched from the 747X studies to pursue the [[Boeing Sonic Cruiser|Sonic Cruiser]],<ref name= "shelv_747X">[http://english.people.com.cn/english/200103/30/eng20010330_66406.html "Boeing Shelves 747X to Focus on Faster Jet"]. ''[[People's Daily]]'', March 30, 2001. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> and after the Sonic Cruiser program was put on hold, the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787 Dreamliner]].<ref>Taylor, Alex III. [https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2002/12/09/333457/ "Boeing's Amazing Sonic Cruiser…"] ''[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]'', December 9, 2002. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Some of the ideas developed for the 747X were used on the [[Boeing 747-400ER|747-400ER]], a longer range variant of the {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref>{{Cite web |date= November 28, 2000 |title=Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400 |url= http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |url-status=dead |archive-url = http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090706141448/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |archive-date=July 6, 2009 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref>
After the arrival of the {{not a typo|747-400}}, several stretching schemes for the 747 were proposed. Boeing announced the larger 747-500X and {{nowrap|-600X}} preliminary designs in 1996.<ref name="boe_1996">{{Cite web |date=September 2, 1996 |title=Boeing Outlines the "Value" of Its 747 Plans |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1996/news.release.960902c.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081024211719/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1996/news.release.960902c.html |archive-date=October 24, 2008 |access-date=June 7, 2011 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> The new variants would have cost more than US$5&nbsp;billion,<ref name=boe_1996 /> and interest was not sufficient to continue.<ref name="FI_500X">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071214001602/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/1997/03/19/157/ba-warms-to-a3xx-plan.html "BA warms to A3XX plan"]. ''Flight International'', March 19, 1997. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> In 2000, Boeing offered the more modest 747X and 747X stretch derivatives as alternatives to the Airbus [[Airbus A380|A38X]]. However, the 747X family was unable to attract enough interest to enter production. A year later, Boeing switched from the 747X studies to pursue the [[Boeing Sonic Cruiser|Sonic Cruiser]],<ref name= "shelv_747X">[http://english.people.com.cn/english/200103/30/eng20010330_66406.html "Boeing Shelves 747X to Focus on Faster Jet"]. ''[[People's Daily]]'', March 30, 2001. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> and after the Sonic Cruiser program was put on hold, the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787 Dreamliner]].<ref>Taylor, Alex III. [https://web.archive.org/web/20200424093148/https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2002/12/09/333457/ "Boeing's Amazing Sonic Cruiser…"] ''[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]'', December 9, 2002. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Some of the ideas developed for the 747X were used on the [[Boeing 747-400ER|747-400ER]], a longer range variant of the {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref>{{Cite web |date= November 28, 2000 |title=Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400 |url= http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |url-status=dead |archive-url = http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090706141448/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |archive-date=July 6, 2009 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref>


After several variants were proposed but later abandoned, some industry observers became skeptical of new aircraft proposals from Boeing.<ref>Holmes, Stanley. [http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/nov2005/id20051116_370967.htm "Boeing's Reborn 747."] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071208081112/http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/nov2005/id20051116_370967.htm |date=December 8, 2007}} ''Business Week'', November 16, 2005.</ref> However, in early 2004, Boeing announced tentative plans for the 747 Advanced that were eventually adopted. Similar in nature to the 747-X, the stretched 747 Advanced used technology from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems. The 747 remained the largest passenger airliner in service until the [[Airbus A380]] began airline service in 2007.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7061164.stm "A380 superjumbo lands in Sydney"]. ''BBC News''. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.</ref>
After several variants were proposed but abandoned, some industry observers became skeptical of new aircraft proposals from Boeing.<ref>Holmes, Stanley. [http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/nov2005/id20051116_370967.htm "Boeing's Reborn 747."] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071208081112/http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/nov2005/id20051116_370967.htm |date=December 8, 2007}} ''Business Week'', November 16, 2005.</ref> However, in early 2004, Boeing announced plans for the 747 Advanced that were eventually adopted. Similar in nature to the 747-X, the stretched 747 Advanced used technology from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems. The 747 remained the largest passenger airliner in service until the [[Airbus A380]] began airline service in 2007.<ref>[https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7061164.stm "A380 superjumbo lands in Sydney"]. ''BBC News''. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.</ref>


[[File:Boeing 747-8 Lufthansa D-ABYI at LAX.jpg|alt=A Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental for Lufthansa|thumb|A Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental of [[Lufthansa]]]]
[[File:Boeing 747-8 Lufthansa D-ABYI at LAX.jpg|alt=A Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental for Lufthansa|thumb|A Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental of [[Lufthansa]]]]
On November 14, 2005, Boeing announced it was launching the 747 Advanced as the [[Boeing 747-8]].<ref name="boeing747-8">{{Cite web |date=November 14, 2005 |title=Boeing Launches New 747-8 Family |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/q4/nr_051114h.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051124063705/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/q4/nr_051114h.html |archive-date=November 24, 2005 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> The last 747-400s were completed in 2009.<ref name="downhill">[http://www.businessday.co.nz/world/4842143 "Downhill for the jumbo."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090211082459/http://www.businessday.co.nz/world/4842143 |date=February 11, 2009}} ''[[The Sydney Morning Herald]]'', January 9, 2009. Retrieved: February 9, 2009.</ref> {{As of|2011}}, most orders of the 747-8 were for the freighter variant. On February 8, 2010, the 747-8 Freighter made its [[maiden flight]].<ref>Ostrower, Jon. [https://web.archive.org/web/20100212112245/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/02/08/338138/pictures.html "Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight"]. Flightglobal.com, February 8, 2010.</ref> The first delivery of the 747-8 went to [[Cargolux]] in 2011.<ref>[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1448 "Boeing Sets 747-8 Freighter Delivery Schedule for Mid-Year 2011"]. ''The Boeing Company'', September 30, 2010.</ref><ref>Trimble, Stephen. [https://web.archive.org/web/20101002103349/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/09/30/347996/boeing-pushes-747-8f-delivery-back-to-mid-2011.html "Boeing pushes 747-8F delivery back to mid-2011/"] ''Air Transport Intelligence News'' via ''Flight global,'' September 30, 2010. Retrieved: February 22, 2011.</ref> The first 747-8 Intercontinental passenger variant was delivered to [[Lufthansa]] on May 5, 2012.<ref>{{Cite press release |title= Lufthansa conducts inaugural flight of world's first Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental passenger aircraft from Frankfurt to Washington, D.C. |date=June 1, 2012 |publisher=Boeing |url=https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2012-06-01-Lufthansa-Conducts-Inaugural-Flight-of-Worlds-First-Boeing-747-8-Intercontinental-Passenger-Aircraft-from-Frankfurt-to-Washington-D-C}}</ref> The 1,500th Boeing 747 was delivered in June 2014 to Lufthansa.<ref name= "1500th_747">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2014-06-28-Boeing-Delivers-1-500th-747 "Boeing Delivers 1,500th 747"]. Boeing, June 28, 2014.</ref>
On November 14, 2005, Boeing announced it was launching the 747 Advanced as the [[Boeing 747-8]].<ref name="boeing747-8">{{Cite web |date=November 14, 2005 |title=Boeing Launches New 747-8 Family |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/q4/nr_051114h.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051124063705/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/q4/nr_051114h.html |archive-date=November 24, 2005 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> The last 747-400s were completed in 2009.<ref name="downhill">[http://www.businessday.co.nz/world/4842143 "Downhill for the jumbo."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090211082459/http://www.businessday.co.nz/world/4842143 |date=February 11, 2009}} ''[[The Sydney Morning Herald]]'', January 9, 2009. Retrieved: February 9, 2009.</ref> {{As of|2011}}, most orders of the 747-8 were for the freighter variant. On February 8, 2010, the 747-8 Freighter made its [[maiden flight]].<ref>Ostrower, Jon. [https://web.archive.org/web/20100212112245/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/02/08/338138/pictures.html "Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight"]. Flightglobal.com, February 8, 2010.</ref> The first delivery of the 747-8 went to [[Cargolux]] in 2011.<ref>[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1448 "Boeing Sets 747-8 Freighter Delivery Schedule for Mid-Year 2011"]. ''The Boeing Company'', September 30, 2010.</ref><ref>Trimble, Stephen. [https://web.archive.org/web/20101002103349/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/09/30/347996/boeing-pushes-747-8f-delivery-back-to-mid-2011.html "Boeing pushes 747-8F delivery back to mid-2011/"] ''Air Transport Intelligence News'' via ''Flight global,'' September 30, 2010. Retrieved: February 22, 2011.</ref> The first 747-8 Intercontinental passenger variant was delivered to [[Lufthansa]] on May 5, 2012.<ref>{{Cite press release |title= Lufthansa conducts inaugural flight of world's first Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental passenger aircraft from Frankfurt to Washington, D.C. |date=June 1, 2012 |publisher=Boeing |url=https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2012-06-01-Lufthansa-Conducts-Inaugural-Flight-of-Worlds-First-Boeing-747-8-Intercontinental-Passenger-Aircraft-from-Frankfurt-to-Washington-D-C}}</ref> The 1,500th Boeing 747 was delivered in June 2014 to Lufthansa.<ref name= "1500th_747">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2014-06-28-Boeing-Delivers-1-500th-747 "Boeing Delivers 1,500th 747"]. Boeing, June 28, 2014.</ref>


In January 2016, Boeing stated it was reducing 747-8 production to six per year beginning in September 2016, incurring a $569&nbsp;million post-tax charge against its fourth-quarter 2015 profits. At the end of 2015, the company had 20 orders outstanding.<ref>{{Cite news |date=January 22, 2016 |title=Jumbo jet demise draws a step closer |work=Financial Times |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/812f52e0-c083-11e5-9fdb-87b8d15baec2.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/812f52e0-c083-11e5-9fdb-87b8d15baec2.html |archive-date=December 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Ostrower |first=Jon |date=January 22, 2016 |title=Boeing to Cut Production of 747s |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-to-cut-production-of-747s-1453412741}}</ref> On January 29, 2016, Boeing announced that it had begun the preliminary work on the modifications to a commercial 747-8 for the next [[Air Force One]] presidential aircraft, then expected to be operational by 2020.<ref>{{Cite news |date=February 1, 2016 |title=Boeing starts work on replacing Air Force One |work=Air Force Times |url=http://www.airforcetimes.com/story/military/2016/02/01/boeing-starts-work-replacing-air-force-one/79637424/}}</ref>
In January 2016, Boeing stated it was reducing 747-8 production to six per year beginning in September 2016, incurring a $569&nbsp;million post-tax charge against its fourth-quarter 2015 profits. At the end of 2015, the company had 20 orders outstanding.<ref>{{Cite news |date=January 22, 2016 |title=Jumbo jet demise draws a step closer |work=Financial Times |url=https://www.ft.com/content/812f52e0-c083-11e5-9fdb-87b8d15baec2 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/812f52e0-c083-11e5-9fdb-87b8d15baec2.html |archive-date=December 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Ostrower |first=Jon |date=January 22, 2016 |title=Boeing to Cut Production of 747s |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-to-cut-production-of-747s-1453412741}}</ref> On January 29, 2016, Boeing announced that it had begun the preliminary work on the modifications to a commercial 747-8 for the next [[Air Force One]] presidential aircraft, then expected to be operational by 2020.<ref>{{Cite news |date=February 1, 2016 |title=Boeing starts work on replacing Air Force One |work=Air Force Times |url=http://www.airforcetimes.com/story/military/2016/02/01/boeing-starts-work-replacing-air-force-one/79637424/}}</ref>


On July 12, 2016, Boeing announced that it had finalized an order from [[Volga-Dnepr Group]] for 20 747-8 freighters, valued at $7.58&nbsp;billion (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US-GDP|value=7580000000|start_year=2016}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US-GDP}}) at list prices. Four aircraft were delivered beginning in 2012. Volga-Dnepr Group is the parent of three major Russian air-freight carriers – [[Volga-Dnepr Airlines]], [[AirBridgeCargo Airlines]] and [[Atran Airlines]]. The new 747-8 freighters would replace AirBridgeCargo's current 747-400 aircraft and expand the airline's fleet and will be acquired through a mix of direct purchases and leasing over the next six years, Boeing said.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 12, 2016 |title=Volga-Dnepr Group acquires 20 Boeing 747-8 freighters |url=http://atwonline.com/airframes/volga-dnepr-group-acquires-20-boeing-747-8-freighters? |publisher=Air Transport World}}</ref>
On July 12, 2016, Boeing announced that it had finalized an order from [[Volga-Dnepr Group]] for 20 747-8 freighters, valued at $7.58&nbsp;billion (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US-GDP|value=7580000000|start_year=2016}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US-GDP}}) at list prices. Four aircraft were delivered beginning in 2012. Volga-Dnepr Group is the parent of three major Russian air-freight carriers – [[Volga-Dnepr Airlines]], [[AirBridgeCargo Airlines]] and [[Atran Airlines]]. The new 747-8 freighters would replace AirBridgeCargo's current 747-400 aircraft and expand the airline's fleet and will be acquired through a mix of direct purchases and leasing over the next six years, Boeing said.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 12, 2016 |title=Volga-Dnepr Group acquires 20 Boeing 747-8 freighters |url=http://atwonline.com/airframes/volga-dnepr-group-acquires-20-boeing-747-8-freighters? |publisher=Air Transport World}}</ref>


=== End of production ===
=== End of production ===
On July 27, 2016, in its quarterly report to the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]], Boeing discussed the potential termination of 747 production due to insufficient demand and market for the aircraft.<ref>{{Cite web |last=The Boeing Company |date=July 27, 2016 |title=Form 10-Q Quarterly report |url=http://pdf.secdatabase.com/1159/0000012927-16-000143.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://pdf.secdatabase.com/1159/0000012927-16-000143.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |publisher=Securities and Exchange Commission |quote=it is reasonably possible that we could decide to end production of the 747}}</ref> With a firm order backlog of 21 aircraft and a production rate of six per year, program accounting had been reduced to 1,555 aircraft.<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 1, 2016 |title=Boeing's 747 Struggles Indicate Large-Aircraft Market Decline |url=http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/boeing-s-747-struggles-indicate-large-aircraft-market-decline |website=Aviation Week}}</ref> In October 2016, [[UPS Airlines]] ordered 14 -8Fs to add capacity, along with 14 options, which it took in February 2018 to increase the total to 28 -8Fs on order.<ref name="UPS2018Order">{{Cite web |title=Boeing: UPS Orders 14 Additional 747-8 Freighters, Plus Four 767 Freighters |url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/customers/ups/747-8-767-order.page |access-date=March 10, 2018 |website=boeing.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=February 8, 2019 |title=Fifty years on, Boeing's 747 clings to life as cargo carrier |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-747-anniversary/fifty-years-on-boeings-747-clings-to-life-as-cargo-carrier-idUSKCN1PX17L}}</ref> The backlog then stood at 25 aircraft, though several of these were orders from airlines that no longer intended to take delivery.<ref>{{Cite news |date=October 27, 2016 |title=UPS orders 14 747-8 Freighters |work=Flight Global |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/ups-orders-14-747-8-freighters-430814/}}</ref>
On July 27, 2016, in its quarterly report to the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]], Boeing discussed the termination of 747 production due to insufficient demand.<ref>{{Cite web |last=The Boeing Company |date=July 27, 2016 |title=Form 10-Q Quarterly report |url=http://pdf.secdatabase.com/1159/0000012927-16-000143.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://pdf.secdatabase.com/1159/0000012927-16-000143.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |publisher=Securities and Exchange Commission |quote=it is reasonably possible that we could decide to end production of the 747}}</ref> With a firm order backlog of 21 aircraft and a production rate of six per year, program accounting had been reduced to 1,555 aircraft.<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 1, 2016 |title=Boeing's 747 Struggles Indicate Large-Aircraft Market Decline |url=http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/boeing-s-747-struggles-indicate-large-aircraft-market-decline |website=Aviation Week}}</ref> In October 2016, [[UPS Airlines]] ordered 14 -8Fs to add capacity, with options for 14, added in February 2018 to increase the total to 28 -8Fs on order.<ref name="UPS2018Order">{{Cite web |title=Boeing: UPS Orders 14 Additional 747-8 Freighters, Plus Four 767 Freighters |url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/customers/ups/747-8-767-order.page |access-date=March 10, 2018 |website=boeing.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=February 8, 2019 |title=Fifty years on, Boeing's 747 clings to life as cargo carrier |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-747-anniversary/fifty-years-on-boeings-747-clings-to-life-as-cargo-carrier-idUSKCN1PX17L}}</ref> The backlog then stood at 25 aircraft, though several of these were orders from airlines that no longer intended to take delivery.<ref>{{Cite news |date=October 27, 2016 |title=UPS orders 14 747-8 Freighters |work=Flight Global |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/ups-orders-14-747-8-freighters-430814/}}</ref>


[[File:N863GT EHAM.jpg|thumb|right|[[Atlas Air]] 747-8F N863GT, the last Boeing 747 to be built and delivered]]
On July 2, 2020, it was reported that Boeing planned to end 747 production in 2022 upon delivery of the remaining jets for UPS and the Volga-Dnepr Group, due to low demand.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Johnsson |first=Julie |date=July 2, 2020 |title=Boeing Quietly Pulls Plug on the 747, Closing Era of Jumbo Jets |work=Bloomberg |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-02/boeing-quietly-pulls-plug-on-the-747-closing-era-of-jumbo-jets |url-access=subscription}}</ref> On July 29, 2020, Boeing confirmed that the final 747 would be delivered in 2022 as a result of "current market dynamics and outlook" stemming from the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], according to CEO David Calhoun.<ref name="endofline">{{Cite web |last=Hemmerdinger |first=Jon |date=July 29, 2020 |title=Boeing slashes output, delays 777X to 2022 and confirms end for 747 |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/airframers/boeing-slashes-output-delays-777x-to-2022-and-confirms-end-for-747/139534.article |access-date=August 3, 2020 |publisher=Flightglobal}}</ref> The last aircraft, a 747-8F for [[Atlas Air]] registered N863GT, rolled off the production line on December 6, 2022,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Josephs |first=Leslie |date=December 6, 2022 |title=Boeing's last 747 has rolled out of the factory after a more than 50-year production run |work=[[CNBC]] |url= https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/06/boeing-747-production-is-ending-with-shift-to-twin-engine-jets.html}}</ref> and was delivered on January 31, 2023.<ref name="NYT Jan2023">{{Cite news |last1= Chokshi |first1=Niraj |last2= Menghistab |first2=Meron Tekie |last3= Tamayo |first3=Jovelle |last4= Wasson |first4=Lindsey |date= January 31, 2023 |title=The Last Boeing 747 Leaves the Factory |language=en-US |work= [[The New York Times]] |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/31/business/last-boeing-747-plane.html |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Boeing hosted an event at the Everett factory for thousands of workers as well as industry executives to commemorate the delivery.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 31, 2023 |title=Boeing bids farewell to an icon, delivers last 747 jumbo jet |url= https://apnews.com/article/boeing-delivering-the-last-747-018b4b60e8d8a40aa5bf039c47d81a9a |access-date=February 1, 2023 |publisher=Associated Press}}</ref>
On July 2, 2020, it was reported that Boeing planned to end 747 production in 2022 upon delivery of the remaining jets on order to UPS and the Volga-Dnepr Group due to low demand.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Johnsson |first=Julie |date=July 2, 2020 |title=Boeing Quietly Pulls Plug on the 747, Closing Era of Jumbo Jets |work=Bloomberg |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-02/boeing-quietly-pulls-plug-on-the-747-closing-era-of-jumbo-jets |url-access=subscription}}</ref> On July 29, 2020, Boeing confirmed that the final 747 would be delivered in 2022 as a result of "current market dynamics and outlook" stemming from the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], according to CEO David Calhoun.<ref name="endofline">{{Cite web |last=Hemmerdinger |first=Jon |date=July 29, 2020 |title=Boeing slashes output, delays 777X to 2022 and confirms end for 747 |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/airframers/boeing-slashes-output-delays-777x-to-2022-and-confirms-end-for-747/139534.article |access-date=August 3, 2020 |publisher=Flightglobal}}</ref> The last aircraft, a 747-8F for [[Atlas Air]] registered N863GT, rolled off the production line on December 6, 2022,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Josephs |first=Leslie |date=December 6, 2022 |title=Boeing's last 747 has rolled out of the factory after a more than 50-year production run |work=[[CNBC]] |url= https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/06/boeing-747-production-is-ending-with-shift-to-twin-engine-jets.html}}</ref> and was delivered on January 31, 2023.<ref name="NYT Jan2023">{{Cite news |last1= Chokshi |first1=Niraj |last2= Menghistab |first2=Meron Tekie |last3= Tamayo |first3=Jovelle |last4= Wasson |first4=Lindsey |date= January 31, 2023 |title=The Last Boeing 747 Leaves the Factory |language=en-US |work= [[The New York Times]] |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/31/business/last-boeing-747-plane.html |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Boeing hosted an event at the Everett factory for thousands of workers as well as industry executives to commemorate the delivery.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 31, 2023 |title=Boeing bids farewell to an icon, delivers last 747 jumbo jet |url= https://apnews.com/article/boeing-delivering-the-last-747-018b4b60e8d8a40aa5bf039c47d81a9a |access-date=February 1, 2023 |publisher=Associated Press}}</ref>


== Design ==
== Design ==
[[File:Boeing 747-100 3-view.png|thumb|upright|Three-view diagram of the original Boeing 747-100, showing its general configuration maintained in later variants]]
[[File:Boeing 747-100 3-view.png|thumb|upright|Three-view diagram of the original 747-100, showing its general configuration maintained in later variants]]
{{for|design details of a particular generation|Boeing 747-400#Design{{!}}Boeing 747-400|Boeing 747-8#Design{{!}}747-8|Boeing 747SP#Design{{!}}747SP}}
{{for|design details of a particular generation|Boeing 747-400#Design{{!}}Boeing 747-400|Boeing 747-8#Design{{!}}747-8|Boeing 747SP#Design{{!}}747SP}}
[[File:Air New Zealand Boeing 747-400 (ZK-SUH) arrives London Heathrow 17Oct2010 arp.jpg|thumb|Front view showing the triple-slotted trailing edge [[flap (aeronautics)|flaps]]]]


The Boeing 747 is a large, wide-body (two-aisle) airliner with four wing-mounted engines. Its wings have a high [[swept wing|sweep]] angle of 37.5° for a fast, efficient cruise speed{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=93}} of Mach&nbsp;0.84 to 0.88, depending on the variant. The sweep also reduces the wingspan, allowing the 747 to use existing [[hangar]]s.<ref name=ucfc747 />{{sfn|Bowers|1989|page=508}} Its seating capacity is over 366 with a 3–4–3 seat arrangement (a cross section of three seats, an aisle, four seats, another aisle, and three seats) in economy class and a 2–3–2 layout in first class on the main deck. The upper deck has a 3–3 seat arrangement in economy class and a 2–2 layout in first class.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 1984 |title=Airplane description |url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/7471sec2.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060619025715/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/7471sec2.pdf |archive-date=June 19, 2006 |access-date=June 19, 2006}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref>
The 747 is a large, wide-body (two-aisle) airliner with four wing-mounted engines. Its wings have a high [[swept wing|sweep]] angle of 37.5° for a fast, efficient cruise speed{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=93}} of Mach&nbsp;0.84 to 0.88, depending on the variant. The sweep also reduces the wingspan, allowing the 747 to use existing [[hangar]]s.<ref name=ucfc747 />{{sfn|Bowers|1989|page=508}} Its seating capacity is over 366 with a 3–4–3 seat arrangement (two aisles with three seats on each side and four seats in the middle) in economy class and a 2–3–2 layout in first class on the main deck. The upper deck has a 3–3 seat arrangement in economy class and a 2–2 layout in first class.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 1984 |title=Airplane description |url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/7471sec2.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060619025715/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/7471sec2.pdf |archive-date=June 19, 2006 |access-date=June 19, 2006}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> Lavatories for later passenger models built from the 1980s onwards could be placed anywhere in the cabin through the installation of a central waste disposal system, dubbed the "sewer system", powered by an electric pump to provide suction. The "sewer system" was proposed by [[KLM]] chief engineer Gerald Lamb and initially tested on the [[Boeing 767]] before its installation on 747s.{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=393}}


Raised above the main deck, the cockpit creates a hump. This raised cockpit allows front loading of cargo on freight variants.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=93}} The upper deck behind the cockpit provides space for a lounge and/or extra seating. The "stretched upper deck" became available as an alternative on the {{not a typo|747-100B}} variant and later as standard beginning on the 747-300. The upper deck was stretched more on the 747-8. The 747 cockpit roof section also has an escape hatch from which crew can exit during the events of an emergency if they cannot do so through the cabin.
Seated 2 ft 7 in (0.79 m) above the floor of the main deck,{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=24}} the cockpit creates a hump. This raised cockpit allows front loading of cargo on freight variants.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=93}} The upper deck behind the cockpit provides space for a lounge and/or extra seating. Some operators also configured the upper deck with features other than passenger seating or lounges, such as the ''Skybeds'' of [[Philippine Airlines]]' 747-200Bs, which provided passengers with genuine beds fitted with seatbelts, enabling them to sleep during long-haul sectors.<ref name="Skybeds">{{cite web|url=https://travelupdate.com/philippine-airlines-flat-beds-747/|title=Wait, what?! Philippine Airlines had actual beds upstairs on the Boeing 747?|author=The Flight Detective|publisher=TravelUpdate|date=March 12, 2022}}</ref> The "stretched upper deck" became available as an alternative on the {{not a typo|747-100B}} variant and later as a standard configuration beginning with the 747-300. The upper deck was stretched further on the 747-8. The 747 cockpit roof section also has an escape hatch, from which the cockpit crew can exit during an emergency if they cannot do so through the cabin. An inertial reel attached to a cable is provided for each crew member to hold onto while exiting through the hatch and sliding down to the ground.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1986/09/05/Pan-Am-blames-hijack-on-lapse-in-airport-security/8601526276800/|location=New York|last=Caprino |first=Mariann|agency=[[United Press International]]|title=Pan Am blames hijack on lapse in airport security|date=September 5, 1986}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1986/09/05/The-escape-hatch-used-by-the-Pan-Am-cockpit/6482526276800/|title=The escape hatch used by the Pan Am cockpit...|location=Seattle|last=Spar |first=Penny |agency=[[United Press International]]|date=September 5, 1986}}</ref>


The 747's maximum takeoff weight ranges from {{Convert|735000|lb|t|abbr=out}} for the -100 to {{Convert|970000|lb|t|abbr=out}} for the -8. Its range has increased from {{Convert|5300|nmi|abbr=out}} on the -100 to {{Convert|8000|nmi|abbr=out}} on the -8I.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210173616/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classics.html "Boeing 747-100/200/300 Technical Specifications"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref><ref>[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/747-8_fact_sheet.html "Boeing 747-8 Technical Specifications"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref>
The 747's maximum takeoff weight ranges from {{Convert|735000|lb|t|abbr=out}} for the -100 to {{Convert|970000|lb|t|abbr=out}} for the -8. Its range has increased from {{Convert|5300|nmi|abbr=out}} on the -100 to {{Convert|8000|nmi|abbr=out}} on the -8I.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210173616/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classics.html "Boeing 747-100/200/300 Technical Specifications"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref><ref>[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/747-8_fact_sheet.html "Boeing 747-8 Technical Specifications"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref>


[[File:Air New Zealand Boeing 747-400 (ZK-SUH) arrives London Heathrow 17Oct2010 arp.jpg|thumb|Front view showing the triple-slotted trailing edge [[flap (aeronautics)|flaps]]]]
The 747 has redundant structures along with four redundant hydraulic systems and four main landing gears each with four wheels; these provide good support on the ground and safety in case of tire blow-outs. The main gear are redundant so that landing can be performed on two opposing landing gears if the others are not functioning properly.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=128-131}} The 747 also has split control surfaces and was designed with sophisticated triple-slotted flaps that minimize landing speeds and allow the 747 to use standard-length runways.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=121-122}}
The 747 has redundant structures along with four redundant hydraulic systems and four main landing gears each with four wheels; these provide a good spread of support on the ground and safety in case of tire blow-outs. The main gear are redundant so that landing can be performed on two opposing landing gears if the others are not functioning properly.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=128-131}} The 747 also has split control surfaces and was designed with sophisticated triple-slotted flaps that minimize landing speeds and allow the 747 to use standard-length runways.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=121-122}}
 
The undercarriage comprises a twin-wheeled nose gear and four sets of four-wheeled main gear bogies, two on the wing roots and two beneath the main fuselage. The bogies on the main fuselage are positioned behind the wing to accommodate heavy payloads and balance the load away from the nose gear, especially during takeoff and landing. The ground steering system of the landing gear is designed to enable the fuselage side bogies to move in concert with the nose gear. All the tires on the landing gear are tubeless and identical in size to facilitate interchangeability. Wheels on the main gear units of Classic variants were fitted with anti-skid [[Disc brake|disc brakes]].{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=38}} The 747-400 later introduced carbon brakes and provided instrumentation that enabled the cockpit panel to display tire pressure values.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=32}}
 
To transport spare engines, the 747 can accommodate a non-functioning fifth-pod engine under the aircraft's port wing between the inner functioning engine and the fuselage.<ref>{{Cite web |year=2008 |title=Special Report: Air India Flight 182 |url=http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-ai182.shtml |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091007035356/http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-ai182.shtml |archive-date=October 7, 2009 |access-date=December 13, 2007 |website=airdisaster.com}}</ref><ref>[http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/05/03/2005BCSC0350.htm "Her Majesty the Queen Against Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri"]. ''Supreme Court of British Columbia''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> Use of the fifth engine pod increases drag on the left side of the aircraft, which pilots need to compensate for by maintaining a consistent heading. When [[Air India Flight 182]], operated by a 747-237B named ''[[Emperor Kanishka]]'',{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=127}} broke apart over the [[Atlantic Ocean]] while ferrying a fifth engine on a scheduled flight from Montréal to London's [[Heathrow Airport]] on June 23, 1985, investigators considered the fifth engine pod a potential threat to the structural integrity of the 747's airframe. It was eventually ruled out as a cause of the crash after evaluation of the aircraft's [[flight data recorder]] (FDR) found no anomalies in the aircraft's handling, and the incident was revealed to have been caused by a terrorist [[Timeline of airliner bombing attacks|bombing]].<ref>{{cite episode |date=April 9, 2008 |title= Air India: Explosive Evidence |url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsywoxGY-As|series= Mayday|season= 5|number= 7|language= English|publisher= [[Cineflix]]}}</ref> The fifth engine mount point was used by [[Virgin Orbit]]'s [[LauncherOne]] program to carry an orbital-class rocket to cruise altitude where it was deployed.<ref>{{Cite news |date=August 28, 2018 |title=Virgin Orbit performs LauncherOne aircraft flight tests |work=SpaceNews.com |url=https://spacenews.com/virgin-orbit-performs-launcherone-aircraft-flight-tests/ |access-date=November 22, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Bergin |first=Chris |title=Cosmic Girl takes LauncherOne on its first captive carry flight test – NASASpaceFlight.com |work=NASASpaceflight.com |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2018/11/cosmic-girl-launcherone-first-captive-carry-test/ |access-date=November 22, 2018}}</ref>
 
Internally, the 747 Classic variants, comprising the -100/200/300/SP, were designed to be flown by two pilots and a [[Flight engineer|flight engineer]] relying on then-innovative electro-mechanical analog instruments for flight operations,{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=16}} which are either dual or triple redundant.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=27}} Specifications of individual aircraft were delivered in accordance with the requests of their respective customers,{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=27}} who were given the option to customize cockpit layouts through means such as choosing to install either dial or tape-style gauges.{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=18}} The introduction of digital cockpit displays on the 747-400 later gave pilots the option to choose between displaying either dial or tape-style indicators by programming the display driver without the need to reinstrument the cockpit as was done for the Classic variants' analog cockpits.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=31}} Unlike the earlier [[Boeing 707|707]], the 747 did not need a [[Navigator|navigator]] in the cockpit, as it was the first commercial aircraft to utilize an [[Inertial navigation system|inertial navigation system]] (INS). Among the other advanced technologies included in the 747 were an [[Autothrottle|autothrottle]] for automatic airspeed control and a [[Flight management system|performance management system]] (PMS).{{sfn|Seo|1984|pages=16-18}}
 
The 747-400, launched in October 1985, replaced analog instruments with [[Electronic flight instrument system|electronic flight instrument systems]] (EFIS) similar to those of the Boeing [[Boeing 757|757]] and [[Boeing 767|767]].{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=79}}{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=257-259}} These technologies reduced the number of cockpit instruments to 300 indicators and 200 switches from the nearly 690 dials and lights and 280 switches found in Classic variants,{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=33}} and they also enabled the -400 to be manned by two pilots, eliminating the flight engineer's position of previous variants.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=79}}


For transportation of spare engines, the 747 can accommodate a non-functioning fifth-pod engine under the aircraft's port wing between the inner functioning engine and the fuselage.<ref>{{Cite web |year=2008 |title=Special Report: Air India Flight 182 |url=http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-ai182.shtml |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091007035356/http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-ai182.shtml |archive-date=October 7, 2009 |access-date=December 13, 2007 |website=airdisaster.com}}</ref><ref>[http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/05/03/2005BCSC0350.htm "Her Majesty the Queen Against Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri"]. ''Supreme Court of British Columbia''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> The fifth engine mount point was also used by [[Virgin Orbit]]'s [[LauncherOne]] program to carry an orbital-class rocket to cruise altitude where it was deployed.<ref>{{Cite news |date=August 28, 2018 |title=Virgin Orbit performs LauncherOne aircraft flight tests |work=SpaceNews.com |url=https://spacenews.com/virgin-orbit-performs-launcherone-aircraft-flight-tests/ |access-date=November 22, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Bergin |first=Chris |title=Cosmic Girl takes LauncherOne on its first captive carry flight test – NASASpaceFlight.com |work=NASASpaceflight.com |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2018/11/cosmic-girl-launcherone-first-captive-carry-test/ |access-date=November 22, 2018}}</ref>
On average, a 747 Classic airframe has approximately {{cvt|135|miles|km|round=5}} of electrical wiring and {{cvt|1|mile|km|1}} of hydraulics to power its systems. The wiring was reduced by about 30% for the 747-400.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=27}}


== Operational history ==
== Operational history ==
After the aircraft's introduction with Pan Am in 1970, other airlines that had bought the 747 to stay competitive began to put their own 747s into service.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127015922/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878679-1,00.html "Ready or Not, Here Comes Jumbo"]. ''Time'', January 19, 1970. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.</ref> Boeing estimated that half of the early 747 sales were to airlines desiring the aircraft's long range rather than its payload capacity.<ref>Smith, Bruce A. "Boeing Shuns Very Large Jets While Aiming for Longer Range." ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'', January 1, 2001, pp. 28–29.</ref><ref>[http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/A380Buescher.pdf 747X vs A380 "How to Reduce Congestion"] (PDF). {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080216064540/http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/A380Buescher.pdf|date=February 16, 2008}} ''Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering'', Virginia Tech. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.</ref> While the 747 had the lowest potential operating cost per seat, this could only be achieved when the aircraft was fully loaded; costs per seat increased rapidly as occupancy declined. A moderately loaded 747, one with only 70 percent of its seats occupied, used more than 95 percent of the fuel needed by a fully occupied 747.<ref>[http://www2.mst.dk/common/Udgivramme/Frame.asp?pg=http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/2003/87-7972-489-2/html/kap09_eng.htm "Airline reporting on fuel consumption."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071220020946/http://www2.mst.dk/common/Udgivramme/Frame.asp?pg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.mst.dk%2Fudgiv%2FPublications%2F2003%2F87-7972-489-2%2Fhtml%2Fkap09_eng.htm|date=December 20, 2007}} ''Miljominsteriet (Danish Environmental Protection Agency)''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> Nonetheless, many flag-carriers purchased the 747 due to its prestige "even if it made no sense economically" to operate. During the 1970s and 1980s, over 30 regularly scheduled 747s could often be seen at [[John F. Kennedy International Airport]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 4, 2013 |title=Boeing 747 On Deathwatch: How Boeing's New 777X Will Kill Its Jumbo Jet Predecessor, Once The Queen Of The Skies |url=http://www.ibtimes.com/boeing-747-deathwatch-how-boeings-new-777x-will-kill-its-jumbo-jet-predecessor-once-queen-skies |website=[[International Business Times]]}}</ref>
=== Commercial service ===
==== Passenger operators ====
[[File:Pat Nixon christens Boeing 747 2749-18.jpg|thumb|First Lady [[Pat Nixon]] christened the first commercial 747 on January 15, 1970.]]
 
On January 15, 1970, [[First Lady of the United States|First Lady]] [[Pat Nixon]] christened [[Pan Am]]'s first 747 at [[Washington Dulles International Airport|Dulles International Airport]]<!--(later Washington Dulles International Airport)--> in the presence of Pan Am chairman [[Najeeb Halaby]].<ref name=pwcgj>{{cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=K6hVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9OADAAAAIBAJ&pg=6406%2C3076731 |work=Eugene Register-Guard |location=Oregon |agency=Associated Press |title=President's wife christens giant jet |date=January 15, 1970 |page=5A}}</ref> Instead of champagne, red, white, and blue water was sprayed on the aircraft.
 
The 747 entered service on January 22, 1970, on Pan Am's New York–London route.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=48}} The flight had been planned for the evening of January 21, but engine overheating made the original aircraft (Clipper Young America, registration N735PA) unusable. Finding a substitute delayed the flight by more than six hours to the following day when [[Clipper Victor]] (registration N736PA) was used.<ref name="Time_Jumbo-Gremlins">[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127015913/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878184,00.html "Jumbo and the Gremlins"]. ''Time'', February 2, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title= About the 747 Family |url= http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121002063408/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |archive-date=October 2, 2012 |publisher=Boeing Commercial Airplanes}}</ref> The 747 enjoyed a fairly smooth introduction into service, overcoming concerns that some airports would not be able to accommodate an aircraft that large.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127061820/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,899789,00.html "Breaking the Ground Barrier"]. ''Time'', September 8, 1967. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.</ref> Although technical problems occurred, they were relatively minor and quickly solved.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127122755/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,909472,00.html "Jumbo Beats the Gremlins"]. ''Time'', July 13, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.</ref> Pan Am soon expanded its network of transatlantic 747 operations to various destinations in Europe, namely Amsterdam, Barcelona, Brussels, Frankfurt, Lisbon, Paris, and Rome, from hubs in New York and London's [[Heathrow Airport]] before commencing transpacific operations from Los Angeles and San Francisco to Honolulu, Hong Kong, and Tokyo once enough aircraft were delivered.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=24}}{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=50}} The Los Angeles and San Francisco hubs were connected to London and Paris via [[polar route]]s, and Pan Am 747s also flew from Chicago to Frankfurt and London and from New York to San Juan.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=50}}
 
After the aircraft's introduction with launch customer Pan Am in 1970, other airlines that had bought the 747 to stay competitive began to put their own 747s into service.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080127015922/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878679-1,00.html "Ready or Not, Here Comes Jumbo"]. ''Time'', January 19, 1970. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.</ref> Within months after the inaugural 747 service, Pan Am faced competition on international routes from other US-based carriers, specifically [[Trans World Airlines]] (TWA) on transatlantic routes and [[Northwest Airlines]] on transpacific routes.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=203-204}} TWA initially commenced 747 operations on its domestic network with a New York–Los Angeles service before placing the type into service on its New York–London route in March 1970, while Northwest commenced 747 services between New York, Chicago, Seattle, and Tokyo that same year in July.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=24}}{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=51}} Pan Am also competed with foreign carriers such as [[Air France]], [[Japan Airlines]], and [[Lufthansa]] within the first year of 747 service.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=204}}
 
Within the United States, the 747 was introduced on domestic routes. [[American Airlines]] introduced the 747-100 on the New York–Los Angeles route in March 1970, using aircraft leased from Pan Am, as American's own 747 fleet was not delivered from Boeing until later in the year. [[Braniff International Airways]], [[Continental Airlines]], [[Delta Airlines]], [[Eastern Airlines]], [[National Airlines (1934–1980)|National Airlines]], and [[United Airlines]] soon inaugurated their own domestic services with 747s between 1970 and 1971.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|pages=24-25}}
 
Boeing estimated that half of the early 747 sales were to airlines desiring the aircraft's long range rather than its payload capacity.<ref>Smith, Bruce A. "Boeing Shuns Very Large Jets While Aiming for Longer Range." ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'', January 1, 2001, pp. 28–29.</ref><ref>[http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/A380Buescher.pdf 747X vs A380 "How to Reduce Congestion"] (PDF). {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080216064540/http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/A380Buescher.pdf|date=February 16, 2008}} ''Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering'', Virginia Tech. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.</ref> While the 747 had the lowest potential operating cost per seat, this could only be achieved when the aircraft was fully loaded; costs per seat increased rapidly as occupancy declined. A moderately loaded 747, one with only 70 percent of its seats occupied, used more than 95 percent of the fuel needed by a fully occupied 747.<ref>[http://www2.mst.dk/common/Udgivramme/Frame.asp?pg=http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/2003/87-7972-489-2/html/kap09_eng.htm "Airline reporting on fuel consumption."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071220020946/http://www2.mst.dk/common/Udgivramme/Frame.asp?pg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.mst.dk%2Fudgiv%2FPublications%2F2003%2F87-7972-489-2%2Fhtml%2Fkap09_eng.htm|date=December 20, 2007}} ''Miljominsteriet (Danish Environmental Protection Agency)''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> Nonetheless, many flag-carriers purchased the 747 due to its prestige, "even if it made no sense economically" to operate. During the 1970s and 1980s, over 30 regularly scheduled 747s could often be seen at [[John F. Kennedy International Airport]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 4, 2013 |title=Boeing 747 On Deathwatch: How Boeing's New 777X Will Kill Its Jumbo Jet Predecessor, Once The Queen Of The Skies |url=http://www.ibtimes.com/boeing-747-deathwatch-how-boeings-new-777x-will-kill-its-jumbo-jet-predecessor-once-queen-skies |website=[[International Business Times]]}}</ref>


The [[recession of 1969–1970]], despite having been characterized as relatively mild, greatly affected Boeing. For the year and a half after September 1970, it only sold two 747s in the world, both to Irish flag carrier [[Aer Lingus]].<ref>{{Citation |title=Supplementary Estimates, 1971–72 – Vote 41: Transport and Power |date=November 25, 1971 |url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1971112500009?opendocument |volume=257 |issue=3 |page=9 |publisher=Houses of the Oireachtas |quote=The company took delivery of two Boeing 747s (Jumbos) in March 1971, and they went into service in April and May. The Aerlínte fleet now consists of 6 Boeing 707-320s and 2 Boeing 747s.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |date=March 25, 1971 |title=Aer Lingus On Its Own |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1971/1971%20-%200442.html |journal=[[Flight International]] |quote=A SECOND 747 will be delivered to Aer Lingus-Irish within the next two weeks to join the first which arrived in Dublin on March 6.}}</ref>
The [[recession of 1969–1970]], despite having been characterized as relatively mild, greatly affected Boeing. For the year and a half after September 1970, it only sold two 747s in the world, both to Irish flag carrier [[Aer Lingus]].<ref>{{Citation |title=Supplementary Estimates, 1971–72 – Vote 41: Transport and Power |date=November 25, 1971 |url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1971112500009?opendocument |volume=257 |issue=3 |page=9 |publisher=Houses of the Oireachtas |quote=The company took delivery of two Boeing 747s (Jumbos) in March 1971, and they went into service in April and May. The Aerlínte fleet now consists of 6 Boeing 707-320s and 2 Boeing 747s.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |date=March 25, 1971 |title=Aer Lingus On Its Own |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1971/1971%20-%200442.html |journal=[[Flight International]] |quote=A SECOND 747 will be delivered to Aer Lingus-Irish within the next two weeks to join the first which arrived in Dublin on March 6.}}</ref>
No 747s were sold to any American carrier for almost three years.{{r|heppenheimer1998}} When economic problems in the US and other countries after the [[1973 oil crisis]] led to reduced passenger traffic, several airlines found they did not have enough passengers to fly the 747 economically, and they replaced them with the smaller and recently introduced [[McDonnell Douglas DC-10]] and [[Lockheed L-1011 TriStar]] [[trijet]] wide bodies<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070202010508/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,876705,00.html "Planes for Rough Weather"]. ''Time'', August 3, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.</ref> (and later the [[Boeing 767|767]] and [[Airbus A300]]/[[Airbus A310|A310]] [[twinjet]]s). Having tried replacing coach seats on its 747s with piano bars in an attempt to attract more customers, American Airlines eventually relegated its 747s to cargo service and in 1983 exchanged them with Pan Am for smaller aircraft;<ref>[https://archive.today/20120526202629/http://www.aa.com/i18n/amrcorp/corporateInformation/facts/history.jsp "American Airlines History"]. ''American Airlines''. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.</ref> [[Delta Air Lines]] also removed its 747s from service after several years.<ref>Davies 1990, p. 96.</ref> Later, Delta acquired 747s again in 2008 as part of its merger with [[Northwest Airlines]], although it retired the [[Boeing 747-400]] fleet in December 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Final 747 flight now scheduled for Monday |url=https://news.delta.com/final-747-flight-now-scheduled-monday |access-date=May 10, 2018 |website=Delta News Hub |language=en}}</ref>
No 747s were sold to any American carrier for almost three years.{{r|heppenheimer1998}} When economic problems in the US and other countries after the [[1973 oil crisis]] led to reduced passenger traffic, several airlines found they did not have enough passengers to fly the 747 economically, and they replaced them with the smaller and recently introduced [[McDonnell Douglas DC-10]] and [[Lockheed L-1011 TriStar]] [[trijet]] wide bodies<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070202010508/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,876705,00.html "Planes for Rough Weather"]. ''Time'', August 3, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.</ref> (and later the [[Boeing 767|767]] and [[Airbus A300]]/[[Airbus A310|A310]] [[twinjet]]s). Having tried replacing coach seats on its 747s with piano bars in an attempt to attract more customers, American Airlines eventually relegated its 747s to cargo service and, in 1983, exchanged them with Pan Am for smaller aircraft;<ref>[https://archive.today/20120526202629/http://www.aa.com/i18n/amrcorp/corporateInformation/facts/history.jsp "American Airlines History"]. ''American Airlines''. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.</ref> Continental Airlines and Delta Airlines also removed their 747-100s from service not long after their introduction and replaced them with DC-10s and L-1011s, respectively,<ref>Davies 1990, p. 96.</ref>{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=56}} but both airlines would later reacquire 747s and continue operating them through mergers with other carriers. Continental operated the 747-100 again after merging with [[People Express Airlines (1980s)|PEOPLExpress]] in 1987,{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=16}} while Delta acquired the [[Boeing 747-400|747-400]] fleet of Northwest Airlines as part of their merger in 2008, although Delta retired the -400s in December 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Final 747 flight now scheduled for Monday |url=https://news.delta.com/final-747-flight-now-scheduled-monday |access-date=May 10, 2018 |website=Delta News Hub |language=en}}</ref>
 
[[File:Boeing 747 JAL.jpg|thumb|A Boeing 747 Classic of [[Japan Airlines]], the type's all-time largest operator, over [[Mount Fuji]], c. 1970s.]]
 
The 747 saw the most success as the primary long-haul aircraft for airlines operating in [[Europe]] and the [[Asia-Pacific]] region,{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=217}} where it had been introduced by airlines based in those regions within its first year of service in 1970. Lufthansa became the first European operator of the 747 and the first carrier outside the United States to inaugurate 747 services when its first 747-100 was delivered on March 10, 1970, and entered service on the Frankfurt–New York route the following month, replacing the smaller 707s that were previously flown.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=26}} Japan Airlines commenced 747 operations in June 1970 with routes between Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Los Angeles, making it the first Asian operator of the 747.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=51}} [[Air India]] followed Japan Airlines as the second Asian operator of the 747 with the acquisition of 747-200s in 1971 as replacements for older 707s on the airline's routes to London and New York.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|pages=30, 52}} By 1971, more European carriers like Aer Lingus, [[British Overseas Airways Corporation]] (BOAC), and [[Sabena]], had acquired their own fleets of 747-100s,{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=26}} and European airlines that had previously not purchased any Boeing aircraft, such as [[Alitalia]], [[KLM]], and [[Scandinavian Airlines]] (SAS), chose the 747 as their first Boeing aircraft to remain competitive on long-haul routes.{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=157}}{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=30}}{{sfn|Pealing|Savage|1999|page=43}} KLM, the launch customer of the improved 747-200B variant introduced in February 1971,{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=50}} had formed the KSSU consortium in 1968 with SAS, [[Swissair]], and [[Union de Transports Aériens]] (UTA) to provide a maintenance and training pool for 747 operators while providing technical advice for the 747's development.<ref name="KLM742">{{Cite web|url=https://www.key.aero/article/klms-dutch-queens-sky|title=KLM's Dutch Queens of the Skies|last=Cross |first=Lee|publisher=Key.Aero|date=7 April 2021|access-date=16 February 2024|archive-date=16 February 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240216111215/https://www.key.aero/article/klms-dutch-queens-sky|url-status=live}} {{subscription required}}</ref>
 
The 747 mainly appealed to Asian and European operators due to having more range than its contemporaries, the DC-10 and L-1011.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=217}}<ref name="KLDC10">{{Cite web |title= MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - KLM |url=http://www.taxiways.de/DC-10/D10operator/KLM.html|access-date=18 May 2026 |website=taxiways.de}}</ref> Partly in response to accidents involving the DC-10 and the grounding of DC-10 fleets around the world in 1979,<ref>{{Cite web |title= MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - Air New Zealand |url=http://www.taxiways.de/DC-10/D10operator/Air_NZ.html|access-date=17 May 2026 |website=taxiways.de}}</ref> some airlines, such as [[Air New Zealand]], Alitalia, and [[Singapore Airlines]], completely replaced their DC-10s with 747s for fleet standardisation and deployed the latter on routes previously assigned to the former;{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=51}}<ref>{{Cite web |title= MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - Alitalia |url=http://www.taxiways.de/DC-10/D10operator/Alitalia.html|access-date=17 May 2026 |website=taxiways.de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title= MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - Singapore Airlines |url=http://www.taxiways.de/DC-10/D10operator/SIA.html|access-date=17 May 2026 |website=taxiways.de}}</ref> [[Pakistan International Airlines]] (PIA) traded its remaining DC-10s with [[Canadian Pacific Air Lines]] (also known as CP Air) for the latter airline's 747-200s in 1986.<ref>{{Cite web |title= MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - PAKISTAN |url=http://www.taxiways.de/DC-10/D10operator/PIA.html|access-date=17 May 2026 |website=taxiways.de}}</ref> Other airlines maintained fleets of smaller widebody types as complements to the 747 and assigned them to routes that either had airports too small to accommodate the 747 or did not have enough passenger traffic to fill a 747, as was the case for operators like Japan Airlines, KLM, Northwest Airlines, and [[Philippine Airlines]] that expanded their 747 fleets while simultaneously operating DC-10s during the 1980s.<ref name="KLDC10"/><ref>{{Cite web |title= MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - JAL - JAPAN AIR LINES|url=http://www.taxiways.de/DC-10/D10operator/JAL.html|access-date=18 May 2026 |website=taxiways.de}}</ref>{{sfn|Seo|1984|pages=53}}<ref>{{cite news|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=46EVAAAAIBAJ&pg=PA6&article_id=2810,3527224|location=Metro Manila, Philippines|agency=Manila Standard|title=PAL marks 25th anniversary on Pacific run today|date=June 20, 1987|page=6}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1370&dat=19871108&id=i2cVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=agsEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3764,443512|location=Metro Manila, Philippines|agency=Manila Standard|title=PAL acquires 5th 747 to expand services|date=November 8, 1987|page=2}}</ref> L-1011s were also operated alongside 747s in the fleets of airlines like [[Air Canada]], [[All Nippon Airways]] (ANA), [[British Airways]], [[Cathay Pacific]], [[Saudia]], and TWA,{{sfn|Seo|1984|pages=50, 54, 77}}{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|pages=191-193, 202, 204}} while airlines such as Air France, Alitalia, [[Garuda Indonesia]], [[Korean Air]], Lufthansa, [[Malaysia Airlines]], [[South African Airways]], and [[Thai Airways International|Thai Airways]] operated A300s together with their 747s.{{sfn|Seo|1984|pages=46, 50, 66, 69, 80}}{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|pages=195, 197-198, 203}} In much rarer cases observed during the 1980s, there were airlines whose widebody fleets were purely composed of 747s until the introduction of other types, examples including [[Aerolineas Argentinas]], Air India, [[Avianca]], and [[Qantas]].{{sfn|Seo|1984|pages=51-52, 61}}
 
[[File:1981-09-15 12-00-00 United States Hawaii Aliamanu.JPG|thumb|747s at [[Honolulu International Airport]] in 1981. The 747 was a common sight at airports along the [[Pacific Ocean]].]]
 
Many international carriers used the 747 on [[Pacific Ocean|Pacific]] routes,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Aboulafia |first=Richard |date=March 1, 2004 |title=Commercial Transport Market Still in Rough Shape |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news/2004sb05.xml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112160220/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news%2F2004sb05.xml |archive-date=January 12, 2012 |access-date=December 10, 2007 |website=Aviation Week and Space Technology}}</ref> while ANA and Japan Airlines deployed short-range 747 models on Japanese domestic routes. 747s specially designed for short-haul operations were offered to ANA and Japan Airlines as a response to the rapid growth of Japanese domestic traffic in the late 1960s, which had reached an average domestic load factor of 85% by 1970 and could not be efficiently addressed by smaller [[Boeing 727]]s and [[Douglas DC-8]]s that were then in operation with the two airlines.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=100-102}} The original series of aircraft, known as the 747SR and based on the 747-100, was configured to carry over 550 people, close to the maximum passenger capacity.{{sfn|Seo|1984|pages=44-45}}{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=102}}<ref>{{cite news |last=Wallace |first=James |url=http://www.seattlepi.com/default/article/A380-buyer-keeps-mum-about-possible-luxuries-1164814.php |title=A380 buyer keeps mum about possible luxuries aboard cruise ship of the skies |newspaper=Seattle Post-Intelligencer |date=January 24, 2005 |access-date=June 3, 2011}}</ref>
 
The 747's prominence at airports in the Asia-Pacific region was noticed by its chief designer, [[Joe Sutter]], who frequently traveled to Asia on business trips during his lifetime and wrote about his habit of watching 747s at airports beginning in the mid-1980s. On one such trip to Japan, he recalled counting 55 747s at [[Narita International Airport]] in Tokyo while waiting for his flight home, remarking in his autobiography that the 747s "clustered as thickly as single-aisle [[Boeing 737|737]]s do at U.S. airports." Sutter estimated that, assuming each 747 was at most 75% occupied, they carried as many as 20,000 people within the two hours he spent watching 747s arrive at Narita Airport.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=262}}
 
International flights bypassing traditional hub airports and landing at smaller cities became more common throughout the 1980s, thus eroding the 747's original market.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20040211224743/http://www.boeing.com/news/speeches/2003/piasecki_030324.html "Turning Today's Challenges into Opportunities for Tomorrow"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.</ref> Airlines leased additional 747s to accommodate increased passenger flow between destinations during special occasions. For instance, airlines in Muslim-majority countries like Garuda Indonesia leased additional 747s for flights to [[Jeddah]] during the annual [[Hajj]] pilgrimage.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=58}}
 
==== Freighter operators ====
Just as the design team had envisioned, the 747 also saw use as a freighter. Its design enabled not only the assembly of dedicated freighter aircraft but also the conversion of surplus airframes that were no longer wanted by passenger airlines,{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=68}} as the design team expected during its development that 747s would see more frequent usage as freighters as demand for passenger-carrying 747s would wane.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=104}}
 
However, while the design team assumed that this decrease in demand for passenger 747s would come as a result of increased interest in the [[supersonic airliners]] in development at the time, such as [[Concorde]] and the cancelled [[Boeing 2707]], this ultimately did not happen;{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=104}} instead, this decrease was caused by the introduction of [[ETOPS]]-capable widebody [[twinjet]]s from the 1980s to the 2000s, such as the [[Airbus A310]] and [[Airbus A330|A330]] and Boeing's own [[Boeing 767|767]], [[Boeing 777|777]], and [[Boeing 787|787]], which were more efficient to operate than the trijets and quadjets which preceded them. Indeed, tri- and quadjet designs from the same era - including the [[Airbus A380]], which was designed to compete directly with the 747 - struggled to reach commercial success.<ref>https://leehamnews.com/2014/06/30/the-struggling-boeing-747-8/</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title= United Airlines does not see a fit for Airbus A380 |url= https://www.reuters.com/article/united-airlines-fleet-idUSL1N0YQ00Z20150604 |work= Reuters |date= 4 June 2015 |last= Dastin |first= Jeffrey |access-date= 30 June 2017 |archive-date= 17 October 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151017020432/http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/04/united-airlines-fleet-idUSL1N0YQ00Z20150604 |url-status= live}}</ref>
 
Dedicated freighter variants were typically assembled with an upward-opening hinged nose and a side cargo door for freight loading, while conversions on former passenger airframes only added the side cargo door and reinforced the main deck floor while removing seats, galleys, toilets, overhead baggage stowage, and other passenger accommodations.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=68}}
 
The first dedicated freighter variant was the 747-200F introduced by [[Lufthansa Cargo]] (then an in-house division of Lufthansa), which took delivery of the first -200F on March 9, 1972. Lufthansa Cargo was the sole operator of the type until [[Air France]], [[Japan Airlines]], and [[Seaboard World Airlines]] followed with their own orders for 747-200Fs in 1974.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|pages=68-69}} Around this time, the first conversion from a passenger airframe was conducted in 1974 at Boeing's [[Spirit AeroSystems|Wichita plant]] on an ex-[[American Airlines]] 747-100 acquired by [[Flying Tiger Line]]. Within the decade, Boeing Wichita performed freighter conversions on ex-passenger 747-100s operated by American Airlines, [[Pan Am]], and the [[Imperial Iranian Air Force]] (IIAF).{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=104-105}}
 
By the 1990s, many older 747s that had been phased out from the fleets of passenger airlines found themselves in the hands of cargo operators who needed them to transport heavy freight loads across long distances. They became a favored choice of aircraft for small cargo carriers at the time, particularly those in the United States, such as [[Atlas Air]], [[Kalitta Air]], and [[Southern Air Transport]].{{sfn|Morton|1997|pages=96-99}}
 
=== Government and military service ===
==== United States ====
===== United States Air Force =====
{{See also|Boeing E-4|Boeing VC-25}}
 
[[File:Fuel on the go (7277495).jpg|thumb|[[Boeing E-4|E-4B]] airborne command post as seen from a [[Boeing KC-135|KC-135]] tanker]]
 
The [[United States Air Force]] (USAF) operates specially designed variants of the Boeing 747 for its purposes, namely the [[Boeing E-4|E-4B]] airborne command posts of the National Emergency Airborne Command Post (NEACP) program and the [[Boeing VC-25|VC-25]] presidential transports.{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=58}}{{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=39-40, 43-44}} Both aircraft were developed as replacements for [[Boeing KC-135|KC-135]]/[[Boeing 707|707]] derivatives that previously performed their respective roles, with the E-4 replacing the [[Boeing EC-135|EC-135]] in 1973 and the VC-25 replacing the [[Boeing C-137 Stratoliner|VC-137C]] in 1990.{{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=39-40, 43-44}}{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=106-107}}
 
The first three E-4 airframes were initially designated E-4A and delivered between June 1973 and October 1974{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=91}} with almost the same equipment as the EC-135, albeit with minor updates.{{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=39-40}} In  May 1975, the fourth aircraft was delivered as the updated E-4B,{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=92}} which introduced a super-high-frequency (SHF) satellite antenna mounted on the upper deck roof among other upgrades. Its design, however, was not finalized until January 1980. The first three aircraft were subsequently updated to E-4B specifications between 1983 and 1985.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=107}}
 
[[File:Members of the 372nd Transportation, 101st Airborne Division, disembark a 747 Flying Tiger aircraft during exercise Ocean Venture '82 - DPLA - 19128c7c75bd888955472aedd85559fa.jpeg|thumb|U.S. Army infantrymen of the [[101st Airborne Division]] disembarking from a [[Flying Tiger Line]] Boeing 747-200F deployed at [[Roosevelt Roads Naval Station]] for Exercise Ocean Venture, 1982.]]
 
Aside from the variants developed specifically for the USAF, some civilian 747s were chartered for USAF missions. One of the earliest deployments of civilian 747s into military service was [[Operation Babylift]], the mass evacuation of [[South Vietnam|South Vietnamese]] children to the United States during the closing stages of the [[Vietnam War]]. On April 5, 1975, two 747s of [[Pan Am]] were privately chartered to assist USAF [[Military Airlift Command]] (MAC) transport aircraft in carrying 728 children from [[Tan Son Nhat International Airport]] in [[Saigon]] to the US West Coast, with one aircraft going to San Francisco and the other to Seattle.<ref name="babylift">{{Cite book |title=MAC and Operation BABYLIFT: Air Transport in Support of Noncombatant Evacuation Operations|url=https://media.defense.gov/2012/Aug/31/2001330018/-1/-1/0/AFD-120831-032.pdf|last=Cross |first=Coy F. II|publisher=[[Military Airlift Command]]|date=November 1989|access-date=16 May 2026}}</ref>{{Reference page|page=50,52,59}}<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thepanammuseum.org/operation-babylift/|title=Operation Babylift|publisher=Pan Am Museum Foundation|date=16 March 2022}}</ref> Seven days later on April 12, a [[World Airways]] 747-200C (all of World Airways' 747s at that time were 747-200C models){{sfn|Minton|1991|page=90-91}} was chartered to transport 329 children who had been left behind in [[Clark Air Base]] in [[Angeles City]], Philippines, to Los Angeles.<ref name="babylift"/>{{Reference page|page=58}}
 
Pan Am 747s would again see military service one more time after Operation Babylift and before the airline ceased operations in 1991, this time as volunteer aircraft for the [[Civil Reserve Air Fleet]] (CRAF) during the 1980s and 1990s.<ref name="CRAF">{{Cite web|url=https://www.panam.org/global-era/airlift-paa-the-craf|title=AIRLIFT: PAN AM AND THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET|publisher=Pan Am Historical Foundation|access-date=16 May 2026}}</ref> Between 1985 and 1990, 19 of Pan Am's 747s, comprising 15 747-100s and 4 747-200Bs, were converted at [[Spirit AeroSystems|Boeing Wichita]] for CRAF use as either troop transports or freighters in the event of a national emergency.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=44}}{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=106}}<ref name="747Fguide">{{Cite web|url=https://www.key.aero/article/boeing-747-freighters-your-complete-guide|title=Boeing 747 freighters: your complete guide|last=Willis |first=David|publisher=Key.Aero|date=26 January 2023}} {{subscription required}}</ref> Much like the 747-200C variant, the modified 747s, which were given the USAF designation C-19A, could be converted between passenger and freighter configurations, which was made possible by the installation of strengthened floor beams and a side cargo door aft of the left wing.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=44}} The fuselage reinforcements and additional cargo door on the main deck added {{Convert|13000|lb|t|abbr=out}} to the empty weight of each aircraft, prompting the USAF to pay compensation for the increased weight whenever these aircraft were used on Pan Am's commercial flights.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=106}} Three Pan Am aircraft were notably deployed along with 747s of [[Northwest Airlines]] as troop transports for [[Operation Desert Storm]] in 1990.<ref name="CRAF"/> Although none of the Pan Am 747s were destroyed during combat missions, one of the converted aircraft, a 747-121 named ''Clipper Maid of the Seas'', was lost to a terrorist [[Timeline of airliner bombing attacks|bomb attack]] while flying over [[Lockerbie]], Scotland, as [[Pan Am Flight 103]], a scheduled commercial flight, on December 21, 1988.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=127}}{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=44}}
 
Although Boeing had attempted to convince to USAF to buy its own dedicated fleet of 747 freighters in two separate instances between the 1980s and 1990s, it rejected these in favor of additional [[Lockheed C-5]]s and, later, [[Boeing C-17]]s.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=108, 110}} The USAF did, however, charter 747s from airlines like [[Evergreen International Airlines]], [[Flying Tiger Line]], and [[Tower Air]] to conduct transport missions to overseas bases outside the United States.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|pages=14, 72, 76}}
 
===== NASA =====
{{Main|Shuttle Carrier Aircraft|Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy}}
[[File:OV-101 first flight.jpg|thumb| Shuttle Carrier Aircraft N905NA releasing the [[Space Shuttle Enterprise|Space Shuttle ''Enterprise'']] for a free flight test in 1977. N905NA is seen here partially painted in its former [[American Airlines]] livery with [[NASA]] titles.]]
[[File:The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA).jpg|thumb| The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA)]]
 
The 747 participated in the American space program through [[NASA]]'s usage of two secondhand 747s, comprising one 747-100 from [[American Airlines]] and one 747SR from [[Japan Airlines]],{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=113}} as the [[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]] (SCA){{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=41-43}} and one ex-[[Pan Am]] 747SP as the [[Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy]] (SOFIA).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sofia.usra.edu/Sofia/aircraft/sofia_ac.htm |title=About SOFIA: Aircraft: Flying in a Boeing 747SP |website=NASA SOFIA Science Center |date=October 5, 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061113003337/http://www.sofia.usra.edu/Sofia/aircraft/sofia_ac.htm |archive-date=November 13, 2006}}</ref>{{sfn|Rosson|2025|pages=47-48}}
 
The Shuttle Carrier Aircraft was proposed as a solution to the logistical challenges of transporting [[Space Shuttle]] orbiters after each mission across the continental United States from their landing site in [[Edwards Air Force Base]] in  California to the launch site in [[Kennedy Space Center]] in Florida.{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=58}}{{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=41-43}} The proposal materialized when the first airframe, an ex-American Airlines 747-123 registered as N905NA and previously used for vortex flow research, was converted by Boeing with components developed at NASA's [[Armstrong Flight Research Center|Dryden Flight Research Center]] to enable the mounting and dismounting of the shuttle orbiters from the top of the aircraft's fuselage. From February 18 to August 13, 1977, the aircraft was deployed on a three-phase series of flights to test its handling with the [[Space Shuttle Enterprise|Space Shuttle ''Enterprise'']] mounted on top, with the third flight being the first of five involving the release of a manned shuttle from the 747 in mid-air to enable the former to enter free flight and have its flight characteristics evaluated while the Shuttle crew glided back to Edwards Air Force Base.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=112}} Once the test flights concluded, N905NA was used to perform its originally proposed purpose of ferrying Space Shuttles between their landing and launch sites. In 1988, it was accompanied by a second aircraft, a 747SR-46 acquired from Japan Airlines and re-registered as N911NA in NASA service;{{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=41-43}}{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=112}} N911NA was also the first production 747SR and had been delivered to Japan Airlines in 1973 to operate on its domestic routes.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=91}}{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=103}}
 
In 1997, NASA acquired an ex-Pan Am 747SP-21, named ''Clipper Lindbergh'' in honor of [[Charles Lindbergh]], for use as the Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA). The aircraft was modified by [[Raytheon]] with an {{cvt|18x13.5|ft|m|1}} door on the left side of the fuselage to accommodate a large reflector telescope, which was assembled in Germany and shipped to the United States for mounting on the airframe in 2004. The aircraft was operational with the telescope by 2010 and conducted a series of observatory flights until its retirement in 2022 due to rising operational costs.{{sfn|Rosson|2025|pages=47-48}} The aircraft currently survives in preservation at the [[Pima Air and Space Museum]] in Tucson, Arizona.<ref name="FisherA22"/>
 
==== Iran ====
[[File:IIAF Boeing 707 refuels IIAF Boeing 747.jpg|thumb|[[Imperial Iranian Air Force]] (IIAF) Boeing 747-100F refueling from a [[Boeing 707#Military versions|KC-707]] tanker.]]
 
The only air force with its own dedicated fleet of 747 freighters was the [[Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force]] (IRIAF), formerly known as the [[Imperial Iranian Air Force]] (IIAF). In 1975, the IIAF acquired twelve passenger 747s, comprising nine ex-[[Trans World Airlines|TWA]] 747-131s and three ex-[[Continental Airlines]] 747-124s, for conversion into freighters.{{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=40-41, 78-80, 84}} All but one of the ex-TWA aircraft were converted,{{sfn|Minton|1991|pages=78-79, 84}} with three of them undergoing additional conversions into [[Aerial refueling|aerial refueling]] tankers, which were designated KC-747<ref name="Iran747destroyed"/> and based on specifications for Boeing's entry into the USAF's Advanced Cargo Transport Aircraft (ACTA) program for a new tanker aircraft that ultimately chose the [[McDonnell Douglas DC-10]] as the basis for the proposed tanker, later designated [[McDonnell Douglas KC-10|KC-10]].{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=372}}<ref name="HamiltonTanker"/> The only ex-TWA airframe not converted, registration serial N93119, was instead returned to TWA in 1976{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=84}} and continued its service as a passenger airliner for another 20 years until it crashed as [[TWA Flight 800]].{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=127}} The ex-Continental Airlines aircraft, of which only one was converted into a freighter, also did not last long in the IIAF inventory and were all back in service with civilian operators by 1978.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=80}} The IIAF later ordered five brand new 747-2J9Fs,{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=79}}{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=32}} of which only four were delivered between December 1977 and October 1978.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=95}} The fifth -200F, which was first flown on September 17, 1979, was not delivered to the IIAF due to political tensions between the US and Iran after the [[Islamic Revolution]] of 1979. It was instead kept by Boeing until its delivery as a civilian freighter for [[Northwest Airlines]] on September 15, 1983.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=32}}{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=97}} The rest of the 747s remained in the inventory of Iran's air force, by then renamed the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF), although some aircraft were transferred to [[Iran Air]].{{sfn|Shaw|1994|page=32}}{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=41}}
 
[[File:Boeing 747-100 of IRIAF taking off from Mehrabad with 2 on the ground.jpg|thumb|A Boeing 747-100 of the [[Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force]] (IRIAF) taking off in front of two other IRIAF 747s parked on the apron at [[Mehrabad International Airport]].]]
 
During their service, the Iranian 747s were primarily used to carry troops and cargo, as well as the [[Pahlavi dynasty|royal family]] prior to their overthrow. Their duties remained almost the same after Iran's change of administration.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=41}} While the nature of the IRIAF 747s' missions was not fully known outside of Iran during their early years in service,{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=40}} they were reported to have been deployed in conflicts such as the [[Iran–Iraq War]], most notably in the [[H-3 airstrike]] of 1981 where a KC-747 provided aerial refueling for [[McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II]] and [[Grumman F-14 Tomcat]] fighter aircraft while another 747 acted as an airborne command post.<ref name=MEMIM>{{Cite web |last=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=H3 airstrike |url=http://memim.com/h3-airstrike.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160129042258/http://memim.com/h3-airstrike.html |archive-date=January 29, 2016 |access-date=January 20, 2016 |website=MEMIM Encyclopedia}}</ref><ref name=BishopCooper2000>{{cite book|last1=Bishop|first1=Farzad|last2=Cooper|first2=Tom|title=Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988.|date=2000|publisher=Schiffer Pub.|location=Atglen|isbn=9780764316692|page=119}}</ref>
 
Eventually, the aircraft that remained operational in the 2020s were claimed to have been destroyed by the air forces of the US and Israel. The [[Israeli Air Force]] (IAF) claimed the destruction of the last KC-747 tanker during [[Twelve-Day War|Operation Rising Lion]] in June 2025,<ref name="Iran747destroyed"/> while US missile strikes in March 2026 reportedly destroyed the last operational IRIAF 747-100F, which also happened to be the last operational 747-100 in the world at the time.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Spray |first=Aaron |date=8 March 2026 |title=The world's last surviving Boeing 747-100 has been destroyed in Iran |url=https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/last-boeing-747-100-destroyed-in-iran/ |access-date=12 April 2026 |website=Aerospace Global News |language=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=13 March 2026 |title=Israeli Strikes Destroy World's Last Operational Boeing 747-100 in Tehran |url=https://www.sofx.com/israeli-strikes-destroy-worlds-last-operational-boeing-747-100-in-tehran/ |access-date=12 April 2026 |website=SOFX |language=}}</ref>
 
==== Other users ====
The [[Israeli Air Force]] (IAF) was also among the air forces that chartered 747s for transport and notably set a record in 1991, when 1,087 passengers were flown in an [[El Al]] 747-200C during [[Operation Solomon]], a covert operation to airlift Ethiopian Jews from [[Addis Ababa]] to [[Tel Aviv]]; two other El Al 747s were also deployed in the operation, carrying 920 passengers each.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=102}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 24, 2021 |title=El Al Israel Airlines' History. The 1990s. |url=https://www.elal.com/en/About-ELAL/About-ELAL/History/Pages/Decade-90.aspx |access-date=July 24, 2021 |publisher=El Al Israel Airlines |language=en}}</ref> The record set by the El Al 747-200C exceeded the maximum capacity of the 747-400, which typically carried between 416 and 524 passengers,<ref name="Angelucci">{{Cite book |last=Angelucci |first=Angelucci |title=World Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft |date=2001 |publisher=Chartwell Books |isbn=0-7858-1389-6 |location=Spain |page=403}}</ref> and also broke a record previously held on December 29, 1974, by a [[Qantas]] 747-238B, named ''[[Melbourne|City of Melbourne]]'', which carried 674 passengers, comprising 306 adults, 328 children, and 40 infants, from Darwin to Sydney following the devastation of [[Cyclone Tracy]].{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=102}}


International flights bypassing traditional hub airports and landing at smaller cities became more common throughout the 1980s, thus eroding the 747's original market.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20040211224743/http://www.boeing.com/news/speeches/2003/piasecki_030324.html "Turning Today's Challenges into Opportunities for Tomorrow"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.</ref> Many international carriers continued to use the 747 on [[Pacific Ocean|Pacific]] routes.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Aboulafia |first=Richard |date=March 1, 2004 |title=Commercial Transport Market Still in Rough Shape |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news/2004sb05.xml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112160220/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news%2F2004sb05.xml |archive-date=January 12, 2012 |access-date=December 10, 2007 |website=Aviation Week and Space Technology}}</ref> In Japan, 747s on domestic routes were configured to carry nearly the maximum passenger capacity.<ref>Wallace, James. [http://www.seattlepi.com/default/article/A380-buyer-keeps-mum-about-possible-luxuries-1164814.php "A380 buyer keeps mum about possible luxuries aboard cruise ship of the skies"]. ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', January 24, 2005. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.</ref>
Other air forces have used 747s for the transport of government officials and other VIPs.{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=44}}


== Variants ==
== Variants ==
Line 178: Line 274:
[[File:Boeing 747-121, Pan American World Airways - Pan Am AN1915191.jpg|thumb|The original 747-100 has a short upper deck with three windows per side; [[Pan Am]] introduced it on January 22, 1970]]
[[File:Boeing 747-121, Pan American World Airways - Pan Am AN1915191.jpg|thumb|The original 747-100 has a short upper deck with three windows per side; [[Pan Am]] introduced it on January 22, 1970]]


The first 747-100s were built with six upper deck windows (three per side) to accommodate upstairs lounge areas. Later, as airlines began to use the upper deck for premium passenger seating instead of lounge space, Boeing offered an upper deck with ten windows on either side as an option. Some early -100s were retrofitted with the new configuration.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210153158/http://www.aircraftspotting.net/aircraft/boeing_747.html#specs "Boeing 747"]. ''Aircraft Spotting''. Retrieved: December 7, 2007.</ref> The -100 was equipped with [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]]-3A engines. No freighter version of this model was developed, but many 747-100s were converted into freighters as 747-100(SF).<ref>[http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgEX.nsf/0/a590a0405960013a86256d4400727f45/$FILE/1870D.pdf "FAA Regulatory and Guidance Library (PDF)."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110155400/https://www.icao.int/publications/doc8643/pages/search.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Frgl.faa.gov%2FRegulatory_and_Guidance_Library%2FrgEX.nsf%2F0%2Fa590a0405960013a86256d4400727f45%2F%24FILE%2F1870D.pdf&type=replay&date=20150302150753 |date=January 10, 2018 }} ''FAA''. Retrieved: December 12, 2007. See reference to Supplementary Type Certificates for freighter conversion.</ref> The first 747-100(SF) was delivered to Flying Tiger Line in 1974.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cargoforwarder.eu/2019/02/03/still-in-love-with-a-50-year-old/|title=Still in Love With a 50 Year Old!|date=February 3, 2019|website=CargoForwarder Global|access-date=January 21, 2023|archive-date=January 21, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230121053317/https://www.cargoforwarder.eu/2019/02/03/still-in-love-with-a-50-year-old/|url-status=dead}}</ref> A total of 168 747-100s were built; 167 were delivered to customers, while Boeing kept the prototype, ''[[City of Everett (aircraft)|City of Everett]]''.<ref name="747_O_D_summ">[http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/displaystandardreport.cfm?cboCurrentModel=747&optReportType=AllModels&cboAllModel=747&ViewReportF=View+Report "747 Model Orders and Deliveries data."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928195003/http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/displaystandardreport.cfm?cboCurrentModel=747&optReportType=AllModels&cboAllModel=747&ViewReportF=View+Report |date=September 28, 2018}} ''The Boeing Company'', April 2021. Retrieved: October 24, 2020.</ref> In 1972, its unit cost was US$24M<ref name="Flight10Aug1972">{{Cite magazine |date=August 10, 1972 |title=Airliner price index |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1972/1972%20-%202020.html |magazine=Flight International |page=183}}</ref> ({{Inflation |US|24|r=1|1972}}M today).
The first 747-100s were built with six upper deck windows (three per side) to accommodate upstairs lounge areas. Later, as airlines began to use the upper deck for premium passenger seating instead of lounge space, Boeing offered an upper deck with ten windows on either side as an option, which was first applied on airframes built for [[United Airlines]].{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=320}} Some early -100s were retrofitted with the new configuration.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210153158/http://www.aircraftspotting.net/aircraft/boeing_747.html#specs "Boeing 747"]. ''Aircraft Spotting''. Retrieved: December 7, 2007.</ref> The -100 was equipped with [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]] engines and was compatible with the JT9D-1, -3, -3A, -3W, -7, and -7W variants.{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|page=76}} No freighter or combi versions of this model were developed, but many 747-100s were converted into freighters designated 747-100(SF), the first of which was delivered to [[Flying Tiger Line]] in 1974,<ref>[http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgEX.nsf/0/a590a0405960013a86256d4400727f45/$FILE/1870D.pdf "FAA Regulatory and Guidance Library (PDF)."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110155400/https://www.icao.int/publications/doc8643/pages/search.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Frgl.faa.gov%2FRegulatory_and_Guidance_Library%2FrgEX.nsf%2F0%2Fa590a0405960013a86256d4400727f45%2F%24FILE%2F1870D.pdf&type=replay&date=20150302150753 |date=January 10, 2018 }} ''FAA''. Retrieved: December 12, 2007. See reference to Supplementary Type Certificates for freighter conversion.</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cargoforwarder.eu/2019/02/03/still-in-love-with-a-50-year-old/|title=Still in Love With a 50 Year Old!|date=February 3, 2019|website=CargoForwarder Global|access-date=January 21, 2023|archive-date=January 21, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230121053317/https://www.cargoforwarder.eu/2019/02/03/still-in-love-with-a-50-year-old/|url-status=dead}}</ref> while [[Sabena]] converted their pair of 747-100s in April 1974{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=57}} with a combi configuration to carry both passengers and freight on the main deck in response to increased freight loads and minimal passenger demand on the airline's Brussels to New York route.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=214-215}}  A total of 168 747-100s were built; 167 were delivered to customers, while Boeing kept the prototype, ''[[City of Everett (aircraft)|City of Everett]]''.<ref name="747_O_D_summ">[http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/displaystandardreport.cfm?cboCurrentModel=747&optReportType=AllModels&cboAllModel=747&ViewReportF=View+Report "747 Model Orders and Deliveries data."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928195003/http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/displaystandardreport.cfm?cboCurrentModel=747&optReportType=AllModels&cboAllModel=747&ViewReportF=View+Report |date=September 28, 2018}} ''The Boeing Company'', April 2021. Retrieved: October 24, 2020.</ref> In 1972, its unit cost was {{USD|24 million}}<ref name="Flight10Aug1972">{{Cite magazine |date=August 10, 1972 |title=Airliner price index |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1972/1972%20-%202020.html |magazine=Flight International |page=183}}</ref> ({{Inflation |US|24|r=1|1972}} million today).


==== 747SR ====
==== 747SR ====
Line 184: Line 280:


[[File:JA8170 B747-146SR SUD JAL Japan Airlines HND 23MAY03 (8473400794).jpg|thumb|One of the two 747-100BSR with the stretched upper deck (SUD) made for [[Japan Airlines|JAL]]]]
[[File:JA8170 B747-146SR SUD JAL Japan Airlines HND 23MAY03 (8473400794).jpg|thumb|One of the two 747-100BSR with the stretched upper deck (SUD) made for [[Japan Airlines|JAL]]]]
The initial order for the -100SR – four aircraft for Japan Air Lines (JAL, later [[Japan Airlines]]) – was announced on October 30, 1972; rollout occurred on August 3, 1973, and the first flight took place on August 31, 1973. The type was certified by the FAA on September 26, 1973, with the first delivery on the same day. The -100SR entered service with JAL, the type's sole customer, on October 7, 1973, and typically operated flights within Japan.<ref name="B747_milest">[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_milestones.html "747 Milestones."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110524131419/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_milestones.html |date=May 24, 2011}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Seven -100SRs were built between 1973 and 1975, each with a {{convert|520000|lb|t|adj=on}} MTOW and [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]]-7A engines derated to {{convert|43000|lbf|kN}} of thrust.{{sfn|Bowers|1989|pages=516–517}}
The initial order for the -100SR – four aircraft for Japan Air Lines (JAL, later [[Japan Airlines]]) – was announced on October 30, 1972; rollout occurred on August 3, 1973, and the first flight took place on August 31, 1973. The type was certified by the FAA on September 26, 1973, with the first delivery on the same day. The -100SR entered service with JAL, the type's sole customer, on October 7, 1973, and typically operated flights within Japan.<ref name="B747_milest">[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_milestones.html "747 Milestones."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110524131419/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_milestones.html |date=May 24, 2011}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Seven -100SRs were built between 1973 and 1975, each with a {{convert|520000|lb|t|adj=on}} MTOW and [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]]-7A engines derated to {{convert|43000|lbf|kN}} of thrust.{{sfn|Bowers|1989|pages=516–517}}


Line 191: Line 288:


==== 747-100B ====
==== 747-100B ====
[[File:Iran Air Boeing 747-100 Lofting-1.jpg|thumb|An [[Iran Air]] {{not a typo|747-100B}}, the last {{not a typo|747-100}} in passenger service|alt=Top view of quadjet on apron]]
[[File:Iran Air Boeing 747-100 Lofting-1.jpg|thumb|EP-IAM, the sole {{not a typo|747-100B}} of [[Iran Air]] and the last {{not a typo|747-100}} in passenger service|alt=Top view of quadjet on apron]]


The 747-100B model was developed from the -100SR, using its stronger airframe and landing gear design. The type had an increased fuel capacity of {{convert|48070|USgal|L|abbr=on}}, allowing for a {{convert|5000|nmi|adj=on}} range with a typical 452-passenger payload, and an increased MTOW of {{convert|750000|lb|t|abbr=on}} was offered. The first -100B order, one aircraft for [[Iran Air]], was announced on June 1, 1978. This version first flew on June 20, 1979, received FAA certification on August 1, 1979, and was delivered the next day.<ref>Airclaims Jet program 1995</ref> Nine -100Bs were built, one for [[Iran Air]] and eight for [[Saudia|Saudi Arabian Airlines]].<ref>{{Cite news |last= |date=1981-03-31 |title=Saudia Orders 4 Boeing 747's |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/31/business/saudia-orders-4-boeing-747-s.html |access-date=2007-12-12 |work=The New York Times |issn=0362-4331 |agency=Reuters}}</ref>{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=52-53}} Unlike the original -100, the -100B was offered with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7A, CF6-50, or [[Rolls-Royce Holdings|Rolls-Royce]] [[Rolls-Royce RB211#RB211-524 series|RB211-524]] engines. However, only RB211-524 (Saudia) and JT9D-7A (Iran Air) engines were ordered.<ref name="Airclaims_p111">''Airclaims Jet Programs'' 1995, p. 111.</ref> The last 747-100B, EP-IAM was retired by Iran Air in 2014, the last commercial operator of the 747-100 and -100B.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 22, 2014 |title=The world's last 747-100 makes final flight with Iran Air |url=http://www.arabianaerospace.aero/the-world-s-last-747-100-makes-final-flight-with-iran-air.html |access-date=March 12, 2015 |website=Arabian Aerospace}}</ref>
The 747-100B model was developed from the -100SR,{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|page=76}} using its stronger airframe and landing gear design. The type had an increased fuel capacity of {{convert|48070|USgal|L|abbr=on}}, allowing for a {{convert|5000|nmi|adj=on}} range with a typical 452-passenger payload, and an increased MTOW of {{convert|750000|lb|t|abbr=on}} was offered. The first -100B order, one aircraft for [[Iran Air]], was announced on June 1, 1978. This version first flew on June 20, 1979, received FAA certification on August 1, 1979, and was delivered the next day.<ref>Airclaims Jet program 1995</ref> Nine -100Bs were built, one for [[Iran Air]] and eight for [[Saudia|Saudi Arabian Airlines]].<ref>{{Cite news |last= |date=1981-03-31 |title=Saudia Orders 4 Boeing 747's |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/31/business/saudia-orders-4-boeing-747-s.html |access-date=2007-12-12 |work=The New York Times |issn=0362-4331 |agency=Reuters}}</ref>{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=52-53}} Unlike the original -100, the -100B was offered with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7A, CF6-50, or [[Rolls-Royce Holdings|Rolls-Royce]] [[Rolls-Royce RB211#RB211-524 series|RB211-524]] engines. However, only RB211-524 (Saudia) and JT9D-7A (Iran Air) engines were ordered.<ref name="Airclaims_p111">''Airclaims Jet Programs'' 1995, p. 111.</ref> The last 747-100B, EP-IAM was retired by Iran Air in 2014, the last commercial operator of the 747-100 and -100B.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 22, 2014 |title=The world's last 747-100 makes final flight with Iran Air |url=http://www.arabianaerospace.aero/the-world-s-last-747-100-makes-final-flight-with-iran-air.html |access-date=March 12, 2015 |website=Arabian Aerospace}}</ref>


=== 747SP ===
=== 747SP ===
{{Main|Boeing 747SP}}
{{Main|Boeing 747SP}}
[[File:Air Namibia Boeing 747SP ZS-SPC FRA 1999-7-17.png|thumb|The 747SP was the only 747 model with a shortened fuselage|alt=Air Namibia 747SP on approach]]
[[File:Air Namibia Boeing 747SP ZS-SPC FRA 1999-7-17.png|thumb|The 747SP was the only 747 model with a shortened fuselage|alt=Air Namibia 747SP on approach]]


Line 204: Line 302:


=== 747-200 ===
=== 747-200 ===
[[File:Boeing 747-237B, Air-India AN0422476.jpg|thumb|An [[Air India]] Boeing 747-200B with ten windows in 2003. Most 747-200s had ten windows per side on the upper deck]]
{{Multiple images
| align            = right
| direction        = vertical
| width            = 250
| image1            = KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Boeing 747-206B PH-BUA at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport on 1 October 1972.jpg
| caption1          = Early 747-200s, like this example of launch customer [[KLM]] pictured in 1972, had three windows per side on the upper deck.
| image2            = Boeing_747-206B,_KLM_-_Royal_Dutch_Airlines_AN0678244.jpg
| caption2          = The same aircraft, pictured in 1988, retrofitted with the ten-window upper deck configuration that was standardized later in production. Boeing offered retrofits to apply the ten-window configuration on the upper decks of 747-100s and -200s with the older three-window layout.{{sfn|Serling|1992|pages=320-321}}
}}
 
While the 747-100 powered by Pratt & Whitney [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D-3A|JT9D-3A]] engines offered enough payload and range for medium-haul operations, it was marginal for long-haul route sectors. The demand for longer-range aircraft with increased payload quickly led to the improved -200, which featured more powerful engines, increased MTOW, and greater range than the -100. The 747-200 was produced in passenger (-200B), freighter (-200F), convertible (-200C), and combi (-200M) versions{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=60-61}} and was partly influenced by design inputs from the KSSU airline consortium comprising [[KLM]], [[Scandinavian Airlines]] (SAS), [[Swissair]], and [[Union de Transports Aériens]] (UTA).<ref name="KLM742"/>
 
Externally, the appearance of the 747-200 is identical to that of the earlier 747-100.{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|page=77}} A few -200s retained the early three-window configuration on the upper deck, but most were built with a ten-window configuration on each side starting with the 147th aircraft built, a 747-200B delivered to [[Qantas]].<ref>[http://www.plexoft.com/SBF/aviation/spot747.html "747 windows"]. ''Plexoft''. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.</ref>{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=54}} Retrofits were also offered to apply the ten-window upper deck configuration on early 747s with the three-window configuration.{{sfn|Serling|1992|pages=320-321}}


While the 747-100 powered by Pratt & Whitney [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D-3A|JT9D-3A]] engines offered enough payload and range for medium-haul operations, it was marginal for long-haul route sectors. The demand for longer range aircraft with increased payload quickly led to the improved -200, which featured more powerful engines, increased MTOW, and greater range than the -100. A few early -200s retained the three-window configuration of the -100 on the upper deck, but most were built with a ten-window configuration on each side.<ref>[http://www.plexoft.com/SBF/aviation/spot747.html "747 windows"]. ''Plexoft''. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.</ref> The 747-200 was produced in passenger (-200B), freighter (-200F), convertible (-200C), and combi (-200M) versions.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|pages=60-61}}
The 747-200B was the basic passenger version, with increased fuel capacity and more powerful engines. The prototype 747-200B, an airframe destined for [[Northwest Airlines]] (then known as Northwest Orient), was first flown on October 11, 1970, and received FAA certification three weeks before the first delivery was made on January 16, 1971, to launch customer KLM,{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=54}}{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=208}} which subsequently flew the type's first revenue service the following month on February 14 from Amsterdam to New York.<ref name=owner_guide /><ref name="KLM742"/> In its first three years of production, the -200 was equipped with [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]]-7 engines, initially the only engine available. The -200 was later made compatible with the JT9D-7J, -7Q, -7AW, -70A, and -7R4G2 variants throughout its production run.{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|page=76}} Range with a full passenger load started at over {{convert|5000|nmi|abbr=on}} and increased to {{convert|6000|nmi|abbr=on}} with later engines.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=43}} Extra fuel tanks were installed on two of the 747-200Bs delivered to [[Japan Airlines]] in the 1980s to increase the fuel capacity from {{convert|158.8|to|164.1|ST|MT|1}}, enabling them to be used on the airline's nonstop flights between Tokyo and New York.{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=44}} Most -200Bs had an internally stretched upper deck, allowing for up to 16 passenger seats.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=43}}  


The 747-200B was the basic passenger version, with increased fuel capacity and more powerful engines; it entered service in February 1971.<ref name=owner_guide /> In its first three years of production, the -200 was equipped with [[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]]-7 engines (initially the only engine available). Range with a full passenger load started at over {{convert|5000|nmi|abbr=on}} and increased to {{convert|6000|nmi|abbr=on}} with later engines. Most -200Bs had an internally stretched upper deck, allowing for up to 16 passenger seats.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=43}} The freighter model, the 747-200F, had a hinged nose cargo door and could be fitted with an optional side cargo door,<ref name=owner_guide /> and had a capacity of 105&nbsp;tons (95.3 tonnes) and an MTOW of up to {{Convert|833000|lb|t|abbr=out}}. It entered service in 1972 with Lufthansa.<ref>[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html "Boeing 747 – About the 747 Family."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060615032630/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |date=June 15, 2006}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.</ref> The convertible version, the 747-200C, could be converted between a passenger and a freighter or used in mixed configurations,<ref name=Boe_747_classics /> and featured removable seats and a nose cargo door.<ref name=owner_guide /> The -200C could also be outfitted with an optional side cargo door on the main deck.<ref>[http://www.civilaviation.eu/Boeing/747-200.htm "Boeing 747-200."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161026233832/http://civilaviation.eu/Boeing/747-200.htm |date=October 26, 2016}} ''CivilAviation.eu''. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.</ref>
The freighter model, the 747-200F, had a hinged nose cargo door and could be fitted with an optional side cargo door,<ref name=owner_guide /> and had a capacity of {{convert|105|ST|MT|0}} and an MTOW of up to {{Convert|833000|lb|t|abbr=out}}. The 747-200F was first flown on October 14, 1971, and entered service with Lufthansa in March 1972.<ref>[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html "Boeing 747 – About the 747 Family."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060615032630/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |date=June 15, 2006}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.</ref>{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=60}} The convertible version, the 747-200C, could be converted between a passenger and a freighter or used in mixed configurations,<ref name=Boe_747_classics /> and featured removable seats and a nose cargo door.<ref name=owner_guide /> The -200C could also be outfitted with an optional side cargo door on the main deck.<ref>[http://www.civilaviation.eu/Boeing/747-200.htm "Boeing 747-200."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161026233832/http://civilaviation.eu/Boeing/747-200.htm |date=October 26, 2016}} ''CivilAviation.eu''. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.</ref> The first -200C rolled out of Boeing's Everett factory on February 28, 1973, and made its maiden flight a month later before its delivery to launch customer [[World Airways]] on April 27.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=61}} The 747-200C's unique feature proved to be beneficial for its operators in maintaining profitable 747 operations through switching between configurations depending on the flow of passenger and freight traffic on their networks. For instance, [[Martinair]] flew their 747-200Cs in the 1980s and 1990s as passenger aircraft in the summer and as freighters in the winter.{{sfn|Shaw|1994|pages=48-49}}


The [[combi aircraft]] model, the 747-200M (originally designated 747-200BC), could carry freight in the rear section of the main deck via a side cargo door. A removable partition on the main deck separated the cargo area at the rear from the passengers at the front. The -200M could carry up to 238 passengers in a three-class configuration with cargo carried on the main deck. The model was also known as the 747-200 Combi.<ref name=owner_guide /> As on the -100, a stretched upper deck (SUD) modification was later offered. A total of ten 747-200s operated by [[KLM]] were converted.<ref name=owner_guide />
The [[combi aircraft]] model, the 747-200M (originally designated 747-200BC), was based on a configuration first applied in 1974 as a conversion for [[Sabena]]'s 747-100 fleet{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=57}}{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=214-215}} and could carry freight in the rear section of the main deck via a side cargo door. A removable partition on the main deck separated the cargo area at the rear from the passengers at the front. The -200M could carry up to 238 passengers in a three-class configuration with cargo carried on the main deck. The model was also known as the 747-200 Combi.<ref name=owner_guide /> The first -200M made its maiden flight on November 18, 1974, and was delivered to Air Canada on March 7, 1975.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=61}} As on the -100, a stretched upper deck (SUD) modification was later offered in the 1980s. Between September 1984 and March 1986, all ten of the CF6-powered 747-200s in KLM's fleet were converted with a process that involved removing half of the upper fuselage up to the leading edge of the wing, where the new SUD section would be installed.<ref name=owner_guide />{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=63}} Two -200 airframes operated by UTA were also modified with the SUD conversion.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=63}}


After launching the -200 with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 engines, on August 1, 1972, Boeing announced that it had reached an agreement with General Electric to certify the 747 with [[General_Electric_CF6|CF6-50]] series engines to increase the aircraft's market potential. Rolls-Royce followed 747 engine production with a launch order from [[British Airways]] for four aircraft. The option of [[Rolls-Royce_RB211|RB211-524B]] engines was announced on June 17, 1975.<ref name=Airclaims_p111 /> The -200 was the first 747 to provide a choice of powerplant from the three major engine manufacturers.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|pages=46, 50–53}}
The -200 was the first 747 to provide a choice of powerplant from the three major engine manufacturers, namely Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce.{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|pages=46, 50–53}} After launching the -200 with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 engines on August 1, 1972, Boeing announced that it had reached an agreement with General Electric to certify the 747 with [[General_Electric_CF6|CF6-50]] series engines to increase the aircraft's market potential. The CF6-50 was initially tested on the prototype 747 before the first CF6-powered production airframe, a 747-200M, was delivered to KLM in October 1975.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=56}} The 747-200 was compatible with the CF6-50D and CF6-50E variants.{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|page=76}} Rolls-Royce followed 747 engine production with the announcement of the [[Rolls-Royce_RB211|RB211-524B]] engine as an option for the 747 on June 17, 1975, and a launch order from [[British Airways]] for four aircraft,<ref name=Airclaims_p111 /> the first of which was delivered to the airline on June 16, 1977.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=56}} Installation of the RB211 on the 747 had been proposed early in the aircraft's development, around 1967 or 1968, to satisfy the demands of [[British Overseas Airways Corporation|BOAC]] (later merged to form British Airways) for their aircraft to be powered by British-designed engines, but this was not fulfilled until the experimental ''Hyfil'' [[Carbon fibers|carbon fiber]] material, which was planned for use in the fan blade assembly, failed a critical test and was discarded in favor of convenetional all-metal materials.{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=208-210}} The first RB211-powered 747-200 made its maiden flight on September 3, 1976, and received FAA certification in May 1977.{{sfn|Norris|Wagner|1997|page=56}} Specific variants of the RB211 that were compatible with the 747-200 included the RB211-524B2 and -524C2.{{sfn|Green|Swanborough|Mowinski|1987|page=76}}
In 1976, its unit cost was US$39M ({{Inflation|US|39|r=1|1976}}M today).


A total of 393 of the 747-200 versions had been built when production ended in 1991.<ref name="747b">[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html "747 background."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060615032630/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |date=June 15, 2006}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> Of these, 225 were -200B, 73 were -200F, 13 were -200C, 78 were -200M, and 4 were military.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210173616/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classics.html "747 Classics Technical Specifications"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.</ref> Iran Air retired the last passenger {{not a typo|747-200}} in May 2016, 36 years after it was delivered.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news/46137-iran-air-retires-last-remaining-pax-b747-200|title=Iran Air retires last remaining pax B747-200|website=ch-aviation}}</ref> {{as of|2019|July|}}, five 747-200s remain in service as freighters.<ref name="fi30719p39">Thisdell and Seymour ''Flight International'' July 30 – August 5, 2019, p. 39.</ref>
In 1976, its unit cost was US$39M ({{Inflation|US|39|r=1|1976}}M today).{{Citation needed|date=May 2026}} A total of 393 of the 747-200 versions had been built when production ended in 1991.<ref name="747b">[http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html "747 background."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060615032630/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/background.html |date=June 15, 2006}} ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.</ref> Of these, 225 were -200B, 73 were -200F, 13 were -200C, 78 were -200M, and 4 were military.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210173616/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classics.html "747 Classics Technical Specifications"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.</ref> Iran Air retired the last passenger {{not a typo|747-200}} in May 2016, 36 years after it was delivered.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news/46137-iran-air-retires-last-remaining-pax-b747-200|title=Iran Air retires last remaining pax B747-200|website=ch-aviation}}</ref> {{as of|2019|July|}}, five 747-200s remain in service as freighters.<ref name="fi30719p39">Thisdell and Seymour ''Flight International'' July 30 – August 5, 2019, p. 39.</ref>


=== 747-300 ===
=== 747-300 ===
Line 226: Line 335:
Swissair placed the first order for the {{not a typo|747-300}} on June 11, 1980.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Seven Series |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100328074016/http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |archive-date=March 28, 2010 |access-date=December 15, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> The variant revived the 747-300 designation, which had been previously used on a design study that did not reach production. The 747-300 first flew on October 5, 1982, and the type's first delivery went to Swissair on March 23, 1983.<ref name=B747_milest /> In 1982, its unit cost was US$83M ({{Inflation |US|83|r=1|1982}}M today). Besides the passenger model, two other versions (-300M, -300SR) were produced. The 747-300M features cargo capacity on the rear portion of the main deck, similar to the -200M, but with the stretched upper deck it can carry more passengers.<ref name=plan />{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=97}} The 747-300SR, a short range, high-capacity domestic model, was produced for Japanese markets with a maximum seating for 584.<ref name="747class_report">[http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_123sp.pdf "Boeing 747-100/-200/-300/-SP airport report."] (pdf) ''The Boeing Company'', May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.</ref> No production freighter version of the 747-300 was built, but Boeing began modifications of used passenger -300 models into freighters in 2000.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing Delivers First 747-300 Special Freighter To Atlas Air |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/photorelease/photo_release_001017b.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001027192806/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/photorelease/photo_release_001017b.html |archive-date=October 27, 2000 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref>
Swissair placed the first order for the {{not a typo|747-300}} on June 11, 1980.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Seven Series |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100328074016/http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |archive-date=March 28, 2010 |access-date=December 15, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> The variant revived the 747-300 designation, which had been previously used on a design study that did not reach production. The 747-300 first flew on October 5, 1982, and the type's first delivery went to Swissair on March 23, 1983.<ref name=B747_milest /> In 1982, its unit cost was US$83M ({{Inflation |US|83|r=1|1982}}M today). Besides the passenger model, two other versions (-300M, -300SR) were produced. The 747-300M features cargo capacity on the rear portion of the main deck, similar to the -200M, but with the stretched upper deck it can carry more passengers.<ref name=plan />{{sfn|Jenkins|2000|page=97}} The 747-300SR, a short range, high-capacity domestic model, was produced for Japanese markets with a maximum seating for 584.<ref name="747class_report">[http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_123sp.pdf "Boeing 747-100/-200/-300/-SP airport report."] (pdf) ''The Boeing Company'', May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.</ref> No production freighter version of the 747-300 was built, but Boeing began modifications of used passenger -300 models into freighters in 2000.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing Delivers First 747-300 Special Freighter To Atlas Air |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/photorelease/photo_release_001017b.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001027192806/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/photorelease/photo_release_001017b.html |archive-date=October 27, 2000 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref>


A total of 81 {{not a typo|747-300}} series aircraft were delivered, 56 for passenger use, 21 -300M and 4 -300SR versions.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210173616/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classics.html "Technical Specifications – 747 Classics"], ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: July 11, 2008</ref> In 1985, just two years after the -300 entered service, the type was superseded by the announcement of the more advanced 747-400.<ref>Lawrence and Thornton 2005</ref> The last 747-300 was delivered in September 1990 to [[Sabena]].<ref name=Boe_747_classics /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Seven series |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100328074016/http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |archive-date=March 28, 2010 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> While some -300 customers continued operating the type, several large carriers replaced their 747-300s with 747-400s. [[Air France]], [[Air India]], [[Japan Airlines]], [[Pakistan International Airlines]], and [[Qantas]] were some of the last major carriers to operate the {{not a typo|747-300}}. On December 29, 2008, Qantas flew its last scheduled 747-300 service, operating from Melbourne to Los Angeles via [[Auckland Airport|Auckland]].<ref name="B743">[http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/qantass-final-boeing-747300-heads-for-graveyard-20090120-7lfi.html "Qantas's final Boeing 747-300 heads for graveyard."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907034434/http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/qantass-final-boeing-747300-heads-for-graveyard-20090120-7lfi.html |date=September 7, 2017}} ''[[The Age]]''. Retrieved: January 21, 2009.</ref> In July 2015, Pakistan International Airlines retired their final 747-300 after 30 years of service.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Drum |first=Bruce |date=June 29, 2015 |title=PIA to retire its last Boeing 747 "within a month" |url=https://worldairlinenews.com/2015/06/29/pia-to-retire-its-last-boeing-747-within-a-month/ |access-date=July 17, 2016 |website=World Airline News |archive-date=August 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821211448/https://worldairlinenews.com/2015/06/29/pia-to-retire-its-last-boeing-747-within-a-month/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Mahan Air]] was the last passenger operator of the Boeing 747-300. In 2022, their last 747-300M was leased by [[Emtrasur Cargo]]. The 747-300M was later seized by the [[United States Department of Justice|US Department of Justice]]<!-- and scrapped (NOTE: This will be added once a reliable source is found for this claim)--> in 2024.<ref>{{cite news |last=Arshad |first=Minnah |date=12 February 2024 |title=U.S. seizes Boeing 747 cargo plane that Iranian airline sold to Venezuelan company |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/12/seize-boeing-747-cargo-aircraft-iranian-airline/72578543007/ |work=[[USA Today]] |location= |publisher= |access-date=13 April 2025}}</ref>
A total of 81 {{not a typo|747-300}} series aircraft were delivered, 56 for passenger use, 21 -300M and 4 -300SR versions.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071210173616/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_classics.html "Technical Specifications – 747 Classics"], ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: July 11, 2008</ref> In 1985, just two years after the -300 entered service, the type was superseded by the announcement of the more advanced 747-400.<ref>Lawrence and Thornton 2005</ref> The last 747-300 was delivered in September 1990 to [[Sabena]].<ref name=Boe_747_classics /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Seven series |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100328074016/http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/sevenseries/747.html |archive-date=March 28, 2010 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |publisher=The Boeing Company}}</ref> While some -300 customers continued operating the type, several large carriers replaced their 747-300s with 747-400s. [[Air France]], [[Air India]], [[Japan Airlines]], [[Pakistan International Airlines]], and [[Qantas]] were some of the last major carriers to operate the {{not a typo|747-300}}. On December 29, 2008, Qantas flew its last scheduled 747-300 service, operating from Melbourne to Los Angeles via [[Auckland Airport|Auckland]].<ref name="B743">[http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/qantass-final-boeing-747300-heads-for-graveyard-20090120-7lfi.html "Qantas's final Boeing 747-300 heads for graveyard."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907034434/http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/qantass-final-boeing-747300-heads-for-graveyard-20090120-7lfi.html |date=September 7, 2017}} ''[[The Age]]''. Retrieved: January 21, 2009.</ref> In July 2015, Pakistan International Airlines retired their final 747-300 after 30 years of service.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Drum |first=Bruce |date=June 29, 2015 |title=PIA to retire its last Boeing 747 "within a month" |url=https://worldairlinenews.com/2015/06/29/pia-to-retire-its-last-boeing-747-within-a-month/ |access-date=July 17, 2016 |website=World Airline News |archive-date=August 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821211448/https://worldairlinenews.com/2015/06/29/pia-to-retire-its-last-boeing-747-within-a-month/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Mahan Air]] was the last passenger operator of the 747-300. In 2022, one of their 747-300Ms was leased by [[Emtrasur Cargo]]. The 747-300M was later seized by the [[United States Department of Justice|US Department of Justice]]<!-- and scrapped (NOTE: This will be added once a reliable source is found for this claim)--> in 2024.<ref>{{cite news |last=Arshad |first=Minnah |date=12 February 2024 |title=U.S. seizes Boeing 747 cargo plane that Iranian airline sold to Venezuelan company |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/12/seize-boeing-747-cargo-aircraft-iranian-airline/72578543007/ |work=[[USA Today]] |location= |publisher= |access-date=13 April 2025}}</ref>


=== 747-400 ===
=== 747-400 ===
Line 236: Line 345:
The {{nowrap|-400}} was offered in passenger (-400), freighter (-400F), combi (-400M), domestic (-400D), extended range passenger (-400ER), and extended range freighter (-400ERF) versions. Passenger versions retain the same upper deck as the {{nowrap|-300}}, while the freighter version does not have an extended upper deck.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071219214312/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_400f_back.html "Boeing 747-400 Freighter Family"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> The 747-400D was designed for short-range operations with maximum seating for 624. So winglets were not included though they can be retrofitted.<ref name="747-400_report">[http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_4.pdf "Boeing 747-400/-400ER airport report."] (pdf) ''The Boeing Company'', May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.</ref><ref>[http://www.jal.com/en/press/1998/111901/111901.html "Japan Airlines To Receive 100th Boeing 747 Aircraft"]. ''Japan Airlines'', November 19, 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Cruising speed is up to Mach 0.855 on different versions of the {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref name=specs />
The {{nowrap|-400}} was offered in passenger (-400), freighter (-400F), combi (-400M), domestic (-400D), extended range passenger (-400ER), and extended range freighter (-400ERF) versions. Passenger versions retain the same upper deck as the {{nowrap|-300}}, while the freighter version does not have an extended upper deck.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071219214312/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/pf/pf_400f_back.html "Boeing 747-400 Freighter Family"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> The 747-400D was designed for short-range operations with maximum seating for 624. So winglets were not included though they can be retrofitted.<ref name="747-400_report">[http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_4.pdf "Boeing 747-400/-400ER airport report."] (pdf) ''The Boeing Company'', May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.</ref><ref>[http://www.jal.com/en/press/1998/111901/111901.html "Japan Airlines To Receive 100th Boeing 747 Aircraft"]. ''Japan Airlines'', November 19, 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> Cruising speed is up to Mach 0.855 on different versions of the {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref name=specs />


The passenger version first entered service in February 1989 with launch customer Northwest Airlines on the Minneapolis to Phoenix route.<ref name="AW090820">{{Cite news |date=August 20, 2009 |title=Queen of its time |work=[[Airliner World]] |url=http://www.airlinerworld.com/2009/08/queen-of-its-time/ |access-date=August 6, 2016 |archive-date=August 22, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160822233913/http://www.airlinerworld.com/2009/08/queen-of-its-time/ |url-status=dead}}</ref> The combi version entered service in September 1989 with KLM, while the freighter version entered service in November 1993 with Cargolux. The 747-400ERF entered service with Air France in October 2002, while the 747-400ER entered service with Qantas,<ref name="Boeing_747-400ER">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071012042115/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/lr_back/index.html "Boeing 747-400ER Family"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: October 16, 2007.</ref> its sole customer, in November 2002. In January 2004, Boeing and [[Cathay Pacific]] launched the Boeing 747-400 Special Freighter program,<ref name="747-400SF">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2004-01-07-Boeing-and-Cathay-Pacific-Airways-Launch-747-400-Special-Freighter "Boeing and Cathay Pacific Airways Launch 747-400 Special Freighter"]. ''The Boeing Company'', January 7, 2004. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.</ref> later referred to as the Boeing Converted Freighter (BCF), to modify passenger 747-400s for cargo use. The first 747-400BCF was redelivered in December 2005.<ref name="First_747-400_BCF">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2005-12-19-First-747-400-Boeing-Converted-Freighter-Redelivered-to-Cathay-Pacific "First 747-400 Boeing Converted Freighter Redelivered to Cathay Pacific"]. ''The Boeing Company'', December 19, 2005. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.</ref>
The passenger version first entered service in February 1989 with launch customer Northwest Airlines on the Minneapolis to Phoenix route.<ref name="AW090820">{{Cite news |date=August 20, 2009 |title=Queen of its time |work=[[Airliner World]] |url=http://www.airlinerworld.com/2009/08/queen-of-its-time/ |access-date=August 6, 2016 |archive-date=August 22, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160822233913/http://www.airlinerworld.com/2009/08/queen-of-its-time/ |url-status=dead}}</ref> The combi version entered service in September 1989 with KLM, while the freighter version entered service in November 1993 with Cargolux. The 747-400ERF entered service with Air France in October 2002, while the 747-400ER entered service with Qantas,<ref name="Boeing_747-400ER">[https://web.archive.org/web/20071012042115/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/lr_back/index.html "Boeing 747-400ER Family"]. ''The Boeing Company''. Retrieved: October 16, 2007.</ref> its sole customer, in November 2002. In January 2004, Boeing and [[Cathay Pacific]] launched the 747-400 Special Freighter program,<ref name="747-400SF">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2004-01-07-Boeing-and-Cathay-Pacific-Airways-Launch-747-400-Special-Freighter "Boeing and Cathay Pacific Airways Launch 747-400 Special Freighter"]. ''The Boeing Company'', January 7, 2004. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.</ref> later referred to as the Boeing Converted Freighter (BCF), to modify passenger 747-400s for cargo use. The first 747-400BCF was redelivered in December 2005.<ref name="First_747-400_BCF">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2005-12-19-First-747-400-Boeing-Converted-Freighter-Redelivered-to-Cathay-Pacific "First 747-400 Boeing Converted Freighter Redelivered to Cathay Pacific"]. ''The Boeing Company'', December 19, 2005. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.</ref>


In March 2007, Boeing announced that it had no plans to produce further passenger versions of the -400.<ref name="747passend">Wallace, James. [http://www.seattlepi.com/default/article/747-400-passenger-jet-is-no-more-1231302.php "747-400 passenger is no more"]. ''Seattlepi.com'', March 17, 2007. Retrieved June 7, 2011.</ref> However, orders for 36 -400F and -400ERF freighters were already in place at the time of the announcement.<ref name=747passend /> The last passenger version of the 747-400 was delivered in April 2005 to China Airlines. Some of the last built 747-400s were delivered with Dreamliner livery along with the modern Signature interior from the [[Boeing 777]]. A total of 694 of the {{not a typo|747-400}} series aircraft were delivered.<ref name=747_O_D_summ /> At various times, the largest 747-400 operator has included [[Singapore Airlines]],<ref name="Boeing_1995">[https://web.archive.org/web/19990209120436/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1995/news.release.951013-a.html "Singapore Airlines Boeing 747-400 Fleet World's Largest"]. ''The Boeing Company'', October 13, 1994. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.</ref> Japan Airlines,<ref name=Boeing_1995 /> and British Airways.<ref>[http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2005/august/i_iw2.html "British Airways set for fleet revamp"]. ''The Boeing Company'', August 2005. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=British Airways Boeing 747-400 |url=http://www.britishairways.com/travel/boeing-747-400/public/en_gb |access-date=January 21, 2017 |website=BritishAirways.com}}</ref> {{as of|2019|July}}, 331 Boeing 747-400s were in service;<ref name="fi30719p39" /> there were only 10 Boeing 747-400s in passenger service as of September 2021.
In March 2007, Boeing announced that it had no plans to produce further passenger versions of the -400.<ref name="747passend">Wallace, James. [http://www.seattlepi.com/default/article/747-400-passenger-jet-is-no-more-1231302.php "747-400 passenger is no more"]. ''Seattlepi.com'', March 17, 2007. Retrieved June 7, 2011.</ref> However, orders for 36 -400F and -400ERF freighters were already in place at the time of the announcement.<ref name=747passend /> The last passenger version of the 747-400 was delivered in April 2005 to China Airlines. Some of the last built 747-400s were delivered with Dreamliner livery along with the modern Signature interior from the [[Boeing 777]]. A total of 694 of the {{not a typo|747-400}} series aircraft were delivered.<ref name=747_O_D_summ /> At various times, the largest 747-400 operator has included [[Singapore Airlines]],<ref name="Boeing_1995">[https://web.archive.org/web/19990209120436/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1995/news.release.951013-a.html "Singapore Airlines Boeing 747-400 Fleet World's Largest"]. ''The Boeing Company'', October 13, 1994. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.</ref> Japan Airlines,<ref name=Boeing_1995 /> and British Airways.<ref>[http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2005/august/i_iw2.html "British Airways set for fleet revamp"]. ''The Boeing Company'', August 2005. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=British Airways Boeing 747-400 |url=http://www.britishairways.com/travel/boeing-747-400/public/en_gb |access-date=January 21, 2017 |website=BritishAirways.com}}</ref> {{as of|2019|July}}, 331 Boeing 747-400s were in service;<ref name="fi30719p39" /> there were only 10 Boeing 747-400s in passenger service as of September 2021.
Line 248: Line 357:
=== 747-8 ===
=== 747-8 ===
{{Main|Boeing 747-8}}
{{Main|Boeing 747-8}}
[[File:Boeing 747-8 first flight Everett, WA.jpg|thumb|The stretched and re-engined [[Boeing 747-8]] made its maiden flight on February 8, 2010, as a freighter|alt=Side view of quadjet over clouds]]
[[File:Boeing 747-8 first flight Everett, WA.jpg|thumb|The stretched and re-engined [[Boeing 747-8|747-8]] made its maiden flight on February 8, 2010, as a freighter|alt=Side view of quadjet over clouds]]


Boeing announced a new 747 variant, the {{not a typo|747-8}}, on November 14, 2005. Referred to as the ''747 Advanced'' prior to its launch, Boeing selected the designation 747-8 to show the connection with the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner]], as the aircraft would use technology and the [[General Electric GEnx]] engines from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kingsley-Jones |first=Max |date=13 November 2012 |title=IN FOCUS: Boeing 747-8 technical description & cutaway |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/in-focus-boeing-747-8-technical-description-and-cutaway/107801.article |access-date=2025-01-10 |website=Flight Global |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=747-8 Over Mt. Rainier |url=https://secure.boeingimages.com/archive/747-8-Over-Mt--Rainier-2F3XC5KLE2I.html |access-date=January 10, 2024 |website=Boeing |quote=By working together with customers and applying the innovative new technologies of the 787 Dreamliner, Boeing was able to create the 747-8 family. In fact, the designation 747-8 was chosen to show the technology connection between the 787 and the new 747.}}</ref><ref name="B747_35th_Anniv2">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2004-02-09-Boeing-747-the-Queen-of-the-Skies-Celebrates-35th-Anniversary "Boeing 747, the 'Queen of the Skies,' Celebrates 35th Anniversary"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009034309/http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2004-02-09-Boeing-747-the-Queen-of-the-Skies-Celebrates-35th-Anniversary|date=October 9, 2017}}. Boeing, February 9, 2004.</ref> The variant is designed to be quieter, more economical, and more environmentally friendly. The 747-8's fuselage is lengthened from {{Convert|232|ft|m|abbr=out}} to {{Convert|251|ft|m|abbr=out}},<ref>Steinke, Sebastian. [https://web.archive.org/web/20090410042129/http://flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRHeft06/FRH0601/FR0601f.htm "Boeing launches 747-8"]. ''Flug Revue'', January 2006. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.</ref> marking the first stretch variant of the aircraft.
Boeing announced a new 747 variant, the {{not a typo|747-8}}, on November 14, 2005. Referred to as the ''747 Advanced'' prior to its launch, Boeing selected the designation 747-8 to show the connection with the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner]], as the aircraft would use technology and the [[General Electric GEnx]] engines from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kingsley-Jones |first=Max |date=13 November 2012 |title=IN FOCUS: Boeing 747-8 technical description & cutaway |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/in-focus-boeing-747-8-technical-description-and-cutaway/107801.article |access-date=2025-01-10 |website=Flight Global |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=747-8 Over Mt. Rainier |url=https://secure.boeingimages.com/archive/747-8-Over-Mt--Rainier-2F3XC5KLE2I.html |access-date=January 10, 2024 |website=Boeing |quote=By working together with customers and applying the innovative new technologies of the 787 Dreamliner, Boeing was able to create the 747-8 family. In fact, the designation 747-8 was chosen to show the technology connection between the 787 and the new 747.}}</ref><ref name="B747_35th_Anniv2">[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2004-02-09-Boeing-747-the-Queen-of-the-Skies-Celebrates-35th-Anniversary "Boeing 747, the 'Queen of the Skies,' Celebrates 35th Anniversary"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009034309/http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2004-02-09-Boeing-747-the-Queen-of-the-Skies-Celebrates-35th-Anniversary|date=October 9, 2017}}. Boeing, February 9, 2004.</ref> The variant is designed to be quieter, more economical, and more environmentally friendly. The 747-8's fuselage is lengthened from {{Convert|232|ft|m|abbr=out}} to {{Convert|251|ft|m|abbr=out}},<ref>Steinke, Sebastian. [https://web.archive.org/web/20090410042129/http://flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRHeft06/FRH0601/FR0601f.htm "Boeing launches 747-8"]. ''Flug Revue'', January 2006. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.</ref> marking the first stretch variant of the aircraft.
[[File:Lufthansa Boeing 747-830 D-ABYT "Retro" (29988018323).jpg|thumb|A 747-8I, the passenger variant of the -8 series, of launch customer Lufthansa. This example is painted with a retro livery modeled after the livery worn by Lufthansa's 747 fleet from the 1970s to 1980s.]]


The 747-8 Freighter, or 747-8F, has 16% more payload capacity than its predecessor, allowing it to carry seven more standard air cargo containers, with a maximum payload capacity of {{cvt|154|ST|t|0|lk=on}} of cargo.<ref>[http://www.deagel.com/Freighters/Boeing-747-8F_a000202006.aspx "Boeing 747-8 Freighter"]. ''Deagel''. Retrieved: December 8, 2007.</ref> As on previous 747 freighters, the 747-8F features a flip up nose-door, a side-door on the main deck, and a side-door on the lower deck ("belly") to aid loading and unloading. The 747-8F made its maiden flight on February 8, 2010.<ref>[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1068 "Boeing 747-8 Freighter Successfully Completes First Flight"]. The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 15, 2011</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20100212112245/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/02/08/338138/pictures.html "Pictures & Video: Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight"]. ''Flight International,'' February 8, 2010. Retrieved: February 9, 2010.</ref> The variant received its amended [[type certificate]] jointly from the FAA and the [[European Aviation Safety Agency]] (EASA) on August 19, 2011.<ref>Ostrower, Jon. [https://web.archive.org/web/20121105192227/http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/747-8f-and-787-delivery-dates-come-into-focus-361185/ "747-8F and 787 delivery dates come into focus"]. Air Transport Intelligence news via Flightglobal.com, August 24, 2011.</ref> The -8F was first delivered to Cargolux on October 12, 2011.<ref>Ostrower, Jon. [http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/picture-boeing-delivers-first-747-8f-363348/ "Boeing delivers first 747-8F"]. Flightglobal.com, October 12, 2011.</ref>
The 747-8 Freighter, or 747-8F, has 16% more payload capacity than its predecessor, allowing it to carry seven more standard air cargo containers, with a maximum payload capacity of {{cvt|154|ST|t|0|lk=on}} of cargo.<ref>[http://www.deagel.com/Freighters/Boeing-747-8F_a000202006.aspx "Boeing 747-8 Freighter"]. ''Deagel''. Retrieved: December 8, 2007.</ref> As on previous 747 freighters, the 747-8F features a flip up nose-door, a side-door on the main deck, and a side-door on the lower deck ("belly") to aid loading and unloading. The 747-8F made its maiden flight on February 8, 2010.<ref>[http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1068 "Boeing 747-8 Freighter Successfully Completes First Flight"]. The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 15, 2011</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20100212112245/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/02/08/338138/pictures.html "Pictures & Video: Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight"]. ''Flight International,'' February 8, 2010. Retrieved: February 9, 2010.</ref> The variant received its amended [[type certificate]] jointly from the FAA and the [[European Aviation Safety Agency]] (EASA) on August 19, 2011.<ref>Ostrower, Jon. [https://web.archive.org/web/20121105192227/http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/747-8f-and-787-delivery-dates-come-into-focus-361185/ "747-8F and 787 delivery dates come into focus"]. Air Transport Intelligence news via Flightglobal.com, August 24, 2011.</ref> The -8F was first delivered to Cargolux on October 12, 2011.<ref>Ostrower, Jon. [http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/picture-boeing-delivers-first-747-8f-363348/ "Boeing delivers first 747-8F"]. Flightglobal.com, October 12, 2011.</ref>
Line 260: Line 371:
[[File:Boeing 747 AAC cutaway.png|thumb|747 "airborne aircraft carrier" concept |alt=Silhouette diagram of 747 airborne aircraft carrier aircraft]]
[[File:Boeing 747 AAC cutaway.png|thumb|747 "airborne aircraft carrier" concept |alt=Silhouette diagram of 747 airborne aircraft carrier aircraft]]
[[File:Atlantis on Shuttle Carrier Aircraft.jpg|thumb|right|[[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]] carrying a [[Space Shuttle orbiter]]]]
[[File:Atlantis on Shuttle Carrier Aircraft.jpg|thumb|right|[[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]] carrying a [[Space Shuttle orbiter]]]]
[[File:American Boeing 747 Refuels an Iranian Boeing 747.jpg|thumb|[[Imperial Iranian Air Force]] (IIAF) KC-747 tanker refueling a standard IIAF 747-100F. The KC-747 is still wearing the livery of its former operator, [[Trans World Airlines|TWA]].]]


* '''[[Boeing VC-25|VC-25]]''' – This aircraft is the U.S. Air Force [[very important person]] (VIP) version of the 747-200B. The U.S. Air Force operates two of them in [[Very Important Person|VIP]] configuration as the VC-25A. Tail numbers 28000 and 29000 are popularly known as ''[[Air Force One]]'', which is technically the air-traffic call sign for any [[United States Air Force]] aircraft carrying the U.S. president.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 1, 2003 |title=Factsheets: VC-25 – Air Force One |work=Air Force |url=https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104588/vc-25-air-force-one/ |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=U.S. Air Force}}</ref> Partially completed aircraft from Everett, Washington, were flown to [[Wichita, Kansas|Wichita]], Kansas, for final outfitting by [[Boeing Military Airplane Company]].<ref>Taylor 1988, pp. 370–371.</ref> Two new aircraft, based around the {{not a typo|747-8}}, are being procured which will be designated as VC-25B.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Macias |first1=Amanda |last2=Breuninger |first2=Kevin |date=February 27, 2018 |title=The White House cuts $3.9&nbsp;billion deal with Boeing for two new Air Force Ones |work=CNBC |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/27/the-white-house-has-cut-a-deal-with-boeing-for-two-new-air-force-ones-nbc-news.html |access-date=November 30, 2020}}</ref>
* '''[[Boeing VC-25|VC-25]]''' – This aircraft is the U.S. Air Force [[very important person]] (VIP) version of the 747-200B. The U.S. Air Force operates two of them in [[Very Important Person|VIP]] configuration as the VC-25A. Tail numbers 28000 and 29000 are popularly known as ''[[Air Force One]]'', which is technically the air-traffic call sign for any [[United States Air Force]] aircraft carrying the U.S. president.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 1, 2003 |title=Factsheets: VC-25 – Air Force One |work=Air Force |url=https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104588/vc-25-air-force-one/ |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=U.S. Air Force}}</ref> Partially completed aircraft from Everett, Washington, were flown to [[Wichita, Kansas|Wichita]], Kansas, for final outfitting by [[Boeing Military Airplane Company]].<ref>Taylor 1988, pp. 370–371.</ref> Two new aircraft, based around the {{not a typo|747-8}}, are being procured which will be designated as VC-25B.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Macias |first1=Amanda |last2=Breuninger |first2=Kevin |date=February 27, 2018 |title=The White House cuts $3.9&nbsp;billion deal with Boeing for two new Air Force Ones |work=CNBC |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/27/the-white-house-has-cut-a-deal-with-boeing-for-two-new-air-force-ones-nbc-news.html |access-date=November 30, 2020}}</ref>
* '''[[Boeing E-4|E-4B]]''' – This is an airborne command post designed for use in nuclear war. Three E-4As, based on the 747-200B, with a fourth aircraft, with more powerful engines and upgraded systems delivered in 1979 as an E-4B, with the three E-4As upgraded to this standard.{{sfn|Bowers|1989|page=528–529}}<ref name="donp76-7">Donald and Lake 1996, pp. 76–77.</ref> Formerly known as the National Emergency Airborne Command Post (referred to colloquially as "Kneecap"), this type is now referred to as the National Airborne Operations Center (NAOC).<ref name="donp76-7" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Terdiman |first=Donald |date=July 23, 2013 |title=Aboard America's Doomsday command and control plane |url=https://www.cnet.com/news/aboard-americas-doomsday-command-and-control-plane/ |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=CNET}}</ref>
* '''[[Boeing E-4|E-4B]]''' – This is an airborne command post designed for use in nuclear war. Three E-4As, based on the 747-200B, with a fourth aircraft, with more powerful engines and upgraded systems delivered in 1979 as an E-4B, with the three E-4As upgraded to this standard.{{sfn|Bowers|1989|page=528–529}}<ref name="donp76-7">Donald and Lake 1996, pp. 76–77.</ref> Formerly known as the National Emergency Airborne Command Post (referred to colloquially as "Kneecap"), this type is now referred to as the National Airborne Operations Center (NAOC).<ref name="donp76-7" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Terdiman |first=Donald |date=July 23, 2013 |title=Aboard America's Doomsday command and control plane |url=https://www.cnet.com/news/aboard-americas-doomsday-command-and-control-plane/ |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=CNET}}</ref>
** '''[[Survivable Airborne Operations Center]]''' - In April 2024, [[Sierra Nevada Corporation]] was awarded a contract to develop and build the [[Survivable Airborne Operations Center]] aircraft to replace the [[Boeing E-4|Boeing E-4 NAOC]]. Five 747-8Is were purchased from [[Korean Air]] for conversion, with the contract calling for nine in total.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/korean-air-sells-five-jets-us-aerospace-firm-sierra-nevada-4321311 | title=Korean Air sells five jets to US aerospace firm Sierra Nevada|date=May 2024|website=CNA|publisher=Mediacorp}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://theaviationist.com/2024/04/27/sierra-nevada-saoc-announcement/ | title=Sierra Nevada Corporation Will Build E-4B 'Doomsday' Plane Replacement | date=April 27, 2024 }}</ref>
** '''[[Survivable Airborne Operations Center]]''' - In April 2024, [[Sierra Nevada Corporation]] was awarded a contract to develop and build the [[Survivable Airborne Operations Center]] aircraft to replace the [[Boeing E-4|Boeing E-4 NAOC]]. Five 747-8Is were purchased from [[Korean Air]] for conversion, with the contract calling for nine in total.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/korean-air-sells-five-jets-us-aerospace-firm-sierra-nevada-4321311|title=Korean Air sells five jets to US aerospace firm Sierra Nevada|date=May 2024|website=CNA|publisher=Mediacorp|access-date=May 11, 2024|archive-date=May 12, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240512234320/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/korean-air-sells-five-jets-us-aerospace-firm-sierra-nevada-4321311|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://theaviationist.com/2024/04/27/sierra-nevada-saoc-announcement/ | title=Sierra Nevada Corporation Will Build E-4B 'Doomsday' Plane Replacement | date=April 27, 2024 }}</ref>
* '''[[Boeing YAL-1|YAL-1]]''' – This was the experimental [[Airborne Laser]], a planned component of the U.S. [[National Missile Defense]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Airborne Laser returns for more testing |url=https://www.afmc.af.mil/news/story?id=123038913 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070308070103/http://www.afmc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123038913 |archive-date=March 8, 2007 |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=Air Force}}</ref>
* '''[[Boeing YAL-1|YAL-1]]''' – This was the experimental [[Airborne Laser]], a planned component of the U.S. [[National Missile Defense]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Airborne Laser returns for more testing |url=https://www.afmc.af.mil/news/story?id=123038913 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070308070103/http://www.afmc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123038913 |archive-date=March 8, 2007 |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=Air Force}}</ref>
* '''[[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]] (SCA)''' – Two 747s were modified to carry the [[Space Shuttle orbiter]]. The first was a 747-100 (N905NA), and the other was a 747-100SR (N911NA). The first SCA carried the prototype [[Space Shuttle Enterprise|''Enterprise'']] during the [[Approach and Landing Tests]] in the late 1970s. The two SCA later carried all five operational Space Shuttle orbiters.<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 7, 2017 |editor-last=Gibbs |editor-first=Yvonne |title=NASA Armstrong Fact Sheet: Shuttle Carrier Aircraft |url=https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/news/FactSheets/FS-013-DFRC.html |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=[[NASA]]}}</ref>
* '''[[Shuttle Carrier Aircraft]] (SCA)''' – Two 747s were modified to carry the [[Space Shuttle orbiter]]. The first was a 747-100 (N905NA), and the other was a 747-100SR (N911NA). The first SCA carried the prototype [[Space Shuttle Enterprise|''Enterprise'']] during the [[Approach and Landing Tests]] in the late 1970s. The two SCA later carried all five operational Space Shuttle orbiters.<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 7, 2017 |editor-last=Gibbs |editor-first=Yvonne |title=NASA Armstrong Fact Sheet: Shuttle Carrier Aircraft |url=https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/news/FactSheets/FS-013-DFRC.html |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=[[NASA]]}}</ref>
* '''[[Boeing 747-400|C-33]]''' – This aircraft was a proposed U.S. military version of the 747-400F intended to augment the [[C-17 Globemaster III|C-17]] fleet. The plan was canceled in favor of additional C-17s.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tirpak |first=John A. |date=February 1996 |title=Airlift Moves Up and Out |url=https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/0296airlift/ |access-date=June 30, 2025 |website=Air Force Magazine}}</ref>
* '''[[Boeing 747-400|C-33]]''' – This aircraft was a proposed U.S. military version of the 747-400F intended to augment the [[C-17 Globemaster III|C-17]] fleet. The plan was canceled in favor of additional C-17s.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tirpak |first=John A. |date=February 1996 |title=Airlift Moves Up and Out |url=https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/0296airlift/ |access-date=June 30, 2025 |website=Air Force Magazine}}</ref>
* '''KC-25/33''' – A proposed 747-200F was also adapted as an [[aerial refueling]] [[Tanker (aircraft)|tanker]] and was bid against the DC-10-30 during the 1970s Advanced Cargo Transport Aircraft (ACTA) program that produced the [[KC-10 Extender]]. Before the 1979 [[Iranian Revolution]], Iran bought four 747-100 aircraft with air-refueling boom conversions to support its fleet of [[F-4 Phantom]]s.<ref>Hamilton, S. [https://web.archive.org/web/20080216064539/http://www.leeham.net/filelib/ScottsColumn091107.pdf "Boeing advanced 747 as tanker (PDF)"]. ''Leeham Company'', September 11, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> There is a report of the Iranians using a 747 Tanker in [[H-3 airstrike]] during [[Iran–Iraq War]].<ref name=MEMIM>{{Cite web |last=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=H3 airstrike |url=http://memim.com/h3-airstrike.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160129042258/http://memim.com/h3-airstrike.html |archive-date=January 29, 2016 |access-date=January 20, 2016 |website=MEMIM Encyclopedia}}</ref> It is unknown whether these aircraft remain usable as tankers. Since then there have been proposals to use a 747-400 for that role.<ref name="APA_KC-33">[https://web.archive.org/web/20050716004716/http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2005-02.pdf "KC-33A: Closing the Aerial Refuelling and Strategic Air Mobility Gaps (PDF)"]. ''Air Power Australia Analysis APA-2005-02'', April 16, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref>
* '''KC-25/33''' – A proposed 747-200F was also adapted as an [[aerial refueling]] [[Tanker (aircraft)|tanker]] and was bid against the DC-10-30 during the 1970s Advanced Cargo Transport Aircraft (ACTA) program that produced the [[KC-10 Extender]]. Before the 1979 [[Iranian Revolution]], Iran bought four 747-100 aircraft with air-refueling boom conversions to support its fleet of [[F-4 Phantom]]s and [[Grumman F-14 Tomcat|F-14 Tomcat]]s.<ref name="Iran747destroyed">{{cite web |url=https://theaviationgeekclub.com/worlds-only-kc-747-tanker-operated-by-iriaf-targeted-and-destroyed-at-mehrabad-airport/ |title=Rare Boeing 747 (operated by IRIAF) cargo aircraft targeted and destroyed at Mehrabad Airport |publisher=The Aviation Geek Club |last=Leone |first=Dario |date=7 March 2026}}</ref><ref name="HamiltonTanker">Hamilton, S. [https://web.archive.org/web/20080216064539/http://www.leeham.net/filelib/ScottsColumn091107.pdf "Boeing advanced 747 as tanker (PDF)"]. ''Leeham Company'', September 11, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref> The last of the Iranian tankers was claimed to be destroyed by the [[Israeli Air Force]] (IAF) during [[Twelve-Day War|Operation Rising Lion]] in June 2025.<ref name="Iran747destroyed"/> Since then, there have been proposals to use a 747-400 for that role.<ref name="APA_KC-33">[https://web.archive.org/web/20050716004716/http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2005-02.pdf "KC-33A: Closing the Aerial Refuelling and Strategic Air Mobility Gaps (PDF)"]. ''Air Power Australia Analysis APA-2005-02'', April 16, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref>
* '''747F Airlifter''' – Proposed US [[military transport aircraft|military transport]] version of the 747-200F intended as an alternative to further purchases of the [[C-5 Galaxy]]. This 747 would have had a special nose jack to lower the sill height for the nose door. System tested in 1980 on a [[Flying Tiger Line]] 747-200F.<ref>AFMD-82-123 Improper Lobbying Activities by the Department of Defense on the Proposed Procurement of the C-5B Aircraft https://www.gao.gov/assets/210/205747.pdf</ref>
* '''747F Airlifter''' – Proposed US [[military transport aircraft|military transport]] version of the 747-200F intended as an alternative to further purchases of the [[C-5 Galaxy]]. This 747 would have had a special nose jack to lower the sill height for the nose door. System tested in 1980 on a [[Flying Tiger Line]] 747-200F.<ref>{{cite web |title=AFMD-82-123 Improper Lobbying Activities by the Department of Defense on the Proposed Procurement of the C-5B Aircraft |url=https://www.gao.gov/assets/210/205747.pdf |publisher=General Accounting Office |location=US |date=1982-09-29 |access-date=2026-05-31}}</ref>
* '''747 CMCA''' – This "Cruise Missile Carrier Aircraft" variant was considered by the U.S. Air Force during the development of the [[B-1 Lancer]] strategic bomber. It would have been equipped with 50 to 100 [[AGM-86 ALCM]] [[cruise missile]]s on rotary launchers. This plan was abandoned in favor of more conventional strategic bombers.{{sfn|Jenkins|1999}}
* '''747 CMCA''' – This "Cruise Missile Carrier Aircraft" variant was considered by the U.S. Air Force during the development of the [[B-1 Lancer]] strategic bomber. It would have been equipped with 50 to 100 [[AGM-86 ALCM]] [[cruise missile]]s on rotary launchers. This plan was abandoned in favor of more conventional strategic bombers.{{sfn|Jenkins|1999}}
* '''MC-747''' – Two separate studies from the 1970s and 2005, the first by Boeing and the second by [[Thiokol|ATK]] and [[BAE Systems]], to horizontally store up to four [[LGM-118 Peacekeeper|Peacekeeper]] [[Intercontinental ballistic missile|ICBM]]s or seven [[LGM-30 Minuteman|Minutemen]] above bomb bay-like doors in the first study,<ref name="MC-747 study 1 FaE">{{cite web | title=Boeing 747 Nuke Launcher – Found And Explained | website=Found And Explained – Aviation Stories, Facts and Animations! | date=May 13, 2021 | url=https://foundandexplained.com/2021/05/13/boeing-747-nuke-launcher/ | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref><ref name="MC-747 study 1 APR">{{cite web | title=MC-747 – Aerospace Projects Review Blog | website=aerospaceprojectsreview.com | date=September 11, 2013 | url=https://www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com/blog/?p=1316 | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref> and to vertically store twelve Minutemen or 32 [[Joint Direct Attack Munition|JDAM]]-equipped conventional missiles for launch from ''in situ'' tubes in the second.<ref name="Mizokami 2016">{{cite web | last=Mizokami | first=Kyle | title=That Time a Defense Contractor Wanted to Put ICBMs on 747s | website=Popular Mechanics | date=August 4, 2016 | url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a22197/icbms-on-747s-plan/ | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref><ref name="MC-747 study 2 US">{{cite web | title=Flying Boomers – The Unwanted Blog | website=up-ship.com | date=August 19, 2011 | url=https://up-ship.com/blog/?p=11404 | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref>
* '''MC-747''' – Two separate studies from the 1970s and 2005, the first by Boeing and the second by [[Thiokol|ATK]] and [[BAE Systems]], to horizontally store up to four [[LGM-118 Peacekeeper|Peacekeeper]] [[Intercontinental ballistic missile|ICBM]]s or seven [[LGM-30 Minuteman|Minutemen]] above bomb bay-like doors in the first study,<ref name="MC-747 study 1 FaE">{{cite web | title=Boeing 747 Nuke Launcher – Found And Explained | website=Found And Explained – Aviation Stories, Facts and Animations! | date=May 13, 2021 | url=https://foundandexplained.com/2021/05/13/boeing-747-nuke-launcher/ | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref><ref name="MC-747 study 1 APR">{{cite web | title=MC-747 – Aerospace Projects Review Blog | website=aerospaceprojectsreview.com | date=September 11, 2013 | url=https://www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com/blog/?p=1316 | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref> and to vertically store twelve Minutemen or 32 [[Joint Direct Attack Munition|JDAM]]-equipped conventional missiles for launch from ''in situ'' tubes in the second.<ref name="Mizokami 2016">{{cite web | last=Mizokami | first=Kyle | title=That Time a Defense Contractor Wanted to Put ICBMs on 747s | website=Popular Mechanics | date=August 4, 2016 | url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a22197/icbms-on-747s-plan/ | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref><ref name="MC-747 study 2 US">{{cite web | title=Flying Boomers – The Unwanted Blog | website=up-ship.com | date=August 19, 2011 | url=https://up-ship.com/blog/?p=11404 | access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref>
* '''747 AAC''' – A Boeing study under contract from the USAF for an "[[airborne aircraft carrier]]" for up to 10 Boeing Model 985-121 "[[Parasite fighter|microfighters]]" with the ability to launch, retrieve, re-arm, and refuel. Boeing believed that the scheme would be able to deliver a flexible and fast carrier platform with global reach, particularly where other bases were not available. Modified versions of the 747-200 and Lockheed C-5A were considered as the base aircraft. The concept, which included a complementary 747 AWACS version with two reconnaissance "microfighters", was considered technically feasible in 1973.<ref>{{Cite web |date=September 1973 |title=Investigation of a Micro-Fighter / Airborne Aircraft Carrier Concept |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/529372.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141113142104/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/529372.pdf |archive-date=November 13, 2014 |access-date=November 21, 2015 |publisher=Defense Technical Information Center}}</ref>
* '''747 AAC''' – A Boeing study under contract from the USAF for an "[[airborne aircraft carrier]]" for up to 10 Boeing Model 985-121 "[[Parasite fighter|microfighters]]" with the ability to launch, retrieve, re-arm, and refuel. Boeing believed that the scheme would be able to deliver a flexible and fast carrier platform with global reach, particularly where other bases were not available. Modified versions of the 747-200 and Lockheed C-5A were considered as the base aircraft. The concept, which included a complementary 747 AWACS version with two reconnaissance "microfighters", was considered technically feasible in 1973.<ref>{{Cite web |date=September 1973 |title=Investigation of a Micro-Fighter / Airborne Aircraft Carrier Concept |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/529372.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141113142104/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/529372.pdf |archive-date=November 13, 2014 |access-date=November 21, 2015 |publisher=Defense Technical Information Center}}</ref>
* '''[[Evergreen 747 Supertanker]]''' – A Boeing 747-200 modified as an aerial application platform for fire fighting using {{convert|20000|USgal|L}} of firefighting chemicals.<ref>[http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/3daa36596e85e7a58625721f00596da7/$FILE/ST01912LA.pdf "Supplementary Type Certificate ST01912LA Installation and removal of internal tanks, associated systems and support structure for the aerial dispersant of liquids"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110822231113/http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/3daa36596e85e7a58625721f00596da7/$FILE/ST01912LA.pdf |date=August 22, 2011 }}. US Federal Aviation Administration, October 27, 2006.</ref>
* '''[[Evergreen 747 Supertanker]]''' – A 747-200 modified as an aerial application platform for fire fighting using {{convert|20000|USgal|L}} of firefighting chemicals.<ref>[http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/3daa36596e85e7a58625721f00596da7/$FILE/ST01912LA.pdf "Supplementary Type Certificate ST01912LA Installation and removal of internal tanks, associated systems and support structure for the aerial dispersant of liquids"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110822231113/http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/3daa36596e85e7a58625721f00596da7/$FILE/ST01912LA.pdf |date=August 22, 2011 }}. US Federal Aviation Administration, October 27, 2006.</ref>
* '''[[Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy]]''' (SOFIA) – A former Pan Am Boeing 747SP modified to carry a large infrared-sensitive telescope, in a joint venture of NASA and [[German Aerospace Center|DLR]]. High altitudes are needed for [[infrared astronomy]], to rise above infrared-absorbing water vapor in the atmosphere.<ref name="SOFIA_factsheet">{{Cite web |date=2010 |title=Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy 308911 SOFIA Quick Facts |url=http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091028055114/http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |archive-date=October 28, 2009 |access-date=December 2, 2010 |website=nasa.gov |publisher=National Aeronautics and Space Administration |page=1}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) |url=http://astro.uchicago.edu/research/stratospheric-observatory-for-infrared-astronomy.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100610114345/http://astro.uchicago.edu/research/stratospheric-observatory-for-infrared-astronomy.shtml |archive-date=June 10, 2010 |access-date=December 2, 2020 |website=The University of Chicago: Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics}}</ref>
* '''[[Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy]]''' (SOFIA) – A former Pan Am 747SP modified to carry a large infrared-sensitive telescope, in a joint venture of NASA and [[German Aerospace Center|DLR]]. High altitudes are needed for [[infrared astronomy]], to rise above infrared-absorbing water vapor in the atmosphere.<ref name="SOFIA_factsheet">{{Cite web |date=2010 |title=Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy 308911 SOFIA Quick Facts |url=http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091028055114/http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |archive-date=October 28, 2009 |access-date=December 2, 2010 |website=nasa.gov |publisher=National Aeronautics and Space Administration |page=1}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) |url=http://astro.uchicago.edu/research/stratospheric-observatory-for-infrared-astronomy.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100610114345/http://astro.uchicago.edu/research/stratospheric-observatory-for-infrared-astronomy.shtml |archive-date=June 10, 2010 |access-date=December 2, 2020 |website=The University of Chicago: Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics}}</ref>
* A number of other governments also use the 747 as a VIP transport, including Bahrain, Brunei, [[Air transports of Heads of State#India|India]], Iran, [[Air transports of Heads of State#Japan|Japan]], Kuwait, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Several [[Boeing 747-8]]s have been ordered by [[Boeing Business Jet]] for conversion to VIP transports for several unidentified customers.<ref>[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003290459_webbdigboeing05.html "Boeing nets 57 new orders, including big VIP planes."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160204023618/http://old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2003290459_webbdigboeing05.html |date=February 4, 2016}} ''Seattle Times''. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.</ref>
* A number of other governments also use the 747 as a VIP transport, including Bahrain, Brunei, [[Air transports of Heads of State#India|India]], Iran, [[Air transports of Heads of State#Japan|Japan]], Kuwait, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Several [[Boeing 747-8|747-8]]s have been ordered by [[Boeing Business Jet]] for conversion to VIP transports for several unidentified customers.<ref>[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003290459_webbdigboeing05.html "Boeing nets 57 new orders, including big VIP planes."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160204023618/http://old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2003290459_webbdigboeing05.html |date=February 4, 2016}} ''Seattle Times''. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.</ref>
 
=== Comparison ===
Below is a list of major differences between the original 747 variants.
{| class="wikitable sortable sticky-header" style="text-align:center"
|-
! Model
! 747-100<ref name="100/200/300startup">{{Cite web |date=2007 |title=747-100/-200/-300/-SP |url=http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/startup/pdf/historical/747-100_-200_-300_-SP_passenger.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/startup/pdf/historical/747-100_-200_-300_-SP_passenger.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |website=Startup |publisher=Boeing}}</ref>
! 747-200B<ref name="100/200/300startup" />
! 747-300<ref name="100/200/300startup" />
|-
! Typical seats
| colspan=2 | 366
| 400
|-
<!--Weights-->
! [[Maximum takeoff weight|MTOW]]<ref name="acap_123sp">{{Cite web |date=May 2011 |title=Boeing 747-100/-200/-300/-SP ACAPS |url=https://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_123sp.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_123sp.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |website=Boeing Airplanes}}</ref>
| {{cvt|735000-750000|lb|t|1|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
| colspan="2" | {{cvt|775000-833000|lb|t|1|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|-
! [[Operating empty weight|OEW]]<ref name="acap_123sp" />
| {{cvt|358000-381480|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|376170-388010|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|384240-402700|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|-
! Fuel<br />capacity<ref name="acap_123sp" />
| {{cvt|47,210-48,445|USgal|L|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
| colspan="2" | {{cvt|52,035-52,410|USgal|L|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|-
<!--Engines-->
! [[Turbofan]] (×4)
| colspan=3 |[[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]] or [[Rolls-Royce RB211]] or [[General Electric CF6]]
|-
! Thrust (×4)
| {{cvt|43,500-51,600|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|46,300-54,750|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|46,300-56,900|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|-
<!--Performance-->
! Range
| {{cvt|4620|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|name=100/200range|JT9D, 366 passengers and baggage}}
| {{cvt|6560|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|name=100/200range}}
| {{cvt|6330|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|400 passengers and baggage}}
|-
! Takeoff
| {{cvt|10650|ft|m|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|10900|ft|m|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|10900|ft|m|abbr=on}}
|}
{{notelist}}


=== Proposed variants ===
=== Proposed variants ===
Line 292: Line 453:
Boeing announced the 747-500X and -600X at the 1996 [[Farnborough Airshow]].<ref name="boe_1996" /> The proposed models would have combined the 747's fuselage with a new wing spanning {{Convert|251|ft|m|abbr=out}} derived from the 777. Other changes included adding more powerful engines and increasing the number of tires from two to four on the nose landing gear and from 16 to 20 on the main landing gear.<ref name="faa_nla">Patterson, James W. [http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar97-26.pdf "Impact of New Large Aircraft on Airport Design (PDF)"]. ''[[Federal Aviation Administration]]'', March 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref>
Boeing announced the 747-500X and -600X at the 1996 [[Farnborough Airshow]].<ref name="boe_1996" /> The proposed models would have combined the 747's fuselage with a new wing spanning {{Convert|251|ft|m|abbr=out}} derived from the 777. Other changes included adding more powerful engines and increasing the number of tires from two to four on the nose landing gear and from 16 to 20 on the main landing gear.<ref name="faa_nla">Patterson, James W. [http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar97-26.pdf "Impact of New Large Aircraft on Airport Design (PDF)"]. ''[[Federal Aviation Administration]]'', March 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref>


The 747-500X concept featured a fuselage length increased by {{Convert|18|ft|m|abbr=out}} to {{Convert|250|ft|m|abbr=out}}, and the aircraft was to carry 462 passengers over a range up to {{Convert|8700|nmi|abbr=out}}, with a gross weight of over 1.0&nbsp;[[Mega-|Mlb]] (450&nbsp;tonnes).<ref name="faa_nla" /> The 747-600X concept featured a greater stretch to {{Convert|279|ft|m|abbr=out}} with seating for 548 passengers, a range of up to {{Convert|7700|nmi|abbr=on}}, and a gross weight of 1.2&nbsp;Mlb (540&nbsp;tonnes).<ref name="faa_nla" /> A third study concept, the 747-700X, would have combined the wing of the 747-600X with a widened fuselage, allowing it to carry 650 passengers over the same range as a {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref name="boe_1996" /> The cost of the changes from previous 747 models, in particular the new wing for the 747-500X and -600X, was estimated to be more than US$5&nbsp;billion.<ref name="boe_1996" /> Boeing was not able to attract enough interest to launch the aircraft.<ref name="FI_500X" />
The 747-500X concept featured a fuselage length increased by {{Convert|18|ft|m|abbr=out}} to {{Convert|250|ft|m|abbr=out}}, and the aircraft was to carry 462 passengers over a range up to {{Convert|8700|nmi|abbr=out}}, with a gross weight of over 1.0&nbsp;[[Mega-|Mlb]] (450&nbsp;tonnes).<ref name="faa_nla" /> The 747-600X concept featured a greater stretch to {{Convert|279|ft|m|abbr=out}} with seating for 548 passengers, a range of up to {{Convert|7700|nmi|abbr=on}}, and a gross weight of 1.2&nbsp;Mlb (540&nbsp;tonnes).<ref name="faa_nla" /> A third study concept, the 747-700X, would have combined the wing of the 747-600X with a widened fuselage, allowing it to carry 650 passengers over the same range as a {{not a typo|747-400}}.<ref name="boe_1996" /> The cost of the changes from previous 747 models, especially the new wing for the 747-500X and -600X, was estimated to be more than US$5&nbsp;billion.<ref name="boe_1996" /> Boeing was not able to attract enough interest to launch the aircraft.<ref name="FI_500X" />


==== 747X and 747X Stretch ====
==== 747X and 747X Stretch ====
Line 298: Line 459:


[[File:Qantas Boeing 747-438ER VH-OEI at LAX.jpg|thumb|The 747-400ER was derived from the 747-400X study.|alt=Side view of quadjet in flight]]
[[File:Qantas Boeing 747-438ER VH-OEI at LAX.jpg|thumb|The 747-400ER was derived from the 747-400X study.|alt=Side view of quadjet in flight]]
Like its predecessor, the 747X family was unable to garner enough interest to justify production, and it was shelved along with the 767-400ERX in March 2001, when Boeing announced the [[Boeing Sonic Cruiser|Sonic Cruiser]] concept.<ref name="shelv_747X" /> Though the 747X design was less costly than the 747-500X and -600X, it was criticized for not offering a sufficient advance from the existing {{not a typo|747-400}}. The 747X did not make it beyond the drawing board, but the 747-400X being developed concurrently moved into production to become the 747-400ER.<ref>{{Cite press release |title=Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400 |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090706141448/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |archive-date=July 6, 2009 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |work=The Boeing Company}}</ref>
Like its predecessor, the 747X family was unable to garner enough interest to justify production, and it was shelved along with the 767-400ERX in March 2001, when Boeing announced the [[Boeing Sonic Cruiser|Sonic Cruiser]] concept.<ref name="shelv_747X" /> Though the 747X design was less costly than the 747-500X and -600X, it was criticized for not offering a sufficient advance from the existing {{not a typo|747-400}}. The 747X did not make it beyond the drawing board, but the 747-400X being developed concurrently moved into production to become the 747-400ER.<ref>{{Cite press release |title=Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400 |url=http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090706141448/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_001128c.html |archive-date=July 6, 2009 |access-date=December 17, 2007 |work=The Boeing Company}}</ref>


Line 305: Line 467:
== Operators ==
== Operators ==
{{Main|List of Boeing 747 operators}}
{{Main|List of Boeing 747 operators}}
In 1979, Qantas became the first airline in the world to operate an all Boeing 747 fleet, with seventeen aircraft.<ref>All Jumbos ''[[Australian Transport]]'' February 1979 p. 22.</ref>
 
The 747 was utilized by various airlines from the [[Asia-Pacific]] region, the [[Americas]], [[Europe]], the [[Middle East]], and [[Africa]].{{sfn|Seo|1984|pages=41-82}} Historically, it was the primary long-haul aircraft for operators like [[Air France]], [[Air New Zealand]], [[British Airways]], [[Cathay Pacific]], [[Japan Airlines]], [[Lufthansa]], [[Northwest Airlines]], [[Pan Am]], [[Qantas]], [[Singapore Airlines]], and [[United Airlines]].{{sfn|Sutter|2006|page=217}} Qantas notably became the first airline in the world to operate an all-747 fleet after the retirement of its last 707 in 1979. In 1984, Qantas operated a total of 25 aircraft.{{sfn|Seo|1984|page=51}}<ref name="AusTranspo7902">All Jumbos ''[[Australian Transport]]'' February 1979 p. 22.</ref>
 
During the [[Cold War]], Boeing refused to sell 747s to the [[Soviet Union]] due to political tensions and suspicions of [[industrial espionage]] raised in the 1970s after delegates from the Soviet [[Ministry of Aviation Industry (Soviet Union)|Ministry of Aviation Industry]] visited the Everett factory, in the guise of negotiating for the purchase of 25 747s, and attempted to obtain copies of a document pertaining to the 747's design objectives and criteria, which the design team successfully prevented.{{sfn|Serling|1992|page=367}}{{sfn|Sutter|2006|pages=232-235}}


{{As of|2019|July|}}, there were 462 Boeing 747s in airline service, with [[Atlas Air]] and [[British Airways]] being the largest operators with 33 747-400s each.<ref>Thisdell and Seymour ''Flight International'' July 30 – August 5, 2019, pp. 25, 39–40.</ref>
{{As of|2019|July|}}, there were 462 Boeing 747s in airline service, with [[Atlas Air]] and [[British Airways]] being the largest operators with 33 747-400s each.<ref>Thisdell and Seymour ''Flight International'' July 30 – August 5, 2019, pp. 25, 39–40.</ref>


The last US passenger Boeing 747 was retired from Delta Air Lines in December 2017. The model flew for almost every American [[major carrier]] since its 1970 introduction.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Edward Russell |date=October 12, 2017 |title=US 747s fly into the sunset |work=Flightglobal |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/analysis-us-747s-fly-into-the-sunset-441290/}}</ref> Delta flew three of its last four aircraft on a farewell tour, from Seattle to Atlanta on December 19 then to Los Angeles and Minneapolis/St Paul on December 20.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Edward Russell |date=December 19, 2017 |title=US 747s bow out with final Delta flight |work=Flightglobal |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/analysis-us-747s-bow-out-with-final-delta-flight-444250/}}</ref>
The last US passenger Boeing 747 was retired from [[Delta Air Lines]] in December 2017. The model flew for almost every American [[major carrier]] since its 1970 introduction.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Edward Russell |date=October 12, 2017 |title=US 747s fly into the sunset |work=Flightglobal |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/analysis-us-747s-fly-into-the-sunset-441290/}}</ref> Delta flew three of its last four aircraft on a farewell tour, from Seattle to Atlanta on December 19 then to Los Angeles and Minneapolis/St Paul on December 20.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Edward Russell |date=December 19, 2017 |title=US 747s bow out with final Delta flight |work=Flightglobal |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/analysis-us-747s-bow-out-with-final-delta-flight-444250/}}</ref>


As the [[International Air Transport Association|IATA]] forecast an increase in [[air freight]] from 4% to 5% in 2018 fueled by booming trade for time-sensitive goods, from smartphones to fresh flowers, demand for freighters is strong while passenger 747s are phased out.<!--<ref name=Bloomberg16may2018>-->
As the [[International Air Transport Association|IATA]] forecast an increase in [[air freight]] from 4% to 5% in 2018 fueled by booming trade for time-sensitive goods, from smartphones to fresh flowers, demand for freighters is strong while passenger 747s are phased out.<!--<ref name=Bloomberg16may2018>-->
Line 354: Line 519:
| 24 || 16 || 22 || 26 || 53 || 73 || 67 || 32 || 20 || 27 || 21 || 22 || 30 || 30 || 69 || 92 || 4 || – || – || –
| 24 || 16 || 22 || 26 || 53 || 73 || 67 || 32 || 20 || 27 || 21 || 22 || 30 || 30 || 69 || 92 || 4 || – || – || –
|}
|}
'''Boeing 747 orders and deliveries (cumulative, by year):'''<br />
'''Boeing 747 orders and deliveries (cumulative, by year):'''<br />
<timeline>
<timeline>
Line 503: Line 669:
|-
|-
!747-200B
!747-200B
|rowspan=6| B742{{efn|name=v|B742 includes the [[Boeing VC-25|VC-25]], two 747-200Bs modified for the [[United States Air Force|U.S. Air Force]].}}||225
|rowspan=6| B742||225{{efn|name=v|Includes the [[Boeing VC-25|VC-25A]], two heavily modified 747-200Bs used for presidential transport by the [[United States Air Force|U.S. Air Force]].}}
|rowspan=6| {{#expr:225+13+73+78+3+1}}
|rowspan=6| {{#expr:225+13+73+78+3+1}}
|-
|-
Line 516: Line 682:
|-
|-
![[Boeing E-4|747 E-4A]]
![[Boeing E-4|747 E-4A]]
|3
|3{{efn|All aircraft were later converted to E-4Bs.<ref>{{cite web |title=E-4B Fact Sheet |url=https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104503/e-4b/ |website=US Air Force |publisher=US Air Force |access-date=2 February 2026 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105202809/https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104503/e-4b/ |archive-date=5 January 2026}}</ref>}}
|-
|-
!747-E4B
!747 E-4B
|1
|1
|-
|-
Line 565: Line 731:
{{main|Boeing 747 hull losses}}
{{main|Boeing 747 hull losses}}


{{As of|2023|11|df=US}}, the 747 has been involved in 173 [[aviation accidents and incidents]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 occurrences |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/dblist.php?Type=104 |access-date=January 1, 2024 |publisher=Flight Safety Foundation}}</ref> including 64 [[hull loss]]es (52 in-flight accidents),<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 hull-loss occurrences |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/dblist.php?field=typecode&var=104%&cat=%1&sorteer=datekey&page=1 |access-date=January 1, 2024 |publisher=Flight Safety Foundation}}</ref> causing {{formatnum:{{#expr:2865+857+24}}}} fatalities.<ref name="ASNstats">{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 Statistics |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/type/type-stat.php?type=104 |access-date=January 1, 2024 |publisher=Flight Safety Foundation}}</ref> There have been several hijackings of Boeing 747s, such as [[Pan Am Flight 73]], a 747-100 hijacked by four terrorists, resulting in 20 deaths.<ref name="ASN_Pan_Am">{{Cite web |date=August 30, 2017 |title=ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-121 N656PA Karachi-Quaid-E-Azam International Airport |url=https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19860905-0 |access-date=August 30, 2017 |publisher=Aviation-safety.net}}</ref> The 747 also fell victim to several mid-air bombings, two of which resulted in major fatalities and hull losses, [[Air India Flight 182]] in 1985, and [[Pan Am Flight 103]] in 1988.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19850623-2|title= Air India Flight 182 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19881221-0|title= Pan Am Flight 103 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19941211-5|title= Philippine Air Lines Flight 434 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref>
{{As of|2023|11|df=US}}, the 747 has been involved in 173 [[aviation accidents and incidents]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 occurrences |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/dblist.php?Type=104 |access-date=January 1, 2024 |publisher=Flight Safety Foundation}}</ref> including 65 [[hull loss]]es (53 in-flight accidents),<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 hull-loss occurrences |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/dblist.php?field=typecode&var=104%&cat=%1&sorteer=datekey&page=1 |access-date=January 1, 2024 |publisher=Flight Safety Foundation}}</ref> causing {{formatnum:{{#expr:2865+857+24}}}} fatalities.<ref name="ASNstats">{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 Statistics |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/type/type-stat.php?type=104 |access-date=January 1, 2024 |publisher=Flight Safety Foundation}}</ref> There have been several hijackings of Boeing 747s, such as [[Pan Am Flight 73]], a 747-100 hijacked by four terrorists, resulting in 20 deaths.<ref name="ASN_Pan_Am">{{Cite web |date=August 30, 2017 |title=ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-121 N656PA Karachi-Quaid-E-Azam International Airport |url=https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19860905-0 |access-date=August 30, 2017 |publisher=Aviation-safety.net}}</ref> The 747 also fell victim to several mid-air bombings, two of which resulted in major fatalities and hull losses, [[Air India Flight 182]] in 1985, and [[Pan Am Flight 103]] in 1988.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19850623-2|title= Air India Flight 182 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19881221-0|title= Pan Am Flight 103 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19941211-5|title= Philippine Air Lines Flight 434 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref>


The deadliest aviation accident, [[Tenerife airport disaster|the Tenerife airport disaster]], resulted from pilot error and communications failure, while the [[Japan Air Lines Flight 123]] and [[China Airlines Flight 611]] crashes stemmed from improper aircraft repair due to a tail-strike. [[Korean Air Lines Flight 007]] was shot down by a Soviet [[Sukhoi Su-15|Su-15TM]] interceptor in 1983 after it had violated Soviet airspace for over 12 minutes, causing US President Ronald Reagan to authorize the then-strictly-military [[global positioning system]] (GPS) for civilian use.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/a26980/why-the-military-released-gps-to-the-public/|title=Why the Military Released GPS to the Public|first=Juquai|last=McDuffie|date=June 19, 2017|website=Popular Mechanics|access-date=June 14, 2022|archive-date=January 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200128214307/https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/a26980/why-the-military-released-gps-to-the-public/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author1=Viktor Belenko |title=What Really Happened To KAL Flight 007 |url=https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00552R000100490002-7.pdf |publisher=CIA |access-date=1 June 2025}}</ref> [[South African Airways Flight 295]], a 747-200M Combi, which crashed on 28 November 1987 due to an inflight fire, led to the mandate of adding fire-suppression systems on board Combi variants.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://accidents-ll.faa.gov/ll_main.cfm?TabID=3&CategoryID=18&LLID=33|title=Lessons Learned From Transport Airplane Accidents: Fire|publisher=[[Federal Aviation Administration]]|access-date=25 July 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130225223803/http://accidents-ll.faa.gov/ll_main.cfm?TabID=3&CategoryID=18&LLID=33|archive-date=25 February 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAD.nsf/0/F216CB41A2C82E168625696F0071E803?OpenDocument&Highlight=93-07-15|publisher=[[Federal Aviation Administration]]|title=Airworthiness Directive 93-07-15|date=2 May 1993|access-date=25 July 2011|archive-date=29 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180129004331/http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAD.nsf/0/F216CB41A2C82E168625696F0071E803?OpenDocument&Highlight=93-07-15|url-status=dead}}</ref>
The deadliest aviation accident, [[Tenerife airport disaster|the Tenerife airport disaster]], resulted from pilot error and communications failure, while the [[Japan Air Lines Flight 123]] and [[China Airlines Flight 611]] crashes stemmed from improper aircraft repair due to a tail-strike. [[Korean Air Lines Flight 007]] was shot down by a Soviet [[Sukhoi Su-15|Su-15TM]] interceptor in 1983 after it had violated Soviet airspace for over 12 minutes, causing US President [[Ronald Reagan]] to authorize the then-strictly-military [[global positioning system]] (GPS) for civilian use.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/a26980/why-the-military-released-gps-to-the-public/|title=Why the Military Released GPS to the Public|first=Juquai|last=McDuffie|date=June 19, 2017|website=Popular Mechanics|access-date=June 14, 2022|archive-date=January 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200128214307/https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/a26980/why-the-military-released-gps-to-the-public/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |firs=Viktor |last=Belenko |title=What Really Happened To KAL Flight 007 |url=https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00552R000100490002-7.pdf |publisher=CIA |access-date=1 June 2025}}</ref> [[South African Airways Flight 295]], a 747-200M Combi, which crashed on 28 November 1987 due to an [[in-flight fire]], led to the mandate of adding fire-suppression systems on board Combi variants.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://accidents-ll.faa.gov/ll_main.cfm?TabID=3&CategoryID=18&LLID=33|title=Lessons Learned From Transport Airplane Accidents: Fire|publisher=[[Federal Aviation Administration]]|access-date=25 July 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130225223803/http://accidents-ll.faa.gov/ll_main.cfm?TabID=3&CategoryID=18&LLID=33|archive-date=25 February 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAD.nsf/0/F216CB41A2C82E168625696F0071E803?OpenDocument&Highlight=93-07-15|publisher=[[Federal Aviation Administration]]|title=Airworthiness Directive 93-07-15|date=2 May 1993|access-date=25 July 2011|archive-date=29 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180129004331/http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAD.nsf/0/F216CB41A2C82E168625696F0071E803?OpenDocument&Highlight=93-07-15|url-status=dead}}</ref>


A handful of crashes have been attributed to 747 design flaws, mainly older 747 classic (100/200/300/SP) variants. [[United Airlines Flight 811]], which suffered an [[uncontrolled decompression|explosive decompression]] mid-flight on February 24, 1989, led the [[National Transportation Safety Board]] (NTSB) to issue a recommendation that the Boeing 747-100 and 747-200 cargo doors similar to those on the Flight 811 aircraft be modified to those featured on the Boeing {{not a typo|747-400}}. [[TWA Flight 800]], a 747-100 that exploded in mid-air on July 17, 1996 due to sparking from the old and cracked electrical wires inside the fuel tank, where voltage levels exceeded the maximum limit, causing ignition of the fuel vapors inside the tank.<ref name="TWA_800_final">{{Cite journal |date=August 23, 2000 |title=Aircraft Accident Report: In-flight Breakup Over the Atlantic Ocean Trans World Airlines Flight 800 |url=https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2000/AAR0003.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=NTSB/Aar-00/03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615201201/https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2000/AAR0003.pdf |archive-date=June 15, 2013 |access-date=June 24, 2013}}</ref> This finding led the FAA to adopt a rule in July 2008 requiring installation of an [[inerting system]] in the center fuel tank of most large aircraft, after years of research into solutions. At the time, the new safety system was expected to cost US$100,000 to $450,000 per aircraft and weigh approximately {{convert|200|lb|kg}}.<ref>[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121621918865158639 "Airlines Ordered to Cut Fuel-Tank Explosion Risk"]. ''Wall Street Journal'', July 17, 2008, p. B5. Note: Cargo aircraft and smaller regional jets and commuter aircraft are not subject to this rule.</ref> Two 747-200F freighters - [[China Airlines Flight 358]] in December 1991 and [[El Al Flight 1862]] in October 1992, crashed after the fuse pins for an engine (no. 3) broke off shortly after take-off due to metal fatigue, and instead of simply dropping away from the wing, the engine knocked off the adjacent engine and damaged the wing.<ref name="ASN_Bijlmer">{{Cite web |title=ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-258F 4X-AXG Amsterdam |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19921004-2 |access-date=December 9, 2013 |publisher=Aviation-safety.net}}</ref> Following these crashes, Boeing issued a directive to examine and replace all fuse pins found to be cracked. The lack of adequate warning systems combined with flight crew error led to a preventable crash of [[Lufthansa Flight 540]] in November 1974, which was the first fatal crash of a 747,<ref name="GainJet">{{cite journal|url=http://gainjet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BlueSkies_03.pdf|title=Case Study: Lufthansa - Flight 540 - Boeing 747-130, November 20, 1974 |publisher=GainJet Aviation|periodical=Blue Skies: GainJet Aviation Safety Magazine|date=13 January 2022 |issue=3}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The First B-747 Goes Down Just After Takeoff|url=http://avstop.com/news/gd.html|website=avstop.com|access-date=2020-05-05}}</ref> while an instrument malfunction leading to crew disorientation caused the crash of [[Air India Flight 855]] on New Years Day in 1978.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19741120-0 |title= Lufthansa Flight 540 |website= Aviation Safety Network}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19780101-1|title= Air India Flight 855 |website= Aviation Safety Network}}</ref>  
A handful of crashes have been attributed to 747 design flaws, mainly older 747 classic (100/200/300/SP) variants. [[United Airlines Flight 811]], which suffered an [[uncontrolled decompression|explosive decompression]] mid-flight on February 24, 1989, led the [[National Transportation Safety Board]] (NTSB) to issue a recommendation that the Boeing 747-100 and 747-200 cargo doors similar to those on the Flight 811 aircraft be modified to those featured on the Boeing {{not a typo|747-400}}. [[TWA Flight 800]], a 747-100 that exploded in mid-air on July 17, 1996 due to sparking from the old and cracked electrical wires inside the fuel tank, where voltage levels exceeded the maximum limit, causing ignition of the fuel vapors inside the tank.<ref name="TWA_800_final">{{Cite journal |date=August 23, 2000 |title=Aircraft Accident Report: In-flight Breakup Over the Atlantic Ocean Trans World Airlines Flight 800 |url=https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2000/AAR0003.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=NTSB/Aar-00/03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615201201/https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2000/AAR0003.pdf |archive-date=June 15, 2013 |access-date=June 24, 2013}}</ref> This finding led the FAA to adopt a rule in July 2008 requiring installation of an [[inerting system]] in the center fuel tank of most large aircraft, after years of research into solutions. At the time, the new safety system was expected to cost US$100,000 to $450,000 per aircraft and weigh approximately {{convert|200|lb|kg}}.<ref>[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121621918865158639 "Airlines Ordered to Cut Fuel-Tank Explosion Risk"]. ''Wall Street Journal'', July 17, 2008, p. B5. Note: Cargo aircraft and smaller regional jets and commuter aircraft are not subject to this rule.</ref> Two 747-200F freighters - [[China Airlines Flight 358]] on December 29, 1991, and [[El Al Flight 1862]] on October 4, 1992, crashed after the fuse pins for an engine (no. 3) broke off shortly after take-off due to metal fatigue, and instead of simply dropping away from the wing, the engine knocked off the adjacent engine and damaged the wing.<ref name="ASN_Bijlmer">{{Cite web |title=ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-258F 4X-AXG Amsterdam |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19921004-2 |access-date=December 9, 2013 |publisher=Aviation-safety.net}}</ref> Following these crashes, Boeing issued a directive to examine and replace all fuse pins found to be cracked. The lack of adequate warning systems combined with flight crew error led to a preventable crash of [[Lufthansa Flight 540]] in November 1974, which was the first fatal crash of a 747,<ref name="GainJet">{{cite journal|url=http://gainjet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BlueSkies_03.pdf|title=Case Study: Lufthansa - Flight 540 - Boeing 747-130, November 20, 1974|publisher=GainJet Aviation|periodical=Blue Skies: GainJet Aviation Safety Magazine|date=13 January 2022|issue=3|archive-date=February 17, 2018|access-date=January 21, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180217202825/http://gainjet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BlueSkies_03.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The First B-747 Goes Down Just After Takeoff|url=http://avstop.com/news/gd.html|website=avstop.com|access-date=2020-05-05}}</ref> while an instrument malfunction leading to crew disorientation caused the crash of [[Air India Flight 855]] on New Years Day in 1978.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19741120-0 |title= Lufthansa Flight 540 |website= Aviation Safety Network}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19780101-1|title= Air India Flight 855 |website= Aviation Safety Network}}</ref>


Other incidents did not result in any hull losses, but the planes suffered certain damages and were put back into service after repair. On July 30, 1971, [[Pan Am Flight 845]] struck approach lighting system structures while taking off from San Francisco for Tokyo, Japan; the plane dumped fuel and landed back. The cause was pilot error with improper calculations, and the plane was repaired and returned to service.<ref>{{Cite web |url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19710730-2|title= Pan Am Flight 845 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref> On June 24, 1982, [[British Airways Flight 009|British Airways Flight 9]], a Boeing 747-200, registration ''G-BDXH'', flew through a cloud of volcanic ash and dust from the eruption of [[Galunggung|Mount Galunggung]], suffering an all engine flameout; the crew restarted the engines and successfully landed at Jakarta. The volcanic ash caused windscreens to be sandblasted along with engine damage and paint rip-off; the plane was repaired with engines replaced and returned to service.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19820624-0|title= British Airways Flight 9 - Aviation Service Network}}</ref> On December 11, 1994, on board [[Philippine Airlines Flight 434]] from Manila to Tokyo via Cebu, a bomb exploded under a seat, killing one passenger; the plane landed safely at Okinawa despite damage to the plane's controls. The bomber, [[Ramzi Yousef]], was caught on 7 February 1995 in Islamabad, Pakistan, and the plane was repaired, but converted for cargo use.<ref>{{Cite web |url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19941211-5 |title= Philippine Airlines Flight 434 - Airline Safety Network}}</ref>
Other incidents did not result in any hull losses, but the planes suffered certain damages and were put back into service after repair. On July 30, 1971, [[Pan Am Flight 845]] struck approach lighting system structures while taking off from San Francisco for Tokyo, Japan; the plane dumped fuel and landed back. The cause was pilot error with improper calculations, and the plane was repaired and returned to service.<ref>{{Cite web |url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19710730-2|title= Pan Am Flight 845 - Aviation Safety Network}}</ref> On June 24, 1982, [[British Airways Flight 009|British Airways Flight 9]], a Boeing 747-200, registration ''G-BDXH'', flew through a cloud of volcanic ash and dust from the eruption of [[Galunggung|Mount Galunggung]], suffering an all engine flameout; the crew restarted the engines and successfully landed at Jakarta. The volcanic ash caused windscreens to be sandblasted along with engine damage and paint rip-off; the plane was repaired with engines replaced and returned to service.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19820624-0|title= British Airways Flight 9 - Aviation Service Network}}</ref> On December 11, 1994, on board [[Philippine Airlines Flight 434]] from Manila to Tokyo via Cebu, a bomb exploded under a seat, killing one passenger; the plane landed safely at Okinawa despite damage to the plane's controls. The bomber, [[Ramzi Yousef]], was caught on 7 February 1995 in Islamabad, Pakistan, and the plane was repaired, but converted for cargo use.<ref>{{Cite web |url= https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19941211-5 |title= Philippine Airlines Flight 434 - Airline Safety Network}}</ref>
Line 578: Line 744:
[[File:Boeing 747-230 Schleswig-Holstein 06.JPG|thumb|Boeing 747-230B in [[Lufthansa]] livery on display at the [[Technikmuseum Speyer]] in Germany|alt=Ventral view of museum aircraft raised on struts.]]
[[File:Boeing 747-230 Schleswig-Holstein 06.JPG|thumb|Boeing 747-230B in [[Lufthansa]] livery on display at the [[Technikmuseum Speyer]] in Germany|alt=Ventral view of museum aircraft raised on struts.]]
[[File:747.JPG|thumb|Boeing 747-128 on display at the [[French Air and Space Museum|Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace]] in France|alt=A parked museum aircraft on static display]]
[[File:747.JPG|thumb|Boeing 747-128 on display at the [[French Air and Space Museum|Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace]] in France|alt=A parked museum aircraft on static display]]
[[File:VH-OJA City of Canberra.jpg|thumb|VH-OJA City of Canberra at [[Historical Aircraft Restoration Society|HARS]], [[Shellharbour Airport]]]]


As increasing numbers of "classic" 747-100 and {{not a typo|747-200}} series aircraft have been retired, some have been used for other uses such as museum displays. Some older 747-300s and 747-400s were later added to museum collections.
As increasing numbers of "classic" 747-100 and {{not a typo|747-200}} series aircraft have been retired, some have been used for other uses such as museum displays. Some older 747-300s and 747-400s were later added to museum collections.
Line 583: Line 750:
* 19651/025 – 747-121 registration [[N747GE]] at the [[Pima Air & Space Museum]], Tucson, Arizona, US.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/11/ge-aviation-donates-747-100-testbed-to-museum/ |title=GE Aviation Donates 747-100 Testbed to Museum |website=Australian Aviation |location=Australia |date=2018-11-19 |access-date=2025-06-23}}</ref>
* 19651/025 – 747-121 registration [[N747GE]] at the [[Pima Air & Space Museum]], Tucson, Arizona, US.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/11/ge-aviation-donates-747-100-testbed-to-museum/ |title=GE Aviation Donates 747-100 Testbed to Museum |website=Australian Aviation |location=Australia |date=2018-11-19 |access-date=2025-06-23}}</ref>
* 19778/027 – 747-151 registration N601US nose at the [[National Air and Space Museum]], Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://wtopnews.com/?nid=25&sid=1034371 |title=Historic Aircraft Lands at Air and Space Museum |work=WTOP News |date=2007-01-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070620025012/http://wtopnews.com/?nid=25&sid=1034371 |archive-date=2007-06-20 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
* 19778/027 – 747-151 registration N601US nose at the [[National Air and Space Museum]], Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://wtopnews.com/?nid=25&sid=1034371 |title=Historic Aircraft Lands at Air and Space Museum |work=WTOP News |date=2007-01-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070620025012/http://wtopnews.com/?nid=25&sid=1034371 |archive-date=2007-06-20 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
* 19661/070 – 747-121(SF) registration N681UP preserved at a plaza on Jungong Road, Shanghai, China.<ref>{{Cite web |last=R. |first=Stefano |date=July 8, 2017 |title=Boeing 747-121(A/SF) - Untitled Aviation Photo |url=https://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled/Boeing-747-121-A-SF/4522997 |access-date=November 15, 2024 |website=Airliners.net}}</ref>
* 19661/070 – 747-121(SF) registration N681UP preserved at a plaza on Jungong Road, Shanghai, China.{{cn|date=May 2026}}
* 19896/072 – 747-132(SF) registration N481EV at the [[Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum]], McMinnville, Oregon, US.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 25, 2013 |title=Artifact Pick of the Week – Boeing 747 |url=https://www.evergreenmuseum.org/artifact-pick-of-the-week-boeing-747 |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=Evergreen Air & Space Museum |archive-date=May 17, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210517171255/https://www.evergreenmuseum.org/artifact-pick-of-the-week-boeing-747 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=FAA Registry: Aircraft Inquiry: N-481EV |url=https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N481EV |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=FAA}}</ref>
* 19896/072 – 747-132(SF) registration N481EV at the [[Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum]], McMinnville, Oregon, US.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 25, 2013 |title=Artifact Pick of the Week – Boeing 747 |url=https://www.evergreenmuseum.org/artifact-pick-of-the-week-boeing-747 |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=Evergreen Air & Space Museum |archive-date=May 17, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210517171255/https://www.evergreenmuseum.org/artifact-pick-of-the-week-boeing-747 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=FAA Registry: Aircraft Inquiry: N-481EV |url=https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N481EV |access-date=November 30, 2020 |publisher=FAA}}</ref>
* 20107/086 – 747-123 registration N905NA, a NASA Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, at the [[Johnson Space Center]], Houston, Texas, US.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://flightaware.com/resources/registration/N905NA|title=N905NA (1970 Boeing 747-123 owned by National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Aircraft Registration|website=FlightAware}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.space-travel.com/reports/Shuttle_replica_lifted_and_put_on_top_of_747_carrier_999.html|title=Shuttle replica lifted and put on top of 747 carrier|website=space-travel.com}}</ref>
* 20107/086 – 747-123 registration N905NA, a NASA Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, at the [[Johnson Space Center]], Houston, Texas, US.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://flightaware.com/resources/registration/N905NA|title=N905NA (1970 Boeing 747-123 owned by National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Aircraft Registration|website=FlightAware}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.space-travel.com/reports/Shuttle_replica_lifted_and_put_on_top_of_747_carrier_999.html|title=Shuttle replica lifted and put on top of 747 carrier|website=space-travel.com}}</ref>
Line 591: Line 758:
* 20770/213 – 747-2B5B registration HL7463 at [[Jeongseok Airport|Jeongseok Aviation Center]], Jeju, South Korea.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thebluesky.info/44 |title=제주도 하이킹 여행기 9 : 정석항공관, 산굼부리 |trans-title=Jeju Island Hiking Travelogue 9: Jeongseok Aviation Museum, Sangumburi |website=The Blue Sky |id=Article #44 |location=Korea |language=Korean |date=2003-06-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722000639/http://thebluesky.info/44 |archive-date=2011-07-22}}</ref>
* 20770/213 – 747-2B5B registration HL7463 at [[Jeongseok Airport|Jeongseok Aviation Center]], Jeju, South Korea.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thebluesky.info/44 |title=제주도 하이킹 여행기 9 : 정석항공관, 산굼부리 |trans-title=Jeju Island Hiking Travelogue 9: Jeongseok Aviation Museum, Sangumburi |website=The Blue Sky |id=Article #44 |location=Korea |language=Korean |date=2003-06-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722000639/http://thebluesky.info/44 |archive-date=2011-07-22}}</ref>
* 20713/219 - 747-212B(SF) registration N482EV at the [[Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum]], McMinnville, Oregon, US.<ref>{{Cite web |title=This is indeed a full-sized Boeing 747 passenger plane atop the Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum in McMinnville, Oregon |url=https://www.loc.gov/item/2018698837/ |date=2018-05-19 |access-date=2025-06-22 |website=Library of Congress |location=US}}</ref>
* 20713/219 - 747-212B(SF) registration N482EV at the [[Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum]], McMinnville, Oregon, US.<ref>{{Cite web |title=This is indeed a full-sized Boeing 747 passenger plane atop the Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum in McMinnville, Oregon |url=https://www.loc.gov/item/2018698837/ |date=2018-05-19 |access-date=2025-06-22 |website=Library of Congress |location=US}}</ref>
* 20781/221 – 747SR-46 registration N911NA, originally built as the first 747SR for Japan Airlines as JA8117, and later converted into a NASA Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, at [[Joe Davies Heritage Airpark]], California, US.<ref>{{Cite web |title=N911NA (1973 747-SR-46 owned by National Aeronautics And Space Administration) Aircraft Registration |url=http://www.flightaware.com/resources/registration/N911NA |access-date=2025-09-18 |website=FlightAware |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 911's Final Journey - NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/shuttle-carrier-aircraft-911s-final-journey-2/ |access-date=2025-09-18 |language=en-US}}</ref>
* 20825/223 - 747-200 registration SX-OAB at the site of [[Ellinikon International Airport]], [[Athens]], Greece. After over 20 years sitting at the closed airport, it was moved to a permanent location within the boundaries of the airport and put on display as part of the ongoing regeneration work.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kokkinidis |first=Tasos |date=2024-02-23 |title=Aristotle Onassis' Historic Olympic Airways Plane Displayed in Athens |url=https://greekreporter.com/2024/02/23/aristotle-onassis-olympic-airways-plane-displayed-athens/ |access-date=2024-04-11 |website=Greek Reporter}}</ref>
* 20825/223 - 747-200 registration SX-OAB at the site of [[Ellinikon International Airport]], [[Athens]], Greece. After over 20 years sitting at the closed airport, it was moved to a permanent location within the boundaries of the airport and put on display as part of the ongoing regeneration work.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kokkinidis |first=Tasos |date=2024-02-23 |title=Aristotle Onassis' Historic Olympic Airways Plane Displayed in Athens |url=https://greekreporter.com/2024/02/23/aristotle-onassis-olympic-airways-plane-displayed-athens/ |access-date=2024-04-11 |website=Greek Reporter}}</ref>
* 21134/288 – 747SP-44 registration ZS-SPC at the [[South African Airways Museum Society]], Rand Airport, Johannesburg, South Africa.<ref>{{Cite web |title="Maluti": Boeing 747SP-44 |url=http://www.saamuseum.co.za/our-aircraft/65.html |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=SAA Museum Society}}</ref>
* 21134/288 – 747SP-44 registration ZS-SPC at the [[South African Airways Museum Society]], Rand Airport, Johannesburg, South Africa.<ref>{{Cite web |title="Maluti": Boeing 747SP-44 |url=http://www.saamuseum.co.za/our-aircraft/65.html |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=SAA Museum Society}}</ref>
* 21549/336 – 747-206B registration PH-BUK at the [[Aviodrome]], Lelystad, Netherlands.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet |url=https://www.aviodrome.nl/collectie/boeing-747/ |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=Luchvaart Museum Aviodrome |language=nl}}</ref>
* 21549/336 – 747-206B registration PH-BUK at the [[Aviodrome]], Lelystad, Netherlands.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet |url=https://www.aviodrome.nl/collectie/boeing-747/ |access-date=November 30, 2020 |website=Luchvaart Museum Aviodrome |language=nl}}</ref>
* 21588/342 – 747-230B(M) registration D-ABYM preserved at [[Technik Museum Speyer]], Germany.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.airhistory.net/photo/754240/D-ABYM |access-date=March 10, 2025 |website=Airhistory.net |title=Aircraft Photo of D-ABYM &#124; Boeing 747-230BM &#124; Lufthansa &#124; AirHistory.net #754240 }}</ref>
* 21588/342 – 747-230B(M) registration D-ABYM preserved at [[Technik Museum Speyer]], Germany.{{cn|date=April 2026}}
* 22145/410 – 747-238B registration VH-EBQ at the [[Qantas Founders Outback Museum]], Longreach, Queensland, Australia.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Museum |url=https://qfom.com.au/about/the-museum/ |access-date=December 1, 2020 |website=Qantas Founders Museum |archive-date=January 22, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122232321/https://qfom.com.au/about/the-museum/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* 22145/410 – 747-238B registration VH-EBQ at the [[Qantas Founders Outback Museum]], Longreach, Queensland, Australia.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Museum |url=https://qfom.com.au/about/the-museum/ |access-date=December 1, 2020 |website=Qantas Founders Museum |archive-date=January 22, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122232321/https://qfom.com.au/about/the-museum/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* 21942/471 – 747-212B registration N642NW nose at the [[Museum of Aeronautical Science]] in [[Narita, Chiba|Narita]], Japan, near [[Narita International Airport]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kobayashi |first=Shinobu |date=15 April 2012 |title=Preserving a Boeing 747 nose |url=https://www.aero.or.jp/web-koku-to-bunka/2012_04_15_kobayashi/2012_04_15_kobayashi-1.html |access-date=2024-11-25 |website=www.aero.or.jp |language=ja}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=航空科学博物館でB747-200型の一般公開がはじまる {{!}} FlyTeam ニュース |url=https://flyteam.jp/news/article/4054 |access-date=2024-11-25 |website=FlyTeam(フライチーム) |language=ja}}</ref>
* 21942/471 – 747-212B registration N642NW nose at the [[Museum of Aeronautical Science]] in [[Narita, Chiba|Narita]], Japan, near [[Narita International Airport]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kobayashi |first=Shinobu |date=15 April 2012 |title=Preserving a Boeing 747 nose |url=https://www.aero.or.jp/web-koku-to-bunka/2012_04_15_kobayashi/2012_04_15_kobayashi-1.html |access-date=2024-11-25 |website=Japan Aeronautical Association |language=ja}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=航空科学博物館でB747-200型の一般公開がはじまる |trans-title=The B747-200 will be on public display at the Aviation Science Museum |url=https://flyteam.jp/news/article/4054 |date=2011-08-04 |access-date=2024-11-25 |author=<!--staff--> |website=FlyTeam(フライチーム) |language=ja}}</ref>
* 22455/515 – 747-256BM registration EC-DLD ''Lope de Vega'' nose at the [[National Museum of Science and Technology (Spain)|National Museum of Science and Technology]], A Coruña, Spain.
* 22382/498 – 747-2F6B(SF) registration TF-ARN on display as an attraction at the Donghai Cloud Corridor in [[Dinghai, Zhoushan]], Zhejiang, China. Formerly operated by [[Philippine Airlines]] and [[Air Atlanta Icelandic]].{{sfn|Minton|1991|page=101}}<ref>{{cite news |url=https://tidenews.com.cn/news.html?id=2553232 |title=咋回事?一架波音747停在了舟山的一处山顶上! |trans-title=What's going on? A Boeing 747 has landed on a mountaintop in Zhoushan! |language=zh |last=Tang |first=XuFeng |publisher=Tide News |location=China |date=15 August 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://luxurylaunches.com/other_stuff/kuala-lumpur-airport-abandoned-boeing-747-12062025.php |title=Someone forgot not one or two but three Boeing 747 jumbo jets at Kuala Lumpur Airport, and after years of racking millions in parking bills the gigantic planes were sold and spectacularly transformed into a surreal Chinese classroom and a Coach handbag store.|last=Chakravarty |first=Sayan |publisher=Luxurylaunches |date=6 December 2025}}</ref>
* 22455/515 – 747-256BM registration EC-DLD ''Lope de Vega'' nose at the [[National Museum of Science and Technology (Spain)|National Museum of Science and Technology]], A Coruña, Spain.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.microsiervos.com/archivo/aerotrastorno/b-747-para-museo-nacional-ciencia-tecnologia.html|title=Un B747 para el Museo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología|lang=Spanish|website=microsiervos|date=2009-04-07|access-date=2024-11-05}}</ref>
* 23719/696 – 747-451 registration [[N661US]] at the [[Delta Flight Museum]], Atlanta, Georgia, US. This particular plane was the first {{not a typo|747-400}} in service, as well as the prototype.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Kruse |first=Brian |date=May 2, 2016 |title=Retired 747-400 takes road trip home to Flight Museum |url=http://news.delta.com/retired-747-400-takes-road-trip-home-flight-museum |access-date=November 29, 2016 |website=Delta News Hub |publisher=Delta Air Lines, Inc.}}</ref>
* 23719/696 – 747-451 registration [[N661US]] at the [[Delta Flight Museum]], Atlanta, Georgia, US. This particular plane was the first {{not a typo|747-400}} in service, as well as the prototype.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Kruse |first=Brian |date=May 2, 2016 |title=Retired 747-400 takes road trip home to Flight Museum |url=http://news.delta.com/retired-747-400-takes-road-trip-home-flight-museum |access-date=November 29, 2016 |website=Delta News Hub |publisher=Delta Air Lines, Inc.}}</ref>
* [[City of Canberra (aircraft)|24354/731]] – 747-438 registration VH-OJA at [[Shellharbour Airport]], Albion Park Rail, New South Wales, Australia.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747-438 "VH-OJA, City of Canberra" |url=https://hars.org.au/boeing-747-438-longreach/ |access-date=December 1, 2020 |publisher=HARS Aviation Museum}}</ref>
* [[City of Canberra (aircraft)|24354/731]] – 747-438 registration VH-OJA at [[Shellharbour Airport]], Albion Park Rail, New South Wales, Australia.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747-438 "VH-OJA, City of Canberra" |url=https://hars.org.au/boeing-747-438-longreach/ |access-date=December 1, 2020 |publisher=HARS Aviation Museum}}</ref>
* 25811/1018 – 747-436 registration G-CIVB preserved at [[Cotswold Airport]], UK as an event space.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.negus747.com/about |title=Negus and Cotswold Airport |publisher=Events at Cotswold Airport |access-date=23 July 2025}}</ref>
* 25811/1018 – 747-436 registration G-CIVB preserved at [[Cotswold Airport]], UK as an event space.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.negus747.com/about |title=Negus and Cotswold Airport |publisher=Events at Cotswold Airport |access-date=23 July 2025}}</ref>
* 21441/306 - [[Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy|SOFIA]] - 747SP-21 registration N747NA at [[Pima Air and Space Museum]] in [[Tucson, Arizona]], US. Former [[Pan Am]] and [[United Airlines]] 747SP bought by NASA and converted into a flying telescope, for astronomy purposes. Named ''Clipper Lindbergh''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fisher |first=Alise |date=2022-12-08 |title=NASA's Retired SOFIA Aircraft Finds New Home at Arizona Museum |url=http://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-s-retired-sofia-aircraft-finds-new-home-at-arizona-museum |access-date=2022-12-12 |publisher=NASA}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |title=Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy |publisher=NASA |access-date=2023-02-12 |archive-date=August 18, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230818135017/https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* 21441/306 - [[Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy|SOFIA]] - 747SP-21 registration N747NA at [[Pima Air and Space Museum]] in [[Tucson, Arizona]], US. Former [[Pan Am]] and [[United Airlines]] 747SP bought by NASA and converted into a flying telescope, for astronomy purposes. Named ''Clipper Lindbergh''.<ref name="FisherA22">{{Cite web |last=Fisher |first=Alise |date=2022-12-08 |title=NASA's Retired SOFIA Aircraft Finds New Home at Arizona Museum |url=http://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-s-retired-sofia-aircraft-finds-new-home-at-arizona-museum |access-date=2022-12-12 |publisher=NASA}}</ref><ref name="NasaSofia2023">{{Cite web |url=https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |title=Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy |publisher=NASA |access-date=2023-02-12 |archive-date=August 18, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230818135017/https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/380911main_SOFIA_QuickFacts.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>


=== Other uses ===
=== Other uses ===
Line 610: Line 779:
A former British Airways 747-200B, G-BDXJ, is parked at the [[Dunsfold Aerodrome#Film work|Dunsfold Aerodrome]] in Surrey, England and has been used as a movie set for productions such as the 2006 James Bond film, ''[[Casino Royale (2006 film)|Casino Royale]]'' using the fictional registration N88892 and N9747P.<ref>Wastnage, Justin. "[http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pictures-james-bond-casino-royale-modified-boeing-747-xxx-on-show-ahead-of-movie-207684/ James Bond Casino Royale modified Boeing 747-XXX on show ahead of movie première]." ''[[Flight International]]'', August 29, 2006. Retrieved: January 2, 2012.</ref><ref>"[https://web.archive.org/web/20110811125411/http://www.dunsfoldpark.com/images/stories/dunsfoldpark/DPL_Newsletter_Issue_21.pdf 747 is 'Airbourne<!--sic-->']". Dunsfold Park, March 2011. Retrieved January 2, 2012.</ref> The airplane also appears frequently in the television series ''[[Top Gear (2002 TV series)|Top Gear]]'', which is filmed at Dunsfold.
A former British Airways 747-200B, G-BDXJ, is parked at the [[Dunsfold Aerodrome#Film work|Dunsfold Aerodrome]] in Surrey, England and has been used as a movie set for productions such as the 2006 James Bond film, ''[[Casino Royale (2006 film)|Casino Royale]]'' using the fictional registration N88892 and N9747P.<ref>Wastnage, Justin. "[http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pictures-james-bond-casino-royale-modified-boeing-747-xxx-on-show-ahead-of-movie-207684/ James Bond Casino Royale modified Boeing 747-XXX on show ahead of movie première]." ''[[Flight International]]'', August 29, 2006. Retrieved: January 2, 2012.</ref><ref>"[https://web.archive.org/web/20110811125411/http://www.dunsfoldpark.com/images/stories/dunsfoldpark/DPL_Newsletter_Issue_21.pdf 747 is 'Airbourne<!--sic-->']". Dunsfold Park, March 2011. Retrieved January 2, 2012.</ref> The airplane also appears frequently in the television series ''[[Top Gear (2002 TV series)|Top Gear]]'', which is filmed at Dunsfold.


The ''[[Jumbo Stay]]'' hostel, using a converted 747-200 formerly operated by [[Singapore Airlines]] and registered as 9V-SQE, opened at Arlanda Airport, Stockholm in January 2009.<ref name="Jumbo">[http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7740000/newsid_7741700/7741777.stm?bw=bb&mp=wm&news=1&bbcws=1 "Swedish Hotel Fashioned From An Old Jumbo Jet"] Tayfun King, ''Fast Track, [[BBC World News]]'' (November 23, 2008)</ref><ref>Finighan, Adrian. [https://money.cnn.com/video/news/2009/02/11/money.jumbohostel.021109.cnnmoney/ "Jumbo Jet Hostel"] [[CNN Money]] (February 11, 2009)</ref> It closed in March 2025 after the owner declared bankruptcy.<ref name="JumboStayBankruptcy">{{cite news |title=Iconic Jumbo Stay 747 hotel at Stockholm Arlanda declares bankruptcy, may be sold for scrap |url=https://www.aviation24.be/airports/stockholm-arlanda-arn/iconic-jumbo-stay-747-hotel-at-stockholm-arlanda-declares-bankruptcy-may-be-sold-for-scrap/ |first=Bart |last=Noëth |website=Aviation24 |location=Belgium |date=22 March 2025 |accessdate=5 April 2025}}</ref>
The ''[[Jumbo Stay]]'' hostel, using a converted 747-200 formerly operated by [[Singapore Airlines]] and registered as 9V-SQE, opened at Arlanda Airport, Stockholm in January 2009.<ref name="Jumbo">[https://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7740000/newsid_7741700/7741777.stm?bw=bb&mp=wm&news=1&bbcws=1 "Swedish Hotel Fashioned From An Old Jumbo Jet"] Tayfun King, ''Fast Track, [[BBC World News]]'' (November 23, 2008)</ref><ref>Finighan, Adrian. [https://web.archive.org/web/20110605103606/http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2009/02/11/money.jumbohostel.021109.cnnmoney/ "Jumbo Jet Hostel"] [[CNN Money]] (February 11, 2009)</ref> It closed in March 2025 after the owner declared bankruptcy.<ref name="JumboStayBankruptcy">{{cite news |title=Iconic Jumbo Stay 747 hotel at Stockholm Arlanda declares bankruptcy, may be sold for scrap |url=https://www.aviation24.be/airports/stockholm-arlanda-arn/iconic-jumbo-stay-747-hotel-at-stockholm-arlanda-declares-bankruptcy-may-be-sold-for-scrap/ |first=Bart |last=Noëth |website=Aviation24 |location=Belgium |date=22 March 2025 |accessdate=5 April 2025}}</ref>


A former [[Pakistan International Airlines]] 747-300 was converted into a restaurant by Pakistan's [[Airports Security Force]] in 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 31, 2017 |title=Old PIA plane takes new flight as airport security turns it into restaurant: reports |url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1336540 |access-date=October 8, 2020 |website=Dawn.com |language=en}}</ref> It is located at Jinnah International Airport, Karachi.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 3, 2017 |title=ASF says its PIA jumbo jet 'restaurant' actually an officers' mess |url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/1426464/asf-says-pia-jumbo-jet-restaurant-actually-officers-mess |access-date=October 8, 2020 |website=The Express Tribune |language=en}}</ref>
A former [[Pakistan International Airlines]] 747-300 was converted into a restaurant by Pakistan's [[Airports Security Force]] in 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 31, 2017 |title=Old PIA plane takes new flight as airport security turns it into restaurant: reports |url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1336540 |access-date=October 8, 2020 |website=Dawn.com |language=en}}</ref> It is located at Jinnah International Airport, Karachi.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 3, 2017 |title=ASF says its PIA jumbo jet 'restaurant' actually an officers' mess |url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/1426464/asf-says-pia-jumbo-jet-restaurant-actually-officers-mess |access-date=October 8, 2020 |website=The Express Tribune |language=en}}</ref>
Line 618: Line 787:
In 2023, a Boeing 747-412, retired from Lion Air, was turned into a steak restaurant in [[Bekasi]], Indonesia. The aircraft had been sitting since 2018 but the construction of the restaurant was delayed due to the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pesawat SMB |url=https://steak21.id/lokasi/pesawat_smb |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=Steak 21 |location=Indonesia}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=First and largest private jet restaurant in Indonesia |url=https://www.antarafoto.com/view/2145054/restoran-private-jet-pertama-dan-terbesar-di-indonesia |date=2024-01-31 |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=Antara Foto |location=Indonesia}}</ref>
In 2023, a Boeing 747-412, retired from Lion Air, was turned into a steak restaurant in [[Bekasi]], Indonesia. The aircraft had been sitting since 2018 but the construction of the restaurant was delayed due to the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pesawat SMB |url=https://steak21.id/lokasi/pesawat_smb |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=Steak 21 |location=Indonesia}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=First and largest private jet restaurant in Indonesia |url=https://www.antarafoto.com/view/2145054/restoran-private-jet-pertama-dan-terbesar-di-indonesia |date=2024-01-31 |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=Antara Foto |location=Indonesia}}</ref>


Two used 747-400s were cannibalized to build the [[Scaled Composites Stratolaunch]] aircraft.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-06-01 |title=Paul Allen's Stratolaunch Emerges from Hangar for Fueling Tests |url=https://www.flyingmag.com/paul-allens-stratolaunch-emerges-from-hangar-for-fueling-tests/ |access-date=2025-07-02 |website=www.flyingmag.com |language=en-US}}</ref>
Two used 747-400s were cannibalized to build the [[Scaled Composites Stratolaunch]] aircraft.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Paul Allen's Stratolaunch Emerges from Hangar for Fueling Tests |url=https://www.flyingmag.com/paul-allens-stratolaunch-emerges-from-hangar-for-fueling-tests/ |first=Ashley |last=Burns |website=Flying Magazine |location=US |date=2017-06-01 |access-date=2025-07-02}}</ref>


== Specifications ==
== Specifications (Boeing 747-200B, with JT9D-7R4G2 engines) ==
{{Overly detailed|section|nosplit=1|details=per [[WP:AIRMOS]], this section should cover the specifications of only a single variant|date=June 2025}}
[[File:B747FAMILYv1.0.png|thumb|upright=1|Diagram of Boeing 747 variants. <br />At the top: 747-100 (dorsal, cross-section, and front views). Side views, in descending order: 747SP, {{not a typo|747-100}}, {{not a typo|747-400}}, 747-8I, and 747LCF.|alt=A comparison of the different 747 variants]]
[[File:B747FAMILYv1.0.png|thumb|upright=1|Diagram of Boeing 747 variants. <br />At the top: 747-100 (dorsal, cross-section, and front views). Side views, in descending order: 747SP, {{not a typo|747-100}}, {{not a typo|747-400}}, 747-8I, and 747LCF.|alt=A comparison of the different 747 variants]]


{{sticky header}}
{{Aircraft specs
{| class="wikitable sortable sticky-header" style="text-align:center"
|ref=<ref name="100/200/300startup" /><ref name="TypeCert">{{Cite web |date=February 27, 2015 |title=Type Certificate Data Sheet NO. A20WE |url=http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/75d4c3215c58345386257df9007c3763/$FILE/A20WE_Rev_57.pdf |publisher=FAA |access-date=September 12, 2016 |archive-date=December 25, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161225060633/http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/75d4c3215c58345386257df9007c3763/$FILE/A20WE_Rev_57.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
|-
|prime units?=imp
! Model
<!--
! [[Boeing 747SP|747SP]]<ref name="100/200/300startup">{{Cite web |date=2007 |title=747-100/-200/-300/-SP |url=http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/startup/pdf/historical/747-100_-200_-300_-SP_passenger.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/startup/pdf/historical/747-100_-200_-300_-SP_passenger.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |website=Startup |publisher=Boeing}}</ref>
        General characteristics
! 747-100<ref name="100/200/300startup" />
-->
! 747-200B<ref name="100/200/300startup" />
|genhide=
! 747-300<ref name="100/200/300startup" />
 
! [[747-400]]<ref name="400startup">{{Cite web |date=May 2010 |title=747-400 |url=http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/startup/pdf/historical/747-400-passenger.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/startup/pdf/historical/747-400-passenger.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |website=Startup |publisher=Boeing}}</ref>
|crew=3
! [[Boeing 747-8|747-8]]<ref name="acaps747-8">{{Cite web |date=December 2012 |title=747-8 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning |url=http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_8.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_8.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |publisher=Boeing}}</ref>
|capacity=366 passengers, 5 cargo pallets, and 14 cargo containers ({{cvt|6190|cuft|m3}} total cargo space)
|-
|length m=68.6
! Cockpit crew
|length ft=225
| colspan=4 | Three (captain, first officer, [[flight engineer]])
|length in=2
| colspan=2 | Two (captain, first officer)
|length note=
|-
|span m=59.6
! Typical seats
|span ft=195
| 276 (25F, 57J, 194Y)
|span in=8
| colspan=2 | 366 (32F, 74J, 260Y)
|span note=
| 400 (34F, 76J, 290Y)
|width m=
| 416 (23F, 78J, 315Y)
|width ft=
| 467 (24F, {{#expr:50+37}}J, 356Y)
|width in=
|-
|width note=
! Exit&nbsp;limit{{efn|split numbers denote different limits depending on exit types installed}}<ref name="TypeCert">{{Cite web |date=February 27, 2015 |title=Type Certificate Data Sheet NO. A20WE |url=http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/75d4c3215c58345386257df9007c3763/$FILE/A20WE_Rev_57.pdf |publisher=FAA |access-date=September 12, 2016 |archive-date=December 25, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161225060633/http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/75d4c3215c58345386257df9007c3763/$FILE/A20WE_Rev_57.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
|height m=19.6
| 400
|height ft=64
| colspan=2 | 440/550
|height in=3
| colspan=2 | 550/660
|height note=with landing gear extended
| 495/605
|wing area sqm=
|-
|wing area sqft=
! Cargo
|wing area note=
| {{cvt|{{#expr:3500+400}}|ft3|m3|abbr=on}}
|airfoil=
| colspan="3" | {{cvt|6190|ft3|m3|abbr=on}}, 30×[[Unit load device|LD1]]
|empty weight kg=
| {{cvt|5655|ft3|m3|1|abbr=on}}
|empty weight lb=375100
| {{cvt|{{#expr:5705+640}}|ft3|m3|abbr=on}}
|empty weight note=
|-
|gross weight kg=
<!--Dimensions-->
|gross weight lb=
! Length
|gross weight note=
| {{cvt|184|ft|9|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
|max takeoff weight kg=
| colspan="4" | {{cvt|231|ft|10|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
|max takeoff weight lb=833000
| 250&nbsp;ft&nbsp;2&nbsp;in (76.25&nbsp;m)
|max takeoff weight note=
|-
|fuel capacity={{cvt|53985|U.S.gal|L}}
! Cabin width
|more general=
| colspan="6" | {{cvt|{{#expr:(54+24.75)*2+82}}|in|m|abbr=on}}<ref name=400startup />
*'''Max landing weight:''' {{cvt|564000|lb|kg}}
|-
*'''Max zero fuel weight:''' {{cvt|526500|lb|kg}}
! Wingspan
<!--
| colspan="4" | {{cvt|195|ft|8|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
        Powerplant
| {{cvt|211|ft|5|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
-->
| {{cvt|224|ft|7|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
|eng1 number=4
|-
|eng1 name=[[Pratt & Whitney JT9D|Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4G2]]
! Wing area
|eng1 type=[[high bypass]] [[turbofan]]
| colspan="4" | {{cvt|511|m2|ft2|order=flip|abbr=on}}
|eng1 kn=
| {{cvt|525|m2|ft2|order=flip|abbr=on}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 13, 2011 |title=Premiere of Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental |url=http://konzern.lufthansa.com/en/themen/boeing-747-8-roll-out.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230173833/http://konzern.lufthansa.com/en/themen/boeing-747-8-roll-out.html |archive-date=December 30, 2012 |publisher=Lufthansa}}</ref>
|eng1 lbf=54750
| {{cvt|554|m2|order=flip|abbr=on}}<ref name="FlightDesc747-8">{{Cite news |date=November 13, 2012 |title=Boeing 747-8 technical description & cutaway |work=Flight Global |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/in-focus-boeing-747-8-technical-description-and-cutaway/107801.article/}}</ref>
|eng1 note=
|-
|thrust original=
! Wing sweep
<!--
| colspan=6 | 37.5°<ref name="Centennial">{{Cite book |last=Martin Bowman |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ej0RBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT670 |title=Boeing 747: A History |date=2014 |publisher=Pen and Sword |isbn=978-1-4738-3823-9}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=January 2005 |title=Statistical Data for the Boeing-747-400 Aircraft in Commercial Operations |url=http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar04-44.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar04-44.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |publisher=FAA}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=September 4, 1991 |title=Commercial aircraft of the world |work=Flight International |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1991/1991%20-%202350.PDF |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1991/1991%20-%202350.PDF |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref>
        Performance
|-
-->
! Aspect ratio
|perfhide=
| colspan=4 | {{#expr:59.6/(511/59.6)round1}}
 
| {{#expr:64.4/(525/64.4)round1}}
|max speed kmh=
| {{#expr:68.5/(554/68.5)round1}}
|max speed mph=
|-
|max speed kts=
! Tail height
|max speed note=
| {{cvt|65|ft|5|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
|max speed mach=0.92
| colspan="3" | {{cvt|63|ft|5|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
|cruise speed kmh=
| {{cvt|63|ft|8|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
|cruise speed mph=
| {{cvt|63|ft|6|in|m|1|abbr=on}}
|cruise speed kts=
|-
|cruise speed note=
<!--Weights-->
|stall speed kmh=
! [[Maximum takeoff weight|MTOW]]<ref name="acap_123sp">{{Cite web |date=May 2011 |title=Boeing 747-100/-200/-300/-SP ACAPS |url=https://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_123sp.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/747_123sp.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |website=Boeing Airplanes}}</ref>
|stall speed mph=
| {{cvt|630000-696000|lb|t|1|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|stall speed kts=
| {{cvt|735000-750000|lb|t|1|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|stall speed note=
| colspan="2" | {{cvt|775000-833000|lb|t|1|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|never exceed speed kmh=
| {{cvt|875000-910000|lb|t|1|disp=br()|abbr=on}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 2011 |title=Boeing 747-400/-400ER ACAPS |url=https://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/commercial/airports/acaps/747_4.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/commercial/airports/acaps/747_4.pdf |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |url-status=live |website=Boeing Airplanes Co.}}</ref>
|never exceed speed mph=
| 975,000–987,000 lb<br/>442.3–447.7 t
|never exceed speed kts=
|-
|never exceed speed note=
! [[Operating empty weight|OEW]]<ref name="acap_123sp" />
|minimum control speed kmh=
| {{cvt|325660-336870|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|minimum control speed mph=
| {{cvt|358000-381480|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|minimum control speed kts=
| {{cvt|376170-388010|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|minimum control speed note=
| {{cvt|384240-402700|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|range km=
| {{cvt|394088-412300|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|range miles=
| {{cvt|485300|lb|t|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|range nmi=6560
|-
|range note=
! Fuel<br />capacity<ref name="acap_123sp" />
|endurance=
| {{cvt|48,780-50,360|USgal|L|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|ceiling m=
| {{cvt|47,210-48,445|USgal|L|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|ceiling ft=
| colspan="2" | {{cvt|52,035-52,410|USgal|L|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|ceiling note=
| {{cvt|53,985-63,705|USgal|L|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|climb rate ms=
| {{cvt|63,034|USgal|L|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|climb rate ftmin=
|-
|climb rate note=
<!--Engines-->
|time to altitude=
! [[Turbofan]] (×4)
|lift to drag=
| colspan=4 |[[Pratt & Whitney JT9D]] or [[Rolls-Royce RB211]] or [[General Electric CF6]]
|wing loading kg/m2=
| [[Pratt & Whitney PW4000|PW4000]] / [[GE CF6|CF6]] / [[Rolls-Royce RB211|RB211]]
|wing loading lb/sqft=
| [[General Electric GEnx|GEnx-2B67]]
|wing loading note=
|-
|fuel consumption kg/km=
! Thrust (×4)
|fuel consumption lb/mi=
| {{cvt|46,300-54,750|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|thrust/weight=
| {{cvt|43,500-51,600|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|more performance=
| {{cvt|46,300-54,750|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
*'''Takeoff distance''': {{cvt|10900|ft|m}} at max takeoff weight
| {{cvt|46,300-56,900|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
*'''Landing distance''': {{cvt|6150|ft|m}} at max landing weight
| {{cvt|56,750-63,300|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
 
| {{cvt|66,500|lbf|kN|disp=br()|abbr=on}}
|avionics=
|-
}}
<!--Performance-->
! [[V speeds|MMo]]<ref name="TypeCert" />
| colspan=5 | Mach 0.92
| Mach 0.9
|-
! [[Cruise speed]]
|
| colspan=3 |econ. {{cvt|907|km/h|kn mph|abbr=on}}, max. {{cvt|939|km/h|kn mph|abbr=on}}<ref name="Airliners100/200specs">{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747-100/200 |url=http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/boeing-747-100-200/97 |website=Aircraft Technical Data & Specifications |publisher=Airliners.net}}</ref><ref name="Airliners300specs">{{Cite web |title=Boeing 747-300 |url=http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/boeing-747-300/99 |website=Aircraft Technical Data & Specifications |publisher=Airliners.net}}</ref>
| colspan=2 | {{cvt|0.855|Mach|altitude_ft=32,000|knots km/h mph|0}}
|-
! Range
| {{cvt|5830|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|JT9D, 276 passengers}}
| {{cvt|4620|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|name=100/200range|JT9D, 366 passengers and baggage}}
| {{cvt|6560|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|name=100/200range}}
| {{cvt|6330|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|400 passengers and baggage}}
| {{cvt|7285-7670|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|name=400range|PW4000, 416 passengers and baggage}}
| {{cvt|7730|nmi|disp=br()|abbr=on}}{{efn|410 passengers and baggage}}<ref name="RangeRev">{{Cite news |date=August 3, 2015 |title=Boeing revises "obsolete" performance assumptions |work=FlightGlobal |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/boeing-revises-obsolete-performance-assumptions-415293/}}</ref>
|-
! Takeoff
| {{cvt|9,250|ft|m|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|10650|ft|m|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|10900|ft|m|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|10900|ft|m|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|10700|ft|m|abbr=on}}
| {{cvt|10200|ft|m|abbr=on}}
|}
{{notelist}}


== Cultural impact ==
== Cultural impact ==
Line 763: Line 904:


Appearing in over 300 film productions,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Category:Boeing 747 |url=http://www.impdb.org/index.php?title=Category:Boeing_747 |access-date=April 1, 2015 |website=impdb.org}}</ref> the 747 is one of the most widely depicted civilian aircraft and is considered by many as one of the most iconic in film history.<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 6, 2013 |title=The most iconic aircraft in film history |url=http://www.chapman-freeborn.com/blog/the-most-iconic-aircraft-in-film-history/ |access-date=April 1, 2015 |website=chapman-freeborn.com}}</ref> It has appeared in film productions such as the disaster films ''[[Airport 1975]]'' and ''[[Airport '77]]'', as well as ''[[Air Force One (film)|Air Force One]]'', ''[[Die Hard 2]]'', and ''[[Executive Decision]]''.<ref>[http://www.ram.org/ramblings/movies/executive_decision.html "Executive Decision"]. ''Movie Ramblings''. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref><ref>[http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/air_force_one/ "Air Force One"]. Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref>
Appearing in over 300 film productions,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Category:Boeing 747 |url=http://www.impdb.org/index.php?title=Category:Boeing_747 |access-date=April 1, 2015 |website=impdb.org}}</ref> the 747 is one of the most widely depicted civilian aircraft and is considered by many as one of the most iconic in film history.<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 6, 2013 |title=The most iconic aircraft in film history |url=http://www.chapman-freeborn.com/blog/the-most-iconic-aircraft-in-film-history/ |access-date=April 1, 2015 |website=chapman-freeborn.com}}</ref> It has appeared in film productions such as the disaster films ''[[Airport 1975]]'' and ''[[Airport '77]]'', as well as ''[[Air Force One (film)|Air Force One]]'', ''[[Die Hard 2]]'', and ''[[Executive Decision]]''.<ref>[http://www.ram.org/ramblings/movies/executive_decision.html "Executive Decision"]. ''Movie Ramblings''. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref><ref>[http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/air_force_one/ "Air Force One"]. Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.</ref>
Beyond its media presence, the 747's interior configuration introduced a physical social hierarchy within commercial aviation. With an increased seating capacity on the lower deck, ticket prices decreased and made long-haul travel more accessible.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Spaeth|first=Andreas|date=October 16, 2025|title=Boeing 747: Queen of the Skies|url=https://aeroreport.de/en/good-to-know/boeing-747-queen-of-the-skies}}</ref> The upper deck promoted luxury, featuring sofas, bars, and premium amenities that began the formalization of the modern business and first-class cabin.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Boeing 747: The plane that shrank the world |url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20180927-the-boeing-747-the-plane-that-shrank-the-world |first=Stephen |last=Dowling |website=BBC |location=UK |date=2020-06-19 |access-date=2026-05-01}}</ref> This separation of classes established a precedent for class differentiation in the wide-body aircraft design.{{cn|date=May 2026}}


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 777: Line 920:
|similar aircraft=<!-- aircraft that are of similar role, era, and capability as this design: -->
|similar aircraft=<!-- aircraft that are of similar role, era, and capability as this design: -->
|lists=<!-- relevant lists that this aircraft appears in: -->
|lists=<!-- relevant lists that this aircraft appears in: -->
* [[List of tanker aircraft]]
* [[List of aircraft]]
* [[List of aircraft]]
* [[List of jet airliners]]
* [[List of jet airliners]]
Line 791: Line 935:
* Davies, R.E.G. ''Delta: An Airline and Its Aircraft: The Illustrated History of a Major U.S. Airline and the People Who Made It.'' McLean, VA: Paladwr Press, 1990. {{ISBN|0-9626483-0-2}}.
* Davies, R.E.G. ''Delta: An Airline and Its Aircraft: The Illustrated History of a Major U.S. Airline and the People Who Made It.'' McLean, VA: Paladwr Press, 1990. {{ISBN|0-9626483-0-2}}.
* Donald, David and Lake, Jon. ''Encyclopedia of World Military Aircraft''. London: Aerospace Publishing, 1996. {{ISBN|1-874023-95-6}}.
* Donald, David and Lake, Jon. ''Encyclopedia of World Military Aircraft''. London: Aerospace Publishing, 1996. {{ISBN|1-874023-95-6}}.
* {{cite book |last1=Green |first1=William |last2=Swanborough |first2=Gordon |last3=Mowinski |first3=John |title=Modern Commercial Aircraft|location=London |publisher=Salamander Books Ltd. |year=1987|isbn=0-86101-271-2}}
* Haenggi, Michael. ''Boeing Widebodies.'' St. Paul, MN: MBI Publishing Co., 2003. {{ISBN|0-7603-0842-X}}.
* Haenggi, Michael. ''Boeing Widebodies.'' St. Paul, MN: MBI Publishing Co., 2003. {{ISBN|0-7603-0842-X}}.
* {{cite book |last=Irving |first=Clive |title=Wide Body: The Making of the Boeing 747 |location=Philadelphia |publisher=Coronet |year=1994 |isbn=0-340-59983-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Irving |first=Clive |title=Wide Body: The Making of the Boeing 747 |location=Philadelphia |publisher=Coronet |year=1994 |isbn=0-340-59983-9}}
Line 798: Line 943:
* Kane, Robert M. ''Air Transportation: 1903–2003''. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Co., 2004. {{ISBN|0-7575-3180-6}}.
* Kane, Robert M. ''Air Transportation: 1903–2003''. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Co., 2004. {{ISBN|0-7575-3180-6}}.
* Lawrence, Philip K. and David Weldon Thornton. ''Deep Stall: The Turbulent Story of Boeing Commercial Airplanes''. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2005, {{ISBN|0-7546-4626-2}}.
* Lawrence, Philip K. and David Weldon Thornton. ''Deep Stall: The Turbulent Story of Boeing Commercial Airplanes''. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2005, {{ISBN|0-7546-4626-2}}.
* {{cite book|last=Minton|first=David H.|date=1991|title=The Boeing 747 (Aero Series 40)|location=Fallbrook, CA|publisher=Aero Publishers|isbn=0-8306-3574-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Morton |first=John K.|title=Jetliner Glory: Airliner Liveries|location=Osceola, Wisconsin |publisher=Motorbooks International |year=1997 |isbn=0-7603-0515-3}}
* {{cite book |last1=Norris |first1=Guy |last2=Wagner |first2=Mark |title=Boeing 747: Design and Development Since 1969 |location=St. Paul, Minnesota |publisher=MBI Publishing Co. |year=1997 |isbn=0-7603-0280-4}}
* {{cite book |last1=Norris |first1=Guy |last2=Wagner |first2=Mark |title=Boeing 747: Design and Development Since 1969 |location=St. Paul, Minnesota |publisher=MBI Publishing Co. |year=1997 |isbn=0-7603-0280-4}}
* Norton, Bill. ''Lockheed Martin C-5 Galaxy''. North Branch, MN: Specialty Press, 2003. {{ISBN|1-58007-061-2}}.
* Norton, Bill. ''Lockheed Martin C-5 Galaxy''. North Branch, MN: Specialty Press, 2003. {{ISBN|1-58007-061-2}}.
* Orlebar, Christopher. ''The Concorde Story''. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 5th ed., 2002. {{ISBN|1-85532-667-1}}.
* Orlebar, Christopher. ''The Concorde Story''. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 5th ed., 2002. {{ISBN|1-85532-667-1}}.
* Seo, Hiroshi. ''Boeing 747''. Worthing, West Sussex: Littlehampton Book Services Ltd., 1984. {{ISBN|0-7106-0304-5}}.
* {{cite book |last1=Pealing |first1=Norman |last2=Savage |first2=Mike |title=Jumbo Jetliners: Boeing's 747 and the Widebodies |series=Osprey Color Classics |location=Osceola, Wisconsin |publisher=Motorbooks International |year=1999 |isbn=1-85532-874-7}}
* {{cite book|last=Rosson|first= Lois R.|date=2025|title=SOFIA: The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy|location=Washington, DC|publisher=[[NASA]]|url=https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/sp-4901-sofia.pdf?emrc=949638|isbn=978-1-62683-085-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Seo|first=Hiroshi|date=1984|title=Boeing 747|location=Worthing, West Sussex|publisher=Littlehampton Book Services Ltd.|isbn=0-7106-0304-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Serling|first= Robert J.|date=1992|title=Legend & Legacy: The Story of Boeing and Its People|location=New York|publisher=St. Martin's Press|isbn=031205890X}}
* {{cite book|last=Shaw|first= Robbie|date=1994|title=Boeing 747 (Osprey Civil Aircraft series)|location=London|publisher=Osprey |isbn=1-85532-420-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Sutter |first=Joe |title=747: Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation |location=Washington, District of Columbia |publisher=Smithsonian Books |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-06-088241-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Sutter |first=Joe |title=747: Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation |location=Washington, District of Columbia |publisher=Smithsonian Books |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-06-088241-9}}
* Taylor, John W. R. (editor). ''Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1988–89''. Coulsdon, UK: Jane's Defence Data, 1988. {{ISBN|0-7106-0867-5}}.
* Taylor, John W. R. (editor). ''Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1988–89''. Coulsdon, UK: Jane's Defence Data, 1988. {{ISBN|0-7106-0867-5}}.
Line 809: Line 960:
== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
{{refbegin|40em}}
{{refbegin|40em}}
* Ingells, Douglas J. ''747: Story of the Boeing Super Jet''. Fallbrook, CA: Aero Publishers, 1970. {{ISBN|0-8168-8704-7}}.
* {{cite book |last=Ingells |first=Douglas J. |title=747: Story of the Boeing Super Jet |location=Fallbrook, California |publisher=Aero Publishers |year=1970 |isbn=0-8168-8704-7}}
* ''The Great Gamble: The Boeing 747. The Boeing – Pan Am Project to Develop, Produce, and Introduce the 747''. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1973. {{ISBN|0-8173-8700-5}}.
* {{cite book |last=Kuter |first=Laurence S. |title=The Great Gamble: The Boeing 747. The Boeing – Pan Am Project to Develop, Produce, and Introduce the 747 |location=Tuscaloosa |publisher=University of Alabama Press |year=1973 |isbn=0-8173-8700-5}}
* Lucas, Jim. ''Boeing 747 – The First 20 Years''. Browcom Pub. Ltd, 1988. {{ISBN|0-946141-37-1}}.
* {{cite book |last=Lucas |first=Jim |title=Boeing 747 – The First 20 Years |publisher=Browcom Publishers Ltd |year=1988 |isbn=0-946141-37-1}}
* Wright, Alan J. ''Boeing 747''. Hersham, Surrey: Ian Allan, 1989. {{ISBN|0-7110-1814-6}}.
* {{cite book |last=Wright |first=Alan J. |title=Boeing 747 |location=Hersham, Surrey |publisher=Ian Allan |year=1989 |isbn=0-7110-1814-6}}
* Minton, David H. ''The Boeing 747'' (Aero Series 40). Fallbrook, CA: Aero Publishers, 1991. {{ISBN|0-8306-3574-2}}.
* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=P.R. |title=Boeing 747 |series=Airline Markings |volume=1 |publisher=Airlife |location=Shrewsbury}}
* Shaw, Robbie. ''Boeing 747'' (Osprey Civil Aircraft series). London: Osprey, 1994. {{ISBN|1-85532-420-2}}.
* {{cite book |last=Baum |first=Brian |title=Boeing 747-SP |series=Great Airliners |volume=3 |location=Osceola, Wisconsin |publisher=Motorbooks International |year=1997 |isbn=0-9626730-7-2}}
* Baum, Brian. ''Boeing 747-SP'' (Great Airliners, Vol. 3). Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International, 1997. {{ISBN|0-9626730-7-2}}.
* {{cite book |last=Falconer |first=Jonathan |title=Boeing 747 in Color |location=Hersham, Surrey |publisher=Ian Allan |year=1997 |isbn=1-882663-14-4}}
* Falconer, Jonathan. ''Boeing 747 in Color''. Hersham, Surrey: Ian Allan, 1997. {{ISBN|1-882663-14-4}}.
* {{cite book |last=Gilchrist |first=Peter |title=Boeing 747-400 |series=Airliner Color History |location=Osceola, Wisconson |publisher=Motorbooks International |year=1998 |isbn=0-7603-0616-8}}
* Gilchrist, Peter. ''Boeing 747-400'' (Airliner Color History). Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International, 1998. {{ISBN|0-7603-0616-8}}.
* {{cite book |last=Henderson |first=Scott |title=Boeing 747-100/200 In Camera |location=Minneapolis, Minnesota |publisher=Scoval Publishing |year=1999 |isbn=1-902236-01-7}}
* Henderson, Scott. ''Boeing 747-100/200 In Camera''. Minneapolis, MN: Scoval Publishing, 1999. {{ISBN|1-902236-01-7}}.
* {{cite book |last=Shaw |first=Robbie |title=Boeing 747-400: The Mega-Top |series=Osprey Civil Aircraft |location=London: Osprey |year=1999 |isbn=1-85532-893-3}}
* Pealing, Norman, and Savage, Mike. ''Jumbo Jetliners: Boeing's 747 and the Widebodies'' (Osprey Color Classics). Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International, 1999. {{ISBN|1-85532-874-7}}.
* {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=Stewart |title=Boeing 747 |series=Aviation Notebook |location=Queanbeyan, NSW |publisher=Wilson Media Pty. Ltd |year=1999 |isbn=1-876722-01-0}}
* Shaw, Robbie. ''Boeing 747-400: The Mega-Top'' (Osprey Civil Aircraft series)/ London: Osprey, 1999. {{ISBN|1-85532-893-3}}.
* {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=Stewart |title=Airliners of the World |location=Fyshwick, Australia |publisher=Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd. |year=1999 |isbn=1-875671-44-7}}
* Wilson, Stewart. ''Boeing 747'' (Aviation Notebook Series). Queanbeyan, NSW: Wilson Media Pty. Ltd, 1999. {{ISBN|1-876722-01-0}} .
* {{cite book |last=Birtles |first=Philip |title=Boeing 747-400 |location=Hersham, Surrey |publisher=Ian Allan |year=2000 |isbn=0-7110-2728-5}}
* Wilson, Stewart. ''Airliners of the World''. Fyshwick, Australia: Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd., 1999. {{ISBN|1-875671-44-7}}.
* {{cite book |last=Bowman |first=Martin |title=Boeing 747 |series=Crowood Aviation |location=Marlborough, Wilts |publisher=Crowood |year=2000 |isbn=1-86126-242-6}}
* Birtles, Philip. ''Boeing 747-400''. Hersham, Surrey: Ian Allan, 2000. {{ISBN|0-7110-2728-5}}.
* {{cite book |last=Dorr |first=Robert F. |title=Boeing 747-400 |series=AirlinerTech |volume=10 |location=North Branch, Minnesota |publisher=Specialty Press |year=2000 |isbn=1-58007-055-8}}
* Bowman, Martin. ''Boeing 747'' (Crowood Aviation Series). Marlborough, Wilts.: Crowood, 2000. {{ISBN|1-86126-242-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Gesar |first=Aram |title=Boeing 747: The Jumbo |location=New York |publisher=Pyramid Media Group |year=2000 |isbn=0-944188-02-8}}
* Dorr, Robert F. ''Boeing 747-400'' (AirlinerTech Series, Vol. 10). North Branch, MN: Specialty Press, 2000. {{ISBN|1-58007-055-8}}.
* Gesar, Aram. ''Boeing 747: The Jumbo''. New York: Pyramid Media Group, 2000. {{ISBN|0-944188-02-8}}.
* Gilchrist, Peter. ''Boeing 747 Classic'' (Airliner Color History). Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International, 2000. {{ISBN|0-7603-1007-6}}.
* Gilchrist, Peter. ''Boeing 747 Classic'' (Airliner Color History). Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International, 2000. {{ISBN|0-7603-1007-6}}.
* Graham, Ian. ''In Control: How to Fly a 747''. Somerville, MA: Candlewick, 2000. {{ISBN|0-7636-1278-2}}.
* Graham, Ian. ''In Control: How to Fly a 747''. Somerville, MA: Candlewick, 2000. {{ISBN|0-7636-1278-2}}.
Line 841: Line 990:
* {{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_1yWDoehhE |title=Debut of Boeing 747 |date=October 1, 1968 |publisher=[[British Movietone News]] |at=color – no sound}}
* {{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_1yWDoehhE |title=Debut of Boeing 747 |date=October 1, 1968 |publisher=[[British Movietone News]] |at=color – no sound}}
* {{Cite web |date=April 28, 1969 |title=Photos: Boeing 747-100 Assembly Line In 1969 |url=http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/photos-boeing-747-100-assembly-line-1969 |website=Aviation Week & Space Technology}}
* {{Cite web |date=April 28, 1969 |title=Photos: Boeing 747-100 Assembly Line In 1969 |url=http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/photos-boeing-747-100-assembly-line-1969 |website=Aviation Week & Space Technology}}
* {{Cite magazine |date=June 2005 |title=Aircraft Owner's & Operator's Guide: 747-200/-300 |url=http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111009004335if_/http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=2011-10-09 |magazine=Aircraft commerce }}
* {{Cite magazine |date=June 2005 |title=Aircraft Owner's & Operator's Guide: 747-200/-300 |url=http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111009004335/http://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_articles/sample_articles/owners_guide.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 9, 2011 |magazine=Aircraft commerce |access-date=July 16, 2011 }}
* {{Cite web |date=June 3, 2007 |title=Boeing 747 Aircraft Profile |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/boeing-747-aircraft-profile-216270/ |publisher=[[FlightGlobal]]}}
* {{Cite web |date=June 3, 2007 |title=Boeing 747 Aircraft Profile |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/boeing-747-aircraft-profile-216270/ |publisher=[[FlightGlobal]]}}
* {{Cite web |last=Negroni |first=Christine |date=July 2014 |title=747: The World's Airliner |url=http://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/747-worlds-airliner-180951414/?all&no-ist |website=Air & Space Magazine}}
* {{Cite web |last=Negroni |first=Christine |date=July 2014 |title=747: The World's Airliner |url=http://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/747-worlds-airliner-180951414/?all&no-ist |website=Air & Space Magazine}}
Line 851: Line 1,000:
* {{Cite web |last=Guy |first=Norris |title=Evolution of a Widebody: 50 Years of the Boeing 747 |url=http://aviationweek.com/747 |website=Aviation Week & Space Technology}}
* {{Cite web |last=Guy |first=Norris |title=Evolution of a Widebody: 50 Years of the Boeing 747 |url=http://aviationweek.com/747 |website=Aviation Week & Space Technology}}
* {{cite web |url= https://sites.northwestern.edu/747anniversary/ |title= The 747 Takes Off: The Dawn of the Jumbo Jet Age |work= Digital Exhibit |publisher= Northwestern University Transportation Library |date= January 2020}}
* {{cite web |url= https://sites.northwestern.edu/747anniversary/ |title= The 747 Takes Off: The Dawn of the Jumbo Jet Age |work= Digital Exhibit |publisher= Northwestern University Transportation Library |date= January 2020}}
* {{cite news |url= https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/aircraft-propulsion/how-boeings-747-revolutionized-air-travel |title= How Boeing's 747 Revolutionized Air Travel |author= Jens Flottau |date= January 26, 2023 |work= Aviation Week & Space Technology}}
* {{cite news |url= https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/aircraft-propulsion/how-boeings-747-revolutionized-air-travel |title= How Boeing's 747 Revolutionized Air Travel |first=Jens |last=Flottau |date= January 26, 2023 |work= Aviation Week & Space Technology}}


{{Boeing 747 family}}
{{Boeing 747 family}}
Line 862: Line 1,011:
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Boeing 747|Boeing 747]]
[[Category:Boeing 747| ]]
[[Category:1960s United States airliners]]
[[Category:1960s United States airliners]]
[[Category:Quadjets]]
[[Category:Quadjets]]

Latest revision as of 03:40, 1 June 2026

Template:Featured article Template:Infobox aircraft

The Boeing 747 is a long-range wide-body airliner designed and manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes in the United States between 1968 and 2023. It was conceived in response to the demand of Pan Am for a jet 2+12 times the size of the 707, which had been introduced in October 1958, to reduce the airline's seat cost by 30%. The design team was led by Joe Sutter, who left the 737 development program in 1965 to design the 747. In April 1966, Pan Am ordered 25 Boeing 747-100 aircraft, and in late 1966, Pratt & Whitney agreed to develop the JT9D engine, a high-bypass turbofan. On September 30, 1968, the first 747 was rolled out of the custom-built Everett Plant, the world's largest building by volume. The 747's first flight took place on February 9, 1969, and the 747 was certified in December 1969. It entered service with Pan Am on January 22, 1970. The 747 was the first airplane called a "Jumbo Jet" as the first wide-body airliner.

The 747 is a four-engined jet aircraft, initially powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D turbofan engines, then General Electric CF6 and Rolls-Royce RB211 engines for the original variants. With a ten-abreast economy seating, it typically accommodates 366 passengers in three travel classes. It has a pronounced 37.5° wing sweep, allowing a Mach 0.85 (560 kn; 1,000 km/h)* cruise speed, and its heavy weight is supported by four main landing gear legs, each with a four-wheel bogie. The partial double-deck aircraft was designed with a raised cockpit so it could be converted to a freighter airplane by installing a front cargo door, as it was initially thought that it would eventually be superseded by supersonic transports.

Boeing introduced the 747-200 in 1971, with uprated engines for a heavier maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of 833,000 pounds (378 t) from the initial 735,000 pounds (333 t), increasing the maximum range from 4,620 to 6,560 nautical miles [nmi] (8,560 to 12,150 km; 5,320 to 7,550 mi). It was shortened for the longer-range 747SP in 1976, and the 747-300 followed in 1983 with a stretched upper deck for up to 400 seats in three classes. The heavier 747-400 with improved RB211 and CF6 engines or the new PW4000 engine (the JT9D successor), and a two-crew glass cockpit, was introduced in 1989 and is the most common variant. After several studies, the stretched 747-8 was launched on November 14, 2005, using the General Electric GEnx engine first developed for the 787 Dreamliner (the inspiration for the -8 in the name), and was first delivered in October 2011. The 747 is the basis for several government and military variants, such as the VC-25 (Air Force One), E-4 Emergency Airborne Command Post, Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, and some experimental test aircraft such as the YAL-1 and SOFIA airborne observatory.

Initial competition came from the smaller trijet widebodies: the Lockheed L-1011 (introduced in 1972), McDonnell Douglas DC-10 (1971) and later MD-11 (1990). Airbus competed with later variants with the heaviest versions of the A340 until surpassing the 747 in size with the A380, delivered between 2007 and 2021. These later variants of the 747 also faced internal competition from, and were ultimately superseded by, larger variants of the Boeing 777, such as the 777-300ER[1] and 777-9[2]. Freighter variants of the 747 remain popular with cargo airlines. The final 747 was delivered to Atlas Air in January 2023 after a 54-year production run, with 1,574 aircraft built. As of October 2025, 65 Boeing 747s (4.1%) have been lost in accidents and incidents, in which a total of 3,746 people have died.

Development

Background

A drawing of a Boeing 747 Combi from SAS with cargo on the half of the main deck - 1970's
Cutaway drawing of a Scandinavian Airlines 747-200M Combi showcasing the 747's freight carrying capabilities
File:AirBridgeCargo Airlines Boeing 747-200F nose loading door open and cargo loader at Sheremetyevo International Airport.jpg
Cargo nose door open with cargo loader

In 1963, the United States Air Force (USAF) began a series of study projects on an extremely large strategic transport aircraft. Although the C-141 Starlifter was being introduced, officials believed that a much larger and more capable aircraft was needed, especially to carry cargo that would not fit in any existing aircraft. These studies led to initial requirements for the CX-Heavy Logistics System (CX-HLS) in March 1964 for an aircraft with a load capacity of 180,000 pounds (81.6 t) and a speed of Mach 0.75 (430 kn; 800 km/h), and an unrefueled range of 5,000 nautical miles (9,300 km; 5,800 mi) with a payload of 115,000 pounds (52.2 t). The payload bay had to be 17 feet (5.18 m) wide by 13.5 feet (4.11 m) high and 100 feet (30 m) long with access through doors at the front and rear.[3]

The desire to keep the number of engines to four required new engine designs with greatly increased power and better fuel economy. In May 1964, airframe proposals arrived from Boeing, Douglas, General Dynamics, Lockheed, and Martin Marietta; engine proposals were submitted by General Electric, Curtiss-Wright, and Pratt & Whitney. Boeing, Douglas, and Lockheed were given additional study contracts for the airframe, along with General Electric and Pratt & Whitney for the engines.[3]

The airframe proposals shared several features. As the CX-HLS needed to be able to be loaded from the front, a door had to be included where the cockpit usually was. All of the companies solved this problem by moving the cockpit above the cargo area; Douglas had a small "pod" just forward and above the wing, Lockheed used a long "spine" running the length of the aircraft with the wing spar passing through it, while Boeing blended the two, with a longer pod that ran from just behind the nose to just behind the wing.[4][5] In 1965, Lockheed's aircraft design and General Electric's engine design were selected for the new C-5 Galaxy transport, which was the largest military aircraft in the world at the time.[3] Boeing carried the nose door and raised cockpit concepts over to the design of the 747.[6]

Proposal

The 747 was conceived while air travel was increasing in the 1960s.[7] The era of commercial jet transportation, led by the enormous popularity of the Boeing 707 and Douglas DC-8, had revolutionized long-distance travel.[7][8] In this growing jet age, Juan Trippe, president of Pan American Airways (Pan Am), one of Boeing's most important airline customers, asked for a new jet airliner 2+12 times size of the 707, with a 30% lower cost per unit of passenger-distance and the capability to offer mass air travel on international routes.[9] Trippe also thought that airport congestion could be addressed by a larger aircraft.[10]

A view of an early-production 747 cockpit
An Iran Air 747-200, showing an early-production 747 cockpit with a flight engineer, located on the upper deck

In 1965, Joe Sutter was transferred from Boeing's 737 development team to manage the design studies for the new airliner, already assigned the model number 747.[11] Sutter began a study with Pan Am and other airlines to better understand their requirements. At the time, many thought that long-range subsonic airliners would eventually be superseded by supersonic transport aircraft.[12] Boeing responded by designing the 747 so it could be easily adapted to carry freight and remain in production even if sales of the passenger version declined.[13]

In April 1966, Pan Am ordered 25 Boeing 747-100 aircraft for US$525 million[14][15] (equivalent to $Template:Inflation billion in Template:Inflation-year dollars). During the ceremonial 747 contract-signing banquet in Seattle on Boeing's 50th Anniversary, Juan Trippe predicted that the 747 would be "…a great weapon for peace, competing with intercontinental missiles for mankind's destiny".[16] As launch customer,[17][18] and because of its early involvement before placing a formal order, Pan Am was able to influence the design and development of the 747 to an extent unmatched by a single airline before or since.[19] Once additional orders for the aircraft were filed by Japan Airlines and Lufthansa, approval for production of the 747 was given in July 1966.[20]

Initial design

Ultimately, the high-winged CX-HLS Boeing design was not used for the 747, although technologies developed for their bid had an influence.[21] The original design included a full-length double-deck fuselage with eight-across seating and two aisles on the lower deck and seven-across seating and two aisles on the upper deck.[22][23] However, concern over evacuation routes and limited cargo-carrying capability caused this idea to be scrapped in early 1966 in favor of a wider single deck design.[17] The cockpit was therefore placed on a shortened upper deck so that a freight-loading door could be included in the nose cone; this feature produced the 747's distinctive "hump".[24] In early models, what to do with the small space in the pod behind the cockpit was not clear, and it was initially specified as a "lounge" area with no permanent seating.[25] (A different configuration that had been considered to keep the flight deck out of the way for freight loading had the pilots below the passengers, and was dubbed the "anteater".)[26]

The Pratt & Whitney JT9D turbofan suspended under the wing pylon of the 747 prototype. It is stripped of its outer casing, revealing the engine's core at The Museum of Flight in Seattle, WA
The Pratt & Whitney JT9D high-bypass turbofan engine was developed for the 747.

One of the principal technologies that enabled an aircraft as large as the 747 was the high-bypass turbofan engine.[27] This engine technology was thought to be capable of delivering twice the power of the earlier turbojets while consuming one-third less fuel. General Electric had pioneered the concept but was committed to developing the engine for the C-5 Galaxy and did not enter the commercial market until later.[28][29] Pratt & Whitney was also working on the same principle and, by late 1966, Boeing, Pan Am and Pratt & Whitney agreed to develop a new engine, designated the JT9D to power the 747.[29]

The project was designed with a new methodology called fault tree analysis, which allowed the effects of a failure of a single part to be studied to determine its impact on other systems.[17] To address concerns about safety and flyability, the 747's design included structural redundancy, redundant hydraulic systems, quadruple main landing gear and dual control surfaces.[30] Additionally, some of the most advanced high-lift devices used in the industry were included in the new design, to allow it to operate from existing airports. These included Krueger flaps running almost the entire length of the wing's leading edge, as well as complex three-part slotted flaps along the trailing edge of the wing.[31][32] The wing's complex three-part flaps increased wing area by 21% and lift by 90% when fully deployed compared to their non-deployed configuration.[33]

Boeing agreed to deliver the first 747 to Pan Am by the end of 1969. That date left 28 months to design the aircraft, just two-thirds of the normal time.[34] The schedule was so fast-paced that the people who worked on it were given the nickname "The Incredibles".[35] Developing the aircraft was such a technical and financial challenge that management was said to have "bet the company" when it started the project.[17] Due to its large size, Boeing subcontracted the assembly of subcomponents to other manufacturers, notably Northrop and Grumman (later merged into Northrop Grumman in 1994) for fuselage parts and trailing edge flaps respectively,[36] Fairchild for tailplane ailerons,[37] and Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV) for the empennage.[36][38] For the 747SP, assembly was subcontracted to Japanese companies comprising Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, and Fuji, which were responsible for assembly of the inboard flaps, outboard flaps, and vertical rudder respectively.[39]

Assembly plant

Airplane assembly hall, featuring heavy machinery. Large cylindrical airplane sections and wings are readied for mating with other major components. Above are the cranes which ferry heavy and outsize parts of the 747.
747 final assembly at the Boeing Everett Factory

Boeing did not have a plant large enough to assemble the giant airliner, so they chose to build a new plant. The company considered locations in about 50 cities,[40] and eventually decided to build the new plant some 30 miles (50 km) north of Seattle on a site adjoining a military base at Paine Field near Everett, Washington.[41] It bought the 780-acre (320 ha) site in June 1966.[42]

Developing the 747 had been a major challenge, and building its assembly plant was also a huge undertaking. Boeing president William M. Allen asked Malcolm T. Stamper, then head of the company's turbine division, to oversee construction of the Everett factory and to start production of the 747.[43] To level the site, more than four million cubic yards (three million cubic meters) of earth had to be moved.[44] Time was so short that the 747's full-scale mock-up was built before the factory roof above it was finished.[45] The plant is the largest building by volume ever built, and has been expanded several times to permit construction of other models of Boeing wide-body commercial jets.[41]

Flight testing

File:Boeing 747 rollout (3).jpg
The prototype 747 was first displayed to the public on September 30, 1968.

Before the first 747 was fully assembled, testing began on many components and systems. One important test involved the evacuation of 560 volunteers from a cabin mock-up via the aircraft's emergency chutes. The first full-scale evacuation took two and a half minutes instead of the maximum of 90 seconds mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and several volunteers were injured. Subsequent test evacuations achieved the 90-second goal but caused more injuries. Most problematic was evacuation from the aircraft's upper deck; instead of using a conventional slide, volunteer passengers escaped by using a harness attached to a reel.[46] Tests also involved taxiing such a large aircraft. Boeing built an unusual training device known as "Waddell's Wagon" (named for a 747 test pilot, Jack Waddell) that consisted of a mock-up cockpit mounted on the roof of a truck. While the first 747s were still being built, the device allowed pilots to practice taxi maneuvers from a high upper-deck position.[47]

In 1968, the program cost was US$1 billion[48] (equivalent to $Template:Inflation billion in Template:Inflation-year dollars). On September 30, 1968, the first 747 was rolled out of the Everett assembly building for the world's press and representatives of the 26 airlines that had ordered the airliner.[49] Over the following months, preparations were made for the first flight, which took place on February 9, 1969, with test pilots Jack Waddell and Brien Wygle at the controls[50][51] and Jess Wallick at the flight engineer's station. Despite a minor problem with one of the flaps, the flight confirmed that the 747 handled extremely well. The 747 was found to be largely immune to "Dutch roll", a phenomenon that had been a major hazard to the early swept-wing jets.[52]

After the 747's introduction into commercial service in 1970, Boeing continued flight tests to address issues with the 747's design. In its first year of service, it was observed generating a significant amount of wake turbulence and posed a risk for smaller aircraft flying behind it, prompting the FAA to implement separation rules for aircraft flying close to 747s; the French government banned Pan Am from flying 747s into Paris during its first year of 747 service due to this concern.[53] Boeing addressed these concerns in 1970 by conducting wake turbulence tests with a 737-100 flying closely behind a 747 at various distances to measure the wake generation of the larger aircraft, which Boeing found only to have a slight difference from the wake generated by the smaller 707 flown in the same test.[53][54]

Delays and certification

A view of the 747's four main landing gear, each with four wheels
The 747's 16-wheel main landing gear

During later stages of the flight test program, flutter testing showed that the wings suffered oscillation under certain conditions. This difficulty was partly solved by reducing the stiffness of some wing components. However, a particularly severe high-speed flutter problem was solved only by inserting depleted uranium counterweights as ballast in the outboard engine nacelles of the early 747s.[55] This measure caused some concern when these aircraft crashed, for example El Al Flight 1862 at Amsterdam in 1992 with 622 pounds (282 kg) of uranium in the tailplane (horizontal stabilizer); detailed investigations showed, however, that the best estimate of the exposure to depleted uranium was ".. several orders of magnitude less than the workers' limit for chronic exposure."[56][57]

The flight test program was hampered by problems with the 747's JT9D engines. Difficulties included engine stalls caused by rapid throttle movements and distortion of the turbine casings after a short period of service.[58] The problems delayed 747 deliveries for several months; up to 20 aircraft at the Everett plant were stranded while awaiting engine installation.[59] The program was further delayed when one of the five test aircraft suffered serious damage during a landing attempt at Renton Municipal Airport, the site of Boeing's Renton factory. The incident happened on December 13, 1969, when a test aircraft was flown to Renton to have test equipment removed and a cabin installed. Pilot Ralph C. Cokely undershot the airport's short runway and the 747's right, outer landing gear was torn off and two engine nacelles were damaged.[60][61] However, these difficulties did not prevent Boeing from taking a test aircraft to the 28th Paris Air Show in mid-1969, where it was displayed to the public for the first time.[62] Finally, in December 1969, the 747 received its FAA airworthiness certificate, clearing it for introduction into service.[63] Pan Am introduced the first 747 service the following year on January 22, 1970.[64]

The huge cost of developing the 747 and building the Everett factory meant that Boeing had to borrow heavily from a banking syndicate. During the final months before delivery of the first aircraft, the company had to repeatedly request additional funding to complete the project. Had this been refused, Boeing's survival would have been threatened.[18][65] The firm's debt exceeded $2 billion, with $1.2 billion owed to the banks setting a record for all companies. Allen later said, "It was really too large a project for us."[66] Ultimately, the gamble succeeded, and Boeing held a monopoly in very large passenger aircraft production for many years.[67]

Improved versions

Template:Multiple images

After the initial 747-100, Boeing developed the -100B, a higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) variant, and the -100SR (Short Range), with higher passenger capacity.[68] Increased maximum takeoff weight allows aircraft to carry more fuel and have longer range.[69] The -200 model followed in 1971, featuring more powerful engines and a higher MTOW. Passenger, freighter and combination passenger-freighter versions of the -200 were produced.[68] The shortened 747SP (special performance) with a longer range was also developed, and entered service in 1976.[70]

Boeing primarily focused on improving payload capabilities during the development and testing of the 747-200 and its subvariants in the 1970s. Weight trials were conducted between October and November of 1970 at Edwards Air Force Base with the prototype 747-200B, which reached a maximum takeoff weight of 820,700 pounds (372.3 t) during a test flight on November 12. At that time, the aircraft held the record for the heaviest takeoff weight until heavier and more powerful 747-200 airframes were built.[71] On November 1, 1976, the first RB211-powered 747-200 set a world record for maximum mass lifted during a trial flight at NAS Lemoore, where it flew up to 6,562 feet (2,000 meters) with a weight of 840,500 pounds (381.2 t).[72]

The 747 line was further developed with the launch of the 747-300 on June 11, 1980, followed by interest from Swissair a month later and the go-ahead for the project.[73]: 86  The 300 series resulted from Boeing studies to increase the seating capacity of the 747, during which modifications such as fuselage plugs and extending the upper deck over the entire length of the fuselage were rejected. The first 747-300, completed in 1983, included a stretched upper deck, increased cruise speed, and increased seating capacity. The -300 variant was previously designated 747SUD for stretched upper deck, then 747-200 SUD,[74] followed by 747EUD, before the 747-300 designation was used.[75] Passenger, short range and combination freighter-passenger versions of the 300 series were produced.[68]

Throughout the early 1980s, Boeing faced criticism from customers who expressed frustration over Boeing's incremental approach to the 747's development, pointing out that previous 747 variants were developed merely as derivatives of the original 747-100 from the late 1960s, with improvements focused on one area of the design (i.e. payload for the 747-200, range for the 747SP and later 747-200 models, passenger capacity for the 747-300), rather than as complete revamps of the original design that incorporated newer technologies of the decade to update systems and performance; in an effort to save on Boeing's total development costs across all aircraft types, the finance department disallowed the design team from proposing major changes to the 747.[76] The demand for a modernized 747 with newer technologies intensified after the publication of an interview with Lufthansa's then-deputy chairman, Reinhardt Abraham [de], on the May 28, 1984, issue of Aviation Week & Space Technology, which stated:

Boeing is working on all of the proposed improvements but Lufthansa is concerned that they will make them available in a piecemeal fashion. Abraham said this would increase the development cost, which will be passed along to the airlines, and result in airlines operating a fleet of 747 aircraft that have little remaining commonality. "We don't like the piecemeal approach," Abraham said. "We want one full package on the airplane. It would be a big incentive for new orders."[77]

After the publication of Abraham's Aviation Week & Space Technology interview, more airlines became vocal about expressing their demands for a modernized 747, to which Boeing responded by launching the development of the longer-range 747-400 in October 1985.[77][78] This variant had a new glass cockpit, which allowed for a cockpit crew of two instead of three,[79] new engines, lighter construction materials, and a redesigned interior.[80] Development costs soared, and production delays occurred as new technologies were incorporated at the request of airlines. Insufficient workforce experience and reliance on overtime contributed to early production problems on the 747-400.[17] The -400 entered service in 1989.[80]

The 747 remained the heaviest commercial aircraft in regular service until the debut of the Antonov An-124 Ruslan in 1982; variants of the 747-400 surpassed the An-124's weight in 2000. The Antonov An-225 Mriya cargo transport, which debuted in 1988, remains the world's largest aircraft by several measures (including the most accepted measures of maximum takeoff weight and length); one aircraft has been completed and was in service until 2022 when it was destroyed. The Scaled Composites Stratolaunch is currently the largest aircraft by wingspan.[81]

Further development

Interior view. Seats are separated by two aisles, in 3–4–3 configuration. A TV is positioned towards the front of aircraft.
747-400 main deck economy class seating in 3–4–3 layout

After the arrival of the 747-400, several stretching schemes for the 747 were proposed. Boeing announced the larger 747-500X and -600X preliminary designs in 1996.[82] The new variants would have cost more than US$5 billion,[82] and interest was not sufficient to continue.[83] In 2000, Boeing offered the more modest 747X and 747X stretch derivatives as alternatives to the Airbus A38X. However, the 747X family was unable to attract enough interest to enter production. A year later, Boeing switched from the 747X studies to pursue the Sonic Cruiser,[84] and after the Sonic Cruiser program was put on hold, the 787 Dreamliner.[85] Some of the ideas developed for the 747X were used on the 747-400ER, a longer range variant of the 747-400.[86]

After several variants were proposed but abandoned, some industry observers became skeptical of new aircraft proposals from Boeing.[87] However, in early 2004, Boeing announced plans for the 747 Advanced that were eventually adopted. Similar in nature to the 747-X, the stretched 747 Advanced used technology from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems. The 747 remained the largest passenger airliner in service until the Airbus A380 began airline service in 2007.[88]

A Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental for Lufthansa
A Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental of Lufthansa

On November 14, 2005, Boeing announced it was launching the 747 Advanced as the Boeing 747-8.[89] The last 747-400s were completed in 2009.[90] As of 2011, most orders of the 747-8 were for the freighter variant. On February 8, 2010, the 747-8 Freighter made its maiden flight.[91] The first delivery of the 747-8 went to Cargolux in 2011.[92][93] The first 747-8 Intercontinental passenger variant was delivered to Lufthansa on May 5, 2012.[94] The 1,500th Boeing 747 was delivered in June 2014 to Lufthansa.[95]

In January 2016, Boeing stated it was reducing 747-8 production to six per year beginning in September 2016, incurring a $569 million post-tax charge against its fourth-quarter 2015 profits. At the end of 2015, the company had 20 orders outstanding.[96][97] On January 29, 2016, Boeing announced that it had begun the preliminary work on the modifications to a commercial 747-8 for the next Air Force One presidential aircraft, then expected to be operational by 2020.[98]

On July 12, 2016, Boeing announced that it had finalized an order from Volga-Dnepr Group for 20 747-8 freighters, valued at $7.58 billion (~$Template:Format price in Template:Inflation/year) at list prices. Four aircraft were delivered beginning in 2012. Volga-Dnepr Group is the parent of three major Russian air-freight carriers – Volga-Dnepr Airlines, AirBridgeCargo Airlines and Atran Airlines. The new 747-8 freighters would replace AirBridgeCargo's current 747-400 aircraft and expand the airline's fleet and will be acquired through a mix of direct purchases and leasing over the next six years, Boeing said.[99]

End of production

On July 27, 2016, in its quarterly report to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Boeing discussed the termination of 747 production due to insufficient demand.[100] With a firm order backlog of 21 aircraft and a production rate of six per year, program accounting had been reduced to 1,555 aircraft.[101] In October 2016, UPS Airlines ordered 14 -8Fs to add capacity, with options for 14, added in February 2018 to increase the total to 28 -8Fs on order.[102][103] The backlog then stood at 25 aircraft, though several of these were orders from airlines that no longer intended to take delivery.[104]

On July 2, 2020, it was reported that Boeing planned to end 747 production in 2022 upon delivery of the remaining jets for UPS and the Volga-Dnepr Group, due to low demand.[105] On July 29, 2020, Boeing confirmed that the final 747 would be delivered in 2022 as a result of "current market dynamics and outlook" stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, according to CEO David Calhoun.[106] The last aircraft, a 747-8F for Atlas Air registered N863GT, rolled off the production line on December 6, 2022,[107] and was delivered on January 31, 2023.[108] Boeing hosted an event at the Everett factory for thousands of workers as well as industry executives to commemorate the delivery.[109]

Design

File:Boeing 747-100 3-view.png
Three-view diagram of the original 747-100, showing its general configuration maintained in later variants
File:Air New Zealand Boeing 747-400 (ZK-SUH) arrives London Heathrow 17Oct2010 arp.jpg
Front view showing the triple-slotted trailing edge flaps

The 747 is a large, wide-body (two-aisle) airliner with four wing-mounted engines. Its wings have a high sweep angle of 37.5° for a fast, efficient cruise speed[24] of Mach 0.84 to 0.88, depending on the variant. The sweep also reduces the wingspan, allowing the 747 to use existing hangars.[17][110] Its seating capacity is over 366 with a 3–4–3 seat arrangement (two aisles with three seats on each side and four seats in the middle) in economy class and a 2–3–2 layout in first class on the main deck. The upper deck has a 3–3 seat arrangement in economy class and a 2–2 layout in first class.[111] Lavatories for later passenger models built from the 1980s onwards could be placed anywhere in the cabin through the installation of a central waste disposal system, dubbed the "sewer system", powered by an electric pump to provide suction. The "sewer system" was proposed by KLM chief engineer Gerald Lamb and initially tested on the Boeing 767 before its installation on 747s.[112]

Seated 2 ft 7 in (0.79 m) above the floor of the main deck,[113] the cockpit creates a hump. This raised cockpit allows front loading of cargo on freight variants.[24] The upper deck behind the cockpit provides space for a lounge and/or extra seating. Some operators also configured the upper deck with features other than passenger seating or lounges, such as the Skybeds of Philippine Airlines' 747-200Bs, which provided passengers with genuine beds fitted with seatbelts, enabling them to sleep during long-haul sectors.[114] The "stretched upper deck" became available as an alternative on the 747-100B variant and later as a standard configuration beginning with the 747-300. The upper deck was stretched further on the 747-8. The 747 cockpit roof section also has an escape hatch, from which the cockpit crew can exit during an emergency if they cannot do so through the cabin. An inertial reel attached to a cable is provided for each crew member to hold onto while exiting through the hatch and sliding down to the ground.[115][116]

The 747's maximum takeoff weight ranges from 735,000 pounds (333 t) for the -100 to 970,000 pounds (440 t) for the -8. Its range has increased from 5,300 nautical miles (9,800 km; 6,100 mi) on the -100 to 8,000 nautical miles (15,000 km; 9,200 mi) on the -8I.[117][118]

The 747 has redundant structures along with four redundant hydraulic systems and four main landing gears each with four wheels; these provide good support on the ground and safety in case of tire blow-outs. The main gear are redundant so that landing can be performed on two opposing landing gears if the others are not functioning properly.[119] The 747 also has split control surfaces and was designed with sophisticated triple-slotted flaps that minimize landing speeds and allow the 747 to use standard-length runways.[120]

The undercarriage comprises a twin-wheeled nose gear and four sets of four-wheeled main gear bogies, two on the wing roots and two beneath the main fuselage. The bogies on the main fuselage are positioned behind the wing to accommodate heavy payloads and balance the load away from the nose gear, especially during takeoff and landing. The ground steering system of the landing gear is designed to enable the fuselage side bogies to move in concert with the nose gear. All the tires on the landing gear are tubeless and identical in size to facilitate interchangeability. Wheels on the main gear units of Classic variants were fitted with anti-skid disc brakes.[121] The 747-400 later introduced carbon brakes and provided instrumentation that enabled the cockpit panel to display tire pressure values.[122]

To transport spare engines, the 747 can accommodate a non-functioning fifth-pod engine under the aircraft's port wing between the inner functioning engine and the fuselage.[123][124] Use of the fifth engine pod increases drag on the left side of the aircraft, which pilots need to compensate for by maintaining a consistent heading. When Air India Flight 182, operated by a 747-237B named Emperor Kanishka,[125] broke apart over the Atlantic Ocean while ferrying a fifth engine on a scheduled flight from Montréal to London's Heathrow Airport on June 23, 1985, investigators considered the fifth engine pod a potential threat to the structural integrity of the 747's airframe. It was eventually ruled out as a cause of the crash after evaluation of the aircraft's flight data recorder (FDR) found no anomalies in the aircraft's handling, and the incident was revealed to have been caused by a terrorist bombing.[126] The fifth engine mount point was used by Virgin Orbit's LauncherOne program to carry an orbital-class rocket to cruise altitude where it was deployed.[127][128]

Internally, the 747 Classic variants, comprising the -100/200/300/SP, were designed to be flown by two pilots and a flight engineer relying on then-innovative electro-mechanical analog instruments for flight operations,[129] which are either dual or triple redundant.[130] Specifications of individual aircraft were delivered in accordance with the requests of their respective customers,[130] who were given the option to customize cockpit layouts through means such as choosing to install either dial or tape-style gauges.[131] The introduction of digital cockpit displays on the 747-400 later gave pilots the option to choose between displaying either dial or tape-style indicators by programming the display driver without the need to reinstrument the cockpit as was done for the Classic variants' analog cockpits.[132] Unlike the earlier 707, the 747 did not need a navigator in the cockpit, as it was the first commercial aircraft to utilize an inertial navigation system (INS). Among the other advanced technologies included in the 747 were an autothrottle for automatic airspeed control and a performance management system (PMS).[133]

The 747-400, launched in October 1985, replaced analog instruments with electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) similar to those of the Boeing 757 and 767.[134][135] These technologies reduced the number of cockpit instruments to 300 indicators and 200 switches from the nearly 690 dials and lights and 280 switches found in Classic variants,[136] and they also enabled the -400 to be manned by two pilots, eliminating the flight engineer's position of previous variants.[134]

On average, a 747 Classic airframe has approximately 135 mi (215 km) of electrical wiring and 1 mi (1.6 km) of hydraulics to power its systems. The wiring was reduced by about 30% for the 747-400.[130]

Operational history

Commercial service

Passenger operators

File:Pat Nixon christens Boeing 747 2749-18.jpg
First Lady Pat Nixon christened the first commercial 747 on January 15, 1970.

On January 15, 1970, First Lady Pat Nixon christened Pan Am's first 747 at Dulles International Airport in the presence of Pan Am chairman Najeeb Halaby.[137] Instead of champagne, red, white, and blue water was sprayed on the aircraft.

The 747 entered service on January 22, 1970, on Pan Am's New York–London route.[64] The flight had been planned for the evening of January 21, but engine overheating made the original aircraft (Clipper Young America, registration N735PA) unusable. Finding a substitute delayed the flight by more than six hours to the following day when Clipper Victor (registration N736PA) was used.[138][139] The 747 enjoyed a fairly smooth introduction into service, overcoming concerns that some airports would not be able to accommodate an aircraft that large.[140] Although technical problems occurred, they were relatively minor and quickly solved.[141] Pan Am soon expanded its network of transatlantic 747 operations to various destinations in Europe, namely Amsterdam, Barcelona, Brussels, Frankfurt, Lisbon, Paris, and Rome, from hubs in New York and London's Heathrow Airport before commencing transpacific operations from Los Angeles and San Francisco to Honolulu, Hong Kong, and Tokyo once enough aircraft were delivered.[142][143] The Los Angeles and San Francisco hubs were connected to London and Paris via polar routes, and Pan Am 747s also flew from Chicago to Frankfurt and London and from New York to San Juan.[143]

After the aircraft's introduction with launch customer Pan Am in 1970, other airlines that had bought the 747 to stay competitive began to put their own 747s into service.[144] Within months after the inaugural 747 service, Pan Am faced competition on international routes from other US-based carriers, specifically Trans World Airlines (TWA) on transatlantic routes and Northwest Airlines on transpacific routes.[145] TWA initially commenced 747 operations on its domestic network with a New York–Los Angeles service before placing the type into service on its New York–London route in March 1970, while Northwest commenced 747 services between New York, Chicago, Seattle, and Tokyo that same year in July.[142][146] Pan Am also competed with foreign carriers such as Air France, Japan Airlines, and Lufthansa within the first year of 747 service.[147]

Within the United States, the 747 was introduced on domestic routes. American Airlines introduced the 747-100 on the New York–Los Angeles route in March 1970, using aircraft leased from Pan Am, as American's own 747 fleet was not delivered from Boeing until later in the year. Braniff International Airways, Continental Airlines, Delta Airlines, Eastern Airlines, National Airlines, and United Airlines soon inaugurated their own domestic services with 747s between 1970 and 1971.[148]

Boeing estimated that half of the early 747 sales were to airlines desiring the aircraft's long range rather than its payload capacity.[149][150] While the 747 had the lowest potential operating cost per seat, this could only be achieved when the aircraft was fully loaded; costs per seat increased rapidly as occupancy declined. A moderately loaded 747, one with only 70 percent of its seats occupied, used more than 95 percent of the fuel needed by a fully occupied 747.[151] Nonetheless, many flag-carriers purchased the 747 due to its prestige, "even if it made no sense economically" to operate. During the 1970s and 1980s, over 30 regularly scheduled 747s could often be seen at John F. Kennedy International Airport.[152]

The recession of 1969–1970, despite having been characterized as relatively mild, greatly affected Boeing. For the year and a half after September 1970, it only sold two 747s in the world, both to Irish flag carrier Aer Lingus.[153][154] No 747s were sold to any American carrier for almost three years.[66] When economic problems in the US and other countries after the 1973 oil crisis led to reduced passenger traffic, several airlines found they did not have enough passengers to fly the 747 economically, and they replaced them with the smaller and recently introduced McDonnell Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 TriStar trijet wide bodies[155] (and later the 767 and Airbus A300/A310 twinjets). Having tried replacing coach seats on its 747s with piano bars in an attempt to attract more customers, American Airlines eventually relegated its 747s to cargo service and, in 1983, exchanged them with Pan Am for smaller aircraft;[156] Continental Airlines and Delta Airlines also removed their 747-100s from service not long after their introduction and replaced them with DC-10s and L-1011s, respectively,[157][158] but both airlines would later reacquire 747s and continue operating them through mergers with other carriers. Continental operated the 747-100 again after merging with PEOPLExpress in 1987,[159] while Delta acquired the 747-400 fleet of Northwest Airlines as part of their merger in 2008, although Delta retired the -400s in December 2017.[160]

File:Boeing 747 JAL.jpg
A Boeing 747 Classic of Japan Airlines, the type's all-time largest operator, over Mount Fuji, c. 1970s.

The 747 saw the most success as the primary long-haul aircraft for airlines operating in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region,[161] where it had been introduced by airlines based in those regions within its first year of service in 1970. Lufthansa became the first European operator of the 747 and the first carrier outside the United States to inaugurate 747 services when its first 747-100 was delivered on March 10, 1970, and entered service on the Frankfurt–New York route the following month, replacing the smaller 707s that were previously flown.[162] Japan Airlines commenced 747 operations in June 1970 with routes between Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Los Angeles, making it the first Asian operator of the 747.[146] Air India followed Japan Airlines as the second Asian operator of the 747 with the acquisition of 747-200s in 1971 as replacements for older 707s on the airline's routes to London and New York.[163] By 1971, more European carriers like Aer Lingus, British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC), and Sabena, had acquired their own fleets of 747-100s,[162] and European airlines that had previously not purchased any Boeing aircraft, such as Alitalia, KLM, and Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), chose the 747 as their first Boeing aircraft to remain competitive on long-haul routes.[164][165][166] KLM, the launch customer of the improved 747-200B variant introduced in February 1971,[143] had formed the KSSU consortium in 1968 with SAS, Swissair, and Union de Transports Aériens (UTA) to provide a maintenance and training pool for 747 operators while providing technical advice for the 747's development.[167]

The 747 mainly appealed to Asian and European operators due to having more range than its contemporaries, the DC-10 and L-1011.[161][168] Partly in response to accidents involving the DC-10 and the grounding of DC-10 fleets around the world in 1979,[169] some airlines, such as Air New Zealand, Alitalia, and Singapore Airlines, completely replaced their DC-10s with 747s for fleet standardisation and deployed the latter on routes previously assigned to the former;[170][171][172] Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) traded its remaining DC-10s with Canadian Pacific Air Lines (also known as CP Air) for the latter airline's 747-200s in 1986.[173] Other airlines maintained fleets of smaller widebody types as complements to the 747 and assigned them to routes that either had airports too small to accommodate the 747 or did not have enough passenger traffic to fill a 747, as was the case for operators like Japan Airlines, KLM, Northwest Airlines, and Philippine Airlines that expanded their 747 fleets while simultaneously operating DC-10s during the 1980s.[168][174][175][176][177] L-1011s were also operated alongside 747s in the fleets of airlines like Air Canada, All Nippon Airways (ANA), British Airways, Cathay Pacific, Saudia, and TWA,[178][179] while airlines such as Air France, Alitalia, Garuda Indonesia, Korean Air, Lufthansa, Malaysia Airlines, South African Airways, and Thai Airways operated A300s together with their 747s.[180][181] In much rarer cases observed during the 1980s, there were airlines whose widebody fleets were purely composed of 747s until the introduction of other types, examples including Aerolineas Argentinas, Air India, Avianca, and Qantas.[182]

File:1981-09-15 12-00-00 United States Hawaii Aliamanu.JPG
747s at Honolulu International Airport in 1981. The 747 was a common sight at airports along the Pacific Ocean.

Many international carriers used the 747 on Pacific routes,[183] while ANA and Japan Airlines deployed short-range 747 models on Japanese domestic routes. 747s specially designed for short-haul operations were offered to ANA and Japan Airlines as a response to the rapid growth of Japanese domestic traffic in the late 1960s, which had reached an average domestic load factor of 85% by 1970 and could not be efficiently addressed by smaller Boeing 727s and Douglas DC-8s that were then in operation with the two airlines.[184] The original series of aircraft, known as the 747SR and based on the 747-100, was configured to carry over 550 people, close to the maximum passenger capacity.[185][186][187]

The 747's prominence at airports in the Asia-Pacific region was noticed by its chief designer, Joe Sutter, who frequently traveled to Asia on business trips during his lifetime and wrote about his habit of watching 747s at airports beginning in the mid-1980s. On one such trip to Japan, he recalled counting 55 747s at Narita International Airport in Tokyo while waiting for his flight home, remarking in his autobiography that the 747s "clustered as thickly as single-aisle 737s do at U.S. airports." Sutter estimated that, assuming each 747 was at most 75% occupied, they carried as many as 20,000 people within the two hours he spent watching 747s arrive at Narita Airport.[188]

International flights bypassing traditional hub airports and landing at smaller cities became more common throughout the 1980s, thus eroding the 747's original market.[189] Airlines leased additional 747s to accommodate increased passenger flow between destinations during special occasions. For instance, airlines in Muslim-majority countries like Garuda Indonesia leased additional 747s for flights to Jeddah during the annual Hajj pilgrimage.[190]

Freighter operators

Just as the design team had envisioned, the 747 also saw use as a freighter. Its design enabled not only the assembly of dedicated freighter aircraft but also the conversion of surplus airframes that were no longer wanted by passenger airlines,[191] as the design team expected during its development that 747s would see more frequent usage as freighters as demand for passenger-carrying 747s would wane.[192]

However, while the design team assumed that this decrease in demand for passenger 747s would come as a result of increased interest in the supersonic airliners in development at the time, such as Concorde and the cancelled Boeing 2707, this ultimately did not happen;[192] instead, this decrease was caused by the introduction of ETOPS-capable widebody twinjets from the 1980s to the 2000s, such as the Airbus A310 and A330 and Boeing's own 767, 777, and 787, which were more efficient to operate than the trijets and quadjets which preceded them. Indeed, tri- and quadjet designs from the same era - including the Airbus A380, which was designed to compete directly with the 747 - struggled to reach commercial success.[193][194]

Dedicated freighter variants were typically assembled with an upward-opening hinged nose and a side cargo door for freight loading, while conversions on former passenger airframes only added the side cargo door and reinforced the main deck floor while removing seats, galleys, toilets, overhead baggage stowage, and other passenger accommodations.[191]

The first dedicated freighter variant was the 747-200F introduced by Lufthansa Cargo (then an in-house division of Lufthansa), which took delivery of the first -200F on March 9, 1972. Lufthansa Cargo was the sole operator of the type until Air France, Japan Airlines, and Seaboard World Airlines followed with their own orders for 747-200Fs in 1974.[195] Around this time, the first conversion from a passenger airframe was conducted in 1974 at Boeing's Wichita plant on an ex-American Airlines 747-100 acquired by Flying Tiger Line. Within the decade, Boeing Wichita performed freighter conversions on ex-passenger 747-100s operated by American Airlines, Pan Am, and the Imperial Iranian Air Force (IIAF).[196]

By the 1990s, many older 747s that had been phased out from the fleets of passenger airlines found themselves in the hands of cargo operators who needed them to transport heavy freight loads across long distances. They became a favored choice of aircraft for small cargo carriers at the time, particularly those in the United States, such as Atlas Air, Kalitta Air, and Southern Air Transport.[197]

Government and military service

United States

United States Air Force
File:Fuel on the go (7277495).jpg
E-4B airborne command post as seen from a KC-135 tanker

The United States Air Force (USAF) operates specially designed variants of the Boeing 747 for its purposes, namely the E-4B airborne command posts of the National Emergency Airborne Command Post (NEACP) program and the VC-25 presidential transports.[198][199] Both aircraft were developed as replacements for KC-135/707 derivatives that previously performed their respective roles, with the E-4 replacing the EC-135 in 1973 and the VC-25 replacing the VC-137C in 1990.[199][200]

The first three E-4 airframes were initially designated E-4A and delivered between June 1973 and October 1974[201] with almost the same equipment as the EC-135, albeit with minor updates.[202] In May 1975, the fourth aircraft was delivered as the updated E-4B,[203] which introduced a super-high-frequency (SHF) satellite antenna mounted on the upper deck roof among other upgrades. Its design, however, was not finalized until January 1980. The first three aircraft were subsequently updated to E-4B specifications between 1983 and 1985.[204]

File:Members of the 372nd Transportation, 101st Airborne Division, disembark a 747 Flying Tiger aircraft during exercise Ocean Venture '82 - DPLA - 19128c7c75bd888955472aedd85559fa.jpeg
U.S. Army infantrymen of the 101st Airborne Division disembarking from a Flying Tiger Line Boeing 747-200F deployed at Roosevelt Roads Naval Station for Exercise Ocean Venture, 1982.

Aside from the variants developed specifically for the USAF, some civilian 747s were chartered for USAF missions. One of the earliest deployments of civilian 747s into military service was Operation Babylift, the mass evacuation of South Vietnamese children to the United States during the closing stages of the Vietnam War. On April 5, 1975, two 747s of Pan Am were privately chartered to assist USAF Military Airlift Command (MAC) transport aircraft in carrying 728 children from Tan Son Nhat International Airport in Saigon to the US West Coast, with one aircraft going to San Francisco and the other to Seattle.[205]Template:Reference page[206] Seven days later on April 12, a World Airways 747-200C (all of World Airways' 747s at that time were 747-200C models)[207] was chartered to transport 329 children who had been left behind in Clark Air Base in Angeles City, Philippines, to Los Angeles.[205]Template:Reference page

Pan Am 747s would again see military service one more time after Operation Babylift and before the airline ceased operations in 1991, this time as volunteer aircraft for the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) during the 1980s and 1990s.[208] Between 1985 and 1990, 19 of Pan Am's 747s, comprising 15 747-100s and 4 747-200Bs, were converted at Boeing Wichita for CRAF use as either troop transports or freighters in the event of a national emergency.[209][210][211] Much like the 747-200C variant, the modified 747s, which were given the USAF designation C-19A, could be converted between passenger and freighter configurations, which was made possible by the installation of strengthened floor beams and a side cargo door aft of the left wing.[209] The fuselage reinforcements and additional cargo door on the main deck added 13,000 pounds (5.9 t) to the empty weight of each aircraft, prompting the USAF to pay compensation for the increased weight whenever these aircraft were used on Pan Am's commercial flights.[210] Three Pan Am aircraft were notably deployed along with 747s of Northwest Airlines as troop transports for Operation Desert Storm in 1990.[208] Although none of the Pan Am 747s were destroyed during combat missions, one of the converted aircraft, a 747-121 named Clipper Maid of the Seas, was lost to a terrorist bomb attack while flying over Lockerbie, Scotland, as Pan Am Flight 103, a scheduled commercial flight, on December 21, 1988.[125][209]

Although Boeing had attempted to convince to USAF to buy its own dedicated fleet of 747 freighters in two separate instances between the 1980s and 1990s, it rejected these in favor of additional Lockheed C-5s and, later, Boeing C-17s.[212] The USAF did, however, charter 747s from airlines like Evergreen International Airlines, Flying Tiger Line, and Tower Air to conduct transport missions to overseas bases outside the United States.[213]

NASA
File:OV-101 first flight.jpg
Shuttle Carrier Aircraft N905NA releasing the Space Shuttle Enterprise for a free flight test in 1977. N905NA is seen here partially painted in its former American Airlines livery with NASA titles.
File:The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA).jpg
The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA)

The 747 participated in the American space program through NASA's usage of two secondhand 747s, comprising one 747-100 from American Airlines and one 747SR from Japan Airlines,[214] as the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA)[215] and one ex-Pan Am 747SP as the Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA).[216][217]

The Shuttle Carrier Aircraft was proposed as a solution to the logistical challenges of transporting Space Shuttle orbiters after each mission across the continental United States from their landing site in Edwards Air Force Base in California to the launch site in Kennedy Space Center in Florida.[198][215] The proposal materialized when the first airframe, an ex-American Airlines 747-123 registered as N905NA and previously used for vortex flow research, was converted by Boeing with components developed at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center to enable the mounting and dismounting of the shuttle orbiters from the top of the aircraft's fuselage. From February 18 to August 13, 1977, the aircraft was deployed on a three-phase series of flights to test its handling with the Space Shuttle Enterprise mounted on top, with the third flight being the first of five involving the release of a manned shuttle from the 747 in mid-air to enable the former to enter free flight and have its flight characteristics evaluated while the Shuttle crew glided back to Edwards Air Force Base.[218] Once the test flights concluded, N905NA was used to perform its originally proposed purpose of ferrying Space Shuttles between their landing and launch sites. In 1988, it was accompanied by a second aircraft, a 747SR-46 acquired from Japan Airlines and re-registered as N911NA in NASA service;[215][218] N911NA was also the first production 747SR and had been delivered to Japan Airlines in 1973 to operate on its domestic routes.[201][219]

In 1997, NASA acquired an ex-Pan Am 747SP-21, named Clipper Lindbergh in honor of Charles Lindbergh, for use as the Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA). The aircraft was modified by Raytheon with an 18 ft × 13.5 ft (5.5 m × 4.1 m) door on the left side of the fuselage to accommodate a large reflector telescope, which was assembled in Germany and shipped to the United States for mounting on the airframe in 2004. The aircraft was operational with the telescope by 2010 and conducted a series of observatory flights until its retirement in 2022 due to rising operational costs.[217] The aircraft currently survives in preservation at the Pima Air and Space Museum in Tucson, Arizona.[220]

Iran

File:IIAF Boeing 707 refuels IIAF Boeing 747.jpg
Imperial Iranian Air Force (IIAF) Boeing 747-100F refueling from a KC-707 tanker.

The only air force with its own dedicated fleet of 747 freighters was the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF), formerly known as the Imperial Iranian Air Force (IIAF). In 1975, the IIAF acquired twelve passenger 747s, comprising nine ex-TWA 747-131s and three ex-Continental Airlines 747-124s, for conversion into freighters.[221] All but one of the ex-TWA aircraft were converted,[222] with three of them undergoing additional conversions into aerial refueling tankers, which were designated KC-747[223] and based on specifications for Boeing's entry into the USAF's Advanced Cargo Transport Aircraft (ACTA) program for a new tanker aircraft that ultimately chose the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 as the basis for the proposed tanker, later designated KC-10.[224][225] The only ex-TWA airframe not converted, registration serial N93119, was instead returned to TWA in 1976[226] and continued its service as a passenger airliner for another 20 years until it crashed as TWA Flight 800.[125] The ex-Continental Airlines aircraft, of which only one was converted into a freighter, also did not last long in the IIAF inventory and were all back in service with civilian operators by 1978.[227] The IIAF later ordered five brand new 747-2J9Fs,[228][229] of which only four were delivered between December 1977 and October 1978.[230] The fifth -200F, which was first flown on September 17, 1979, was not delivered to the IIAF due to political tensions between the US and Iran after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. It was instead kept by Boeing until its delivery as a civilian freighter for Northwest Airlines on September 15, 1983.[229][231] The rest of the 747s remained in the inventory of Iran's air force, by then renamed the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF), although some aircraft were transferred to Iran Air.[229][232]

File:Boeing 747-100 of IRIAF taking off from Mehrabad with 2 on the ground.jpg
A Boeing 747-100 of the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF) taking off in front of two other IRIAF 747s parked on the apron at Mehrabad International Airport.

During their service, the Iranian 747s were primarily used to carry troops and cargo, as well as the royal family prior to their overthrow. Their duties remained almost the same after Iran's change of administration.[232] While the nature of the IRIAF 747s' missions was not fully known outside of Iran during their early years in service,[233] they were reported to have been deployed in conflicts such as the Iran–Iraq War, most notably in the H-3 airstrike of 1981 where a KC-747 provided aerial refueling for McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II and Grumman F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft while another 747 acted as an airborne command post.[234][235]

Eventually, the aircraft that remained operational in the 2020s were claimed to have been destroyed by the air forces of the US and Israel. The Israeli Air Force (IAF) claimed the destruction of the last KC-747 tanker during Operation Rising Lion in June 2025,[223] while US missile strikes in March 2026 reportedly destroyed the last operational IRIAF 747-100F, which also happened to be the last operational 747-100 in the world at the time.[236][237]

Other users

The Israeli Air Force (IAF) was also among the air forces that chartered 747s for transport and notably set a record in 1991, when 1,087 passengers were flown in an El Al 747-200C during Operation Solomon, a covert operation to airlift Ethiopian Jews from Addis Ababa to Tel Aviv; two other El Al 747s were also deployed in the operation, carrying 920 passengers each.[186][238] The record set by the El Al 747-200C exceeded the maximum capacity of the 747-400, which typically carried between 416 and 524 passengers,[239] and also broke a record previously held on December 29, 1974, by a Qantas 747-238B, named City of Melbourne, which carried 674 passengers, comprising 306 adults, 328 children, and 40 infants, from Darwin to Sydney following the devastation of Cyclone Tracy.[186]

Other air forces have used 747s for the transport of government officials and other VIPs.[209]

Variants

The 747-100 with a range of 4,620 nautical miles (8,556 km), was the original variant launched in 1966. The 747-200 soon followed, with its launch in 1968 and the shorter 747SP launched in 1973. The 747-300 was launched in 1980 and was followed by the 747-400 in 1985. Ultimately, the 747-8 was announced in 2005. Several versions of each variant have been produced, and many of the early variants were in production simultaneously. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) classifies variants using a shortened code formed by combining the model number and the variant designator (e.g. "B741" for all -100 models).[240]

747-100

File:Boeing 747-121, Pan American World Airways - Pan Am AN1915191.jpg
The original 747-100 has a short upper deck with three windows per side; Pan Am introduced it on January 22, 1970

The first 747-100s were built with six upper deck windows (three per side) to accommodate upstairs lounge areas. Later, as airlines began to use the upper deck for premium passenger seating instead of lounge space, Boeing offered an upper deck with ten windows on either side as an option, which was first applied on airframes built for United Airlines.[241] Some early -100s were retrofitted with the new configuration.[242] The -100 was equipped with Pratt & Whitney JT9D engines and was compatible with the JT9D-1, -3, -3A, -3W, -7, and -7W variants.[20] No freighter or combi versions of this model were developed, but many 747-100s were converted into freighters designated 747-100(SF), the first of which was delivered to Flying Tiger Line in 1974,[243][244] while Sabena converted their pair of 747-100s in April 1974[245] with a combi configuration to carry both passengers and freight on the main deck in response to increased freight loads and minimal passenger demand on the airline's Brussels to New York route.[246] A total of 168 747-100s were built; 167 were delivered to customers, while Boeing kept the prototype, City of Everett.[247] In 1972, its unit cost was US$24 million[248] (Template:Inflation million today).

747SR

Responding to requests from Japanese airlines for a high-capacity aircraft to serve domestic routes between major cities, Boeing developed the 747SR as a short-range version of the 747-100 with lower fuel capacity and greater payload capability. With increased economy class seating, up to 498 passengers could be carried in early versions and up to 550 in later models.[68] Intended for shorter routes and thus more turn arounds, the 747SR had an economic design life objective of 52,000 flights during 20 years of operation, compared to 24,600 flights in 20 years for the standard 747.[249] The initial 747SR model, the -100SR, had a strengthened body structure and landing gear to accommodate the added stress accumulated from a greater number of takeoffs and landings.[250] Extra structural support was built into the wings, fuselage, and the landing gear along with a 20% reduction in fuel capacity.[251]

File:JA8170 B747-146SR SUD JAL Japan Airlines HND 23MAY03 (8473400794).jpg
One of the two 747-100BSR with the stretched upper deck (SUD) made for JAL

The initial order for the -100SR – four aircraft for Japan Air Lines (JAL, later Japan Airlines) – was announced on October 30, 1972; rollout occurred on August 3, 1973, and the first flight took place on August 31, 1973. The type was certified by the FAA on September 26, 1973, with the first delivery on the same day. The -100SR entered service with JAL, the type's sole customer, on October 7, 1973, and typically operated flights within Japan.[42] Seven -100SRs were built between 1973 and 1975, each with a 520,000-pound (240 t) MTOW and Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7A engines derated to 43,000 pounds-force (190 kN) of thrust.[252]

Following the -100SR, Boeing produced the -100BSR, a 747SR variant with increased takeoff weight capability. Debuting in 1978, the -100BSR also incorporated structural modifications for a high cycle-to-flying hour ratio; a related standard -100B model debuted in 1979. The -100BSR first flew on November 3, 1978, with first delivery to All Nippon Airways (ANA) on December 21, 1978. A total of 20 -100BSRs were produced for ANA and JAL.[253] The -100BSR had a 600,000 pounds (270 t) MTOW and was powered by the same JT9D-7A or General Electric CF6-45 engines used on the -100SR. ANA operated this variant on domestic Japanese routes with 455 or 456 seats until retiring its last aircraft in March 2006.[254]

In 1986, two -100BSR SUD models, featuring the stretched upper deck (SUD) of the -300, were produced for JAL.[255] The type's maiden flight occurred on February 26, 1986, with FAA certification and first delivery on March 24, 1986.[256] JAL operated the -100BSR SUD with 563 seats on domestic routes until their retirement in the third quarter of 2006. While only two -100BSR SUDs were produced, in theory, standard -100Bs can be modified to the SUD certification.[253] Overall, 29 Boeing 747SRs were built.[257]

747-100B

Top view of quadjet on apron
EP-IAM, the sole 747-100B of Iran Air and the last 747-100 in passenger service

The 747-100B model was developed from the -100SR,[20] using its stronger airframe and landing gear design. The type had an increased fuel capacity of 48,070 US gal (182,000 L), allowing for a 5,000-nautical-mile (9,300 km; 5,800 mi) range with a typical 452-passenger payload, and an increased MTOW of 750,000 lb (340 t) was offered. The first -100B order, one aircraft for Iran Air, was announced on June 1, 1978. This version first flew on June 20, 1979, received FAA certification on August 1, 1979, and was delivered the next day.[258] Nine -100Bs were built, one for Iran Air and eight for Saudi Arabian Airlines.[259][260] Unlike the original -100, the -100B was offered with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7A, CF6-50, or Rolls-Royce RB211-524 engines. However, only RB211-524 (Saudia) and JT9D-7A (Iran Air) engines were ordered.[261] The last 747-100B, EP-IAM was retired by Iran Air in 2014, the last commercial operator of the 747-100 and -100B.[262]

747SP

Air Namibia 747SP on approach
The 747SP was the only 747 model with a shortened fuselage

The development of the 747SP stemmed from a joint request between Pan American World Airways and Iran Air, who were looking for a high-capacity airliner with enough range to cover Pan Am's New York–Middle Eastern routes and Iran Air's planned Tehran–New York route. The Tehran–New York route, when launched, was the longest non-stop commercial flight in the world. The 747SP is 48 feet 4 inches (14.73 m) shorter than the 747-100. Fuselage sections were eliminated fore and aft of the wing, and the center section of the fuselage was redesigned to fit mating fuselage sections. The SP's flaps used a simplified single-slotted configuration.[263][264] The 747SP, compared to earlier variants, had a tapering of the aft upper fuselage into the empennage, a double-hinged rudder, and longer vertical and horizontal stabilizers.[265] Power was provided by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7(A/F/J/FW) or Rolls-Royce RB211-524 engines.[266]

The 747SP was granted a type certificate on February 4, 1976, and entered service with launch customers Pan Am and Iran Air that same year.[264] The aircraft was chosen by airlines wishing to serve major airports with short runways.[267] A total of 45 747SPs were built,[247] with the 44th 747SP delivered on August 30, 1982. In 1987, Boeing re-opened the 747SP production line after five years to build one last 747SP for an order by the United Arab Emirates government.[264] In addition to airline use, one 747SP was modified for the NASA/German Aerospace Center SOFIA experiment.[268] Iran Air, the last civil operator of the type, retired its final 747-SP (EP-IAC) in June 2016.[269][270]

747-200

Template:Multiple images

While the 747-100 powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-3A engines offered enough payload and range for medium-haul operations, it was marginal for long-haul route sectors. The demand for longer-range aircraft with increased payload quickly led to the improved -200, which featured more powerful engines, increased MTOW, and greater range than the -100. The 747-200 was produced in passenger (-200B), freighter (-200F), convertible (-200C), and combi (-200M) versions[271] and was partly influenced by design inputs from the KSSU airline consortium comprising KLM, Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), Swissair, and Union de Transports Aériens (UTA).[167]

Externally, the appearance of the 747-200 is identical to that of the earlier 747-100.[272] A few -200s retained the early three-window configuration on the upper deck, but most were built with a ten-window configuration on each side starting with the 147th aircraft built, a 747-200B delivered to Qantas.[273][71] Retrofits were also offered to apply the ten-window upper deck configuration on early 747s with the three-window configuration.[274]

The 747-200B was the basic passenger version, with increased fuel capacity and more powerful engines. The prototype 747-200B, an airframe destined for Northwest Airlines (then known as Northwest Orient), was first flown on October 11, 1970, and received FAA certification three weeks before the first delivery was made on January 16, 1971, to launch customer KLM,[71][275] which subsequently flew the type's first revenue service the following month on February 14 from Amsterdam to New York.[74][167] In its first three years of production, the -200 was equipped with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 engines, initially the only engine available. The -200 was later made compatible with the JT9D-7J, -7Q, -7AW, -70A, and -7R4G2 variants throughout its production run.[20] Range with a full passenger load started at over 5,000 nmi (9,300 km; 5,800 mi) and increased to 6,000 nmi (11,000 km; 6,900 mi) with later engines.[276] Extra fuel tanks were installed on two of the 747-200Bs delivered to Japan Airlines in the 1980s to increase the fuel capacity from 158.8 to 164.1 short tons (144.1 to 148.9 t), enabling them to be used on the airline's nonstop flights between Tokyo and New York.[277] Most -200Bs had an internally stretched upper deck, allowing for up to 16 passenger seats.[276]

The freighter model, the 747-200F, had a hinged nose cargo door and could be fitted with an optional side cargo door,[74] and had a capacity of 105 short tons (95 t) and an MTOW of up to 833,000 pounds (378 t). The 747-200F was first flown on October 14, 1971, and entered service with Lufthansa in March 1972.[278][279] The convertible version, the 747-200C, could be converted between a passenger and a freighter or used in mixed configurations,[68] and featured removable seats and a nose cargo door.[74] The -200C could also be outfitted with an optional side cargo door on the main deck.[280] The first -200C rolled out of Boeing's Everett factory on February 28, 1973, and made its maiden flight a month later before its delivery to launch customer World Airways on April 27.[281] The 747-200C's unique feature proved to be beneficial for its operators in maintaining profitable 747 operations through switching between configurations depending on the flow of passenger and freight traffic on their networks. For instance, Martinair flew their 747-200Cs in the 1980s and 1990s as passenger aircraft in the summer and as freighters in the winter.[282]

The combi aircraft model, the 747-200M (originally designated 747-200BC), was based on a configuration first applied in 1974 as a conversion for Sabena's 747-100 fleet[245][283] and could carry freight in the rear section of the main deck via a side cargo door. A removable partition on the main deck separated the cargo area at the rear from the passengers at the front. The -200M could carry up to 238 passengers in a three-class configuration with cargo carried on the main deck. The model was also known as the 747-200 Combi.[74] The first -200M made its maiden flight on November 18, 1974, and was delivered to Air Canada on March 7, 1975.[281] As on the -100, a stretched upper deck (SUD) modification was later offered in the 1980s. Between September 1984 and March 1986, all ten of the CF6-powered 747-200s in KLM's fleet were converted with a process that involved removing half of the upper fuselage up to the leading edge of the wing, where the new SUD section would be installed.[74][284] Two -200 airframes operated by UTA were also modified with the SUD conversion.[284]

The -200 was the first 747 to provide a choice of powerplant from the three major engine manufacturers, namely Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce.[285] After launching the -200 with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 engines on August 1, 1972, Boeing announced that it had reached an agreement with General Electric to certify the 747 with CF6-50 series engines to increase the aircraft's market potential. The CF6-50 was initially tested on the prototype 747 before the first CF6-powered production airframe, a 747-200M, was delivered to KLM in October 1975.[72] The 747-200 was compatible with the CF6-50D and CF6-50E variants.[20] Rolls-Royce followed 747 engine production with the announcement of the RB211-524B engine as an option for the 747 on June 17, 1975, and a launch order from British Airways for four aircraft,[261] the first of which was delivered to the airline on June 16, 1977.[72] Installation of the RB211 on the 747 had been proposed early in the aircraft's development, around 1967 or 1968, to satisfy the demands of BOAC (later merged to form British Airways) for their aircraft to be powered by British-designed engines, but this was not fulfilled until the experimental Hyfil carbon fiber material, which was planned for use in the fan blade assembly, failed a critical test and was discarded in favor of convenetional all-metal materials.[286] The first RB211-powered 747-200 made its maiden flight on September 3, 1976, and received FAA certification in May 1977.[72] Specific variants of the RB211 that were compatible with the 747-200 included the RB211-524B2 and -524C2.[20]

In 1976, its unit cost was US$39M (Template:InflationM today).[citation needed] A total of 393 of the 747-200 versions had been built when production ended in 1991.[287] Of these, 225 were -200B, 73 were -200F, 13 were -200C, 78 were -200M, and 4 were military.[288] Iran Air retired the last passenger 747-200 in May 2016, 36 years after it was delivered.[289] As of July 2019, five 747-200s remain in service as freighters.[290]

747-300

File:Swissair Boeing 747-357 HB-IGF "Zürich" (27487433646).jpg
A 747-300, displaying the stretched upper deck. Swissair took the first delivery on March 23, 1983.[42]

The 747-300 features a 23-foot-4-inch-longer (7.11 m) upper deck than the -200.[75] The stretched upper deck (SUD) has two emergency exit doors and is the most visible difference between the -300 and previous models.[291] After being made standard on the 747-300, the SUD was offered as a retrofit, and as an option to earlier variants still in-production. An example for a retrofit were two UTA -200 Combis being converted in 1986, and an example for the option were two brand-new JAL -100 aircraft (designated -100BSR SUD), the first of which was delivered on March 24, 1986.[73]: 68, 92 

The 747-300 introduced a new straight stairway to the upper deck, instead of a spiral staircase on earlier variants, which creates room above and below for more seats.[68] Minor aerodynamic changes allowed the -300's cruise speed to reach Mach 0.85 compared with Mach 0.84 on the -200 and -100 models, while retaining the same takeoff weight.[75] The -300 could be equipped with the same Pratt & Whitney and Rolls-Royce powerplants as on the -200, as well as updated General Electric CF6-80C2B1 engines.[68]

Swissair placed the first order for the 747-300 on June 11, 1980.[292] The variant revived the 747-300 designation, which had been previously used on a design study that did not reach production. The 747-300 first flew on October 5, 1982, and the type's first delivery went to Swissair on March 23, 1983.[42] In 1982, its unit cost was US$83M (Template:InflationM today). Besides the passenger model, two other versions (-300M, -300SR) were produced. The 747-300M features cargo capacity on the rear portion of the main deck, similar to the -200M, but with the stretched upper deck it can carry more passengers.[266][293] The 747-300SR, a short range, high-capacity domestic model, was produced for Japanese markets with a maximum seating for 584.[294] No production freighter version of the 747-300 was built, but Boeing began modifications of used passenger -300 models into freighters in 2000.[295]

A total of 81 747-300 series aircraft were delivered, 56 for passenger use, 21 -300M and 4 -300SR versions.[296] In 1985, just two years after the -300 entered service, the type was superseded by the announcement of the more advanced 747-400.[297] The last 747-300 was delivered in September 1990 to Sabena.[68][298] While some -300 customers continued operating the type, several large carriers replaced their 747-300s with 747-400s. Air France, Air India, Japan Airlines, Pakistan International Airlines, and Qantas were some of the last major carriers to operate the 747-300. On December 29, 2008, Qantas flew its last scheduled 747-300 service, operating from Melbourne to Los Angeles via Auckland.[299] In July 2015, Pakistan International Airlines retired their final 747-300 after 30 years of service.[300] Mahan Air was the last passenger operator of the 747-300. In 2022, one of their 747-300Ms was leased by Emtrasur Cargo. The 747-300M was later seized by the US Department of Justice in 2024.[301]

747-400

File:The Boeing 747 (3441131089).jpg
The improved 747-400, featuring canted winglets, entered service in February 1989 with Northwest Airlines

The 747-400 is an improved model with increased range. It has wingtip extensions of 6 ft (1.8 m) and winglets of 6 ft (1.8 m), which improve the type's fuel efficiency by four percent compared to previous 747 versions.[302] The 747-400 introduced a new glass cockpit designed for a flight crew of two instead of three, with a reduction in the number of dials, gauges and knobs from 971 to 365 through the use of electronics. The type also features tail fuel tanks, revised engines, and a new interior. The longer range has been used by some airlines to bypass traditional fuel stops, such as Anchorage.[303] A 747-400 loaded with 126,000 pounds (57,000 kg) of fuel flying 3,500 miles (3,000 nmi; 5,600 km) consumes an average of 5 US gallons per mile (12 L/km).[304][305] Powerplants include the Pratt & Whitney PW4062, General Electric CF6-80C2, and Rolls-Royce RB211-524.[306] As a result of the Boeing 767 development overlapping with the 747-400's development, both aircraft can use the same three powerplants and are even interchangeable between the two aircraft models.[307]

The -400 was offered in passenger (-400), freighter (-400F), combi (-400M), domestic (-400D), extended range passenger (-400ER), and extended range freighter (-400ERF) versions. Passenger versions retain the same upper deck as the -300, while the freighter version does not have an extended upper deck.[308] The 747-400D was designed for short-range operations with maximum seating for 624. So winglets were not included though they can be retrofitted.[309][310] Cruising speed is up to Mach 0.855 on different versions of the 747-400.[306]

The passenger version first entered service in February 1989 with launch customer Northwest Airlines on the Minneapolis to Phoenix route.[311] The combi version entered service in September 1989 with KLM, while the freighter version entered service in November 1993 with Cargolux. The 747-400ERF entered service with Air France in October 2002, while the 747-400ER entered service with Qantas,[312] its sole customer, in November 2002. In January 2004, Boeing and Cathay Pacific launched the 747-400 Special Freighter program,[313] later referred to as the Boeing Converted Freighter (BCF), to modify passenger 747-400s for cargo use. The first 747-400BCF was redelivered in December 2005.[314]

In March 2007, Boeing announced that it had no plans to produce further passenger versions of the -400.[315] However, orders for 36 -400F and -400ERF freighters were already in place at the time of the announcement.[315] The last passenger version of the 747-400 was delivered in April 2005 to China Airlines. Some of the last built 747-400s were delivered with Dreamliner livery along with the modern Signature interior from the Boeing 777. A total of 694 of the 747-400 series aircraft were delivered.[247] At various times, the largest 747-400 operator has included Singapore Airlines,[316] Japan Airlines,[316] and British Airways.[317][318] As of July 2019, 331 Boeing 747-400s were in service;[290] there were only 10 Boeing 747-400s in passenger service as of September 2021.

747 LCF Dreamlifter

File:N718BA Boeing 747-4H6(LCF) Dreamlifter (49856836836) (cropped).jpg
The Boeing Dreamlifter, a modified 747-400, first flew on September 9, 2006

The 747-400 Dreamlifter[319] (originally called the 747 Large Cargo Freighter or LCF[320]) is a Boeing-designed modification of existing 747-400s into a larger outsize cargo freighter configuration to ferry 787 Dreamliner sub-assemblies. Evergreen Aviation Technologies Corporation of Taiwan was contracted to complete modifications of 747-400s into Dreamlifters in Taoyuan. The aircraft flew for the first time on September 9, 2006, in a test flight.[321] Modification of four aircraft was completed by February 2010.[322] The Dreamlifters have been placed into service transporting sub-assemblies for the 787 program to the Boeing plant in Everett, Washington, for final assembly.[319] The aircraft is certified to carry only essential crew with no passengers.[323]

747-8

Side view of quadjet over clouds
The stretched and re-engined 747-8 made its maiden flight on February 8, 2010, as a freighter

Boeing announced a new 747 variant, the 747-8, on November 14, 2005. Referred to as the 747 Advanced prior to its launch, Boeing selected the designation 747-8 to show the connection with the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, as the aircraft would use technology and the General Electric GEnx engines from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems.[324][325][326] The variant is designed to be quieter, more economical, and more environmentally friendly. The 747-8's fuselage is lengthened from 232 feet (71 m) to 251 feet (77 m),[327] marking the first stretch variant of the aircraft.

File:Lufthansa Boeing 747-830 D-ABYT "Retro" (29988018323).jpg
A 747-8I, the passenger variant of the -8 series, of launch customer Lufthansa. This example is painted with a retro livery modeled after the livery worn by Lufthansa's 747 fleet from the 1970s to 1980s.

The 747-8 Freighter, or 747-8F, has 16% more payload capacity than its predecessor, allowing it to carry seven more standard air cargo containers, with a maximum payload capacity of 154 short tons (140 t) of cargo.[328] As on previous 747 freighters, the 747-8F features a flip up nose-door, a side-door on the main deck, and a side-door on the lower deck ("belly") to aid loading and unloading. The 747-8F made its maiden flight on February 8, 2010.[329][330] The variant received its amended type certificate jointly from the FAA and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on August 19, 2011.[331] The -8F was first delivered to Cargolux on October 12, 2011.[332]

The passenger version, named 747-8 Intercontinental or 747-8I, is designed to carry up to 467 passengers in a 3-class configuration and fly more than 8,000 nautical miles (15,000 km; 9,200 mi) at Mach 0.855. As a derivative of the already common 747-400, the 747-8I has the economic benefit of similar training and interchangeable parts.[333] The type's first test flight occurred on March 20, 2011.[334] The 747-8 has surpassed the Airbus A340-600 as the world's longest airliner, a record it would hold until the 777X, which first flew in 2020. The first -8I was delivered in May 2012 to Lufthansa.[335] The 747-8 received 155 total orders, including 106 for the -8F and 47 for the -8I as of June 2021.[247] The final 747-8F was delivered to Atlas Air on January 31, 2023, marking the end of the production of the Boeing 747 series.[108] The final aircraft was registered as N863GT.[336]

Government, military, and other variants

File:Air Force One over Mt. Rushmore.jpg
Air Force One, a Boeing VC-25, over Mount Rushmore
Silhouette diagram of 747 airborne aircraft carrier aircraft
747 "airborne aircraft carrier" concept
File:Atlantis on Shuttle Carrier Aircraft.jpg
Shuttle Carrier Aircraft carrying a Space Shuttle orbiter
File:American Boeing 747 Refuels an Iranian Boeing 747.jpg
Imperial Iranian Air Force (IIAF) KC-747 tanker refueling a standard IIAF 747-100F. The KC-747 is still wearing the livery of its former operator, TWA.
  • VC-25 – This aircraft is the U.S. Air Force very important person (VIP) version of the 747-200B. The U.S. Air Force operates two of them in VIP configuration as the VC-25A. Tail numbers 28000 and 29000 are popularly known as Air Force One, which is technically the air-traffic call sign for any United States Air Force aircraft carrying the U.S. president.[337] Partially completed aircraft from Everett, Washington, were flown to Wichita, Kansas, for final outfitting by Boeing Military Airplane Company.[338] Two new aircraft, based around the 747-8, are being procured which will be designated as VC-25B.[339]
  • E-4B – This is an airborne command post designed for use in nuclear war. Three E-4As, based on the 747-200B, with a fourth aircraft, with more powerful engines and upgraded systems delivered in 1979 as an E-4B, with the three E-4As upgraded to this standard.[340][341] Formerly known as the National Emergency Airborne Command Post (referred to colloquially as "Kneecap"), this type is now referred to as the National Airborne Operations Center (NAOC).[341][342]
  • YAL-1 – This was the experimental Airborne Laser, a planned component of the U.S. National Missile Defense.[345]
  • Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) – Two 747s were modified to carry the Space Shuttle orbiter. The first was a 747-100 (N905NA), and the other was a 747-100SR (N911NA). The first SCA carried the prototype Enterprise during the Approach and Landing Tests in the late 1970s. The two SCA later carried all five operational Space Shuttle orbiters.[346]
  • C-33 – This aircraft was a proposed U.S. military version of the 747-400F intended to augment the C-17 fleet. The plan was canceled in favor of additional C-17s.[347]
  • KC-25/33 – A proposed 747-200F was also adapted as an aerial refueling tanker and was bid against the DC-10-30 during the 1970s Advanced Cargo Transport Aircraft (ACTA) program that produced the KC-10 Extender. Before the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran bought four 747-100 aircraft with air-refueling boom conversions to support its fleet of F-4 Phantoms and F-14 Tomcats.[223][225] The last of the Iranian tankers was claimed to be destroyed by the Israeli Air Force (IAF) during Operation Rising Lion in June 2025.[223] Since then, there have been proposals to use a 747-400 for that role.[348]
  • 747F Airlifter – Proposed US military transport version of the 747-200F intended as an alternative to further purchases of the C-5 Galaxy. This 747 would have had a special nose jack to lower the sill height for the nose door. System tested in 1980 on a Flying Tiger Line 747-200F.[349]
  • 747 CMCA – This "Cruise Missile Carrier Aircraft" variant was considered by the U.S. Air Force during the development of the B-1 Lancer strategic bomber. It would have been equipped with 50 to 100 AGM-86 ALCM cruise missiles on rotary launchers. This plan was abandoned in favor of more conventional strategic bombers.[350]
  • MC-747 – Two separate studies from the 1970s and 2005, the first by Boeing and the second by ATK and BAE Systems, to horizontally store up to four Peacekeeper ICBMs or seven Minutemen above bomb bay-like doors in the first study,[351][352] and to vertically store twelve Minutemen or 32 JDAM-equipped conventional missiles for launch from in situ tubes in the second.[353][354]
  • 747 AAC – A Boeing study under contract from the USAF for an "airborne aircraft carrier" for up to 10 Boeing Model 985-121 "microfighters" with the ability to launch, retrieve, re-arm, and refuel. Boeing believed that the scheme would be able to deliver a flexible and fast carrier platform with global reach, particularly where other bases were not available. Modified versions of the 747-200 and Lockheed C-5A were considered as the base aircraft. The concept, which included a complementary 747 AWACS version with two reconnaissance "microfighters", was considered technically feasible in 1973.[355]
  • Evergreen 747 Supertanker – A 747-200 modified as an aerial application platform for fire fighting using 20,000 US gallons (76,000 L) of firefighting chemicals.[356]
  • Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) – A former Pan Am 747SP modified to carry a large infrared-sensitive telescope, in a joint venture of NASA and DLR. High altitudes are needed for infrared astronomy, to rise above infrared-absorbing water vapor in the atmosphere.[357][358]
  • A number of other governments also use the 747 as a VIP transport, including Bahrain, Brunei, India, Iran, Japan, Kuwait, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Several 747-8s have been ordered by Boeing Business Jet for conversion to VIP transports for several unidentified customers.[359]

Comparison

Below is a list of major differences between the original 747 variants.

  1. 1.0 1.1 JT9D, 366 passengers and baggage
  2. 400 passengers and baggage

Proposed variants

Boeing studied a number of 747 variants that did not advance beyond the concept stage.

747 trijet

During the late 1960s and early 1970s, Boeing studied the development of a shorter 747 with three engines, to compete with the smaller Lockheed L-1011 TriStar and McDonnell Douglas DC-10. The center engine would have been fitted in the tail with an S-duct intake similar to the L-1011's. Overall, the 747 trijet would have had more payload, range, and passenger capacity than either of the two other aircraft. However, engineering studies showed that a major redesign of the 747 wing would be necessary. Maintaining the same 747 handling characteristics would be important to minimize pilot retraining. Boeing decided instead to pursue a shortened four-engine 747, resulting in the 747SP.[362]

747-500

In January 1986, Boeing outlined preliminary studies to build a larger, ultra-long haul version named the 747-500, which would enter service in the mid- to late-1990s. The aircraft derivative would use engines evolved from unducted fan (UDF) (propfan) technology by General Electric, but the engines would have shrouds, sport a bypass ratio of 15–20, and have a propfan diameter of 10–12 feet (3.0–3.7 m).[363] The aircraft would be stretched (including the upper deck section) to a capacity of 500 seats, have a new wing to reduce drag, cruise at a faster speed to reduce flight times, and have a range of at least 8,700 nmi; 16,000 km, which would allow airlines to fly nonstop between London, UK and Sydney, Australia.[364]

747 ASB

Boeing announced the 747 ASB (Advanced Short Body) in 1986 as a response to the Airbus A340 and the McDonnell Douglas MD-11. This aircraft design would have combined the advanced technology used on the 747-400 with the foreshortened 747SP fuselage. The aircraft was to carry 295 passengers over a range of 8,000 nmi (15,000 km; 9,200 mi).[365] However, airlines were not interested in the project and it was canceled later that year.

747-500X, -600X, and -700X

Aircraft comparison diagram.
The proposed 747-500X and -600X as depicted in a 1998 FAA illustration

Boeing announced the 747-500X and -600X at the 1996 Farnborough Airshow.[82] The proposed models would have combined the 747's fuselage with a new wing spanning 251 feet (77 m) derived from the 777. Other changes included adding more powerful engines and increasing the number of tires from two to four on the nose landing gear and from 16 to 20 on the main landing gear.[366]

The 747-500X concept featured a fuselage length increased by 18 feet (5.5 m) to 250 feet (76 m), and the aircraft was to carry 462 passengers over a range up to 8,700 nautical miles (16,100 km; 10,000 mi), with a gross weight of over 1.0 Mlb (450 tonnes).[366] The 747-600X concept featured a greater stretch to 279 feet (85 m) with seating for 548 passengers, a range of up to 7,700 nmi (14,300 km; 8,900 mi), and a gross weight of 1.2 Mlb (540 tonnes).[366] A third study concept, the 747-700X, would have combined the wing of the 747-600X with a widened fuselage, allowing it to carry 650 passengers over the same range as a 747-400.[82] The cost of the changes from previous 747 models, especially the new wing for the 747-500X and -600X, was estimated to be more than US$5 billion.[82] Boeing was not able to attract enough interest to launch the aircraft.[83]

747X and 747X Stretch

As Airbus progressed with its A3XX study, Boeing offered a 747 derivative as an alternative in 2000; a more modest proposal than the previous -500X and -600X with the 747's overall wing design and a new segment at the root, increasing the span to 229 ft (69.8 m).[367] Power would have been supplied by either the Engine Alliance GP7172 or the Rolls-Royce Trent 600, which were also proposed for the 767-400ERX.[368] A new flight deck based on the 777's would be used. The 747X aircraft was to carry 430 passengers over ranges of up to 8,700 nmi (16,100 km; 10,000 mi). The 747X Stretch would be extended to 263 ft (80.2 m) long, allowing it to carry 500 passengers over ranges of up to 7,800 nmi (14,400 km; 9,000 mi).[367] Both would feature an interior based on the 777.[369] Freighter versions of the 747X and 747X Stretch were also studied.[370]

Side view of quadjet in flight
The 747-400ER was derived from the 747-400X study.

Like its predecessor, the 747X family was unable to garner enough interest to justify production, and it was shelved along with the 767-400ERX in March 2001, when Boeing announced the Sonic Cruiser concept.[84] Though the 747X design was less costly than the 747-500X and -600X, it was criticized for not offering a sufficient advance from the existing 747-400. The 747X did not make it beyond the drawing board, but the 747-400X being developed concurrently moved into production to become the 747-400ER.[371]

747-400XQLR

After the end of the 747X program, Boeing continued to study improvements that could be made to the 747. The 747-400XQLR (Quiet Long Range) was meant to have an increased range of 7,980 nmi (14,780 km; 9,180 mi), with improvements to boost efficiency and reduce noise.[372][373] Improvements studied included raked wingtips similar to those used on the 767-400ER and a sawtooth engine nacelle for noise reduction.[374] Although the 747-400XQLR did not move to production, many of its features were used for the 747 Advanced, which was launched as the 747-8 in 2005.[375]

Operators

The 747 was utilized by various airlines from the Asia-Pacific region, the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.[376] Historically, it was the primary long-haul aircraft for operators like Air France, Air New Zealand, British Airways, Cathay Pacific, Japan Airlines, Lufthansa, Northwest Airlines, Pan Am, Qantas, Singapore Airlines, and United Airlines.[161] Qantas notably became the first airline in the world to operate an all-747 fleet after the retirement of its last 707 in 1979. In 1984, Qantas operated a total of 25 aircraft.[170][377]

During the Cold War, Boeing refused to sell 747s to the Soviet Union due to political tensions and suspicions of industrial espionage raised in the 1970s after delegates from the Soviet Ministry of Aviation Industry visited the Everett factory, in the guise of negotiating for the purchase of 25 747s, and attempted to obtain copies of a document pertaining to the 747's design objectives and criteria, which the design team successfully prevented.[378][379]

As of July 2019, there were 462 Boeing 747s in airline service, with Atlas Air and British Airways being the largest operators with 33 747-400s each.[380]

The last US passenger Boeing 747 was retired from Delta Air Lines in December 2017. The model flew for almost every American major carrier since its 1970 introduction.[381] Delta flew three of its last four aircraft on a farewell tour, from Seattle to Atlanta on December 19 then to Los Angeles and Minneapolis/St Paul on December 20.[382]

As the IATA forecast an increase in air freight from 4% to 5% in 2018 fueled by booming trade for time-sensitive goods, from smartphones to fresh flowers, demand for freighters is strong while passenger 747s are phased out. Of the 1,574 produced, 890 are retired; as of 2018, a small subset of those which were intended to be parted-out got $3 million D-checks before flying again. Young -400s were sold for 320 million yuan ($50 million) and Boeing stopped converting freighters, which used to cost nearly $30 million. This comeback helped the airframer financing arm Boeing Capital to shrink its exposure to the 747-8 from $1.07 billion in 2017 to $481 million in 2018.[383]

In July 2020, British Airways announced that it was retiring its 747 fleet.[384][385] The final British Airways 747 flights departed London Heathrow on October 8, 2020.[386][387]

Orders and deliveries

Year Total 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Orders 1,573 5 1 13 6 18 6 2 13 7 3 1 5 2 16 53
Deliveries 1,573 1 5 7 5 7 6 14 9 18 19 24 31 9 8 14 16 14
Year 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986
Orders 46 10 4 17 16 26 35 15 36 56 32 16 2 23 31 122 56 49 66 84
Deliveries 13 15 19 27 31 25 47 53 39 26 25 40 56 61 64 70 45 24 23 35
Year 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966
Orders 42 23 24 14 23 49 72 76 42 14 20 29 29 18 7 20 30 22 43 83
Deliveries 24 16 22 26 53 73 67 32 20 27 21 22 30 30 69 92 4

Boeing 747 orders and deliveries (cumulative, by year):

Ploticus could not be executed: /opt/ploticus/src/pl is not an executable file. Make sure $wgTimelinePloticusCommand is set correctly.
  Orders   Deliveries — as of February 2023

Model summary

Model Series ICAO code[240] Deliveries
747-100 B741 / BSCA[lower-alpha 1] 167 205
747-100B 9
747-100SR B74R 29
747SP B74S 45 45
747-200B B742 225[lower-alpha 2] 393
747-200C 13
747-200F 73
747-200M 78
747 E-4A 3[lower-alpha 3]
747 E-4B 1
747-300 B743 56 81
747-300M 21
747-300SR 4
747-400 B744 / BLCF[lower-alpha 4] 442 694
747-400ER 6
747-400ERF 40
747-400F 126
747-400M 61
747-400D B74D 19
747-8I B748 48 155
747-8F 107
747 Total 1,573
  1. BSCA refers to 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, used by NASA.
  2. Includes the VC-25A, two heavily modified 747-200Bs used for presidential transport by the U.S. Air Force.
  3. All aircraft were later converted to E-4Bs.[388]
  4. BLCF refers to the 747-400LCF Dreamlifter, used to transport components for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner program.

Orders and deliveries through to the end of February 2023.

Accidents and incidents

As of November 2023, the 747 has been involved in 173 aviation accidents and incidents,[389] including 65 hull losses (53 in-flight accidents),[390] causing 3,746 fatalities.[391] There have been several hijackings of Boeing 747s, such as Pan Am Flight 73, a 747-100 hijacked by four terrorists, resulting in 20 deaths.[392] The 747 also fell victim to several mid-air bombings, two of which resulted in major fatalities and hull losses, Air India Flight 182 in 1985, and Pan Am Flight 103 in 1988.[393][394][395]

The deadliest aviation accident, the Tenerife airport disaster, resulted from pilot error and communications failure, while the Japan Air Lines Flight 123 and China Airlines Flight 611 crashes stemmed from improper aircraft repair due to a tail-strike. Korean Air Lines Flight 007 was shot down by a Soviet Su-15TM interceptor in 1983 after it had violated Soviet airspace for over 12 minutes, causing US President Ronald Reagan to authorize the then-strictly-military global positioning system (GPS) for civilian use.[396][397] South African Airways Flight 295, a 747-200M Combi, which crashed on 28 November 1987 due to an in-flight fire, led to the mandate of adding fire-suppression systems on board Combi variants.[398][399]

A handful of crashes have been attributed to 747 design flaws, mainly older 747 classic (100/200/300/SP) variants. United Airlines Flight 811, which suffered an explosive decompression mid-flight on February 24, 1989, led the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to issue a recommendation that the Boeing 747-100 and 747-200 cargo doors similar to those on the Flight 811 aircraft be modified to those featured on the Boeing 747-400. TWA Flight 800, a 747-100 that exploded in mid-air on July 17, 1996 due to sparking from the old and cracked electrical wires inside the fuel tank, where voltage levels exceeded the maximum limit, causing ignition of the fuel vapors inside the tank.[400] This finding led the FAA to adopt a rule in July 2008 requiring installation of an inerting system in the center fuel tank of most large aircraft, after years of research into solutions. At the time, the new safety system was expected to cost US$100,000 to $450,000 per aircraft and weigh approximately 200 pounds (91 kg).[401] Two 747-200F freighters - China Airlines Flight 358 on December 29, 1991, and El Al Flight 1862 on October 4, 1992, crashed after the fuse pins for an engine (no. 3) broke off shortly after take-off due to metal fatigue, and instead of simply dropping away from the wing, the engine knocked off the adjacent engine and damaged the wing.[402] Following these crashes, Boeing issued a directive to examine and replace all fuse pins found to be cracked. The lack of adequate warning systems combined with flight crew error led to a preventable crash of Lufthansa Flight 540 in November 1974, which was the first fatal crash of a 747,[403][404] while an instrument malfunction leading to crew disorientation caused the crash of Air India Flight 855 on New Years Day in 1978.[405][406]

Other incidents did not result in any hull losses, but the planes suffered certain damages and were put back into service after repair. On July 30, 1971, Pan Am Flight 845 struck approach lighting system structures while taking off from San Francisco for Tokyo, Japan; the plane dumped fuel and landed back. The cause was pilot error with improper calculations, and the plane was repaired and returned to service.[407] On June 24, 1982, British Airways Flight 9, a Boeing 747-200, registration G-BDXH, flew through a cloud of volcanic ash and dust from the eruption of Mount Galunggung, suffering an all engine flameout; the crew restarted the engines and successfully landed at Jakarta. The volcanic ash caused windscreens to be sandblasted along with engine damage and paint rip-off; the plane was repaired with engines replaced and returned to service.[408] On December 11, 1994, on board Philippine Airlines Flight 434 from Manila to Tokyo via Cebu, a bomb exploded under a seat, killing one passenger; the plane landed safely at Okinawa despite damage to the plane's controls. The bomber, Ramzi Yousef, was caught on 7 February 1995 in Islamabad, Pakistan, and the plane was repaired, but converted for cargo use.[409]

Preserved aircraft

Aircraft on display

Ventral view of museum aircraft raised on struts.
Boeing 747-230B in Lufthansa livery on display at the Technikmuseum Speyer in Germany
A parked museum aircraft on static display
Boeing 747-128 on display at the Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace in France
File:VH-OJA City of Canberra.jpg
VH-OJA City of Canberra at HARS, Shellharbour Airport

As increasing numbers of "classic" 747-100 and 747-200 series aircraft have been retired, some have been used for other uses such as museum displays. Some older 747-300s and 747-400s were later added to museum collections.

Other uses

A parked aircraft on a grassy field.
Boeing 747-212B serving as the Jumbo Stay at Arlanda Airport, Sweden

Upon its retirement from service, the 747 which was number two in the production line was dismantled and shipped to Hopyeong, Namyangju, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea where it was re-assembled, repainted in a livery similar to that of Air Force One and converted into a restaurant. Originally flown commercially by Pan Am as N747PA, Clipper Juan T. Trippe, and repaired for service following a tailstrike, it stayed with the airline until its bankruptcy. The restaurant closed by 2009,[438] and the aircraft was scrapped in 2010.[439]

A former British Airways 747-200B, G-BDXJ, is parked at the Dunsfold Aerodrome in Surrey, England and has been used as a movie set for productions such as the 2006 James Bond film, Casino Royale using the fictional registration N88892 and N9747P.[440][441] The airplane also appears frequently in the television series Top Gear, which is filmed at Dunsfold.

The Jumbo Stay hostel, using a converted 747-200 formerly operated by Singapore Airlines and registered as 9V-SQE, opened at Arlanda Airport, Stockholm in January 2009.[442][443] It closed in March 2025 after the owner declared bankruptcy.[444]

A former Pakistan International Airlines 747-300 was converted into a restaurant by Pakistan's Airports Security Force in 2017.[445] It is located at Jinnah International Airport, Karachi.[446]

The wings of a 747 have been repurposed as roofs of a house in Malibu, California.[447][448][449][450]

In 2023, a Boeing 747-412, retired from Lion Air, was turned into a steak restaurant in Bekasi, Indonesia. The aircraft had been sitting since 2018 but the construction of the restaurant was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[451][452]

Two used 747-400s were cannibalized to build the Scaled Composites Stratolaunch aircraft.[453]

Specifications (Boeing 747-200B, with JT9D-7R4G2 engines)

A comparison of the different 747 variants
Diagram of Boeing 747 variants.
At the top: 747-100 (dorsal, cross-section, and front views). Side views, in descending order: 747SP, 747-100, 747-400, 747-8I, and 747LCF.

Template:Aircraft specs

Cultural impact

File:American Airlines C.R. Smith Museum May 2019 21 (Wurlitzer electronic piano).jpg
American Airlines 747 Wurlitzer electronic piano, 1971

Following its debut, the 747 rapidly achieved iconic status. The aircraft entered the cultural lexicon as the original Jumbo Jet, a term coined by the aviation media to describe its size,[454] and was also nicknamed Queen of the Skies.[455] Test pilot David P. Davies described it as "a most impressive aeroplane with a number of exceptionally fine qualities",[456]: 249  and praised its flight control system as "truly outstanding" because of its redundancy.[456]: 256 

Appearing in over 300 film productions,[457] the 747 is one of the most widely depicted civilian aircraft and is considered by many as one of the most iconic in film history.[458] It has appeared in film productions such as the disaster films Airport 1975 and Airport '77, as well as Air Force One, Die Hard 2, and Executive Decision.[459][460]

Beyond its media presence, the 747's interior configuration introduced a physical social hierarchy within commercial aviation. With an increased seating capacity on the lower deck, ticket prices decreased and made long-haul travel more accessible.[461] The upper deck promoted luxury, featuring sofas, bars, and premium amenities that began the formalization of the modern business and first-class cabin.[462] This separation of classes established a precedent for class differentiation in the wide-body aircraft design.[citation needed]

See also

Template:Aircontent

References

Notes

  1. Thomas, Geoffrey (June 13, 2008). "Boeing under pressure as demand rises for fuel-saver 777". The Australian. Archived from the original on April 30, 2014. Retrieved June 20, 2008.
  2. Zhang, Benjamin (March 21, 2019). "Boeing quietly unveiled the $442 million airliner that will replace the 747 jumbo jet". Business Insider. Retrieved May 31, 2026.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Norton 2003, pp. 5–12.
  4. Boeing CX-HLS Model, Boeing Corporate Archives, 1963/64.
    Models of Boeing C-5A proposal and Lockheed's Archived September 12, 2016, at the Wayback Machine (Korean); next page.
  5. "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom." Archived December 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine NASA, 2000, see images in "Langley Contributions to the C-5". Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  6. Jenkins 2000, pp. 12–13.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 13.
  8. "Boeing Multimedia Image Gallery 707". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on January 11, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2007.
  9. Branson, Richard (December 7, 1998). "Pilot of the Jet Age". Time. Archived from the original on December 11, 2022. Retrieved December 11, 2022.
  10. "Innovators: Juan Trippe". Chasing the Sun. PBS. Archived from the original on May 8, 2006.
  11. Sutter 2006, pp. 80–84.
  12. "Air travel, a supersonic future?". BBC News, July 17, 2001. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.
  13. Slutsken, Howard (November 7, 2017). "How Boeing's 747 jumbo jet changed travel". CNN. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
  14. "490-seat jetliner ordered". Lewiston Morning Tribune. Idaho. Associated Press. April 14, 1966. p. 1.
  15. "Pan Am orders giant jets". Deseret News. Salt Lake City, Utah. UPI. April 14, 1966. p. A1.
  16. Simons, Graham (2014). The Airbus A380: A History. Pen and Sword. p. 31. ISBN 978-1-78303-041-5.
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 Rumerman, Judy. "The Boeing 747". U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission, 2003. Retrieved: April 30, 2006.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Noland, David. "Passenger Planes: Boeing 747." "Info please" (Pearson Education). Retrieved: April 30, 2006.
  19. Irving 1994, p. 359.
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 Green, Swanborough & Mowinski 1987, p. 76.
  21. "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom." Archived December 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine NASA, 2000. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  22. Boeing 747 "Double Decker" Early Proposed Design Model at Boeing Corporate Archives – mid-to-late 1960s Archived May 12, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
    (alternate image) Archived May 12, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
  23. Irving 1994, p. 282.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 Sutter 2006, p. 93.
  25. Jenkins 2000, p. 17.
  26. "Airwaysnews Resources and Information". airwaysnews.com. Archived from the original on June 16, 2015.
  27. Mecham, M. "In review: 747, Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation." Aviation Week and Space Technology, Vol. 165, No. 9, September 4, 2006, p. 53.
  28. "GE Aviation: CF6." Archived December 17, 2007, at the Wayback Machine GE Aviation. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Colson, Michael S. "Mechanical Engineering 100 Years of Flight." Archived December 26, 2007, at the Wayback Machine memagazine.org. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.
  30. Sutter 2006, pp. 121, 128–131.
  31. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 25–26.
  32. Rudolph, Peter (September 1996). "High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners" (PDF). NASA Contractor Report. NASA. Bibcode:1996ntrs.rept52267R. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  33. Jenkins 2000, p. 19.
  34. Sutter 2006, pp. 96–97.
  35. Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 19.
  36. 36.0 36.1 Sutter 2006, p. 132.
  37. Seo 1984, p. 40.
  38. "747 cut forces Northrop Grumman to take pre-tax charge". FlightGlobal. January 13, 1999. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
  39. Serling 1992, p. 391.
  40. Pascall, Glenn R. "Everett and Renton react differently to Boeing". Puget Sound Business Journal, September 26, 2003. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  41. 41.0 41.1 "Major Production Facilities – Everett, Washington". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on November 15, 2007. Retrieved April 28, 2007.
  42. 42.0 42.1 42.2 42.3 "747 Milestones." Archived May 24, 2011, at the Wayback Machine The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  43. Boyer, Tom. "Boeing legend Malcolm Stamper dies". Seattle Times, June 17, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  44. Irving 1994, p. 310.
  45. Irving 1994, p. 365.
  46. Irving 1994, p. 383.
  47. "History – 747 Commercial Transport". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on March 16, 2010. Retrieved April 29, 2006.
  48. "Building a legend". Flight International. June 24, 1989.
  49. "All but off the Ground". Time, October 4, 1968. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  50. "The Giant Takes Off". Time. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  51. "Boeing 747, the Queen of the Skies" and "Celebrates 35th Anniversary". The Boeing Company. February 9, 2004. Archived from the original on December 7, 2004. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  52. Irving 1994, p. 417-418.
  53. 53.0 53.1 Serling 1992, p. 314.
  54. Vortex Wake Turbulence: Flight Tests Conducted During 1970 (PDF). NASA. February 1, 1971. pp. 17–18.
  55. Irving 1994, p. 428.
  56. Uijt de Haag, P. A. M.; Smetsers, R. C. G. M.; Witlox, H. W. M.; Krüs, H. W.; Eisenga, A. H. M. (2000). "Evaluating the risk from depleted uranium after the Boeing 747-258F crash in Amsterdam, 1992" (PDF). Journal of Hazardous Materials. 76 (1): 39–58. Bibcode:2000JHzM...76...39U. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00183-7. ISSN 0304-3894. PMID 10863013. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  57. van der Keur, Henk. "Uranium Pollution from the Amsterdam 1992 Plane Crash". Laka Foundation, May 1999. Retrieved: May 16, 2007.
  58. Irving 1994, pp. 441–446.
  59. "The Trouble with Jumbo". Time, September 26, 1969.
  60. Irving 1994, p. 436.
  61. "Aircraft Incident Report 5-0046" (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. August 26, 1970. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  62. "The Paris Air Show in facts and figures." Archived October 31, 2015, at the Wayback Machine Reuters, June 14, 2007. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.
  63. "Boeing 747-400". Jane's All the World's Aircraft, October 31, 2000. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
  64. 64.0 64.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 48.
  65. Irving 1994, pp. 437–438.
  66. 66.0 66.1 Heppenheimer, T. A. (1998). The Space Shuttle Decision. NASA. pp. 302=303.
  67. "Jumbo challenge". Flightglobal. November 6, 1997. Archived from the original on June 21, 2013. Retrieved July 15, 2011.
  68. 68.0 68.1 68.2 68.3 68.4 68.5 68.6 68.7 "Boeing 747 Classics". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
  69. "Solutions Center." Archived October 15, 2015, at the Wayback Machine The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  70. "Boeing 747SP." Archived October 30, 2006, at the Wayback Machine Airliners.net. Retrieved: November 23, 2007.
  71. 71.0 71.1 71.2 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 54.
  72. 72.0 72.1 72.2 72.3 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 56.
  73. 73.0 73.1 Bowman, Martin W. (2000). Boeing 747. Marlborough: Crowood. ISBN 1-86126-242-6. OCLC 42912717.
  74. 74.0 74.1 74.2 74.3 74.4 74.5 "Aircraft Owner's and Operator's Guide: 747-200/300"(PDF). Archived October 9, 2011, at the Wayback MachineAircraft Commerce. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
  75. 75.0 75.1 75.2 "Boeing 747-300". Airliners.net. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.
  76. Sutter 2006, p. 258.
  77. 77.0 77.1 Sutter 2006, pp. 258–259.
  78. Lawrence and Thornton 2005, p. 54.
  79. Salpukas, Agis. "J.A.L. Orders 15 More of Boeing's 747-400s". Time, July 1, 1988. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  80. 80.0 80.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 88.
  81. Malik, Tariq (April 13, 2019). "Stratolaunch Flies World's Largest Plane for the First Time". Space.com. Retrieved April 17, 2025.
  82. 82.0 82.1 82.2 82.3 82.4 "Boeing Outlines the "Value" of Its 747 Plans". The Boeing Company. September 2, 1996. Archived from the original on October 24, 2008. Retrieved June 7, 2011.
  83. 83.0 83.1 "BA warms to A3XX plan". Flight International, March 19, 1997. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  84. 84.0 84.1 "Boeing Shelves 747X to Focus on Faster Jet". People's Daily, March 30, 2001. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  85. Taylor, Alex III. "Boeing's Amazing Sonic Cruiser…" Fortune, December 9, 2002. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  86. "Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400". The Boeing Company. November 28, 2000. Archived from the original on July 6, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  87. Holmes, Stanley. "Boeing's Reborn 747." Archived December 8, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Business Week, November 16, 2005.
  88. "A380 superjumbo lands in Sydney". BBC News. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.
  89. "Boeing Launches New 747-8 Family". The Boeing Company. November 14, 2005. Archived from the original on November 24, 2005. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  90. "Downhill for the jumbo." Archived February 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine The Sydney Morning Herald, January 9, 2009. Retrieved: February 9, 2009.
  91. Ostrower, Jon. "Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight". Flightglobal.com, February 8, 2010.
  92. "Boeing Sets 747-8 Freighter Delivery Schedule for Mid-Year 2011". The Boeing Company, September 30, 2010.
  93. Trimble, Stephen. "Boeing pushes 747-8F delivery back to mid-2011/" Air Transport Intelligence News via Flight global, September 30, 2010. Retrieved: February 22, 2011.
  94. "Lufthansa conducts inaugural flight of world's first Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental passenger aircraft from Frankfurt to Washington, D.C." (Press release). Boeing. June 1, 2012.
  95. "Boeing Delivers 1,500th 747". Boeing, June 28, 2014.
  96. "Jumbo jet demise draws a step closer". Financial Times. January 22, 2016. Archived from the original on December 10, 2022.
  97. Ostrower, Jon (January 22, 2016). "Boeing to Cut Production of 747s". The Wall Street Journal.
  98. "Boeing starts work on replacing Air Force One". Air Force Times. February 1, 2016.
  99. "Volga-Dnepr Group acquires 20 Boeing 747-8 freighters". Air Transport World. July 12, 2016.
  100. The Boeing Company (July 27, 2016). "Form 10-Q Quarterly report" (PDF). Securities and Exchange Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. it is reasonably possible that we could decide to end production of the 747
  101. "Boeing's 747 Struggles Indicate Large-Aircraft Market Decline". Aviation Week. August 1, 2016.
  102. "Boeing: UPS Orders 14 Additional 747-8 Freighters, Plus Four 767 Freighters". boeing.com. Retrieved March 10, 2018.
  103. "Fifty years on, Boeing's 747 clings to life as cargo carrier". Reuters. February 8, 2019.
  104. "UPS orders 14 747-8 Freighters". Flight Global. October 27, 2016.
  105. Johnsson, Julie (July 2, 2020). "Boeing Quietly Pulls Plug on the 747, Closing Era of Jumbo Jets". Bloomberg.
  106. Hemmerdinger, Jon (July 29, 2020). "Boeing slashes output, delays 777X to 2022 and confirms end for 747". Flightglobal. Retrieved August 3, 2020.
  107. Josephs, Leslie (December 6, 2022). "Boeing's last 747 has rolled out of the factory after a more than 50-year production run". CNBC.
  108. 108.0 108.1 Chokshi, Niraj; Menghistab, Meron Tekie; Tamayo, Jovelle; Wasson, Lindsey (January 31, 2023). "The Last Boeing 747 Leaves the Factory". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
  109. "Boeing bids farewell to an icon, delivers last 747 jumbo jet". Associated Press. January 31, 2023. Retrieved February 1, 2023.
  110. Bowers 1989, p. 508.
  111. "Airplane description" (PDF). May 1984. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 19, 2006. Retrieved June 19, 2006. The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  112. Serling 1992, p. 393.
  113. Seo 1984, p. 24.
  114. The Flight Detective (March 12, 2022). "Wait, what?! Philippine Airlines had actual beds upstairs on the Boeing 747?". TravelUpdate.
  115. Caprino, Mariann (September 5, 1986). "Pan Am blames hijack on lapse in airport security". New York. United Press International.
  116. Spar, Penny (September 5, 1986). "The escape hatch used by the Pan Am cockpit..." Seattle. United Press International.
  117. "Boeing 747-100/200/300 Technical Specifications". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  118. "Boeing 747-8 Technical Specifications". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  119. Sutter 2006, pp. 128–131.
  120. Sutter 2006, pp. 121–122.
  121. Seo 1984, p. 38.
  122. Minton 1991, p. 32.
  123. "Special Report: Air India Flight 182". airdisaster.com. 2008. Archived from the original on October 7, 2009. Retrieved December 13, 2007.CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  124. "Her Majesty the Queen Against Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri". Supreme Court of British Columbia. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  125. 125.0 125.1 125.2 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 127.
  126. "Air India: Explosive Evidence". Mayday. Season 5. Episode 7. Cineflix. April 9, 2008.
  127. "Virgin Orbit performs LauncherOne aircraft flight tests". SpaceNews.com. August 28, 2018. Retrieved November 22, 2018.
  128. Bergin, Chris. "Cosmic Girl takes LauncherOne on its first captive carry flight test – NASASpaceFlight.com". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved November 22, 2018.
  129. Seo 1984, p. 16.
  130. 130.0 130.1 130.2 Minton 1991, p. 27.
  131. Seo 1984, p. 18.
  132. Minton 1991, p. 31.
  133. Seo 1984, pp. 16–18.
  134. 134.0 134.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 79.
  135. Sutter 2006, pp. 257–259.
  136. Minton 1991, p. 33.
  137. "President's wife christens giant jet". Eugene Register-Guard. Oregon. Associated Press. January 15, 1970. p. 5A.
  138. "Jumbo and the Gremlins". Time, February 2, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.
  139. "About the 747 Family". Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Archived from the original on October 2, 2012.
  140. "Breaking the Ground Barrier". Time, September 8, 1967. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.
  141. "Jumbo Beats the Gremlins". Time, July 13, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.
  142. 142.0 142.1 Shaw 1994, p. 24.
  143. 143.0 143.1 143.2 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 50.
  144. "Ready or Not, Here Comes Jumbo". Time, January 19, 1970. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.
  145. Sutter 2006, pp. 203–204.
  146. 146.0 146.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 51.
  147. Sutter 2006, p. 204.
  148. Shaw 1994, pp. 24–25.
  149. Smith, Bruce A. "Boeing Shuns Very Large Jets While Aiming for Longer Range." Aviation Week and Space Technology, January 1, 2001, pp. 28–29.
  150. 747X vs A380 "How to Reduce Congestion" (PDF). Archived February 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.
  151. "Airline reporting on fuel consumption." Archived December 20, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Miljominsteriet (Danish Environmental Protection Agency). Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  152. "Boeing 747 On Deathwatch: How Boeing's New 777X Will Kill Its Jumbo Jet Predecessor, Once The Queen Of The Skies". International Business Times. May 4, 2013.
  153. Supplementary Estimates, 1971–72 – Vote 41: Transport and Power, 257, Houses of the Oireachtas, November 25, 1971, p. 9, The company took delivery of two Boeing 747s (Jumbos) in March 1971, and they went into service in April and May. The Aerlínte fleet now consists of 6 Boeing 707-320s and 2 Boeing 747s.
  154. "Aer Lingus On Its Own". Flight International. March 25, 1971. A SECOND 747 will be delivered to Aer Lingus-Irish within the next two weeks to join the first which arrived in Dublin on March 6.
  155. "Planes for Rough Weather". Time, August 3, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.
  156. "American Airlines History". American Airlines. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.
  157. Davies 1990, p. 96.
  158. Seo 1984, p. 56.
  159. Shaw 1994, p. 16.
  160. "Final 747 flight now scheduled for Monday". Delta News Hub. Retrieved May 10, 2018.
  161. 161.0 161.1 161.2 Sutter 2006, p. 217.
  162. 162.0 162.1 Shaw 1994, p. 26.
  163. Shaw 1994, pp. 30, 52.
  164. Serling 1992, p. 157.
  165. Shaw 1994, p. 30.
  166. Pealing & Savage 1999, p. 43.
  167. 167.0 167.1 167.2 Cross, Lee (April 7, 2021). "KLM's Dutch Queens of the Skies". Key.Aero. Archived from the original on February 16, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024. (subscription required)
  168. 168.0 168.1 "MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - KLM". taxiways.de. Retrieved May 18, 2026.
  169. "MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - Air New Zealand". taxiways.de. Retrieved May 17, 2026.
  170. 170.0 170.1 Seo 1984, p. 51.
  171. "MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - Alitalia". taxiways.de. Retrieved May 17, 2026.
  172. "MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - Singapore Airlines". taxiways.de. Retrieved May 17, 2026.
  173. "MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - PAKISTAN". taxiways.de. Retrieved May 17, 2026.
  174. "MC DONNELL - DOUGLAS DC - 10 - JAL - JAPAN AIR LINES". taxiways.de. Retrieved May 18, 2026.
  175. Seo 1984, pp. 53.
  176. "PAL marks 25th anniversary on Pacific run today". Metro Manila, Philippines. Manila Standard. June 20, 1987. p. 6.
  177. "PAL acquires 5th 747 to expand services". Metro Manila, Philippines. Manila Standard. November 8, 1987. p. 2.
  178. Seo 1984, pp. 50, 54, 77.
  179. Green, Swanborough & Mowinski 1987, pp. 191–193, 202, 204.
  180. Seo 1984, pp. 46, 50, 66, 69, 80.
  181. Green, Swanborough & Mowinski 1987, pp. 195, 197–198, 203.
  182. Seo 1984, pp. 51–52, 61.
  183. Aboulafia, Richard (March 1, 2004). "Commercial Transport Market Still in Rough Shape". Aviation Week and Space Technology. Archived from the original on January 12, 2012. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
  184. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 100–102.
  185. Seo 1984, pp. 44–45.
  186. 186.0 186.1 186.2 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 102.
  187. Wallace, James (January 24, 2005). "A380 buyer keeps mum about possible luxuries aboard cruise ship of the skies". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved June 3, 2011.
  188. Sutter 2006, p. 262.
  189. "Turning Today's Challenges into Opportunities for Tomorrow". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.
  190. Shaw 1994, p. 58.
  191. 191.0 191.1 Shaw 1994, p. 68.
  192. 192.0 192.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 104.
  193. https://leehamnews.com/2014/06/30/the-struggling-boeing-747-8/
  194. Dastin, Jeffrey (June 4, 2015). "United Airlines does not see a fit for Airbus A380". Reuters. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
  195. Shaw 1994, pp. 68–69.
  196. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 104–105.
  197. Morton 1997, pp. 96–99.
  198. 198.0 198.1 Seo 1984, p. 58.
  199. 199.0 199.1 Minton 1991, pp. 39–40, 43–44.
  200. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 106–107.
  201. 201.0 201.1 Minton 1991, p. 91.
  202. Minton 1991, pp. 39–40.
  203. Minton 1991, p. 92.
  204. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 107.
  205. 205.0 205.1 Cross, Coy F. II (November 1989). MAC and Operation BABYLIFT: Air Transport in Support of Noncombatant Evacuation Operations (PDF). Military Airlift Command. Retrieved May 16, 2026.
  206. "Operation Babylift". Pan Am Museum Foundation. March 16, 2022.
  207. Minton 1991, p. 90-91.
  208. 208.0 208.1 "AIRLIFT: PAN AM AND THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET". Pan Am Historical Foundation. Retrieved May 16, 2026.
  209. 209.0 209.1 209.2 209.3 Minton 1991, p. 44.
  210. 210.0 210.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 106.
  211. Willis, David (January 26, 2023). "Boeing 747 freighters: your complete guide". Key.Aero. (subscription required)
  212. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 108, 110.
  213. Shaw 1994, pp. 14, 72, 76.
  214. Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 113.
  215. 215.0 215.1 215.2 Minton 1991, pp. 41–43.
  216. "About SOFIA: Aircraft: Flying in a Boeing 747SP". NASA SOFIA Science Center. October 5, 2004. Archived from the original on November 13, 2006.
  217. 217.0 217.1 Rosson 2025, pp. 47–48.
  218. 218.0 218.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 112.
  219. Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 103.
  220. 220.0 220.1 Fisher, Alise (December 8, 2022). "NASA's Retired SOFIA Aircraft Finds New Home at Arizona Museum". NASA. Retrieved December 12, 2022.
  221. Minton 1991, pp. 40–41, 78–80, 84.
  222. Minton 1991, pp. 78–79, 84.
  223. 223.0 223.1 223.2 223.3 Leone, Dario (March 7, 2026). "Rare Boeing 747 (operated by IRIAF) cargo aircraft targeted and destroyed at Mehrabad Airport". The Aviation Geek Club.
  224. Serling 1992, p. 372.
  225. 225.0 225.1 Hamilton, S. "Boeing advanced 747 as tanker (PDF)". Leeham Company, September 11, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  226. Minton 1991, p. 84.
  227. Minton 1991, p. 80.
  228. Seo 1984, p. 79.
  229. 229.0 229.1 229.2 Shaw 1994, p. 32.
  230. Minton 1991, p. 95.
  231. Minton 1991, p. 97.
  232. 232.0 232.1 Minton 1991, p. 41.
  233. Minton 1991, p. 40.
  234. "H3 airstrike". MEMIM Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on January 29, 2016. Retrieved January 20, 2016.
  235. Bishop, Farzad; Cooper, Tom (2000). Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988. Atglen: Schiffer Pub. p. 119. ISBN 9780764316692.
  236. Spray, Aaron (March 8, 2026). "The world's last surviving Boeing 747-100 has been destroyed in Iran". Aerospace Global News. Retrieved April 12, 2026.
  237. "Israeli Strikes Destroy World's Last Operational Boeing 747-100 in Tehran". SOFX. March 13, 2026. Retrieved April 12, 2026.
  238. "El Al Israel Airlines' History. The 1990s". El Al Israel Airlines. July 24, 2021. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  239. Angelucci, Angelucci (2001). World Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft. Spain: Chartwell Books. p. 403. ISBN 0-7858-1389-6.
  240. 240.0 240.1 "ICAO Document 8643". International Civil Aviation Organization. Retrieved: April 13, 2013.
  241. Serling 1992, p. 320.
  242. "Boeing 747". Aircraft Spotting. Retrieved: December 7, 2007.
  243. "FAA Regulatory and Guidance Library (PDF)." Archived January 10, 2018, at the Wayback Machine FAA. Retrieved: December 12, 2007. See reference to Supplementary Type Certificates for freighter conversion.
  244. "Still in Love With a 50 Year Old!". CargoForwarder Global. February 3, 2019. Archived from the original on January 21, 2023. Retrieved January 21, 2023.
  245. 245.0 245.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 57.
  246. Sutter 2006, p. 214-215.
  247. 247.0 247.1 247.2 247.3 "747 Model Orders and Deliveries data." Archived September 28, 2018, at the Wayback Machine The Boeing Company, April 2021. Retrieved: October 24, 2020.
  248. "Airliner price index". Flight International. August 10, 1972. p. 183.
  249. Jenkins 2000, p. 40.
  250. Kane 2004, p. 534.
  251. Itabashi et al. 1995, p. 155.
  252. Bowers 1989, pp. 516–517.
  253. 253.0 253.1 Airclaims Jet Programs 1995
  254. "ANA to Retire the Boeing 747SR on March 10" Japan Corporate News Network. Retrieved: December 8, 2015.
  255. "Boeing 747-146B/SR/SUD aircraft" Archived December 15, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, Airliners.net.
  256. "JAL Aircraft Collection". Japan Airlines. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
  257. "747 Model Orders and Deliveries data." Archived September 28, 2018, at the Wayback Machine The Boeing Company, April 2021. Retrieved: October 24, 2020.
  258. Airclaims Jet program 1995
  259. "Saudia Orders 4 Boeing 747's". The New York Times. Reuters. March 31, 1981. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 12, 2007.
  260. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 52–53.
  261. 261.0 261.1 Airclaims Jet Programs 1995, p. 111.
  262. "The world's last 747-100 makes final flight with Iran Air". Arabian Aerospace. January 22, 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2015.
  263. Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 71.
  264. 264.0 264.1 264.2 "The Story of the B747SP". 747sp.com. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
  265. Kane 2003, p. 546.
  266. 266.0 266.1 "747 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
  267. "Red, White And Q Farewell For Qantas Aircraft". Qantas, March 4, 2002. Retrieved: June 4, 2008.
  268. "The SOFIA Boeing 747SP." Archived November 13, 2006, at the Wayback Machine NASA SOFIA Science Center. Retrieved: December 31, 2009.
  269. Iran Aviation Tour October 2015, October 13, 2015
  270. The last B747-SP is going to retire on 15 June, retrieved May 29, 2016
  271. Norris & Wagner 1997, pp. 60–61.
  272. Green, Swanborough & Mowinski 1987, p. 77.
  273. "747 windows". Plexoft. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
  274. Serling 1992, pp. 320–321.
  275. Sutter 2006, p. 208.
  276. 276.0 276.1 Jenkins 2000, p. 43.
  277. Seo 1984, p. 44.
  278. "Boeing 747 – About the 747 Family." Archived June 15, 2006, at the Wayback Machine The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.
  279. Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 60.
  280. "Boeing 747-200." Archived October 26, 2016, at the Wayback Machine CivilAviation.eu. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
  281. 281.0 281.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 61.
  282. Shaw 1994, pp. 48–49.
  283. Sutter 2006, pp. 214–215.
  284. 284.0 284.1 Norris & Wagner 1997, p. 63.
  285. Jenkins 2000, pp. 46, 50–53.
  286. Sutter 2006, p. 208-210.
  287. "747 background." Archived June 15, 2006, at the Wayback Machine The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
  288. "747 Classics Technical Specifications". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.
  289. "Iran Air retires last remaining pax B747-200". ch-aviation.
  290. 290.0 290.1 Thisdell and Seymour Flight International July 30 – August 5, 2019, p. 39.
  291. "Boeing 747-300." Archived August 11, 2004, at the Wayback Machine airliners.net.
  292. "Seven Series". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on March 28, 2010. Retrieved December 15, 2007.
  293. Jenkins 2000, p. 97.
  294. "Boeing 747-100/-200/-300/-SP airport report." (pdf) The Boeing Company, May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.
  295. "Boeing Delivers First 747-300 Special Freighter To Atlas Air". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on October 27, 2000. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  296. "Technical Specifications – 747 Classics", The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 11, 2008
  297. Lawrence and Thornton 2005
  298. "Seven series". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on March 28, 2010. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  299. "Qantas's final Boeing 747-300 heads for graveyard." Archived September 7, 2017, at the Wayback Machine The Age. Retrieved: January 21, 2009.
  300. Drum, Bruce (June 29, 2015). "PIA to retire its last Boeing 747 "within a month"". World Airline News. Archived from the original on August 21, 2016. Retrieved July 17, 2016.
  301. Arshad, Minnah (February 12, 2024). "U.S. seizes Boeing 747 cargo plane that Iranian airline sold to Venezuelan company". USA Today. Retrieved April 13, 2025.
  302. "Assessment of Wingtip Modifications to Increase the Fuel Efficiency of Air Force Aircraft". National Academies Press, 2007, p. 33.
  303. "JAL 2007". Japan Airlines. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
  304. Bland, Alastair. "How Bad Is Air Travel for the Environment?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  305. "Boeing: Commercial Airplanes – 747 Fun Facts". September 12, 2012. Archived from the original on September 12, 2012. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  306. 306.0 306.1 "747 specifications", The Boeing Company. Retrieved December 16, 2007.
  307. "RB211-524 Interchangeability". Hong Kong Aero Engine Services Limited. Archived from the original on March 14, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2018.
  308. "Boeing 747-400 Freighter Family". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  309. "Boeing 747-400/-400ER airport report." (pdf) The Boeing Company, May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.
  310. "Japan Airlines To Receive 100th Boeing 747 Aircraft". Japan Airlines, November 19, 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  311. "Queen of its time". Airliner World. August 20, 2009. Archived from the original on August 22, 2016. Retrieved August 6, 2016.
  312. "Boeing 747-400ER Family". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: October 16, 2007.
  313. "Boeing and Cathay Pacific Airways Launch 747-400 Special Freighter". The Boeing Company, January 7, 2004. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.
  314. "First 747-400 Boeing Converted Freighter Redelivered to Cathay Pacific". The Boeing Company, December 19, 2005. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.
  315. 315.0 315.1 Wallace, James. "747-400 passenger is no more". Seattlepi.com, March 17, 2007. Retrieved June 7, 2011.
  316. 316.0 316.1 "Singapore Airlines Boeing 747-400 Fleet World's Largest". The Boeing Company, October 13, 1994. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
  317. "British Airways set for fleet revamp". The Boeing Company, August 2005. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
  318. "British Airways Boeing 747-400". BritishAirways.com. Retrieved January 21, 2017.
  319. 319.0 319.1 "Final Boeing 747 Dreamlifter Enters Service". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
  320. "Evergreen Aviation press releases". Evergreen Aviation, July 20, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  321. "Boeing 747 Large Cargo Freighter Completes First Flight". The Boeing Company, September 9, 2006.
  322. Mecham, Michael. "Boeing Puts Last Dreamlifter In Service". Aviation Week, February 16, 2010.
  323. "Boeing 747 Dreamlifter Achieves FAA Certification". The Boeing Company, June 4, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  324. Kingsley-Jones, Max (November 13, 2012). "IN FOCUS: Boeing 747-8 technical description & cutaway". Flight Global. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  325. "747-8 Over Mt. Rainier". Boeing. Retrieved January 10, 2024. By working together with customers and applying the innovative new technologies of the 787 Dreamliner, Boeing was able to create the 747-8 family. In fact, the designation 747-8 was chosen to show the technology connection between the 787 and the new 747.
  326. "Boeing 747, the 'Queen of the Skies,' Celebrates 35th Anniversary" Archived October 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine. Boeing, February 9, 2004.
  327. Steinke, Sebastian. "Boeing launches 747-8". Flug Revue, January 2006. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
  328. "Boeing 747-8 Freighter". Deagel. Retrieved: December 8, 2007.
  329. "Boeing 747-8 Freighter Successfully Completes First Flight". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 15, 2011
  330. "Pictures & Video: Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight". Flight International, February 8, 2010. Retrieved: February 9, 2010.
  331. Ostrower, Jon. "747-8F and 787 delivery dates come into focus". Air Transport Intelligence news via Flightglobal.com, August 24, 2011.
  332. Ostrower, Jon. "Boeing delivers first 747-8F". Flightglobal.com, October 12, 2011.
  333. Norris, G. "Boeing freezes the 747-8I design". Aviation Week, 2007. Retrieved: December 8, 2007.
  334. "First 747-8I Takes to the Air" AINOnline, March 20, 2011. Retrieved: March 26, 2011.
  335. Norris, Guy. "Boeing 747-8I Set For Pre-Delivery Evaluation Flights In Germany". Aviation Week, December 6, 2011. Retrieved: March 26, 2011.
  336. Guo, Fangzhong (February 1, 2023). "Boeing Delivers Last Ever 747 to Atlas Air". Airline Geeks. US. Retrieved April 6, 2025.
  337. "Factsheets: VC-25 – Air Force One". Air Force. U.S. Air Force. July 1, 2003. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  338. Taylor 1988, pp. 370–371.
  339. Macias, Amanda; Breuninger, Kevin (February 27, 2018). "The White House cuts $3.9 billion deal with Boeing for two new Air Force Ones". CNBC. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  340. Bowers 1989, p. 528–529.
  341. 341.0 341.1 Donald and Lake 1996, pp. 76–77.
  342. Terdiman, Donald (July 23, 2013). "Aboard America's Doomsday command and control plane". CNET. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  343. "Korean Air sells five jets to US aerospace firm Sierra Nevada". CNA. Mediacorp. May 2024. Archived from the original on May 12, 2024. Retrieved May 11, 2024.
  344. "Sierra Nevada Corporation Will Build E-4B 'Doomsday' Plane Replacement". April 27, 2024.
  345. "Airborne Laser returns for more testing". Air Force. Archived from the original on March 8, 2007. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  346. Gibbs, Yvonne, ed. (August 7, 2017). "NASA Armstrong Fact Sheet: Shuttle Carrier Aircraft". NASA. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  347. Tirpak, John A. (February 1996). "Airlift Moves Up and Out". Air Force Magazine. Retrieved June 30, 2025.
  348. "KC-33A: Closing the Aerial Refuelling and Strategic Air Mobility Gaps (PDF)". Air Power Australia Analysis APA-2005-02, April 16, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  349. "AFMD-82-123 Improper Lobbying Activities by the Department of Defense on the Proposed Procurement of the C-5B Aircraft" (PDF). US: General Accounting Office. September 29, 1982. Retrieved May 31, 2026.
  350. Jenkins 1999.
  351. "Boeing 747 Nuke Launcher – Found And Explained". Found And Explained – Aviation Stories, Facts and Animations!. May 13, 2021. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  352. "MC-747 – Aerospace Projects Review Blog". aerospaceprojectsreview.com. September 11, 2013. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  353. Mizokami, Kyle (August 4, 2016). "That Time a Defense Contractor Wanted to Put ICBMs on 747s". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  354. "Flying Boomers – The Unwanted Blog". up-ship.com. August 19, 2011. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  355. "Investigation of a Micro-Fighter / Airborne Aircraft Carrier Concept" (PDF). Defense Technical Information Center. September 1973. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 13, 2014. Retrieved November 21, 2015.
  356. "Supplementary Type Certificate ST01912LA Installation and removal of internal tanks, associated systems and support structure for the aerial dispersant of liquids" Archived August 22, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. US Federal Aviation Administration, October 27, 2006.
  357. "Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy 308911 SOFIA Quick Facts" (PDF). nasa.gov. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2010. p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 28, 2009. Retrieved December 2, 2010.
  358. "Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA)". The University of Chicago: Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics. Archived from the original on June 10, 2010. Retrieved December 2, 2020.
  359. "Boeing nets 57 new orders, including big VIP planes." Archived February 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine Seattle Times. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
  360. 360.0 360.1 360.2 "747-100/-200/-300/-SP" (PDF). Startup. Boeing. 2007. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  361. 361.0 361.1 361.2 "Boeing 747-100/-200/-300/-SP ACAPS" (PDF). Boeing Airplanes. May 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  362. Jenkins 2000, pp. 69–71.
  363. Sherwell, Chris (January 15, 1986). "Boeing plans propfan engines for bigger jumbos in 1990s" (PDF). Financial Times (29829). Singapore. p. 1.
  364. Donne, Michael (January 20, 1986). "Fly London to Sydney...non-stop" (PDF). Technology. Financial Times (29833). p. 5.
  365. "Boeing offers 747ASB" (PDF). Flight International. June 7, 1986. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved October 6, 2012.
  366. 366.0 366.1 366.2 Patterson, James W. "Impact of New Large Aircraft on Airport Design (PDF)". Federal Aviation Administration, March 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  367. 367.0 367.1 "Boeing 747 Celebrates 30 Years in Service". The Boeing Company (Press release). September 2, 1996. Archived from the original on June 6, 2013. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  368. "Boeing Commits To Produce New Longer-Range 767-400ER". The Boeing Company (Press release). September 13, 2000. Archived from the original on August 12, 2012. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  369. "Customer Symposium Highlights Future Boeing 747 Models". The Boeing Company (Press release). June 29, 2000. Archived from the original on October 11, 2012. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  370. Morris, John (July 24, 2000). "Boeing in No Hurry to Launch 747X". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on August 12, 2011. Retrieved December 18, 2007.
  371. "Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400". The Boeing Company (Press release). Archived from the original on July 6, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
  372. "Boeing Offers New 747-400X Quiet Longer Range Jetliner". The Boeing Company, February 26, 2002. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  373. "GE's CF6 Engine Models Tailored For Boeing's 747-400XQLR Wide-Body." Archived June 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine GE Aviation, March 25, 2002.
  374. Steinke, Sebastian. "Boeing Proposes 747-400X Quiet Longer Range". Flug Revue Online, May 2002. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
  375. Kingsley-Jones, Max. "IN FOCUS: Boeing 747-8 technical description & cutaway". Flight Global, November 13, 2012.
  376. Seo 1984, pp. 41–82.
  377. All Jumbos Australian Transport February 1979 p. 22.
  378. Serling 1992, p. 367.
  379. Sutter 2006, pp. 232–235.
  380. Thisdell and Seymour Flight International July 30 – August 5, 2019, pp. 25, 39–40.
  381. Edward Russell (October 12, 2017). "US 747s fly into the sunset". Flightglobal.
  382. Edward Russell (December 19, 2017). "US 747s bow out with final Delta flight". Flightglobal.
  383. Julie Johnsson (May 16, 2018). "Boeing 747s Are Back From the Dead". Bloomberg.
  384. "British Airways retires entire 747 fleet after travel downturn". BBC News. July 17, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  385. Goodinson, Elena (July 17, 2020). "British Airways retires iconic Boeing 747 fleet – in pictures". The Guardian. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  386. "Final flight for British Airways' last two Heathrow-based Boeing 747 planes". BBC News. October 8, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  387. Brady, Edna (October 8, 2020). "British Airways' last Heathrow-based 747s take off for final flights". Sky News. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  388. "E-4B Fact Sheet". US Air Force. US Air Force. Archived from the original on January 5, 2026. Retrieved February 2, 2026.
  389. "Boeing 747 occurrences". Flight Safety Foundation. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
  390. "Boeing 747 hull-loss occurrences". Flight Safety Foundation. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
  391. "Boeing 747 Statistics". Flight Safety Foundation. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
  392. "ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-121 N656PA Karachi-Quaid-E-Azam International Airport". Aviation-safety.net. August 30, 2017. Retrieved August 30, 2017.
  393. "Air India Flight 182 - Aviation Safety Network".
  394. "Pan Am Flight 103 - Aviation Safety Network".
  395. "Philippine Air Lines Flight 434 - Aviation Safety Network".
  396. McDuffie, Juquai (June 19, 2017). "Why the Military Released GPS to the Public". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on January 28, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
  397. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  398. "Lessons Learned From Transport Airplane Accidents: Fire". Federal Aviation Administration. Archived from the original on February 25, 2013. Retrieved July 25, 2011.
  399. "Airworthiness Directive 93-07-15". Federal Aviation Administration. May 2, 1993. Archived from the original on January 29, 2018. Retrieved July 25, 2011.
  400. "Aircraft Accident Report: In-flight Breakup Over the Atlantic Ocean Trans World Airlines Flight 800" (PDF). NTSB/Aar-00/03. August 23, 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 15, 2013. Retrieved June 24, 2013.
  401. "Airlines Ordered to Cut Fuel-Tank Explosion Risk". Wall Street Journal, July 17, 2008, p. B5. Note: Cargo aircraft and smaller regional jets and commuter aircraft are not subject to this rule.
  402. "ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-258F 4X-AXG Amsterdam". Aviation-safety.net. Retrieved December 9, 2013.
  403. "Case Study: Lufthansa - Flight 540 - Boeing 747-130, November 20, 1974" (PDF). Blue Skies: GainJet Aviation Safety Magazine. GainJet Aviation (3). January 13, 2022. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 17, 2018. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  404. "The First B-747 Goes Down Just After Takeoff". avstop.com. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  405. "Lufthansa Flight 540". Aviation Safety Network.
  406. "Air India Flight 855". Aviation Safety Network.
  407. "Pan Am Flight 845 - Aviation Safety Network".
  408. "British Airways Flight 9 - Aviation Service Network".
  409. "Philippine Airlines Flight 434 - Airline Safety Network".
  410. "Boeing 747-121". Museum of Flight. US. Retrieved July 15, 2011.
  411. "GE Aviation Donates 747-100 Testbed to Museum". Australian Aviation. Australia. November 19, 2018. Retrieved June 23, 2025.
  412. "Historic Aircraft Lands at Air and Space Museum". WTOP News. January 16, 2007. Archived from the original on June 20, 2007.
  413. "Artifact Pick of the Week – Boeing 747". Evergreen Air & Space Museum. June 25, 2013. Archived from the original on May 17, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  414. "FAA Registry: Aircraft Inquiry: N-481EV". FAA. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  415. "N905NA (1970 Boeing 747-123 owned by National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Aircraft Registration". FlightAware.
  416. "Shuttle replica lifted and put on top of 747 carrier". space-travel.com.
  417. "Boeing 747-100 Nose Section and Cockpit". Hiller Aviation Museum. Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  418. ""Lebombo": Boeing 747-244B". SAA Museum Society. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  419. "Boeing 747-128 F-BPVJ". Musée Air + Espace (in French). Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  420. "제주도 하이킹 여행기 9 : 정석항공관, 산굼부리" [Jeju Island Hiking Travelogue 9: Jeongseok Aviation Museum, Sangumburi]. The Blue Sky (in Korean). Korea. June 23, 2003. Article #44. Archived from the original on July 22, 2011.
  421. "This is indeed a full-sized Boeing 747 passenger plane atop the Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum in McMinnville, Oregon". Library of Congress. US. May 19, 2018. Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  422. "N911NA (1973 747-SR-46 owned by National Aeronautics And Space Administration) Aircraft Registration". FlightAware. Retrieved September 18, 2025.
  423. "Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 911's Final Journey - NASA". Retrieved September 18, 2025.
  424. Kokkinidis, Tasos (February 23, 2024). "Aristotle Onassis' Historic Olympic Airways Plane Displayed in Athens". Greek Reporter. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  425. ""Maluti": Boeing 747SP-44". SAA Museum Society. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  426. "Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet". Luchvaart Museum Aviodrome (in Dutch). Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  427. "The Museum". Qantas Founders Museum. Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  428. Kobayashi, Shinobu (April 15, 2012). "Preserving a Boeing 747 nose". Japan Aeronautical Association (in Japanese). Retrieved November 25, 2024.
  429. "航空科学博物館でB747-200型の一般公開がはじまる" [The B747-200 will be on public display at the Aviation Science Museum]. FlyTeam(フライチーム) (in Japanese). August 4, 2011. Retrieved November 25, 2024.
  430. Minton 1991, p. 101.
  431. Tang, XuFeng (August 15, 2023). "咋回事?一架波音747停在了舟山的一处山顶上!" [What's going on? A Boeing 747 has landed on a mountaintop in Zhoushan!] (in Chinese). China: Tide News.
  432. Chakravarty, Sayan (December 6, 2025). "Someone forgot not one or two but three Boeing 747 jumbo jets at Kuala Lumpur Airport, and after years of racking millions in parking bills the gigantic planes were sold and spectacularly transformed into a surreal Chinese classroom and a Coach handbag store". Luxurylaunches.
  433. "Un B747 para el Museo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología". microsiervos (in Spanish). April 7, 2009. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
  434. Kruse, Brian (May 2, 2016). "Retired 747-400 takes road trip home to Flight Museum". Delta News Hub. Delta Air Lines, Inc. Retrieved November 29, 2016.
  435. "Boeing 747-438 "VH-OJA, City of Canberra"". HARS Aviation Museum. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  436. "Negus and Cotswold Airport". Events at Cotswold Airport. Retrieved July 23, 2025.
  437. "Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 18, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
  438. "Dark Roasted Blend: Abandoned Boeing 747 Restaurant (and Other Plane Conversions)." Archived July 12, 2017, at the Wayback Machine darkroastedblend.com, April 21, 2009. Retrieved: April 22, 2009.
  439. "Historic 747 reaches grim end in South Korea". Chicago Tribune, December 13, 2010. Retrieved: December 13, 2010.
  440. Wastnage, Justin. "James Bond Casino Royale modified Boeing 747-XXX on show ahead of movie première." Flight International, August 29, 2006. Retrieved: January 2, 2012.
  441. "747 is 'Airbourne'". Dunsfold Park, March 2011. Retrieved January 2, 2012.
  442. "Swedish Hotel Fashioned From An Old Jumbo Jet" Tayfun King, Fast Track, BBC World News (November 23, 2008)
  443. Finighan, Adrian. "Jumbo Jet Hostel" CNN Money (February 11, 2009)
  444. Noëth, Bart (March 22, 2025). "Iconic Jumbo Stay 747 hotel at Stockholm Arlanda declares bankruptcy, may be sold for scrap". Aviation24. Belgium. Retrieved April 5, 2025.
  445. "Old PIA plane takes new flight as airport security turns it into restaurant: reports". Dawn.com. May 31, 2017. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
  446. "ASF says its PIA jumbo jet 'restaurant' actually an officers' mess". The Express Tribune. June 3, 2017. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
  447. Amelar, Sarah. "The 747 Wing House". Architectural Record, April 2012. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
  448. Tuzee, Michelle. "Malibu 'Wing House' made of 747 plane parts". KABC-TV, May 17, 2011. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
  449. Istook, Marc. "The wing house – a house made out of an old Boeing 747" Yahoo! News, March 3, 2012. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
  450. Derringer, Jaime. "The 747 wing house". Design Milk, September 7, 2011. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
  451. "Pesawat SMB". Steak 21. Indonesia. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
  452. "First and largest private jet restaurant in Indonesia". Antara Foto. Indonesia. January 31, 2024. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
  453. Burns, Ashley (June 1, 2017). "Paul Allen's Stratolaunch Emerges from Hangar for Fueling Tests". Flying Magazine. US. Retrieved July 2, 2025.
  454. Haenggi 2003, p. 9.
  455. Sutter 2006, p. 279.
  456. 456.0 456.1 Davies, David P. (1971). Handling the Big Jets: An Explanation of the Significant Differences in Flying Qualities Between Jet Transport Aeroplanes and Piston Engined Transport Aeroplanes, Together with Some Other Aspects of Jet Transport Handling (3rd ed.). Air Registration Board. ISBN 0903083019.
  457. "Category:Boeing 747". impdb.org. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
  458. "The most iconic aircraft in film history". chapman-freeborn.com. August 6, 2013. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
  459. "Executive Decision". Movie Ramblings. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  460. "Air Force One". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
  461. Spaeth, Andreas (October 16, 2025). "Boeing 747: Queen of the Skies".
  462. Dowling, Stephen (June 19, 2020). "The Boeing 747: The plane that shrank the world". BBC. UK. Retrieved May 1, 2026.

Bibliography

  • Bowers, Peter M. (1989). Boeing Aircraft Since 1916. London: Putnam Aeronautical Books. ISBN 0-85177-804-6.
  • Davies, R.E.G. Delta: An Airline and Its Aircraft: The Illustrated History of a Major U.S. Airline and the People Who Made It. McLean, VA: Paladwr Press, 1990. ISBN 0-9626483-0-2.
  • Donald, David and Lake, Jon. Encyclopedia of World Military Aircraft. London: Aerospace Publishing, 1996. ISBN 1-874023-95-6.
  • Green, William; Swanborough, Gordon; Mowinski, John (1987). Modern Commercial Aircraft. London: Salamander Books Ltd. ISBN 0-86101-271-2.
  • Haenggi, Michael. Boeing Widebodies. St. Paul, MN: MBI Publishing Co., 2003. ISBN 0-7603-0842-X.
  • Irving, Clive (1994). Wide Body: The Making of the Boeing 747. Philadelphia: Coronet. ISBN 0-340-59983-9.
  • Itabashi, M., K. Kawata and S. Kusaka. "Pre-fatigued 2219-T87 and 6061-T6 aluminium alloys". Structural Failure: Technical, Legal and Insurance Aspects. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon.: Taylor & Francis, 1995. ISBN 978-0-419-20710-8.
  • Jenkins, Dennis R. (1999). B-1 Lancer, The Most Complicated Warplane Ever Developed. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-134694-5.
  • Jenkins, Dennis R. (2000). Boeing 747-100/200/300/SP. AirlinerTech Series. 6. North Branch, Minnesota: Specialty Press. ISBN 1-58007-026-4.
  • Kane, Robert M. Air Transportation: 1903–2003. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Co., 2004. ISBN 0-7575-3180-6.
  • Lawrence, Philip K. and David Weldon Thornton. Deep Stall: The Turbulent Story of Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2005, ISBN 0-7546-4626-2.
  • Minton, David H. (1991). The Boeing 747 (Aero Series 40). Fallbrook, CA: Aero Publishers. ISBN 0-8306-3574-2.
  • Morton, John K. (1997). Jetliner Glory: Airliner Liveries. Osceola, Wisconsin: Motorbooks International. ISBN 0-7603-0515-3.
  • Norris, Guy; Wagner, Mark (1997). Boeing 747: Design and Development Since 1969. St. Paul, Minnesota: MBI Publishing Co. ISBN 0-7603-0280-4.
  • Norton, Bill. Lockheed Martin C-5 Galaxy. North Branch, MN: Specialty Press, 2003. ISBN 1-58007-061-2.
  • Orlebar, Christopher. The Concorde Story. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 5th ed., 2002. ISBN 1-85532-667-1.
  • Pealing, Norman; Savage, Mike (1999). Jumbo Jetliners: Boeing's 747 and the Widebodies. Osprey Color Classics. Osceola, Wisconsin: Motorbooks International. ISBN 1-85532-874-7.
  • Rosson, Lois R. (2025). SOFIA: The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (PDF). Washington, DC: NASA. ISBN 978-1-62683-085-1.
  • Seo, Hiroshi (1984). Boeing 747. Worthing, West Sussex: Littlehampton Book Services Ltd. ISBN 0-7106-0304-5.
  • Serling, Robert J. (1992). Legend & Legacy: The Story of Boeing and Its People. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 031205890X.
  • Shaw, Robbie (1994). Boeing 747 (Osprey Civil Aircraft series). London: Osprey. ISBN 1-85532-420-2.
  • Sutter, Joe (2006). 747: Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation. Washington, District of Columbia: Smithsonian Books. ISBN 978-0-06-088241-9.
  • Taylor, John W. R. (editor). Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1988–89. Coulsdon, UK: Jane's Defence Data, 1988. ISBN 0-7106-0867-5.
  • Thisdell, Dan and Seymour, Chris. "World Airliner Census". Flight International, July 30 – August 5, 2019, Vol. 196, No. 5697. pp. 24–47. ISSN 0015-3710.

Further reading

  • Ingells, Douglas J. (1970). 747: Story of the Boeing Super Jet. Fallbrook, California: Aero Publishers. ISBN 0-8168-8704-7.
  • Kuter, Laurence S. (1973). The Great Gamble: The Boeing 747. The Boeing – Pan Am Project to Develop, Produce, and Introduce the 747. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. ISBN 0-8173-8700-5.
  • Lucas, Jim (1988). Boeing 747 – The First 20 Years. Browcom Publishers Ltd. ISBN 0-946141-37-1.
  • Wright, Alan J. (1989). Boeing 747. Hersham, Surrey: Ian Allan. ISBN 0-7110-1814-6.
  • Smith, P.R. Boeing 747. Airline Markings. 1. Shrewsbury: Airlife.
  • Baum, Brian (1997). Boeing 747-SP. Great Airliners. 3. Osceola, Wisconsin: Motorbooks International. ISBN 0-9626730-7-2.
  • Falconer, Jonathan (1997). Boeing 747 in Color. Hersham, Surrey: Ian Allan. ISBN 1-882663-14-4.
  • Gilchrist, Peter (1998). Boeing 747-400. Airliner Color History. Osceola, Wisconson: Motorbooks International. ISBN 0-7603-0616-8.
  • Henderson, Scott (1999). Boeing 747-100/200 In Camera. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Scoval Publishing. ISBN 1-902236-01-7.
  • Shaw, Robbie (1999). Boeing 747-400: The Mega-Top. Osprey Civil Aircraft. London: Osprey. ISBN 1-85532-893-3.
  • Wilson, Stewart (1999). Boeing 747. Aviation Notebook. Queanbeyan, NSW: Wilson Media Pty. Ltd. ISBN 1-876722-01-0.
  • Wilson, Stewart (1999). Airliners of the World. Fyshwick, Australia: Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd. ISBN 1-875671-44-7.
  • Birtles, Philip (2000). Boeing 747-400. Hersham, Surrey: Ian Allan. ISBN 0-7110-2728-5.
  • Bowman, Martin (2000). Boeing 747. Crowood Aviation. Marlborough, Wilts: Crowood. ISBN 1-86126-242-6.
  • Dorr, Robert F. (2000). Boeing 747-400. AirlinerTech. 10. North Branch, Minnesota: Specialty Press. ISBN 1-58007-055-8.
  • Gesar, Aram (2000). Boeing 747: The Jumbo. New York: Pyramid Media Group. ISBN 0-944188-02-8.
  • Gilchrist, Peter. Boeing 747 Classic (Airliner Color History). Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International, 2000. ISBN 0-7603-1007-6.
  • Graham, Ian. In Control: How to Fly a 747. Somerville, MA: Candlewick, 2000. ISBN 0-7636-1278-2.
  • Nicholls, Mark. The Airliner World Book of the Boeing 747. New York: Osprey Publishing, 2002. ISBN 0-946219-61-3.
  • March, Peter. The Boeing 747 Story. Stroud, Glos.: The History Press, 2009. ISBN 0-7509-4485-4.
  • Eames, Jim (2022). [[[:Template:GBurl]] The Mighty 747: Australia's Queen of the Skies] Check |url= value (help). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 9781760877118.
  • Spaeth, Andreas; Thomas, Geoffrey (2022). Boeing 747: Memories of the Jumbo Jet / Boeing 747: Erinnerungen an den Jumbojet (in English and German). Berlin: Delius Fine Books. ISBN 9783949827006.

Template:Boeing 747 family Template:Boeing airliners Template:Boeing model numbers Template:Boeing 7x7 timeline Template:US transport aircraft