Bernoulli number: Difference between revisions
imported>David Eppstein the missing reference |
imported>1234qwer1234qwer4 m link (via WP:JWB) |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
|} | |} | ||
In [[mathematics]], the '''Bernoulli numbers''' {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}} are a [[sequence]] of [[rational number]]s which occur frequently in [[Mathematical analysis|analysis]]. The Bernoulli numbers appear in (and can be defined by) the [[Taylor series]] expansions of the [[tangent function|tangent]] and [[Hyperbolic function|hyperbolic tangent]] functions, in [[Faulhaber's formula]] for the sum of ''m''-th powers of the first ''n'' positive | In [[mathematics]], the '''Bernoulli numbers''' {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}} are a [[sequence]] of [[rational number]]s which occur frequently in [[Mathematical analysis|analysis]]. The Bernoulli numbers appear in (and can be defined by) the [[Taylor series]] expansions of the [[tangent function|tangent]] and [[Hyperbolic function|hyperbolic tangent]] functions, in [[Faulhaber's formula]] for the sum of ''m''-th powers of the first ''n'' [[positive integer]]s, in the [[Euler–Maclaurin formula]], and in expressions for certain values of the [[Riemann zeta function]]. | ||
The values of the first 20 Bernoulli numbers are given in the adjacent table. Two conventions are used in the literature, denoted here by <math>B^{-{}}_n</math> and <math>B^{+{}}_n</math>; they differ only for {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, where <math>B^{-{}}_1=-1/2</math> and <math>B^{+{}}_1=+1/2</math>. For every odd {{math|''n'' > 1}}, {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub> {{=}} 0}}. For every even {{math|''n'' > 0}}, {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}} is negative if {{math|''n''}} is divisible by 4 and positive otherwise. The Bernoulli numbers are special values of the [[Bernoulli polynomials]] <math>B_n(x)</math>, with <math>B^{-{}}_n=B_n(0)</math> and <math>B^+_n=B_n(1)</math>.{{r|Weisstein2016}} | The values of the first 20 Bernoulli numbers are given in the adjacent table. Two conventions are used in the literature, denoted here by <math>B^{-{}}_n</math> and <math>B^{+{}}_n</math>; they differ only for {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, where <math>B^{-{}}_1=-1/2</math> and <math>B^{+{}}_1=+1/2</math>. For every odd {{math|''n'' > 1}}, {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub> {{=}} 0}}. For every even {{math|''n'' > 0}}, {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}} is negative if {{math|''n''}} is divisible by 4 and positive otherwise. The Bernoulli numbers are special values of the [[Bernoulli polynomials]] <math>B_n(x)</math>, with <math>B^{-{}}_n=B_n(0)</math> and <math>B^+_n=B_n(1)</math>.{{r|Weisstein2016}} | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
==Notation== | ==Notation== | ||
The superscript {{math|±}} used in this article distinguishes the two sign conventions for Bernoulli numbers. Only the {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}} term is affected: | The superscript {{math|±}} used in this article distinguishes the two sign conventions for Bernoulli numbers. Only the {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}} term is affected: | ||
* {{math|''B''{{su|p=−|b=''n''}} }} with {{math|''B''{{su|p=−|b=1}} {{=}} −{{sfrac|1|2}} }} ({{OEIS2C|id=A027641}} / {{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}) is the sign convention prescribed by [[NIST]] and | * {{math|''B''{{su|p=−|b=''n''}} }} with {{math|''B''{{su|p=−|b=1}} {{=}} −{{sfrac|1|2}} }} ({{OEIS2C|id=A027641}} / {{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}) is the sign convention prescribed by [[NIST]] and many modern textbooks.{{sfnp|Arfken|1970|p=278}} | ||
* {{math|''B''{{su|p=+|b=''n''}}}} with {{math|''B''{{su|p=+|b=1}} {{=}} +{{sfrac|1|2}} }} ({{OEIS2C|id=A164555}} / {{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}) was used in the older literature,{{r|Weisstein2016}} and (since 2022) by [[Donald Knuth]]<ref>[[Donald Knuth]] (2022), [https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/news22.html Recent News (2022): Concrete Mathematics and Bernoulli]. {{blockquote|But last year I took a close look at Peter Luschny's Bernoulli manifesto, where he gives more than a dozen good reasons why the value of $B_1$ should really be plus one-half. He explains that some mathematicians of the early 20th century had unilaterally changed the conventions, because some of their formulas came out a bit nicer when the negative value was used. It was their well-intentioned but ultimately poor choice that had led to what I'd been taught in the 1950s. […] By now, hundreds of books that use the “minus-one-half” convention have unfortunately been written. Even worse, all the major software systems for symbolic mathematics have that 20th-century aberration deeply embedded. Yet Luschny convinced me that we have all been wrong, and that it's high time to change back to the correct definition before the situation gets even worse. | * {{math|''B''{{su|p=+|b=''n''}}}} with {{math|''B''{{su|p=+|b=1}} {{=}} +{{sfrac|1|2}} }} ({{OEIS2C|id=A164555}} / {{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}) was used in the older literature,{{r|Weisstein2016}} and (since 2022) by [[Donald Knuth]]<ref>[[Donald Knuth]] (2022), [https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/news22.html Recent News (2022): Concrete Mathematics and Bernoulli]. {{blockquote|But last year I took a close look at Peter Luschny's Bernoulli manifesto, where he gives more than a dozen good reasons why the value of $B_1$ should really be plus one-half. He explains that some mathematicians of the early 20th century had unilaterally changed the conventions, because some of their formulas came out a bit nicer when the negative value was used. It was their well-intentioned but ultimately poor choice that had led to what I'd been taught in the 1950s. […] By now, hundreds of books that use the “minus-one-half” convention have unfortunately been written. Even worse, all the major software systems for symbolic mathematics have that 20th-century aberration deeply embedded. Yet Luschny convinced me that we have all been wrong, and that it's high time to change back to the correct definition before the situation gets even worse. | ||
}}</ref> following Peter Luschny's "Bernoulli Manifesto".<ref>Peter Luschny (2013), [http://luschny.de/math/zeta/The-Bernoulli-Manifesto.html The Bernoulli Manifesto]</ref> | }}</ref> following Peter Luschny's "Bernoulli Manifesto".<ref>Peter Luschny (2013), [http://luschny.de/math/zeta/The-Bernoulli-Manifesto.html The Bernoulli Manifesto]</ref> | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
Bernoulli's formula for sums of powers is the most useful and generalizable formulation to date. The coefficients in Bernoulli's formula are now called Bernoulli numbers, following a suggestion of [[Abraham de Moivre]]. | Bernoulli's formula for sums of powers is the most useful and generalizable formulation to date. The coefficients in Bernoulli's formula are now called Bernoulli numbers, following a suggestion of [[Abraham de Moivre]]. | ||
Bernoulli's formula is sometimes called [[Faulhaber's formula]] after Johann Faulhaber who found remarkable ways to calculate sum of powers but never stated Bernoulli's formula. According to Knuth{{sfnp|Knuth|1993}} a rigorous proof of Faulhaber's formula was first published by [[Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi|Carl Jacobi]] in 1834.{{r|Jacobi1834}} Knuth's in-depth study of Faulhaber's formula concludes | Bernoulli's formula is sometimes called [[Faulhaber's formula]] after Johann Faulhaber who found remarkable ways to calculate sum of powers but never stated Bernoulli's formula. According to Knuth{{sfnp|Knuth|1993}} a rigorous proof of Faulhaber's formula was first published by [[Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi|Carl Jacobi]] in 1834.{{r|Jacobi1834}} Knuth's in-depth study of Faulhaber's formula concludes: | ||
:''"Faulhaber never discovered the Bernoulli numbers; i.e., he never realized that a single sequence of constants'' {{math|''B''<sub>0</sub>, ''B''<sub>1</sub>, ''B''<sub>2</sub>,}} ''... would provide a uniform'' | :''"Faulhaber never discovered the Bernoulli numbers; i.e., he never realized that a single sequence of constants'' {{math|''B''<sub>0</sub>, ''B''<sub>1</sub>, ''B''<sub>2</sub>,}} ''... would provide a uniform'' | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
:<math display=inline> \sum n^m = \frac 1{m+1}\left( B_0n^{m+1}+\binom{m+1} 1 B^+_1 n^m+\binom{m+1} 2B_2n^{m-1}+\cdots+\binom{m+1}mB_mn\right). </math> | :<math display=inline> \sum n^m = \frac 1{m+1}\left( B_0n^{m+1}+\binom{m+1} 1 B^+_1 n^m+\binom{m+1} 2B_2n^{m-1}+\cdots+\binom{m+1}mB_mn\right). </math> | ||
=== Reconstruction of " | === Reconstruction of "Summæ Potestatum" === | ||
{{floated box| <small>... Atque sic porrò ad altiores gradatim potestates pergere, levique negotio sequentem adornare laterculum licet:<br/><br/>''Summæ Potestatum''<br/><math>\textstyle \int n=\frac{1}{2}nn+\frac{1}{2}n</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int nn=\frac{1}{3}n^{3}+\frac{1}{2}nn+\frac{1}{6}n</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{3}=\frac{1}{4}n^{4}+\frac{1}{2}n^{3}+\frac{1}{4}nn</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{4}=\frac{1}{5}n^{5}+\frac{1}{2}n^{4}+\frac{1}{3}n^{3}-\frac{1}{30}n</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{5}=\frac{1}{6}n^{6}+\frac{1}{2}n^{5}+\frac{5}{12}n^{4}-\frac{1}{12}nn</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{6}=\frac{1}{7}n^{7}+\frac{1}{2}n^{6}+\frac{1}{2}n^{5}-\frac{1}{6}n^{3}+\frac{1}{42}n</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{7}=\frac{1}{8}n^{8}+\frac{1}{2}n^{7}+\frac{7}{12}n^{6}-\frac{7}{24}n^{4}+\frac{1}{12}nn</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{8}=\frac{1}{9}n^{9}+\frac{1}{2}n^{8}+\frac{2}{3}n^{7}-\frac{7}{15}n^{5}+\frac{2}{9}n^{3}-\frac{1}{30}n</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{9}=\frac{1}{10}n^{10}+\frac{1}{2}n^{9}+\frac{3}{4}n^{8}-\frac{7}{10}n^{6}+\frac{1}{2}n^{4}-\frac{1}{12}nn</math><br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{10}=\frac{1}{11}n^{11}+\frac{1}{2}n^{10}+\frac{5}{6}n^{9}-1n^{7}+1n^{5}-\frac{1}{2}n^{3}+\frac{5}{66}n</math><br/>Quin imò qui legem progressionis inibi attentius inspexerit, eundem etiam continuare poterit absque his ratiociniorum ambagibus: Sumtâ enim <math>c</math> pro potestatis cujuslibet exponente, fit summa omnium <math>n^{c}</math> seu<br/><math>\textstyle \int n^{c}= \frac{1}{c+1}n^{c+1}+\frac{1}{2}n^{c}+\frac{c}{2}An^{c-1}+\frac{c\cdot c-1\cdot c-2}{2\cdot3\cdot4}Bn^{c-3}</math><br/><math> \qquad +\frac{c\cdot c-1\cdot c-2\cdot c-3\cdot c-4}{2\cdot3\cdot4\cdot5\cdot6}Cn^{c-5}</math><br/><math>\qquad +\frac{c\cdot c-1\cdot c-2\cdot c-3\cdot c-4\cdot c-5\cdot c-6}{2\cdot3\cdot4\cdot5\cdot6\cdot7\cdot8}Dn^{c-7}\ldots</math><br/>& ita deinceps, exponentem potestatis ipsius <math>n</math> continuè minuendo binario, quosque perveniatur ad <math>n</math> vel <math>nn</math>. Literæ capitales <math>A</math>, <math>B</math>, <math>C</math>, <math>D</math> &c. ordine denotant coëfficientes ultimorum terminorum pro <math>\textstyle \int nn</math>, <math>\textstyle \int n^{4}</math>, <math>\textstyle \int n^{6}</math>, <math>\textstyle \int n^{8}</math> &c. nempe<br/><math>\textstyle A=\frac{1}{6},B=-\frac{1}{30},C=\frac{1}{42},D=-\frac{1}{30}.</math> <br/><br/> From '''Jacob Bernoulli's [[Ars Conjectandi]], 1713'''</small>{{efn|Translation of the text:<ref name="Smith1929">{{cite book | |||
" ... | |last=Smith | ||
Sums of powers<br> | |first=David Eugene | ||
<math>\textstyle \int n = \sum_{k=1}^n k = \frac {1}{2} n^2 + \frac {1}{2} n </math><br> | |year = 1929 | ||
|chapter=Jacques (I) Bernoulli: On the 'Bernoulli Numbers' | |||
<math>\textstyle \int n^{10} = \sum_{k=1}^n k^{10} = \frac {1}{11} n^{11} + \frac {1}{2} n^{10} + \frac {5}{6} n^9 - 1 n^7 + 1 n^5 - \frac {1}{2} n^3 + \frac {5}{66} n </math><br> | |title= A Source Book in Mathematics | ||
Indeed [if] one will have examined diligently the law of arithmetic progression there, one will also be able to continue the same without these circuitous computations: For [if] <math>\textstyle c </math> is taken as the exponent of any power, the sum of all <math>\textstyle n^c </math> is produced or<br> | |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/sourcebookinmath00smit/page/85 | ||
<math>\textstyle \int n^c = \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \frac {1}{c+1} n^{c+1} + \frac {1}{2} n^c + \frac {c}{2} An^{c-1} + \frac {c(c-1)(c-2)}{2\cdot 3\cdot4} Bn^{c-3} + \frac {c(c-1)(c-2)(c-3)(c-4)}{2\cdot 3\cdot 4 \cdot 5 \cdot 6} Cn^{c-5} + \frac {c(c-1)(c-2)(c-3)(c-4)(c-5)(c-6)}{2\cdot 3\cdot 4 \cdot 5 \cdot 6 \cdot 7 \cdot 8} Dn^{c-7} + \cdots </math><br> | |location=New York | ||
and so forth, the exponent of its power <math>n</math> continually diminishing by 2 until it arrives at <math>n</math> or <math>n^2</math>. The capital letters <math>\textstyle A, B, C, D, </math> etc. denote in order the coefficients of the last terms for <math>\textstyle \int n^2 , \int n^4 , \int n^6 , \int n^8 </math>, etc. namely<br> | |publisher=McGraw-Hill | ||
<math>\textstyle A = \frac {1}{6} , B = - \frac {1}{30} , C = \frac {1}{42} , D = - \frac {1}{30} </math>. | |pages=85–90 | ||
}}</ref><br/> " ... Thus we can step by step reach higher and higher powers and with slight effort form the following table:<br/><br/> ''Sums of powers''<br/> <math>\textstyle \int n = \sum_{k=1}^n k = \frac {1}{2} n^2 + \frac {1}{2} n </math><br/> ⋮<br/> <math>\textstyle \int n^{10} = \sum_{k=1}^n k^{10} = \frac {1}{11} n^{11} + \frac {1}{2} n^{10} + \frac {5}{6} n^9 - 1 n^7 + 1 n^5 - \frac {1}{2} n^3 + \frac {5}{66} n </math><br/> Indeed [if] one will have examined diligently the law of arithmetic progression there, one will also be able to continue the same without these circuitous computations: For [if] <math>\textstyle c </math> is taken as the exponent of any power, the sum of all <math>\textstyle n^c </math> is produced or<br/> <math>\textstyle \int n^c = \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \frac {1}{c+1} n^{c+1} + \frac {1}{2} n^c + \frac {c}{2} An^{c-1} + \frac {c(c-1)(c-2)}{2\cdot 3\cdot4} Bn^{c-3} + \frac {c(c-1)(c-2)(c-3)(c-4)}{2\cdot 3\cdot 4 \cdot 5 \cdot 6} Cn^{c-5} + \frac {c(c-1)(c-2)(c-3)(c-4)(c-5)(c-6)}{2\cdot 3\cdot 4 \cdot 5 \cdot 6 \cdot 7 \cdot 8} Dn^{c-7} + \cdots </math><br/> and so forth, the exponent of its power <math>n</math> continually diminishing by 2 until it arrives at <math>n</math> or <math>n^2</math>. The capital letters <math>\textstyle A, B, C, D, </math> etc. denote in order the coefficients of the last terms for <math>\textstyle \int n^2 , \int n^4 , \int n^6 , \int n^8 </math>, etc. namely<br/> <math>\textstyle A = \frac {1}{6} , B = - \frac {1}{30} , C = \frac {1}{42} , D = - \frac {1}{30} </math>.}}<ref name="Bernoulli1713"/> |width=27em}} | |||
}} | |||
The Bernoulli numbers {{OEIS2C|id=A164555}}(n)/{{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}(n) were introduced by Jacob Bernoulli in the book ''[[Ars Conjectandi]]'' published posthumously in 1713 page 97. The main formula can be seen in the second half of the corresponding facsimile. The constant coefficients denoted {{math|''A''}}, {{math|''B''}}, {{math|''C''}} and {{math|''D''}} by Bernoulli are mapped to the notation which is now prevalent as {{math|''A'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>2</sub>}}, {{math|''B'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>4</sub>}}, {{math|''C'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>6</sub>}}, {{math|''D'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>8</sub>}}. The expression {{math|''c''·''c''−1·''c''−2·''c''−3}} means {{math|''c''·(''c''−1)·(''c''−2)·(''c''−3)}} – the small dots are used as grouping symbols. Using today's terminology these expressions are [[Pochhammer symbol|falling factorial powers]] {{math|''c''<sup>{{underline|''k''}}</sup>}}. The factorial notation {{math|''k''!}} as a shortcut for {{math|1 × 2 × ... × ''k''}} was | The Bernoulli numbers {{OEIS2C|id=A164555}}(n)/{{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}(n) were introduced by Jacob Bernoulli in the book ''[[Ars Conjectandi]]'' published posthumously in 1713.<ref name="Bernoulli1713">{{cite book | ||
|last=Bernoulli | |||
|first=Jacob | |||
|year =1713 | |||
|title=Ars Conjectandi | |||
|url= https://archive.org/details/jacobibernoulli00bern/page/97/mode/1up | |||
|location=Basel | |||
|publisher=Impensis Thurnisiorum, Fratrum | |||
|pages=97–98 | |||
|language=la | |||
|doi=10.5479/sil.262971.39088000323931 | |||
}}</ref> The main formula can be seen in the second half of the corresponding [https://archive.org/details/jacobibernoulli00bern/page/97/mode/1up facsimile]. The constant coefficients denoted {{math|''A''}}, {{math|''B''}}, {{math|''C''}} and {{math|''D''}} by Bernoulli are mapped to the notation which is now prevalent as {{math|''A'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>2</sub>}}, {{math|''B'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>4</sub>}}, {{math|''C'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>6</sub>}}, {{math|''D'' {{=}} ''B''<sub>8</sub>}}. The expression {{math|''c''·''c''−1·''c''−2·''c''−3}} means {{math|''c''·(''c''−1)·(''c''−2)·(''c''−3)}} – the small dots are used as grouping symbols. Using today's terminology these expressions are [[Pochhammer symbol|falling factorial powers]] {{math|''c''<sup>{{underline|''k''}}</sup>}}. The factorial notation {{math|''k''!}} as a shortcut for {{math|1 × 2 × ... × ''k''}} was introduced much later in 1808 by [[Christian Kramp]]. The integral symbol ∫ on the left hand side goes back to [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]] in 1675 who used it as a long letter {{math|''S''}} for "summa" (sum).<ref name="Miller-2017">{{citation |title=Earliest Uses of Symbols of Calculus |last=Miller |first=Jeff |date=23 June 2017 |access-date= 2026-01-03 |url= https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Miller/mathsym/calculus/}}</ref> The letter {{math|''n''}} on the left hand side is not an index of [[summation]] but gives the upper limit of the range of summation which is to be understood as {{math|1, 2, ..., ''n''}}. Putting things together, for positive {{math|''c''}}, today a mathematician is likely to write Bernoulli's formula as: | |||
: <math> \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \frac{n^{c+1}}{c+1}+\frac 1 2 n^c+\sum_{k=2}^c \frac{B_k}{k!} c^{\underline{k-1}}n^{c-k+1}.</math> | : <math> \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \frac{n^{c+1}}{c+1}+\frac 1 2 n^c+\sum_{k=2}^c \frac{B_k}{k!} c^{\underline{k-1}}n^{c-k+1}.</math> | ||
This formula suggests setting {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} {{sfrac|1|2}}}} when switching from the so-called 'archaic' enumeration which uses only the even indices 2, 4, 6... to the modern form | This formula suggests setting {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} {{sfrac|1|2}}}} when switching from the so-called 'archaic' enumeration which uses only the even indices 2, 4, 6... to the modern form. Most striking in this context is the fact that the [[falling factorial#Real_numbers_and_negative_n|falling factorial]] {{math|''c''<sup>{{underline|''k''−1}}</sup>}} has for {{math|''k'' {{=}} 0}} the value {{math|{{sfrac|1|''c'' + 1}}}}.{{sfnp|Graham|Knuth|Patashnik|1989|loc=Section 2.51}} Thus Bernoulli's formula can be written | ||
: <math> \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \sum_{k=0}^c \frac{B_k}{k!}c^{\underline{k-1}} n^{c-k+1}</math> | : <math> \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \sum_{k=0}^c \frac{B_k}{k!}c^{\underline{k-1}} n^{c-k+1}</math> | ||
if {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} 1/2}}, recapturing the value Bernoulli gave to the coefficient at that position. | if {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} 1/2}}, recapturing the value Bernoulli gave to the coefficient at that position. | ||
The formula for <math>\textstyle \sum_{k=1}^n k^9</math> | The formula for <math>\textstyle \sum_{k=1}^n k^9</math> on page 97 of Bernoulli's ''Ars Conjectandi'' contains an error at the last term; it should be <math>-\tfrac {3}{20}n^2</math> instead of <math>-\tfrac {1}{12}n^2</math>. | ||
== Definitions == | == Definitions == | ||
| Line 164: | Line 172: | ||
\frac{te^t}{e^t - 1} = \frac{t}{1 - e^{-t}} &= \frac{t}{2} \left( \operatorname{coth} \frac{t}{2} +1 \right) &&= \sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac{B^+_m t^m}{m!}. | \frac{te^t}{e^t - 1} = \frac{t}{1 - e^{-t}} &= \frac{t}{2} \left( \operatorname{coth} \frac{t}{2} +1 \right) &&= \sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac{B^+_m t^m}{m!}. | ||
\end{alignat}</math> | \end{alignat}</math> | ||
where the substitution is <math>t \to - t</math>. The | where the substitution is <math>t \to - t</math>. The arithmetic difference between the generating functions for <math>B^+_m</math> and <math>B^{-}_m</math> is ''t''. | ||
{{collapse top|title=Proof}} | {{collapse top|title=Proof}} | ||
If we let <math>F(t)=\sum_{i=1}^\infty f_it^i</math> and <math>G(t)=1/(1+F(t))=\sum_{i=0}^\infty g_it^i</math> then | If we let <math>F(t)=\sum_{i=1}^\infty f_it^i</math> and <math>G(t)=1/(1+F(t))=\sum_{i=0}^\infty g_it^i</math> then | ||
| Line 201: | Line 209: | ||
== Bernoulli numbers and the Riemann zeta function == | == Bernoulli numbers and the Riemann zeta function == | ||
[[File:Bernoulli numbers and zeta of negative reals.png|thumb|400px|Bernoulli numbers, using 1/2 for B{{sub|1}}, related to the Riemann zeta function of negative real numbers.]] | |||
[[File: | [[File:Even-index Bernoulli numbers.png|thumb|400px|Absolute value of even-index Bernoulli numbers and relation to the Riemann zeta function]] | ||
The Bernoulli numbers can be expressed in terms of the [[Riemann zeta function]]: | The Bernoulli numbers can be expressed in terms of the [[Riemann zeta function]]: | ||
: | :<math> B_n^+ = -n\, \zeta(1-n) \quad </math> for {{math|''n'' ≥ 1}} . | ||
Here the argument of the zeta function is ''0 ''or negative. As <math>\zeta(k)</math> is zero for negative even integers (the [[Riemann_zeta_function#Zeros,_the_critical_line,_and_the_Riemann_hypothesis|trivial zeroes]]), if ''n>1'' is odd, <math>\zeta(1-n)</math> is zero. | Here the argument of the zeta function is ''0 ''or negative. As <math>\zeta(k)</math> is zero for negative even integers (the [[Riemann_zeta_function#Zeros,_the_critical_line,_and_the_Riemann_hypothesis|trivial zeroes]]), if ''n>1'' is odd, <math>\zeta(1-n)</math> is zero. | ||
| Line 212: | Line 220: | ||
By means of the zeta [[Riemann zeta function#Riemann's functional equation|functional equation]] and the gamma [[Gamma function#General|reflection formula]] the following relation can be obtained:{{sfnp|Arfken|1970|p=279}} | By means of the zeta [[Riemann zeta function#Riemann's functional equation|functional equation]] and the gamma [[Gamma function#General|reflection formula]] the following relation can be obtained:{{sfnp|Arfken|1970|p=279}} | ||
:<math> B_{2n} = \frac {(-1)^{n+1}2(2n)!} {(2\pi)^{2n}} \zeta(2n) \quad </math> for {{math|''n'' ≥ 1}} . | :<math> B_{2n} = \frac {(-1)^{n+1}2(2n)!} {(2\pi)^{2n}} \zeta(2n) \quad </math> for integers {{math|''n'' ≥ 1}} . | ||
Now the argument of the zeta function is positive. | Now the argument of the zeta function is positive. | ||
| Line 220: | Line 228: | ||
== Efficient computation of Bernoulli numbers == | == Efficient computation of Bernoulli numbers == | ||
[[File:Akiyama-tanigawa-triangle.png|400px|thumb|alt=A diagram showing an upside-down triangle of numbers. The top row consists of 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, and so on. Each number in the lower rows has two arrows pointing to it from two numbers in the row above, indicating those two numbers are used to compute the lower number. The numbers along the left edge of the triangle are circled; these are the Bernoulli numbers.|Visualization of the Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm for computing the Bernoulli numbers]] | |||
Akiyama and Tanigawa give a simple "triangle algorithm" (vis-à-vis [[Pascal's triangle]]) for computing the Bernoulli numbers.<ref name="akiyama2001">{{cite journal |last1=Akiyama |first1=Shigeki |last2=Tanigawa |first2=Yoshio |title=Multiple Zeta Values at Non-Positive Integers |journal=The Ramanujan Journal |date=1 December 2001 |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=327–351 |doi=10.1023/A:1013981102941 |url=https://www.math.tsukuba.ac.jp/~akiyama/papers/Mzvnrev.pdf |access-date=11 February 2026}}</ref> First let <math display="inline">b_{0,m} = \frac{1}{m+1}</math> (for m ≥ 0). Then successive terms in the triangle can be computed with the recurrence relation | |||
<math display="block">b_{n+1,m} = (m+1)(b_{n,m} - b_{n,m+1})</math> | |||
The terms <math display="inline">b_{n,0}</math> correspond to the {{mvar|n}}th Bernoulli number {{mvar|B<sub>n</sub>}}.<ref name="kaneko2000">{{cite journal |last1=Kaneko |first1=Masanobu |title=The Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm for Bernoulli numbers |journal=Journal of Integer Sequences |date=12 December 2000 |volume=3 |issue=1 |url=https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL3/KANEKO/AT-kaneko.pdf |access-date=11 February 2026}}</ref><ref name="kawasaki2023">{{cite journal |last1=Kawasaki |first1=Naho |last2=Ohno |first2=Yasuo |title=The Triangle Algorithm for Bernoulli Polynomials |journal=Integers |date=12 June 2023 |volume=23 |doi=10.5281/zenodo.8028914 |url=https://math.colgate.edu/~integers/x39/x39.pdf |access-date=11 February 2026}}</ref> | |||
[[Richard P. Brent|Brent]] and Harvey give several algorithms for computing the Bernoulli numbers, including a simple algorithm that is faster and uses less space than the Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm. It uses a recurrence to compute the [[tangent numbers]] {{mvar|T<sub>n</sub>}} and applies | |||
<math display="block">T_n = (-1)^{n-1}2^{2n}(2^{2n}-1)\frac{B_{2n}}{2n}</math> | |||
to compute the Bernoulli numbers. This is related to a method given by Knuth and Buckholtz.<ref name="brent2011">{{cite journal |last1=Brent |first1=Richard P. |last2=Harvey |first2=David |title=Fast Computation of Bernoulli, Tangent and Secant Numbers |journal=Computational and Analytical Mathematics |date=2013 |volume=50 |pages=127–142 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-7621-4_8 |url=https://arxiv.org/pdf/1108.0286v3 |access-date=11 February 2026|arxiv=1108.0286 }}</ref>{{r|KnuthBuckholtz1967}} | |||
In some applications it is useful to be able to compute the Bernoulli numbers {{math|''B''<sub>0</sub>}} through {{math|''B''<sub>''p'' − 3</sub>}} modulo {{mvar|p}}, where {{mvar|p}} is a prime; for example to test whether [[Vandiver's conjecture]] holds for {{mvar|p}}, or even just to determine whether {{mvar|p}} is an [[irregular prime]]. It is not feasible to carry out such a computation using the above recursive formulae, since at least (a constant multiple of) {{math|''p''<sup>2</sup>}} arithmetic operations would be required. Fortunately, faster methods have been developed{{r|BuhlerCraErnMetShokrollahi2001}} which require only {{math|''O''(''p'' (log ''p'')<sup>2</sup>)}} operations (see [[big-O notation|big {{mvar|O}} notation]]). | In some applications it is useful to be able to compute the Bernoulli numbers {{math|''B''<sub>0</sub>}} through {{math|''B''<sub>''p'' − 3</sub>}} modulo {{mvar|p}}, where {{mvar|p}} is a prime; for example to test whether [[Vandiver's conjecture]] holds for {{mvar|p}}, or even just to determine whether {{mvar|p}} is an [[irregular prime]]. It is not feasible to carry out such a computation using the above recursive formulae, since at least (a constant multiple of) {{math|''p''<sup>2</sup>}} arithmetic operations would be required. Fortunately, faster methods have been developed{{r|BuhlerCraErnMetShokrollahi2001}} which require only {{math|''O''(''p'' (log ''p'')<sup>2</sup>)}} operations (see [[big-O notation|big {{mvar|O}} notation]]). | ||
| Line 335: | Line 356: | ||
The definition to proceed with was developed by Julius Worpitzky in 1883. Besides elementary arithmetic only the factorial function {{math|''n''!}} and the power function {{math|''k<sup>m</sup>''}} is employed. The signless Worpitzky numbers are defined as | The definition to proceed with was developed by Julius Worpitzky in 1883. Besides elementary arithmetic only the factorial function {{math|''n''!}} and the power function {{math|''k<sup>m</sup>''}} is employed. The signless Worpitzky numbers are defined as | ||
: <math> W_{n,k}=\sum_{v=0}^k (-1)^{v+k} (v+1)^n | : <math> W_{n,k}=\sum_{v=0}^k (-1)^{v+k} (v+1)^n {k \choose v}\ . </math> | ||
They can also be expressed through the [[Stirling numbers of the second kind]] | They can also be expressed through the [[Stirling numbers of the second kind]] | ||
| Line 463: | Line 484: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The Akiyama–Tanigawa numbers satisfy a simple recurrence relation which can be exploited to iteratively compute the Bernoulli numbers | The Akiyama–Tanigawa numbers satisfy a simple recurrence relation which can be exploited to iteratively compute the Bernoulli numbers. See {{OEIS2C|id=A051714}}/{{OEIS2C|id=A051715}}. | ||
An ''autosequence'' is a sequence which has its inverse binomial transform equal to the signed sequence. If the main diagonal is zeroes = {{OEIS2C|id=A000004}}, the autosequence is of the first kind. Example: {{OEIS2C|id=A000045}}, the Fibonacci numbers. If the main diagonal is the first upper diagonal multiplied by 2, it is of the second kind. Example: {{OEIS2C|id=A164555}}/{{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}, the second Bernoulli numbers (see {{OEIS2C|id=A190339}}). The Akiyama–Tanigawa transform applied to {{math|''2''<sup>−''n''</sup>}} = 1/{{OEIS2C|id=A000079}} leads to {{OEIS2C|id=A198631}} (''n'') / {{OEIS2C|id=A06519}} (''n'' + 1). Hence: | An ''autosequence'' is a sequence which has its inverse binomial transform equal to the signed sequence. If the main diagonal is zeroes = {{OEIS2C|id=A000004}}, the autosequence is of the first kind. Example: {{OEIS2C|id=A000045}}, the Fibonacci numbers. If the main diagonal is the first upper diagonal multiplied by 2, it is of the second kind. Example: {{OEIS2C|id=A164555}}/{{OEIS2C|id=A027642}}, the second Bernoulli numbers (see {{OEIS2C|id=A190339}}). The Akiyama–Tanigawa transform applied to {{math|''2''<sup>−''n''</sup>}} = 1/{{OEIS2C|id=A000079}} leads to {{OEIS2C|id=A198631}} (''n'') / {{OEIS2C|id=A06519}} (''n'' + 1). Hence: | ||
| Line 496: | Line 517: | ||
===Connection with Pascal's triangle=== | ===Connection with Pascal's triangle=== | ||
There are formulas connecting Pascal's triangle to Bernoulli numbers{{efn|this formula was discovered (or perhaps rediscovered) by Giorgio Pietrocola. His demonstration is available in Italian language {{harv|Pietrocola|2008}}.}} | There are formulas connecting Pascal's triangle to Bernoulli numbers{{efn|this formula was discovered (or perhaps rediscovered) by Giorgio Pietrocola. His demonstration is available in Italian language {{harv|Pietrocola|2008}}.}} | ||
:<math> B^{+}_n=\frac{|A_n|}{(n+1)!}~~~</math> | :<math> B^{+}_n=\frac{|A_n|}{(n+1)!}~~~</math>with row-column definitions <math> | ||
[A_n]_{i, k} := \begin{cases} | |||
0 & \text{if } k>1+i \\ | 0 & \text{if } k>1+i \\ | ||
{i+1 \choose k-1} & \text{otherwise} | {i+1 \choose k-1} & \text{otherwise} | ||
\end{cases} | \end{cases} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
where <math>|A_n|</math> is the determinant of a n-by-n [[Hessenberg matrix]] part of [[Pascal's triangle]] | |||
Example: | Example: | ||
:<math> B^{+}_6 =\frac{ | :<math> B^{+}_6 =\frac{\begin{vmatrix} | ||
1& 2& 0& 0& 0& 0\\ | 1& 2& 0& 0& 0& 0\\ | ||
1& 3& 3& 0& 0& 0\\ | 1& 3& 3& 0& 0& 0\\ | ||
| Line 513: | Line 534: | ||
1& 6& 15& 20& 15& 6\\ | 1& 6& 15& 20& 15& 6\\ | ||
1& 7& 21& 35& 35& 21 | 1& 7& 21& 35& 35& 21 | ||
\end{ | \end{vmatrix}}{7!}=\frac{120}{5040}=\frac 1 {42} | ||
</math> | </math><ref>{{citation | first=Giorgio|last=Pietrocola |publisher=[[Academia.edu]]| title=On polynomials for the calculation of sums of powers of successive integers and Bernoulli numbers deduced from the Pascal's triangle| year=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/65324078}}. | ||
</ref> | |||
=== Connection with Eulerian numbers === | === Connection with Eulerian numbers === | ||
| Line 681: | Line 703: | ||
Similar to Seidel's approach D. E. Knuth and T. J. Buckholtz gave a recurrence equation for the numbers {{math|''T''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} and recommended this method for computing {{math|''B''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} and {{math|''E''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} 'on electronic computers using only simple operations on integers'.{{r|KnuthBuckholtz1967}} | Similar to Seidel's approach D. E. Knuth and T. J. Buckholtz gave a recurrence equation for the numbers {{math|''T''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} and recommended this method for computing {{math|''B''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} and {{math|''E''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} 'on electronic computers using only simple operations on integers'.{{r|KnuthBuckholtz1967}} | ||
V. I. Arnold{{r|Arnold1991}} rediscovered Seidel's algorithm and later Millar, Sloane and Young popularized Seidel's algorithm under the name [[boustrophedon transform]]. | [[V. I. Arnold]]{{r|Arnold1991}} rediscovered Seidel's algorithm and later Millar, Sloane and Young popularized Seidel's algorithm under the name [[boustrophedon transform]]. | ||
Triangular form: | Triangular form: | ||
| Line 855: | Line 877: | ||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
The coefficients are the [[Euler number]]s of odd and even index, respectively. In consequence the ordinary expansion of {{math|tan ''x'' + sec ''x''}} has as coefficients the rational numbers {{math|''S''<sub>''n''</sub>}}. | The coefficients are the [[Euler zigzag number]]s of odd and even index, respectively. In consequence the ordinary expansion of {{math|tan ''x'' + sec ''x''}} has as coefficients the rational numbers {{math|''S''<sub>''n''</sub>}}. | ||
: <math> \tan x + \sec x = 1 + x + \tfrac{1}{2}x^2 + \tfrac{1}{3}x^3 + \tfrac{5}{24}x^4 + \tfrac{2}{15}x^5 + \tfrac{61}{720}x^6 + \cdots </math> | : <math> \tan x + \sec x = 1 + x + \tfrac{1}{2}x^2 + \tfrac{1}{3}x^3 + \tfrac{5}{24}x^4 + \tfrac{2}{15}x^5 + \tfrac{61}{720}x^6 + \cdots </math> | ||
| Line 1,147: | Line 1,169: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references> | |||
<ref name=Weisstein2016>{{mathworld|id=BernoulliNumber |title=Bernoulli Number|mode=cs2}}</ref> | <ref name=Weisstein2016>{{mathworld|id=BernoulliNumber |title=Bernoulli Number|mode=cs2}}</ref> | ||
| Line 1,171: | Line 1,192: | ||
<ref name=Pavlyk29Apr2008>{{citation |last=Pavlyk |first=Oleksandr |date=29 April 2008 |title=Today We Broke the Bernoulli Record: From the Analytical Engine to Mathematica |website=Wolfram News |url=http://blog.wolfram.com/2008/04/29/today-we-broke-the-bernoulli-record-from-the-analytical-engine-to-mathematica/}}.</ref> | <ref name=Pavlyk29Apr2008>{{citation |last=Pavlyk |first=Oleksandr |date=29 April 2008 |title=Today We Broke the Bernoulli Record: From the Analytical Engine to Mathematica |website=Wolfram News |url=http://blog.wolfram.com/2008/04/29/today-we-broke-the-bernoulli-record-from-the-analytical-engine-to-mathematica/}}.</ref> | ||
<ref name=GuoZeng2005>{{citation |last1=Guo |first1=Victor J. W. |last2=Zeng |first2=Jiang |date=30 August 2005 |title=A q-Analogue of Faulhaber's Formula for Sums of Powers |journal=The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics |volume=11 |issue=2 |doi=10.37236/1876 |bibcode=2005math......1441G |arxiv=math/0501441 |s2cid=10467873 }}</ref> | <ref name=GuoZeng2005>{{citation |last1=Guo |first1=Victor J. W. |last2=Zeng |first2=Jiang |date=30 August 2005 |title=A q-Analogue of Faulhaber's Formula for Sums of Powers |journal=The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics |volume=11 |issue=2 |article-number=R19 |doi=10.37236/1876 |bibcode=2005math......1441G |arxiv=math/0501441 |s2cid=10467873 }}</ref> | ||
<!--<ref name=Comtet1974>{{citation |last=Comtet |first=L. |date=1974 |title=Advanced combinatorics. The art of finite and infinite expansions|edition=Revised and Enlarged |location=Dordrecht-Boston |publisher=D. Reidel Publ.}}</ref> --> | <!--<ref name=Comtet1974>{{citation |last=Comtet |first=L. |date=1974 |title=Advanced combinatorics. The art of finite and infinite expansions|edition=Revised and Enlarged |location=Dordrecht-Boston |publisher=D. Reidel Publ.}}</ref> --> | ||
| Line 1,226: | Line 1,247: | ||
<ref name=BK>{{citation |last1=Bannai |first1=Kenichi |last2=Kobayashi |first2=Shinichi |year=2010 |title=Algebraic theta functions and the p-adic interpolation of Eisenstein-Kronecker numbers |url=https://projecteuclid.org/journals/duke-mathematical-journal/volume-153/issue-2/Algebraic-theta-functions-and-the-p-adic-interpolation-of-Eisenstein/10.1215/00127094-2010-024.full |journal=[[Duke Mathematical Journal]] |volume=153 |issue=2 |doi=10.1215/00127094-2010-024 |arxiv=math/0610163 |s2cid=9262012 |issn=0012-7094}}</ref> | <ref name=BK>{{citation |last1=Bannai |first1=Kenichi |last2=Kobayashi |first2=Shinichi |year=2010 |title=Algebraic theta functions and the p-adic interpolation of Eisenstein-Kronecker numbers |url=https://projecteuclid.org/journals/duke-mathematical-journal/volume-153/issue-2/Algebraic-theta-functions-and-the-p-adic-interpolation-of-Eisenstein/10.1215/00127094-2010-024.full |journal=[[Duke Mathematical Journal]] |volume=153 |issue=2 |doi=10.1215/00127094-2010-024 |arxiv=math/0610163 |s2cid=9262012 |issn=0012-7094}}</ref> | ||
</references> | |||
== Bibliography == | == Bibliography == | ||
* {{citation |last1=Abramowitz |first1=M. |last2=Stegun |first2=I. A. |contribution=§23.1: Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials and the Euler-Maclaurin Formula |title=Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables |edition=9th printing |location=New York |publisher=Dover Publications|pages=804–806 |date=1972}}. | * {{citation |last1=Abramowitz |first1=M. |last2=Stegun |first2=I. A. |contribution=§23.1: Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials and the Euler-Maclaurin Formula |title=[[Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables]] |edition=9th printing |location=New York |publisher=Dover Publications|pages=804–806 |date=1972}}. | ||
* {{citation|last=Arfken |first=George |date=1970 |title=Mathematical methods for physicists |edition=2nd |publisher=Academic Press |bibcode=1970mmp..book.....A |isbn=978-0120598519}} | * {{citation|last=Arfken |first=George |date=1970 |title=Mathematical methods for physicists |edition=2nd |publisher=Academic Press |bibcode=1970mmp..book.....A |isbn=978-0120598519}} | ||
* {{citation |first=D. |last=Arlettaz |title=Die Bernoulli-Zahlen: eine Beziehung zwischen Topologie und Gruppentheorie |journal=Math. Semesterber |volume=45 |date=1998 |pages=61–75 |doi=10.1007/s005910050037|s2cid=121753654 }}. | * {{citation |first=D. |last=Arlettaz |title=Die Bernoulli-Zahlen: eine Beziehung zwischen Topologie und Gruppentheorie |journal=Math. Semesterber |volume=45 |date=1998 |pages=61–75 |doi=10.1007/s005910050037|s2cid=121753654 }}. | ||
| Line 1,248: | Line 1,268: | ||
*{{citation |title=TheLostBernoulliNumbers |last=Luschny |first=Peter |work=OeisWiki |date=8 October 2011 |access-date=11 May 2019 |url= http://oeis.org/wiki/User:Peter_Luschny/TheLostBernoulliNumbers}}. | *{{citation |title=TheLostBernoulliNumbers |last=Luschny |first=Peter |work=OeisWiki |date=8 October 2011 |access-date=11 May 2019 |url= http://oeis.org/wiki/User:Peter_Luschny/TheLostBernoulliNumbers}}. | ||
*{{citation |title=The Mathematics Genealogy Project |date=n.d. |location=Fargo |publisher=Department of Mathematics, North Dakota State University |access-date=11 May 2019 |url=https://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/ |ref={{SfnRef|Mathematics Genealogy Project|n.d.}} |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510171712/https://genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/ |archive-date=10 May 2019 |url-status=dead }}. | *{{citation |title=The Mathematics Genealogy Project |date=n.d. |location=Fargo |publisher=Department of Mathematics, North Dakota State University |access-date=11 May 2019 |url=https://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/ |ref={{SfnRef|Mathematics Genealogy Project|n.d.}} |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510171712/https://genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/ |archive-date=10 May 2019 |url-status=dead }}. | ||
*{{citation |first1=John W. |last1=Milnor |author-link1=John Milnor |first2=James D. |last2=Stasheff |contribution=Appendix B: Bernoulli Numbers |pages=281–287 |title=Characteristic Classes |series=Annals of Mathematics Studies |volume=76 |publisher=Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press |date=1974}}. | *{{citation |first1=John W. |last1=Milnor |author-link1=John Milnor |first2=James D. |last2=Stasheff |contribution=Appendix B: Bernoulli Numbers |pages=281–287 |title=Characteristic Classes |series=Annals of Mathematics Studies |volume=76 |publisher=Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press |date=1974}}. | ||
* {{citation |url=http://www.maecla.it/Matematica/sommapotenze/teorema_1B.htm#teorema1b |title=Esplorando un antico sentiero: teoremi sulla somma di potenze di interi successivi (Corollario 2b)|last=Pietrocola |first=Giorgio |date=October 31, 2008 |website=Maecla |access-date=April 8, 2017|language=it}}. | * {{citation |url=http://www.maecla.it/Matematica/sommapotenze/teorema_1B.htm#teorema1b |title=Esplorando un antico sentiero: teoremi sulla somma di potenze di interi successivi (Corollario 2b)|last=Pietrocola |first=Giorgio |date=October 31, 2008 |website=Maecla |access-date=April 8, 2017|language=it}}. | ||
| Line 1,275: | Line 1,294: | ||
[[Category:Topology]] | [[Category:Topology]] | ||
[[Category:Integer sequences]] | [[Category:Integer sequences]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:01, 17 May 2026
Template:Use shortened footnotes
| n | fraction | decimal |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | +1.000000000 |
| 1 | ±1/2 | ±0.500000000 |
| 2 | 1/6 | +0.166666666 |
| 3 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 4 | −1/30 | −0.033333333 |
| 5 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 6 | 1/42 | +0.023809523 |
| 7 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 8 | −1/30 | −0.033333333 |
| 9 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 10 | 5/66 | +0.075757575 |
| 11 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 12 | −691/2730 | −0.253113553 |
| 13 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 14 | 7/6 | +1.166666666 |
| 15 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 16 | −3617/510 | −7.092156862 |
| 17 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 18 | 43867/798 | +54.97117794 |
| 19 | 0 | +0.000000000 |
| 20 | −174611/330 | −529.1242424 |
In mathematics, the Bernoulli numbers Bn are a sequence of rational numbers which occur frequently in analysis. The Bernoulli numbers appear in (and can be defined by) the Taylor series expansions of the tangent and hyperbolic tangent functions, in Faulhaber's formula for the sum of m-th powers of the first n positive integers, in the Euler–Maclaurin formula, and in expressions for certain values of the Riemann zeta function.
The values of the first 20 Bernoulli numbers are given in the adjacent table. Two conventions are used in the literature, denoted here by Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{-{}}_n} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{+{}}_n} ; they differ only for n = 1, where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{-{}}_1=-1/2} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{+{}}_1=+1/2} . For every odd n > 1, Bn = 0. For every even n > 0, Bn is negative if n is divisible by 4 and positive otherwise. The Bernoulli numbers are special values of the Bernoulli polynomials Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_n(x)} , with Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{-{}}_n=B_n(0)} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^+_n=B_n(1)} .[1]
The Bernoulli numbers were discovered around the same time by the Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli, after whom they are named, and independently by Japanese mathematician Seki Takakazu. Seki's discovery was posthumously published in 1712[2][3][4] in his work Katsuyō Sanpō; Bernoulli's, also posthumously, in his Ars Conjectandi of 1713. Ada Lovelace's note G on the Analytical Engine from 1842 describes an algorithm for generating Bernoulli numbers with Babbage's machine;[5] it is disputed whether Lovelace or Babbage developed the algorithm. As a result, the Bernoulli numbers have the distinction of being the subject of the first published complex computer program.
Notation
The superscript ± used in this article distinguishes the two sign conventions for Bernoulli numbers. Only the n = 1 term is affected:
- B−
n with B−
1 = −1/2 (Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C) is the sign convention prescribed by NIST and many modern textbooks.[6] - B+
n with B+
1 = +1/2 (Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C) was used in the older literature,[1] and (since 2022) by Donald Knuth[7] following Peter Luschny's "Bernoulli Manifesto".[8]
In the formulas below, one can switch from one sign convention to the other with the relation Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_n^{+}=(-1)^n B_n^{-}} , or for integer n = 2 or greater, simply ignore it.
Since Bn = 0 for all odd n > 1, and many formulas only involve even-index Bernoulli numbers, a few authors write "Bn" instead of B2n . This article does not follow that notation.
History
Early history
The Bernoulli numbers are rooted in the early history of the computation of sums of integer powers, which have been of interest to mathematicians since antiquity.
Methods to calculate the sum of the first n positive integers, the sum of the squares and of the cubes of the first n positive integers were known, but there were no real 'formulas', only descriptions given entirely in words. Among the great mathematicians of antiquity to consider this problem were Pythagoras (c. 572–497 BCE, Greece), Archimedes (287–212 BCE, Italy), Aryabhata (b. 476, India), Al-Karaji (d. 1019, Persia) and Ibn al-Haytham (965–1039, Iraq).
During the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries mathematicians made significant progress. In the West Thomas Harriot (1560–1621) of England, Johann Faulhaber (1580–1635) of Germany, Pierre de Fermat (1601–1665) and fellow French mathematician Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) all played important roles.
Thomas Harriot seems to have been the first to derive and write formulas for sums of powers using symbolic notation, but even he calculated only up to the sum of the fourth powers. Johann Faulhaber gave formulas for sums of powers up to the 17th power in his 1631 Academia Algebrae, far higher than anyone before him, but he did not give a general formula.
Blaise Pascal in 1654 proved Pascal's identity relating (n+1)k+1 to the sums of the pth powers of the first n positive integers for p = 0, 1, 2, ..., k.
The Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli (1654–1705) was the first to realize the existence of a single sequence of constants B0, B1, B2,... which provide a uniform formula for all sums of powers.[9]
The joy Bernoulli experienced when he hit upon the pattern needed to compute quickly and easily the coefficients of his formula for the sum of the cth powers for any positive integer c can be seen from his comment. He wrote:
- "With the help of this table, it took me less than half of a quarter of an hour to find that the tenth powers of the first 1000 numbers being added together will yield the sum 91,409,924,241,424,243,424,241,924,242,500."
Bernoulli's result was published posthumously in Ars Conjectandi in 1713. Seki Takakazu independently discovered the Bernoulli numbers and his result was published a year earlier, also posthumously, in 1712.[2] However, Seki did not present his method as a formula based on a sequence of constants.
Bernoulli's formula for sums of powers is the most useful and generalizable formulation to date. The coefficients in Bernoulli's formula are now called Bernoulli numbers, following a suggestion of Abraham de Moivre.
Bernoulli's formula is sometimes called Faulhaber's formula after Johann Faulhaber who found remarkable ways to calculate sum of powers but never stated Bernoulli's formula. According to Knuth[9] a rigorous proof of Faulhaber's formula was first published by Carl Jacobi in 1834.[10] Knuth's in-depth study of Faulhaber's formula concludes:
- "Faulhaber never discovered the Bernoulli numbers; i.e., he never realized that a single sequence of constants B0, B1, B2, ... would provide a uniform
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\textstyle \sum n^m = \frac 1{m+1}\left( B_0n^{m+1}-\binom{m+1} 1 B_1 n^m+\binom{m+1} 2B_2n^{m-1}-\cdots +(-1)^m\binom{m+1}mB_mn\right) }
- for all sums of powers. He never mentioned, for example, the fact that almost half of the coefficients turned out to be zero after he had converted his formulas for Σ nm from polynomials in N to polynomials in n."[11]
In the above Knuth meant Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_1^-} ; instead using Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_1^+} the formula avoids subtraction:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\textstyle \sum n^m = \frac 1{m+1}\left( B_0n^{m+1}+\binom{m+1} 1 B^+_1 n^m+\binom{m+1} 2B_2n^{m-1}+\cdots+\binom{m+1}mB_mn\right). }
Reconstruction of "Summæ Potestatum"
The Bernoulli numbers Template:OEIS2C(n)/Template:OEIS2C(n) were introduced by Jacob Bernoulli in the book Ars Conjectandi published posthumously in 1713.[12] The main formula can be seen in the second half of the corresponding facsimile. The constant coefficients denoted A, B, C and D by Bernoulli are mapped to the notation which is now prevalent as A = B2, B = B4, C = B6, D = B8. The expression c·c−1·c−2·c−3 means c·(c−1)·(c−2)·(c−3) – the small dots are used as grouping symbols. Using today's terminology these expressions are falling factorial powers ck. The factorial notation k! as a shortcut for 1 × 2 × ... × k was introduced much later in 1808 by Christian Kramp. The integral symbol ∫ on the left hand side goes back to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in 1675 who used it as a long letter S for "summa" (sum).[13] The letter n on the left hand side is not an index of summation but gives the upper limit of the range of summation which is to be understood as 1, 2, ..., n. Putting things together, for positive c, today a mathematician is likely to write Bernoulli's formula as:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \frac{n^{c+1}}{c+1}+\frac 1 2 n^c+\sum_{k=2}^c \frac{B_k}{k!} c^{\underline{k-1}}n^{c-k+1}.}
This formula suggests setting B1 = 1/2 when switching from the so-called 'archaic' enumeration which uses only the even indices 2, 4, 6... to the modern form. Most striking in this context is the fact that the falling factorial ck−1 has for k = 0 the value 1/c + 1.[14] Thus Bernoulli's formula can be written
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^n k^c = \sum_{k=0}^c \frac{B_k}{k!}c^{\underline{k-1}} n^{c-k+1}}
if B1 = 1/2, recapturing the value Bernoulli gave to the coefficient at that position.
The formula for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \textstyle \sum_{k=1}^n k^9} on page 97 of Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi contains an error at the last term; it should be Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle -\tfrac {3}{20}n^2} instead of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle -\tfrac {1}{12}n^2} .
Definitions
Many characterizations of the Bernoulli numbers have been found in the last 300 years, and each could be used to introduce these numbers. Here only four of the most useful ones are mentioned:
- a recursive equation,
- an explicit formula,
- a generating function,
- an integral expression.
For the proof of the equivalence of the four approaches, see Ireland & Rosen (1990) or Conway & Guy (1996).
Recursive definition
The Bernoulli numbers obey the sum formulas[1]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \sum_{k=0}^{m}\binom {m+1} k B^{-{}}_k &= \delta_{m, 0} \\ \sum_{k=0}^{m}\binom {m+1} k B^{+{}}_k &= m+1 \end{align}}
where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle m=0,1,2...} and δ denotes the Kronecker delta.
The first of these is sometimes written[15] as the formula (for m > 1) Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (B+1)^m-B_m=0,} where the power is expanded formally using the binomial theorem and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^k} is replaced by Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_k} .
Solving for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{\mp{}}_m} gives the recursive formulas[16]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} B_m^{-{}} &= \delta_{m, 0} - \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \binom{m}{k} \frac{B^{-{}}_k}{m - k + 1} \\ B_m^+ &= 1 - \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \binom{m}{k} \frac{B^+_k}{m - k + 1}. \end{align}}
Explicit definition
In 1893 Louis Saalschütz listed a total of 38 explicit formulas for the Bernoulli numbers,[17] usually giving some reference in the older literature. One of them is (for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle m\geq 1} ):
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} B^-_m &= \sum_{k=0}^m \frac1{k+1} \sum_{j=0}^k \binom{k}{j} (-1)^j j^m \\ B^+_m &= \sum_{k=0}^m \frac1{k+1} \sum_{j=0}^k \binom{k}{j} (-1)^j (j + 1)^m. \end{align}}
Generating function
The exponential generating functions are
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{alignat}{3} \frac{t}{e^t - 1} &= \frac{t}{2} \left( \operatorname{coth} \frac{t}{2} -1 \right) &&= \sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac{B^{-{}}_m t^m}{m!}\\ \frac{te^t}{e^t - 1} = \frac{t}{1 - e^{-t}} &= \frac{t}{2} \left( \operatorname{coth} \frac{t}{2} +1 \right) &&= \sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac{B^+_m t^m}{m!}. \end{alignat}}
where the substitution is Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle t \to - t} . The arithmetic difference between the generating functions for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^+_m} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{-}_m} is t.
Proof
|
|---|
|
If we let Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle F(t)=\sum_{i=1}^\infty f_it^i} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle G(t)=1/(1+F(t))=\sum_{i=0}^\infty g_it^i} then
Then Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle g_0=1} and for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle m>0} the mth term in the series for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle G(t)} is:
If
then we find that
showing that the values of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle i!g_i} obey the recursive formula for the Bernoulli numbers Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^-_i} . |
The (ordinary) generating function
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle z^{-1} \psi_1(z^{-1}) = \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} B^+_m z^m}
is an asymptotic series. It contains the trigamma function ψ1.
Integral Expression
From the generating functions above, one can obtain the following integral formula for the even Bernoulli numbers:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_{2n} = 4n (-1)^{n+1} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{t^{2n-1}}{e^{2 \pi t} -1 } \mathrm{d} t }
Bernoulli numbers and the Riemann zeta function
The Bernoulli numbers can be expressed in terms of the Riemann zeta function:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_n^+ = -n\, \zeta(1-n) \quad } for n ≥ 1 .
Here the argument of the zeta function is 0 or negative. As Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \zeta(k)} is zero for negative even integers (the trivial zeroes), if n>1 is odd, Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \zeta(1-n)} is zero.
By means of the zeta functional equation and the gamma reflection formula the following relation can be obtained:[18]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_{2n} = \frac {(-1)^{n+1}2(2n)!} {(2\pi)^{2n}} \zeta(2n) \quad } for integers n ≥ 1 .
Now the argument of the zeta function is positive.
It then follows from ζ → 1 (n → ∞) and Stirling's formula that
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle |B_{2 n}| \sim 4 \sqrt{\pi n} \left(\frac{n}{ \pi e} \right)^{2n} \quad } for n → ∞ .
Efficient computation of Bernoulli numbers
Akiyama and Tanigawa give a simple "triangle algorithm" (vis-à-vis Pascal's triangle) for computing the Bernoulli numbers.[19] First let Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\textstyle b_{0,m} = \frac{1}{m+1}} (for m ≥ 0). Then successive terms in the triangle can be computed with the recurrence relation
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle b_{n+1,m} = (m+1)(b_{n,m} - b_{n,m+1})}
The terms Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\textstyle b_{n,0}} correspond to the nth Bernoulli number Bn.[20][21]
Brent and Harvey give several algorithms for computing the Bernoulli numbers, including a simple algorithm that is faster and uses less space than the Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm. It uses a recurrence to compute the tangent numbers Tn and applies
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle T_n = (-1)^{n-1}2^{2n}(2^{2n}-1)\frac{B_{2n}}{2n}}
to compute the Bernoulli numbers. This is related to a method given by Knuth and Buckholtz.[22][23]
In some applications it is useful to be able to compute the Bernoulli numbers B0 through Bp − 3 modulo p, where p is a prime; for example to test whether Vandiver's conjecture holds for p, or even just to determine whether p is an irregular prime. It is not feasible to carry out such a computation using the above recursive formulae, since at least (a constant multiple of) p2 arithmetic operations would be required. Fortunately, faster methods have been developed[24] which require only O(p (log p)2) operations (see big O notation).
David Harvey[25] describes an algorithm for computing Bernoulli numbers by computing Bn modulo p for many small primes p, and then reconstructing Bn via the Chinese remainder theorem. Harvey writes that the asymptotic time complexity of this algorithm is O(n2 log(n)2 + ε) and claims that this implementation is significantly faster than implementations based on other methods. Using this implementation Harvey computed Bn for n = 108. Harvey's implementation has been included in SageMath since version 3.1. Prior to that, Bernd Kellner[26] computed Bn to full precision for n = 106 in December 2002 and Oleksandr Pavlyk[27] for n = 107 with Mathematica in April 2008.
Computer Year n Digits* J. Bernoulli ~1689 10 1 L. Euler 1748 30 8 J. C. Adams 1878 62 36 D. E. Knuth, T. J. Buckholtz 1967 1672 3330 G. Fee, S. Plouffe 1996 10000 27677 G. Fee, S. Plouffe 1996 100000 376755 B. C. Kellner 2002 1000000 4767529 O. Pavlyk 2008 10000000 57675260 D. Harvey 2008 100000000 676752569
- * Digits is to be understood as the exponent of 10 when Bn is written as a real number in normalized scientific notation.
Applications of the Bernoulli numbers
Asymptotic analysis
Arguably the most important application of the Bernoulli numbers in mathematics is their use in the Euler–Maclaurin formula. Assuming that f is a sufficiently often differentiable function the Euler–Maclaurin formula can be written as[28]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{k=a}^{b-1} f(k) = \int_a^b f(x)\,dx + \sum_{k=1}^m \frac{B^-_k}{k!} (f^{(k-1)}(b)-f^{(k-1)}(a))+R_-(f,m).}
This formulation assumes the convention B−
1 = −1/2. Using the convention B+
1 = +1/2 the formula becomes
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{k=a+1}^{b} f(k) = \int_a^b f(x)\,dx + \sum_{k=1}^m \frac{B^+_k}{k!} (f^{(k-1)}(b)-f^{(k-1)}(a))+R_+(f,m).}
Here Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle f^{(0)}=f} (i.e. the zeroth-order derivative of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle f} is just Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle f} ). Moreover, let Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle f^{(-1)}} denote an antiderivative of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle f} . By the fundamental theorem of calculus,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \int_a^b f(x)\,dx = f^{(-1)}(b) - f^{(-1)}(a).}
Thus the last formula can be further simplified to the following succinct form of the Euler–Maclaurin formula
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{k=a+1}^{b} f(k)= \sum_{k=0}^m \frac{B_k}{k!} (f^{(k-1)}(b)-f^{(k-1)}(a))+R(f,m). }
This form is for example the source for the important Euler–Maclaurin expansion of the zeta function
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \zeta(s) & =\sum_{k=0}^m \frac{B^+_k}{k!} s^{\overline{k-1}} + R(s,m) \\ & = \frac{B_0}{0!}s^{\overline{-1}} + \frac{B^+_1}{1!} s^{\overline{0}} + \frac{B_2}{2!} s^{\overline{1}} +\cdots+R(s,m) \\ & = \frac{1}{s-1} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{12}s + \cdots + R(s,m). \end{align} }
Here sk denotes the rising factorial power.[29]
Bernoulli numbers are also frequently used in other kinds of asymptotic expansions. The following example is the classical Poincaré-type asymptotic expansion of the digamma function ψ.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \psi(z) \sim \ln z - \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{B^+_k}{k z^k} }
Sum of powers
Bernoulli numbers feature prominently in the closed form expression of the sum of the mth powers of the first n positive integers. For m, n ≥ 0 define
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S_m(n) = \sum_{k=1}^n k^m = 1^m + 2^m + \cdots + n^m. }
This expression can always be rewritten as a polynomial in n of degree m + 1. The coefficients of these polynomials are related to the Bernoulli numbers by Bernoulli's formula:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S_m(n) = \frac{1}{m + 1} \sum_{k=0}^m \binom{m + 1}{k} B^+_k n^{m + 1 - k} = m! \sum_{k=0}^m \frac{B^+_k n^{m + 1 - k}}{k! (m+1-k)!} ,}
where (m + 1
k) denotes the binomial coefficient.
For example, taking m to be 1 gives the triangular numbers 0, 1, 3, 6, ... Template:OEIS2C.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 1 + 2 + \cdots + n = \frac{1}{2} (B_0 n^2 + 2 B^+_1 n^1) = \tfrac12 (n^2 + n).}
Taking m to be 2 gives the square pyramidal numbers 0, 1, 5, 14, ... Template:OEIS2C.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 1^2 + 2^2 + \cdots + n^2 = \frac{1}{3} (B_0 n^3 + 3 B^+_1 n^2 + 3 B_2 n^1) = \tfrac13 \left(n^3 + \tfrac32 n^2 + \tfrac12 n\right).}
Some authors use the alternate convention for Bernoulli numbers and state Bernoulli's formula in this way:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S_m(n) = \frac{1}{m + 1} \sum_{k=0}^m (-1)^k \binom{m + 1}{k} B^{-{}}_k n^{m + 1 - k}.}
Bernoulli's formula is sometimes called Faulhaber's formula after Johann Faulhaber who also found remarkable ways to calculate sums of powers.
Faulhaber's formula was generalized by V. Guo and J. Zeng to a q-analog.[30]
Taylor series
The Bernoulli numbers appear in the Taylor series expansion of many trigonometric functions and hyperbolic functions.
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \tan x &= \hphantom{{1\over x}} \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n-1} 2^{2n} (2^{2n}-1) B_{2n} }{(2n)!}\; x^{2n-1}, && \left|x \right| < \frac \pi 2. \\ \cot x &= {1\over x} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n B_{2n} (2x)^{2n}}{(2n)!}, & 0 < & |x| < \pi. \\ \tanh x &= \hphantom{{1\over x}} \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2^{2n}(2^{2n}-1)B_{2n}}{(2n)!}\;x^{2n-1}, && |x| < \frac \pi 2. \\ \coth x &= {1\over x} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{B_{2n} (2x)^{2n}}{(2n)!}, & 0 < & |x| < \pi. \end{align}}
Laurent series
The Bernoulli numbers appear in the following Laurent series:[31]
Digamma function: Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \psi(z)= \ln z- \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {B_k^{+{}}} {k z^k} }
Use in topology
The Kervaire–Milnor formula for the order of the cyclic group of diffeomorphism classes of exotic (4n − 1)-spheres which bound parallelizable manifolds involves Bernoulli numbers. Let ESn be the number of such exotic spheres for n ≥ 2, then
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \textit{ES}_n = (2^{2n-2}-2^{4n-3}) \operatorname{Numerator}\left(\frac{B_{4n}}{4n} \right) .}
The Hirzebruch signature theorem for the L genus of a smooth oriented closed manifold of dimension 4n also involves Bernoulli numbers.
Connections with combinatorial numbers
The connection of the Bernoulli number to various kinds of combinatorial numbers is based on the classical theory of finite differences and on the combinatorial interpretation of the Bernoulli numbers as an instance of a fundamental combinatorial principle, the inclusion–exclusion principle.
Connection with Worpitzky numbers
The definition to proceed with was developed by Julius Worpitzky in 1883. Besides elementary arithmetic only the factorial function n! and the power function km is employed. The signless Worpitzky numbers are defined as
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle W_{n,k}=\sum_{v=0}^k (-1)^{v+k} (v+1)^n {k \choose v}\ . }
They can also be expressed through the Stirling numbers of the second kind
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle W_{n,k}=k! \left\{ {n+1\atop k+1} \right\}.}
A Bernoulli number is then introduced as an inclusion–exclusion sum of Worpitzky numbers weighted by the harmonic sequence 1, 1/2, 1/3, ...
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k \frac{W_{n,k}}{k+1}\ =\ \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k+1} \sum_{v=0}^k (-1)^v (v+1)^n {k \choose v}\ . }
- B0 = 1
- B1 = 1 − 1/2
- B2 = 1 − 3/2 + 2/3
- B3 = 1 − 7/2 + 12/3 − 6/4
- B4 = 1 − 15/2 + 50/3 − 60/4 + 24/5
- B5 = 1 − 31/2 + 180/3 − 390/4 + 360/5 − 120/6
- B6 = 1 − 63/2 + 602/3 − 2100/4 + 3360/5 − 2520/6 + 720/7
This representation has B+
1 = +1/2.
Consider the sequence sn, n ≥ 0. From Worpitzky's numbers Template:OEIS2C, Template:OEIS2C applied to s0, s0, s1, s0, s1, s2, s0, s1, s2, s3, ... is identical to the Akiyama–Tanigawa transform applied to sn (see Connection with Stirling numbers of the first kind). This can be seen via the table:
Identity of
Worpitzky's representation and Akiyama–Tanigawa transform1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 −1 0 2 −2 0 0 3 −3 0 0 0 4 −4 1 −3 2 0 4 −10 6 0 0 9 −21 12 1 −7 12 −6 0 8 −38 54 −24 1 −15 50 −60 24
The first row represents s0, s1, s2, s3, s4.
Hence for the second fractional Euler numbers Template:OEIS2C (n) / Template:OEIS2C (n + 1):
- E0 = 1
- E1 = 1 − 1/2
- E2 = 1 − 3/2 + 2/4
- E3 = 1 − 7/2 + 12/4 − 6/8
- E4 = 1 − 15/2 + 50/4 − 60/8 + 24/16
- E5 = 1 − 31/2 + 180/4 − 390/8 + 360/16 − 120/32
- E6 = 1 − 63/2 + 602/4 − 2100/8 + 3360/16 − 2520/32 + 720/64
A second formula representing the Bernoulli numbers by the Worpitzky numbers is for n ≥ 1
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_n=\frac n {2^{n+1}-2}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (-2)^{-k}\, W_{n-1,k} . }
The simplified second Worpitzky's representation of the second Bernoulli numbers is:
Template:OEIS2C (n + 1) / Template:OEIS2C(n + 1) = n + 1/2n + 2 − 2 × Template:OEIS2C(n) / Template:OEIS2C(n + 1)
which links the second Bernoulli numbers to the second fractional Euler numbers. The beginning is:
- 1/2, 1/6, 0, −1/30, 0, 1/42, ... = (1/2, 1/3, 3/14, 2/15, 5/62, 1/21, ...) × (1, 1/2, 0, −1/4, 0, 1/2, ...)
The numerators of the first parentheses are Template:OEIS2C (see Connection with Stirling numbers of the first kind).
Connection with Stirling numbers of the second kind
Stirling numbers of the second kind, S(k,m), have the property that[32]:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle x^k=\sum_{m=0}^k {x^{\underline{m}}} S(k,m)}
where xm denotes the falling factorial function.
The Bernoulli polynomials Bk(x) can be written as:[33]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_k(x)=k\sum_{m=0}^{k-1}\binom{x}{m+1}S(k-1,m)m!+B_k }
where Bk for k = 0, 1, 2,... are the Bernoulli numbers.
The following property of the binomial coefficient:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \binom{x}{m}=\binom{x+1}{m+1}-\binom{x}{m+1} }
thus implies that
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle x^k=\frac{B_{k+1}(x+1)-B_{k+1}(x)}{k+1}. }
One also has the following for Bernoulli polynomials,[33]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_k(x)=\sum_{n=0}^k \binom{k}{n} B_n x^{k-n}. }
The coefficient of x in (x
m + 1) is (−1)m/m + 1.
The coefficient of x in the first expression for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_k(x)} is Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle k\sum_{m=0}^{k-1}\frac{(-1)^m}{m+1}S(k-1,m)m!} whereas in the second expression it is Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle kB_{k-1}.} Replacing Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle k-1} by Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle k} this yields:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_k=\sum_{m=0}^k (-1)^m \frac{m!}{m+1} S(k,m)}
(resulting in B1 = +1/2) which is an explicit formula for Bernoulli numbers and can be used to prove Von-Staudt Clausen theorem.[34][35][36]
Connection with Stirling numbers of the first kind
The two main formulas relating the unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind [n
m] to the Bernoulli numbers (with B1 = +1/2) are
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{1}{m!}\sum_{k=0}^m (-1)^{k} \left[{m+1\atop k+1}\right] B_k = \frac{1}{m+1}, }
and the inversion of this sum (for n ≥ 0, m ≥ 0)
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{1}{m!}\sum_{k=0}^m (-1)^k \left[{m+1\atop k+1}\right] B_{n+k} = A_{n,m}. }
Here the number An,m are the rational Akiyama–Tanigawa numbers, the first few of which are displayed in the following table.
Akiyama–Tanigawa number mn0 1 2 3 4 0 1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 ... 2 1/6 1/6 3/20 ... ... 3 0 1/30 ... ... ... 4 −1/30 ... ... ... ...
The Akiyama–Tanigawa numbers satisfy a simple recurrence relation which can be exploited to iteratively compute the Bernoulli numbers. See Template:OEIS2C/Template:OEIS2C.
An autosequence is a sequence which has its inverse binomial transform equal to the signed sequence. If the main diagonal is zeroes = Template:OEIS2C, the autosequence is of the first kind. Example: Template:OEIS2C, the Fibonacci numbers. If the main diagonal is the first upper diagonal multiplied by 2, it is of the second kind. Example: Template:OEIS2C/Template:OEIS2C, the second Bernoulli numbers (see Template:OEIS2C). The Akiyama–Tanigawa transform applied to 2−n = 1/Template:OEIS2C leads to Template:OEIS2C (n) / Template:OEIS2C (n + 1). Hence:
Akiyama–Tanigawa transform for the second Euler numbers mn0 1 2 3 4 0 1 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16 1 1/2 1/2 3/8 1/4 ... 2 0 1/4 3/8 ... ... 3 −1/4 −1/4 ... ... ... 4 0 ... ... ... ...
See Template:OEIS2C and Template:OEIS2C. Template:OEIS2C (n) / Template:OEIS2C (n + 1) are the second (fractional) Euler numbers and an autosequence of the second kind.
- (Template:OEIS2C (n + 2)/Template:OEIS2C (n + 2) = 1/6, 0, −1/30, 0, 1/42, ...) × ( 2n + 3 − 2/n + 2 = 3, 14/3, 15/2, 62/5, 21, ...) = Template:OEIS2C (n + 1)/Template:OEIS2C (n + 2) = 1/2, 0, −1/4, 0, 1/2, ....
Also valuable for Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C (see Connection with Worpitzky numbers).
Connection with Pascal's triangle
There are formulas connecting Pascal's triangle to Bernoulli numbers[lower-alpha 1]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{+}_n=\frac{|A_n|}{(n+1)!}~~~} with row-column definitions Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle [A_n]_{i, k} := \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } k>1+i \\ {i+1 \choose k-1} & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} }
where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle |A_n|} is the determinant of a n-by-n Hessenberg matrix part of Pascal's triangle
Example:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{+}_6 =\frac{\begin{vmatrix} 1& 2& 0& 0& 0& 0\\ 1& 3& 3& 0& 0& 0\\ 1& 4& 6& 4& 0& 0\\ 1& 5& 10& 10& 5& 0\\ 1& 6& 15& 20& 15& 6\\ 1& 7& 21& 35& 35& 21 \end{vmatrix}}{7!}=\frac{120}{5040}=\frac 1 {42} } [37]
Connection with Eulerian numbers
There are formulas connecting Eulerian numbers ⟨n
m⟩ to Bernoulli numbers:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \sum_{m=0}^n (-1)^m \left \langle {n\atop m} \right \rangle &= 2^{n+1} (2^{n+1}-1) \frac{B_{n+1}}{n+1}, \\ \sum_{m=0}^n (-1)^m \left \langle {n\atop m} \right \rangle \binom{n}{m}^{-1} &= (n+1) B_n. \end{align}}
Both formulae are valid for n ≥ 0 if B1 is set to 1/2. If B1 is set to −1/2 they are valid only for n ≥ 1 and n ≥ 2 respectively.
A binary tree representation
The Stirling polynomials σn(x) are related to the Bernoulli numbers by Bn = n!σn(1). S. C. Woon described an algorithm to compute σn(1) as a binary tree:[38]
Woon's recursive algorithm (for n ≥ 1) starts by assigning to the root node N = [1,2]. Given a node N = [a1, a2, ..., ak] of the tree, the left child of the node is L(N) = [−a1, a2 + 1, a3, ..., ak] and the right child R(N) = [a1, 2, a2, ..., ak]. A node N = [a1, a2, ..., ak] is written as ±[a2, ..., ak] in the initial part of the tree represented above with ± denoting the sign of a1.
Given a node N the factorial of N is defined as
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle N! = a_1 \prod_{k=2}^{\operatorname{length}(N)} a_k!. }
Restricted to the nodes N of a fixed tree-level n the sum of 1/N! is σn(1), thus
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_n = \sum_\stackrel{N \text{ node of}}{\text{ tree-level } n} \frac{n!}{N!}. }
For example:
- B1 = 1!(1/2!)
- B2 = 2!(−1/3! + 1/2!2!)
- B3 = 3!(1/4! − 1/2!3! − 1/3!2! + 1/2!2!2!)
Integral representation and continuation
The integral
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle b(s) = 2e^{s i \pi/2}\int_0^\infty \frac{st^s}{1-e^{2\pi t}} \frac{dt}{t} = \frac{s!}{2^{s-1}}\frac{\zeta(s)}{{ }\pi^s{ }}(-i)^s= \frac{2s!\zeta(s)}{(2\pi i)^s}}
has as special values b(2n) = B2n for n > 0.
For example, b(3) = 3/2ζ(3)π−3i and b(5) = −15/2ζ(5)π−5i. Here, ζ is the Riemann zeta function, and i is the imaginary unit. Leonhard Euler (Opera Omnia, Ser. 1, Vol. 10, p. 351) considered these numbers and calculated
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} p &= \frac{3}{2\pi^3}\left(1+\frac{1}{2^3}+\frac{1}{3^3}+\cdots \right) = 0.0581522\ldots \\ q &= \frac{15}{2\pi^5}\left(1+\frac{1}{2^5}+\frac{1}{3^5}+\cdots \right) = 0.0254132\ldots \end{align}}
Another similar integral representation is
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle b(s) = -\frac{e^{s i \pi/2}}{2^{s}-1}\int_0^\infty \frac{st^{s}}{\sinh\pi t} \frac{dt}{t}= \frac{2e^{s i \pi/2}}{2^{s}-1}\int_0^\infty \frac{e^{\pi t}st^s}{1-e^{2\pi t}} \frac{dt}{t}. }
The relation to the Euler numbers and π
The Euler numbers are a sequence of integers intimately connected with the Bernoulli numbers. Comparing the asymptotic expansions of the Bernoulli and the Euler numbers shows that the Euler numbers E2n are in magnitude approximately 2/π(42n − 22n) times larger than the Bernoulli numbers B2n. In consequence:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \pi \sim 2 (2^{2n} - 4^{2n}) \frac{B_{2n}}{E_{2n}}. }
This asymptotic equation reveals that π lies in the common root of both the Bernoulli and the Euler numbers. In fact π could be computed from these rational approximations.
Bernoulli numbers can be expressed through the Euler numbers and vice versa. Since, for odd n, Bn = En = 0 (with the exception B1), it suffices to consider the case when n is even.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} B_n &= \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\binom{n-1}{k} \frac{n}{4^n-2^n}E_k & n&=2, 4, 6, \ldots \\[6pt] E_n &= \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{n}{k-1} \frac{2^k-4^k}{k} B_k & n&=2,4,6,\ldots \end{align}}
These conversion formulas express a connection between the Bernoulli and the Euler numbers. But more important, there is a deep arithmetic root common to both kinds of numbers, which can be expressed through a more fundamental sequence of numbers, also closely tied to π. These numbers are defined for n ≥ 1 as[39][40]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S_n = 2 \left(\frac{2}{\pi}\right)^n \sum_{k = 0}^\infty \frac{ (-1)^{kn} }{(2k+1)^n} = 2 \left(\frac{2}{\pi}\right)^n \lim_{K\to \infty} \sum_{k = -K}^K (4k+1)^{-n}. }
The magic of these numbers lies in the fact that they turn out to be rational numbers. This was first proved by Leonhard Euler in a landmark paper De summis serierum reciprocarum (On the sums of series of reciprocals) and has fascinated mathematicians ever since.[41] The first few of these numbers are
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S_n = 1,1,\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3},\frac{5}{24}, \frac{2}{15},\frac{61}{720},\frac{17}{315},\frac{277}{8064},\frac{62}{2835},\ldots } (Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C)
These are the coefficients in the expansion of sec x + tan x.
The Bernoulli numbers and Euler numbers can be understood as special views of these numbers, selected from the sequence Sn and scaled for use in special applications.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} B_{n} &= (-1)^{\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor} [ n \text{ even}] \frac{n! }{2^n - 4^n}\, S_{n}\ , & n&= 2, 3, \ldots \\ E_n &= (-1)^{\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor} [ n \text{ even}] n! \, S_{n+1} & n &= 0, 1, \ldots \end{align}}
The expression [n even] has the value 1 if n is even and 0 otherwise (Iverson bracket).
These identities show that the quotient of Bernoulli and Euler numbers at the beginning of this section is just the special case of Rn = 2Sn/Sn + 1 when n is even. The Rn are rational approximations to π and two successive terms always enclose the true value of π. Beginning with n = 1 the sequence starts (Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C):
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 2, 4, 3, \frac{16}{5}, \frac{25}{8}, \frac{192}{61}, \frac{427}{136}, \frac{4352}{1385}, \frac{12465}{3968}, \frac{158720}{50521},\ldots \quad \longrightarrow \pi. }
These rational numbers also appear in the last paragraph of Euler's paper cited above.
Consider the Akiyama–Tanigawa transform for the sequence Template:OEIS2C (n + 2) / Template:OEIS2C (n + 1):
0 1 1/2 0 −1/4 −1/4 −1/8 0 1 1/2 1 3/4 0 −5/8 −3/4 2 −1/2 1/2 9/4 5/2 5/8 3 −1 −7/2 −3/4 15/2 4 5/2 −11/2 −99/4 5 8 77/2 6 −61/2
From the second, the numerators of the first column are the denominators of Euler's formula. The first column is −1/2 × Template:OEIS2C.
An algorithmic view: the Seidel triangle
The sequence Sn has another unexpected yet important property: The denominators of Sn+1 divide the factorial n!. In other words: the numbers Tn = Sn + 1 n!, sometimes called Euler zigzag numbers, are integers.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle T_n = 1,\,1,\,1,\,2,\,5,\,16,\,61,\,272,\,1385,\,7936,\,50521,\,353792,\ldots \quad n=0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots } (Template:OEIS2C). See (Template:OEIS2C).
Their exponential generating function is the sum of the secant and tangent functions.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^\infty T_n \frac{x^n}{n!} = \tan \left(\frac\pi4 + \frac x2\right) = \sec x + \tan x} .
Thus the above representations of the Bernoulli and Euler numbers can be rewritten in terms of this sequence as
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} B_n &= (-1)^{\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor} [n\text{ even}] \frac{n }{2^n-4^n}\, T_{n-1}\ & n &\geq 2 \\ E_n &= (-1)^{\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor} [n\text{ even}] T_{n} & n &\geq 0 \end{align}}
These identities make it easy to compute the Bernoulli and Euler numbers: the Euler numbers E2n are given immediately by T2n and the Bernoulli numbers B2n are fractions obtained from T2n - 1 by some easy shifting, avoiding rational arithmetic.
What remains is to find a convenient way to compute the numbers Tn. However, already in 1877 Philipp Ludwig von Seidel published an ingenious algorithm, which makes it simple to calculate Tn.[42]
- Start by putting 1 in row 0 and let k denote the number of the row currently being filled
- If k is odd, then put the number on the left end of the row k − 1 in the first position of the row k, and fill the row from the left to the right, with every entry being the sum of the number to the left and the number to the upper
- At the end of the row duplicate the last number.
- If k is even, proceed similar in the other direction.
Seidel's algorithm is in fact much more general (see the exposition of Dominique Dumont [43]) and was rediscovered several times thereafter.
Similar to Seidel's approach D. E. Knuth and T. J. Buckholtz gave a recurrence equation for the numbers T2n and recommended this method for computing B2n and E2n 'on electronic computers using only simple operations on integers'.[23]
V. I. Arnold[44] rediscovered Seidel's algorithm and later Millar, Sloane and Young popularized Seidel's algorithm under the name boustrophedon transform.
Triangular form:
1 1 1 2 2 1 2 4 5 5 16 16 14 10 5 16 32 46 56 61 61 272 272 256 224 178 122 61
Only Template:OEIS2C, with one 1, and Template:OEIS2C, with two 1s, are in the OEIS.
Distribution with a supplementary 1 and one 0 in the following rows:
1 0 1 −1 −1 0 0 −1 −2 −2 5 5 4 2 0 0 5 10 14 16 16 −61 −61 −56 −46 −32 −16 0
This is Template:OEIS2C, a signed version of Template:OEIS2C. The main andiagonal is Template:OEIS2C. The main diagonal is Template:OEIS2C. The central column is Template:OEIS2C. Row sums: 1, 1, −2, −5, 16, 61.... See Template:OEIS2C. See the array beginning with 1, 1, 0, −2, 0, 16, 0 below.
The Akiyama–Tanigawa algorithm applied to Template:OEIS2C (n + 1) / Template:OEIS2C(n) yields:
1 1 1/2 0 −1/4 −1/4 −1/8 0 1 3/2 1 0 −3/4 −1 −1 3/2 4 15/4 0 −5 −15/2 1 5 5 −51/2 0 61 −61
1. The first column is Template:OEIS2C. Its binomial transform leads to:
1 1 0 −2 0 16 0 0 −1 −2 2 16 −16 −1 −1 4 14 −32 0 5 10 −46 5 5 −56 0 −61 −61
The first row of this array is Template:OEIS2C. The absolute values of the increasing antidiagonals are Template:OEIS2C. The sum of the antidiagonals is −Template:OEIS2C (n + 1).
2. The second column is 1 1 −1 −5 5 61 −61 −1385 1385.... Its binomial transform yields:
1 2 2 −4 −16 32 272 1 0 −6 −12 48 240 −1 −6 −6 60 192 −5 0 66 32 5 66 66 61 0 −61
The first row of this array is 1 2 2 −4 −16 32 272 544 −7936 15872 353792 −707584.... The absolute values of the second bisection are the double of the absolute values of the first bisection.
Consider the Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm applied to Template:OEIS2C (n) / (Template:OEIS2C (n + 1) = abs(Template:OEIS2C (n)) + 1 = 1, 2, 2, 3/2, 1, 3/4, 3/4, 7/8, 1, 17/16, 17/16, 33/32....
1 2 2 3/2 1 3/4 3/4 −1 0 3/2 2 5/4 0 −1 −3 −3/2 3 25/4 2 −3 −27/2 −13 5 21 −3/2 −16 45 −61
The first column whose the absolute values are Template:OEIS2C could be the numerator of a trigonometric function.
Template:OEIS2C is an autosequence of the first kind (the main diagonal is Template:OEIS2C). The corresponding array is:
0 −1 −1 2 5 −16 −61 −1 0 3 3 −21 −45 1 3 0 −24 −24 2 −3 −24 0 −5 −21 24 −16 45 −61
The first two upper diagonals are −1 3 −24 402... = (−1)n + 1 × Template:OEIS2C. The sum of the antidiagonals is 0 −2 0 10... = 2 × Template:OEIS2C(n + 1).
−Template:OEIS2C is an autosequence of the second kind, like for instance Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C. Hence the array:
2 1 −1 −2 5 16 −61 −1 −2 −1 7 11 −77 −1 1 8 4 −88 2 7 −4 −92 5 −11 −88 −16 −77 −61
The main diagonal, here 2 −2 8 −92..., is the double of the first upper one, here Template:OEIS2C. The sum of the antidiagonals is 2 0 −4 0... = 2 × Template:OEIS2C(n + 1). Template:OEIS2C − Template:OEIS2C = 2 × Template:OEIS2C.
A combinatorial view: alternating permutations
Around 1880, three years after the publication of Seidel's algorithm, Désiré André proved a now classic result of combinatorial analysis.[45][46] Looking at the first terms of the Taylor expansion of the trigonometric functions tan x and sec x André made a startling discovery.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \tan x &= x + \frac{2x^3}{3!} + \frac{16x^5}{5!} + \frac{272x^7}{7!} + \frac{7936x^9}{9!} + \cdots\\[6pt] \sec x &= 1 + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{5x^4}{4!} + \frac{61x^6}{6!} + \frac{1385x^8}{8!} + \frac{50521x^{10}}{10!} + \cdots \end{align}}
The coefficients are the Euler zigzag numbers of odd and even index, respectively. In consequence the ordinary expansion of tan x + sec x has as coefficients the rational numbers Sn.
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \tan x + \sec x = 1 + x + \tfrac{1}{2}x^2 + \tfrac{1}{3}x^3 + \tfrac{5}{24}x^4 + \tfrac{2}{15}x^5 + \tfrac{61}{720}x^6 + \cdots }
André then succeeded by means of a recurrence argument to show that the alternating permutations of odd size are enumerated by the Euler numbers of odd index (also called tangent numbers) and the alternating permutations of even size by the Euler numbers of even index (also called secant numbers).
Related sequences
The arithmetic mean of the first and the second Bernoulli numbers are the associate Bernoulli numbers: B0 = 1, B1 = 0, B2 = 1/6, B3 = 0, B4 = −1/30, Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C. Via the second row of its inverse Akiyama–Tanigawa transform Template:OEIS2C, they lead to Balmer series Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C.
The Akiyama–Tanigawa algorithm applied to Template:OEIS2C (n + 4) / Template:OEIS2C (n) leads to the Bernoulli numbers Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C, Template:OEIS2C / Template:OEIS2C, or Template:OEIS2C Template:OEIS2C without B1, named intrinsic Bernoulli numbers Bi(n).
1 5/6 3/4 7/10 2/3 1/6 1/6 3/20 2/15 5/42 0 1/30 1/20 2/35 5/84 −1/30 −1/30 −3/140 −1/105 0 0 −1/42 −1/28 −4/105 −1/28
Hence another link between the intrinsic Bernoulli numbers and the Balmer series via Template:OEIS2C (n).
Template:OEIS2C (n − 2) = 0, 2, 1, 6,... is a permutation of the non-negative numbers.
The terms of the first row are f(n) = 1/2 + 1/n + 2. 2, f(n) is an autosequence of the second kind. 3/2, f(n) leads by its inverse binomial transform to 3/2 −1/2 1/3 −1/4 1/5 ... = 1/2 + log 2.
Consider g(n) = 1/2 – 1 / (n+2) = 0, 1/6, 1/4, 3/10, 1/3. The Akiyama-Tanagiwa transforms gives:
0 1/6 1/4 3/10 1/3 5/14 ... −1/6 −1/6 −3/20 −2/15 −5/42 −3/28 ... 0 −1/30 −1/20 −2/35 −5/84 −5/84 ... 1/30 1/30 3/140 1/105 0 −1/140 ...
0, g(n), is an autosequence of the second kind.
Euler Template:OEIS2C (n) / Template:OEIS2C (n + 1) without the second term (1/2) are the fractional intrinsic Euler numbers Ei(n) = 1, 0, −1/4, 0, 1/2, 0, −17/8, 0, ... The corresponding Akiyama transform is:
1 1 7/8 3/4 21/32 0 1/4 3/8 3/8 5/16 −1/4 −1/4 0 1/4 25/64 0 −1/2 −3/4 −9/16 −5/32 1/2 1/2 −9/16 −13/8 −125/64
The first line is Eu(n). Eu(n) preceded by a zero is an autosequence of the first kind. It is linked to the Oresme numbers. The numerators of the second line are Template:OEIS2C preceded by 0. The difference table is:
0 1 1 7/8 3/4 21/32 19/32 1 0 −1/8 −1/8 −3/32 −1/16 −5/128 −1 −1/8 0 1/32 1/32 3/128 1/64
Arithmetical properties of the Bernoulli numbers
The Bernoulli numbers can be expressed in terms of the Riemann zeta function as Bn = −nζ(1 − n) for integers n ≥ 0 provided for n = 0 the expression −nζ(1 − n) is understood as the limiting value and the convention B1 = 1/2 is used. This intimately relates them to the values of the zeta function at negative integers. As such, they could be expected to have and do have deep arithmetical properties. For example, the Agoh–Giuga conjecture postulates that p is a prime number if and only if pBp − 1 is congruent to −1 modulo p. Divisibility properties of the Bernoulli numbers are related to the ideal class groups of cyclotomic fields by a theorem of Kummer and its strengthening in the Herbrand-Ribet theorem, and to class numbers of real quadratic fields by Ankeny–Artin–Chowla.
The Kummer theorems
The Bernoulli numbers are related to Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) by Kummer's theorem,[47] which says:
- If the odd prime p does not divide any of the numerators of the Bernoulli numbers B2, B4, ..., Bp − 3 then xp + yp + zp = 0 has no solutions in nonzero integers.
Prime numbers with this property are called regular primes. Another classical result of Kummer are the following congruences.[48]
- Let p be an odd prime and b an even number such that p − 1 does not divide b. Then for any non-negative integer k
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{B_{k(p-1)+b}}{k(p-1)+b} \equiv \frac{B_{b}}{b} \pmod{p}. }
A generalization of these congruences goes by the name of p-adic continuity.
p-adic continuity
If b, m and n are positive integers such that m and n are not divisible by p − 1 and m ≡ n (mod pb − 1 (p − 1)), then
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (1-p^{m-1})\frac{B_m}{m} \equiv (1-p^{n-1})\frac{B_n} n \pmod{p^b}.}
Since Bn = −nζ(1 − n), this can also be written
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left(1-p^{-u}\right)\zeta(u) \equiv \left(1-p^{-v}\right)\zeta(v) \pmod{p^b},}
where u = 1 − m and v = 1 − n, so that u and v are nonpositive and not congruent to 1 modulo p − 1. This tells us that the Riemann zeta function, with 1 − p−s taken out of the Euler product formula, is continuous in the p-adic numbers on odd negative integers congruent modulo p − 1 to a particular a ≢ 1 mod (p − 1), and so can be extended to a continuous function ζp(s) for all p-adic integers Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}_p,} the p-adic zeta function.
Ramanujan's congruences
The following relations, due to Ramanujan, provide a method for calculating Bernoulli numbers that is more efficient than the one given by their original recursive definition:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \binom{m+3}{m} B_m=\begin{cases} \frac{m+3}{3}-\sum\limits_{j=1}^\frac{m}{6}\binom{m+3}{m-6j}B_{m-6j}, & \text{if } m\equiv 0\pmod 6;\\ \frac{m+3}{3}-\sum\limits_{j=1}^\frac{m-2}{6}\binom{m+3}{m-6j}B_{m-6j}, & \text{if } m\equiv 2\pmod 6;\\ -\frac{m+3}{6}-\sum\limits_{j=1}^\frac{m-4}{6}\binom{m+3}{m-6j}B_{m-6j}, & \text{if } m\equiv 4\pmod 6.\end{cases}}
Von Staudt–Clausen theorem
The von Staudt–Clausen theorem was given by Karl Georg Christian von Staudt[49] and Thomas Clausen[50] independently in 1840. The theorem states that for every n > 0,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_{2n} + \sum_{(p-1)\,\mid\,2n} \frac1p}
is an integer. The sum extends over all primes p for which p − 1 divides 2n.
A consequence of this is that the denominator of B2n is given by the product of all primes p for which p − 1 divides 2n. In particular, these denominators are square-free and divisible by 6.
Why do the odd Bernoulli numbers vanish?
The sum
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \varphi_k(n) = \sum_{i=0}^n i^k - \frac{n^k} 2}
can be evaluated for negative values of the index n. Doing so will show that it is an odd function for even values of k, which implies that the sum has only terms of odd index. This and the formula for the Bernoulli sum imply that B2k + 1 − m is 0 for m even and 2k + 1 − m > 1; and that the term for B1 is cancelled by the subtraction. The von Staudt–Clausen theorem combined with Worpitzky's representation also gives a combinatorial answer to this question (valid for n > 1).
From the von Staudt–Clausen theorem it is known that for odd n > 1 the number 2Bn is an integer. This seems trivial if one knows beforehand that the integer in question is zero. However, by applying Worpitzky's representation one gets
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 2B_n =\sum_{m=0}^n (-1)^m \frac{2}{m+1}m! \left\{{n+1\atop m+1} \right\} = 0\quad(n>1 \text{ is odd})}
as a sum of integers, which is not trivial. Here a combinatorial fact comes to surface which explains the vanishing of the Bernoulli numbers at odd index. Let Sn,m be the number of surjective maps from {1, 2, ..., n} to {1, 2, ..., m}, then Sn,m = m!{n
m}. The last equation can only hold if
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{\text{odd }m=1}^{n-1} \frac 2 {m^2}S_{n,m}=\sum_{\text{even } m=2}^n \frac{2}{m^2} S_{n,m} \quad (n>2 \text{ is even}). }
This equation can be proved by induction. The first two examples of this equation are
- n = 4: 2 + 8 = 7 + 3,
- n = 6: 2 + 120 + 144 = 31 + 195 + 40.
Thus the Bernoulli numbers vanish at odd index because some non-obvious combinatorial identities are embodied in the Bernoulli numbers.
A restatement of the Riemann hypothesis
The connection between the Bernoulli numbers and the Riemann zeta function is strong enough to provide an alternate formulation of the Riemann hypothesis (RH) which uses only the Bernoulli numbers. In fact Marcel Riesz proved that the RH is equivalent to the following assertion:[51]
- For every ε > 1/4 there exists a constant Cε > 0 (depending on ε) such that |R(x)| < Cεxε as x → ∞.
Here R(x) is the Riesz function
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle R(x) = 2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{k^{\overline{k}} x^{k}}{(2\pi)^{2k}\left(\frac{B_{2k}}{2k}\right)} = 2\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{k^{\overline{k}}x^k}{(2\pi)^{2k}\beta_{2k}}. }
nk denotes the rising factorial power in the notation of D. E. Knuth. The numbers βn = Bn/n occur frequently in the study of the zeta function and are significant because βn is a p-integer for primes p where p − 1 does not divide n. The βn are called divided Bernoulli numbers.
Generalized Bernoulli numbers
The generalized Bernoulli numbers are certain algebraic numbers, defined similarly to the Bernoulli numbers, that are related to special values of Dirichlet L-functions in the same way that Bernoulli numbers are related to special values of the Riemann zeta function.
Let χ be a Dirichlet character modulo f. The generalized Bernoulli numbers attached to χ are defined by
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{a=1}^f \chi(a) \frac{te^{at}}{e^{ft}-1} = \sum_{k=0}^\infty B_{k,\chi}\frac{t^k}{k!}.}
Apart from the exceptional B1,1 = 1/2, we have, for any Dirichlet character χ, that Bk,χ = 0 if χ(−1) ≠ (−1)k.
Generalizing the relation between Bernoulli numbers and values of the Riemann zeta function at non-positive integers, one has the for all integers k ≥ 1:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle L(1-k,\chi)=-\frac{B_{k,\chi}}k,}
where L(s,χ) is the Dirichlet L-function of χ.[52]
Eisenstein–Kronecker number
Eisenstein–Kronecker numbers are an analogue of the generalized Bernoulli numbers for imaginary quadratic fields.[53][54] They are related to critical L-values of Hecke characters.[54]
Appendix
Assorted identities
- Umbral calculus gives a compact form of Bernoulli's formula, by using an abstract symbol B,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S_m(n) = \frac 1 {m+1} ((\mathbf{B} + n)^{m+1} - B_{m+1}), }
where the symbol Bk that appears during binomial expansion of the parenthesized term is to be replaced by the Bernoulli number Bk (and B1 = +1/2). More suggestively and mnemonically, this may be written as
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S_m(n) = \int_0^n (\mathbf{B}+x)^m\,dx. }
Other Bernoulli identities can be written compactly with this symbol. For example,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (1-2\mathbf{B})^m = (2-2^m) B_m. }
- Let n be non-negative and even. Then
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \zeta(n) = \frac{(-1)^{\frac{n}{2} - 1} B_n (2\pi)^n}{2(n!)}. }
- The nth cumulant of the uniform probability distribution on the interval [−1, 0] is Bn/n.
- For n ≥ 1, Bn is given by the determinant of an (n + 1) × (n + 1) matrix.[55] Namely,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_n = n! \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 1 \\ \frac{1}{2!} & 1 & \cdots & 0 & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots \\ \frac{1}{n!} & \frac{1}{(n-1)!} & \cdots & 1 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{(n+1)!} & \frac{1}{n!} & \cdots & \frac{1}{2!} & 0 \end{vmatrix}. }
- The even-numbered Bernoulli number B2n is given by the determinant of an (n + 1) × (n + 1) matrix.[55] Namely,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_{2n} = -\frac{(2n)!}{2^{2n} - 2} \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 1 \\ \frac{1}{3!} & 1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{5!} & \frac{1}{3!} & 1 & \cdots & 0 & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots& \vdots \\ \frac{1}{(2n+1)!} & \frac{1}{(2n-1)!} & \frac{1}{(2n-3)!} &\cdots & \frac{1}{3!} & 0 \end{vmatrix}. }
- Let n ≥ 1. Then[56]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{n}{k}B_k B_{n-k}+B_{n-1}=-B_n. }
- Let n ≥ 1. Then[57]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n+1}k (n+k+1)B_{n+k}=0. }
- Let n ≥ 0. Then (Leopold Kronecker 1883)
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B_n = - \sum_{k=1}^{n+1} \frac{(-1)^k}{k} \binom{n+1}{k} \sum_{j=1}^k j^n. }
- Let n ≥ 1 and m ≥ 1. Then[58]
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (-1)^m \sum_{r=0}^m \binom{m}{r} B_{n+r}=(-1)^n \sum_{s=0}^n \binom{n}{s} B_{m+s}. }
- Let n ≥ 4 and Hn denote the nth harmonic number, that is,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle H_n=\sum_{k=1}^n k^{-1}. }
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{n}{2}\sum_{k=2}^{n-2}\frac{B_{n-k}}{n-k}\frac{B_k}{k} - \sum_{k=2}^{n-2} \binom{n}{k}\frac{B_{n-k}}{n-k} B_k =H_n B_n. }
- Let n ≥ 4. Then (Yuri Matiyasevich 1997)
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (n+2)\sum_{k=2}^{n-2}B_k B_{n-k}-2\sum_{l=2}^{n-2}\binom{n+2}{l} B_l B_{n-l}=n(n+1)B_n. }
- The Faber–Pandharipande–Zagier–Gessel identity states that for n ≥ 1,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{n}{2}\left(B_{n-1}(x)+\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}\frac{B_{k}(x)}{k} \frac{B_{n-k}(x)}{n-k}\right) -\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\binom{n}{k}\frac{B_{n-k}} {n-k} B_k(x) =H_{n-1}B_n(x).}
- For n ≥ 0 if B1 = 1/2, or n ≥ 1 if B1 = −1/2,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} \frac{B_k}{n-k+2} = \frac{B_{n+1}}{n+1}. }
- Let n ≥ 0. Then
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle -1 + \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} \frac{2^{n-k+1}}{n-k+1}B_k(1) = 2^n }
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle -1 + \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} \frac{2^{n-k+1}}{n-k+1}B_{k}(0) = \delta_{n,0}. }
- A reciprocity relation of M. B. Gelfand[59] states that
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (-1)^{m+1} \sum_{j=0}^k \binom{k}{j} \frac{B_{m+1+j}}{m+1+j} + (-1)^{k+1} \sum_{j=0}^m \binom{m}{j}\frac{B_{k+1+j}}{k+1+j} = \frac{k!m!}{(k+m+1)!}. }
See also
Notes
- ↑ this formula was discovered (or perhaps rediscovered) by Giorgio Pietrocola. His demonstration is available in Italian language (Pietrocola 2008).
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Template:Mathworld
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Selin, Helaine, ed. (1997), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, Springer, p. 819 (p. 891), Bibcode:2008ehst.book.....S, ISBN 0-7923-4066-3
- ↑ Smith, David Eugene; Mikami, Yoshio (1914), A history of Japanese mathematics, Open Court publishing company, p. 108; reprinted, Dover Publications, 2005, ISBN 9780486434827
- ↑ Kitagawa, Tomoko L. (2021-07-23), "The Origin of the Bernoulli Numbers: Mathematics in Basel and Edo in the Early Eighteenth Century", The Mathematical Intelligencer, 44: 46–56, doi:10.1007/s00283-021-10072-y, ISSN 0343-6993
- ↑ Menabrea, L.F. (1842), "Sketch of the Analytic Engine invented by Charles Babbage, with notes upon the Memoir by the Translator Ada Augusta, Countess of Lovelace", Bibliothèque Universelle de Genève, 82, See Note G
- ↑ Arfken (1970), p. 278.
- ↑ Donald Knuth (2022), Recent News (2022): Concrete Mathematics and Bernoulli.
But last year I took a close look at Peter Luschny's Bernoulli manifesto, where he gives more than a dozen good reasons why the value of $B_1$ should really be plus one-half. He explains that some mathematicians of the early 20th century had unilaterally changed the conventions, because some of their formulas came out a bit nicer when the negative value was used. It was their well-intentioned but ultimately poor choice that had led to what I'd been taught in the 1950s. […] By now, hundreds of books that use the “minus-one-half” convention have unfortunately been written. Even worse, all the major software systems for symbolic mathematics have that 20th-century aberration deeply embedded. Yet Luschny convinced me that we have all been wrong, and that it's high time to change back to the correct definition before the situation gets even worse.
- ↑ Peter Luschny (2013), The Bernoulli Manifesto
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Knuth (1993).
- ↑ Jacobi, C.G.J. (1834), "De usu legitimo formulae summatoriae Maclaurinianae", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 12: 263–272
- ↑ Knuth (1993), p. 14.
- ↑ Bernoulli, Jacob (1713). Ars Conjectandi (in Latin). Basel: Impensis Thurnisiorum, Fratrum. pp. 97–98. doi:10.5479/sil.262971.39088000323931.
- ↑ Miller, Jeff (23 June 2017), Earliest Uses of Symbols of Calculus, retrieved 2026-01-03
- ↑ Graham, Knuth & Patashnik (1989), Section 2.51.
- ↑ Jordan (1950) p 233
- ↑ Ireland and Rosen (1990) p 229
- ↑ Saalschütz, Louis (1893), Vorlesungen über die Bernoullischen Zahlen, ihren Zusammenhang mit den Secanten-Coefficienten und ihre wichtigeren Anwendungen, Berlin: Julius Springer.
- ↑ Arfken (1970), p. 279.
- ↑ Akiyama, Shigeki; Tanigawa, Yoshio (1 December 2001). "Multiple Zeta Values at Non-Positive Integers" (PDF). The Ramanujan Journal. 5 (4): 327–351. doi:10.1023/A:1013981102941. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
- ↑ Kaneko, Masanobu (12 December 2000). "The Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm for Bernoulli numbers" (PDF). Journal of Integer Sequences. 3 (1). Retrieved 11 February 2026.
- ↑ Kawasaki, Naho; Ohno, Yasuo (12 June 2023). "The Triangle Algorithm for Bernoulli Polynomials" (PDF). Integers. 23. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8028914. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
- ↑ Brent, Richard P.; Harvey, David (2013). "Fast Computation of Bernoulli, Tangent and Secant Numbers". Computational and Analytical Mathematics. 50: 127–142. arXiv:1108.0286. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7621-4_8. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Knuth, D. E.; Buckholtz, T. J. (1967), "Computation of Tangent, Euler, and Bernoulli Numbers", Mathematics of Computation, American Mathematical Society, 21 (100): 663–688, doi:10.2307/2005010, JSTOR 2005010
- ↑ Buhler, J.; Crandall, R.; Ernvall, R.; Metsankyla, T.; Shokrollahi, M. (2001), "Irregular Primes and Cyclotomic Invariants to 12 Million", Journal of Symbolic Computation, 31 (1–2): 89–96, doi:10.1006/jsco.1999.1011
- ↑ Harvey, David (2010), "A multimodular algorithm for computing Bernoulli numbers", Math. Comput., 79 (272): 2361–2370, arXiv:0807.1347, doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-2010-02367-1, S2CID 11329343, Zbl 1215.11016
- ↑ Kellner, Bernd (2002), Program Calcbn – A program for calculating Bernoulli numbers.
- ↑ Pavlyk, Oleksandr (29 April 2008), "Today We Broke the Bernoulli Record: From the Analytical Engine to Mathematica", Wolfram News.
- ↑ Graham, Knuth & Patashnik (1989), 9.67.
- ↑ Graham, Knuth & Patashnik (1989), 2.44, 2.52.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
- ↑ Arfken (1970), p. 463.
- ↑ Comtet, L. (1974). Advanced combinatorics. The art of finite and infinite expansions (Revised and Enlarged ed.). Dordrecht-Boston: D. Reidel Publ.
- ↑ 33.0 33.1 Rademacher, H. (1973), Analytic Number Theory, New York City: Springer-Verlag.
- ↑ Boole, G. (1880), A treatise of the calculus of finite differences (3rd ed.), London: Macmillan.
- ↑ Gould, Henry W. (1972), "Explicit formulas for Bernoulli numbers", Amer. Math. Monthly, 79 (1): 44–51, doi:10.2307/2978125, JSTOR 2978125
- ↑ Apostol, Tom M. (2010), Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, Springer-Verlag, p. 197
- ↑ Pietrocola, Giorgio (2017), On polynomials for the calculation of sums of powers of successive integers and Bernoulli numbers deduced from the Pascal's triangle, Academia.edu.
- ↑ Woon, S. C. (1997), "A tree for generating Bernoulli numbers", Math. Mag., 70 (1): 51–56, doi:10.2307/2691054, JSTOR 2691054
- ↑ Stanley, Richard P. (2010), "A survey of alternating permutations", Combinatorics and graphs, Contemporary Mathematics, 531, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 165–196, arXiv:0912.4240, doi:10.1090/conm/531/10466, ISBN 978-0-8218-4865-4, MR 2757798, S2CID 14619581
- ↑ Elkies, N. D. (2003), "On the sums Sum_(k=-infinity...infinity) (4k+1)^(-n)", Amer. Math. Monthly, 110 (7): 561–573, arXiv:math.CA/0101168, doi:10.2307/3647742, JSTOR 3647742
- ↑ Euler, Leonhard (1735), "De summis serierum reciprocarum", Opera Omnia, I.14, E 41: 73–86, arXiv:math/0506415, Bibcode:2005math......6415E
- ↑ Seidel, L. (1877), "Über eine einfache Entstehungsweise der Bernoullischen Zahlen und einiger verwandten Reihen", Sitzungsber. Münch. Akad., 4: 157–187
- ↑ Dumont, D. (1981), "Matrices d'Euler-Seidel", Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire, B05c
- ↑ Arnold, V. I. (1991), "Bernoulli-Euler updown numbers associated with function singularities, their combinatorics and arithmetics", Duke Math. J., 63 (2): 537–555, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-91-06323-4
- ↑ André, D. (1879), "Développements de sec x et tan x", C. R. Acad. Sci., 88: 965–967
- ↑ André, D. (1881), "Mémoire sur les permutations alternées", Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 7: 167–184
- ↑ Kummer, E. E. (1850), "Allgemeiner Beweis des Fermat'schen Satzes, dass die Gleichung xλ + yλ = zλ durch ganze Zahlen unlösbar ist, für alle diejenigen Potenz-Exponenten λ, welche ungerade Primzahlen sind und in den Zählern der ersten (λ-3)/2 Bernoulli'schen Zahlen als Factoren nicht vorkommen", J. Reine Angew. Math., 40: 131–138
- ↑ Kummer, E. E. (1851), "Über eine allgemeine Eigenschaft der rationalen Entwicklungscoefficienten einer bestimmten Gattung analytischer Functionen", J. Reine Angew. Math., 1851 (41): 368–372
- ↑ von Staudt, K. G. Ch. (1840), "Beweis eines Lehrsatzes, die Bernoullischen Zahlen betreffend", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 21: 372–374
- ↑ Clausen, Thomas (1840), "Lehrsatz aus einer Abhandlung über die Bernoullischen Zahlen", Astron. Nachr., 17 (22): 351–352, doi:10.1002/asna.18400172205
- ↑ Riesz, M. (1916), "Sur l'hypothèse de Riemann", Acta Mathematica, 40: 185–90, doi:10.1007/BF02418544
- ↑ Template:Neukirch ANT §VII.2.
- ↑ Charollois, Pierre; Sczech, Robert (2016), "Elliptic Functions According to Eisenstein and Kronecker: An Update", EMS Newsletter, 2016–9 (101): 8–14, doi:10.4171/NEWS/101/4, ISSN 1027-488X, S2CID 54504376
- ↑ 54.0 54.1 Bannai, Kenichi; Kobayashi, Shinichi (2010), "Algebraic theta functions and the p-adic interpolation of Eisenstein-Kronecker numbers", Duke Mathematical Journal, 153 (2), arXiv:math/0610163, doi:10.1215/00127094-2010-024, ISSN 0012-7094, S2CID 9262012
- ↑ 55.0 55.1 Malenfant, Jerome (2011), "Finite, closed-form expressions for the partition function and for Euler, Bernoulli, and Stirling numbers", arXiv:1103.1585 [math.NT]
- ↑ Euler, E41, Inventio summae cuiusque seriei ex dato termino generali
- ↑ von Ettingshausen, A. (1827), Vorlesungen über die höhere Mathematik, 1, Vienna: Carl Gerold
- ↑ Carlitz, L. (1968), "Bernoulli Numbers", Fibonacci Quarterly, 6 (3): 71–85, doi:10.1080/00150517.1968.12431229
- ↑ Agoh, Takashi; Dilcher, Karl (2008), "Reciprocity Relations for Bernoulli Numbers", American Mathematical Monthly, 115 (3): 237–244, doi:10.1080/00029890.2008.11920520, JSTOR 27642447, S2CID 43614118
Bibliography
- Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I. A. (1972), "§23.1: Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials and the Euler-Maclaurin Formula", Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (9th printing ed.), New York: Dover Publications, pp. 804–806.
- Arfken, George (1970), Mathematical methods for physicists (2nd ed.), Academic Press, Bibcode:1970mmp..book.....A, ISBN 978-0120598519
- Arlettaz, D. (1998), "Die Bernoulli-Zahlen: eine Beziehung zwischen Topologie und Gruppentheorie", Math. Semesterber, 45: 61–75, doi:10.1007/s005910050037, S2CID 121753654.
- Ayoub, A. (1981), "Euler and the Zeta Function", Amer. Math. Monthly, 74 (2): 1067–1086, doi:10.2307/2319041, JSTOR 2319041.
- Conway, John; Guy, Richard (1996), The Book of Numbers, Springer-Verlag.
- Dilcher, K.; Skula, L.; Slavutskii, I. Sh. (1991), "Bernoulli numbers. Bibliography (1713–1990)", Queen's Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Kingston, Ontario (87).
- Dumont, D.; Viennot, G. (1980), "A combinatorial interpretation of Seidel generation of Genocchi numbers", Ann. Discrete Math., Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 6: 77–87, doi:10.1016/S0167-5060(08)70696-4, ISBN 978-0-444-86048-4.
- Entringer, R. C. (1966), "A combinatorial interpretation of the Euler and Bernoulli numbers", Nieuw. Arch. V. Wiskunde, 14: 241–6.
- Fee, G.; Plouffe, S. (2007), "An efficient algorithm for the computation of Bernoulli numbers", arXiv:math/0702300.
- Graham, R.; Knuth, D. E.; Patashnik, O. (1989), Concrete Mathematics (2nd ed.), Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-55802-5
- Ireland, Kenneth; Rosen, Michael (1990), A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97329-X
- Jordan, Charles (1950), Calculus of Finite Differences, New York: Chelsea Publ. Co..
- Kaneko, M. (2000), "The Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm for Bernoulli numbers", Journal of Integer Sequences, 12: 29, Bibcode:2000JIntS...3...29K.
- Knuth, D. E. (1993), "Johann Faulhaber and the Sums of Powers", Mathematics of Computation, American Mathematical Society, 61 (203): 277–294, arXiv:math/9207222, doi:10.2307/2152953, JSTOR 2152953
- Kouba, Omran (2016). "Lecture Notes, Bernoulli Polynomials and Applications". arXiv:1309.7560v2 [math.CA].
- Luschny, Peter (2007), An inclusion of the Bernoulli numbers.
- Luschny, Peter (8 October 2011), "TheLostBernoulliNumbers", OeisWiki, retrieved 11 May 2019.
- The Mathematics Genealogy Project, Fargo: Department of Mathematics, North Dakota State University, n.d., archived from the original on 10 May 2019, retrieved 11 May 2019.
- Milnor, John W.; Stasheff, James D. (1974), "Appendix B: Bernoulli Numbers", Characteristic Classes, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 76, Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press, pp. 281–287.
- Pietrocola, Giorgio (October 31, 2008), "Esplorando un antico sentiero: teoremi sulla somma di potenze di interi successivi (Corollario 2b)", Maecla (in Italian), retrieved April 8, 2017.
- Slavutskii, Ilya Sh. (1995), "Staudt and arithmetical properties of Bernoulli numbers", Historia Scientiarum, 2: 69–74.
- von Staudt, K. G. Ch. (1845), "De numeris Bernoullianis, commentationem alteram", Erlangen.
- Sun, Zhi-Wei (2005–2006), Some curious results on Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, archived from the original on 2001-10-31.
- Woon, S. C. (1998), "Generalization of a relation between the Riemann zeta function and Bernoulli numbers", arXiv:math.NT/9812143.
- Worpitzky, J. (1883), "Studien über die Bernoullischen und Eulerschen Zahlen", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 94: 203–232.
External links
- Template:SpringerEOM
- The first 498 Bernoulli Numbers from Project Gutenberg
- A multimodular algorithm for computing Bernoulli numbers
- The Bernoulli Number Page
- Bernoulli number programs at LiteratePrograms
- P. Luschny, The Computation of Irregular Primes
- P. Luschny, The Computation And Asymptotics Of Bernoulli Numbers
- Gottfried Helms, Bernoullinumbers in context of Pascal-(Binomial)matrix (PDF), archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09
- Gottfried Helms, summing of like powers in context with Pascal-/Bernoulli-matrix (PDF), archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09
- Gottfried Helms, Some special properties, sums of Bernoulli-and related numbers (PDF), archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09