Darwin Awards: Difference between revisions
imported>Pluxquba →Notable recipients: Remove unsourced entries |
imported>BalinKingOfMoria →History: Try to make sentence less confusing |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The '''Darwin Awards''' are a rhetorical [[tongue-in-cheek]] honor that originated in [[Usenet]] newsgroup discussions around 1985. They recognize individuals who have supposedly [[Culling|contributed to human evolution]] by [[natural selection|selecting]] themselves out of the [[gene pool]] by dying or becoming [[sterilization (medicine)|sterilized]] by their own actions. | The '''Darwin Awards''' are a rhetorical [[tongue-in-cheek]] honor that originated in [[Usenet]] newsgroup discussions around 1985. They recognize individuals who have supposedly [[Culling|contributed to human evolution]] by [[natural selection|selecting]] themselves out of the [[gene pool]] by dying or becoming [[sterilization (medicine)|sterilized]] by their own actions. | ||
The project became more formalized with the creation of a website in 1993, followed by a series of books starting in 2000 by Wendy Northcutt. The criterion for the awards states: "In the spirit of [[Charles Darwin]], the Darwin Awards commemorate individuals who protect our gene pool by making the ultimate sacrifice of their own lives. Darwin Award winners eliminate themselves in an extraordinarily idiotic manner, thereby improving our species' chances of long-term survival."<ref name="history_and_rules">{{cite web|last=Northcutt|first=Wendy|title=History & Rules|url=http://www.darwinawards.com/rules/rules1.html|publisher=darwinawards.com|access-date=August 14, 2012}}</ref> | The project became more formalized with the creation of a [https://darwinawards.com/ website] in 1993, followed by a series of books starting in 2000 by Wendy Northcutt. The criterion for the awards states: "In the spirit of [[Charles Darwin]], the Darwin Awards commemorate individuals who protect our gene pool by making the ultimate sacrifice of their own lives. Darwin Award winners eliminate themselves in an extraordinarily idiotic manner, thereby improving our species' chances of long-term survival."<ref name="history_and_rules">{{cite web|last=Northcutt|first=Wendy|title=History & Rules|url=http://www.darwinawards.com/rules/rules1.html|publisher=darwinawards.com|access-date=August 14, 2012}}</ref> | ||
Accidental self-sterilization also qualifies, but the site notes: "Of necessity, the award is usually bestowed posthumously." The candidate is disqualified, though, if "innocent bystanders" are killed in the process, as they might have contributed positively to the gene pool. The logical problem presented by award winners who may have had children is not addressed in the selection process owing to the difficulty of ascertaining a candidate's parental status; the Darwin Award rules state that the presence of offspring does not disqualify a nominee.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules.children.html|title=Darwin Awards: History and Rules|website=darwinawards.com|access-date=February 24, 2020}}</ref> | Accidental self-sterilization also qualifies, but the site notes: "Of necessity, the award is usually bestowed posthumously." The candidate is disqualified, though, if "innocent bystanders" are killed in the process, as they might have contributed positively to the gene pool. The logical problem presented by award winners who may have had children is not addressed in the selection process owing to the difficulty of ascertaining a candidate's parental status; the Darwin Award rules state that the presence of offspring does not disqualify a nominee.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules.children.html|title=Darwin Awards: History and Rules|website=darwinawards.com|access-date=February 24, 2020}}</ref> | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
[[File:Wendy Northcutt.jpg|thumb|Wendy Northcutt, author of the Darwin Awards website and books]] | |||
The origin of the Darwin Awards can be traced back to posts on [[Usenet]] group discussions as early as 1985. A post on August 7, 1985, describes the awards as being "given posthumously to people who have made the supreme sacrifice to keep their genes out of our pool. Style counts, not everyone who dies from their own stupidity can win."<ref name="Freeman_Andy">{{cite news|last=Freeman|first=Andy|title=Darwin Awards.|url=https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!msg/net.bizarre/V5o__gcmIf0/fZ5sv2BvzAsJ%5B1-25%5D|access-date=August 14, 2012|newspaper=[[Google groups]] archive of net.bizarre.|date=August 7, 1985}}</ref> This early post cites an example of a person who tried to break into a [[Death by vending machine|vending machine]] and was crushed to death when he pulled it over on himself.<ref name="Freeman_Andy" /> Another widely distributed early story mentioning the Darwin Awards is the [[JATO Rocket Car]], which describes a man who strapped a [[JATO|jet-assisted take-off]] unit to his [[Chevrolet Impala]] in the [[Arizona]] desert and who died on the side of a cliff as his car achieved speeds of {{convert|250|to|300|mph}} | The origin of the Darwin Awards can be traced back to posts on [[Usenet]] group discussions as early as 1985. A post on August 7, 1985, describes the awards as being "given posthumously to people who have made the supreme sacrifice to keep their genes out of our pool. Style counts, not everyone who dies from their own stupidity can win."<ref name="Freeman_Andy">{{cite news|last=Freeman|first=Andy|title=Darwin Awards.|url=https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!msg/net.bizarre/V5o__gcmIf0/fZ5sv2BvzAsJ%5B1-25%5D|access-date=August 14, 2012|newspaper=[[Google groups]] archive of net.bizarre.|date=August 7, 1985}}</ref> This early post cites an example of a person who tried to break into a [[Death by vending machine|vending machine]] and was crushed to death when he pulled it over on himself.<ref name="Freeman_Andy" /> Another widely distributed early story mentioning the Darwin Awards is the [[JATO Rocket Car]], which describes a man who strapped a [[JATO|jet-assisted take-off]] unit to his [[Chevrolet Impala]] in the [[Arizona]] desert and who died on the side of a cliff as his car achieved speeds of {{convert|250|to|300|mph}}; this story was later determined to be an urban legend by the [[Arizona Department of Public Safety]].<ref name="Mikkelson_Barbara">{{cite news|last=Mikkelson|first=Barbara|title=Carmageddon.|url=http://www.snopes.com/autos/dream/jato.asp|access-date=August 14, 2012|newspaper=[[Snopes]]|date=November 12, 2006}}</ref> Wendy Northcutt says the official Darwin Awards website run by Northcutt does its best to confirm all stories submitted, listing them as, "confirmed true by Darwin". Many of the [[viral email]]s circulating the Internet, however, are hoaxes and urban legends.<ref>{{Cite web|title=2003 Darwin Awards|url=https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/2003-darwin-awards/|access-date=2022-02-08|website=Snopes.com|date=May 4, 2006 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=2004 Darwin Awards|url=https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/2004-darwin-awards/|access-date=2022-02-08|website=Snopes.com|date=July 26, 2005 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=2005 Darwin Awards|url=https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/2005-darwin-awards/|access-date=2022-02-08|website=Snopes.com|date=August 7, 2005 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=2006 Darwin Awards|url=https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/2006-darwin-awards/|access-date=2022-02-08|website=Snopes.com|date=April 2, 2007 |language=en-US}}</ref> | ||
The website and collection of books were started in 1993 by Wendy Northcutt, who | The website and collection of books were started in 1993 by Wendy Northcutt, who studied [[molecular biology]] at the [[University of California, Berkeley]],<ref name="Hansen_Suzy" /> and [[neurobiology]] at [[Stanford University]], doing research on cancer and [[telomerase]]. In her spare time, she organized [[chain letter]]s from family members into the original Darwin Awards website hosted in her personal account space at Stanford. She eventually gave up practical research in 1998, and devoted herself full-time to her website and books in September 1999.<ref name="Hawkins_John">{{cite news |last=Hawkins |first=John |title=A Conversation with Darwin (Webmaster of the Darwin Awards). |url=http://www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/darwin.php |access-date=August 14, 2012 |newspaper=Right Wing News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120622054043/http://www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/darwin.php |archive-date=June 22, 2012 }}</ref> By 2002, the website received 7 million page hits per month.<ref name="Clark_Doug">{{cite news|last=Clark |first=Doug |title=Let's hear it for natural selection. |url=http://www.spokesmanreview.com/news-story.asp?date=111402&ID=s1253392 |access-date=September 18, 2012 |newspaper=[[The Spokesman-Review]] |date=November 14, 2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203052123/http://www.spokesmanreview.com/news-story.asp?date=111402&ID=s1253392 |archive-date=December 3, 2013 }}</ref> | ||
Northcutt encountered some difficulty in publishing the first book, since most publishers would only offer her a deal if she agreed to remove the stories from the Internet, but she refused: "It was a community! I could not do that. Even though it might have cost me a lot of money, I kept saying no." She eventually found a publisher who agreed to print a book containing only 10% of the material gathered for the website. The first book turned out to be a success, and was listed on ''[[The New York Times]]'' best-seller list for 6 months.<ref name="John_123reg">{{cite news |author=John |title=Pet porn, rocket cars and hand grenades. |url=http://www.123-reg.co.uk/blog/interviews/darwin-awards-pet-porn-and-hand-grenades/ |access-date=2012-08-31 |newspaper=123-reg |date=2008-04-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120831004041/http://www.123-reg.co.uk/blog/interviews/darwin-awards-pet-porn-and-hand-grenades/ |archive-date=2012-08-31 | Northcutt encountered some difficulty in publishing the first book, since most publishers would only offer her a deal if she agreed to remove the stories from the Internet, but she refused: "It was a community! I could not do that. Even though it might have cost me a lot of money, I kept saying no." She eventually found a publisher who agreed to print a book containing only 10% of the material gathered for the website. The first book turned out to be a success, and was listed on ''[[The New York Times]]''{{apostrophe}} best-seller list for 6 months.<ref name="John_123reg">{{cite news |author=John |title=Pet porn, rocket cars and hand grenades. |url=http://www.123-reg.co.uk/blog/interviews/darwin-awards-pet-porn-and-hand-grenades/ |access-date=2012-08-31 |newspaper=123-reg |date=2008-04-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120831004041/http://www.123-reg.co.uk/blog/interviews/darwin-awards-pet-porn-and-hand-grenades/ |archive-date=2012-08-31 }}</ref> | ||
Not all of the feedback from the stories Northcutt published was positive, and she occasionally received | Not all of the feedback from the stories Northcutt published was positive, and she occasionally received emails from people who knew the deceased. One such person advised: "This is horrible. It has shocked our community to the core. You should remove this." Northcutt demurred: "I can't. It's just too stupid." Northcutt kept the stories on the website and in her books, citing them as a "funny-but-true safety guide", and mentioning that children who read the book are going to be much more careful around explosives.<ref name="CNN_interview">{{cite news|title='Darwin Awards' author dedicated to documenting macabre mishaps. |url=http://articles.cnn.com/2001-01-03/entertainment/darwin.awards_1_deaths-darwin-award-wendy-northcutt |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130119105342/http://articles.cnn.com/2001-01-03/entertainment/darwin.awards_1_deaths-darwin-award-wendy-northcutt |archive-date=2013-01-19 |access-date=2012-09-18 |publisher=[[CNN]] |date=2001-01-03 }}</ref> | ||
The website also awards Honorable Mentions to individuals who survive their misadventures with their reproductive capacity intact. One example of this is [[Lawnchair Larry|Larry Walters]], who attached [[helium]]-filled [[weather balloon]]s to a lawn chair and floated far above [[Long Beach, California]], in July 1982. He reached an altitude of {{convert|16000|ft | The website also awards Honorable Mentions to individuals who survive their misadventures with their reproductive capacity intact. One example of this is [[Lawnchair Larry|Larry Walters]], who attached [[helium]]-filled [[weather balloon]]s to a lawn chair and floated far above [[Long Beach, California]], in July 1982. He reached an altitude of {{convert|16000|ft}}, but survived, to be later fined for crossing [[controlled airspace]].<ref name="Greany_Walker_Hecht">{{cite news |author1=Greany, Ed |author2=Walker, Douglas |author3=Hecht, Walter |title=Lawn Chair Larry |url=http://darwinawards.com/stupid/stupid1998-11.html |access-date=August 14, 2012 |newspaper=darwinawards.com}}</ref> (Walters later fell into depression and died by suicide, the same year Northcutt began the website.) Another notable honorable mention was given to the two men who attempted to burgle the home of footballer [[Duncan Ferguson]] (who had an infamous reputation for physical aggression on and off the pitch, including four convictions for assault and who had served six months in Glasgow's [[Barlinnie Prison]]) in 2001, with one burglar requiring three days' hospitalisation after being confronted by the player.<ref name="McSean_Nash">{{cite news |author1=McSean, Tony |author2=Nash, Pete |title=Ferguson 2, Thieves 0 |url=http://darwinawards.com/stupid/stupid2001-04.html |access-date=August 14, 2012 |publisher=darwinawards.com}}</ref> | ||
{{stack|[[File:Lendrem et al.-2014-Figure 1-The Darwin Awards sex differences in idiotic behavior.jpg|thumb|alt=Figure charting sex differences between Darwin Award winners, 1995–2014 |"Male and female Darwin Award winners: Line H<sub>0</sub> indicates expected percentages under the null hypothesis that males and females are equally idiotic."<ref name=Lendrem />]]}} | {{stack|[[File:Lendrem et al.-2014-Figure 1-The Darwin Awards sex differences in idiotic behavior.jpg|thumb|alt=Figure charting sex differences between Darwin Award winners, 1995–2014 |"Male and female Darwin Award winners: Line H<sub>0</sub> indicates expected percentages under the null hypothesis that males and females are equally idiotic."<ref name=Lendrem />]]}} | ||
A 2014 study published in the ''[[British Medical Journal]]'' found that between 1995 and 2014, males represented 88.7% of Darwin Award winners (see figure).<ref name=Lendrem>{{Cite journal| doi=10.1136/bmj.g7094 |volume=349 | | A 2014 study published in the ''[[British Medical Journal]]'' found that between 1995 and 2014, males represented 88.7% of Darwin Award winners (see figure).<ref name=Lendrem>{{Cite journal| doi=10.1136/bmj.g7094 |volume=349 |article-number=g7094 |last1=Lendrem |first1=Ben Alexander Daniel |last2=Lendrem |first2=Dennis William |last3=Gray |first3=Andy |last4=Isaacs |first4=John Dudley |title=The Darwin Awards: sex differences in idiotic behaviour |journal=BMJ |date=December 11, 2014 |issue=dec10 20 |pmid=25500113 |pmc=4263959}}{{open access}}</ref> | ||
The comedy film ''[[The Darwin Awards (film)|The Darwin Awards]]'' (2006), written and directed by [[Finn Taylor]], was based on the website and many of the Darwin Awards stories.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Johnson |first=G. Allen |title='Darwin Awards' explores the wacky ways some people end up dying |url=https://www.sfgate.com/thingstodo/article/darwin-awards-explores-the-wacky-ways-some-2505706.php |access-date=2024-05-07 |work=SFGATE |language=en}}</ref> | The comedy film ''[[The Darwin Awards (film)|The Darwin Awards]]'' (2006), written and directed by [[Finn Taylor]], was based on the website and many of the Darwin Awards stories.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Johnson |first=G. Allen |title='Darwin Awards' explores the wacky ways some people end up dying |url=https://www.sfgate.com/thingstodo/article/darwin-awards-explores-the-wacky-ways-some-2505706.php |access-date=2024-05-07 |work=SFGATE |language=en}}</ref> | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
=== Capable of sound judgment === | === Capable of sound judgment === | ||
In 2011 | In 2011, the awards targeted a 16-year-old boy in Leeds who died stealing copper wiring.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2011-01.html|title=Hotter Copper Whopper|work=The Darwin Awards|access-date=5 November 2025}}</ref> In 2012, Northcutt made similar light of a 14-year-old girl in Brazil who was killed while leaning out of a school bus window, but she was "disqualified" for the award itself because of the likely public objection owing to the girl's age, which Northcutt asserts is based on "[[magical thinking]]".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://homoeconomicusnet.wordpress.com/2012/12/10/darwin-awards-2012-too-young-to-include/|title=Darwin Awards 2012 – too young to include?|date=December 10, 2012|access-date=June 4, 2018}}</ref> | ||
Under this rule, and for reasons of good taste, individuals whose misfortune was caused by mental impairment or disability are not eligible for a Darwin Award, primarily to avoid mocking or making light of the disabled, and to ensure that the awards do not celebrate or trivialize tragedies involving vulnerable individuals. | Under this rule, and for reasons of good taste, individuals whose misfortune was caused by mental impairment or disability are not eligible for a Darwin Award, primarily to avoid mocking or making light of the disabled, and to ensure that the awards do not celebrate or trivialize tragedies involving vulnerable individuals. The same rule also disqualifies children under the age of 16 from winning the award.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules4.html|title=History and Rules - Maturity|date=2004|access-date=October 11, 2025}}</ref> | ||
== Reception == | == Reception == | ||
The Darwin Awards have received varying levels of scrutiny from the scientific community. In his book ''Encyclopedia of Evolution'', biology professor Stanley A. Rice comments: "Despite the tremendous value of these stories as entertainment, it is unlikely that they represent evolution in action", | The Darwin Awards have received varying levels of scrutiny from the scientific community. In his book ''Encyclopedia of Evolution'', biology professor Stanley A. Rice comments: "Despite the tremendous value of these stories as entertainment, it is unlikely that they represent evolution in action", stating that their stupidity could reflect their upbringing, and is less reflective of intelligence but rather impulsivity. And that impulsivity is a genetic trait in humans that can have evolutionary drawbacks, but remains because it also benefits in avoiding missed opportunities.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Rice|first=Stanley A.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YRcAVvmE6eMC&pg=PA108|title=Encyclopedia of Evolution|publisher=Infobase Publishing|year=2007|isbn=978-1-4381-1005-9|page=108|language=en}}</ref> On an essay in the book ''The Evolution of Evil'', professor Nathan Hallanger acknowledges that the Darwin Awards are meant as [[Black comedy|black humor]], but associates them with the [[eugenics]] movement of the early 20th century.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Bennett|first1=Gaymon|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Vca7Y0VI5aAC&pg=PA301|title=The Evolution of Evil|last2=Hewlett|first2=Martinez Joseph|last3=Peters|first3=Ted|last4=Russell|first4=Robert John|publisher=Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht|year=2008|isbn=978-3-525-56979-5|pages=301–302|language=en}}</ref> [[University of Oxford]] [[Biophysics|biophysicist]] Sylvia McLain, writing for ''[[The Guardian]]'', says that while the Darwin Awards are "clearly meant to be funny", they do not accurately represent how genetics work, further noting "...that 'smart' people do stupid things all the time."<ref>{{Cite web|last=McLain|first=Sylvia|date=2013-05-09|title=Evolutionary theory gone wrong|url=http://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2013/may/09/evolutionary-theory-gone-wrong-darwin|access-date=2022-02-08|website=[[The Guardian]]|language=en}}</ref> [[Geology|Geologist]] and [[Science communication|science communicator]] [[Sharon A. Hill]] has criticized the Darwin Awards on both scientific and ethical grounds, claiming that many factors in addition to genetics impact personal intelligence and judgement. She then says the awards exemplify "ignorance" and "heartlessness".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-07-03 |title=Why the Darwin Awards Should Die |url=https://sharonahill.com/2017/07/03/why-the-darwin-awards-should-die/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211220144554/https://sharonahill.com/2017/07/03/why-the-darwin-awards-should-die/ |archive-date=2021-12-20 |access-date=2022-02-08 |website=Sharon A. Hill |language=en-US}}</ref> | ||
==Notable recipients== | ==Notable recipients== | ||
* [[Garry Hoy]] who fell from the 24th story of the [[Toronto-Dominion Centre]] whilst attempting to demonstrate to a group of students that the windows were unbreakable. His death has been featured in television programs such as ''[[1000 Ways to Die]]'' and ''[[MythBusters]]''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Torontoist |date=2013-01-03 |title=Toronto Urban Legends: The Leaping Lawyer of Bay Street |url=https://torontoist.com/2013/01/urban-legends-the-leaping-lawyer-of-bay-street/ |access-date=2022-07-13 |website=Torontoist}}</ref> | * [[Garry Hoy]], who fell from the 24th story of the [[Toronto-Dominion Centre]] whilst attempting to demonstrate to a group of students that the windows were unbreakable. His death has been featured in television programs such as ''[[1000 Ways to Die]]'' and ''[[MythBusters]]''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Torontoist |date=2013-01-03 |title=Toronto Urban Legends: The Leaping Lawyer of Bay Street |url=https://torontoist.com/2013/01/urban-legends-the-leaping-lawyer-of-bay-street/ |access-date=2022-07-13 |website=Torontoist}}</ref> | ||
* [[Charles Stephens (daredevil)|Charles Stephens]], the first person to die while attempting to go over [[Niagara Falls]] in a barrel.<ref>{{cite web |title=Charles G. Stephens |url=http://www.reservationsystems.com/niagara_daredevils/charles_g_stephens.html | * [[Charles Stephens (daredevil)|Charles Stephens]], the first person to die while attempting to go over [[Niagara Falls]] in a barrel.<ref>{{cite web |title=Charles G. Stephens |url=http://www.reservationsystems.com/niagara_daredevils/charles_g_stephens.html |publisher=Niagara Daredevils |access-date=13 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141221153404/http://reservationsystems.com/niagara_daredevils/charles_g_stephens.html |archive-date=21 December 2014}}</ref> | ||
*[[John Allen Chau]], an American man killed by the [[Uncontacted peoples|uncontacted]] [[Sentinelese|Sentinelese people]] on [[North Sentinel Island]] while attempting to [[Proselytism|proselytise]] to them.<ref name="k343">{{cite web | last=Northcutt | first=Wendy | title=2018 Darwin Award: The Missionary Position | website=Darwin Awards | date=August 12, 2022 | url=https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2018-13.html | access-date=September 21, 2024}}</ref> | |||
==Books== | ==Books== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:28, 14 May 2026
| File:Darwinaward.png | |
Type of site | Humor |
|---|---|
| Owner | Wendy Northcutt |
| URL | darwinawards |
| Commercial | Yes |
| Launched | 1993 |
The Darwin Awards are a rhetorical tongue-in-cheek honor that originated in Usenet newsgroup discussions around 1985. They recognize individuals who have supposedly contributed to human evolution by selecting themselves out of the gene pool by dying or becoming sterilized by their own actions.
The project became more formalized with the creation of a website in 1993, followed by a series of books starting in 2000 by Wendy Northcutt. The criterion for the awards states: "In the spirit of Charles Darwin, the Darwin Awards commemorate individuals who protect our gene pool by making the ultimate sacrifice of their own lives. Darwin Award winners eliminate themselves in an extraordinarily idiotic manner, thereby improving our species' chances of long-term survival."[1]
Accidental self-sterilization also qualifies, but the site notes: "Of necessity, the award is usually bestowed posthumously." The candidate is disqualified, though, if "innocent bystanders" are killed in the process, as they might have contributed positively to the gene pool. The logical problem presented by award winners who may have had children is not addressed in the selection process owing to the difficulty of ascertaining a candidate's parental status; the Darwin Award rules state that the presence of offspring does not disqualify a nominee.[2]
History
The origin of the Darwin Awards can be traced back to posts on Usenet group discussions as early as 1985. A post on August 7, 1985, describes the awards as being "given posthumously to people who have made the supreme sacrifice to keep their genes out of our pool. Style counts, not everyone who dies from their own stupidity can win."[3] This early post cites an example of a person who tried to break into a vending machine and was crushed to death when he pulled it over on himself.[3] Another widely distributed early story mentioning the Darwin Awards is the JATO Rocket Car, which describes a man who strapped a jet-assisted take-off unit to his Chevrolet Impala in the Arizona desert and who died on the side of a cliff as his car achieved speeds of 250 to 300 miles per hour (400 to 480 km/h); this story was later determined to be an urban legend by the Arizona Department of Public Safety.[4] Wendy Northcutt says the official Darwin Awards website run by Northcutt does its best to confirm all stories submitted, listing them as, "confirmed true by Darwin". Many of the viral emails circulating the Internet, however, are hoaxes and urban legends.[5][6][7][8]
The website and collection of books were started in 1993 by Wendy Northcutt, who studied molecular biology at the University of California, Berkeley,[9] and neurobiology at Stanford University, doing research on cancer and telomerase. In her spare time, she organized chain letters from family members into the original Darwin Awards website hosted in her personal account space at Stanford. She eventually gave up practical research in 1998, and devoted herself full-time to her website and books in September 1999.[10] By 2002, the website received 7 million page hits per month.[11]
Northcutt encountered some difficulty in publishing the first book, since most publishers would only offer her a deal if she agreed to remove the stories from the Internet, but she refused: "It was a community! I could not do that. Even though it might have cost me a lot of money, I kept saying no." She eventually found a publisher who agreed to print a book containing only 10% of the material gathered for the website. The first book turned out to be a success, and was listed on The New York TimesTemplate:Apostrophe best-seller list for 6 months.[12]
Not all of the feedback from the stories Northcutt published was positive, and she occasionally received emails from people who knew the deceased. One such person advised: "This is horrible. It has shocked our community to the core. You should remove this." Northcutt demurred: "I can't. It's just too stupid." Northcutt kept the stories on the website and in her books, citing them as a "funny-but-true safety guide", and mentioning that children who read the book are going to be much more careful around explosives.[13]
The website also awards Honorable Mentions to individuals who survive their misadventures with their reproductive capacity intact. One example of this is Larry Walters, who attached helium-filled weather balloons to a lawn chair and floated far above Long Beach, California, in July 1982. He reached an altitude of 16,000 feet (4,900 m), but survived, to be later fined for crossing controlled airspace.[14] (Walters later fell into depression and died by suicide, the same year Northcutt began the website.) Another notable honorable mention was given to the two men who attempted to burgle the home of footballer Duncan Ferguson (who had an infamous reputation for physical aggression on and off the pitch, including four convictions for assault and who had served six months in Glasgow's Barlinnie Prison) in 2001, with one burglar requiring three days' hospitalisation after being confronted by the player.[15]
A 2014 study published in the British Medical Journal found that between 1995 and 2014, males represented 88.7% of Darwin Award winners (see figure).[16]
The comedy film The Darwin Awards (2006), written and directed by Finn Taylor, was based on the website and many of the Darwin Awards stories.[17]
Rules
Northcutt has stated five requirements for a Darwin Award:[1][9] Two of them are that the event must be verified to have happened, and that the nominee themselves were responsible for the activity. The others are:
Nominee must be dead or rendered sterile
This may be subject to dispute. Potential awardees may be out of the gene pool because of age; others have already reproduced before their deaths. To avoid debates about the possibility of in vitro fertilization, artificial insemination, or cloning, the original Darwin Awards book applied the following "deserted island" test to potential winners: If the person were unable to reproduce when stranded on a deserted island with a fertile member of the opposite sex, he or she would be considered sterile.[18] Winners of the award, in general, either are dead or have become unable to use their sexual organs.
Astoundingly stupid judgment
The candidate's foolishness must be unique and sensational, likely because the award is intended to be funny. A number of foolish but common activities, such as smoking in bed or refusing measles vaccination, are excluded from consideration. In contrast, self-immolation caused by smoking after being administered a flammable ointment in a hospital and specifically told not to smoke is grounds for nomination.[19] One "Honorable Mention" (a man who attempted suicide by swallowing nitroglycerin pills, and then tried to detonate them by running into a wall) is noted to be in this category, despite being intentional and self-inflicted (i.e. attempted suicide), which would normally disqualify the inductee.[20]
Capable of sound judgment
In 2011, the awards targeted a 16-year-old boy in Leeds who died stealing copper wiring.[21] In 2012, Northcutt made similar light of a 14-year-old girl in Brazil who was killed while leaning out of a school bus window, but she was "disqualified" for the award itself because of the likely public objection owing to the girl's age, which Northcutt asserts is based on "magical thinking".[22]
Under this rule, and for reasons of good taste, individuals whose misfortune was caused by mental impairment or disability are not eligible for a Darwin Award, primarily to avoid mocking or making light of the disabled, and to ensure that the awards do not celebrate or trivialize tragedies involving vulnerable individuals. The same rule also disqualifies children under the age of 16 from winning the award.[23]
Reception
The Darwin Awards have received varying levels of scrutiny from the scientific community. In his book Encyclopedia of Evolution, biology professor Stanley A. Rice comments: "Despite the tremendous value of these stories as entertainment, it is unlikely that they represent evolution in action", stating that their stupidity could reflect their upbringing, and is less reflective of intelligence but rather impulsivity. And that impulsivity is a genetic trait in humans that can have evolutionary drawbacks, but remains because it also benefits in avoiding missed opportunities.[24] On an essay in the book The Evolution of Evil, professor Nathan Hallanger acknowledges that the Darwin Awards are meant as black humor, but associates them with the eugenics movement of the early 20th century.[25] University of Oxford biophysicist Sylvia McLain, writing for The Guardian, says that while the Darwin Awards are "clearly meant to be funny", they do not accurately represent how genetics work, further noting "...that 'smart' people do stupid things all the time."[26] Geologist and science communicator Sharon A. Hill has criticized the Darwin Awards on both scientific and ethical grounds, claiming that many factors in addition to genetics impact personal intelligence and judgement. She then says the awards exemplify "ignorance" and "heartlessness".[27]
Notable recipients
- Garry Hoy, who fell from the 24th story of the Toronto-Dominion Centre whilst attempting to demonstrate to a group of students that the windows were unbreakable. His death has been featured in television programs such as 1000 Ways to Die and MythBusters.[28]
- Charles Stephens, the first person to die while attempting to go over Niagara Falls in a barrel.[29]
- John Allen Chau, an American man killed by the uncontacted Sentinelese people on North Sentinel Island while attempting to proselytise to them.[30]
Books
- Northcutt, Wendy (2000). The Darwin Awards: Evolution in Action. New York City: Plume. ISBN 978-0-525-94572-7.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2001). The Darwin Awards II: Unnatural Selection. New York City: Plume. ISBN 978-1-101-21896-9.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2003). The Darwin Awards 3: Survival of the Fittest. New York City: Plume. ISBN 978-0-525-94773-8.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2005). The Darwin Awards: The Descent of Man. Running Press Miniature Editions. ISBN 978-0-7624-2561-7.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2005). The Darwin Awards: Felonious Failures. Running Press Miniature Editions. ISBN 978-0-7624-2562-4.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2006). The Darwin Awards 4: Intelligent Design. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-1-101-21892-1.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2008). The Darwin Awards V: Next Evolution. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-0-14-301033-3.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2008). The Darwin Awards Next Evolution: Chlorinating the Gene Pool. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-1-4406-3677-6.
- Northcutt, Wendy (2010). The Darwin Awards: Countdown to Extinction. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-1-101-44465-8.
See also
- Accident-proneness
- List of inventors killed by their own inventions
- Preventable causes of death
- List of selfie-related injuries and deaths
- List of unusual deaths
- Just-world fallacy
- Schadenfreude
- Death by misadventure
- Herman Cain Award, a similar ironic award
- Ig Nobel Prize
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Northcutt, Wendy. "History & Rules". darwinawards.com. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
- ↑ "Darwin Awards: History and Rules". darwinawards.com. Retrieved February 24, 2020.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Freeman, Andy (August 7, 1985). "Darwin Awards". Google groups archive of net.bizarre. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
- ↑ Mikkelson, Barbara (November 12, 2006). "Carmageddon". Snopes. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
- ↑ "2003 Darwin Awards". Snopes.com. May 4, 2006. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
- ↑ "2004 Darwin Awards". Snopes.com. July 26, 2005. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
- ↑ "2005 Darwin Awards". Snopes.com. August 7, 2005. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
- ↑ "2006 Darwin Awards". Snopes.com. April 2, 2007. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Hansen, Suzy (November 10, 2000). "The Darwin Awards". Salon. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
- ↑ Hawkins, John. "A Conversation with Darwin (Webmaster of the Darwin Awards)". Right Wing News. Archived from the original on June 22, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
- ↑ Clark, Doug (November 14, 2002). "Let's hear it for natural selection". The Spokesman-Review. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
- ↑ John (April 14, 2008). "Pet porn, rocket cars and hand grenades". 123-reg. Archived from the original on August 31, 2012. Retrieved August 31, 2012.
- ↑ "'Darwin Awards' author dedicated to documenting macabre mishaps". CNN. January 3, 2001. Archived from the original on January 19, 2013. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
- ↑ Greany, Ed; Walker, Douglas; Hecht, Walter. "Lawn Chair Larry". darwinawards.com. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
- ↑ McSean, Tony; Nash, Pete. "Ferguson 2, Thieves 0". darwinawards.com. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.open access
- ↑ Johnson, G. Allen. "'Darwin Awards' explores the wacky ways some people end up dying". SFGATE. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
- ↑ Northcutt, Wendy (2000). The Darwin Awards: Evolution in Action. New York City: PLUME (The Penguin Group). pp. 2–6. ISBN 978-0-525-94572-7.
- ↑ C.J.; Malcolm, Andrew; Sims, Iain; Beeston, Richard. "Stubbed Out". darwinawards.com. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
- ↑ Cawcutt, Tom. "Phenomenal Failure". darwinawards.com. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
- ↑ "Hotter Copper Whopper". The Darwin Awards. Retrieved November 5, 2025.
- ↑ "Darwin Awards 2012 – too young to include?". December 10, 2012. Retrieved June 4, 2018.
- ↑ "History and Rules - Maturity". 2004. Retrieved October 11, 2025.
- ↑ Rice, Stanley A. (2007). Encyclopedia of Evolution. Infobase Publishing. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-4381-1005-9.
- ↑ Bennett, Gaymon; Hewlett, Martinez Joseph; Peters, Ted; Russell, Robert John (2008). The Evolution of Evil. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. pp. 301–302. ISBN 978-3-525-56979-5.
- ↑ McLain, Sylvia (May 9, 2013). "Evolutionary theory gone wrong". The Guardian. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
- ↑ "Why the Darwin Awards Should Die". Sharon A. Hill. July 3, 2017. Archived from the original on December 20, 2021. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
- ↑ Torontoist (January 3, 2013). "Toronto Urban Legends: The Leaping Lawyer of Bay Street". Torontoist. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ↑ "Charles G. Stephens". Niagara Daredevils. Archived from the original on December 21, 2014. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
- ↑ Northcutt, Wendy (August 12, 2022). "2018 Darwin Award: The Missionary Position". Darwin Awards. Retrieved September 21, 2024.