- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Illusion of explanatory depth
Created by Sunrise (talk). Nominated by BuySomeApples (talk) at 02:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New Enough:
Y
- Long Enough:
N - Not sure, it is just 11 characters over the absolute minimum and the article should probably be expanded before running as it's a borderline stub.
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited: Y - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting: Y
|
Overall: 
Nice article but could use expansion (t · c) buidhe 03:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the nomination! I have added a few more sentences from the material I collected when writing the article, if that helps with the length. There is more available online, so I encourage anyone else to add content as well. Sunrise (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: The article has been expanded and is now 1854 characters of prose thanks to @Sunrise:'s great work. BuySomeApples (talk) 00:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
OK, but I think it should ideally be expanded more before running on the main page. (t · c) buidhe 01:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Nice article but could use expansion (t · c) buidhe 03:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
