Bureaucrats, Check users, editor, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, reviewer, smwadministrator, smwcurator, smweditor, Suppressors, Administrators
12,798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Template:Did you know nominations/623rd Field Artillery Regiment (view source)
Revision as of 18:44, 8 February 2022
, 18:44, 8 February 2022Imported page
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2022]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 20:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)<br />
{{DYK conditions}}
{{DYK header|623rd Field Artillery Regiment}}
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=623rd Field Artillery Regiment|623rd Field Artillery Regiment}}
* ... that the [[special designation]] of the '''[[623rd Field Artillery Regiment]]''' is being reviewed as it refers to Confederate general [[John Hunt Morgan]]? <small>Source: "The Morgan’s Men designation and other items with potential links to the Confederacy, such as patches and call signs, are under review, said Lt. Col. Stephen Martin, a spokesman for the Kentucky National Guard. Part of the review will determine whether the unit should request to change Morgan’s Men and potential candidates to replace it, Martin said." from: {{cite news |last1=Horton |first1=Alex |title=Army continues to honor Confederate unit histories, even as base names draw scrutiny |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/03/11/army-confederate-history/ |access-date=17 January 2022 |work=Washington Post |date=11 March 2021}}</small>
** '''ALT1''': ... that the '''[[623rd Field Artillery Regiment]]''' is one of a handful of American military units whose [[special designation]]s refer to their [[Confederate States Army]] lineage? <small>Source: "At least three units have official nicknames that honor their Confederate roots, according to a count by the Army provided to The Washington Post. One of them, a unit in Virginia, is called “Stonewall Brigade” after Confederate Gen. Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson. At least three others have names tied to the Confederacy in other ways, the Army said." from: {{cite news |last1=Horton |first1=Alex |title=Army continues to honor Confederate unit histories, even as base names draw scrutiny |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/03/11/army-confederate-history/ |access-date=17 January 2022 |work=Washington Post |date=11 March 2021}}</small>
** ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lettuce club]]
** ''Comment'': I have not found any report of the review, started in March 2021, yet concluding
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self-nominated at 11:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC).</small>
* {{DYK checklist
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
|newness = y
|length = y
|eligibilityother =
|sourced = y
|neutral = y
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother =
|hookcited = y
|hookinterest = y
|hookother =
|picfree = NA
|picused =
|picclear =
|qpq = y
|status = y
|comments = Looks good. I wasn't aware what a special designation was before and once I knew what it means the hook made a lot more sense. I like the second hook more as it's easier to understand without knowing what a special designation is. Moved from user page on 17 January, almost 8,000 characters, well sourced, no obvious plagiarism, hook is verified.
|sign = [[User:Eóin|Eóin]] ([[User talk:Eóin|talk]]) 21:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 20:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)<br />
{{DYK conditions}}
{{DYK header|623rd Field Artillery Regiment}}
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=623rd Field Artillery Regiment|623rd Field Artillery Regiment}}
* ... that the [[special designation]] of the '''[[623rd Field Artillery Regiment]]''' is being reviewed as it refers to Confederate general [[John Hunt Morgan]]? <small>Source: "The Morgan’s Men designation and other items with potential links to the Confederacy, such as patches and call signs, are under review, said Lt. Col. Stephen Martin, a spokesman for the Kentucky National Guard. Part of the review will determine whether the unit should request to change Morgan’s Men and potential candidates to replace it, Martin said." from: {{cite news |last1=Horton |first1=Alex |title=Army continues to honor Confederate unit histories, even as base names draw scrutiny |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/03/11/army-confederate-history/ |access-date=17 January 2022 |work=Washington Post |date=11 March 2021}}</small>
** '''ALT1''': ... that the '''[[623rd Field Artillery Regiment]]''' is one of a handful of American military units whose [[special designation]]s refer to their [[Confederate States Army]] lineage? <small>Source: "At least three units have official nicknames that honor their Confederate roots, according to a count by the Army provided to The Washington Post. One of them, a unit in Virginia, is called “Stonewall Brigade” after Confederate Gen. Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson. At least three others have names tied to the Confederacy in other ways, the Army said." from: {{cite news |last1=Horton |first1=Alex |title=Army continues to honor Confederate unit histories, even as base names draw scrutiny |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/03/11/army-confederate-history/ |access-date=17 January 2022 |work=Washington Post |date=11 March 2021}}</small>
** ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lettuce club]]
** ''Comment'': I have not found any report of the review, started in March 2021, yet concluding
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self-nominated at 11:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC).</small>
* {{DYK checklist
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
|newness = y
|length = y
|eligibilityother =
|sourced = y
|neutral = y
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother =
|hookcited = y
|hookinterest = y
|hookother =
|picfree = NA
|picused =
|picclear =
|qpq = y
|status = y
|comments = Looks good. I wasn't aware what a special designation was before and once I knew what it means the hook made a lot more sense. I like the second hook more as it's easier to understand without knowing what a special designation is. Moved from user page on 17 January, almost 8,000 characters, well sourced, no obvious plagiarism, hook is verified.
|sign = [[User:Eóin|Eóin]] ([[User talk:Eóin|talk]]) 21:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->