Bureaucrats, Check users, editor, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, reviewer, smwadministrator, smwcurator, smweditor, Suppressors, Administrators
12,798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Template:Did you know nominations/Courant Snyder parameters (view source)
Revision as of 18:46, 8 February 2022
, 18:46, 8 February 2022Imported page
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2022]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 12:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)<br />
{{DYK conditions}}
{{DYK header|Courant–Snyder parameters}}
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Courant Snyder parameters|Courant–Snyder parameters}}
* <s>... that although the '''[[Courant–Snyder parameters]]''' in accelerator physics are often referred to as Twiss parameters, [[Richard Q. Twiss]] had no involvement in creating them?</s> <small>Source: "Some years ago Frank Cole contacted Richard Twiss, who didn’t understand why the parameters were named for him." [https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1510283]</small>
**
** ''Comment'': This is my first DYK nomination, sorry if I've made any procedural errors.
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC).</small>
** '''ALT1''' ... that although the '''[[Courant–Snyder parameters]]''' in accelerator physics are often referred to as "Twiss parameters", [[Richard Q. Twiss]] had no idea how his name came to be associated with them? <small>Source: "Some years ago Frank Cole contacted Richard Twiss, who didn’t understand why the parameters were named for him." [https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1510283]</small>
* '''Comment''' from nominator: The original article has been moved to [[Courant–Snyder parameters]] Is there anything that needs to be done to update this nomination? Thanks! [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 22:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
:* No, you're good. Just added the endash to the hook. [[User:Sammi Brie|<span style="color:#f06292">Sammi Brie</span>]] (she/her • [[User talk:Sammi Brie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sammi Brie|c]]) 01:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
{{reply to|SeoR}} Thanks for the feedback! I've added another reference to the lead and the "equations of motion section," and I tried to pick one that's actually available online, and has nice pictures, for the first cite. I like your version of the hook much better, but I don't know the actual process for accepting it - what do I edit where? Thanks again! [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 15:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
{{reply to|SeoR}} I did make one small change - Twiss is deceased, so I changed "has" to "had" in the alternate hook. I see you already added a strikethrough to the original hook. Is the process now complete from my end? Thanks! [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 19:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
{{DYK checklist
|newness = y
|length = y
|eligibilityother =
|sourced = y
|neutral = y
|plagiarismfree =y
|policyother =
|hookcited = y
|hookinterest = y
|hookother =
|picfree =
|picused =
|picclear =
|qpq = NA
|status = y
|comments = A nice compact article, established 20/1 in mainspace and submitted 27/1 so fine on timing. Volume sufficient (and that's omitting the equations, which DYKCheck can't count), no sign of prev. DYK or ITN. A little work needed on citation - we're strict about "min. 1 cite per paragraph" and here the opening and "Equation of motion" bit are uncited - I imagine this is no problem to fix. Earwig is 0% and otherwise most material will be seen in texts but I think we're clear on copyvio. Continuing... I think we're almost there. One thing - the cite doesn't quite say "no involvement in creation" though this can be implied, and found with good old Google, etc. - but still, the material as now used does not quite match. Can you either find a cite which addresses this more directly, or consider an alternative wording, such as the example above? Many thanks, and looking forward to being able to approve very soon. / Thanks! Both issues are now resolved, if the alt wording is used. I appreciate your kind words about the alternative - to adopt it, and proceed, we put use the <s> </s> pair around it, to strike it through. On this basis, I can approve; feel free to add any other alternative wording. / And yes, thanks, that's a good catch on the tense - and it's good to go. A DYK administrator will be along in the near term to consider promotion to the queues for posting. Thanks, and welcome back again soon!
|sign = [[User:SeoR|SeoR]] ([[User talk:SeoR|talk]]) 20:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
}}
</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 12:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)<br />
{{DYK conditions}}
{{DYK header|Courant–Snyder parameters}}
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Courant Snyder parameters|Courant–Snyder parameters}}
* <s>... that although the '''[[Courant–Snyder parameters]]''' in accelerator physics are often referred to as Twiss parameters, [[Richard Q. Twiss]] had no involvement in creating them?</s> <small>Source: "Some years ago Frank Cole contacted Richard Twiss, who didn’t understand why the parameters were named for him." [https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1510283]</small>
**
** ''Comment'': This is my first DYK nomination, sorry if I've made any procedural errors.
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC).</small>
** '''ALT1''' ... that although the '''[[Courant–Snyder parameters]]''' in accelerator physics are often referred to as "Twiss parameters", [[Richard Q. Twiss]] had no idea how his name came to be associated with them? <small>Source: "Some years ago Frank Cole contacted Richard Twiss, who didn’t understand why the parameters were named for him." [https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1510283]</small>
* '''Comment''' from nominator: The original article has been moved to [[Courant–Snyder parameters]] Is there anything that needs to be done to update this nomination? Thanks! [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 22:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
:* No, you're good. Just added the endash to the hook. [[User:Sammi Brie|<span style="color:#f06292">Sammi Brie</span>]] (she/her • [[User talk:Sammi Brie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sammi Brie|c]]) 01:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
{{reply to|SeoR}} Thanks for the feedback! I've added another reference to the lead and the "equations of motion section," and I tried to pick one that's actually available online, and has nice pictures, for the first cite. I like your version of the hook much better, but I don't know the actual process for accepting it - what do I edit where? Thanks again! [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 15:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
{{reply to|SeoR}} I did make one small change - Twiss is deceased, so I changed "has" to "had" in the alternate hook. I see you already added a strikethrough to the original hook. Is the process now complete from my end? Thanks! [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 19:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
{{DYK checklist
|newness = y
|length = y
|eligibilityother =
|sourced = y
|neutral = y
|plagiarismfree =y
|policyother =
|hookcited = y
|hookinterest = y
|hookother =
|picfree =
|picused =
|picclear =
|qpq = NA
|status = y
|comments = A nice compact article, established 20/1 in mainspace and submitted 27/1 so fine on timing. Volume sufficient (and that's omitting the equations, which DYKCheck can't count), no sign of prev. DYK or ITN. A little work needed on citation - we're strict about "min. 1 cite per paragraph" and here the opening and "Equation of motion" bit are uncited - I imagine this is no problem to fix. Earwig is 0% and otherwise most material will be seen in texts but I think we're clear on copyvio. Continuing... I think we're almost there. One thing - the cite doesn't quite say "no involvement in creation" though this can be implied, and found with good old Google, etc. - but still, the material as now used does not quite match. Can you either find a cite which addresses this more directly, or consider an alternative wording, such as the example above? Many thanks, and looking forward to being able to approve very soon. / Thanks! Both issues are now resolved, if the alt wording is used. I appreciate your kind words about the alternative - to adopt it, and proceed, we put use the <s> </s> pair around it, to strike it through. On this basis, I can approve; feel free to add any other alternative wording. / And yes, thanks, that's a good catch on the tense - and it's good to go. A DYK administrator will be along in the near term to consider promotion to the queues for posting. Thanks, and welcome back again soon!
|sign = [[User:SeoR|SeoR]] ([[User talk:SeoR|talk]]) 20:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
}}
</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->