Bureaucrats, Check users, editor, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, reviewer, smwadministrator, smwcurator, smweditor, Suppressors, Administrators
12,798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (view source)
Revision as of 20:16, 4 December 2021
, 20:16, 4 December 2021Imported page
<noinclude>{{short description|Wikipedia policy on material about living persons}}{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}</noinclude>
{{For|policy on whether an individual is sufficiently noteworthy to have an article|Wikipedia:Notability (people)}}
{{notice|{{strong|Report problems about particular biographical material on Wikipedia}} to the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]]. {{xref|See also {{section link ||Dealing with articles about yourself}}, below.}}}}
{{policy|WP:BLP|WP:LIVE}}
{{nutshell|Material about living persons added to {{em|any}} Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]], [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality]], and [[Wikipedia:No original research|avoidance of original research]].}}
{{User:Oshwah/Templates/OfferHelp}}
[[File:Contactus-wmcolors.svg|thumb|If you have a complaint about a biography of a living person, and you wish to contact the [[Wikimedia Foundation]], see {{strong|[[foundationsite:about/contact|Contact us]]}}.]]
Editors must take particular care when adding '''information about living persons''' to {{em|any}} [[Wikipedia]] page.{{efn|People are presumed to be living unless there is reason to believe otherwise. This policy does not apply to people [[declared death in absentia|declared dead {{lang|la|in absentia}}]].}} Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere {{em|strictly}} to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies:
* [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]] (NPOV)
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]] (V)
* [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]] (NOR)
We must get the article {{em|right}}. Be very firm about the use of high-quality [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources|sources]]. All quotations and any material {{strong|challenged or likely to be challenged}} must be supported by an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations|inline citation]] to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be {{strong|removed immediately and without waiting for discussion}}.<ref name="ZeroInformation">{{Cite mailing list|url=https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html|title=Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information|date=16 May 2006|access-date=22 June 2018|mailing-list=[[WP:WikiEN-l|WikiEN-l]]|publisher=[[Wikimedia Foundation]]|last=Wales|first=Jimmy|author-link=Jimmy Wales|quote=It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.|archive-url=https://archive.is/20180622205129/https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html|archive-date=22 June 2018}}{{pb}}{{Cite mailing list|url=https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html|title=Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information|date=19 May 2006|access-date=22 June 2018|mailing-list=WikiEN-l|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|last=Wales|first=Jimmy|quote=If you see an unsourced statement that would be libel if false, and it makes you feel suspicious enough to want to tag it as {{tlf|citation needed}}, please do not do that! Please just remove the statement and ask a question on the talk page.|archive-url=https://archive.is/20180622205914/https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html|archive-date=22 June 2018}}{{pb}}{{Cite web|url=https://wikimania2006.wikimedia.org/wiki/Archives/Jimbo_Keynote|title=Archives/Jimbo Keynote|last=Wales|first=Jimmy|date=4 August 2006|department=[[Wikimania 2006]]|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|archive-url=https://wikimania2006.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archives/Jimbo_Keynote&oldid=9800|archive-date=8 August 2006|url-status=live|access-date=22 June 2018|quote=One of the social things that I think we can do is [[WP:BIO]] [...] I think social policies have evolved in recent years, I mean the recent months, to actually handle this problem a lot better. A lot of the admins and experienced editors are taking a really strong stand against unsourced claims, which is always a typical example of the problem. [...] And the few people who are still sort of in the old days, saying, 'Well, you know, it's a wiki, why don't we just... ', yeah, they're sort of falling by the wayside, because lots of people are saying actually, we have a really serious responsibility to get things right.}}</ref> Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].
Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]], not a [[tabloid journalism|tabloid]]: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages, including talk pages.{{efn|For examples of arbitration cases that refer to this policy's parameters, see:{{pb}}
[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden#WP:BLP applies to all living persons mentioned in an article|Rachel Marsden case]], 28 November 2006: "Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons applies to all living persons in an entry, not merely the subject of the entry."{{pb}}
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute#The BLP policy and article titles|Manning naming dispute]], 16 October 2013: "The [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy applies to all references to living persons throughout Wikipedia, including the titles of articles and pages and all other portions of any page."}} The [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility for providing citations|burden of evidence]] rests with the editor who adds or restores the material.
{{Content policy list}}
==Writing style==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPSTYLE}}
===Tone===
BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]] have published about the subjects, and [[#Using the subject as a self-published source|in some circumstances]] what the subjects have published about themselves. Summarize how actions and achievements are characterized by reliable sources without giving undue weight to [[WP:RECENTISM|recent events]]. Do not label people with [[WP:LABEL|contentious labels]], [[WP:PEACOCK|loaded language]], or terms that lack precision, unless a person is commonly described that way in reliable sources. Instead use clear, direct language and let facts alone do the talking.
===Balance===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPBALANCE}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Coatrack articles}}
Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Undue weight|disproportionate space]] to particular viewpoints; the views of small minorities should not be included at all. Care must be taken with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Article structure|article structure]] to ensure the overall presentation and section headings are broadly neutral. Beware of [[Association fallacy|claims that rely on guilt by association]], and biased, malicious or overly promotional content.
The idea expressed in [[meta:Eventualism|Eventualism]]—that every Wikipedia article is a work in progress, and that it is therefore okay for an article to be temporarily unbalanced because it will eventually be brought into shape—does {{em|not}} apply to biographies. Given their potential impact on biography subjects' lives, biographies must be fair to their subjects at all times.
===Attack pages===
{{see|Wikipedia:Attack pages|Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G10}}
Pages that are unsourced and negative in tone, especially when they appear to have been created primarily to disparage the subject, should be deleted at once if there is no policy-compliant version to revert to; {{xref|see {{section link ||Summary deletion, creation prevention, and courtesy blanking}}, below}}. Non-administrators should tag them with {{tl|db-attack}} or {{tl|db-negublp}}. Creation of such pages, especially when repeated or in bad faith, is grounds for immediate blocking.
==Reliable sources==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPRS|WP:BLPSOURCES|WP:BLPSOURCE}}
===<span class="anchor" id="CHALLENGE"></span> Challenged or likely to be challenged===
{{main|Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources}}
Wikipedia's sourcing policy, [[WP:V|Verifiability]], says that all quotations and any material {{strong|challenged or likely to be challenged}} must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations|inline citation]]; material not meeting this standard may be removed. This policy extends that principle, adding that {{strong|contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion}}. This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable and whether it is in a biography or in some other article. The material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is [[tabloid journalism]]. When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared in more reliable sources.
===<span class="anchor" id="Misuse of primary sources"></span> Avoid misuse of primary sources===
<!-- This Anchor tag serves to provide a permanent target for incoming section links. Please do not move it out of the section heading, even though it disrupts edit summary generation (you can manually fix the edit summary before saving your changes). Please do not modify it, even if you modify the section title. It is always best to anchor an old section header that has been changed so that links to it won't be broken. See [[Template:Anchor]] for details. (This text: [[Template:Anchor comment]]) -->
{{see|Wikipedia:No original research#Primary}}
{{shortcut|WP:BLPPRIMARY}}
Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do {{strong|{{em|not}}}} use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do {{strong|{{em|not}}}} use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it {{em|may}} be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, [[WP:NOR|no original research]], and the other sourcing policies.{{efn|Please note that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Exceptional claims require exceptional sources|exceptional claims]] require exceptional sources.}}
===Self-published sources===
====Avoid self-published sources====
{{anchor|Avoid self-published sources}}
{{shortcut|WP:BLPSPS}}
Never use [[Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published works|self-published sources]]—including but not limited to books, [[zine]]s, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published {{strong|by the subject of the article}}. "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some news organizations host online columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control. Posts left by readers are never acceptable as sources. See {{section link||Images}} below for our policy on self-published images.
====Using the subject as a self-published source====
{{shortcut|WP:BLPSELFPUB}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources}}
There are living persons who publish material {{strong|about themselves}}, such as through press releases or personal websites. Such material may be used as a source only if:
# it is not unduly self-serving;
# it does not involve claims about third parties;
# it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject;
# there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and
# the article is not based primarily on such sources.
===Avoid gossip and feedback loops===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPGOSSIP}}
{{See also|WP:NOTNEWS{{!}}Wikipedia is not a newspaper|Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources#Breaking news}}
Avoid repeating [[gossip]]. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether the material is being presented as true; and whether, even if true, it is relevant to a disinterested article about the subject. Be wary of relying on sources that use [[weasel word]]s and that attribute material to anonymous sources. Also beware of [[circular reporting]], in which material in a Wikipedia article gets picked up by a source, which is later cited in the Wikipedia article to support the original edit.
===Remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced<span class="anchor" id="Rm1"></span><span class="anchor" id="Remove contentious material"></span><span class="anchor" id="Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material"></span>===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:GRAPEVINE|WP:BLPREMOVE}}
{{see also|Wikipedia:Libel}}
Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that:
# is unsourced or poorly sourced;
# is an original interpretation or analysis of a source, or a synthesis of sources {{xref|(see also [[Wikipedia:No original research]])}};
# relies on self-published sources, unless written by the subject of the BLP {{xref|(see {{section link ||Using the subject as a self-published source}}, above)}}; or
# relies on sources that fail in some other way to meet [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] standards.
Note that, although the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#3RR exemptions|three-revert rule does not apply to such removals]], what counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Editors who find themselves in edit wars over potentially defamatory material about living persons should consider raising the matter at the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]] instead of relying on the exemption.
Administrators may enforce the removal of clear BLP violations with page protection or by blocking the violator(s), even if they have been editing the article themselves or are in some other way involved. In less clear cases they should request the attention of an [[WP:UNINVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrator at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents |administrators' noticeboard/Incidents page]]. {{xref|See {{section link ||Role of administrators}}, below}}.
===<span class="anchor" id="Further reading and external links"></span> Further reading, External links, and See also===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPEL|WP:BLPFR|WP:BLPSEEALSO}}
External links about living persons, whether in BLPs or elsewhere, are held to a higher standard than for other topics. [[WP:Verifiability#Questionable sources|Questionable]] or [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]] should not be included in the "Further reading" or "External links" sections of BLPs, and, when including such links in other articles, make sure the material linked to does not violate this policy. Self-published sources written or published by the subject of a BLP may be included in the "Further reading" or "External links" sections of that BLP with caution {{xref|(see {{section link||Using the subject as a self-published source}}, above)}}. In general, do not link to websites that contradict the spirit of this policy or violate the [[Wikipedia:External links|external links guideline]]. Where that guideline is inconsistent with this or any other policy, the policies prevail.
"See also" links, whether placed in [[MOS:SEEALSO|their own section]] or in a note within the text, should not be used to imply any contentious labeling, association, or claim regarding a living person, and must adhere to Wikipedia's policy of [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]].
==Presumption in favor of privacy==
===Avoid victimization===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:AVOIDVICTIM}}
When writing about a person noteworthy only for one or two events, including every detail can lead to problems—even when the material is well sourced. When in doubt, biographies should be pared back to a version that is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic. This is of particular importance when dealing with living individuals whose notability stems largely or entirely from being victims of another's actions. Wikipedia editors must not act, intentionally or otherwise, in a way that amounts to participating in or prolonging the victimization.
===Public figures===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PUBLICFIGURE|WP:WELLKNOWN|WP:BLPPUBLIC}}
{{see also|Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual}}
In the case of [[public figure]]s, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If you cannot find {{em|multiple}} reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out.
* '''Example:''' "John Doe had a messy divorce from Jane Doe." Is the divorce important to the article, and was it published by third-party reliable sources? If not, leave it out. If so, [[WP:LABEL|avoid use of "messy"]] and stick to the facts: "John Doe and Jane Doe divorced."
* '''Example:''' A politician is alleged to have had an affair. It is denied, but multiple major newspapers publish the allegations, and there is a public scandal. The allegation belongs in the biography, citing those sources. However, it should state only that the politician was {{em|alleged}} to have had the affair, not that the affair actually {{em|occurred}}.
{{anchor|Denial}}If the subject has denied such allegations, their denial(s) should also be reported, while adhering to appropriate [[WP:DUE|due weight]] of all sources covering the subject and avoiding [[WP:FALSEBALANCE|false balance]].
===<span class="anchor" id="Relatively unknown"></span> People who are relatively unknown===
{{Redirect|WP:NPF|information regarding newly created pages on Wikipedia ("New Pages Feed")|Wikipedia:Page Curation}}
{{see also|Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual}}
{{Policy shortcut|WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE|WP:NPF}}
Many Wikipedia articles contain material on people who are not well known, even if they are [[WP:N|notable]] enough for their own article. In such cases, exercise restraint and include {{em|only}} material relevant to the person's notability, focusing on high-quality [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]]. Material published by the subject may be used, but with caution {{xref|(see {{slink||Using the subject as a self-published source}}, above)}}. Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there are additional protections for subjects who are not public figures.
===Privacy of personal information and using primary sources===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPPRIVACY|WP:DOB}}
{{see also|#Privacy of names}}
With [[identity theft]] a serious ongoing concern, many people regard their full names and dates of birth as private. Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public. If a subject complains about our inclusion of their date of birth, or the person is borderline [[WP:N|notable]], err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it. In a similar vein, articles should not include postal addresses, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, or other contact information for living persons, although links to [[WP:ELOFFICIAL|websites maintained by the subject]] are generally permitted. See {{slink||Avoid misuse of primary sources}} regarding the misuse of primary sources to obtain personal information about subjects.
Consensus has indicated that the standard for inclusion of personal information of living persons is higher than mere existence of a reliable source that could be verified.<ref>[[Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons/Archive_45#Removal of WP:DOB]]</ref>
If there is a situation in which multiple different independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] state differing years or dates of birth in conflict, consensus has been found to include all birth dates/years for which a reliable source exists, clearly noting discrepancies. In this situation, editors may not include only one date/year for which they consider "most likely". In this situation, editors may not include merely a single date from one of two or more reliable sources. Original research cannot be used to extrapolate the date of birth.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive_165#People's birthdate, conflicting (reliable) sources, and WP:SYNTHESIS]]</ref>
If you see personal information such as phone numbers, addresses, account numbers, etc. in a BLP or anywhere on Wikipedia, edit the page to remove it and {{strong|[[WP:RFO|contact the oversight team]]}} so that they can evaluate it and possibly remove it from the page history. To reduce the chances of triggering the [[Streisand effect]], use a bland/generic edit summary and {{em|do not}} mention that you will be requesting Oversight.
A verified social media account of an adult article subject saying about themselves something along the lines of "today is my 50th birthday" falls under [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves|self-published sources]] for purposes of reporting a full date of birth. It is usable if there is no reason to doubt it.<ref>[[Special:Permalink/1030363909#Tweets announcing "Happy birthday to me! I'm 21 today!"|June 2021, talk page discussion]]</ref>
===Subjects notable only for one event===
<!-- "Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event" links here -->
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLP1E}}
{{See|Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event|Wikipedia:What BLP1E is not}}
[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS|Wikipedia is not news, or an indiscriminate collection of information]]. Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article. We generally should avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met:
# If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.
# If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a [[Wikipedia:Who is a low profile individual|low-profile individual]]. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. In such cases, it is usually better to [[Wikipedia:Merging|merge]] the information and [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] the person's name to the event article.
# If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. [[John Hinckley Jr.]], for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the [[Reagan assassination attempt]], was significant and his role was both substantial and well documented.
The significance of an event or the individual's role is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources. It is important for editors to understand two clear differentiations of the ''[[Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event|people notable for only one event]]'' guideline (''[[WP:BIO1E]]'') when compared with this policy (''WP:BLP1E''): ''WP:BLP1E'' should be applied only to biographies of {{em|living}} people, or those who have recently died, and to biographies of [[Wikipedia:Who is a low profile individual|low-profile individuals]].
In addition, some subject-specific notability guidelines, such as [[Wikipedia:Notability (sports)]], provide criteria that may support the notability of certain individuals who are known chiefly for one event.
===<span class="anchor" id="BLPCRIME"></span><span class="anchor" id="BLPCRIM"></span><span class="anchor" id="CRIME"></span> People accused of crime===
<!--Don't remove [[Template:Anchor|anchor template]] (or edit the name within their doubled, curly brackets).-->{{see also|Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Criminal acts|Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Crime victims and perpetrators}}{{shortcut|WP:BLPCRIME|WP:SUSPECT}}
A living person accused of a crime is [[presumption of innocence|presumed innocent]] until convicted by a court of law. Accusations, investigations and arrests do not amount to a conviction. For individuals who are [[WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE|not public figures]]; that is, individuals not covered by {{section link||Public figures}}, editors must seriously consider {{strong|not}} including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured.
If different judicial proceedings result in seemingly contradictory outcomes that do not overrule each other,{{efn|For example, [[O. J. Simpson]] was [[O. J. Simpson murder case|acquitted]] in 1995 of the murder of [[Nicole Brown Simpson]] and [[Ronald Goldman]], but was found liable for their [[wrongful death]]s in a civil trial two years later.}} include sufficient explanatory information.
===Privacy of names===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPNAME|WP:LPNAME}}
Caution should be applied when identifying individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event. When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context. When deciding whether to include a name, its publication in secondary sources other than news media, such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories. Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value.
The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject. However, names of family members who are not also notable public figures {{em|must}} be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced.
==<span class="anchor" id="Importation of off-wiki disputes into Wikipedia"></span> Using BLPs to continue disputes==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPCOI}}
Wikipedia articles concerning living persons may include material—where relevant, properly weighted, and reliably sourced—about controversies or disputes in which the article subject has been involved. Wikipedia is not a forum provided for parties to off-wiki disputes to continue their hostilities. Experience has shown that misusing Wikipedia to perpetuate legal, political, social, literary, scholarly, or other disputes is harmful to the subjects of biographical articles, to other parties in the dispute, and to Wikipedia itself.
Therefore, an editor who is involved in a significant controversy or dispute with another individual—whether on- or off-wiki—or who is an avowed rival of that individual, should not edit that person's biography or other material about that person, given the [[WP:POTENTIALCOI|potential conflict of interest]]. More generally, editors who have a strongly negative or positive view of the subject of a biographical article should be especially careful to edit that article [[WP:NPOV|neutrally]], if they choose to edit it at all.{{efn|The [https://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_conflicts/foundation/index.html Columbia Center for New Media Teaching and Learning], Columbia University: "A conflict of interest involves the abuse – actual, apparent, or potential – of the trust that people have in professionals. The simplest working definition states: A conflict of interest is a situation in which financial or other personal considerations have the potential to compromise or bias professional judgment and objectivity. An apparent conflict of interest is one in which a reasonable person would think that the professional's judgment is likely to be compromised. A potential conflict of interest involves a situation that may develop into an actual conflict of interest. It is important to note that a conflict of interest exists whether or not decisions are affected by a personal interest; a conflict of interest implies only the potential for bias, not a likelihood. It is also important to note that a conflict of interest is not considered misconduct in research, since the definition for misconduct is currently limited to fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism."{{pb}}
[https://web.archive.org/web/20070630123620/http://nytco.com/press/ethics.html The New York Times Company]: "Conflicts of interest, real or apparent, may arise in many areas. They may involve tensions between journalists' professional obligations to our audience and their relationships with news sources, advocacy groups, advertisers, or competitors; with one another; or with the company or one of its units. And at a time when two-career families are the norm, the civic and professional activities of spouses, household members and other relatives can create conflicts or the appearance of them."}}
==Applicability of the policy==
BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, categories, lists, article titles and [[Wikipedia:Drafts|drafts]].
===Non-article space===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPTALK}}
Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced and not related to making content choices should be removed, deleted, or [[WP:Oversight|oversighted]], as appropriate. When seeking advice about whether to publish something about a living person, be careful not to post so much information on the talk page that the inquiry becomes moot. For example, it would be appropriate to begin a discussion by stating {{tq|[https://www.example.com This link] has serious allegations about subject; should we summarize this someplace in the article?}} The same principle applies to problematic images. Questionable claims already discussed can be removed with a reference to the previous discussion.
The BLP policy also applies to user and user talk pages. The single exception is that users may make any claim they wish about themselves in their user space, so long as they are not engaged in impersonation, and subject to [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not]], though minors are discouraged from disclosing identifying personal information on their userpages; for more information, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy|here]].{{efn|See [[Wikipedia:Credentials]] and its talk page.}} Although this policy applies to posts about Wikipedians in project space, some leeway is permitted to allow the handling of administrative issues by the community, but administrators may delete such material if it rises to the level of defamation, or if it constitutes a violation of [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]].
===<span class="anchor" id="BLPABUSE"></span> Usernames===
<!--Don't remove [[Template:Anchor|anchor template]] (or edit the name within their doubled, curly brackets).-->
{{see also|Wikipedia:Username policy#Usernames violating the BLP policy}}{{shortcut|WP:BLPNAMEABUSE}}
Disruptive and offensive usernames (for example, names containing contentious material about living persons, or that are clearly abusive towards any race, religion or social group) should be immediately blocked and [[Wikipedia:Suppression|suppressed from logs]]. Requests for removing attack usernames from logs should be [[User:Oversight|reported]] to the [[Wikipedia:Oversight|oversight]] team for evaluation.
===Images===
{{see|Wikipedia:No original research#Original images}}
{{Policy shortcut|WP:MUG|WP:BLPIMAGE}}
Images of living persons should not be used out of context to present a person in a false or disparaging light. This is particularly important for police booking photographs (mugshots), or situations where the subject did not expect to be photographed. Any police photograph used to imply that the person depicted was charged with or convicted of a specific crime must be sourced to a top-quality [[WP:RS|reliable source]] with a widely acknowledged reputation for fact-checking and accuracy that links the relevant image to the specific incident or crime in question.
Images of living persons that have been created by Wikipedians or others may be used only if they have been released under a copyright licence that is compatible with [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]].
===Categories, lists, and navigation templates===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPCAT}}
{{See also|Wikipedia:Categorization of people|Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates|Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality|Wikipedia:Eponymous overcategorization}}
[[WP:CATEGORY|Category]] names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources. Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief (or lack of such) or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or [[wikt:notability|notability]], according to reliable published sources.
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPCRIMINAL|WP:BLPRACIST}}
{{Anchor|CRIMINAL|RACIST|SEXIST|EXTREMIST}}
Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a person has a poor reputation (see [[false light]]). For example, [[:Category:Criminals]] and its subcategories should be added only for an incident that is relevant to the person's [[WP:N|notability]]; the incident was published by reliable third-party sources; the subject was convicted; and the conviction was not overturned on appeal. In particular, do not categorize biographies of living people under such contentious topics as [[:Category:Racism|racism]], [[:Category:Sexism|sexism]], [[:Category:Extremism|extremism]], and the like, since these have the effect of [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Contentious labels|labeling a person]] as a racist, sexist, or extremist. {{Crossref |(See also {{slink|Wikipedia:Overcategorization|Subjective inclusion criteria}} and {{slink|Wikipedia:Overcategorization|Opinion about a question or issue}}.)}}
These principles apply equally to {{strong|lists, navigation templates, and {{Tl|Infobox}} statements (referring to living persons within {{em|any}} Wikipedia page)}} that are based on religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation or suggest that any living person has a poor reputation. This policy does not limit the use of administrative categories for WikiProjects, article clean-up, or other normal editor activities.
===Deceased persons, corporations, or groups of persons===
====Recently dead or probably dead====
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BDP}}
Anyone born within the past 115 years (on or after {{date|}} {{LASTYEAR|115}} <small>[{{Purge|update}}]</small>) is covered by this policy unless a reliable source has confirmed their death. Generally, this policy '''''does not apply to material concerning people who are confirmed dead by reliable sources.''''' The only exception would be for people who have recently died, in which case the policy can extend based on editorial consensus for an indeterminate period beyond the date of death—six months, one year, two years at the outside. Such extensions would '''''only apply particularly to contentious or questionable material''''' about the subject that has implications for their living relatives and friends, such as in the case of a possible suicide or a particularly gruesome crime. Even absent confirmation of death, for the purposes of this policy anyone born more than 115 years ago is presumed dead {{em|unless}} reliable sources confirm the person to have been living within the past two years. If the date of birth is unknown, editors should use reasonable judgement to infer—from dates of events noted in the article—if it is plausible that the person was born within the last 115 years and is therefore covered by this policy.
====Legal persons and groups====
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPGROUP}}
This policy does not normally apply to material about corporations, companies, or other entities regarded as [[legal person]]s, though any such material must be written in accordance with other content policies. The extent to which the BLP policy applies to edits about groups is complex and must be judged on a case-by-case basis. A harmful statement about a small group or organization comes closer to being a BLP problem than a similar statement about a larger group; and when the group is very small, it may be impossible to draw a distinction between the group and the individuals that make up the group. When in doubt, make sure you are using [[WP:SOURCES|high-quality sources]].
==Maintenance of BLPs==
===Importance of maintenance===
{{dablink|Report BLP incidents at the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]].}}
Wikipedia contains [[:Category:Living people|over a million articles about living persons]]. From both a legal and ethical standpoint it is essential that a determined effort be made to eliminate defamatory and other inappropriate material from these articles, but these concerns must be balanced against other concerns, such as allowing articles to show a bias in the subject's favor by removing appropriate material simply because the subject objects to it, or allowing articles about non-[[WP:N|notable]] publicity-seekers to be retained. When in doubt about whether material in a BLP is appropriate, the article should be pared back to a policy-compliant version. Sometimes the use of administrative tools such as [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]] and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]] is necessary for the enforcement of this policy, and in extreme cases [[WP:Office actions|action]] by Wikimedia Foundation staff is required.
===<span class="anchor" id="Templates"></span> Templates===
{{tl|BLP}} alerting readers to this policy may be added to the talk pages of BLPs and other articles that focus on living persons. {{tl|Blpo}} is suitable for articles containing material on the deceased that also contains material about living persons. If a {{tl|WikiProject Biography}} template is present, you can add <code>|living=yes</code> to the template parameters. If a {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}} template is also present, add <code>|blp=yes</code> to it.
For articles, {{tl|BLP dispute}} may be used on BLPs needing attention; {{tl|BLP sources}} on BLPs needing better sourcing (an alternative is {{tl|BLP primary sources}}); and {{tl|BLP unsourced}} for those with no sources at all. {{tl|BLP noticeboard}} should be placed on the talk page of BLP articles that are being discussed on the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]].
For editors violating this policy, the following can be used to warn them on their talk pages:
* {{tl|uw-biog1}}
* {{tl|uw-biog2}}
* {{tl|uw-biog3}}
* {{tl|uw-biog4}}
* {{tl|uw-biog4im}}
* {{tl|uw-bioblock}} for when a block is issued
The template {{tl|BLP removal}} can be used on the talk page of an article to explain why material has been removed under this policy, and under what conditions the material may be replaced.
==Relationship between the subject, the article, and Wikipedia==
===Dealing with edits by the subject of the article===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPEDIT|WP:BLPKIND|WP:BLPKINDNESS}}
Subjects sometimes become involved in editing material about themselves, either directly or through a representative. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has ruled in favor of showing leniency to BLP subjects who try to fix what they see as errors or unfair material. {{strong|Editors should make every effort to act with kindness toward the subjects of biographical material when the subjects arrive to express concern.}}
Although Wikipedia discourages people from [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|writing about themselves]], removal of unsourced or poorly sourced material is acceptable. When an anonymous editor blanks all or part of a BLP, this might be the subject attempting to remove problematic material. Edits like these by subjects should not be treated as vandalism; instead, the subject should be invited to explain their concerns. The Arbitration Committee established the following principle in December 2005:
{{Quote box
|bgcolor=#F8F8FF
|salign=center
|width=70%
|align=center
|fontsize= 98%
| quote=[[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers]], a guideline, advises Wikipedia users to consider the obvious fact that new users of Wikipedia will do things wrong from time to time. For those who either have or might have an article about themselves, there is a temptation—especially if apparently wrong or strongly negative information is included in such an article—to become involved in questions regarding their own article. This can open the door to rather immature behavior and loss of dignity for the new user. It is a violation of [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|don't bite the newbies]] to strongly criticize users who fall into this trap, rather than see this phenomenon as a new editor mistake.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rangerdude#Mercy]]. Passed 6-0-1.</ref>
}}
===Dealing with articles about yourself===
{{shortcut|WP:BIOSELF|WP:BLPSELF|WP:BLPCOMPLAIN|WP:BLPCOMPLAINT}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Autobiography#Problems in an article about you}}
Wikipedia has editorial policies that will often help to resolve your concern, as well as many users willing to help and a wide range of escalation processes. Very obvious errors can be fixed quickly, including by yourself. But beyond that, post suggestions on the article talk page (''see [[Help:Talk pages]]''), or place {{tl|help me}} on your [[Special:MyTalk|user talk page]]. You may also post an explanation of your concern on the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]] and ask that uninvolved editors evaluate the article to make sure it is fairly written and properly sourced.
If you are an article subject and you find the article about you contains your personal information or potentially libelous statements, {{strong|[[WP:RFO|contact the oversight team]]}} so that they can evaluate the issue and possibly [[WP:REVDEL|remove it from the page history]].
Please bear in mind that Wikipedia is almost entirely operated by volunteers; impolite behavior, even if entirely understandable, will often be less effective.
===Legal issues===
Subjects who have legal or other serious concerns about material they find about themselves on a Wikipedia page, whether in a BLP or elsewhere, may contact the Wikimedia Foundation's [[Wikipedia:Volunteer response team|volunteer response team]] (known as OTRS). Please e-mail
{{strong|[mailto:[email protected] {{nospam|info-en-q|wikimedia.org}}]}} with a link to the article and details of the problem; for more information on how to get an error corrected, see {{strong|[[Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects|here]]}}. It is usually better to ask for help rather than trying to change the material yourself.
As noted above, individuals involved in a significant legal or other off-wiki dispute with the subject of a biographical article are strongly discouraged from editing that article.
===How to contact the Wikimedia Foundation===
[[File:Contactus-wmcolors.svg|thumb|150px|{{strong|[https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/contact/ Contact us]}}]]
{{seealso|Wikimedia Foundation}}
If you are not satisfied with the response of editors and admins to a concern about biographical material about living persons, you can contact the Wikimedia Foundation directly. See {{strong|[[foundationsite:about/contact|Contact us]]}} for details.
===Wikimedia Foundation resolution===
{{see|Foundation:Resolution:Biographies of living people}}
On April 9, 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees passed a resolution regarding Wikimedia's handling of material about living persons. It noted that there are problems with some BLPs being overly promotional in tone, being vandalized, and containing errors and smears. The Foundation urges that special attention be paid to neutrality and verifiability regarding living persons; that human dignity and personal privacy be taken into account, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest; and that anyone who has a complaint about how they are described on the project's websites be treated with patience, kindness, and respect.
==Role of administrators==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPADMINS}}
===Page protection, blocks===
Administrators who suspect malicious or biased editing, or believe that inappropriate material may be added or restored, may protect or semi-protect pages. Administrators may enforce the removal of clear BLP violations with page protection or by blocking the violator(s), even if they have been editing the article themselves or are in some other way involved. In less clear cases, they should request the attention of an uninvolved administrator at [[Wikipedia:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents]].
See {{section link||Templates}} for appropriate templates to use when warning or blocking for BLP violations.
===Discretionary sanctions===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPDS}}
Editors are also subject to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]] pursuant to [[WP:NEWBLPBAN]], which in May 2014 authorized the application of discretionary sanctions to "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles on any page in any namespace." The discretionary sanctions allow administrators to apply topic bans and other measures that may not be reverted without community consensus or the agreement of the enforcing administrator.
===Deletion of BLPs===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPDEL|WP:BLPDELETE}}
====Summary deletion, creation prevention, and courtesy blanking====
{{see|Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion of biographies and BLPs}}
Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed. If the entire page is substantially of poor quality, primarily containing contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced, then it may be necessary to delete the entire page as an initial step, followed by discussion.
Page deletion is normally a last resort. If a dispute centers around a page's inclusion (e.g., because of questionable [[WP:N|notability]] or where the subject has requested deletion), this is addressed via [[WP:Deletion discussions|deletion discussions]] rather than by summary deletion. Summary deletion is appropriate when the page contains unsourced negative material or is written non-neutrally, and when this cannot readily be rewritten or restored to an earlier version of an acceptable standard. The deleting administrator should be prepared to explain the action to others, by e-mail if the material is sensitive. Those who object to the deletion should bear in mind that the deleting admin may be aware of issues that others are not. Disputes may be taken to [[WP:Deletion review|deletion review]], but protracted public discussion should be avoided for deletions involving sensitive personal material about living persons, particularly if it is negative. Such debates may be courtesy blanked upon conclusion. After the deletion, any administrator may choose to [[WP:Salting|protect it against re-creation]]. Even if the page is not protected against re-creation, it should not be re-created unless a consensus is demonstrated in support of re-creation.
====Deletion of BLPs of relatively unknown subjects====
{{see|Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion of biographies and BLPs}}
{{shortcut|WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE}}
Where the living subject of a biographical article has requested deletion, the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] says: "Discussions concerning [[WP:BLP|biographical articles]] of relatively unknown, [[WP:NPF|non-public figures]], where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, {{em|may}} be closed as delete." In addition, it says: "Poorly sourced [[WP:BIO|biographical articles]] of unknown, non-public figures, where the discussions have no editor opposing the deletion, {{em|may}} be deleted after discussions have been completed."
====Restoring deleted content====
{{shortcut|WP:BLPUNDEL|WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE}}
To ensure that material about living people is written neutrally to a high standard, and based on high-quality reliable sources, the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden of evidence|burden of proof]] is on those who wish to retain, restore, or undelete the disputed material.
When material about living persons has been deleted on good-faith BLP objections, any editor wishing to add, restore, or undelete it must ensure it complies with Wikipedia's content policies. If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first. Material that has been repaired to address concerns should be judged on a case-by-case basis.
In the case of an administrator deleting a complete article, wherever possible such disputed deletions should be discussed first with the administrator who deleted the article.
====Proposed deletion of biographies of living people====
{{see|Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people}}
All BLPs must have at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article, or it may be proposed for deletion. [[Template:Prod blp|The tag]] may not be removed until a reliable source is provided, and if none is forthcoming, the article may be deleted after seven days. This does not affect other deletion processes mentioned in BLP policy and elsewhere.
==See also==
{{Commons|Template:Personality rights}}
{{Wikipedia glossary}}
{{Div col}}
===Foundation policies and resolutions===
* [[wmf:Privacy policy|Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy]]
* [[wmf:Resolution:Biographies of living people|Wikimedia Foundation resolution on biographies of living persons]], amended November 2013.
===Arbitration cases===
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff]], July 2007.
* [[WP:ARBBLP#Biographies of living persons|Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of BLP § Biographies of living persons]], June 2008.
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 6#Motion regarding BLP deletions|Arbitration Committee/Motion regarding BLP deletions]], January 2010.
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs]], September 2011.
===Policies===
* [[Wikipedia:Attack page|Attack page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]]
* [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]]
* [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]
===Guidelines===
* [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|Autobiography]]
* [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|Conflict of interest]]
* [[Wikipedia:Fringe theories#Treatment of living persons|Fringe theories § Treatment of living persons]]
* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography|Manual of Style/Biography]]
* [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|Notability (people)]]
===Requests for comment===
* Requests for comment/Biographies of living people—[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people/Phase I|Phase I]]; [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people|Phase II]]
===FAQs===
* [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects|FAQ/Article subjects]]
* [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|FAQ/Organizations]]
===Essays===
{{category see also|User essays on BLP}}
* [[Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing|An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing]]
* [[Wikipedia:Avoiding harm|Avoiding harm]]
* [[Wikipedia:Coatrack articles|Coatrack articles]]
* [[Wikipedia:Criticism|Criticism]]
* [[Wikipedia:Minors and persons judged incompetent|Minors and persons judged incompetent]]
* [[Wikipedia:Signatures of living persons|Signatures of living persons]]
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiable but not false|Verifiable but not false]]
===Discussion forums===
* [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people|WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people]]
===Related pages===
* [[Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography]]
* [[Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue]]
{{Div col end}}
==Notes==
{{notelist|30em}}
==References==
{{reflist}}
==Further reading==
* [[:wmf:Resolution:Media about living people|Wikimedia Foundation Resolution: Biographies of living people (2009), Media about living people (2013)]]
{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}
[[Category:WikiProject Biography work groups and child projects|Living persons]]
[[Category:Wikipedia BLP policy]]
[[Category:Wikipedia content policies]]
{{For|policy on whether an individual is sufficiently noteworthy to have an article|Wikipedia:Notability (people)}}
{{notice|{{strong|Report problems about particular biographical material on Wikipedia}} to the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]]. {{xref|See also {{section link ||Dealing with articles about yourself}}, below.}}}}
{{policy|WP:BLP|WP:LIVE}}
{{nutshell|Material about living persons added to {{em|any}} Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]], [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality]], and [[Wikipedia:No original research|avoidance of original research]].}}
{{User:Oshwah/Templates/OfferHelp}}
[[File:Contactus-wmcolors.svg|thumb|If you have a complaint about a biography of a living person, and you wish to contact the [[Wikimedia Foundation]], see {{strong|[[foundationsite:about/contact|Contact us]]}}.]]
Editors must take particular care when adding '''information about living persons''' to {{em|any}} [[Wikipedia]] page.{{efn|People are presumed to be living unless there is reason to believe otherwise. This policy does not apply to people [[declared death in absentia|declared dead {{lang|la|in absentia}}]].}} Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere {{em|strictly}} to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies:
* [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]] (NPOV)
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]] (V)
* [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]] (NOR)
We must get the article {{em|right}}. Be very firm about the use of high-quality [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources|sources]]. All quotations and any material {{strong|challenged or likely to be challenged}} must be supported by an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations|inline citation]] to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be {{strong|removed immediately and without waiting for discussion}}.<ref name="ZeroInformation">{{Cite mailing list|url=https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html|title=Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information|date=16 May 2006|access-date=22 June 2018|mailing-list=[[WP:WikiEN-l|WikiEN-l]]|publisher=[[Wikimedia Foundation]]|last=Wales|first=Jimmy|author-link=Jimmy Wales|quote=It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.|archive-url=https://archive.is/20180622205129/https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html|archive-date=22 June 2018}}{{pb}}{{Cite mailing list|url=https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html|title=Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information|date=19 May 2006|access-date=22 June 2018|mailing-list=WikiEN-l|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|last=Wales|first=Jimmy|quote=If you see an unsourced statement that would be libel if false, and it makes you feel suspicious enough to want to tag it as {{tlf|citation needed}}, please do not do that! Please just remove the statement and ask a question on the talk page.|archive-url=https://archive.is/20180622205914/https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html|archive-date=22 June 2018}}{{pb}}{{Cite web|url=https://wikimania2006.wikimedia.org/wiki/Archives/Jimbo_Keynote|title=Archives/Jimbo Keynote|last=Wales|first=Jimmy|date=4 August 2006|department=[[Wikimania 2006]]|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|archive-url=https://wikimania2006.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archives/Jimbo_Keynote&oldid=9800|archive-date=8 August 2006|url-status=live|access-date=22 June 2018|quote=One of the social things that I think we can do is [[WP:BIO]] [...] I think social policies have evolved in recent years, I mean the recent months, to actually handle this problem a lot better. A lot of the admins and experienced editors are taking a really strong stand against unsourced claims, which is always a typical example of the problem. [...] And the few people who are still sort of in the old days, saying, 'Well, you know, it's a wiki, why don't we just... ', yeah, they're sort of falling by the wayside, because lots of people are saying actually, we have a really serious responsibility to get things right.}}</ref> Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].
Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]], not a [[tabloid journalism|tabloid]]: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages, including talk pages.{{efn|For examples of arbitration cases that refer to this policy's parameters, see:{{pb}}
[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden#WP:BLP applies to all living persons mentioned in an article|Rachel Marsden case]], 28 November 2006: "Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons applies to all living persons in an entry, not merely the subject of the entry."{{pb}}
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute#The BLP policy and article titles|Manning naming dispute]], 16 October 2013: "The [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy applies to all references to living persons throughout Wikipedia, including the titles of articles and pages and all other portions of any page."}} The [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility for providing citations|burden of evidence]] rests with the editor who adds or restores the material.
{{Content policy list}}
==Writing style==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPSTYLE}}
===Tone===
BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]] have published about the subjects, and [[#Using the subject as a self-published source|in some circumstances]] what the subjects have published about themselves. Summarize how actions and achievements are characterized by reliable sources without giving undue weight to [[WP:RECENTISM|recent events]]. Do not label people with [[WP:LABEL|contentious labels]], [[WP:PEACOCK|loaded language]], or terms that lack precision, unless a person is commonly described that way in reliable sources. Instead use clear, direct language and let facts alone do the talking.
===Balance===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPBALANCE}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Coatrack articles}}
Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Undue weight|disproportionate space]] to particular viewpoints; the views of small minorities should not be included at all. Care must be taken with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Article structure|article structure]] to ensure the overall presentation and section headings are broadly neutral. Beware of [[Association fallacy|claims that rely on guilt by association]], and biased, malicious or overly promotional content.
The idea expressed in [[meta:Eventualism|Eventualism]]—that every Wikipedia article is a work in progress, and that it is therefore okay for an article to be temporarily unbalanced because it will eventually be brought into shape—does {{em|not}} apply to biographies. Given their potential impact on biography subjects' lives, biographies must be fair to their subjects at all times.
===Attack pages===
{{see|Wikipedia:Attack pages|Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G10}}
Pages that are unsourced and negative in tone, especially when they appear to have been created primarily to disparage the subject, should be deleted at once if there is no policy-compliant version to revert to; {{xref|see {{section link ||Summary deletion, creation prevention, and courtesy blanking}}, below}}. Non-administrators should tag them with {{tl|db-attack}} or {{tl|db-negublp}}. Creation of such pages, especially when repeated or in bad faith, is grounds for immediate blocking.
==Reliable sources==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPRS|WP:BLPSOURCES|WP:BLPSOURCE}}
===<span class="anchor" id="CHALLENGE"></span> Challenged or likely to be challenged===
{{main|Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources}}
Wikipedia's sourcing policy, [[WP:V|Verifiability]], says that all quotations and any material {{strong|challenged or likely to be challenged}} must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations|inline citation]]; material not meeting this standard may be removed. This policy extends that principle, adding that {{strong|contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion}}. This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable and whether it is in a biography or in some other article. The material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is [[tabloid journalism]]. When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared in more reliable sources.
===<span class="anchor" id="Misuse of primary sources"></span> Avoid misuse of primary sources===
<!-- This Anchor tag serves to provide a permanent target for incoming section links. Please do not move it out of the section heading, even though it disrupts edit summary generation (you can manually fix the edit summary before saving your changes). Please do not modify it, even if you modify the section title. It is always best to anchor an old section header that has been changed so that links to it won't be broken. See [[Template:Anchor]] for details. (This text: [[Template:Anchor comment]]) -->
{{see|Wikipedia:No original research#Primary}}
{{shortcut|WP:BLPPRIMARY}}
Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do {{strong|{{em|not}}}} use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do {{strong|{{em|not}}}} use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it {{em|may}} be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, [[WP:NOR|no original research]], and the other sourcing policies.{{efn|Please note that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Exceptional claims require exceptional sources|exceptional claims]] require exceptional sources.}}
===Self-published sources===
====Avoid self-published sources====
{{anchor|Avoid self-published sources}}
{{shortcut|WP:BLPSPS}}
Never use [[Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published works|self-published sources]]—including but not limited to books, [[zine]]s, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published {{strong|by the subject of the article}}. "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some news organizations host online columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control. Posts left by readers are never acceptable as sources. See {{section link||Images}} below for our policy on self-published images.
====Using the subject as a self-published source====
{{shortcut|WP:BLPSELFPUB}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources}}
There are living persons who publish material {{strong|about themselves}}, such as through press releases or personal websites. Such material may be used as a source only if:
# it is not unduly self-serving;
# it does not involve claims about third parties;
# it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject;
# there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and
# the article is not based primarily on such sources.
===Avoid gossip and feedback loops===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPGOSSIP}}
{{See also|WP:NOTNEWS{{!}}Wikipedia is not a newspaper|Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources#Breaking news}}
Avoid repeating [[gossip]]. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether the material is being presented as true; and whether, even if true, it is relevant to a disinterested article about the subject. Be wary of relying on sources that use [[weasel word]]s and that attribute material to anonymous sources. Also beware of [[circular reporting]], in which material in a Wikipedia article gets picked up by a source, which is later cited in the Wikipedia article to support the original edit.
===Remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced<span class="anchor" id="Rm1"></span><span class="anchor" id="Remove contentious material"></span><span class="anchor" id="Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material"></span>===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:GRAPEVINE|WP:BLPREMOVE}}
{{see also|Wikipedia:Libel}}
Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that:
# is unsourced or poorly sourced;
# is an original interpretation or analysis of a source, or a synthesis of sources {{xref|(see also [[Wikipedia:No original research]])}};
# relies on self-published sources, unless written by the subject of the BLP {{xref|(see {{section link ||Using the subject as a self-published source}}, above)}}; or
# relies on sources that fail in some other way to meet [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] standards.
Note that, although the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#3RR exemptions|three-revert rule does not apply to such removals]], what counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Editors who find themselves in edit wars over potentially defamatory material about living persons should consider raising the matter at the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]] instead of relying on the exemption.
Administrators may enforce the removal of clear BLP violations with page protection or by blocking the violator(s), even if they have been editing the article themselves or are in some other way involved. In less clear cases they should request the attention of an [[WP:UNINVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrator at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents |administrators' noticeboard/Incidents page]]. {{xref|See {{section link ||Role of administrators}}, below}}.
===<span class="anchor" id="Further reading and external links"></span> Further reading, External links, and See also===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPEL|WP:BLPFR|WP:BLPSEEALSO}}
External links about living persons, whether in BLPs or elsewhere, are held to a higher standard than for other topics. [[WP:Verifiability#Questionable sources|Questionable]] or [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]] should not be included in the "Further reading" or "External links" sections of BLPs, and, when including such links in other articles, make sure the material linked to does not violate this policy. Self-published sources written or published by the subject of a BLP may be included in the "Further reading" or "External links" sections of that BLP with caution {{xref|(see {{section link||Using the subject as a self-published source}}, above)}}. In general, do not link to websites that contradict the spirit of this policy or violate the [[Wikipedia:External links|external links guideline]]. Where that guideline is inconsistent with this or any other policy, the policies prevail.
"See also" links, whether placed in [[MOS:SEEALSO|their own section]] or in a note within the text, should not be used to imply any contentious labeling, association, or claim regarding a living person, and must adhere to Wikipedia's policy of [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]].
==Presumption in favor of privacy==
===Avoid victimization===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:AVOIDVICTIM}}
When writing about a person noteworthy only for one or two events, including every detail can lead to problems—even when the material is well sourced. When in doubt, biographies should be pared back to a version that is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic. This is of particular importance when dealing with living individuals whose notability stems largely or entirely from being victims of another's actions. Wikipedia editors must not act, intentionally or otherwise, in a way that amounts to participating in or prolonging the victimization.
===Public figures===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PUBLICFIGURE|WP:WELLKNOWN|WP:BLPPUBLIC}}
{{see also|Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual}}
In the case of [[public figure]]s, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If you cannot find {{em|multiple}} reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out.
* '''Example:''' "John Doe had a messy divorce from Jane Doe." Is the divorce important to the article, and was it published by third-party reliable sources? If not, leave it out. If so, [[WP:LABEL|avoid use of "messy"]] and stick to the facts: "John Doe and Jane Doe divorced."
* '''Example:''' A politician is alleged to have had an affair. It is denied, but multiple major newspapers publish the allegations, and there is a public scandal. The allegation belongs in the biography, citing those sources. However, it should state only that the politician was {{em|alleged}} to have had the affair, not that the affair actually {{em|occurred}}.
{{anchor|Denial}}If the subject has denied such allegations, their denial(s) should also be reported, while adhering to appropriate [[WP:DUE|due weight]] of all sources covering the subject and avoiding [[WP:FALSEBALANCE|false balance]].
===<span class="anchor" id="Relatively unknown"></span> People who are relatively unknown===
{{Redirect|WP:NPF|information regarding newly created pages on Wikipedia ("New Pages Feed")|Wikipedia:Page Curation}}
{{see also|Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual}}
{{Policy shortcut|WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE|WP:NPF}}
Many Wikipedia articles contain material on people who are not well known, even if they are [[WP:N|notable]] enough for their own article. In such cases, exercise restraint and include {{em|only}} material relevant to the person's notability, focusing on high-quality [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]]. Material published by the subject may be used, but with caution {{xref|(see {{slink||Using the subject as a self-published source}}, above)}}. Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there are additional protections for subjects who are not public figures.
===Privacy of personal information and using primary sources===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPPRIVACY|WP:DOB}}
{{see also|#Privacy of names}}
With [[identity theft]] a serious ongoing concern, many people regard their full names and dates of birth as private. Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public. If a subject complains about our inclusion of their date of birth, or the person is borderline [[WP:N|notable]], err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it. In a similar vein, articles should not include postal addresses, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, or other contact information for living persons, although links to [[WP:ELOFFICIAL|websites maintained by the subject]] are generally permitted. See {{slink||Avoid misuse of primary sources}} regarding the misuse of primary sources to obtain personal information about subjects.
Consensus has indicated that the standard for inclusion of personal information of living persons is higher than mere existence of a reliable source that could be verified.<ref>[[Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons/Archive_45#Removal of WP:DOB]]</ref>
If there is a situation in which multiple different independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] state differing years or dates of birth in conflict, consensus has been found to include all birth dates/years for which a reliable source exists, clearly noting discrepancies. In this situation, editors may not include only one date/year for which they consider "most likely". In this situation, editors may not include merely a single date from one of two or more reliable sources. Original research cannot be used to extrapolate the date of birth.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive_165#People's birthdate, conflicting (reliable) sources, and WP:SYNTHESIS]]</ref>
If you see personal information such as phone numbers, addresses, account numbers, etc. in a BLP or anywhere on Wikipedia, edit the page to remove it and {{strong|[[WP:RFO|contact the oversight team]]}} so that they can evaluate it and possibly remove it from the page history. To reduce the chances of triggering the [[Streisand effect]], use a bland/generic edit summary and {{em|do not}} mention that you will be requesting Oversight.
A verified social media account of an adult article subject saying about themselves something along the lines of "today is my 50th birthday" falls under [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves|self-published sources]] for purposes of reporting a full date of birth. It is usable if there is no reason to doubt it.<ref>[[Special:Permalink/1030363909#Tweets announcing "Happy birthday to me! I'm 21 today!"|June 2021, talk page discussion]]</ref>
===Subjects notable only for one event===
<!-- "Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event" links here -->
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLP1E}}
{{See|Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event|Wikipedia:What BLP1E is not}}
[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS|Wikipedia is not news, or an indiscriminate collection of information]]. Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article. We generally should avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met:
# If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.
# If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a [[Wikipedia:Who is a low profile individual|low-profile individual]]. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. In such cases, it is usually better to [[Wikipedia:Merging|merge]] the information and [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] the person's name to the event article.
# If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. [[John Hinckley Jr.]], for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the [[Reagan assassination attempt]], was significant and his role was both substantial and well documented.
The significance of an event or the individual's role is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources. It is important for editors to understand two clear differentiations of the ''[[Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event|people notable for only one event]]'' guideline (''[[WP:BIO1E]]'') when compared with this policy (''WP:BLP1E''): ''WP:BLP1E'' should be applied only to biographies of {{em|living}} people, or those who have recently died, and to biographies of [[Wikipedia:Who is a low profile individual|low-profile individuals]].
In addition, some subject-specific notability guidelines, such as [[Wikipedia:Notability (sports)]], provide criteria that may support the notability of certain individuals who are known chiefly for one event.
===<span class="anchor" id="BLPCRIME"></span><span class="anchor" id="BLPCRIM"></span><span class="anchor" id="CRIME"></span> People accused of crime===
<!--Don't remove [[Template:Anchor|anchor template]] (or edit the name within their doubled, curly brackets).-->{{see also|Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Criminal acts|Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Crime victims and perpetrators}}{{shortcut|WP:BLPCRIME|WP:SUSPECT}}
A living person accused of a crime is [[presumption of innocence|presumed innocent]] until convicted by a court of law. Accusations, investigations and arrests do not amount to a conviction. For individuals who are [[WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE|not public figures]]; that is, individuals not covered by {{section link||Public figures}}, editors must seriously consider {{strong|not}} including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured.
If different judicial proceedings result in seemingly contradictory outcomes that do not overrule each other,{{efn|For example, [[O. J. Simpson]] was [[O. J. Simpson murder case|acquitted]] in 1995 of the murder of [[Nicole Brown Simpson]] and [[Ronald Goldman]], but was found liable for their [[wrongful death]]s in a civil trial two years later.}} include sufficient explanatory information.
===Privacy of names===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPNAME|WP:LPNAME}}
Caution should be applied when identifying individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event. When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context. When deciding whether to include a name, its publication in secondary sources other than news media, such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories. Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value.
The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject. However, names of family members who are not also notable public figures {{em|must}} be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced.
==<span class="anchor" id="Importation of off-wiki disputes into Wikipedia"></span> Using BLPs to continue disputes==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPCOI}}
Wikipedia articles concerning living persons may include material—where relevant, properly weighted, and reliably sourced—about controversies or disputes in which the article subject has been involved. Wikipedia is not a forum provided for parties to off-wiki disputes to continue their hostilities. Experience has shown that misusing Wikipedia to perpetuate legal, political, social, literary, scholarly, or other disputes is harmful to the subjects of biographical articles, to other parties in the dispute, and to Wikipedia itself.
Therefore, an editor who is involved in a significant controversy or dispute with another individual—whether on- or off-wiki—or who is an avowed rival of that individual, should not edit that person's biography or other material about that person, given the [[WP:POTENTIALCOI|potential conflict of interest]]. More generally, editors who have a strongly negative or positive view of the subject of a biographical article should be especially careful to edit that article [[WP:NPOV|neutrally]], if they choose to edit it at all.{{efn|The [https://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_conflicts/foundation/index.html Columbia Center for New Media Teaching and Learning], Columbia University: "A conflict of interest involves the abuse – actual, apparent, or potential – of the trust that people have in professionals. The simplest working definition states: A conflict of interest is a situation in which financial or other personal considerations have the potential to compromise or bias professional judgment and objectivity. An apparent conflict of interest is one in which a reasonable person would think that the professional's judgment is likely to be compromised. A potential conflict of interest involves a situation that may develop into an actual conflict of interest. It is important to note that a conflict of interest exists whether or not decisions are affected by a personal interest; a conflict of interest implies only the potential for bias, not a likelihood. It is also important to note that a conflict of interest is not considered misconduct in research, since the definition for misconduct is currently limited to fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism."{{pb}}
[https://web.archive.org/web/20070630123620/http://nytco.com/press/ethics.html The New York Times Company]: "Conflicts of interest, real or apparent, may arise in many areas. They may involve tensions between journalists' professional obligations to our audience and their relationships with news sources, advocacy groups, advertisers, or competitors; with one another; or with the company or one of its units. And at a time when two-career families are the norm, the civic and professional activities of spouses, household members and other relatives can create conflicts or the appearance of them."}}
==Applicability of the policy==
BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, categories, lists, article titles and [[Wikipedia:Drafts|drafts]].
===Non-article space===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPTALK}}
Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced and not related to making content choices should be removed, deleted, or [[WP:Oversight|oversighted]], as appropriate. When seeking advice about whether to publish something about a living person, be careful not to post so much information on the talk page that the inquiry becomes moot. For example, it would be appropriate to begin a discussion by stating {{tq|[https://www.example.com This link] has serious allegations about subject; should we summarize this someplace in the article?}} The same principle applies to problematic images. Questionable claims already discussed can be removed with a reference to the previous discussion.
The BLP policy also applies to user and user talk pages. The single exception is that users may make any claim they wish about themselves in their user space, so long as they are not engaged in impersonation, and subject to [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not]], though minors are discouraged from disclosing identifying personal information on their userpages; for more information, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy|here]].{{efn|See [[Wikipedia:Credentials]] and its talk page.}} Although this policy applies to posts about Wikipedians in project space, some leeway is permitted to allow the handling of administrative issues by the community, but administrators may delete such material if it rises to the level of defamation, or if it constitutes a violation of [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]].
===<span class="anchor" id="BLPABUSE"></span> Usernames===
<!--Don't remove [[Template:Anchor|anchor template]] (or edit the name within their doubled, curly brackets).-->
{{see also|Wikipedia:Username policy#Usernames violating the BLP policy}}{{shortcut|WP:BLPNAMEABUSE}}
Disruptive and offensive usernames (for example, names containing contentious material about living persons, or that are clearly abusive towards any race, religion or social group) should be immediately blocked and [[Wikipedia:Suppression|suppressed from logs]]. Requests for removing attack usernames from logs should be [[User:Oversight|reported]] to the [[Wikipedia:Oversight|oversight]] team for evaluation.
===Images===
{{see|Wikipedia:No original research#Original images}}
{{Policy shortcut|WP:MUG|WP:BLPIMAGE}}
Images of living persons should not be used out of context to present a person in a false or disparaging light. This is particularly important for police booking photographs (mugshots), or situations where the subject did not expect to be photographed. Any police photograph used to imply that the person depicted was charged with or convicted of a specific crime must be sourced to a top-quality [[WP:RS|reliable source]] with a widely acknowledged reputation for fact-checking and accuracy that links the relevant image to the specific incident or crime in question.
Images of living persons that have been created by Wikipedians or others may be used only if they have been released under a copyright licence that is compatible with [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]].
===Categories, lists, and navigation templates===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPCAT}}
{{See also|Wikipedia:Categorization of people|Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates|Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality|Wikipedia:Eponymous overcategorization}}
[[WP:CATEGORY|Category]] names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources. Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief (or lack of such) or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or [[wikt:notability|notability]], according to reliable published sources.
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPCRIMINAL|WP:BLPRACIST}}
{{Anchor|CRIMINAL|RACIST|SEXIST|EXTREMIST}}
Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a person has a poor reputation (see [[false light]]). For example, [[:Category:Criminals]] and its subcategories should be added only for an incident that is relevant to the person's [[WP:N|notability]]; the incident was published by reliable third-party sources; the subject was convicted; and the conviction was not overturned on appeal. In particular, do not categorize biographies of living people under such contentious topics as [[:Category:Racism|racism]], [[:Category:Sexism|sexism]], [[:Category:Extremism|extremism]], and the like, since these have the effect of [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Contentious labels|labeling a person]] as a racist, sexist, or extremist. {{Crossref |(See also {{slink|Wikipedia:Overcategorization|Subjective inclusion criteria}} and {{slink|Wikipedia:Overcategorization|Opinion about a question or issue}}.)}}
These principles apply equally to {{strong|lists, navigation templates, and {{Tl|Infobox}} statements (referring to living persons within {{em|any}} Wikipedia page)}} that are based on religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation or suggest that any living person has a poor reputation. This policy does not limit the use of administrative categories for WikiProjects, article clean-up, or other normal editor activities.
===Deceased persons, corporations, or groups of persons===
====Recently dead or probably dead====
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BDP}}
Anyone born within the past 115 years (on or after {{date|}} {{LASTYEAR|115}} <small>[{{Purge|update}}]</small>) is covered by this policy unless a reliable source has confirmed their death. Generally, this policy '''''does not apply to material concerning people who are confirmed dead by reliable sources.''''' The only exception would be for people who have recently died, in which case the policy can extend based on editorial consensus for an indeterminate period beyond the date of death—six months, one year, two years at the outside. Such extensions would '''''only apply particularly to contentious or questionable material''''' about the subject that has implications for their living relatives and friends, such as in the case of a possible suicide or a particularly gruesome crime. Even absent confirmation of death, for the purposes of this policy anyone born more than 115 years ago is presumed dead {{em|unless}} reliable sources confirm the person to have been living within the past two years. If the date of birth is unknown, editors should use reasonable judgement to infer—from dates of events noted in the article—if it is plausible that the person was born within the last 115 years and is therefore covered by this policy.
====Legal persons and groups====
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPGROUP}}
This policy does not normally apply to material about corporations, companies, or other entities regarded as [[legal person]]s, though any such material must be written in accordance with other content policies. The extent to which the BLP policy applies to edits about groups is complex and must be judged on a case-by-case basis. A harmful statement about a small group or organization comes closer to being a BLP problem than a similar statement about a larger group; and when the group is very small, it may be impossible to draw a distinction between the group and the individuals that make up the group. When in doubt, make sure you are using [[WP:SOURCES|high-quality sources]].
==Maintenance of BLPs==
===Importance of maintenance===
{{dablink|Report BLP incidents at the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]].}}
Wikipedia contains [[:Category:Living people|over a million articles about living persons]]. From both a legal and ethical standpoint it is essential that a determined effort be made to eliminate defamatory and other inappropriate material from these articles, but these concerns must be balanced against other concerns, such as allowing articles to show a bias in the subject's favor by removing appropriate material simply because the subject objects to it, or allowing articles about non-[[WP:N|notable]] publicity-seekers to be retained. When in doubt about whether material in a BLP is appropriate, the article should be pared back to a policy-compliant version. Sometimes the use of administrative tools such as [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]] and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]] is necessary for the enforcement of this policy, and in extreme cases [[WP:Office actions|action]] by Wikimedia Foundation staff is required.
===<span class="anchor" id="Templates"></span> Templates===
{{tl|BLP}} alerting readers to this policy may be added to the talk pages of BLPs and other articles that focus on living persons. {{tl|Blpo}} is suitable for articles containing material on the deceased that also contains material about living persons. If a {{tl|WikiProject Biography}} template is present, you can add <code>|living=yes</code> to the template parameters. If a {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}} template is also present, add <code>|blp=yes</code> to it.
For articles, {{tl|BLP dispute}} may be used on BLPs needing attention; {{tl|BLP sources}} on BLPs needing better sourcing (an alternative is {{tl|BLP primary sources}}); and {{tl|BLP unsourced}} for those with no sources at all. {{tl|BLP noticeboard}} should be placed on the talk page of BLP articles that are being discussed on the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]].
For editors violating this policy, the following can be used to warn them on their talk pages:
* {{tl|uw-biog1}}
* {{tl|uw-biog2}}
* {{tl|uw-biog3}}
* {{tl|uw-biog4}}
* {{tl|uw-biog4im}}
* {{tl|uw-bioblock}} for when a block is issued
The template {{tl|BLP removal}} can be used on the talk page of an article to explain why material has been removed under this policy, and under what conditions the material may be replaced.
==Relationship between the subject, the article, and Wikipedia==
===Dealing with edits by the subject of the article===
{{shortcut|WP:BLPEDIT|WP:BLPKIND|WP:BLPKINDNESS}}
Subjects sometimes become involved in editing material about themselves, either directly or through a representative. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has ruled in favor of showing leniency to BLP subjects who try to fix what they see as errors or unfair material. {{strong|Editors should make every effort to act with kindness toward the subjects of biographical material when the subjects arrive to express concern.}}
Although Wikipedia discourages people from [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|writing about themselves]], removal of unsourced or poorly sourced material is acceptable. When an anonymous editor blanks all or part of a BLP, this might be the subject attempting to remove problematic material. Edits like these by subjects should not be treated as vandalism; instead, the subject should be invited to explain their concerns. The Arbitration Committee established the following principle in December 2005:
{{Quote box
|bgcolor=#F8F8FF
|salign=center
|width=70%
|align=center
|fontsize= 98%
| quote=[[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers]], a guideline, advises Wikipedia users to consider the obvious fact that new users of Wikipedia will do things wrong from time to time. For those who either have or might have an article about themselves, there is a temptation—especially if apparently wrong or strongly negative information is included in such an article—to become involved in questions regarding their own article. This can open the door to rather immature behavior and loss of dignity for the new user. It is a violation of [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|don't bite the newbies]] to strongly criticize users who fall into this trap, rather than see this phenomenon as a new editor mistake.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rangerdude#Mercy]]. Passed 6-0-1.</ref>
}}
===Dealing with articles about yourself===
{{shortcut|WP:BIOSELF|WP:BLPSELF|WP:BLPCOMPLAIN|WP:BLPCOMPLAINT}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Autobiography#Problems in an article about you}}
Wikipedia has editorial policies that will often help to resolve your concern, as well as many users willing to help and a wide range of escalation processes. Very obvious errors can be fixed quickly, including by yourself. But beyond that, post suggestions on the article talk page (''see [[Help:Talk pages]]''), or place {{tl|help me}} on your [[Special:MyTalk|user talk page]]. You may also post an explanation of your concern on the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|biographies of living persons noticeboard]] and ask that uninvolved editors evaluate the article to make sure it is fairly written and properly sourced.
If you are an article subject and you find the article about you contains your personal information or potentially libelous statements, {{strong|[[WP:RFO|contact the oversight team]]}} so that they can evaluate the issue and possibly [[WP:REVDEL|remove it from the page history]].
Please bear in mind that Wikipedia is almost entirely operated by volunteers; impolite behavior, even if entirely understandable, will often be less effective.
===Legal issues===
Subjects who have legal or other serious concerns about material they find about themselves on a Wikipedia page, whether in a BLP or elsewhere, may contact the Wikimedia Foundation's [[Wikipedia:Volunteer response team|volunteer response team]] (known as OTRS). Please e-mail
{{strong|[mailto:[email protected] {{nospam|info-en-q|wikimedia.org}}]}} with a link to the article and details of the problem; for more information on how to get an error corrected, see {{strong|[[Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects|here]]}}. It is usually better to ask for help rather than trying to change the material yourself.
As noted above, individuals involved in a significant legal or other off-wiki dispute with the subject of a biographical article are strongly discouraged from editing that article.
===How to contact the Wikimedia Foundation===
[[File:Contactus-wmcolors.svg|thumb|150px|{{strong|[https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/contact/ Contact us]}}]]
{{seealso|Wikimedia Foundation}}
If you are not satisfied with the response of editors and admins to a concern about biographical material about living persons, you can contact the Wikimedia Foundation directly. See {{strong|[[foundationsite:about/contact|Contact us]]}} for details.
===Wikimedia Foundation resolution===
{{see|Foundation:Resolution:Biographies of living people}}
On April 9, 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees passed a resolution regarding Wikimedia's handling of material about living persons. It noted that there are problems with some BLPs being overly promotional in tone, being vandalized, and containing errors and smears. The Foundation urges that special attention be paid to neutrality and verifiability regarding living persons; that human dignity and personal privacy be taken into account, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest; and that anyone who has a complaint about how they are described on the project's websites be treated with patience, kindness, and respect.
==Role of administrators==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPADMINS}}
===Page protection, blocks===
Administrators who suspect malicious or biased editing, or believe that inappropriate material may be added or restored, may protect or semi-protect pages. Administrators may enforce the removal of clear BLP violations with page protection or by blocking the violator(s), even if they have been editing the article themselves or are in some other way involved. In less clear cases, they should request the attention of an uninvolved administrator at [[Wikipedia:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents]].
See {{section link||Templates}} for appropriate templates to use when warning or blocking for BLP violations.
===Discretionary sanctions===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPDS}}
Editors are also subject to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]] pursuant to [[WP:NEWBLPBAN]], which in May 2014 authorized the application of discretionary sanctions to "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles on any page in any namespace." The discretionary sanctions allow administrators to apply topic bans and other measures that may not be reverted without community consensus or the agreement of the enforcing administrator.
===Deletion of BLPs===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:BLPDEL|WP:BLPDELETE}}
====Summary deletion, creation prevention, and courtesy blanking====
{{see|Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion of biographies and BLPs}}
Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed. If the entire page is substantially of poor quality, primarily containing contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced, then it may be necessary to delete the entire page as an initial step, followed by discussion.
Page deletion is normally a last resort. If a dispute centers around a page's inclusion (e.g., because of questionable [[WP:N|notability]] or where the subject has requested deletion), this is addressed via [[WP:Deletion discussions|deletion discussions]] rather than by summary deletion. Summary deletion is appropriate when the page contains unsourced negative material or is written non-neutrally, and when this cannot readily be rewritten or restored to an earlier version of an acceptable standard. The deleting administrator should be prepared to explain the action to others, by e-mail if the material is sensitive. Those who object to the deletion should bear in mind that the deleting admin may be aware of issues that others are not. Disputes may be taken to [[WP:Deletion review|deletion review]], but protracted public discussion should be avoided for deletions involving sensitive personal material about living persons, particularly if it is negative. Such debates may be courtesy blanked upon conclusion. After the deletion, any administrator may choose to [[WP:Salting|protect it against re-creation]]. Even if the page is not protected against re-creation, it should not be re-created unless a consensus is demonstrated in support of re-creation.
====Deletion of BLPs of relatively unknown subjects====
{{see|Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion of biographies and BLPs}}
{{shortcut|WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE}}
Where the living subject of a biographical article has requested deletion, the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] says: "Discussions concerning [[WP:BLP|biographical articles]] of relatively unknown, [[WP:NPF|non-public figures]], where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, {{em|may}} be closed as delete." In addition, it says: "Poorly sourced [[WP:BIO|biographical articles]] of unknown, non-public figures, where the discussions have no editor opposing the deletion, {{em|may}} be deleted after discussions have been completed."
====Restoring deleted content====
{{shortcut|WP:BLPUNDEL|WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE}}
To ensure that material about living people is written neutrally to a high standard, and based on high-quality reliable sources, the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden of evidence|burden of proof]] is on those who wish to retain, restore, or undelete the disputed material.
When material about living persons has been deleted on good-faith BLP objections, any editor wishing to add, restore, or undelete it must ensure it complies with Wikipedia's content policies. If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first. Material that has been repaired to address concerns should be judged on a case-by-case basis.
In the case of an administrator deleting a complete article, wherever possible such disputed deletions should be discussed first with the administrator who deleted the article.
====Proposed deletion of biographies of living people====
{{see|Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people}}
All BLPs must have at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article, or it may be proposed for deletion. [[Template:Prod blp|The tag]] may not be removed until a reliable source is provided, and if none is forthcoming, the article may be deleted after seven days. This does not affect other deletion processes mentioned in BLP policy and elsewhere.
==See also==
{{Commons|Template:Personality rights}}
{{Wikipedia glossary}}
{{Div col}}
===Foundation policies and resolutions===
* [[wmf:Privacy policy|Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy]]
* [[wmf:Resolution:Biographies of living people|Wikimedia Foundation resolution on biographies of living persons]], amended November 2013.
===Arbitration cases===
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff]], July 2007.
* [[WP:ARBBLP#Biographies of living persons|Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of BLP § Biographies of living persons]], June 2008.
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 6#Motion regarding BLP deletions|Arbitration Committee/Motion regarding BLP deletions]], January 2010.
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs]], September 2011.
===Policies===
* [[Wikipedia:Attack page|Attack page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]]
* [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]]
* [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]
===Guidelines===
* [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|Autobiography]]
* [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|Conflict of interest]]
* [[Wikipedia:Fringe theories#Treatment of living persons|Fringe theories § Treatment of living persons]]
* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography|Manual of Style/Biography]]
* [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|Notability (people)]]
===Requests for comment===
* Requests for comment/Biographies of living people—[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people/Phase I|Phase I]]; [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people|Phase II]]
===FAQs===
* [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects|FAQ/Article subjects]]
* [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|FAQ/Organizations]]
===Essays===
{{category see also|User essays on BLP}}
* [[Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing|An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing]]
* [[Wikipedia:Avoiding harm|Avoiding harm]]
* [[Wikipedia:Coatrack articles|Coatrack articles]]
* [[Wikipedia:Criticism|Criticism]]
* [[Wikipedia:Minors and persons judged incompetent|Minors and persons judged incompetent]]
* [[Wikipedia:Signatures of living persons|Signatures of living persons]]
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiable but not false|Verifiable but not false]]
===Discussion forums===
* [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people|WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people]]
===Related pages===
* [[Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography]]
* [[Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue]]
{{Div col end}}
==Notes==
{{notelist|30em}}
==References==
{{reflist}}
==Further reading==
* [[:wmf:Resolution:Media about living people|Wikimedia Foundation Resolution: Biographies of living people (2009), Media about living people (2013)]]
{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}
[[Category:WikiProject Biography work groups and child projects|Living persons]]
[[Category:Wikipedia BLP policy]]
[[Category:Wikipedia content policies]]