Search results

...l |first=Brian |author-link=Brian Regal |year=2009 |title=Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia |url=https://archive.org/details/pseudosciencecri00rega_858 |u ...281-712-1}}</ref><ref>Hansel, C. E. M. (1980). ''ESP and Parapsychology: A Critical Re-evaluation''. Prometheus Books. pp. 86–122. {{ISBN|978-0879751203}}</r

===Lack of critical media coverage=== ...rian Regal]] includes an entry for cryptozoology in his ''Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia'' (2009). Regal says that "as an intellectual endeavor, crypto

...distance.<ref>{{cite book|title=Anomalistic psychology: a study of magical thinking|author1=Zusne, Leonard |author2=Jones, Warren |year=1989|publisher=Lawrence ...k |author-link= Ray Hyman |last= Hyman |first= Ray |date= 1985 |chapter= A Critical Historical Overview of Parapsychology |editor-link= Paul Kurtz |editor-last

...thy, and the Hopkinsville Goblins: Using Pseudoscience to Teach Scientific Thinking |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262378970 |last1=Schmaltz |fi ...|issue=5|pages=13–19}}</ref> Eventually, more mainstream scientists became critical of parapsychology as an endeavor, and statements by the National Academies

...<ref name="Gambrill2012">{{cite book|author=Eileen Gambrill|title=Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions|url= ...e|year=1988|name-list-style=vanc|title=Pseudoscience and the Paranormal: A Critical Examination of the Evidence |publisher=Prometheus Books|location=Buffalo, N

...cient evidence.<ref name=Byford>{{Cite book |title=Conspiracy theories : a critical introduction |last=Byford |first=Jovan |date=2011 |publisher=[[Palgrave Mac ...4003821-main.pdf}}</ref> and that it is correlated with lower [[analytical thinking]], low [[intelligence]], [[psychological projection]], [[paranoia]], and [[

...views: {{bulleted list |Princeton's Wordnet 2011 defines book review as "a critical review of a book (usually, [of] a recently published book)".<ref>{{cite web

...ww.wired.com/2016/05/thinking-psychic-powers-helps-us-think-science/|title=Thinking About Psychic Powers Helps Us Think About Science|magazine=[[WIRED]] |publi ...hor-link=Ray Hyman|title=Parapsychological research: A tutorial review and critical appraisal|journal= Proceedings of the IEEE|volume= 74|issue= 6|pages= 823�

...| pages=119–134 | quote=It can hardly be doubted, I think, that Dante was thinking in astrological terms when he made his prophecies. [The attached footnote c ...nalistic and critical thinker", was much more sanguine about astrology and critical of Pico's attack.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Martin |first1=Craig |title=Pietro

...dmerer]] noted in 2010: "Flexner pointed out that the scientific method of thinking applied to medical practice. By scientific method, he meant testing ideas w ...y of alternative medicine, there are several psychological issues that are critical to its growth, notably psychological effects, such as the will to believe,<

...he Washington Post (blog)}}</ref> He opposes [[Reductionism|reductionist]] thinking in science and medicine, arguing that we can trace the physical structure o ...bury Publishing|isbn=978-1-4090-2220-6}}</ref> Chopra has written that his thinking has been inspired by [[Jiddu Krishnamurti]], a 20th-century speaker and wri

...in the [[United States]], but remained more deeply established in European thinking.<ref name="Unschuld2009">{{cite book|author=Paul Ulrich Unschuld|title=What ...ast = Jonas | first = WB |author2=TJ Kaptchuk |author3=K Linde | title = A critical overview of homeopathy. | journal = Annals of Internal Medicine | year = 20