Template:Did you know nominations/Government Palace, Dili
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Government Palace, Dili
- ... that in front of the Government Palace in Dili, East Timor, is a monument (pictured) to a Portuguese Prince, Henry the Navigator? Source: "(the urban square in front of the palace is) ... complete with a statue of Infante D. Henrique in the centre ..." (hpip.org); "Out in the carpark, Henrique is commemorated more grandly. Dignatories entering the Palacio Governo through its splendid wrought iron gates, have to drive around a water feature dominated by a monument to the Infante (prince), also erected in 1960." (Walsh 2019, page 153)
- Reviewed: Dr. Rick
Created by Bahnfrend (talk). Self-nominated at 13:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:

- Neutral:

- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
QPQ: ![]()
Overall:
@Bahnfrend:, Great work on this article, well sourced, and quite a fascinating article at that. Earwig's copyvio detector says 50% copied, but that was mostly a long quote that was in quotations that was sourced. If possible, can you reword "By 2012 Gusmao had become aware of the bugging and initiated confidential proceedings in the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, seeking to have CMATS declared void because Australia had acted in bad faith by spying during the negotiations.", as this is near-identical to the source, probably unintentionally. Let me know when you finish your QPQ and changing that sentence and it should be all set. Wishing the best and you got this! Ornithoptera (talk) 01:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Ornithoptera: Thanks for your review. I have now done a QPQ. I have also modified the relevant passages. Earwig now says 47%, and that is perhaps not much of a reduction. But as you say, a relatively short passage expressly quoted from a cited source is not plagiarism or a copy vio; and in my view it is similarly not plagiarism or a copyvio to use, in an initial reference in an article, a full name and description of a place such as "Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague" or "United Nations in New York". The 47% includes both of those passages, plus some similar ones, plus the quoted, cited passage. I therefore think the article is now ok. Bahnfrend (talk) 09:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)